Skip to main content

Table 1 Diagnostic application of liquid biopsy in recent 5 years

From: Liquid biopsy at the frontier in renal cell carcinoma: recent analysis of techniques and clinical application

 

Region

Year

Sample

Detection Method

Cohorts

Detected

Abnormality

Practice in

clinical

Result

Ref

CTC

USA

2021

Peripheral blood

VERSA Platform,

Immunofluorescence

29 RCC patients

CK ( +) CTC

counts

Distinguishing

progressing and responding patients

AUC 0.79, Sensitivity 73% and Specificity 100%

[24]

ctDNA/

cfDNA

Japan

2021

Plasma

NGS

dPCR

56 ccRCC patients

31 healthy control

VHL

Detection of RCC

patients

13 VHL mutations were found in 12 of 56 ccRCC patients (21.6%) with median variant frequency of 0.78%

VHL cfDNA mutations were found in 8 of 28 patients (28.6%) with VHL tumor DNA mutations

Patients with VHL cfDNA mutations tended to show a worse OS

[48]

USA

2020

Plasma

Urine

cfMeDIP–seq

NGS

99 RCC patients

28 healthy controls

15 UBC patients

300 DMRs

Detection of RCC

patients

67/69 RCC samples (97.1%) were of a higher median methylation score than all control samples with a mean AUC of 0.990

Same analyses were carried out to urine cfDNA from patients with RCC and healthy controls, with the mean AUC of 0.858

[60]

Distinguishing RCC

and UBC

Using methylation score to compare patients with RCC and UBC, resulting in a mean AUC of 0.979

USA

2020

Plasma

cfMeDIP–seq

Target sequencing

Cohort 1:

40 mRCC patients

Cohort 2:

38 RCC patients

34 healthy controls

Methylation

level of 21 cfDNA variants

Detection of mRCC

patients

cfDNA variant analysis via targeted sequencing detected 21 candidate variants in 11 of 40 mRCC patients (28%), which can improve the sensitivity combined with tumor DNA variant analysis

All of 34 mRCC patients are detected through cfMeDIP–seq (sensitivity 100%, specificity 88%), compared with that cfDNA variant analysis identified variants in 7 patients (21%)

[61]

Canada

2020

Plasma

Target sequencing

55 mRCC patients

VHL, BAP1, PBRM1 et al

Detection of mRCC patients

17 of 51 mRCC patients detected cfDNA variants. The most frequent mutated genes are VHL, BAP1 and PBRM1 (the frequency is 41%, 39%, 17%, respectively). The concordance of mutated genes profiling between cfDNA variants in plasma and tumor DNA variants in matched tissues is 77%

[49]

Japan

2018

Plasma

qPCR

Microfluidics-based platform

92 RCC patients

41 healthy controls

Plasma cfDNA

level

Detection of RCC

patients

AUC 0.762, Sensitivity 63.0% and Specificity 78.1%

[41]

cfRNA

Portugal

2022

Plasma

ddPCR

124 RCC patients

15 oncocytomas patients

64 healthy controls

miR-21-5p

miR-155-5p

Detection of RCC

patients

Sensitivity 89.52%, specificity 54.69% and accuracy 77.66%

[161]

124 RCC patients

miR-21-5p

miR-155-5p

Detection of early stages RCC

Sensitivity 92.42%, specificity 34.38% and accuracy 63.85%

124 RCC patients

15 oncocytomas patients

miR-126-3p

miR-200b-3p

Distinguishing ccRCC

and other RCC subtypes

Sensitivity 80.46%, specificity 56.76% and accuracy 73.39%

Canada

2021

Urine

qPCR

76 ccRCC patients

8 benign renal tumor patients

16 healthy contrls"

Circ-EGLN3

Circ-SOD2

Detection of RCC

patients

69% of samples detected urinary circEGLN3 and 60% of samples detected urinary circACAD11

circEGLN3 levels were significantly different between the healthy controls versus ccRCC patients (P < 0.05)

