Skip to main content

Table 1 Patient demographics and clinicopathological characteristics of the training and validation cohorts

From: A signature of saliva-derived exosomal small RNAs as predicting biomarker for esophageal carcinoma: a multicenter prospective study

 

CHSUMC cohort

P value

ATH cohort

P value

P value

Variables

Healthy

Patient

Healthy

Patient

(n = 120)

(n = 200)

(n = 60)

(n = 140)

 

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

Age (years)

60.69 ± 8.66

61.06 ± 9.05

0.720B

61.13 ± 9.20

61.24 ± 8.65

0.936B

0.852B

Gender

 Female

50 (41.7)

74 (37.0)

0.410A

25 (41.7)

47 (33.6)

0.335A

0.566A

 Male

70 (58.3)

126 (63.0)

 

35 (58.3)

93 (66.4)

  

Tumor depthC

 T1/T2

NA

58 (29.0)

 

NA

52 (37.1)

 

0.126A

 T3/T4

NA

142 (71.0)

 

NA

88 (62.9)

  

Lymph node metastasis

 Negative

NA

85 (42.5)

 

NA

70 (50.0)

 

0.185A

 Positive

NA

115 (57.5)

 

NA

70 (50.0)

  

Histological differentiation

 Poor

NA

41 (20.5)

 

NA

18 (12.9)

 

0.179A

 Moderate

NA

99 (49.5)

 

NA

78 (55.7)

  

 Well

NA

60 (30.0)

 

NA

44 (31.4)

  

Largest tumor dimension (cm)

NA

4.86 ± 1.45

 

NA

5.01 ± 1.44

 

0.319B

TNM Stage

 I/II

NA

78 (39.0)

 

NA

66 (47.1)

 

0.148A

 III/IV

NA

122 (61.0)

 

NA

74 (52.9)

  
  1. For categorical variables, the number of patients was shown as n (%); quantitive variables were mean ± SD
  2. Aχ2 test was used for comparing control and patient group
  3. BUnpaired t test was used for comparing control and patient group
  4. CTumor depth indicated that how deeply tumor cells have invaded