Open Access

CpG methylation of the FHIT, FANCF, cyclin-D2, BRCA2 and RUNX3 genes in Granulosa cell tumors (GCTs) of ovarian origin

  • Varinderpal S Dhillon1Email author,
  • Mohd Shahid2 and
  • Syed Akhtar Husain2
Molecular Cancer20043:33

DOI: 10.1186/1476-4598-3-33

Received: 30 September 2004

Accepted: 01 December 2004

Published: 01 December 2004

Abstract

Background

Granulosa cell tumors (GCTs) are relatively rare and are subtypes of the sex-cord stromal neoplasms. Methylation induced silencing in the promoters of genes such as tumor suppressor genes, DNA repair genes and pro-apoptotic genes is recognised as a critical factor in cancer development.

Methods

We examined the role of promoter hypermethylation, an epigenetic alteration that is associated with the silencing tumor suppressor genes in human cancer, by studying 5 gene promoters in 25 GCTs cases by methylation specific PCR and RT-PCR. In addition, the compatible tissues (normal tissues distant from lesion) from three non-astrocytoma patients were also included as the control.

Results

Frequencies of methylation in GCTs were 7/25 (28 % for FHIT), 6/25 (24% for FNACF), 3/25 (12% for Cyclin D2), 1/25 (4% for BRCA2) and 14/25 (56%) in RUNX3 genes. Correlation of promoter methylation with clinical characteristics and other genetic changes revealed that overall promoter methylation was higher in more advanced stage of the disease. Promoter methylation was associated with gene silencing in GCT cell lines. Treatment with methylation or histone deacetylation-inhibiting agents resulted in profound reactivation of gene expression.

Conclusions

These results may have implications in better understanding the underlying epigenetic mechanisms in GCT development, provide prognostic indicators, and identify important gene targets for treatment.

Background

Ovarian cancer is one of the most common cancers in women of all age groups. Among ovarian neoplasms, granulosa cell tumors (GCTs) are relatively rare, accounting for approximately 3% of all ovarian cancers. One common DNA modification is promoter hypermethylation associated with loss of expression of a tumor suppressor gene. During cancer development, there is a shift in methylation patterns and some promoter region CpG islands become methylated leading to silencing of the adjacent genes [1] and this process is considered to be a critical step in cancer development. The causes of methylation change in normal cells remain unknown. It has been hypothesised that fixation of methylation occurs when random seeding of methylation occurs in the promoter regions of silent genes [2]. Methylation seems to provide an ideal set of cancer specific markers for early detection of or for monitoring response to treatment. However, the use of methylation at a given site as a marker to detect low numbers of tumor cells relies on the background levels of methylation in normal tissues to be nearly zero.

The human FHIT gene is a member of the histidine triad gene family [3], the function of which remains unknown. FHIT gene has been shown to be hypermethylated in oesophageal, lung, breast, prostate, bladder, cervical, and oral cancers [49]. Recent studies indicate that FANC proteins interact with both BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes through a common pathway [10]. Methylation changes may disrupt the FANC-BRCA pathway and hence may be a marker change in the cancer development in granulosa cells of the ovary. Aberrant expression of cyclin D2 was also demonstrated in human ovarian granulosa cell tumors and testicular germ cell tumor cell lines [11]. In breast cancer, repression of expression was attributed to methylation of the cyclin D2 gene promoter region. Several studies have indicated that methylation of cyclin D2 and its mRNA and protein were absent in most breast cancer cell lines examined and in primary breast cancers although normal breast epithelial cells had abundant expression [1214]. BRCA2 may play role in regulation of the cell cycle during proliferation and differentiation. To date, only one study has shown the absence of methylation in the promoter region of BRCA2 in breast cancers cell lines and other normal human breast, bladder, colon, and liver tissues [15]. RUNX3 is one of the genes with RUNT domain, which has been identified to have a tumor suppressor role that frequently shows loss of expression due to hemizygous deletion and hypermethylation in gastric cancers [16, 17].

The role of epigenetic gene inactivation in GCTs of ovarian origin is yet not fully understood. Previously published reports on GCTs and its precursor lesions showed varying degree of promoter methylation of many tumour suppressor genes [1820]. To investigate the role of promoter methylation in detail in ovarian tumorigenesis, we further evaluated CpG methylation of 5 more tumour suppressor genes in 25 GCTs and cell lines. We found 68% of GCTs patients exhibiting promoter methylation in at least one gene. The FHIT, FANCF and RUNX3 gene promoters were frequently methylated. Methylation status was correlated with histologic characteristics. We also found evidence that promoter methylation inactivates gene expression in GCTs and exposure to methylation and/or histone deacetylase (HDAC)-inhibiting agents reactivate the gene expression.

