Histone deacetylase inhibitor, Trichostatin A induces ubiquitin-dependent cyclin D1 degradation in MCF-7 breast cancer cells
© Alao et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006
Received: 09 November 2005
Accepted: 20 February 2006
Published: 20 February 2006
Cyclin D1 is an important regulator of G1-S phase cell cycle transition and has been shown to be important for breast cancer development. GSK3β phosphorylates cyclin D1 on Thr-286, resulting in enhanced ubiquitylation, nuclear export and degradation of the cyclin in the cytoplasm. Recent findings suggest that the development of small-molecule cyclin D1 ablative agents is of clinical relevance. We have previously shown that the histone deacetylase inhibitor trichostatin A (TSA) induces the rapid ubiquitin-dependent degradation of cyclin D1 in MCF-7 breast cancer cells prior to repression of cyclin D1 gene (CCND1) transcription. TSA treatment also resulted in accumulation of polyubiquitylated GFP-cyclin D1 species and reduced levels of the recombinant protein within the nucleus.
Here we provide further evidence for TSA-induced ubiquitin-dependent degradation of cyclin D1 and demonstrate that GSK3β-mediated nuclear export facilitates this activity. Our observations suggest that TSA treatment results in enhanced cyclin D1 degradation via the GSK3β/CRM1-dependent nuclear export/26S proteasomal degradation pathway in MCF-7 cells.
We have demonstrated that rapid TSA-induced cyclin D1 degradation in MCF-7 cells requires GSK3β-mediated Thr-286 phosphorylation and the ubiquitin-dependent 26S proteasome pathway. Drug induced cyclin D1 repression contributes to the inhibition of breast cancer cell proliferation and can sensitize cells to CDK and Akt inhibitors. In addition, anti-cyclin D1 therapy may be highly specific for treating human breast cancer. The development of potent and effective cyclin D1 ablative agents is therefore of clinical relevance. Our findings suggest that HDAC inhibitors may have therapeutic potential as small-molecule cyclin D1 ablative agents.
Cyclin D1 is an important regulator of G1-S phase cell cycle transition. Active cyclin D1-cyclin dependent kinase 4/6 complexes phosphorylate retinoblastoma protein, resulting in release of sequestered E2F transcription factors and subsequent expression of genes required for progression into S phase . Cyclin D1 accumulation is required for progression through the G1 phase of the cell cycle. Interestingly, cyclin D1 degradation at the end of G1 phase is also necessary for progression into S phase and failure to degrade cyclin D1 results in G1 arrest . Following S phase, cyclin D1 levels again rise steadily if mitogenic stimuli remain present and elevated levels of cyclin D1 are required for continued cell cycling . Regulating the rate of ubiquitin-dependent degradation enables cells to rapidly adjust the level of cyclin D1 protein despite a constant rate of continued synthesis.
Following its discovery, cyclin D1 was localized to the nucleus and its rapid ubiquitin-dependent degradation shown to require phosphorylation at Thr286 by glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK3β) . Additional studies led to the proposal of a model in which at the end of the G1 phase, GSK3β migrates into the nucleus where it phosphorylates cyclin D1 , resulting in ubiquitylation, nuclear export and degradation of the cyclin in the cytoplasm . Cyclin D1 nuclear export is dependent on the CRM1 complex and requires prior phosphorylation of cyclin D1 by GSK3β. Inhibition of CRM1 with leptomycin B, GSK3β inhibition, or T286A mutation inhibits ubiquitin-dependent cyclin D1 degradation [4–6]. Early experiments suggested that GSK3β-dependent phosphorylation is required for cyclin D1 ubiquitylation  but cyclin D1 can also be ubiquitylated independently of GSK3β via unknown mechanisms .
