Is cumulative frequency of mitochondrial DNA variants a biomarker for colorectal tumor progression?

  • Felix O Aikhionbare1Email author,

    Affiliated with

    • Masood Khan2,

      Affiliated with

      • Delicia Carey3,

        Affiliated with

        • Joel Okoli4 and

          Affiliated with

          • Rodney Go2

            Affiliated with

            Molecular Cancer20043:30

            DOI: 10.1186/1476-4598-3-30

            Received: 16 August 2004

            Accepted: 13 October 2004

            Published: 13 October 2004


            To examine the relationship between mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) alterations and colorectal tumorigenesis, we used high-resolution restriction endonucleases and sequencing to assess the mitochondrial genome from three histologic subtypes of colorectal adenomas (tubular = 8; tubulovillous = 9; and villous = 8), colorectal cancer (CRC) tissues = 27, and their matched surrounding normal tissue (MSNT) = 52. The mitochondrial genomes were amplified using 9 pairs of overlapping primers and systematically analyzed by means of high-resolution analysis. DNA fragments showing a shift in banding patterns between the three adenomas, CRC, in comparison to the MSNT were sequenced to identify the mtDNA alterations. A total of thirty-eight germ-line mtDNA variants were observed in this study. Twenty-two of the thirty-eight were identified as mutations and 59% (13 of 22) were silent mutations and one was a 1-bp insertion. Sixteen of thirty-eight were distinct SNPs in flanking regions of the restriction sites and, 6 of the 16 (37%) SNPs were not previously reported. Most of these mutations/SNPs were homoplasmic and distributed in various regions of mitochondrial genes including the 16S and 12S rRNA. Based on our results, mtDNA germline variants increased in prevalence with adenoma CRC progression. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report to show an increased prevalence of mitochondrial gene variants in CRC tumorigenesis.



            mitochondrial DNA


            adenosine triphosphate


            colorectal cancer


            matched surrounding Normal tissue


            single nucleotide polymorphisms


            polymerase chain reaction.


            Colorectal polyps are a frequent occurrence in the general population and adenomatous changes in these polyps are associated with the overwhelming majority of CRC. These adenomas are the precursor lesions of colon cancer [1]. Currently, clinical management of individuals with colorectal polyps is guided by the histology of the lesion [2]. However, the accuracy of an appropriate staging of colorectal polyps progression to cancer continues to confound clinical pathologists as well as surgeons. Alternative strategies, which augment pathological findings such as the identification of molecular markers that are associated with the colorectal tumor progression, may prove to be a useful as a prognostic tool and a preoperative stage-specific evaluation. Recently, there have been reports of the potential use of mtDNA mutations as a biomarker in the solid tumor of other cancers [36] due its repaired less efficiently compared with that of nuclear DNA. Also, Mitochondria have been implicated in cancer given their role in apoptosis [7, 8] and its vulnerability to mutation due to the close proximity to a major source of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Nevertheless, definitive mtDNA mutations associated with the progression of tumors such as CRC have yet to be established. Given the connection between mitochondria, ROS, and neoplasia, mtDNA from CRC adenoma, cancer tissues, and pathologically determined matched surrounding non-cancerous tissue were screened for variants, which may be used as biomarkers for colorectal cancer progression. We speculated that there is an association between one or more mtDNA mutations in the adenomatous polyps and CRC progression and the cumulative frequencies of such mtDNA mutations may eventually be demonstrated to be an important marker in adenoma colorectal progression.

            This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Morehouse School of Medicine and the Research Oversite Committee of the Grady Memorial Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia and the University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama. Primary fresh frozen and paraffin embedded tissues from 3 histologic subtypes of adenomatous polyps (8 tubular; 9 tubulovillous; and 8 villous), 27 CRC tissues, and histologically MSNT, n = 52 were obtained from the Tissue Procurement Network at the University of Alabama at Birmingham and the Department of Surgery of Morehouse School of Medicine/Grady Hospital. Adenomas were defined by histologic type, degree of dysplasia, and presence of infiltrating adenocarcinoma in adenoma and classified as tubular, tubulovillus, and villous. CRC diagnosis was confirmed by histological examinations of biospied specimens for all patients and pathological tumor staging for these was based on American Joint Committee on Cancer [9]. The mean age of the study subjects was 66.3 ± 5.7 years.