Results

We examined the hypermethylation status of a panel of 5 normally unmethylated tumor suppressor or cancer genes: FHIT, FANCF, Cyclin-D2, BRCA2 and RUNX3 in 25 ovarian GCTs and ovarian cell line DNAs using the MSP assay (Fig. 1). The frequency of promoter hypermethylation of the tumor suppressor gene loci included in the panel was FHIT 2 8%, FANCF 24%, Cyclin-D2 12%, BRCA2 4%, and RUNX3 56% of the 25 tumours (Table 1). DNA methylation and mRNA expression results in 5 ovarian cell lines are shown in Table 2. Fig. 2a and 2b shows representative examples of MSP of each gene.
Figure 1

Methylated profile of GCTs of ovarian origin in 25 patients for FHIT, FANCF, cyclin-D2 and BRCa2 genes. Results were scored as methylated (dark boxes) or unmethylated (light grey boxes).

Table 1

DNA methylation and mRNA expression in ovarian cancer cell lines

Cell line

MSP

mRNA expression

 

FHIT

FANCF

Cyclin-D2

BRCA2

RUNX3

FHIT

FANCF

Cyclin-D2

RUNX3

TOV-21G

M

M/U

M

U

U

+

-

+

+

C13*

M/U

M

M

U

M

-

+

-

-

OAW42

U

M/U

U

U

U

+

+

+

+

OAW28

U

U

U

U

U

+

+

+

+

OV-90

M/U

U

M

U

U

+

+

-

+

KGN

M

U

U

U

M

+

+

+

-

Table 2

Association of grade classification (IA, IB and IC) and promoter methylation of different genes in granulosa cell tumours of ovarian origin

Genes

Methylation Status

Grade classification

p-value*

p-value

p-value**

p-value

p-value#

  

IA

IB

IC

     

FHIT

Methylated

3

1

3

1

0.0526

0.5856

0.2352

0.041#

 

Unmethylated

8

9

1

     

FANCF

Methylated

2

1

3

0.6609

0.0312

1

0.0769

0.041#

 

Unmethylated

9

9

1

     

Cyclin-D2

Methylated

0

0

3

0.23

0.0017

-

0.0088

0.011#

 

Unmethylated

11

10

1

     

BRCA2

Methylated

0

0

1

1

0.16

-

0.2667

0.2857

 

Unmethylated

11

10

3

     

RUNX3

Methylated

7

3

4

0.6887

0.1052

0.1984

0.5165

0.0699

 

Unmethylated

4

7

0

     

*Fisher's exact test. IA type vs. IB and IC type; †Fisher's exact test. IA and IB type vs. IC type GCTs of ovarian origin;

**Fisher's exact test. IA type vs. IB; ‡Fisher's exact test. IA type vs. IC type; #Fisher's exact test. IB type vs. IC type GCTs of ovarian origin

Figure 2

(a) Representative examples of MSP of FHIT, FANCF, Cyclin-D2 and BRCA2 genes in cell lines and tumor samples; -ve, negative control (water blank PCR mixture without template); +ve, positive control (normal lymphocyte DNA treated with Sss I methyl transferase). The unmethylated form of p16 was amplified as a control to check DNA integrity. (b) Representative examples of MSP with RUNX3 gene and its expression before and after treatment with 5'-AZA-dC in different ovarian tissue (both normal and cancerous) using RT-PCR. UT: untreated; T: treated with 5'-AZA-dC; T2–T25: tumour samples.

Hypermethylation was observed in all of the histological stages of cancer examined and in patients of all ages except BRCA2 which is seen in only one patient with stage IC. Eighteen tumors showed methylation of at least 1 gene, and 7 tumors showed no methylation of any of the 5 genes. A total of 28% of these tumors had one gene, 16% two genes, 8% three genes and 8% four genes hypermethylated (Fig 1). No methylation was observed in 15 normal ovarian tissue DNAs and 50 lymphocyte DNAs from females. Using statistical analysis, we examined methylation with regard to these cancer patient clinicopathological parameters of age and stage. None of these patients have any smoking history. FHIT methylation was only found in all three stages of the tumors but was significantly more pronounced in IC (P = 0.041 vs IB). Hypermethylation of FANCF was significantly more frequent in stage IC (P = 0.0312 when compared with IA and IB collectively; P = 0.041 vs IB). Cyclin-D2 methylation was found only in patients with IC type of cancer (P = 0.0017 vs. IA+ IB; P = 0.0088 vs. IA and P = 0.011 vs. IB; Table 1). BRCA2 methylation was found only in one patient with stage IC only cancer. RUNX3 methylation was found in all the three stages of these tumours. However, all the patients with stage IC showed methylation to associate with high stage but not at a statistically significant level. FANCF and Cyclin-D2 methylation was found to be more pronounced in older than younger patients. However, we are unable to amplify the modified DNA for either of the PCR products.