Recent studies suggest that cyclin D1 regulation at the protein level may be more complex than previously thought. Firstly, a constitutively nuclear splice variant (cyclin D1b) that lacks the C-terminal domain including Thr286 was neither more stable than the wild type cyclin nor accumulated to excessive levels . These observations are surprising for the reasons stated above. Secondly, Guo et al.  demonstrated that cyclin D1 is degraded throughout the cell cycle although its destruction is enhanced during S phase. The observation that a Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP)-tagged cyclin D1 T286A mutant was more stable during S phase, linked phosphorylation at this residue to rapid protein degradation. Thr286 phosphorylation therefore enhances cyclin D1 degradation during S phase. However, GSK3β activity was unchanged throughout the cell cycle and the mutant cyclin D1 protein did not accumulate . The observed failure of cyclin D1b or Thr286 mutants to accumulate to excessive levels suggests the existence of an alternative pathway for cyclin D1 destruction that is independent of Thr286 phosphorylation and nuclear export. In addition, the rapid degradation of cyclin D1 by the 26S proteasome following DNA damage does not require either GSK3β activity or Thr286 phosphorylation . Furthermore, Thr286-independent ubiquitylation has been previously described, suggesting that rapid cyclin D1 degradation can occur by other pathways in the absence of GSK3β activity. More recently, the serine/ threonine kinase Mirk/ Dyrk1B was shown to enhance cyclin D1 degradation by phosphorylating Thr288. Mirk activity is restricted to the G0-/early G1-phase of the cell cycle and may not regulate cyclin D1 in actively cycling cells .
The Skp2 F-box protein is a specificity conferring subunit of the Skp1-Cullin-F-box (SCF) complex that has been associated with cyclin D1 ubiquitylation . Skp2 'knockdown' by siRNA abolishes degradation and results in accumulation of cyclin D1 . High levels of Skp2 can be detected at S phase, around the time that cyclin D1 phosphorylation and degradation are enhanced . Although much attention has been focused on Thr286 phosphorylation, the decline in cyclin D1 levels during S phase may also reflect increased ubiquitylation and degradation. We have previously shown that the histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor trichostatin A (TSA) induces the rapid ubiquitin-dependent degradation of cyclin D1 in MCF-7 breast cancer cells prior to repression of cyclin D1 gene (CCND1) transcription  TSA-induced cyclin D1 degradation is associated with Skp2 upregulation and Skp2 siRNA inhibits this response. In MCF-7 cells transiently expressing GFP-cyclin D1, TSA treatment resulted in accumulation of polyubiquitylated GFP-cyclin D1 species and reduced levels of the recombinant protein within the nucleus. TSA therefore induces the rapid loss of cyclin D1 in MCF-7 cells by enhancing its ubiquitin-dependent degradation.
Cyclin D1 ablation has been shown to provide specific protection against breast cancer and can overcome drug resistance by sensitizing these cells to apoptotic signals [16, 17]. Anti-cyclin D1 therapy may be thus be important for treating human breast cancer [18, 19]. Several HDAC inhibitors with structural similarity to TSA are currently in development or early phase clinical investigation [20–23]. We thus wished to investigate further, the mechanisms underlying the effect of TSA on cyclin D1 degradation in MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Cyclin D1 levels are elevated in this cell line as a result of its defective ubiquitin-dependent degradation . Here we provide further evidence for TSA-induced ubiquitin-dependent degradation of cyclin D1 and demonstrate that GSK3β-mediated nuclear export facilitates this activity. The development of HDAC inhibitors as small-molecule cyclin D1 ablative agents may thus be of clinical relevance.
