Skip to main content

Advertisement

  • Research
  • Open Access
  • Variation in transcriptional regulation of cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor p21waf1/cip1 among human bronchogenic carcinomas

    • 1,
    • 1,
    • 1,
    • 2,
    • 1 and
    • 1Email author
    Molecular Cancer20054:23

    https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-4598-4-23

    • Received: 14 February 2005
    • Accepted: 13 July 2005
    • Published:

    Abstract

    Background

    Cell proliferation control depends in part on the carefully ordered regulation of transcription factors. The p53 homolog p73, contributes to this control by directly upregulating the cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor, p21waf1/cip1. E2F1, an inducer of cell proliferation, directly upregulates p73 and in some systems upregulates p21 directly. Because of its central role in controlling cell proliferation, upregulation of p21 has been explored as a modality for treating bronchogenic carcinoma (BC). Improved understanding of p21 transcriptional regulation will facilitate identification of BC tissues that are responsive to p21-directed therapies. Toward this goal, we investigated the role that E2F1 and p73 each play in the transcriptional regulation of p21.

    Results

    Among BC samples (N = 21) p21 transcript abundance (TA) levels varied over two orders of magnitude with values ranging from 400 to 120,000 (in units of molecules/106 molecules β-actin). The p21 values in many BC were high compared to those observed in normal bronchial epithelial cells (BEC) (N = 18). Among all BC samples, there was no correlation between E2F1 and p21 TA but there was positive correlation between E2F1 and p73α (p < 0.001) TA. Among BC cell lines with inactivated p53 and wild type p73 (N = 7) there was positive correlation between p73α and p21 TA (p < 0.05). Additionally, in a BC cell line in which both p53 and p73 were inactivated (H1155), E2F1 TA level was high (50,000), but p21 TA level was low (470). Transiently expressed exogenous p73α in the BC cell line Calu-1, was associated with a significant (p < 0.05) 90% increase in p21 TA and a 20% reduction in E2F1 TA. siRNA mediated reduction of p73 TA in the N417 BC cell line was associated with a significant reduction in p21 TA level (p < 0.01).

    Conclusion

    p21 TA levels vary considerably among BC patients which may be attributable to 1) genetic alterations in Rb and p53 and 2) variation in TA levels of upstream transcription factors E2F1 and p73. Here we provide evidence that p73 upregulates p21 TA in BC tissues and upregulated p21 TA may result from E2F1 upregulation of p73 but not from E2F1 directly.

    Keywords

    • Transcript Abundance
    • Bronchial Epithelial Cell
    • Bronchogenic Carcinoma
    • Normal Human Bronchial Epithelial Cell
    • Lower Detection Threshold

    Background

    Cell cycle homeostasis in normal human bronchial epithelial cells (BEC) is highly regulated at the G1/S transition. In G1 phase of the cell cycle, formation of a heterodimeric complex between cyclin D and cyclin dependent kinases 4 or 6 (cdk 4,6) leads to the phosphorylation of the tumor suppressor retinoblastoma gene product (pRb) [13]. Phosphorylation causes conformational change of the pRb/E2F complex, followed by release, and activation of the E2F1, 2, and 3 transcription factors [46]. Free E2F proteins bind strongly to DNA and were first identified by their ability to transactivate the adenoviral E2 promoter [7]. E2F1 functions to upregulate transcription of genes required for entry into S phase, including cyclin E, c-myc and itself [810]. In turn, c-myc directly upregulates transcription of cyclin E and cdk4 [11, 12]. Thus, phosphorylation of pRb by one or more cyclin/cdk complexes causes activation and upregulation of E2F1, upregulation of c-myc transcription by E2F1, and upregulation of cdk4 transcription by c-myc. These interactions are initiated at the restriction point of G1/S, which is associated with independence of the cell from extracellular growth factors [4, 13]. The events described above contribute to a cell proliferation signal amplification cycle that would be uncontrolled in the absence of compensatory negative feedback.

    Compensatory feedback signals, including the activation of p53 and transcriptional upregulation of p73 and p21waf1/cip1 (p21 hereafter) act to slow cell proliferation [1416]. Unlike p53, p73 is not frequently mutated in human cancers [17], and thus it is not considered a classical tumor suppressor gene, as defined by Knudson's two hit hypothesis [18, 19]. However, it functions to promote cell cycle arrest, DNA repair, and apoptosis much like p53 [18, 20]. E2F1 (and c-myc) transactivation of p14ARF leads to stabilization of p53 [21, 22] which slows cell cycling through the upregulation of p21 [23, 24], and also induces apoptosis [25]. E2F1 also upregulates p73 [15, 26, 27] and p73 upregulates p21 [15], which in turn acts to inhibit the release of E2F1 from pRb, resulting in compensatory feedback for the loss of cell proliferation control. In some systems, E2F1 also upregulates p21 directly [28].

