Skip to main content

Table 2 Liquid biopsy analytes and potential utility as prognostic biomarkers

From: Potential clinical utility of liquid biopsies in ovarian cancer

Analyte

Author, Year

Tumour Subtype and Staging

Number of patients

Laboratory Technique

Prognostic Significance

Ref

CTCs

Zhang et al., 2018

Stage I-IV EOC

109

Immunomagnetic bead screening, RT-PCR

OS (p = 0.041)

[181]

Poveda et al., 2011

Stage I-IV EOC

216

CellSearch system and reagents

OS (p = 0.0017)

PFS (p = 0.00024)

[183]

Judson et al., 2003

Stage I-IV EOC

64

Immunocytochemical assay

NS

[196]

Aktas et al., 2011

Stage I-IV EOC

122

AdnaTest BreastCancer, RT-PCR

OS (p = 0.0054)

[199]

Chebouti et al., 2017

Stage I-IV EOC

65

AdnaTest Ovarian Cancer, RT-PCR

OS (p = 0.0008)

PFS (p = 0.0293)

[200]

Kuhlamann et al., 2014

Stage I-IV EOC

143

Multiplex RT-PCR, immunomagnetic CTC enrichment

OS (p = 0.026)

PFS (p = 0.009)

[16]

Obermayr et al., 2013

Stage I-IV EOC

216

RT-qPCR, microarray analysis

OS (p = 0.001)

PFS (p = 0.001)

[21]

Obermayr et al., 2017

Stage I-IV EOC

266

Density gradient centrifugation, immunostaining, FISH

OS (p = 0.007)

PFS (p = 0.008)

[201]

ctDNA

Giannopoulou et al., 2017

Stage I-IV EOC

59

Methylation-sensitive high-resolution melting analysis (MS-HRMA) assay

OS (p = 0.023)

[153]

Pereira et al., 2015

Stage I-IV EOC

10

Droplet digital PCR

OS (p = 0.0011)

PFS (p = 0.0194)

[163]

Parkinson et al., 2016

Stage I-IV EOC

40

Microfluidic digital PCR

TTP (p = 0.008)

[164]

Swisher et al., 2005

Stage I-IV EOC

137

DNA sequencing, PCR

OS (p = 0.02)

[58]

Giannopoulou et al., 2018

Stage I-IV EOC

53

Methylation-specific PCR

OS (p = 0.027)

PFS (p = 0.041)

[170]

No et al., 2012

Stage I-IV EOC

36

Copy number assay, qPCR

OS (HR = 33.6, 95% CI = 1.8–634.8)

DFS (HR = 18.2, 95% CI = 2.0–170.0)

[178]

Kuhlmann et al., 2012

Stage I-IV EOC

63

PCR-based fluorescence microsatellite analysis

OS (p = 0.030)

[179]

Pearl et al., 2014

Stage I-IV EOC

129

CAM-based identification platform

CTCs were better correlated with worse OS and PFS compared to CA125

[184]

Pearl et al., 2015

Stage I-IV EOC

123

iCTC flow cytometry assay

CTCs more sensitive to progressive disease and relapse compared to CA125

[185]

Minato et al., 2021

Stage I-IV EOC

11

Droplet digital PCR

Earlier recurrence detection compared to CA125

[195]

Kim et al., 2019

Stage II-IV EOC

61

Droplet digital PCR

TTP (p = 0.038)

[189]

Paracchini et al., 2020

Stage III-IV EOC

46

Shallow whole-genome sequencing

PFS (p = 0.011)

[204]

cfRNA

Zuberi et al., 2015

Stage I-IV EOC

70

Trizol method

Disease progression (p = 0.001)

[189]

Halvorsen et al., 2017

Stage I-IV EOC

207

TaqMan Low Density Arrays, RT-qPCR

OS (p = 0.012)

PFS (p = 0.006)

[203]

Zhang et al., 2019

Stage I-IV EOC

40

liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry

OS (p = 0.0012)

PFS (p = 0.00038)

[186]

Exosomes

Schwich et al., 2019

Stage I-IV EOC

78

Nanoparticle tracking analysis, ELISA

PFS (p = 0.029)

[187]

  1. OS Overall Survival, PFS Progression-Free Survival, NS Not Significant, TTP Time to Progression