Silencing of Apoptosis-Inducing factor and poly (ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase reveals novel roles in breast cancer cell death after chemotherapy
© Feng et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 23 April 2012
Accepted: 18 July 2012
Published: 29 July 2012
Cell death induced by poly(ADP-ribose) (PAR) and mediated by apoptosis-inducing factor (AIF) is well-characterized in models of ischemic tissue injury, but their roles in cancer cell death after chemotherapy are less understood.
Here we investigated the roles of PAR and AIF by RNA interference (RNAi) in MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 breast adenocarcinoma cells after chemotherapy. Differences in effects were statistically tested by analysis-of-variance and unpaired student’s t-test.
Silencing of AIF by RNAi led to decreased MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 breast cancer cell death after chemotherapy, which demonstrates a critical role for AIF. RNAi silencing of PAR glycohydrolase (PARG), the primary enzyme that catalyzes the hydrolysis of PAR, led to increased PAR levels but decreased cell death. Further investigation into the possible role of PAR in apoptosis revealed decreased caspase-3/7/8/9 activity in PARG-null cells. Interestingly, the pharmacologic inhibition of caspase activity in PARG-silenced breast cancer cells led to increased cell death after chemotherapy, which indicates that an alternative cell death pathway is activated due to elevated PAR levels and caspase inhibition. AIF silencing in these cells led to profound protection from chemotherapy, which demonstrates that the increased cell death after PARG silencing and caspase inhibition was mediated by AIF.
The results show a role for AIF in breast cancer cell death after chemotherapy, the ability of PAR to regulate caspase activity, and the ability of AIF to substitute as a primary mediator of breast cancer cell death in the absence of caspases. Thus, the induction of cell death by PAR/AIF may represent a novel strategy to optimize the eradication of breast tumors by activating an alternative cell death pathway.
KeywordsPoly(ADP-ribose) Apoptosis-inducing factor Caspase-independent cell death PARG Breast cancer RNA interference
- H2O2 :
manganese superoxide dismutase
nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (reduced form)
The ability to induce alternative pathways of cell death in tumors after chemotherapy is potentially an innovative strategy to optimize cancer cell death. Such optimization could lead to the improved eradication of tumors or the successful chemotherapeutic treatment of cancer cells that evade apoptotic cell death. One controversial, yet potentially novel, cell death pathway is poly(ADP-ribose) (PAR)-dependent cell death mediated by apoptosis-inducing factor (AIF). The synthesis of PAR by the PAR polymerases (PARPs)  is essential for the maintenance of genomic integrity after cell stress. In the absence of stress, AIF has a physiologic role in the mitochondria, as it contains NADH oxidase activity  and it is involved in oxidative phosphorylation . However, therapeutic doses of DNA-damaging chemotherapeutic agents activate the synthesis of PAR and ultimately leads to the translocation of AIF from the mitochondria to the nucleus . Once AIF translocates to the nucleus, it has a cytotoxic role, where it becomes part of a DNA fragmenting complex that initiates caspase-independent cell death . Thus, AIF is also a pro-cell death mediator for a unique programmed cell death pathway known as “necroptosis” .
Although some of the downstream cellular morphological changes in AIF-mediated cell death are similar to those characteristic of apoptosis, such as chromatin condensation, DNA fragmentation, and phosphatidylserine exposure , a unique feature of this cell death pathway is that it can occur in the absence of caspases . In fact, AIF was the first protein reported to mediate a caspase-independent form of programmed cell death . This observation remains controversial, as initial studies demonstrated AIF-mediated cell death to be caspase-independent [4, 7], while later studies demonstrated it to be dependent of caspases [9, 10]. To date, cell death studies support the possibility that AIF contributes to caspase-dependent cell death and it induces an alternative form of apoptosis that is caspase-independent .