    In previous studies, we determined that p21 transcript abundance (TA) levels vary considerably among bronchogenic carcinoma (BC) primary tissues and cell lines, and in some of these samples the p21 TA level is higher than the level observed in normal BEC [29, 30]. Because p21 normally slows cell proliferation, this observation was unexpected, and counter-intuitive. If validated, these preliminary findings would have important implications for the many efforts presently underway to design gene specific cancer treatments that function to achieve cell proliferation control [31].

    The purpose of this study was to better understand inter-tumor variation in the mechanisms responsible for loss of proliferation control and to better define the role of E2F1, p73 and p21 regulatory pathways as they relate to cell proliferation control in human BC. Our approach included additional descriptive studies in BC cell lines, as well as primary BC tissues and normal BEC to better quantify inter-tumor variation of p21 TA levels. With respect to the fourteen BC cell lines used in this study, because each has been extensively characterized at the genetic level [17, 25, 3235], we were better able to define the regulatory relationship between E2F1, p73, and p21 after considering the known alterations in each individual cell line. Our descriptive approach was followed by experimental testing of the hypothesis posed to explain these observations.

    Results

    Transcript abundance (TA) levels of E2F1, p73α, and p21 in normal bronchial epithelial cells (BEC) (N = 18) and bronchogenic carcinoma (BC) tissues (N = 21) were measured by StaRT-PCR. Cultured cells and primary tissues are shown in Tables 1 and 2, respectively. For the BC cell lines, known alterations in p53, p16, p14ARF, Rb, p73, and c-myc also are presented, along with the TA values. Bivariate analysis of the TA data from these cultured human BEC samples provided data consistent with observations in other tissues that E2F1 regulates p73 transcription [15, 26, 27] and that p73 regulates p21 transcription [15]. However, in contrast to other cell types, they suggested that E2F1 does not directly regulate p21 transcription. To further investigate the significance of this finding, seven primary BC tissues (Table 2) were also assessed.
    Table 1

    Transcript abundance measurements for cultured normal BEC and BC cell lines

    Sample

    Cell Type

    Medium

    Genetic Alterations

    Transcript Abundance

       

    p53

    p16

    p14 ARF

    Rb

    p73

    c-myc

    E2F1

    p73α

    p21

    17378B

    N

    B

          

    1,500

    1

    21,000

    6F0333B

    N

    B

          

    4,700

    1

    76,000

    6F0395B

    N

    B

          

    5,100

    1

    120,000

    SW900

    Sq

    R

     

    I

        

    7,300

    100

    12,000

    Calu-1

    Sq

    R

    I

    I

        

    8,500

    28

    2,000

    H460

    LC

    R

     

    I

        

    9,000

    14

    18,000

    H82

    SC

    R

    I

     

    I

    I

     

    A

    15,000

    17

    400

    A549

    A

    R

     

    I

    I

       

    16,000

    1

    6,200

    A2126

    A

    R

    I

         

    17,000

    30

    6,100

    N417

    SC

    R

    I

      

    I

     

    A

    19,000

    5,200

    34,000

    H322

    BA

    R

    I

    I

        

    20,000

    190

    31,000

    H446

    SC

    R

       

    I

     

    A

    67,000

    710

    120,000

    H1155*

    LC

    R

    I

      

    I

    I

     

    50,000

    250

    470

    H520

    Sq

    R

    I

    I

        

    56,000

    120

    2,300

    H146

    SC

    R

       

    I

      

    59,000

    700

    19,000

    H661

    LC

    R

    I

    I

        

    76,000

    210

    58,000

    A427**

    A

    R

     

    I

        

    180,000

    220

    100,000

    N, normal; Sq, squamous carcinoma; LC, large cell carcinoma; SC, small cell carcinoma; A, adenocarcinoma; BA, bronchoalveolar carcinoma; B, BEGM medium; R, RPMI with 10% FBS; I, inactivated; A, amplification. Non-detectable TA were entered as 1 to allow plotting on a logarithmic scale. Cell lines are grouped by increasing E2F1 TA. All values are in units of molecules/106 molecules β-actin and represent the mean from three independent measurements. *H1155 has a missense mutation in the transactivation domain of p73. **A427 has a deletion in the p73 coding sequence but the protein product still retains its transactivational function [35].