The AUC of circEGLN3 and circSOD2 was of 0.71 and 0.68, respectively, for distinguishing cancer patients versus non-neoplastic patients

Urinary circEGLN3 level of ccRCC patients was lower than that of healthy controls, while tissue circEGLN3 level was higher of ccRCC patients

[174]

China

2021

Serum

qPCR

123 RCC patients

118 healthy controls

miR-21-5p

miR-150-5p

miR-145-5p

miR-146a-5p

Detection of RCC

patients

AUC 0.938, sensitivity 90.79%, specificity 93.75%

[162]

China

2020

Serum

qPCR

113 RCC patients

79 healthy controls

LncRNA-C00886

Detection of RCC

patients

AUC 0.803, sensitivity 67.09%, specificity 89.87%

[172]

Detection of early stages RCC patients

AUC 0.800, sensitivity 71.05%, specificity 89.87%

 

Detection of non-metastasis RCC patients

AUC 0.830, sensitivity 73.33%, specificity 89.87%

 

Portugal

2020

Urine

qMSP

Cohort 2:

38 ccRCC patients

15 metastasis ccRCC patients

57 healthy controls

Cohort 3:

171 ccRCC patients

85 healthy controls

Methylation level of miR-30a-5p

Detection of ccRCC patients

Detection of metastasis ccRCC patients

Cohort 2: AUC 0.6873, sensitivity 83%, specificity 53%

Cohort 3: AUC 0.6702, sensitivity 63%, specificity 67%

Cohort 2: AUC 0.7684, sensitivity 80%, specificity 71%

[79]

China

2020

Serum

qPCR

146 RCC patients

150 healthy controls

miR-224-5p

miR-34b-3p

miR-182-5p

Detection of RCC

patients

AUC 0.855, sensitivity80.3%, specificity66.3%

[163]

China

2020

Serum

qPCR

Testing cohort:

70 RCC patients

70 healthy controls

Validating cohort:

40 RCC patients

40 healthy controls

miR-20b-5p,

miR-30a-5p,

miR-196a-5p

Detection of RCC

patients

Testing cohort: AUC 0.949, sensitivity 92.8%, specificity 80.0%

Validating cohort: AUC 0.938, sensitivity 92.5%, specificity 80.0%

[164]

Canada

2020

Urine

qPCR

30 oncocytomas patients

26 progressive ccRCC-SRM patients

24 non-progressive ccRCC-SRM patients

9 miRNAs

miR-328-3p

Distinguishing RCC-

SRM and oncocytoma

Detection of ccRCC patients

9 urinary miRNAs were differentially expressed between renal oncocytoma (≤ 4 cm) and ccRCC-SRMs (pT1a; ≤ 4 cm), where miR-432-5p and miR-532-5p showed the most measurable discriminatory ability (AUC 0.71, AUC 0.70, respectively)

miR-328-3p was significantly down-regulated in progressive ccRCC-SRMs and showed significant discriminatory ability (AUC: 0.68)

[79]

China

2018

Serum

qPCR

46 RCC patients

46 healthy controls

LncRNA-GIHCG

Detection of RCC

patients

AUC 0.920, sensitivity 87%, specificity 84.8%

[173]

Detection of early stage RCC patients

AUC 0.886, sensitivity 80.7%, specificity 84.8%

 

Ukraine

2018

Urine

qPCR

52 RCC patients

15 oncocytoma patients

15 healthy controls

miR-15a

Distinguishing RCC and benign renal tumor

AUC 0.955, sensitivity 100%, specificity 98.1%

[169]

Germany

2018

Serum

qPCR

86 ccRCC patients

55 benign renal

tumor patients

28 healthy controls

miR-122-5p

miR-206

Detection of ccRCC patients

AUC 0.733, sensitivity 57.1%, specificity 83.8%

[165]

Protein

India

2021

Serum

Elisa

60 RCC patients

60 non-tumor controls

GRP78

Detection of RCC

patients

AUC 0.739, sensitivity 71.7%, specificity 66.7%

[179]