Methylation is known to inactivate the tumour suppressor genes. To test the hypothesis, we examined the expression of all these genes except BRCA2 by RT-PCR after cellular exposure to 5-Aza-2'-deoxycytidine (DAC). No FANCF mRNA in TOV-21G, Cyclin-D2 in C13* and OV-90, and RUNX3 in C13* and KGN was detected in untreated cell lines (Table 2). However, DAC treatment for 120 hours induced an increase in the detectable level of mRNA expression in these cell lines and the tumors samples that initially lacked the expression. We were unable to detect expression of RUNX3 gene in patient 11 that also shows no PCR products with either methylated or unmethylated PCR primers. Further studies involving this patient with markers specific for RUNX3 revealed the loss of heterozygosity (LOH) which may be responsible for the loss of expression (Data not given).

Discussion

Cancer cells especially of ovarian origin keep on accumulating genetic changes that allow them to evade various chemotherapeutic drugs and hence become increasingly dangerous. We try to answer some of the questions by exploring the role of methylation mediated gene silencing in five tumour suppressor gene in the present study. We asked a question whether hypermethylation of FHIT, FANCF, cyclin-D2, BRCA2 and RUNX3 resulted in the loss of gene expression. We performed reverse transcription-PCR to test the expression of all these genes on RNA extracted from tumour samples. With few exceptions, expression of mRNA correlated well with promoter hypermethylation of these genes. This could be partly due to complex process that controls gene expression in which the chromatin conformation, cofactors availability, repressor process and enhancer molecules all play a part. The present study shows that methylation is one of the important determinants, because in majority of the cases, expression of these genes in these tumours correlates with hypermethylation of the promoter sequences. We found a link between aberrant methylation of genes investigated and the clinicopathological features of stage IC, even though the sample size was small. One has to bear in mind that GCTs of ovarian origin constitute less than 5% of the total ovarian cancers. Similar reports have been reported for the FHIT methylation in highly malignant osteosarcomatous [21]. Taken together, our results demonstrate that promoter aberrant methylation of FHIT is an important mechanism for inactivation of this tumor suppressor gene in many malignancies. Cytogenetic investigation in these tumours revealed that chromosome 3 and 11 are found to carry deletions and reciprocal translocations along with the trisomy 14 and monosomy 22. It could be important because some of the tumour suppressor genes (FHIT, RASSF1A, RAR-β and FANCF) studied extensively in these tumours are in fact localised on these chromosomes.

FANC genes are essential in DNA repair pathways and recently, it has been shown that promoter hypermethylation of FANCF gene disrupts the FA-BRCA pathway, resulting in cisplastin resistance. We found FANCF promoter hypermethylation in 24% of the tumours. This is in line with the previous findings in squamous cell carcinomas of lung and oral cavity and, in cervical and ovarian cancer [2225]. To test whether other epigenetic mechanisms such as partial methylation and histone deacetylation play a role, we examined the expression of all these genes except BRCA2 after treatment with DAC. DNA hypermethylation-mediated gene silencing is closely associated with histone modifications such as methyl-H3-K9. In this regard, DNA-demethylating agents 5'-aza-2'deoxycytidine (DAC) and trichostatin (TSA) reactivates expression of epigenetically silenced genes [26]. Although DNA hypermethylation is essential to maintain repressive state of histone code, histone modifications precede DNA hypermethylation in silencing specific genes [27, 28]. In the present study, reactivation and/or increased expression of FHIT, cyclin-D2 and RUNX3 in C13*, FANCF in TOV-21G and cyclin-D2 in OV-90 cell line after exposure to DAC in the absence of promoter methylation suggests that key histone modifications, either by direct or indirect involvement of promoter methylation, also play a role in down-regulating FANCF gene expression in this cancer type. It is therefore assumed that FANCF silencing might be considered a candidate-mechanism underlying the state of genomic instability may be considered to be a rate-limiting in the origin of GCTs of ovarian origin. FANCF gene silencing has been shown to revert in vitro as a result of demethylation in some ovarian cell lines as seen in the present study also [23]. These reversible changes in the methylation status further complicate the tumour assessment that shows the contribution of FANCF methylation. The present finding along with the results from other cancer types suggests the presence of genomic instability due to the methylation mediated FANCF gene silencing. Cyclin D2 gene promoter is hypermethylated in 12% of GCTs, a number that is consistent with previous findings in other cancers [14, 29, 30]. We noted a trend that Cyclin D2 methylation is found only in IC type tumors.