    Table 2

    Transcript abundance measurements for primary normal BEC and BC tissues

    Sample ID

    Diagnosis

    Cell Type

    E2F1

    p73α

    p21

    63

    NC

    N

    270

    850

    14,000

    282

    NC

    N

    540

    640

    10,000

    64

    NC

    N

    2,000

    400

    10,000

    285

    NC

    N

    2,500

    870

    3,100

    257

    NC

    N

    270

    5,200

    12,000

    156

    NC

    N

    750

    1,000

    25,000

    194

    NC

    N

    290

    3,800

    3,500

    150

    NC

    N

    160

    3,700

    11,000

    136

    NC

    N

    700

    31

    9,100

    261

    NC

    N

    250

    3,100

    30,000

    191

    C

    N

    150

    900

    13,000

    158

    C

    N

    190

    2,200

    11,000

    146

    C

    N

    230

    2,600

    9,100

    34

    C

    N

    570

    4,400

    12,000

    212

    C

    N

    600

    5,300

    35,000

    274

    C

    Sq

    730

    1

    7,000

    279

    C

    A

    1,200

    1

    4,000

    190

    C

    BA

    6,600

    3

    27,000

    102

    C

    A

    12,000

    21

    21,000

    165

    C

    SC

    36,000

    4,300

    16,000

    123

    C

    Sq

    54,000

    5,500*

    90,000

    277*

    C

    A

    120,000

    100

    2,000

    NC, non-cancer; C, cancer; N, normal; Sq, squamous carcinoma; A, adenocarcinoma; BA, bronchoalveolar carcinoma; SC, small cell carcinoma. Non-detectable TA were entered as 1 to allow plotting on a logarithmic scale. Normal BEC are grouped by diagnosis and cell type. BC tissues are grouped by increasing E2F1 TA. All values are in units of molecules/106 molecules β-actin and represent the mean from three independent measurements. *This value represents the mean from two measurements due to insufficient sample.

    The mean, median, and quartile values for each gene in normal (N = 18) compared to malignant samples (N = 21) are shown in Table 3. E2F1 TA levels were over 30-fold higher in BC relative to normal BEC (p < 0.0001). Conversely, mean p73α TA was higher in normal BEC by over 2-fold, but this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.07), although the median p73 TA value was higher in normal BEC by nearly 9-fold. With respect to p21 TA level, there was no statistical difference in the mean value between the two groups.
    Table 3

    Descriptive statistics for E2F1, p73α, and p21 transcript abundance measurements

    Normal BEC

    Bronchogenic Carcinoma

     

    E2F1

    p73α

    p21

     

    E2F1

    p73α

    p21

    Mean

    1,200

    1,900

    24,000

    Mean

    40,000

    840

    25,000

    Min

    150

    1

    3,100

    Min

    730

    1

    400

    LQ

    260

    460

    10,000

    LQ

    9,000

    17

    4,000

    Median

    560

    950

    12,000

    Median

    19,000

    100

    12,000

    UQ

    1,300

    3,600

    24,000

    UQ

    56,000

    250

    27,000

    Max

    5,100

    5,300

    120,000

    Max

    180,000

    5,500

    120,000

    Min, minimum; LQ, lower quartile; UQ, upper quartile; max, maximum. Values were derived from statistical analysis of samples presented in Tables 1 and 2.

    Median and quartile values were used to determine if TA levels were high or low for a given sample. For example, the median value for E2F1 in BC was 19,000. Therefore, a sample with an E2F1 TA level greater than 19,000 would be considered high and a TA level less than 19,000 would be considered low. These criteria were used to identify cell lines with low (Calu-1) or high (N417) p73α TA for use in the exogenous p73 and p73 siRNA transfection experiments.

    Bivariate analysis of E2F1 and p21

    There was no significant correlation between E2F1 and p21 TA levels among BC cell lines and primary tissues (N = 21) (Figure 1).
    Figure 1
    Figure 1

    Lack of correlation between E2F1 and p21 TA. There was no correlation between E2F1 and p21 TA among BC cell lines (N = 14) and primary BC tissues (N = 7). Each point represents the mean value from triplicate measurements of E2F1 and p21 as shown in Tables 1 and 2 (except where indicated).

    Bivariate analysis of E2F1 and p73α TA levels

    E2F1 and p73α TA values were positively correlated (p < 0.001) among BC cell lines and primary tissues (N = 21) (Figure 2).
    Figure 2
    Figure 2

    Bivariate analysis of E2F1 and p73α TA. E2F1 and p73α TA were positively correlated among BC cell lines (N = 14) and primary BC tissues (N = 7). Each point represents the mean value from triplicate measurements of E2F1 and p73α as shown in Tables 1 and 2 (except where indicated).

    Bivariate analysis of p73α and p21 TA levels

    Among BC cell lines in which p53 is known to be completely inactivated by mutation or deletion (N = 7), p73α and p21 were significantly correlated (p < 0.05), as shown in Figure 3. In contrast, there was a borderline but insignificant (p = 0.06) positive correlation between p73α and p21 TA among all BC cell lines and primary tissues (N = 21). This result may be explained by p53 regulation of p21 transcription as a confounding variable in those cell lines with wild type p53.
    Figure 3
    Figure 3

    Bivariate analysis of p73α and p21 TA. p73α and p21 TA were positively correlated (p < 0.05) among BC cell lines (N = 7) where p53 was known to be inactivated by mutation or deletion and p73 was wild type. Each point represents the mean value from triplicate measurements of p73α and p21 as shown in Table 1.

    E2F1 and p21 TA analysis in BC cell line with inactivated p53 and p73

    In the H1155 cell line in which p53 and p73 are both inactivated, E2F1 TA level was high, yet p21 TA level was low (Table 1). Consistent with our observation that E2F1 and p73α are correlated in BC tissues (Figure 2), E2F1 and p73α TA levels were both high in H1155. However, the missense mutation in the DNA binding domain of p73 inhibits its transactivational function [35]. Thus, H1155 is a cell line with a naturally occurring p73 mutation that directly supports our hypothesis that p21 is not upregulated by E2F1 directly.