TSA induces cyclin D1 26S proteasomal degradation
GSK3β-dependent nuclear export facilitates the Rapid TSA-induced degradation of Cyclin D1
We also investigated further, the effect of inhibiting CRM1-dependent nuclear export on TSA-induced cyclin D1 degradation. Treatment of MCF-7 cells with 5–10 ng / ml of leptomycin B alone for 6 h, did not lead to a significant increase in total cyclin D1 levels above those of vehicle control treated cells (Figure 3E). Nonetheless, pretreatment of MCF-7 cells with leptomycin B partially inhibited TSA-induced cyclin D1 degradation and the effect was maximal at 5 ng/ ml (Figure 3E). Inhibition of GSK3β did not result in changes in the level of cyclin D1 mRNA (Figure 3D). We noted that mutation of Thr286 to alanine (Figure 2B), "knockdown" of GSK3 by siRNA or nuclear export with leptomycin B (Figures 3A and 3E), all failed to induce significant cyclin D1 accumulation. Nonetheless, the ability of SB216763 and leptomycin B to partially inhibit TSA-induced cyclin D1 degradation demonstrates the active involvement of GSK3β-mediated nuclear export. These observations suggest that GSK3β-mediated nuclear export enhances the rate of TSA-induced cyclin D1 degradation in MCF-7 cells. The GSK3β-independent degradation of cyclin D1 has been described previously . In addition, we have demonstrated that the inhibition of 26S proteasomal degradation by MG132 results in the accumulation of both wild type and Thr286 mutant GFP-Cyclin D1 in MCF-7 cells (Figure 2B). It is thus possible that TSA can induce cyclin D1 degradation independently of GSK3β in this cell line.
Inhibition of TSA induced cyclin D1 degradation
In our previous work we found that TSA-induced cyclin D1 degradation is accompanied by Skp2 up-regulation and this activity can be abolished by Skp2 siRNA . The rapid degradation of cyclin D1 has been linked to its phosphorylation on Thr286 by GSK3β. The rapid decline of cyclin D1 during S phase is required for cell cycle progression and has been linked to CRM1-dependent nuclear export and ubiquitin-dependent degradation of the cyclin within the cytoplasm. CRM1-dependent nuclear export of cyclin D1 requires prior phosphorylation of residue Thr286 by GSK3β. It has therefore been proposed that GSK3β migrates into the nucleus at S phase where the kinase phosphorylates cyclin D1 leading to its rapid nuclear export and degradation within the cytoplasm. Although initial studies suggested that cyclin D1 ubiquitylation requires prior phosphorylation by GSK3β, cyclin D1 ubiquitylation can occur independently of this kinase [8, 10]. Consistent with this observation, cyclin D1 levels never rise significantly above that of normal cells even when greatly overexpressed at the mRNA level . In addition, cyclin D1b, a splice variant lacking the C-terminal sequence including Thr286, does not always exhibit enhanced protein stability . Interestingly, antizyme-induced cyclin D1 degradation occurs in spermidine treated cells via the 26S proteasome but does not require the prior polyubiquitylation of the cyclin . It should be noted however, that spermidine induced cyclin D1 degradation occurs at a slower rate than that observed following DNA damage or TSA treatment. The precise mechanisms that govern the regulation of cyclin D1 degradation thus remain unclear.
Our present findings suggest that the rapid TSA-induced degradation of cyclin D1 requires GSK3β activity. The inhibition of GSK3β- or CRM1-dependent nuclear export however, only partially inhibited the cyclin D1 degradation response to TSA. In contrast, MG132 completely abolished this protein loss. The underlying reasons for this differential effect are unclear but may due to GSK3β-independent or nuclear degradation of cyclin D1 [8, 9]. TSA-induced cyclin D1 degradation could also be inhibited by other 26S proteasome inhibitors such as lactacystin. In contrast, the inhibition of calpains or cathepsins did not affect TSA-induced cyclin D1 degradation.