The present study showed that hypermethylation of the RUNX3 gene promoter frequently occurred in ovarian GCTs. In human gastric cancers it has been shown that promoter hypermethylation and hemizygous deletion of the RUNX3 gene correlated with a significant reduction in expression, and the tumorigenicity of cell lines in nude mice was inversely related to their level of RUNX3 expression, indicating that RUNX3 is a tumor suppressor involved in the development of gastric cancers [17]. The presence of RUNX3 CpG island hypermethylation in GCTs, but not in normal ovarian tissue or peripheral blood suggests that RUNX3 hypermethylation might be associated with the genesis of this cancer type and this frequent methylation might serve as a biological marker. Loss of expression in RUNX3 gene in patient 11 which also lacks any PCR product with either of the unmethylated and methylated primers indicates that it could be due to the large deletion in the gene. However, studies involving the markers D1S234 and D1S199 showed the loss of heterozygosity which could to some extent explain the loss of expression in this patient. We could not confirm this due to the lack of further sample. However, the sample quality was good as indicated by the presence of band in GAPDH1 which was used as an internal control.

The histological examination of granulosa cells revealed that these are small, usually round to polygonal, but may be spindle-shaped with scanty amphophilic cytoplasm, containing only occasional small lipid droplets, and having indistinct cell borders. Granulosa cells regularly express inhibin and contain vimentin and smooth muscle actin intermediate filaments and, less commonly, cytokeratins. However, during their malignant transformation, theses cells exhibit one or more of so-called 'microfollicular', 'macrofollicular', 'trabecular' or 'insular' patterns. The microfollicular variant is characterized by multiple small rounded spaces formed by cystic degeneration in small aggregates of granulosa cells and often fragments of nuclear debris or pyknotic nuclei. These spaces, known as Call-Exner bodies, are found in only 30–50% of tumors. The granulosa cell nuclei are oriented somewhat radially around these structures. The nuclei are typically bland and often grooved in granulosa cell tumors and have few mitoses, but show variation in size and shape, and marked hyperchromatism.

There exist two different pathways that can contribute to the development of cancers; genome-wide hypomethylation may lead to the loss of chromosomes (as seen in these tumours) leading to chromosomal instability, whereas promoter methylation in tumour suppressor genes, which are responsible for gene silencing, can lead to the development of cancers in somatic cells. Therefore, the balance in DNA methylation is very important, and alteration in these may be protective in one pathway but deleterious in the other.

Conclusions

In view of the high mortality rates associated with ovarian cancer, a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying tumor progression in the disease could reveal novel pathways of high clinical relevance. It can therefore be concluded that promoter hypermethylation of these genes, and loss of expression in ovarian cancers (GCTs) is relatively common and this may also be useful as a tumour marker for early diagnosis and subsequent disease monitoring. Hence, these epigenetic signatures could play a decisive role in designing treatment options for this category of ovarian cancer. These results may also have implications in better understanding the underlying epigenetic mechanisms in GCT development thus can provide prognostic indicators, and identify important gene targets for treatment of this type of cancer in females.

Methods

Study Population

The subjects were 25 patients affected with GCTs of ovarian origin without a positive family history. The study was approved by the Health Research Ethics Board of the Faculty of Natural Sciences. All of them were untreated at the time of study. Fifty normal individuals ranging in age from 20–60 years were studied simultaneously under similar experimental conditions. The tumor grading is as follows: 11 FIGO stage IA, 10 FIGO stage IB and 4 FIGO stage IC. All these diagnoses were reviewed by a gynaecologic pathologist and the tumor were assessed using standard criteria. An informed consent was taken from all the subjects prior the study. Fresh cancer tissue specimens were received from all the patient and these were cultured as per standard protocol. A part of the fresh tissue was used to isolate DNA and RNA for further analysis where as the cultured cells were used for the 5'-Aza-2'-deoxycytidine experiments. Microscopically, GCTs are composed of granulosa cells, theca cells, and fibroblasts in varying amounts and combinations. The term granulosa-theca cell tumor had been applied to all tumors in which both cell types were identified, regardless of the amounts present.