    Expression of exogenous p73α is associated with increased p21 and decreased E2F1 TA in Calu-1

    To test the hypothesis that p21 transcription is regulated by p73 and not by E2F1 directly, p73α was transiently expressed in the squamous carcinoma cell line Calu-1. This line expresses low levels of endogenous p73α TA (28), low levels of p21 TA (2,000), and low levels of E2F1 TA (8,500). p73α TA was induced over 1,000-fold relative to the mock, 24 hours post-transfection (Figure 4A). Exogenous p73 protein expression was confirmed by Western analysis using an anti-HA antibody specific for an amino terminal tag on p73 (Figure 4B). p21 and E2F1 TA levels were quantified 24 hours post-transfection. While p21 TA was upregulated 90% (p < 0.001) relative to mock-transfected cells, there was a 20% downregulation (p < 0.05) of E2F1 TA (Figure 4C).
    Figure 4
    Figure 4

    Effect of p73α transient expression on p73α, p21, and E2F1 TA in Calu-1 cells. A) p73α TA was induced by over 3 orders of magnitude relative to mock transfected cells. Calu-1 cells were transfected with 5 μg of GFP control plasmid or HA-p73α. B) Total HA-p73 protein was analyzed in mock or p73α transfected cells. 20 μg of lysate were blotted on a PDVF membrane and incubated with an anti-hemagglutinin primary antibody conjugated to HRP. C) p21 was upregulated by 90% and E2F1 was reduced by 20% in p73α transfected cells. Results represent the mean value from triplicate measurements from three independent experiments. Error bars represent the S.E.M. RNA was extracted 24 hours post-transfection and treated with DNaseI. RNA was PCR amplified to rule out the possibility of plasmid contamination. No PCR products were detected.

    Gene specific silencing of p73 associated with decreased p21 TA level

    According to bivariate analysis shown in Figure 3, p73α and p21 were significantly correlated in cell lines that have inactivated p53. Therefore, we anticipated that gene specific silencing of p73 in one of these lines would directly reduce p21 TA. We used a pool of siRNAs to target all isoforms of p73 in the null-p53 small cell carcinoma N417. This cell line is an appropriate model because it expresses high p21 (34,000), E2F1 (19,000), and endogenous p73α (5,200) TA levels. p73α TA decreased by 80% relative to the non-specific siRNA control (p < 0.05), while p21 TA decreased by 70% (p < 0.01).

    Discussion

    Relative to normal bronchial epithelial cells (BEC), p21 is upregulated in some bronchogenic carcinoma (BC) tissues and downregulated in others (Tables 1, 2, and 3). Elevation of p21 TA in malignant cells may seem counter-intuitive because it would be expected to slow cell proliferation. However, in some tumors pRb is dysfunctional and feedback signals such as p73 upregulation by E2F1 may increase p21 transcription in an ineffective attempt to prevent phosphorylation of pRb and release of activated E2F1. It is likely that such tumors would be poor candidates for therapy intended to control cell proliferation through specific upregulation of p21 transcription. However, in other tumors, such as those with a genetic profile similar to that of A549 or Calu-1 (Table 1), pRb is intact, and TA levels of E2F1, p73, and p21 are all low. In a tumor such as this, there is reason to believe that the upregulation of p21 transcription would be an effective treatment. However, in order to develop effective p21 gene-specific therapeutics, and biomarkers that predict which tumor will respond, it is necessary to better understand p21 transcriptional regulation.

    In some cell types, E2F1 directly regulates p21 [28], however, the data presented here support the hypothesis that E2F1 does not upregulate p21 directly in human BC, but rather, elevated p21 TA results from E2F1 upregulation of p73. This hypothesis, generated initially from empirical observation, is supported by experimental data. There were four supportive empirical observations. First, there was lack of correlation between E2F1 and p21 TA among BC tissues. Second, there was positive correlation among BC tissues between E2F1 and p73 TA. Third, there was positive correlation between p73 and p21 TA among BC cell lines with inactivated p53. Fourth, in the H1155 BC cell line, in which p53 and p73 are inactivated, E2F1 and p73 TA levels were high, but p21 TA level was low. If E2F1 upregulated p21 directly, it would be reasonable to expect that p21 would be upregulated in this cell line, not downregulated.

    In experiments designed to directly test this hypothesis, transient exogenous expression of p73α was associated with increased p21 and decreased E2F1 TA levels and siRNA mediated silencing of p73 was associated with decreased p21 TA levels. Although the siRNA experiments support our hypothesis, they are not as supportive as the transient transfection experiments because E2F1 TA was reduced along with p73 and p21. We speculate that this decrease was due to a non-specific effect of the siRNAs. A non-specific effect of the siRNA method has been previously reported for cell cycling genes, including p53 and p21 [36].