Cyclin D1 degradation clearly occurs via the ubiquitin-dependent degradation pathway, and its degradation at S phase must therefore be closely liked to the activity of the E3 complexes that mediate its ubiquitylation. It is conceivable, that the up-regulation of a particular E3 complex or its activity and not an increase in GSK3β-mediated nuclear export that is responsible for the decline of cyclin D1 levels at S phase. Although the Skp2 E3 ligase has been linked to cyclin D1 degradation, the exact nature of this relationship remains unclear [13, 28]. In proliferating cells, Skp2 levels become elevated around the time cyclin D1 levels decline at the G1/S-phase boundary and Skp2 siRNA abolishes this decline. In addition, 26S proteasomes have been localized to both the cytoplasm and nucleus of mammalian cells . It is thus possible, that simply increasing the rate of cyclin D1 ubiquitylation would result in its increased degradation independent of nuclear export. We have shown previously, that TSA-induced cyclin D1 degradation in asynchronously growing MCF-7 cells is associated with a rise in Skp2 protein levels . It is also possible, that TSA induces the expression of other ubiquitin ligases involved in cyclin D1 degradation. We propose that treatment with TSA results in the increased ubiquitylation and degradation of cyclin D1 in MCF-7 cells. The rate of TSA induced cyclin D1 degradation is further enhanced by the constitutive phosphorylation of Thr286 by GSK3β, allowing for the subsequent nuclear export and degradation of polyubiquitylated cyclin D1 within the cytoplasm.
We noted that lactacystin was less effective than MG132 at inhibiting TSA-induced cyclin D1 degradation. The use of appropriate controls has thus been recommended when employing peptide aldehydes as proteasome inhibitors in cell culture studies . Agents that inhibit calpains and cysteine proteases but not proteasomes can be used to rule out the involvement of these proteins. In addition, the involvement of 26S proteasomes in mediating peptide aldehyde sensitive degradation can be confirmed with more specific proteasome inhibitors e.g. lactacystin and epoxomicin . The existence of additional protein degradation pathways has been suggested previously based on studies of protein degradation in rat skeletal muscle . ALLN but not lactacystin inhibited cyclin D1 loss induced by serum starvation or treatment with agents such as actinomycin D and lovastatin . Moreover, studies by Cotelle et al.,  have provided compelling evidence for the existence of an MG132 sensitive cytosolic protease. Our findings clearly implicate the ubiquitin-dependent degradation pathway in facilitating TSA-induced cyclin D1 degradation. We cannot however distinctly rule out at present, the possibility that TSA-induced cyclin D1 degradation can occur independently of GSK3β or 26S proteasomes.
Cyclin D1 has been shown to play an important role in breast cancer cell proliferation . Furthermore, cyclin D1 overexpression has been shown to confer resistance to antioestrogens in breast cancer cells  and has been identified as a negative predictive factor for tamoxifen response . Drug-induced cyclin D1 repression not only inhibits breast cancer cell proliferation but also sensitizes these cells to other agents such as CDK and Akt inhibitors . Cyclin D1 ablation thus presents an important therapeutic strategy for the treatment of human breast cancer. Thiazolidinediones and their derivatives have recently been shown to induce proteasome mediated proteolysis of cyclin D1 in MCF-7 cells . In contrast to TSA however, these compounds induce cyclin D1 degradation independently of GSK3β. Our observation that TSA induces cyclin D1 degradation suggests that HDAC inhibitors may also have therapeutic potential as cyclin D1 ablative agents. The identification of novel HDAC inhibitors with potent in vivo activity that induce cyclin D1 degradation is thus desirable and forms an active part of our current research focus.
In the present study, we have investigated further, the mechanisms whereby TSA induces cyclin D1 degradation on MCF-7 cells. We have demonstrated that TSA enhances cyclin D1 degradation at least in part through the ubiquitin-26S degradation pathway. In addition we have also identified GSK3β as an important mediator of TSA-induced cyclin D1 degradation via this pathway. Drug-induced cyclin D1 ablation protects against breast cancer development, inhibits cancer cell proliferation and thus presents an important therapeutic strategy for treating and/ or preventing breast cancer. The findings presented in this study suggest that HDAC inhibitors may have therapeutic potential as cyclin D1 ablative agents for the treatment of breast cancer.