            Genomic DNA was extracted from both frozen and paraffin embedded remnant tissues using Tri-Reagent (Molecular, Research Center Inc., Cincinnati, Ohio) and Purgene DNA purification kits (Gentra Systems, Minneapolis, Minnesota) according to the manufacture's protocol. The mtDNA from each tissue sample was amplified by PCR using nine overlapping mtDNA primer pairs as previously described [10, 11], which resulted in large PCR products that exclude the possibility that nuclear pseudogenes were amplified. Each PCR product was digested with 14 restriction endonucleases (AluI, AvaII, BamHI, Dde I, HaeII, HaeIII, HhaI, HincII, HinfI, HpaI, MspI, MboI, RsaI, and TaqI) and then subjected to direct sequencing of both sense and anti-sense strands with ABI 3100 Genetic Analyzer to determine the exact nature of new length polymorphisms/mutations detected by restriction analysis. Sequences were compared (BLAST) to the human mitochondrial DNA sequence (Genbank Accession #J01415). The MITODAT database was used to identify mitochondrial genome sequence variants.

            The analysis of mtDNA samples by restriction digestion and sequencing of the DNA fragments showed non-predicted banding patterns either as homoplasmic single bandshifts or heteroplasmic multiple bands on the gel. The PCR product data point in overlapping regions were counted only once. However overlapping regions were used as internal controls for the identification of the variants. Results of the high-resolution restriction analyses and sequencing of the entire mitochondrial genome yielded 38 sequence variants (including 16 SNPs from the flanking restriction sites) for the precursor adenomatous polyps and cancer tissues. In no instance was a variant detected in the adenomatous tissue found in the histologically matched adjacent surrounding tissue, indicating that these were germ-line origin.

            Based upon our assessment of the mitochondrial DNA from non-cancer, precancerous (adenomatous polyps), and colorectal cancer tissues using a high-resolution restriction analysis, we have identified sequence variants. To our knowledge this is the first assessment of the mitochondrial genome using solely primary tissue rather than cell lines. This is important since tissues in culture can undergo clonal evolution which can distort frequency data. Although, the restriction analyses identified a number of band shifts indicating site gains or losses, these data only indicated that the predicted sequence had changed. They did not identify specific base pair changes. We therefore used the original primers and a series of nested primers to sequence the band shifts in order to identify these specific changes. A total of thirty-eight germ-line mtDNA variants were observed and all mutations/SNPs were considered as germ-line origin since the variants found in the colorectal adenoma polyps or cancerous tissues were also found in the MSNT tissues. Twenty-two of the thirty-eight were identified as mutations and 59% (13 of 22) were mostly silent mutations of T-to-C. or a G-to-A transition, which is consistent with the mutagenic spectra of oxidative, damage [12, 13]. Among them, C3316T/A (ND1; Met-to Met/Ile), G2758A (16SrRNA), T2352C (16SrRNA), A4769G (ND2; Met-to-Met), A3759G (ND1;CUN), G5178T (ND2; CUN-to-Met) G7028A (COI; Ala-to-Ala) T7055C/G (COI; Gly-to-Gly) C7498T (S(UCN)), G6260A (COI; Glu-to-Gly), G8251A (COII; Gly-to-Gly) T8784C (ATPase 6; Gly-to-Gly) A8618G (ATPase6; Ile-to-Thr), G9055A (ATPase 6, Ala-to-Thr), A8860G (ATPase 6 Thr-to-Ala), T11641C (ND4; Met-to-Met), A10398G (ND3; Thr-to-Ala), C10400T (ND3; Thr-to-Ala), C12633A(ND5;S(UCN)), C16390T(D-loop), T16519C(tRNAVal). However, one was a 9-bp Ins5892C in a non-coding region between MTTY and MTCOI. Some of these mutations are located in ATP synthase genes that are involved in mtDNA genome maintenance and integrity in yeast [14]. Seventy-five percent (39 of 52) of a G8860A (Thr-to-Ala) mutation in ATPase 6 gene was detected among CRC adenomas and cancer tissues, compared to 14% (7 of 52) in MSNT tissues. This mutational spectrum in ATPase gene could lead to a less efficient mtDNA replication and abnormalities as previously suggested by Maximo et al. [15]. Sixteen of thirty-eight were distinct SNPs in flanking regions of the restriction sites and 10 of the 16 (63%) have been reported, and 6 were not recorded in the MITODAT database [#J01415]. The identified SNPs are 3107delG (ND1; Frameshift), T2914G (16SrRNA), A2706G (16SrRNA), A2768G (16SrRNA), T2885C (16SrRNA), C7521T (tRNAAsp), 7335insC (COI; Frameshift), G7256A (COI; Asn-to-Asn), T7146A (COI; Thr-to-S(UCN)), G8206A (COI; Met-to-Met), A16325G (D-loop), T16309G (D-loop), G16294A (D-loop), G16266A (D-loop), G16233A (D-loop), 8269-9bp del (noncoding). Worth mentioning is also the high frequency of 16S rRNA gene variants (> 65%) in the mtDNA among CRC tissue versus the < 25% in the precancerous tissues. Mutations in the 16S rRNA gene were commonly found in different cancers, except those of the thyroid [16].