Cell Lines and DNA Isolation

Five human ovarian cancer cell lines (TOV21G, C13*, OAW28, OAW42, OV90 and KGN) from the American Type Culture Collection and European Collection of Cell Culture were maintained in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Hyclone, Logan, UT) and were grown at 37°C in 5% CO2 [31]. DNA was isolated from cultured cells using QIAamp DNA Mini kit (Qiagen Inc.) and quantified. LOH studies were performed using markers D1S199 and D1S234 specific for locus 1p36.11.

Methylation Status by Methylation-Specific PCR (MS-PCR)

DNA methylation patterns in CpG islands of tumor suppressor genes FHIT, FNACF and BRCA2 were determined by chemical modification with sodium bisulphite as described previously [32]. Briefly, 1 μg DNA l was denatured by NaOH (50 μl, final concentration, 0.2 M) for 10 min at 37°C. 1 μg of salmon sperm DNA (Sigma) was added as carrier before modification. Freshly prepared 30 μl of hydroquinone (10 mM, Sigma) and 520 μl of sodium bisulfite (3 M, pH 5.0, Sigma) were mixed and samples were incubated under mineral oil at 55°C for 16 hr. The DNA samples were desalted through Wizard columns (Promega, Madison, WI), desulfonated by NaOH (final concentration, 0.3 M) for 5 min at room temperature, followed by ethanol precipitation. DNA was resuspended in water and used immediately or stored at -20°C. 50 μl of bisulphite modified DNA was used for each MSP. Following primer pairs for FHIT gene, methylated CpG site, forward 5'-ttggggcgcgggtttgggtttttacgc-3' and reverse 5'-cgtaaacgacgccgaccccacta-3', unmethylated CpG site, forward 5'-ttggggtgtgggtttgggtttttatg-3', and reverse 5'-cataaacaacaccaaccccacta-3'; 189–262 bp relative to transcription start site, FANCF gene, methylated CpG site, forward 5'-tttttgcgtttgttggagaatcgggttttc-3' and reverse 5'-atacaccgcaaaccgccgacgaacaaaacg-3', unmethylated CpG site, forward 5'-tttttgtgtttgttggagaattgggttttt-3' and reverse 5'-atacaccacaaaccaccaacaaacaaaaca-3'; the primers corresponds to the position +280 to +432, BRCA2 gene, methylated CpG site, forward 5'-gacggttgggatgtttgataagg-3' and reverse 5'-aatctatcccctcacgcttctcc-3', unmethylated CpG site, forward 5'-agggtggtttgggatttttaagg-3' and reverse 5'-tcacacttctcccaacaacaacc-3'; these primers are 135 and 211 bp upstream of transcription start site and cyclin-D2 gene, methylated, forward 5'-tacgtgttagggtcgatcg-3' (-1427 to -1409) and reverse 5'-cgaaatatctacgctaaacg-3' (-1152 to -1171) and unmethylated, forward 5'-gttatgttatgtttgttgtatg-3' (-1616 to -1594) and reverse 5'-taaaatccaccaacacaatca-3' (-1394 to -1414). Each PCR reaction generated 74 bp products both with methylated and unmethylated primers for FHIT, 153 bp for FANCF both with methylated and unmethylated primers, 337 and 250 bp product with BRCA2 primers specific for methylated and unmethylated primers and 276 and 222 bp product for cyclin-D2 primers specific for methylated and unmethylated PCR reactions respectively. For the PCR reaction of 25 μl, 50 ng sodium bisulfite treated DNA was added to reaction buffer containing 0.2 mM dNTP, 16.6 mM (NH4)2SO4, 67 mM Tris pH 8.8, 10 mM β-mercaptoethanol, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 10 pmol of forward and reverse primers specific to the methylated and methylated DNA sequences and 1.25 units of AmpliTaq Gold (PE Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The PCR reactions were cycled in a GeneAmp 9600 thermal cycler (Applied Biosystems) under the following conditions: preheat at 94°C for 3 min. followed by 40 cycles (94°C for 40 sec, 65°C for 40 sec, for FHIT, 4 cycles of 65°C and 36 cycles of 55°C for 60 seconds for FANCF and 62°C or 56°C for 40 seconds in methylated or unmethylated BRCA2 gene, 72°C for 45 sec and a final extension at 72°C for 7 min. The PCR conditions for cyclin-D2 are as follows: 1 cycle of 95°C for 5 min and 35 cycles at 95°C for 30 s, 55°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 45 s; and 1 cycle of 72°C for 5 min. In addition to these genes we also investigated the RUNX3 gene (Accession no AL023096) methylation status using the primers: forward, 5'-ataatagcggtcgttagggcgtcg-3', and reverse, 5'-gcttctactttcccgcttctcgcg-3' (64917–65031; 115 bp), for methylated DNA of RUNX3; and forward, 5'-ataatagtggttgttagggtgttg-3', and reverse, 5'-acttctactttcccacttctcaca-3' (64917–65031; 115 bp), for unmethylated DNA of RUNX3 with annealing temperature of 55°C for 20 seconds. For each PCR set, DNA isolated from normal peripheral lymphocytes of healthy individuals served as a negative methylation control. Human placental DNA was treated in vitro with SssI methyltransferase (NEB, Beverly, USA) to create completely methylated DNA at all CpG-rich regions and served as positive methylation control. Methylation-specific PCR products were analysed on 3% agarose gel electrophoresis with ethidium bromide staining. A positive control and a negative control were included in each amplification reaction.