    Conclusion

    In this study, we provide strong empirical and experimental evidence that in human bronchogenic carcinoma, p21 transcription is regulated by p73 but, in contrast to other cell types, not directly by E2F1. This knowledge will facilitate a) development of p21 gene-specific therapeutics necessary for individualized treatment strategies, and b) discovery of biomarkers that will predict which tumors will respond to p21 gene-specific therapeutics.

    Methods

    Normal cell populations

    Normal BEC stock populations (lot numbers: 17378, 6F0333, 6F0395) were obtained from Clonetics (San Diego, CA) and incubated in BEGM medium.

    Carcinoma cell lines

    Fourteen BC cell lines (Table 1) were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (Rockville, MD) and incubated in RPMI with 10% FBS.

    Culture conditions

    Normal BEC and BC cells proliferate optimally under different conditions [37]. The medium that is optimal for BC cell lines, RPMI with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), induces terminal squamous differentiation in normal BEC [38]. In contrast, BC cell lines do not divide in serum-free media that are optimal for proliferation of normal BEC. BC cell lines were incubated in RPMI with 10% FBS and normal BEC from three individuals were incubated in bronchial epithelial growth medium (BEGM). In order to directly compare with carcinoma cell lines under the same optimal conditions, normal BEC cell populations (17378, 6F0333, 6F0395) were also incubated for 24 hours in RPMI with 10% FBS.

    Primary tissue samples

    Primary normal BEC and primary BC samples (Table 2) were obtained under IRB approved protocols as previously described [29, 39, 40]. In each case informed consent was obtained from the patient.

    RNA extraction and reverse transcription

    Total RNA was extracted by phenol/chloroform methods using TRI-Reagent (Molecular Research Center, Inc., Cincinnati, OH). Approximately 1 μg of total RNA was reverse transcribed using oligo dTs and MMLV-reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen, Inc., Carlsbad, CA).

    Transcript abundance measurement

    Transcript abundance (TA) was measured by Standardized RT (StaRT)-PCR [30, 41, 42]. With this method there is an internal standard, within a standardized mixture of internal standards (SMIS) for each gene amplified in the PCR reaction. This enables regular assessment of performance characteristics as recommended by recent FDA guidelines [43]. Among these performance characteristics are reproducibility, lower detection threshold, linear dynamic range, signal to analyte response, false negatives, and false positives. For each gene measured in this study, the lower detection threshold was less than 10 molecules and the linear dynamic range was less than 10 to greater than 107 molecules. False negatives are eliminated due to the presence of an internal standard and false positives are eliminated by using a water control to ensure that there is no contamination within the PCR reaction.

    The reagents for analysis of E2F1 and p21 were commercially prepared (Gene Express, Inc., Toledo, OH). To analyze p73, a SMIS containing internal standards for only p73 and β-actin were prepared in this laboratory, because p73 is not in a commercially available SMIS. p73 forward and reverse primers amplify at least four distinct isoforms including α-δ, but do not distinguish between the full-length and ΔN transcripts. A separate pair of primers published by Kartasheva, et al. [44] were used to determine the presence of ΔNp73. The internal standard for p73 was prepared using the forward primer and a competitive template (CT) primer. The CT primer hybridizes upstream of the reverse primer but retains its sequence at the 5' end [45]. This enables the simultaneous amplification of the internal standard and endogenous native template (NT) using only the forward and reverse primers. p73 forward and reverse primer sequences are as follows: p73 F, 5' ACT TTG AGA TCC TGA TGA AG 3' R, 5' CAG ATG GTC ATG CGG TAG TG 3'. Primer sequences for p21 and E2F1 were previously reported [30].

    Six SMISs (A-F) were used for all TA measurements, with p73 CT at concentrations ranging from 10-12 (SMIS A) to 10-17 M (SMIS F) and β-actin CT constant at 10-13 M in all six SMISs. The dilution of each cDNA sample that contained 60,000 molecules of β-actin cDNA was determined through calibration to 1 μL of SMIS F. Such calibrated samples were then used in all StaRT-PCR experiments. In some experiments, if the amount of cDNA sample available was low, the cDNA and the SMIS were both diluted 10-fold. Equal volumes of cDNA and SMIS were combined in a master mix along with 30 mM MgCl2 (Idaho Technology, Inc., Idaho Falls, ID), 2 mM dNTPs, Taq Polymerase (Promega, Madison, WI), and RNase-free water. For each TA measurement, a 10 μL reaction volume was PCR amplified in a Rapidcycler (Idaho Technology, Inc., Idaho Falls, ID) for 35 cycles. PCR reactions were denatured for 5 seconds at 94°C, annealed for 10 seconds at 58°C, and elongated for 15 seconds at 72°C.

    Plasmid DNA

    A pcDNA 3.0 (Invitrogen Inc., Carlsbad, CA) expression vector was kindly provided from the laboratory of Vincenzo DeLaurenzi (University of Rome, Italy). The p73 gene contains a hemagglutinin tag sequence and is regulated by a CMV promoter sequence. An expression vector encoding a CMV regulated green fluorescent protein was obtained from (Gene Therapy Systems, San Diego, CA), and used as a negative control (mock) and determinant for transfection efficiency.