            We then sought to determine whether or not any of mtDNA variants observed in flanking regions of these restriction site variants may prove to be informative biomarkers. Although, a total of 38 of the mtDNA variants were found, none of the variants appeared to be a marker for a particular adenoma CRC tumor tissue type. Nevertheless, cumulative frequencies of mtDNA variants in the different tissue types resulted in a high prevalence of mtDNA sequence variants in CRC tissue and the trend was for the number of variants to be lowest in the precancerous (Fig. 1), suggesting that this may be a useful approach to distinguishing the progressive stages of CRC adenomas as previously observed in tumour progression in the thyroid [17]. Our sample of CRC adenomas is relatively small and these data must not be overinterpreted at this point. The data however are suggestive and the cumulative frequency approach is currently being followed-up. It is possible that the high frequency of variants in mtDNA in CRC cancer tissues may result from the high rate of mtDNA replication. Furthermore, most of the mtDNA mutations in this study could be a result of mtDNA aggression affected by reactive oxygen species [1821] and could occur via a slipped replication mechanism [22].
            Figure 1

            Frequencies of mitochondrial genome variants based on high-restriction analysis in all of the colorectal tumors (tubular, tubulovillous, villous), cancer tissues in each of the 9 primer sets. Numbers on the abscissa represent PCR products obtained using overlapping primers sets 1–9, termed haploblocks (Rank methods; for all comparsion).

            These data should be interpreted cautiously as they are based on small number of sample size. Similar studies have looked at precancerous tissue types [20], however they have not assessed cumulative frequencies of mutations in these same tissues as we have done. Our study is also different in that we did not use cell lines for this work. Moreover, consistent with our findings were reports of cumulative mitochondrial DNA damage in the aging process as well as in cancer [23]. A similar mechanism may be involved in colorectal cancer progression, since age is a risk factor for CRC.



            The authors would like to thank Drs. Birdsong of Grady Hospital, Atlanta and Grizzle of University of Alabama-Birmingham for providing some initial frozen and paraffin embedded tissues used in this study. We also thank Dr. Bracie Watson Jr. for his initial involvement with project. This work was supported by MSM/UAB partnership NIH-NCI grant #U56-CA92080.

            Authors’ Affiliations

            Department of Medicine, Morehouse School of Medicine
            School of Public Health, University of Alabama
            Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama
            Department of Surgery, Morehouse School of Medicine