FHIT, FANCF, Cyclin-D2 and RUNX3 Expression by RT-PCR

FHIT, FNACF and cyclin-D2 mRNA levels in cancer patients were compared to their expression in normal cells using semi-quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. In brief, cDNA was synthesized using AMV reverse transcriptase (Promega, Mannheim, Germany) and amplified in duplex reactions in a total volume of 25 μl containing 150 μM of each dNTP, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 10 pmol of each primer pair and 1.0 units of Taq polymerase. After initial denaturation at 95°C (94°C) for 5 min, 30 cycles of 30 sec (45 sec) at 95°C (94°C), 30 sec (50 sec) at 58°C (55°C) and 45 sec (50 sec) at 72°C were performed followed by a final 10 min elongation step at 72°C. The values in the brackets correspond to FANCF. The following primers were used to amplify FHIT: forward 5'-gctcttgtgaataggaaacc-3' and reverse 5'-tcactggttgaagaatacagg-3' which yields 532 bp product spanning within exon 5 to exon 10, FANCF: forward 5'-ttcggaagtctttgctgcct-3' and reverse 5'-agtaataacacacgattgcc-3' which yields 413 bp product spanning from +733 to +1144. RT-PCR was performed for Cyclin D2 using the primers 5'-catggagctgctgtgccacg-3' (forward) and 5'-ccgacctacctccagcatcc-3' (reverse) with PCR conditions being: 1 cycle of 94°C for 3 min and 35 cycles at 94°C for 20 s, 55°C for 30 s, 72°C for 45 s followed by 72°C for 5 min. RT-PCR was also carried out for RUNX3 gene using the primers: forward 5'-aggcattgcgcagctcagcggagta-3' and reverse 5'-tctgctccgtgctgccctcgcactg-3' (152 bp). GAPDH1 was used as internal control. Each reaction was performed in triplicate. PCR products were electrophoresed on 2% agarose gels and quantified using densitometer (Molecular Dynamics). Fold increases in expression in cancer cells were calculated with respect to the levels of the transcripts in normal cells.

5-Aza-2'-deoxycytidine and n-butyrate treatment

Cell lines (TOV21G, C13*, OAW28, OAW42 and OV90), normal ovarian cells and tumour cells of ovarian GCTs were treated with demethylating agent 5-Aza-2' deoxycytidine (Sigma) for five days at a concentration of 2.5 μM, HDAC-inhibiting agent trichostatin (TSA) at a final concentration of 5 μM for the last 24 hours or a combination of both. Total RNA isolated from treated, untreated cell lines and cell of the cancerous tissue was reverse transcribed using random primers and the Pro-STAR first strand RT-PCR kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). A semi-quantitative analysis of gene expression was performed in replicate experiments using 30 cycles of RT-PCR as described above.
Figure 3

(a). Expression of FHIT, FANCF and Cyclin D2 genes before and after treatment with 5'-AZA-dC in different cell lines and ovarian tissue (both normal and cancerous) using RT-PCR. NT: no treatment; T: treatment with 5'-AZA-dC; T1–T3: tumour samples; NOV: normal ovarian cells. Co-amplified product of GAPDH served as an internal control. (b) Results obtained with another cell line KGN and tumours before and after treatment with 5'-AZA-dC.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
CSIRO Health Sciences and Nutrition
(2)
Human Genetics Laboratory, Department of Biosciences, Jamia Millia Islamia

