Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary of the sensitivity and specificity for T790 M mutation testing based on various plasma assay platforms

From: Third generation EGFR TKIs: current data and future directions

Plasma Assays

Sensitivity n/N (%)

Specificity n/N (%)

Plasma T790 M positive / histology negative (%)

Reference

EGFR

T790 M after PD on TKI

EGFR

T790 M after PD on TKI

Digital PCR, Microdroplet

BEAMing

49/60 (81.7)

33/45 (73.3)

2/3 (66.7)

9/18 (50)

9/18 (50)

Karlovich 2016 (Roci)

43/51 (84.3)

33/41 (80.5)

65/67 (97.0)

14/24 (58.3)

10/24 (41.7)

Thress 2015 (AURA)

112/136 (82.3)

111/158 (70.3)

78/80 (97.5)

40/58 (69.0)

18/40 (31.0)

Oxnard 2016

ddPCR

NA

6/9 (66.7)

NA

5/7 (71.4)

2/7 (28.6)

Wang 2017

25/33 (75.7)

20/31 (64.5)

7/8 (87.5)

7/10 (70)

3/10 (30)

Takahama 2016 (West Japan Oncology Group)

9/10 (90)

12/17 (70.5)

28/28 (100)

5/6 (83.3)

1/6 (16.7)

Thress 2015 (AURA)

Allele -specific PCR

ARMS, Therascreen

30/37 (81.1)

5/17 (29.4)

38/38 (100)

6/6 (100)

0

Thress 2015 (AURA)

Roche cobas® AS-PCR

43/51 (84.3)

30/41 (73.2)

65/67 (97.0)

16/24 (66.7)

8/24 (33.3)

Thress 2015 (AURA)

55/75 (73.3)

21/33 (63.6)

24/24 (100)

61/62 (98.4)

1/62 (1.6)

Karlovich et al. 2016 (Roci)

NA

254/414 (61.3)

NA

99/126 (78.6)

27/126 (21.4)

Jenkins 2017 (AURA ext. + AURA2 pooled), excluded those with unknown plasma results

13/16 (81.2)

6/10 (60.0)

30/30 (100)

9/15 (60)

6/15 (40)

Sundaresan 2016

CTCs

NA

5/9 (55.5)

NA

7/12 (58.2)

5/12 (41.7)

Sundaresan 2016