Another unique feature of AIF-mediated cell death is its dependence on the synthesis of PAR. Studies have shown that AIF fails to translocate to the nucleus in the absence of PAR synthesis [12, 13]. We recently showed that the genetic disruption of PAR glycohydrolase (PARG), the primary enzyme that catalyzes hydrolysis of PAR , leads to increased levels of PAR and cell death mediated by AIF . Further, PAR was shown to bind AIF, which leads to its release from the mitochondria . PAR is primarily synthesized in the nucleus by the PARPs in response to DNA damage, and PAR causes the mitochondrial release of AIF. These observations suggest that nuclear PAR translocates to the mitochondria and directly acts as the signal for AIF release. This PAR-dependent cell death that is mediated by AIF is termed “parthanatos” .
Current studies, however, suggest that PAR-induced cell death mediated by AIF is only important in certain cell types. For example, studies support a critical role for AIF in the death of post-mitotic cells due to pathologic conditions, such as tissue injury that occurs secondary to ischemia , reperfusion injury , and various conditions exacerbated by inflammation [19, 20].The role of AIF in cancer cell death after chemotherapy is less understood. Studies indicate that chemotherapeutic agents induce both caspase-dependent and caspase-independent cell death in cancer cells [21, 22], and that AIF plays a critical role in the cell death of only a few types of tumor cells [23–25]. Thus, it is unknown if AIF can serve as a primary mediator of cell death in breast cancer cells after chemotherapeutic treatments.
Here, we show a significant role for AIF-mediated cell death induced by PAR in the death of invasive breast cancer cells. Further, we demonstrate that AIF can substitute as caspase executioner in these cells in response to chemotherapy and in the absence of caspase activity. In addition, we show that the inability to catalyze the hydrolysis of PAR negatively regulates caspase activity, which provides further insight into the ability of PAR and AIF to cause cell death in cancer cells in the absence of caspases. Thus, cell death initiated by PAR and mediated by AIF is potentially a novel strategy to induce an alternative pathway of cell death in breast tumors.
Silencing of AIF by RNAi leads to decreased nuclear translocation of AIF after DNA damage
Silencing of AIF by RNAi leads to decreased cell death after treatment with DNA-damaging chemotherapeutic agents
Silencing of PARG by RNAi leads to increased and prolonged levels of PAR after treatment with DNA-damaging agents
Silencing of PARG by RNAi leads to decreased levels of cell death and increased levels of procaspase-8 after DNA damage
The silencing of PARG in combination with the inhibition of caspases leads to increased cell death in MDA-MB-231 cells after MNNG treatment that is mediated by AIF
To identify this alternative cell death pathway in the absence of caspase activity, we performed the silencing of AIF by RNAi in PARG-silenced MDA-MB-231 cells pretreated with Q-VD-OPh. The results demonstrate that the silencing of AIF in these cells led to a profound amount of protection from MNNG treatment, since the amount of cell death observed was only 16% (Figure 5A). This was significantly decreased as compared to the level of cell death in PARG-silenced cells pretreated with Q-VD-OPh (50%). This indicates that AIF is a primary mediator of cell death that occurs after the inhibition of caspase activity in PARG-silenced cells. Further, the decrease in cell death due to AIF silencing (66%) was greater than the decrease in cell death observed in PARG-silenced cells (43%) or control cells (cells transfected with scrambled RNAi oligos) pretreated with Q-VD-OPh (49%). This indicates that AIF is responsible for mediating the majority of cell death that is observed after chemotherapy in PARG-silenced MDA-MB-231 cells in the absence of caspases.