References

  1. Herman JG, Baylin SB: Gene silencing in cancer in association with promoter hypermethylation. N Engl J Med. 2003, 349: 2042-2054. 10.1056/NEJMra023075View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Clark SJ, Melki J: DNA methylation and gene silencing in cancer: which is the guilty party?. Oncogene. 2002, 21: 5380-5387. 10.1038/sj.onc.1205598View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Sozzi G, Veronese ML, Negrini M, Baffa R, Cotticelli MG, Inoue H, Tornielli S, Pilotti S, De Gregorio L, Pastorino U, Pierotti MA, Ohta M, Huebner K, Croce CM: The FHIT gene 3p14.2 is abnormal in lung cancer. Cell. 1996, 85: 17-26. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81078-8View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Tanaka H, Shimada Y, Harada H, Shinoda M, Hatooka S, Imamura M, Ishizaki K: Methylation of the 5' CpG island of the FHIT gene is closely associated with transcriptional inactivation in esophageal squamous cell carcinomas. Cancer Research. 1998, 58: 3429-3434.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Zochbauer-Muller S, Fong KM, Maitra A, Lam S, Geradts J, Ashfaq R, Virmani AK, Milchgrub S, Gazdar AF, Minna JD: 5'-CpG island methylation of the FHIT gene is correlated with loss of gene expression in lung and breast cancer. Cancer Research. 2001, 61: 3581-3585.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Maruyama R, Toyooka S, Toyooka KO, Harada K, Virmani AK, Zochbauer-Muller S, Farinas AJ, Vakar-Lopez F, Minna JD, Sagalowsky A, Czerniak B, Gazdar AF: Aberrant promoter methylation profile of bladder cancer and its relationship to clinicopathological features. Cancer Research. 2001, 61: 8659-8663.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Maruyama R, Toyooka S, Toyooka KO, Virmani AK, Zochbauer-Muller S, Farinas AJ, Minna JD, McConnell J, Frenkel EP, Gazdar AF: Aberrant promoter methylation profile of prostate cancers and its relationship to clinicopathological features. Clin Cancer Res. 2002, 8: 514-519.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Virmani AK, Muller C, Rathi A, Zoechbauer-Mueller S, Mathis M, Gazdar AF: Aberrant methylation during cervical carcinogenesis. Clin Cancer Res. 2001, 7: 584-589.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Chang KW, Kao SY, Tzeng RJ, Liu CJ, Cheng AJ, Yang SC, Wong YK, Lin SC: Multiple molecular alterations of FHIT in betel-associated oral carcinoma. J Pathol. 2002, 196: 300-306. 10.1002/path.1047View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. de Winter JP, Rooimans MA, van Der Weel L, van Berkel CG, Alon N, Bosnoyan-Collins L, de Groot J, Zhi Y, Waisfisz Q, Pronk JC, Arwert F, Mathew CG, Scheper RJ, Hoatlin ME, Buchwald M, Joenje H: The Fanconi anaemia gene FANCF encodes a novel protein with homology to ROM. Nat Gene. 2000, 24: 15-26. 10.1038/71626. 10.1038/71626View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Sicinski P, Donaher JL, Geng Y, Parker SB, Gardner H, Park MY, Robker RL, Richards JS, McGinnis LK, Biggers JD, Eppig JJ, Bronson RT, Elledge SJ, Weinberg RA: Cyclin D2 is an FSH-responsive gene involved in gonadal cell proliferation and oncogenesis. Nature. 1996, 384: 470-474. 10.1038/384470a0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Sweeney KJ, Sarcevic B, Sutherland RL, Musgrove EA: Cyclin D2 activates Cdk2 in preference to Cdk4 in human breast epithelial cells. Oncogene. 1997, 14: 1329-1340. 10.1038/sj.onc.1200951View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Nacht M, Ferguson AT, Zhang W, Petroziello JM, Cook BP, Gao YH, Maguire S, Riley D, Coppola G, Landes GM, Madden SL, Sukumar S: Combining serial analysis of gene expression and array technologies to identify genes differentially expressed in breast cancer. Cancer Research. 1999, 59: 5464-5470.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Evron E, Umbricht CB, Korz D, Raman V, Loeb DM, Niranjan B, Buluwela L, Weitzman SA, Marks J, Sukumar S: Loss of Cyclin D2 Expression in the Majority of Breast Cancers Is Associated with Promoter Hypermethylation. Cancer Research. 2001, 61: 2782-2787.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Collins N, Wooster R, Stratton MR: Absence of methylation of CpG dinucleotides within the promoter of the breast cancer susceptibility gene BRCA2 in normal tissues and in breast and ovarian cancers. Br J Cancer. 1997, 76: 1150-1156.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Cohen MM: RUNX genes, neoplasia, and cleidocranial dysplasia. Am J Med Genet. 2001, 104: 185-188.