Carbobenzoxy-leucyl-leucyl-leucinal (Z-LLL-CHO, MG132), N-acetyl-leucyl-leucyl-norleucinal (LLnL, ALLN, MG101), lactacystin, Z-Phe-Gly-NHO-Bz (Z-FG-NHO-Bz, Cathepsin inhibitor I, CATI-1), NIP-Leu3-vinyl sulphone (NLVS) and N- acetyl-leucyl-leucyl-methional (ALLM, Calpain Inhibitor II) (Calbiochem, VWR International Ltd., Lutterworth, United Kingdom) were dissolved in DMSO at appropriate concentrations and aliquots stored at -80°C. Stock solutions of TSA in ethanol, aqueous ammonium chloride (NH4Cl) and leptomycin B in 70% (v/v) methanol (Sigma-Aldrich; Dorset, United Kingdom) were stored at -20°C. The GSK3-specific inhibitor SB216763 (Tocris Bioscience, Avonmouth, United Kingdom) was dissolved in DMSO and stored at -20°C. Antibodies to cyclin D1, actin, Sp1 and GFP (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA), and β-Catenin (Transduction Laboratories, BD Biosciences Ltd., Oxford, United Kingdom) were used.
MCF-7 cells (American Type Culture Collection, Rockville, MD) were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal calf serum, 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 units/ml penicillin and 100 μg/ml streptomycin at 37°C in humidified 5% CO2.
The pEGFP-cyclin D1 plasmid vector was mutated to create pEGFP-cyclin D1T286A, pEGFP-cyclin D1T288A and pEGFP-cyclin D1T286A, T288A. Site-directed mutagenesis was performed using a QuikChange® II kit (Stratagene) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Mutation of T286A was achieved using the primer pair forward, 5'-TGGACCTGGCTTGCGCACCCACCGA-3', and reverse, 5'-TCGGTGGGTGCGCAAGCCAGGTCCA-3', and T288A using forward, 5'-TTGCACACCCGCCGACGTGCGGGAC-3', and reverse, 5'-AACGTGTGGGCGGCTGCACGCCCTG-3'. The T286A, T288A double mutant was generated by mutating the GFP-Cyclin D1T286A plasmid construct with the T288A primer pair.
Cells treated as indicated were harvested in 5 ml of medium, pelleted by centrifugation (1,000 × g for 5 min at 4°C), washed twice with ice-cold PBS and lysed in ice-cold HEPES buffer [50 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 10 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA, 10% (v/v) glycerol, 1% (v/v) Triton X-100 and a cocktail of protease inhibitors] on ice for 30 min. Lysates were clarified by centrifugation (15,000 × g for 10 min at 4°C) and the supernatants then either analyzed immediately or stored at -80°C. Equivalent amounts of protein (20–50 μg) from total cell lysates were resolved by SDS-PAGE using precast 4–12% Bis-Tris gradient gels (Invitrogen Ltd., Paisley, United Kingdom) and transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes (Hybond P; Amersham Biosciences United Kingdom Limited, Little Chalfont, United Kingdom) with a Novex XCell system (Invitrogen). Membranes were blocked overnight at 4°C in blocking buffer [5% (w/v) nonfat dried milk, 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris (pH 8.0) and 0.05% (v/v) Tween 20]. Proteins were detected by incubation with primary antibodies at appropriate dilutions in blocking buffer overnight at 4°C. Blots were then incubated at room temperature with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody. Bands were visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence (Supersignal West Pico; Perbio Science UK Ltd., Cheshire, United Kingdom) followed by exposure to autoradiography film (Kodak BioMax ML-light or MR-1).