USA

2021

Plasma

Elisa

143 mRCC patients

137 18–25 years old healthy controls

252 50–80 years old healthy controls

hPG80

Detection of mRCC patients

Compared to 18–25 years old healthy group: AUC 0.93, accuracy 0.89

Compared to 50–80 years old healthy group: AUC 0.84, accuracy 0.77

[180]

Canada

2020

Urine

LC–MS/MS

27 oncocytoma (≤ 4 cm) patients

23 progressive ccRCC-SRM patients

21 non-progressive ccRCC-SRM patients

20 healthy controls

GLRx、CST3、SLC9A3R1、HSPE1、FKBP1a、EEF1G

et al

Detection of early-stage ccRCC patients

GLRx (AUC = 0.72, P = 0.0047) showed the most significant discriminatory ability between ccRCC-SRM and healthy controls, followed by SLC9A3R1 (AUC = 0.70), HSPE1 (AUC = 0.70), FKBP1A (AUC = 0.65) and EEF1G (AUC = 0.65) (P < 0.05)

Diagnostic model based on the expression of 7 proteins (DDT, EEF1G, EPB41L3, HSPE1, MUC4, RAP1B and SLC9A3R1) showed the most significant discriminatory ability (AUC: 0.82), outperforming all single protein markers

[178]

Distinguishing renal oncocytoma (≤ 4 cm)

and early-stage ccRCC

C12orf49 (AUC = 0.77, P = 0.0001) showed the most significant discriminatory ability between ccRCC-SRM and renal oncocytoma, followed by EHD4 (AUC = 0.64, p = 0.049)

Diagnostic model based on the expression of 3 proteins (C12orf49、EHD4 and PPA1) showed the most significant discriminatory ability (AUC: 0.85), outperforming all single protein markers

Distinguishing

progressive and non-progressive early-stage ccRCC

EPS8L2 (AUC = 0.76, p = 0.0037) showed the most significant discriminatory ability between progressive and non-progressive ccRCC-SRM, followed by CHMP2A (AUC = 0.70, p = 0.034), PDCD6IP (AUC = 0.68), CNDP2 (AUC = 0.63) and CEACAM1 (AUC = 0.66)(P < 0.05)

Diagnostic model based on the expression of 2 proteins (EPS8L2 and CCT6A) showed the most significant discriminatory ability (AUC = 0.81), outperforming all single protein markers

USA

2019

Urine

Plasmonic biosensor

20 RCC patients

20 healthy controls

8 BLCA patients

10 diabetic

nephropathy patients

PLIN-2

Detection of RCC

patients

Median urine PLIN-2 concentrations in ccRCC patients (43 ng/mL) were significantly higher (P < 0.001) than healthy groups (0.3 ng/mL), BLCA patients (0.5 ng/mL) and diabetic nephropathy patients (0.6 ng/mL)

[128]

Metabolites

Portugal

2021

Urine

HS–SPME–GC–MS

75 ccRCC patients

75 health control

6 volatiles

metabolites

Detection of RCC

patients

The diagnostic model was consisted of 6 volatile metabolites

The diagnostic ability of ccRCC patients: AUC 0.869, sensitivity 83%, specificity 79%, accuracy 79%

The diagnostic ability of stage I ccRCC patients: AUC 0.799, sensitivity 84%, specificity 73%, accuracy 76%

The diagnostic ability of stage III-IV ccRCC patients: AUC 0.911, sensitivity 83%, specificity 84%, accuracy 84%

[101]

Italy

2021

Urine

GC/MS

Gas sensor array

40 ccRCC patients

8 healthy controls

8 volatiles

metabolites

Detection of ccRCC patients

8 volatile metabolites was differentially expressed in at least 70% ccRCC patients and consisted as a diagnostic model