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Li QL, Ito K, Sakakura C, Fukamachi H, Inoue K, Chi XZ, Lee KY, Nomura S, Lee CW, Han SB, Kim HM, Kim WJ, Yamamoto H, Yamashita N, Yano T, Ikeda T, Itohara S, Inazawa J, Abe T, Hagiwara A, Yamagishi H, Ooe A, Kaneda A, Sugimura T, Ushijima T, Bae SC, Ito Y: Causal relationship between the loss of RUNX3 expression and gastric cancer. Cell. 2002, 109: 113-124. 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00690-6View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Arcellana-Panlilio MY, Egeler RM, Ujack E, Magliocco A, Stuart GC, Robbins SM, Coppes MJ: Evidence of a role for the INK4 family of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors in ovarian granulosa cell tumors. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2002, 35: 176-181. 10.1002/gcc.10108View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Dhillon VS, Young AR, Husain SA, Aslam M: Promoter hypermethylation of MGMT, CDH1, RAR-beta and SYK tumour suppressor genes in granulosa cell tumours (GCTs) of ovarian origin. Br J Cancer. 2004, 90: 874-881. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601567PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Dhillon VS, Aslam A, Husain SA: The contribution of genetic and epigenetic changes in granulosa cell tumors (GCTs) of ovarian origin. Clin Cancer Res. 2004, 10: 5537-5545.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Ropke M, Boltze C, Neumann HW, Roessner A, Schneider-Stock R: Genetic and epigenetic alterations in tumor progression in a dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma. Pathol Res Pract. 2003, 199: 437-444.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Hilton JL, Geisler JP, Rathe JA, Hattermann-Zogg MA, DeYoung B, Buller RE: Inactivation of BRCA1 and BRCA2 in ovarian cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002, 94: 1396-1406.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Taniguchi T, Tischkowitz M, Ameziane N, Hodgson SV, Mathew CG, Joenje H, Mok SC, D'Andrea AD: Disruption of the Fanconi-anemia-BRCA pathway in cisplastin-sensitive ovarian tumours. Nature Med. 2003, 9: 568-574. 10.1038/nm852View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Narayan G, Arias-Pulido H, Nandula SV, Basso K, Sugirtharaj DD, Vargas H, Mansukhani M, Villella J, Meyer L, Schneider A, Gissmann L, Durst M, Pothuri B, Murty VV: Promoter hypermethylation of FANCF: disruption of Fanconi Anemia-BRCA pathway in cervical cancer. Cancer Research. 2004, 64: 2994-2997.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Marsit CJ, Liu M, Nelson HH, Posner M, Suzuki M, Kelsey KT: Inactivation of the Fanconi anemia/BRCA pathway in lung and oral cancers: implications for treatment and survival. Oncogene. 2004, 23: 1000-1004. 10.1038/sj.onc.1207256View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Jones PA, Laird PW: Cancer epigenetics comes of age. Nat Genet. 1999, 21: 163-167. 10.1038/5947View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Fahrner JA, Eguchi S, Herman JG, Baylin SB: Dependence of histone modifications and gene expression on DNA hypermethylation in cancer. Cancer Research. 2002, 62: 7213-7218.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Bachman KE, Park BH, Rhee I, Rajagopalan H, Herman JG, Baylin SB, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B: Histone modifications and silencing prior to DNA methylation of a tumor suppressor gene. Cancer Cell. 2003, 3: 89-95. 10.1016/S1535-6108(02)00234-9View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Lehmann U, Celikkaya G, Hasemeier B, Langer F, Kreipe H: Promoter hypermethylation of the death-associated protein kinase gene in breast cancer is associated with the invasive lobular subtype. Cancer Res. 2002, 62: 6634-6638.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Lehmann U, Langer F, Feist H, Glockner S, Hasemeier B, Kreipe H: Quantitative assessment of promoter hypermethylation during breast cancer development. Am J Pathol. 2002, 160: 605-612.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Kruk PA, Maines-Bandiera SL, Auersperg N: A simplified method to culture human ovarian surface epithelium. Lab Invest. 1990, 63: 132-136.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Herman JG, Graff JR, Myohanen S, Nelkin BD, Baylin SB: Methylation-specific PCR: a novel PCR assay for methylation status of CpG islands. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996, 93: 9821-9826. 10.1073/pnas.93.18.9821PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Dhillon et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2004

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement