Oncolytic vaccinia therapy of squamous cell carcinoma
© Yu et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009
Received: 26 March 2009
Accepted: 06 July 2009
Published: 06 July 2009
Novel therapies are necessary to improve outcomes for patients with squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) of the head and neck. Historically, vaccinia virus was administered widely to humans as a vaccine and led to the eradication of smallpox. We examined the therapeutic effects of an attenuated, replication-competent vaccinia virus (GLV-1h68) as an oncolytic agent against a panel of six human head and neck SCC cell lines.
All six cell lines supported viral transgene expression (β-galactosidase, green fluorescent protein, and luciferase) as early as 6 hours after viral exposure. Efficient transgene expression and viral replication (>150-fold titer increase over 72 hrs) were observed in four of the cell lines. At a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 1, GLV-1h68 was highly cytotoxic to the four cell lines, resulting in ≥ 90% cytotoxicity over 6 days, and the remaining two cell lines exhibited >45% cytotoxicity. Even at a very low MOI of 0.01, three cell lines still demonstrated >60% cell death over 6 days. A single injection of GLV-1h68 (5 × 106 pfu) intratumorally into MSKQLL2 xenografts in mice exhibited localized intratumoral luciferase activity peaking at days 2–4, with gradual resolution over 10 days and no evidence of spread to normal organs. Treated animals exhibited near-complete tumor regression over a 24-day period without any observed toxicity, while control animals demonstrated rapid tumor progression.
These results demonstrate significant oncolytic efficacy by an attenuated vaccinia virus for infecting and lysing head and neck SCC both in vitro and in vivo, and support its continued investigation in future clinical trials.
It is estimated that over 35,000 new cases of squamous cell carcinoma involving the oral cavity or pharynx were diagnosed in the United States in 2008, and that these malignancies led to over 7,500 deaths that year . Despite refinements in the application of conventional cancer therapy modalities including radiation, chemotherapy, and surgery, the overall survival of patients with advanced head and neck squamous carcinoma remains limited . Novel therapeutic agents are needed to improve poor outcomes for patients with head and neck cancer who fail conventional therapy.
Oncolytic viral therapy is a promising approach to cancer treatment that relies on the natural ability of viruses to infect, replicate within, and ultimately lyse a host cell. A variety of viruses have been demonstrated to exhibit oncolytic properties including adenovirus, herpes simplex virus, Newcastle disease virus, vesicular stomatitis virus, reovirus, among others . Vaccinia has many favorable characteristics as an oncolytic virus, including the ability to infect a wide range of hosts, efficient infection and gene expression, and potent lytic activity . Vaccinia viral replication occurs exclusively in the cytoplasm, which eliminates the possibility of chromosomal integration. One of the most attractive features of vaccinia as a therapeutic agent is its long and established safety record in its widespread historical use in humans as a vaccine for smallpox. Interestingly, vaccinia virus appears to naturally possess an intrinsic ability to selectively target and infect cancer cells in vivo. The oncolytic activity of a recombinant, replication-competent vaccinia virus (GLV-1h68) in treating human thyroid cancer, breast cancer, malignant pleural mesothelioma, and pancreatic cancer was described before [6–10]. A GLV-1h68 derivative (GLV-1h99) that expresses the human nonepinephrine transporter was recently shown to be useful for both therapy and deep-tissue imaging of tumors [11, 12]. In the current study, we sought to assess the utility of applying GLV-1h68 as a therapeutic agent against human head and neck squamous cell carcinoma both in vitro and in vivo using a murine flank tumor model.
In vitro X-gal staining and GFP visualization
In vitro quantification of β-galactosidase and luciferase enzymatic activities
Low dose GLV-1h68 at an MOI of 0.1 (2 × 103 pfu) was added to the cell lines for a three day course to allow for measurement of viral replication. The four HNSCC cell lines (MSKQLL2, SCC15, MSKQLL1, SCC25) most sensitive to viral infection as demonstrated by β-galactosidase and luciferase assays also supported robust viral proliferation, ranging from a >330-fold increase in GLV-1h68 titer (SCC15) to a >150-fold increase (SCC25) over the 3-day period (Figure 2c). In contrast, the less sensitive MSK922 and MDA1386 cell lines demonstrated a ten-fold increase and an unchanged viral titer, respectively.