A closer inspection of cell death in MDA-MB-231 cells after knockdown or inhibition of caspases, PARG, and AIF was performed by analyzing the amount of cells that exhibited propidium iodide (PI) and/or annexin V-FITC fluorescence after FACS analysis. The results revealed that the inhibition of caspases in control cells (via pretreatment with Q-VD-OPh) and the silencing of PARG by siRNA led to a decreased amount of cells that exhibited dual PI/annexin V fluorescence (Figure 5B). This indicates decreased levels of caspase-mediated apoptotic cell death. However, the combination of PARG-silencing and Q-VD-OPh treatment led to increased PI/annexin V staining, which would normally indicate increased levels of apoptosis. However, caspase inhibition via Q-VD-OPh pretreatment was confirmed by immunoblot, as procaspase-3 levels were decreased after MNNG treatment (due to caspase-3 activation), but were not decreased after the pretreatment of PARG-silenced cells with Q-VD-OPh (Figure 5C). This demonstrates that caspase-mediated apoptosis was not the primary type of cell death induced in PARG-silenced cells pretreated with Q-VD-OPh. The addition of AIF-silencing in these cells led to decreased levels of PI/annexin V staining (Figure 5B). The silencing of PARG and AIF protein levels by RNAi were confirmed by immunoblot (Figure 5C). Since AIF-mediated necroptosis also leads to the dual staining of cells with PI/annexin V , these results thus demonstrate that AIF is the primary mediator of cell death in PARG-silenced cells pretreated with Q-VD-OPh. Taken together, these results demonstrate that AIF can substitute as the primary mediator of cell death in PARG-silenced MDA-MB-231 cells in the absence of caspases, and it potentially identifies a critical role for AIF in the death of breast adenocarcinoma cells after chemotherapy.
Our results identify a potentially novel role for AIF in the death of breast cancer cells after chemotherapy. Here, we demonstrated a role for AIF in the death of breast adenocarcinoma cells after treatment with cisplatin, cyclophosphamide, or epirubicin, all currently utilized chemotherapeutic agents used to treat breast cancer [28, 29]. The potential importance of AIF in breast cancer cell death is also seen in its ability to mediate cell death in the absence of caspase activity. Previously, it was shown that AIF can substitute as caspase executioner in ischemicneuronal injury mediated by N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor stimulation after the inhibition of caspase activity . Likewise, the results here demonstrate the ability of AIF to substitute as caspase executioner in breast cancer cell death after increasing PAR levels and pretreatment with the pan-caspase inhibitor, Q-VD-OPh. The ability of AIF to mediate caspase dependent or caspase independent cell death is controversial. Initial studies demonstrated that the ability of AIF to induce cell death was caspase-independent [7, 18], while subsequent studies demonstrated it was caspase-dependent [9, 10]. This study provides further evidence for the ability of AIF to induce cell death in the absence of caspase activity. Thus, this paper presents evidence that AIF is an important mediator of breast cancer cell death after chemotherapy in the absence of caspases, and it also identifies a role for AIF in the mediation of caspase-independent cell death in breast adenocarcinoma cells.
These results reveal the potential ability for the pharmacologic activation of AIF to improve the chemotherapeutic treatment of breast cancer. Because of the dependence of nuclear AIF translocation on the synthesis of PAR, a feasible strategy to induce AIF-mediated cell death would appear to be elevating PAR levels by inhibiting PARG, the primary enzyme that catalyzes the hydrolysis of PAR, to improve the chemotherapeutic response. The modulation of PAR levels was shown to primarily affect rapidly dividing cells , which demonstrates the ability of the targeting of PAR to selectively target cancer cells. Our previous studies suggest that enhancing the synthesis of PAR may provide an improved strategy to successfully treat breast tumors due to the ability of PAR to activate AIF-mediated cell death. However, our data here shows that the silencing of PARG by RNAi leads to increased breast cancer cell survival. This is in agreement with a previous study that demonstrated that the silencing of PARG by RNAi in murine embryonic fibroblasts decreased cell death following hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) treatment . However, most studies regarding the genetic disruption or knockdown of PARG demonstrate increased cell death. Stable knockdown of PARG by short hairpin RNA (shRNA) caused increased cell death following apoptotic doses of H2O2 and radiosensitivity to X-rays . Genetic disruption of the Parg gene causes embryonic lethality and increased cell death in response to low doses of DNA-damaging agents [37, 38]. Recently, we demonstrated the specific induction of AIF-mediated cell death in PARG-null cells after UV-C radiation . Thus, the knockdown or genetic disruption of PARG is known to have a deleterious effect on cancer cells.