    Transient transfection assays

    Calu-1 cells were incubated in RPMI supplemented with 10% FBS and grown to confluence. Twenty-four hours prior to transfection, cells were trypsinized and transferred to 60 mm dishes. For transfections, 5 μg of plasmid DNA was diluted in 0.5 mL of serum-free medium with the appropriate concentration of Lipofectamine 2000 transfection reagent (Invitrogen, Inc., Carlsbad, CA). Cells were incubated with DNA-lipid complexes in serum-containing medium for 4–8 hours and subsequently treated with fresh medium. RNA was isolated 24 hours post-transfection and analyzed by StaRT-PCR. 60 molecules of p73 internal standard were sufficient to quantify endogenous p73α TA and 6,000 molecules were required to quantify the combined endogenous and exogenous transcript. To exclude the possibility that the high level measured was partly due to amplification of contaminating plasmid DNA, RNA from p73α transfected Calu-1 cells was PCR-amplified with p73 specific primers. No PCR product was observed.

    Western blot analysis

    Calu-1 cells were lysed 24 hours post-transfection by three consecutive freeze-thaws in a 0.25 M Tris lysis buffer (Invitrogen, Inc., Carlsbad, CA). Total protein concentration was determined colorimetrically using the bicinchoninic acid (BCA) assay (Pierce, Inc., Rockford, IL). 20 μg of total protein from Calu-1 cells were loaded on a 7% SDS Tris Acetate NuPage gel (Invitrogen, Inc., Carlsbad, CA). Proteins were transferred to a PVDF membrane and incubated with an anti-HA primary antibody conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA). The PVDF was then incubated with chemiluminescent substrates (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) and visualized by autoradiography.

    siRNA (RNAi)

    Approximately 1 million N417 cells were incubated in a six-well plate with RPMI supplemented with 10% FBS. Five siRNA oligonucleotides specific for the p73 gene or a non-specific pooled duplex control (Dharmacon, Inc., Lafayette, CO) were diluted in serum-free media and added to the appropriate concentration of TKO transfection reagent (Mirus Corp., Madison, WI). Untransfected cells were treated with transfection reagent but not siRNA. Transfected cells were incubated continuously with siRNA complexes at a final concentration of 100 nM. RNA was isolated 24 to 48 hours post-transfection and analyzed by StaRT-PCR.

    Bivariate and statistical analysis

    Pearson correlation and paired-sample and independent T-tests were performed using SPSS 11.5.1 for Windows (SPSS, Chicago, IL) Due to inter-sample variation it was necessary to normalize the data by logarithmic transformation. For each test, a p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Bivariate graphs were created using Microsoft Excel 2000 (Microsoft Corp, Redmond, WA).

    Declarations

    Acknowledgements

    We would like to thank Dr. Vincenzo DeLaurenzi for providing the p73 plasmid DNA. We would also like to thank Drs. Dawn-Alita Hernandez, Yongsook Yoon, Jeffrey Hammersley, Ragheb A. Assaly, and Stacie L. Roshong-Denk for helping us acquire primary samples, Dr. Sakik Khuder for helping with statistical analysis, and Charles Knight, Bradley Austermiller, and D'Anna Mullins for their technical assistance.

    Authors’ Affiliations

    (1)
    Department of Medicine, Medical University of Ohio, 219 Health Education Building, 3055 Arlington Avenue, Toledo, OH 43614-5806, USA
    (2)
    Department of Cariology, Restorative Sciences and Endodontics, University of Michigan, 2310A Dental Research Building, 1011 North University Avenue, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1078, USA