In vivo GLV-1h68 gene expression
Therapy of human SCC xenografts with GLV-1h68 in mice
Novel therapies are needed to make improvements in outcomes for patients afflicted with head and neck squamous cell carcinomas involving the upper aerodigestive tract . Agents with novel mechanisms of anti-tumoral activity would be particularly useful for the treatment of recurrent cancers that have developed resistance to radiation therapy or chemotherapy. Oncolytic viral therapy is a new approach to cancer treatment that harnesses a virus's natural ability to infect, replicate within, and lyse a host cell as part of its natural life cycle [3, 4].
Interestingly, there is compelling evidence that vaccinia virus may possess a natural affinity for infecting malignant tumors. Yu et al demonstrated that LIVP strain-derived vaccinia virus expressing Renilla luciferase and GFP was able to specifically infect C6 glioma, MB-49 murine bladder, and MCF-7 mammary neoplasms at 3 to 6 days after intravenous administration in mice . Imaging of GFP expression demonstrated localization of virus at neoplastic sites measuring as small as 0.5 mm. In contrast, intravenous vaccinia administered to non-tumor-bearing animals only showed weak and occasional uptake in small skin lesions, without evidence of significant internal fluorescence localization.
GLV-1h68 is an attenuated, replication-competent, oncolytic vaccinia virus. GLV-1h68 has a mutation in the J2R gene encoding thymidine kinase which may make viral replication dependent on host cell thymidine kinase . This attribute may create increased selectivity for malignant tumors but attenuate its ability to replicate in normal tissues. GLV-1h68 also carries an insertional mutation in hemagglutinin gene and the F14.5L locus. Inactivation of hemagglutinin is thought to reduce the virulence of vaccinia. F14.5L has a unique Not I site in F14.5L makes this locus suitable for insertion of the luciferase-GFP cassette. Lin et al showed that GLV-1h68 injections into established anaplastic thyroid tumors in murine flanks resulted in specific and prolonged luciferase expression within tumor tissues, while this was absent when GLV-1h68 was injected into normal tissue sites .
Our goal was to explore the potential utility of applying GLV-1h68 as a therapeutic agent for human head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. We examined the effects of GLV-1h68 in treating a panel of six human head and neck SCC cell lines in vitro. These six cell lines are of mucosal origin from the upper aerodigestive tract, and are commonly used to represent this disease. All six cell lines supported viral transgene expression (β-galactosidase, green fluorescent protein, luciferase) beginning as early as 6 hours after viral exposure. Highly efficient transgene expression and viral replication was observed in four of the six cell lines, suggesting that there are cancer cell factors that are determinants of permissiveness to vaccinia. The low dose of GLV-1h68 used in the viral replication studies was intended to allow assessment of maximal viral replication, and may have been insufficient to allow for initial infection of the less sensitive cell lines.
At an MOI of 1, GLV-1h68 was highly cytotoxic to four of the cell lines, resulting in ≥ 90% cytotoxicity over a 6-day period. Even at an extremely low MOI of 0.01, three cell lines still demonstrated > 60% cell death over 6 days. Therefore, half of SCC cell lines tested exhibited exquisite sensitivity to GLV-1h68. The other three SCC cell lines remained susceptible to oncolysis at higher doses of GLV-1h68, demonstrating that the virus may still exhibit efficacy at higher doses.
We found that markers of early gene expression by GLV-1h68 correlated well with susceptibility to oncolysis. β-galactosidase, GFP, and luciferase expression were all robust for MSKQLL2, SCC15, MSKQLL2, and SCC25; these were also the same cell lines that were also most sensitive to viral replication and oncolysis. These correlations suggest that initial viral entry and early gene expression by GLV-1h68 are important events that may define subsequent cytotoxic susceptibility to the virus. Clinically, this observation also suggests that luciferase imaging to visually track early viral activity in vivo may potentially have prognostic utility in predicting later tumor response to the virus. Bioluminescence imaging allows for the non-invasive detection of viral distribution and viral activity of GLV-1h68.