Semi-quantitative RT-PCR analysis
For RT-PCR analyses, cells were washed with PBS buffer and lysed directly in the culture plate using RTL buffer (Oiagen). RNA was extracted using an RNeasy Kit (Qiagen) followed by cDNA synthesis and a 25 cycle PCR reaction using a One-Step RT-PCR kit (Qiagen). The annealing temperatures of the primers for Cyclin D1 amplification (Forward 5'-aacagaagtgcgaggaggag-3'; Reverse 5'-ctggcattttggagaggaag-3') was 55°C. GSK3β (Forward 5'-cagcaaggtgacaacagtgg-3'; Reverse 5'-ggaacatagtccagcaccaga-3') and CGI-128 (Forward 5'-ggaattccagcggtggtggttccgcg-3'; Reverse 5'-ccccccgggagctgggaccaggat-3') amplification the annealing temperatures were 58°C and 68°C respectively. Optimization reactions were carried out to ensure the reactions were within the exponential amplification window. Reaction products were resolved on 2 % agarose gels containing 10 μg/ml ethidium bromide and visualized with a UV transilluminatior.
siRNA/ Plasmid transfection
MCF-7 cells were transfected with commercially available siRNA oligonucleotide pools (Dharmacon, Perbio) using Oligofectamine transfection reagent (Invitrogen) as previously described . Fugene 6 transfection reagent (Roche Diagnostics Ltd, East Sussex, United Kingdom) was used for DNA plasmid transfection. Asynchronous cell populations at a density of 50–60% in 6-well plates or on coverslips were transfected with 1–2 μg of plasmid DNA, following the formation of lipid-DNA complexes for 20 min at room temperature in Optimem I medium (Invitrogen). Complexes were added directly to cells growing in 2 ml DMEM and incubated for 5 h followed by washing with PBS buffer and addition of fresh DMEM. Cells were normally used in experiments 24 h following transfection and the recombinant proteins detected by immunoblotting, or by fluorescent microscopy as previously described
- ALLM- N-acetyl-leucyl-leucyl-methional:
ALLN- N-acetyl-leucyl-leucyl-norleucinal, CATI-1- cathepsin inhibitor-1, DMEM- Dulbecco's modified eagle medium, DMSO- dimethyl sulphoxide, GSK3β- glycogen synthase 3 beta, HDAC- histone deacetylase, LLnL, LMB- Leptomycin B, NH4Cl- ammonium chloride, NLVS- NIP-Leu3-vinyl sulphone, PBS- phosphate buffered saline, RT-PCR- reverse transcription- polymerase chain reaction, TSA- trichostatin A, Z-FG-NHO-Bz- Z-Phe-Gly-NHO-Bz, Z-LLL-CHO- carbobenzoxy-leucyl-leucyl-leucinal,,.
Grant support was from Association for International Cancer Research (J.P.A. and D.M.V.), The Mandeville Trust (A.V.S.) and Cancer Research UK (E.W-F.L. and R.C.C.).