However, we provide evidence that PARG activity has a role in increasing caspase activity, such that the knockdown or absence of PARG leads to decreased levels of caspase activity and decreased levels of apoptotic cell death. This suggests that PARG may have multiple roles in the regulation of caspase-dependent and caspase-independent cell death. The difference in cell death versus cell survival after the silencing or absence of PARG may reflect differential roles for PARG isoforms on the modulation of cell death. The Parg gene is unique, but alternative splicing leads to five different PARG isoforms that localize to different cellular compartments . Although the function of each is poorly understood, studies have identified a role for the nuclear isoform in DNA repair and the maintenance of genomic integrity , and a role for the cytoplasmic PARG isoforms to regulate the translation and stability of mRNAs after cell stress. It is therefore possible that each PARG isoform may have a role in different pathways of cell death. Thus, while the nuclear PARG isoform may have a role in genomic stability and the regulation of caspase-independent cell death, the cytoplasmic isoforms may have roles in regulating caspase function in the cytosol in response to cell stress. Therefore, the specific inhibition of the nuclear PARG isoform may be required to optimize cell death in breast cancer cells in response to chemotherapeutic treatments.
This study utilized MNNG, which is an experimental chemotherapeutic agent only. However, it is a DNA-methylating agent that also induces free radical-mediated oxidative stress, which is similar to the mechanism of other DNA-alkylating chemotherapeutic agents. It is also a well-established inducer of PAR metabolism and AIF-mediated cell death[12, 33]. Although MNNG is not clinically utilized, it is an appropriate agent to utilize in order to study the molecular pathways of cell death in breast cancer cells mediated by PAR. Further, the similar mechanism of action that MNNG shares with other currently utilized DNA-alkylating chemotherapeutic agents indicates that MNNG is suitable for initial studies regarding the chemotherapeutic relevance of PAR/AIF in breast cancer cells. However, future preclinical studies expanding on our findings will be required to utilize currently used clinical agents.
Finally, the results provide novel insight into the ability of PAR to potentially regulate apoptosis. PAR was initially associated with caspases due to the specific cleavage of PARP-1 into 24 and 89 kDa forms by caspase 3 during apoptosis . However, cells lacking PARP-1 were shown to undergo caspase-dependent apoptosis normally following stimuli that activate intrinsic or extrinsic apoptotic pathways . Thus, a direct role for PAR in caspase-dependent cell death was not known. Here, we demonstrate the ability of PAR to negatively regulate caspase activity. Because PAR was shown to induce the translocation of AIF to the nucleus following genotoxic stress , it is possible that the absence of PARG, which leads to elevated levels of PAR, leads to the modulation of caspase activity and activates the nuclear translocation of AIF. Such a scenario, which requires further investigation, would provide novel insight into the mechanism of how cell death induced by PAR and mediated by AIF is caspase-independent.
This study demonstrates a role for the pro-cell death mediator, AIF, in breast cancer cell death after chemotherapy. Further, the results demonstrate the novel ability of the hydrolysis of PAR by PARG to regulate caspase activity. We therefore report novel roles for AIF and PAR in the death of breast adenocarcinoma cells after chemotherapy. Moreover, we report the ability of AIF to substitute as primary mediator of breast cancer cell death in the absence of caspases after chemotherapy. Thus, these results identify the relevance of AIF in breast cancer cell death and they suggest that cell death by PAR/AIF may represent a strategy to optimize the eradication of breast tumors by activating an alternative cell death pathway.
Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) was purchased from Hyclone (Logan, UT). OptiMEM reduced serum medium was purchased from Gibco (Grand Island, NT). Fetal bovine serum (FBS) was purchased from Atlas Biologicals (Fort Collins, CO). Protease inhibitor cocktail tablets (Complete Mini, EDTA-free) were from Roche (Mannheim, Germany). Caspase inhibitor, Q-VD-OPh, was purchased from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN). Lipofectamine2000 reagent, trypsin, penicillin-streptomycin solution, and glutamine were purchased from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA). N-Methyl-N’-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG) was purchased from AccuStandard (New Haven, CT). Epirubicin, cisplatin and cyclophosphamide were all purchased from Calbiochem (La Jolla, CA). ApoScreen annexin V-fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) conjugate and propidium iodide (PI) were purchased from Southern Biotech (Birmingham, AL). Primary antibodies utilized were polyclonal anti-PAR clone 96–10 (Trevigen, Gaithersburg, MD), polyclonal anti-β-actin (Thermo Fisher Scientific), polyclonal anti-caspase-3 (Millipore, Billerica, MA), monoclonal anti-PARG (Millipore), polyclonal anti-AIF (Rockland Immunochemicals, Gilbertsville, PA), polyclonal anti-manganese superoxide dismutase (MnSOD) (Millipore), monoclonal anti-Lamin B2 clone LN43 (Thermo Fisher), and monoclonal anti-caspase-8 (Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA). Secondary antibodies horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated goat anti-rabbit and anti-mouse were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO).
Human breast adenocarcinoma cells (MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7) were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS, 2 mM L-glutamine and 100U/ml penicillin/streptomycin at 37°C in 5% CO2. Wild type and PARG-null primary embryonic trophoblast stem (TS) cells were derived from E3.5 mouse blastocysts and cultured as previously described . For siRNA transfections, each cell line was cultured at least one day in antibiotic-free medium before transfection.
The silencing of AIF by RNAi was performed as previously reported using sense (5’-CUUGUUCCAGCGAUGGCAUtt-3’) and antisense (5’-AUGCCAUCGCUGGAACAAGtt-3’) RNA oligos that target nucleotides 151–171 in human AIF . The silencing of PARG by RNAi was performed as previously reported using RNA oligos 5’-AAATGGGACTTTACAGCTTTG-3’) that target nucleotides 1960–1980 in human PARG . Control oligos 5’-AGACAGAAGACAGAUAGGCtt-3’ (sense) and 5’-GCCUAUCUGUCUUCUGUCUtt-3’ (antisense) were used for all negative controls . All RNA oligos were purchased as duplexed RNA from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). Each siRNA duplex was resuspended in RNAase-free H2O at a final concentration of 20 μM and stored at −20°C.
For RNAi transfections, cells were plated in 0.5 ml medium per well without antibiotics in 24-well plates one day before transfection. At the time of transfection, cells were approximately 50% confluent. For each transfection, duplex siRNA was added to 50 μl OptiMEM medium and 1 μl lipofectamine2000 was added to 50 μl OptiMEM. After 5 min, the two solutions were gently mixed and then incubated at room temperature for 20 min. Final concentrations of siRNA were 20 nM for AIF and 40 nM for PARG. The mixtures were added to each well and cells were cultured for an additional 48–72 h.
Whole cell lysate extraction
Cells were harvested by trypsinization, washed with PBS, suspended in lysis buffer containing 10 mM Tris–HCl (pH8), 0.1 M NaCl, 1 mM EGTA, 1 mM EDTA, 0.1% triton X-100, and protease inhibitors (Complete Protease Inhibitor Cocktail tablets, Roche). Extracts were then incubated on ice for 30 min with vortexing every 10 min. Cleared cell lysates were obtained after centrifugation at 16,000 xg for 10 min. SDS-PAGE sample buffer was added to supernatants to achieve final concentrations of 50 mM Tris–HCl with pH 6.8, 1% SDS, 2.5% glycerol, 0.002% bromophenol blue, and 143 mM 2-mercaptoethanol. Samples were then boiled for 2 min at 100°C.
Cells were harvested by trypsinization and washed with PBS. Pellets were fractionated using the NE-PER Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Extraction Kit (Pierce, Rockfield, IL) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions were prepared in SDS sample buffer and boiled as previously described.