A single injection of intratumoral GLV-1h68 (5 × 106 pfu) in vivo into MSKQLL2 xenografts in mice exhibited localized intratumoral luciferase activity peaking at days 2–4, with gradual resolution over 10 days. Importantly, there was no evidence of viral spread to normal organs or non-tumor sites based on luciferase imaging, demonstrating tumor-specific viral replication and activity. Treated animals exhibited essentially complete tumor regression over a 24-day period without any observed toxicity, while control animals demonstrated rapid tumor progression requiring sacrifice by day 24. The lag period between the earlier resolution of GLV-1h68 luciferase activity and the later tumor volume regression might, in part, be explained by the additional time needed for the resorption of necrotic tumor tissue after effective oncolysis is completed. No animal treated with GLV-1h68 exhibited any morbidity attributable to the viral therapy. These results demonstrate that GLV-1h68 exhibits significant therapeutic efficacy leading to dramatic tumor regression without observed toxicity when delivered by intratumoral injection.
A major consideration in the development of a therapy using replication-competent viruses is the safety of its application in patients. Most oncolytic viruses such as adenovirus and herpes simplex virus are natural pathogens, and viral attenuation is necessary to make them safe for clinical use . In contrast, the widespread historical use of vaccinia as a vaccine for smallpox has convincingly demonstrated its safety for clinical application in humans. Toxicities related to vaccinia administration occur in less than 0.1% of cases, and may be effectively addressed with immunoglobulin administration  and other possible antivirals such as cidofovir  and ST-246 . The routine administration of vaccinia in the United States ended in 1972, and smallpox was officially declared eradicated in 1980. Therefore, the widespread historical clinical use of vaccinia virus in humans is strong evidence of its likely safety as a future cancer therapy agent. The additional genetic attenuation of GLV-1h68 may even further enhance its safety profile over wild type vaccinia virus. Our findings support the continued study of GLV-1h68 for treating head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in future clinical trials.
These results highlight the ability of GLV-1h68 to effectively infect, replicate within, and cause regression of human head and neck squamous cell carcinoma xenografts in mice. No treatment related morbidity or mortality was identified. Vaccinia was historically used widely as a smallpox vaccine with an excellent safety profile. GLV-1h68 is even further attenuated for safety, while maintaining potent antitumor activity. These data support the continued study of GLV-1h68 as an agent to treat patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in future clinical trials.
Virus and cell lines
GLV-1h68 is a recombinant, replication-competent vaccinia virus derived from the LIVP strain (Lister strain from the Institute for Research on Viral Preparations, Moscow). The construction of GLV-1h68 has been described before . GLV-1h68 contains four inserted cassettes encoding Renilla luciferase-green fluorescent protein fusion (RUC-GFP cassette), a reverse inserted human transferrin receptor (rTfr), β-galactosidase, and β-glucuronidase into the F14.5L, J2R (thymidine kinase), and A56R (hemagglutinin) loci of the viral genome, respectively.
Six human head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cell lines were studied: MSKQLL2, SCC15, MSKQLL1, SCC25, MDA1386, and MSK922. MDA1386 was grown in RPMI containing 10% FCS and 1% penicillin and streptomycin (P&S), all other cell lines were grown in MEM containing 10% FCS and 1% P&S. CV-1 African green monkey kidney cells used for viral tittering were grown in DMEM containing 10% FCS and 1% P&S. All cells were grown in a humidified incubator at 5% CO2 and 37°C.
In vitro X-gal staining and GFP visualization
Cells were seeded in 12 well plates for 6 hours and exposed to GLV-1h68 at an MOI of 1. At 6, 12, and 24 hours after virus infecton, cells were fixed in 1% glutaraldehyde and stained with X-Gal (1 mg/ml) in an iron solution of 5 mM K4Fe (CN)6, 5 mM K3Fe(CN)6 and 2 mM MgCl2 at 37°C for 2 hours. Photomicrographs were taken at 100 ×. At 12 and 24 hours, unfixed cells were imaged under a microscope with a GFP filter at 100 ×.
In vitro quantification of β-galactosidase activity
β-galactosidase expression was measured using the Enhanced β-Galactosidase Assay Kit (Gene Therapy Systems, San Diego, CA). Each cell line was plated in 96-well plates at 2 × 104 cells per well in 100 μl DMEM with 2% FCS media for 6 hours. GLV-1h68 in 100 μl media was added to each well at an MOI of 5. After 6 hours, media was aspirated and lysis buffer added to each well. Serial dilutions of β-galactosidase were used to create a standard reference curve. Substrate was added to each well and plates read by spectrophotometry (EL321e, Bio-Tek Instruments, Winooski, VT) at 570 nm. Samples were assayed in triplicate for each condition and mean values with standard errors reported.