- Sherr CJ, Roberts JM: CDK inhibitors: positive and negative regulators of G1-phase progression. Genes Dev. 1999, 13: 1501-1512.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sherr CJ, Roberts JM: CDK inhibitors: positive and negative regulators of G1-phase progression. Genes Dev. 1999, 13 (12): 1501-1512.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Baldin V, Lukas J, Marcote MJ, Pagano M, Draetta G: Cyclin D1 is a nuclear protein required for cell cycle progression in G1. Genes Dev. 1993, 7: 812-821.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Guo Y, Yang K, Harwalkar J, Nye JM, Mason DR, Garrett MD, Hitomi M, Stacey DW: Phosphorylation of cyclin D1 at Thr 286 during S phase leads to its proteasomal degradation and allows efficient DNA synthesis. Oncogene. 2005, 24: 2599-2612. 10.1038/sj.onc.1208326View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Diehl JA, Cheng M, Roussel MF, Sherr CJ: Glycogen synthase kinase-3beta regulates cyclin D1 proteolysis and subcellular localization. Genes Dev. 1998, 12: 3499-3511.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Alt JR, Cleveland JL, Hannink M, Diehl JA: Phosphorylation-dependent regulation of cyclin D1 nuclear export and cyclin D1-dependent cellular transformation. Genes Dev. 2000, 14: 3102-3114. 10.1101/gad.854900PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Alt JR, Gladden AB, Diehl JA: p21(Cip1) Promotes cyclin D1 nuclear accumulation via direct inhibition of nuclear export. J Biol Chem. 2002, 277: 8517-8523. 10.1074/jbc.M108867200View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Diehl JA, Zindy F, Sherr CJ: Inhibition of cyclin D1 phosphorylation on threonine-286 prevents its rapid degradation via the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. Genes Dev. 1997, 11: 957-972.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Germain D, Russell A, Thompson A, Hendley J: Ubiquitination of free cyclin D1 is independent of phosphorylation on threonine 286. J Biol Chem. 2000, 275: 12074-12079. 10.1074/jbc.275.16.12074View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Solomon DA, Wang Y, Fox SR, Lambeck TC, Giesting S, Lan Z, Senderowicz AM, Conti CJ, Knudsen ES: Cyclin D1 splice variants. Differential effects on localization, RB phosphorylation, and cellular transformation. J Biol Chem. 2003, 278: 30339-30347. 10.1074/jbc.M303969200View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Agami R, Bernards R: Distinct initiation and maintenance mechanisms cooperate to induce G1 cell cycle arrest in response to DNA damage. Cell. 2000, 102: 55-66. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00010-6View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zou Y, Ewton DZ, Deng X, Mercer SE, Friedman E: Mirk/dyrk1B kinase destabilizes cyclin D1 by phosphorylation at threonine 288. J Biol Chem. 2004, 279: 27790-27798. 10.1074/jbc.M403042200View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Russell A, Thompson MA, Hendley J, Trute L, Armes J, Germain D: Cyclin D1 and D3 associate with the SCF complex and are coordinately elevated in breast cancer. Oncogene. 1999, 18: 1983-1991. 10.1038/sj.onc.1202511View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yu ZK, Gervais JL, Zhang H: Human CUL-1 associates with the SKP1/SKP2 complex and regulates p21(CIP1/WAF1) and cyclin D proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998, 95: 11324-11329. 10.1073/pnas.95.19.11324PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bashir T, Dorrello NV, Amador V, Guardavaccaro D, Pagano M: Control of the SCF(Skp2-Cks1) ubiquitin ligase by the APC/C(Cdh1) ubiquitin ligase. Nature. 2004, 428: 190-193. 10.1038/nature02330View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Alao JP, Lam EW, Ali S, Buluwela L, Bordogna W, Lockey P, Varshochi R, Stavropoulou AV, Coombes RC, Vigushin DM: Histone deacetylase inhibitor trichostatin A represses estrogen receptor alpha-dependent transcription and promotes proteasomal degradation of cyclin D1 in human breast carcinoma cell lines. Clin Cancer Res. 2004, 10: 8094-8104. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-1023View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wu K, Wang C, D'Amico M, Lee RJ, Albanese C, Pestell RG, Mani S: Flavopiridol and trastuzumab synergistically inhibit proliferation of breast cancer cells: association with selective cooperative inhibition of cyclin D1-dependent kinase and Akt signaling pathways. Mol Cancer Ther. 2002, 1: 695-706.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yu Q, Geng Y, Sicinski P: Specific protection against breast cancers by cyclin D1 ablation. Nature. 2001, 411: 1017-1021. 