Comparison |
Five weeks
|
Eight weeks
|
---|
 | p < 0.11 | p < 0.051 | p < 0.011 | p < 0.11 | p < 0.051 | p < 0.011 |
---|
WT
| Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
LSF vs CO | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 |
HSF vs CO | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
PTEN null
| Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
LSF vs CO | 17 | 3 | 0 | 26 | 12 | 1 |
HSF vs CO | 2862 | 803 | 11 | 189 | 72 | 25 |
Interaction
| Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
PTEN null CO vs WT CO | 385 | 1984 | 8 | 1542 | 9895 | 296 |
PTEN null LSF vs WT CO | 660 | 287 | 42 | 2379 | 17185 | 822 |
PTEN null HSF vs WT CO | 15 | 0 | 0 | 3380 | 23905 | 1204 |
- 1 Benjamini and Hochberg adjusted P-values between the two groups.
- 2 Further details of these transcripts are provided in Figure 8 and Table 2.
- 3Human orthologues of these transcripts were identified and compared to results from a human dietary intervention study performed previously (Figure 9).
- 4Details of these transcripts and their expression are provided in Figure 10A and Additional file 1 - Table S1.
- 5Functional analyses of these transcripts are provided in Table 3, and further analyses in Figure 11.