    References

    1. Zetterberg A, Larsson O, Wiman KG: What is the restriction point?. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1995, 7 (6): 835-842.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    2. Kato J, Matsushime H, Hiebert SW, Ewen ME, Sherr CJ: Direct binding of cyclin D to the retinoblastoma gene product (pRb) and pRb phosphorylation by the cyclin D-dependent kinase CDK4. Genes Dev. 1993, 7 (3): 331-342.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    3. Ewen ME, Sluss HK, Sherr CJ, Matsushime H, Kato J, Livingston DM: Functional interactions of the retinoblastoma protein with mammalian D-type cyclins. Cell. 1993, 73 (3): 487-497.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    4. Weinberg RA: The retinoblastoma protein and cell cycle control. Cell. 1995, 81 (3): 323-330.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    5. Chellappan SP, Hiebert S, Mudryj M, Horowitz JM, Nevins JR: The E2F transcription factor is a cellular target for the RB protein. Cell. 1991, 65 (6): 1053-1061.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    6. Lees JA, Saito M, Vidal M, Valentine M, Look T, Harlow E, Dyson N, Helin K: The retinoblastoma protein binds to a family of E2F transcription factors. Mol Cell Biol. 1993, 13 (12): 7813-7825.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
    7. Kovesdi I, Reichel R, Nevins JR: Identification of a cellular transcription factor involved in E1A trans-activation. Cell. 1986, 45 (2): 219-228.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    8. Stevaux O, Dyson NJ: A revised picture of the E2F transcriptional network and RB function. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2002, 14 (6): 684-691.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    9. DeGregori J, Kowalik T, Nevins JR: Cellular targets for activation by the E2F1 transcription factor include DNA synthesis- and G1/S-regulatory genes. Mol Cell Biol. 1995, 15 (8): 4215-4224.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
    10. Stewart MJ, Litz-Jackson S, Burgess GS, Williamson EA, Leibowitz DS, Boswell HS: Role for E2F1 in p210 BCR-ABL downstream regulation of c-myc transcription initiation. Studies in murine myeloid cells. Leukemia. 1995, 9 (9): 1499-1507.PubMedGoogle Scholar
    11. Hermeking H, Rago C, Schuhmacher M, Li Q, Barrett JF, Obaya AJ, O'Connell BC, Mateyak MK, Tam W, Kohlhuber F: Identification of CDK4 as a target of c-MYC. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000, 97 (5): 2229-2234.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    12. Jansen-Durr P, Meichle A, Steiner P, Pagano M, Finke K, Botz J, Wessbecher J, Draetta G, Eilers M: Differential modulation of cyclin gene expression by MYC. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1993, 90 (8): 3685-3689.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    13. Pardee AB: G1 events and regulation of cell proliferation. Science. 1989, 246 (4930): 603-608.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    14. Harper JW, Adami GR, Wei N, Keyomarsi K, Elledge SJ: The p21 Cdk-interacting protein Cip1 is a potent inhibitor of G1 cyclin-dependent kinases. Cell. 1993, 75 (4): 805-816.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    15. Zhu J, Jiang J, Zhou W, Chen X: The potential tumor suppressor p73 differentially regulates cellular p53 target genes. Cancer Res. 1998, 58 (22): 5061-5065.PubMedGoogle Scholar
    16. Xiong Y, Hannon GJ, Zhang H, Casso D, Kobayashi R, Beach D: p21 is a universal inhibitor of cyclin kinases. Nature. 1993, 366 (6456): 701-704.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    17. Yoshikawa H, Nagashima M, Khan MA, McMenamin MG, Hagiwara K, Harris CC: Mutational analysis of p73 and p53 in human cancer cell lines. Oncogene. 1999, 18 (22): 3415-3421.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    18. Yang A, Kaghad M, Caput D, McKeon F: On the shoulders of giants: p63, p73 and the rise of p53. Trends Genet. 2002, 18 (2): 90-95.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    19. Yang A, Walker N, Bronson R, Kaghad M, Oosterwegel M, Bonnin J, Vagner C, Bonnet H, Dikkes P, Sharpe A: p73-deficient mice have neurological, pheromonal and inflammatory defects but lack spontaneous tumours. Nature. 2000, 404 (6773): 99-103.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    20. Jost CA, Marin MC, Kaelin WG: p73 is a simian [correction of human] p53-related protein that can induce apoptosis. Nature. 1997, 389 (6647): 191-194.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    21. Zindy F, Eischen CM, Randle DH, Kamijo T, Cleveland JL, Sherr CJ, Roussel MF: Myc signaling via the ARF tumor suppressor regulates p53-dependent apoptosis and immortalization. Genes Dev. 1998, 12 (15): 2424-2433.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    22. Bates S, Phillips AC, Clark PA, Stott F, Peters G, Ludwig RL, Vousden KH: p14ARF links the tumour suppressors RB and p53. Nature. 1998, 395 (6698): 124-125.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    23. el-Deiry WS, Tokino T, Velculescu VE, Levy DB, Parsons R, Trent JM, Lin D, Mercer WE, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B: WAF1, a potential mediator of p53 tumor suppression. Cell. 1993, 75 (4): 817-825.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    24. Waldman T, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B: p21 is necessary for the p53-mediated G1 arrest in human cancer cells. Cancer Res. 1995, 55 (22): 5187-5190.PubMedGoogle Scholar
    25. Nicholson SA, Okby NT, Khan MA, Welsh JA, McMenamin MG, Travis WD, Jett JR, Tazelaar HD, Trastek V, Pairolero PC: Alterations of p14ARF, p53, and p73 genes involved in the E2F-1-mediated apoptotic pathways in non-small cell lung carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2001, 61 (14): 5636-5643.PubMedGoogle Scholar