10.1038/35082500View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Huang JW, Shiau CW, Yang YT, Kulp SK, Chen KF, Brueggemeier RW, Shapiro CL, Chen CS: Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma-independent ablation of cyclin D1 by thiazolidinediones and their derivatives in breast cancer cells. Mol Pharmacol. 2005, 67: 1342-1348. 10.1124/mol.104.007732View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Arnold A, Papanikolaou A: Cyclin D1 in breast cancer pathogenesis. J Clin Oncol. 2005, 23: 4215-4224. 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.064View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Marson A, Lawn RM, Mikita T: Oxidized low density lipoprotein blocks lipopolysaccharide-induced interferon beta synthesis in human macrophages by interfering with IRF3 activation. J Biol Chem. 2004, 279: 28781-28788. 10.1074/jbc.M313207200View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Johnstone RW, Licht JD: Histone deacetylase inhibitors in cancer therapy: is transcription the primary target?. Cancer Cell. 2003, 4: 13-18. 10.1016/S1535-6108(03)00165-XView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Drummond DC, Noble CO, Kirpotin DB, Guo Z, Scott GK, Benz CC: Clinical development of histone deacetylase inhibitors as anticancer agents. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2005, 45: 495-528. 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.45.120403.095825View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Marson CM, Serradji N, Rioja AS, Gastaud SP, Alao JP, Coombes RC, Vigushin DM: Stereodefined and polyunsaturated inhibitors of histone deacetylase based on (2E, 4E)-5-arylpenta-2, 4-dienoic acid hydroxyamides. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2004, 14: 2477-2481. 10.1016/j.bmcl.2004.03.012View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Richardson PG: A review of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib in multiple myeloma. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2004, 5: 1321-1331. 10.1517/14656522.214.171.1241View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kisselev AF, Goldberg AL: Proteasome inhibitors: from research tools to drug candidates. Chem Biol. 2001, 8: 739-758. 10.1016/S1074-5521(01)00056-4View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lee DH, Goldberg AL: Proteasome inhibitors: valuable new tools for cell biologists. Trends Cell Biol. 1998, 8: 397-403. 10.1016/S0962-8924(98)01346-4View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Newman RM, Mobascher A, Mangold U, Koike C, Diah S, Schmidt M, Finley D, Zetter BR: Antizyme targets cyclin D1 for degradation. A novel mechanism for cell growth repression. J Biol Chem. 2004, 279: 41504-41511. 10.1074/jbc.M407349200View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ganiatsas S, Dow R, Thompson A, Schulman B, Germain D: A splice variant of Skp2 is retained in the cytoplasm and fails to direct cyclin D1 ubiquitination in the uterine cancer cell line SK-UT. Oncogene. 2001, 20: 3641-3650. 10.1038/sj.onc.1204501View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wojcik C, DeMartino GN: Intracellular localization of proteasomes. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2003, 35: 579-589. 10.1016/S1357-2725(02)00380-1View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tawa NEJ, Odessey R, Goldberg AL: Inhibitors of the proteasome reduce the accelerated proteolysis in atrophying rat skeletal muscles. J Clin Invest. 1997, 100: 197-203.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Choi YH, Lee SJ, Nguyen P, Jang JS, Lee J, Wu ML, Takano E, Maki M, Henkart PA, Trepel JB: Regulation of cyclin D1 by calpain protease. J Biol Chem. 1997, 272: 28479-28484. 10.1074/jbc.272.45.28479View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cotelle V, Meek SE, Provan F, Milne FC, Morrice N, MacKintosh C: 14-3-3s regulate global cleavage of their diverse binding partners in sugar-starved Arabidopsis cells. Embo J. 2000, 19: 2869-2876. 10.1093/emboj/19.12.2869PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hui R, Finney GL, Carroll JS, Lee CS, Musgrove EA, Sutherland RL: Constitutive overexpression of cyclin D1 but not cyclin E confers acute resistance to antiestrogens in T-47D breast cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2002, 62: 6916-6923.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stendahl M, Kronblad A, Ryden L, Emdin S, Bengtsson NO, Landberg G: Cyclin D1 overexpression is a negative predictive factor for tamoxifen response in postmenopausal breast cancer patients. Br J Cancer. 2004, 90: 1942-1948. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601831PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.