In vitro quantification of luciferase activity
For luciferase assessment, cells were plated in 96-well plates at 1 × 104 cells per well and 6 hours later GLV-1h68 was added at an MOI of 1. 12 hours after infection, 0.25 μg coelenterazine (Biotium, Hayward, CA) in 50 μl PBS was added to each well for 10 minutes, and emitted photons were measured for 30 seconds with a cooled CCD camera (Xenogen IVIS, Xenogen, Alameda, CA). Images were analyzed by using Living Image® software (Xenogen). Samples were assessed in triplicate.
Viral plaque assays
To assess viral replication, 2 × 104 cells were seeded per well in 12-well plates in 1 ml media. After incubation for 6 hours, GLV-1h68 in 100 μl DMEM 2% FCS was added to each well at an MOI of 0.1 (2 × 103 pfu). Supernatant from each well was collected at 72 hours and frozen. CV-1 cells were grown to confluence on 6-well plates. Supernatant samples were thawed, and serial ten-fold dilutions incubated on the CV-1 cells for 4 hours. Wells were washed with media and covered with 1% agarose with media. After 48 hours of incubation, 2 mL of neutral red solution (2% by volume) was added and viral plaques were counted after 24 hours. Samples were assayed in triplicate for each condition and mean values with standard errors reported.
Each cell line was plated in 12-well plates. After incubation for 6 hours, virus in 100 μl DMEM with 2% FCS media was added to each well at an MOI of 0, 0.01, 0.1 and 1. After day 3, an additional 1 ml of fresh media was added to remaining wells. At daily intervals cells were washed with PBS and lysed with Triton X (1.35%, Sigma). Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) was measured using a Cytotox96 kit (Promega, Madison, WI) and measured by spectrophotometry (EL321e, Bio-Tek Instruments, Winooski, VT) at 450 nm. Results were expressed as the percentage of surviving cells determined from comparing the lactate dehydrogenase of each test sample to untreated samples considered 100% viable. Samples were assayed in triplicate for each condition and mean values with standard errors reported.
In vivo GLV-1h68 gene expression
In vivo experiments were performed under an approved animal protocol by the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Six-week-old male athymic nude mice (National Cancer Institute) were anesthetized with inhalational methoxyflurane. MSKQLL2 cells (5 × 106) in 100 μl of PBS were injected into the subcutaneous flanks. Established MSKQLL2 flank tumors were injected with GLV-1h68 (5 × 106 pfu) in 50 μl PBS. For luciferase assessment, 2.5 μg of coelenterazine (Biotium) in 95 μl PBS was injected via the retro-orbital sinus at varying times. Luciferase activity was detected with a cooled CCD camera (Xenogen IVIS). Emitted photons were measured for 60 seconds. Images were analyzed using Living Image® software (Xenogen).
For X-gal staining, at day 3 animals were sacrificed and flank tumors excised, frozen in Tissue Tek solution and sectioned (8 μm). Slides were fixed with 1% glutaraldehyde and stained with X-Gal (1 mg/ml) in an iron solution of 5 mM K4Fe (CN)6, 5 mM K3Fe(CN)6 and 2 mM MgCl2 at 37°C for 2 hours. Slides were counterstained with nuclear fast red. For GFP assessment, animals were sacrificed at day 3, tumors exposed surgically, and photography performed under a stereoscope (Leica MZFL3) with a GFP filter.
Therapy of human SCC xenografts with GLV-1h68 in mice
Animals with established MSKQLL2 flank tumors were distributed into two experimental groups (n = 5 per group) with similar starting tumor volumes. Flank tumors were treated with intratumoral injections of a single dose of GLV-1h68 (5 × 106 pfu) in 50 μl PBS, or 50 μl PBS alone as control. Tumor dimensions were serially measured with calipers and volumes calculated by the formula: volume = length × width2 × 0.4. Body weights were measured serially. Photographs of representative animals were taken at day 24. Animals were sacrificed by CO2 inhalation.
RJW is supported by a Clinical Innovator Award from the Flight Attendant Medical Research Institute and NIH grant R21DE019015. NC, YAY, QZ, AAS were supported by grants from Genelux Corporation (R&D facility in San Diego).
- Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Murray T, Thun MJ: Cancer statistics, 2008. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008, 58: 71-96. 10.3322/CA.2007.0010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vokes EE, Weichselbaum RR, Lippman SM, Hong WK: Head and neck cancer, 1993. N Engl J Med. 328: 184-191. 10.1056/NEJM199301213280306.
- Liu TC, Kirn D: Gene therapy progress and prospects cancer: oncolytic viruses. Gene Ther. 2008, 15: 877-884. 10.1038/gt.2008.72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shen Y, Neumunaitis J: Fighting cancer with vaccinia virus: teaching new tricks to an old dog. Mol Ther. 2005, 11: 180-195. 10.1016/j.ymthe.2004.10.015.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yu YA, Shabahang S, Timiryasova TM, Zhang Q, Beltz R, Gentschev I, Goebel W, Szalay AA: Visualization of tumors and metastases in live animals with bacteria and vaccinia virus encoding light-emitting proteins. Nat Biotechnol. 2004, 22: 313-320. 10.1038/nbt937.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhang Q, Yu YA, Wang E, Chen N, Danner RL, Munson PJ, Marincola FM, Szalay AA: Eradication of solid human breast tumors in nude mice with an intravenously injected light-emitting oncolytic vaccinia virus. Cancer Res. 2007, 67: 10038-10046. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-0146.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lin SF, Yu Z, Riedl C, Woo Y, Zhang Q, Yu YA, Timiryasova T, Chen N, Shah JP, Szalay AA, Fong Y, Wong RJ: Treatment of anaplastic thyroid carcinoma in vitro with a mutant vaccinia virus. Surgery. 2007, 142: 976-983. 10.1016/j.surg.2007.09.017.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lin SF, Price DL, Chen CH, Brader P, Li S, Gonzalez L, Zhang Q, Yu YA, Chen N, Szalay AA, Fong Y, Wong RJ: Oncolytic vaccinia virotherapy of anaplastic thyroid cancer in vivo. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008, 93: 4403-4407. 10.1210/jc.2008-0316.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kelly KJ, Woo Y, Brader P, Yu Z, Riedl C, Lin SF, Chen N, Yu YA, Rusch VW, Szalay AA, Fong Y: Novel oncolytic agent GLV-1h68 is effective against malignant pleural mesothelioma. Hum Gene Ther. 2008, 19: 774-82. 10.1089/hum.2008.036.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yu YA, Galanis C, Woo Y, Chen N, Zhang Q, Fong Y, Szalay AA: Regression of human pancreatic tumor xenografts in mice after a single systemic injection of recombinant vaccinia virus GLV-1h68. Mol Cancer Ther. 2009, 8: 141-151. 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-08-0533.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chen N, Zhang Q, Yu YA, Stritzker J, Brader P, Schirbel A, Samnick S, Serganova I, Blasberg R, Fong Y, Szalay AA: A novel recombinant vaccinia virus expressing the human norepinephrine transporter retains oncolytic potential and facilitates deep tissue imaging. Mol Med. 2009, 15: 144-151.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brader P, Kelly K, Chen N, Yu YA, Zhang Q, Zanzonico P, Burnazi EM, Ghani ER, Serganova I, Hricak H, Szalay AA, Fong Y, Blasberg R: Imaging a genetically engineered oncolytic vaccinia virus (GLV-1h99) using a human norepinephrine transporter (hNET) reporter gene. Clin Cancer Res. 2009, 15: 3791-801. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-3236.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sharp JC, Fletcher W: Experience of anti-vaccina immunoglobulin in the United Kingdom. Lancet. 1973, 1: 656-659. 10.1016/S0140-6736(73)92215-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Neyts J, Leyssen P, Verbeken E, De Clercq E: Efficacy of cidofovir in a murine model of disseminated progressive vaccinia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004, 48: 2267-73. 10.1128/AAC.48.6.2267-2273.2004.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yang G, Pevear DC, Davies MH, Collett MS, Bailey T, Rippen S, Barone L, Burns C, Rhodes G, Tohan S, Huggins JW, Baker RO, Buller RL, Touchette E, Waller K, Schriewer J, Neyts J, DeClercq E, Jones K, Hruby D, Jordan R: An orally bioavailable antipoxvirus compound (ST-246) inhibits extracellular virus formation and protects mice from lethal orthopoxvirus challenge. J Virol. 2005, 79: 13139-49. 10.1128/JVI.79.20.13139-13149.2005.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.