    26. Stiewe T, Putzer BM: Role of the p53-homologue p73 in E2F1-induced apoptosis. Nat Genet. 2000, 26 (4): 464-469.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    27. Rodicker F, Stiewe T, Zimmermann S, Putzer BM: Therapeutic efficacy of E2F1 in pancreatic cancer correlates with TP73 induction. Cancer Res. 2001, 61 (19): 7052-7055.PubMedGoogle Scholar
    28. Hiyama H, Iavarone A, Reeves SA: Regulation of the cdk inhibitor p21 gene during cell cycle progression is under the control of the transcription factor E2F. Oncogene. 1998, 16 (12): 1513-1523.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    29. DeMuth JP, Jackson CM, Weaver DA, Crawford EL, Durzinsky DS, Durham SJ, Zaher A, Phillips ER, Khuder SA, Willey JC: The gene expression index c-myc × E2F-l/p21 is highly predictive of malignant phenotype in human bronchial epithelial cells. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 1998, 19 (1): 18-24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    30. Willey JC, Crawford EL, Jackson CM, Weaver DA, Hoban JC, Khuder SA, DeMuth JP: Expression measurement of many genes simultaneously by quantitative RT-PCR using standardized mixtures of competitive templates. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 1998, 19 (1): 6-17.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    31. Vassilev LT, Vu BT, Graves B, Carvajal D, Podlaski F, Filipovic Z, Kong N, Kammlott U, Lukacs C, Klein C: In vivo activation of the p53 pathway by small-molecule antagonists of MDM2. Science. 2004, 303 (5659): 844-848.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    32. Minna JD, Battey JF, Birrer M, Brooks BJ, Cuttitta F, DeGreve J, Gazdar AF, Johnson BE, Nau MM, Sausville EA: Chromosomal deletion, gene amplification, alternative processing, and autocrine growth factor production in the pathogenesis of human lung cancer. Princess Takamatsu Symp. 1986, 17: 109-122.PubMedGoogle Scholar
    33. Wistuba II, Gazdar AF, Minna JD: Molecular genetics of small cell lung carcinoma. Semin Oncol. 2001, 28 (2 Suppl 4): 3-13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    34. Olivier M, Eeles R, Hollstein M, Khan MA, Harris CC, Hainaut P: The IARC TP53 database: new online mutation analysis and recommendations to users. Hum Mutat. 2002, 19 (6): 607-614.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    35. Huqun , Endo Y, Xin H, Takahashi M, Nukiwa T, Hagiwara K: A naturally occurring p73 mutation in a p73-p53 double-mutant lung cancer cell line encodes p73 alpha protein with a dominant-negative function. Cancer Sci. 2003, 94 (8): 718-724.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    36. Scacheri PC, Rozenblatt-Rosen O, Caplen NJ, Wolfsberg TG, Umayam L, Lee JC, Hughes CM, Shanmugam KS, Bhattacharjee A, Meyerson M: Short interfering RNAs can induce unexpected and divergent changes in the levels of untargeted proteins in mammalian cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004, 101 (7): 1892-1897.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    37. Willey JC, Moser CE, Lechner JF, Harris CC: Differential effects of 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate on cultured normal and neoplastic human bronchial epithelial cells. Cancer Res. 1984, 44 (11): 5124-5126.PubMedGoogle Scholar
    38. Lechner JF, Haugen A, McClendon IA, Shamsuddin AM: Induction of squamous differentiation of normal human bronchial epithelial cells by small amounts of serum. Differentiation. 1984, 25 (3): 229-237.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    39. Warner KA, Crawford EL, Zaher A, Coombs RJ, Elsamaloty H, Roshong-Denk SL, Sharief I, Amurao GV, Yoon Y, Al-Astal AY: The c-myc × E2F-l/p21 interactive gene expression index augments cytomorphologic diagnosis of lung cancer in fine-needle aspirate specimens. J Mol Diagn. 2003, 5 (3): 176-183.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    40. Crawford EL, Khuder SA, Durham SJ, Frampton M, Utell M, Thilly WG, Weaver DA, Ferencak WJ, Jennings CA, Hammersley JR: Normal bronchial epithelial cell expression of glutathione transferase P1, glutathione transferase M3, and glutathione peroxidase is low in subjects with bronchogenic carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2000, 60 (6): 1609-1618.PubMedGoogle Scholar
    41. Crawford EL, Peters GJ, Noordhuis P, Rots MG, Vondracek M, Grafstrom RC, Lieuallen K, Lennon G, Zahorchak RJ, Georgeson MJ: Reproducible gene expression measurement among multiple laboratories obtained in a blinded study using standardized RT (StaRT)-PCR. Mol Diagn. 2001, 6 (4): 217-225.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    42. Crawford EL, Warner KA, Weaver DW, Willey JC: Quantitative endpoint RT-PCR expression measurement using the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer and standardized RT-PCR. Agilent Application. 2001, 1-8.Google Scholar
    43. Guidance for Industry. 2005, Pharmacogenomic Data Submissions. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Center for Biologies Evaluation and Research, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, http://www.fda.gov/OHRMS/DOCKETS/98fr/2003d-0497-gdl0002.pdf
    44. Kartasheva NN, Contente A, Lenz-Stoppler C, Roth J, Dobbelstein M: p53 induces the expression of its antagonist p73 Delta N, establishing an autoregulatory feedback loop. Oncogene. 2002, 21 (31): 4715-4727.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    45. Celi FS, Zenilman ME, Shuldiner AR: A rapid and versatile method to synthesize internal standards for competitive PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 1993, 21 (4): 1047-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

    Copyright

    © Harr et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2005

    This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

    Advertisement