Analyzed through GC/MS, the diagnostic ability of the model: AUC 0.979, sensitivity 85.7%, specificity 100%, accuracy 92.9% (training cohort); AUC 0.875, sensitivity 83.3%, specificity 100%, accuracy 91.7% (testing cohort)

Analyzed through Gas Sensor Array, the diagnostic ability of the model: AUC 0.979, sensitivity 100%, specificity 85.7%, accuracy 92.9% (training cohort); AUC 0.906, sensitivity 100%, specificity 83.3%, accuracy 91.7% (testing cohort)

[102]

Germany

2021

Urine

LC–MS

NMR

41 early stage RCC patients

29 advanced stage RCC patients

16 urinary metabolites

Distinguishing early and advanced stage RCC patients

A model consisting of 16 metabolites was used for distinguishing early and advanced stage RCC patients: AUC 0.95, sensitivity 80%, specificity 91%, accuracy 86%

[105]

China

2020

Urine

LC–MS

39 RCC patients

22 benign renal tumor patients

68 healthy controls

6 urinary

metabolites

Distinguishing RCC and benign renal tumor

A model consisting of 3 metabolites (cortolone, testosterone and l-2-aminoadipate adenylate) was used for benign and malignant renal tumor distinction: AUC 0.868, sensitivity 75%, specificity 100% (tenfold cross-validation of testing cohort)

[175]

Detection of RCC

patients

A model consisting of 3 metabolites (aminoadipic acid, 2-(formamido)-N1-(5-phospho-d-ribosyl) acetamidine and alpha-N-phenylacetyl-l-glutamine) was used for detection RCC patients: AUC 0.841, sensitivity 75%, specificity 88.6% (tenfold cross-validation of testing cohort)

Japan

2020

Urine

LC–MS

69 stage I-II RCC patients

18 stage III-IV RCC patients

60 benign renal tumor patients

9 urinary

metabolites

Distinguishing RCC and benign renal tumor

A model consisting of 5 metabolites (L-glutamic acid, lactate, D-sedoheptulose 7-phosphate, 2-hy-droxyglutarate and myoinositol) was used for detection RCC patients: AUC 0.966, sensitivity 93.1%, specificity 95%

[176]

Poland

2020

Urine

AuNPET LDI MS

50 RCC patients

50 healthy controls

15 urinary metabolites

Detection of RCC

patients

15 urinary metabolites were identified abnormal distribution in RCC patients' urine (7 upregulation and 8 downregulation), where 3,5-Dihydroxyphenylvaleric acid showed the most significant diagnostic value (AUC 0.844)

A model consisting of all 15 metabolites was used for detecting RCC patients: AUC 0.915, efficiency 88%, efficiency 86%

[103]

China

2019

Urine

UPLC-MS

146 BLCA patients

115 RCC patients

142 healthy controls

16 urinary metabolites

Detection of RCC

patients

A model consisting of 6 metabolites (α-CEHC, β-cortolone, deoxyinosine, flunisolide, 11b,17a,21-trihydroxypreg-nenolone and glycerol tripropanoate) was used for distinguishing cancer patients from healthy controls: AUC 0.950 (discovering group); AUC 0.867 (external validating group)

[104]

Distinguishing BLCA

and RCC patients

without hematuria

A model consisting of 6 metabolites (4-ethoxymethylphenol, prostaglandin F2b, thromboxane B3, hydroxybutyrylcarnitine, 3-hydroxyphloretin and N'-formylkynurenine) was used for distinguishing BLCA and RCC patients without hematuria: AUC 0.829 in discovering group; AUC 0.76 in external validating group

Distinguishing BLCA

and RCC patients with hematuria

A model consisting of 4 metabolites (1-hydroxy-2-oxopropyl tetrahydropterin, 1-acetoxy-2-hydroxy-16-heptadecyn-4-one, 1,2dehydrosalsolinol and L-tyrosine) was used for distinguishing BLCA and RCC patients with hematuria: AUC 0.913 (discovering group)