            1. Muto T, Bussey HJ, Morson BC: The evolution of cancer of the colon and rectum. Cancer. 1975, 36: 2251-2270.View ArticlePubMed
            2. Costantini M, Sciallero S, Giannini A, Gatteschi B, Rinaldi P, Lanzanova G, Bonelli L, Casetti T, Bertinelli E, Giuliani O, Castiglione G, Mantellini P, Naldoni C, Bruzzi P: SMAC Workgroup. Interobserver agreement in the histologic diagnosis of colorectal polyps. the experience of the multicenter adenoma colorectal study (SMAC). J Clin Epidemiol. 2003, 56: 209-214. 10.1016/S0895-4356(02)00587-5View ArticlePubMed
            3. Sanchez-Cespedes M, Parrella P, Nomoto S, Cohen D, Xiao Y, Estellar M, Jeronimo C, Jordan RC, Nicol T, Koch WM, Schoenberg M, Mazzarelli P, Fazio VM, Sidransky D: Identification of a mononucleotide repeat as a major target for mitochondrial DNA alterations in human tumors. Cancer Res. 2001, 61: 7015-7019.PubMed
            4. Tan D, Bai R, Wong L: Comprehensive Scanning of Somatic Mitochondrial DNA Mutations in Breast Cancer. Cancer Res. 2002, 62: 972-976.PubMed
            5. Wang HY, Shin VY, Leung SY, Yuen ST, Cho CH: Involvement of bcl-2 and caspase-3 in apoptosis induced by cigarette smoke extract in the gastric epithelial cell. Toxicol Pathol. 2003, 31: 220-226. 10.1080/01926230309804View ArticlePubMed
            6. Copeland WC, Wachsman JT, Johnson FM, Penta JS: Mitochandrial DNA alterations in cancer. Cancer Invest. 2002, 4: 557-569. 10.1081/CNV-120002155View Article
            7. Kroemer G, Reed JC: Mitochondrial control of cell death. Nat Med. 2000, 5: 513-519. 10.1038/74994View Article
            8. Augenlicht LH, Heerdt BG: Mitochondria: integrators in tumorigenesis?. Nat Genet. 2001, 28: 104-105. 10.1038/88800View ArticlePubMed
            9. , : International histological classification of disease of tumors, histological typing of intestinal tumors. Geneva: WHO. 1976, 15-23.
            10. Torroni A, Shurr T, Yang C-C, Szathmary E: Native American mitochondrial DNA analysis indicates that the Amerind and the Nadene populations were founded by two Iindependent migrations. Genetics. 1992, 130: 153-162.PubMed CentralPubMed
            11. Watson B Jr, Khan MA, Desmond RA, Bergman S: Mitochondrial DNA in Black Americans with hypertension associated end-Stage renal diseases. Am J Kidney Dis. 2001, 38: 529-536.View ArticlePubMed
            12. Beckman KB, Ames BN: Oxidative decay of DNA. J Biol Chem. 1997, 272: 19633-19636. 10.1074/jbc.272.32.19633View ArticlePubMed
            13. Cadet J, Berger M, Douki T, Ravanat JL: Oxidative damage to DNA: formation, measurement, and biological significance. Rev Physiol Biochem Pharmacol. 1997, 131: 1-87.PubMed
            14. Contamine V, Picard M: Maintenance and integrity of the mitochondrial genome: a plethora of nuclear genes in the budding yeast. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2000, 64: 281-315. 10.1128/MMBR.64.2.281-315.2000PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
            15. Maximo V, Soares P, Lima J, Cameselle-Teijeiro , Sobrinho-Simoes M: Mitochondrial DNA somatic mutations (point mutations and large deletions) and mitochondrial DNA variants in human thyroid pathology a study with emphasis on Hurthle cell tumors. Am J Pathol. 2002, 160: 1857-1865.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
            16. Liu VWS, Shi HH, Cheung ANY, Chiu PM, Leung WT, Nagley P, Wong LC, Ngan YS: High Incidence of Somatic Mitochondrial DNA Mutations in Human Ovarian Carcinomas. Cancer Res. 2001, 61: 5998-6001.PubMed
            17. Yeh JJ, Lunetta KL, van Orsouw NJ, Moore FD, Mutter GL, Vijg J, Dahia PL, Eng C: Somatic mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) mutations in papillary thyroid carcinomas and differential mtDNA sequence variants in cases with thyroid tumours. Oncogene. 2000, 19: 2060-2066. 10.1038/sj.onc.1203537View ArticlePubMed
            18. Backer JM, Weinstein IB: Mitochondrial DNA is a major cellular target for a dihydrodiol-epoxide derivative of benzo [a]pyrene. Science. 1980, 209: 279-299.View Article
            19. Allen JA, Coombs MM: Covalent binding of oplycyclic aromatic compounds to mitochondrial and nuclear DNA. Nature. 1980, 287: 244-245.View ArticlePubMed
            20. Polyak K, Li Y, Zhu H, Lengauer C, Willson JKV, Markowitz SD, Trush MA, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein : Somatic mutations of the mitochondrial genome in human colorectal tumours. Nat Genet. 1998, 20: 291-293. 10.1038/3108View ArticlePubMed
            21. Ames BN, Shigenage MK, Hagen TM: Oxidants, antioxidants, and the degenerative diseases of aging. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993, 90: 7915-7922.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
            22. Shoffner JM, Lott MT, Voljavec AS, Soueidan SA, Costigan DA, Wallace DC: Spontaneous Kearns-Sayre/chronic external ophthalmoplegia plus syndrome associated with a mitochondrial DNA deletion: a slip-replication model and metabolic therapy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989, 86: 7952-7956.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
            23. Kang D, Hamasaki N: Mitochondrial oxidative stress and mitochondrial DNA. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2003, 41: 1281-1288. 10.1515/CCLM.2003.195View ArticlePubMed

            This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.