Approximately 20 μg of each lysate or subcellular sample was subjected to 8-12% sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). The proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose by semi-dry transfer at 25 V for 1 h using a Trans-blot SD apparatus (BioRad, Hercules, CA). Membranes were blocked with PBS containing 5% milk and 0.1% Tween-20 (PBST) at room temperature for 1 h and incubated with primary antibodies (1:2000 anti-AIF, 1:2000 anti-PARG, 1:3000 anti-MnSOD, 1:1000 anti-LaminB2, 1:10,000 anti-PAR, 1:10000 anti-beta-actin, 1:2000 anti-caspase3 or 1:2000 anti-caspase-8) in PBST + 5% milk overnight (shaking) at 4°C. Membranes were then washed with PBST three times and incubated with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated goat anti-rabbit or anti-mouse antibody (1:10000) for 1 h. The membranes were washed as described above, and chemiluminescence was initiated using the Supersignal West Pico reagents (Pierce). Immunoblots were then developed on a ChemiDoc XRS gel imaging system (Bio-Rad). For quantification of protein levels for each blot, immunoblots were examined by densitometry with the ChemiDoc imager using Quantity One software. Relative densitometry ratios were then calculated using β-actin as loading controls. The resulting AIF/actin, PARG/actin, or procaspase-8/actin values were then used to quantify relative protein levels.
Cell Viability Assay
Forty-eight hours after cells were transfected with siRNA, cells were treated with 0.5 mM MNNG, an experimental chemotherapeutic agent that methylates DNA  and is known to induce PAR-mediated cell death [12, 33, 46]. Cells were also treated with 20 μM epirubicin (EPI), a dose similar to those used in MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells in previous reports [47, 48] and consistent with the reported IC50 of this agent in breast cancer cells (55.3 μM) . Other treatments consisted of 10 mM cyclophosphamide (CPA), a dose previously utilized in MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells , or 0.5 mM cisplatin (DDP), an elevated dose for this agent, but the exposure time utilized (6 hr) was 4 to 12-fold less than normally indicated (24–72 hr). Further, this dose of DDP was consistent with the reported IC50 of this agent in breast cancer cells (0.6 mM) . Twenty hours after treatment, cells were harvested, washed with PBS, and resuspended in annexin-binding buffer (10 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 140 mM NaCl, 2.5 mM CaCl2,) to approximately 1 X 106 cells/ml. For each 100 μl of cell suspension, 2.5 μl of ApoScreen annexin V-FITC conjugate solution (Southern Biotech) and 1 μl of 100 μg/ml propidium iodide (PI) solution was added. Cells were then incubated at room temperature for 15 min and 400 μl annexin-binding buffer was added. Cell death was then measured by quantifying the percentage of cells that exhibited annexin V-FITC and/or PI fluorescence using a flow cytometer (Accuri, Ann Arbor, MI). Total cell death was quantified by adding the percentage of cells detected in the upper left (PI), upper right (PI + annexin V-FITC), and lower right (annexin V-FITC) quadrants in the FACS dot plots. For pretreatment with Q-VD-OPh, cells were treated with 40 μM Q-VD-OPh 30 min prior to chemotherapeutic treatments. Treatment with Q-VD-OPh continued during all treatments, and until FACS analyses were performed.
Caspase Activity Assay
Wild type and PARG null TS cells were cultured and exposed to 25 J/m2 UV-C using a low-pressure Hg lamp (model G30T8, Sylvania, Danvers, MA). 12 h after UV exposure, 1 X 105 cells were seeded in 96-well opaque black plate and subjected to Apo-ONE Homogeneous Caspase-3/7, Caspase-8, and Caspase-9 Assays (Promega) according the manufacturer’s specifications. Fluorescence was analyzed using a Bio-Tek (Winooski, VT) Synergy HT plate reader at an excitation wavelength of 485 nm and at an emission wavelength of 527 nm. Negative controls were provided by untreated cells and cells pretreated with 40 μM Q-VD-OPh.
All error bars for calculated cell death, caspase activity, and protein levels represented the standard error of the mean (SEM). Statistical analyses were accomplished by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and unpaired Student’s t-test.
We would like to give our thanks to the laboratory of Dr. Beth A. Vorderstrasse at Washington State University for the use of their UV transilluminator and the laboratory of Dr. Michael J. Smerdon at Washington State University for their general assistance in the UV studies. We also thank Dr. Gary G. Meadows at Washington State University for his critical readings of this manuscript. This work was supported by the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) Foundation and NIH/NIAAA grant #K05AA017149 (to GGM). MMH was supported by a NIH Protein Biotechnology Training Grant (T32GM08336) to WSU.
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.