China

2019

Urine

LC–MS

100 RCC patients

34 benign renal

tumor patients

129 healthy controls

18 urinary metabolites

Detection of RCC

patients

A model consisting of 9 metabolites (N-Jasmonoyltyrosine, Tetrahydroaldosterone-3-glucuronide, Androstenedione, Dopamine 4-sulfate, 3-Methylazelaic acid, Cortolone-3-glucuronide, 7alpha-hydroxy-3-oxochol-4-en-24-oic Acid, Cortolone-3-glucuronide and Lithocholyltaurine) was used for distinguishing cancer patients from healthy controls: AUC 0.905 (testing cohort); AUC 0.885 (validating cohort)

N'-formylkynurenine showed a significant discriminating ability of detecting RCC patients (AUC 0.808, sensitivity 84.8%, specificity 83.8%)

[177]

Distinguishing RCC

and benign renal tumor

A model consisting of 3 metabolites (L-3-hydroxykynurenine, 1,7-dimethylguanosine and tetrahydroaldosterone-3-glucuronide) was used for distinguishing RCC patients from benign renal tumor patients: AUC 0.834 in testing cohort; AUC 0.816 for tenfold cross-validation

Distinguishing early and late stages of RCC

A model consisting of 5 metabolites (thymidine, cholic acid glucuronide, alanyl-proline, isoleucyl-hydroxyproline, and myristic acid) was used for distinguishing early (stage I-II) from late stages (stage III-IV) of RCC: AUC 0.881 in testing cohort; AUC 0.813 for tenfold cross-validation

Exosome

Spain

2021

Plasma

Differential ultracentrifugation,

qPCR,

NGS,

dPCR

13 RCC patients

15 healthy controls

Exosomal mtDNA

VH1, CγB

Detection of RCC

patients

dPCR and qPCR demonstrated that VH1 and CγB were of a significant discrimination ability for RCC and healthy group (F phase)

VH1: AUC = 0.825, P < 0.0001 for VH1-short; AUC = 0.833, P < 0.0001 for VH1-long

CγB: AUC = 0.755, P < 0.0001 for CγB-short; AUC = 0.810, P < 0.0001 for CγB-long

[183]

China

2020

Plasma

exoEasy maxi kit,

qPCR

22 RCC patients

16 healthy controls

Exosomal miRNA

miR-92a-1-5p,

miR-149-3p,

miR-424-3p

Detection of RCC

patients

Compared with healthy controls, the levels of exsomal miR-149-3p and miR-424-3p were significantly up-regulated, while miR-92a-1-5p was down-regulated

miR-149-3p: AUC 0.7188, sensitivity 75.0%, specificity 72.7%

miR-424-3p: AUC 0.7727, sensitivity 75.0%, specificity 81.8%

miR-149-3p: AUC 0.8324, sensitivity 87.5%, specificity 77.3%

[181]

China

2019

Urine

Differential ultracentrifugation,

Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer,

NGS

70 early‐stage ccRCC patients

30 early‐stage PC patients

30 early‐stage BLCA patients

30 healthy controls

Exosomal miRNA

miR-30c-5p

Detection of ccRCC patients

Exosomal miRNA miR-30c-5p levels in ccRCC patients' urine were significantly lower than those in healthy controls, where was no significant differences between BLCA cancers, PC cancers and healthy controls

The diagnostic value of exosomal miR-30c-5p for ccRCC patients: AUC 0.819, sensitivity 68.57%, specificity 100%

[182]

China

2018

Serum

Total exosome isolation reagent,

EpCAM isolation beads,

Flow cytometry

82 ccRCC patients received nephrectomy

80 healthy controls

Exosomal miRNA

miR-210,

miR-1233

Detection of RCC

patients

Exosomal miRNA miR-210 and miR-1233 levels in ccRCC patients' serum were significantly lower than those in healthy controls

miR-210: AUC 0.69, sensitivity 70%, specificity 62.2%

miR-1233: AUC 0.82, sensitivity 81%, specificity 76%

[153]