Open Access

Mitochondrial Hsp90s suppress calcium-mediated stress signals propagating from mitochondria to the ER in cancer cells

  • Hye-Kyung Park1,
  • Ji-Eun Lee1,
  • Jaehwa Lim1 and
  • Byoung Heon Kang1Email author
Molecular Cancer201413:148

https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-4598-13-148

Received: 19 March 2014

Accepted: 5 June 2014

Published: 12 June 2014

Abstract

Background

Resistance to cell death in the presence of stressful stimuli is one of the hallmarks of cancer cells acquired during multistep tumorigenesis, and knowledge of the molecular mechanism of stress adaptation can be exploited to develop cancer-selective therapeutics. Mitochondria and the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) are physically interconnected organelles that can sense and exchange various stress signals. Although there have been many studies on stress propagation from the ER to mitochondria, reverse stress signals originating from mitochondria have not been well reported.

Methods

After inactivation of the proteins by pharmacologic and genetic methods, the signal pathways were analyzed by fluorescence microscopy, flow cytometry, MTT assay, and western blotting. A mouse xenograft model was used to examine synergistic anticancer activity and the action mechanism of drugs in vivo.

Results

We show in this study that mitochondrial heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90) suppresses mitochondria-initiated calcium-mediated stress signals propagating into the ER in cancer cells. Mitochondrial Hsp90 inhibition triggers the calcium signal by opening the mitochondrial permeability transition pore and, in turn, the ER ryanodine receptor, via calcium-induced calcium release. Subsequent depletion of ER calcium activates unfolded protein responses in the ER lumen, thereby increasing the expression of a pro-apoptotic transcription factor, CEBP homologous protein (CHOP). Combined treatment with the ER stressor thapsigargin and the mitochondrial Hsp90 inhibitor gamitrinib augmented interorganelle stress signaling by elevating CHOP expression, and showed synergistic cytotoxic activity exclusively in cancer cells in vitro and in vivo.

Conclusions

Collectively, mitochondrial Hsp90s confer cell death resistance to cancer cells by suppressing the mitochondria-initiated calcium-mediated interorganelle stress response.

Keywords

Mitochondrial Hsp90s Mitochondrial permeability transition pore Ryanodine receptor Calcium signaling Combination cancer therapy

Background

Molecular chaperones assist in the correct folding and conformational changes of their substrates, called client proteins, and minimize their misfolding and aggregation [1]. Heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90) is an ATP-dependent molecular chaperone regulating the stability and functions of client proteins that are often involved in signal transduction during malignant transformation and progression [2, 3]. Organelle-resident Hsp90 family proteins are present in mitochondria and the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), where they control protein homeostasis [46]. Hsp90 and its mitochondrial homolog, tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated protein 1 (TRAP1), are abundant in the mitochondria of many cancer cells [710], and their regulation, client proteins, and cellular functions are quite different from the cytoplasmic Hsp90 pool [4, 11]. Mitochondrial Hsp90s are involved in tumor progression, cytoprotection, and multidrug resistance, by reprogramming cancer cell metabolism [1216] and maintaining mitochondrial membrane integrity [7, 17, 18].

Mitochondria integrate lethal and vital signals emanating from various cellular compartments to cause cell death through inner and outer membrane permeabilization [19]. Though the molecular mechanism is not fully elucidated, cyclophilin D (Cyp-D) is believed to regulate the permeability transition pore (PTP) in the mitochondrial inner membrane [2024]. Cancer cells elevate mitochondrial Hsp90 expression, which suppresses Cyp-D function to inhibit the deadly increase of membrane permeability in the organelle [7]. PTP opening upon Cyp-D activation increases mitochondrial inner membrane permeability toward small molecules (<1,500 Da), resulting in loss of mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨ m), discharge of matrix calcium stores, and swelling and rupture of the mitochondrial outer membrane [19, 25].

Calcium, a ubiquitous second messenger, is involved in a broad variety of physiological events via its interaction with effectors responsible for calcium-dependent processes [26]. The ER and mitochondria are the major intracellular calcium stores, regulating calcium homeostasis and signaling [27, 28]. They have a largely interconnected architecture with numerous contacts, which facilitates inter-organelle calcium transport by generating calcium hotspots proximal to open calcium channels [2931]. Both the ER and mitochondria contain calcium-triggered calcium release channels that can activate each other via positive feedback, including ryanodine receptors (RyRs) and inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptors (IP3Rs) [19, 32]. There is a growing consensus that ER-mitochondria calcium crosstalk can coordinate signaling for metabolism and cell death between the organelles [28].

Although calcium signaling has been intensively studied, reports of “mitochondria-initiated” calcium crosstalk between mitochondria and the ER are scarce. Here, we demonstrate a novel function of mitochondrial Hsp90s that confers resistance to cancer cell death by inhibiting the propagation of mitochondrial-origin calcium signals to the ER.

Results

Mitochondrial Hsp90s modulate the mitochondrial calcium store

To investigate whether mitochondrial Hsp90s modulate mitochondrial calcium stores, we used the mitochondria-targeted Hsp90 inhibitor gamitrinib, a conjugated of triphenylphosphonium (a mitochondria-targeting moiety) and geldanamycin (an Hsp90 inhibitor) [33, 34]. A cytotoxic dose (30 μM) of gamitrinib dramatically increased the intracellular calcium concentration within an hour in human cervical (HeLa), prostate (22Rv1), and breast (MDA-MB-231) cancer cell lines in calcium-free medium (Figure 1A and B). A non-targeted Hsp90 inhibitor, 17-allylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin (17AAG), did not increase cytosolic calcium (Additional file 1: Figure S1A), consistent with a previous report that gamitrinib is specific to mitochondrial Hsp90 without affecting cytosolic Hsp90 function [33]. After gamitrinib treatment, PTP opening and loss of mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm) occurred within 30 minutes (Figure 1C, TMRM staining), whereas cytochrome c release, caspase activation, and cell death were not prominent until after 2 hours (Figure 1C, cytochrome c staining; Figure 1D), suggesting that calcium flux concurs with PTP opening, prior to mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization (MOMP). Consistently, cytosolic calcium elevation was inhibited by cyclosporin A (CsA) (Figure 1E), a potent Cyp-D inhibitor, blocking PTP opening [19]. Thus, mitochondrial Hsp90 inhibition immediately induces PTP opening, loss of ΔΨm, and discharge of the calcium stored in the mitochondrial matrix. Thereafter, a cascade of MOMP, cytochrome c release, and caspase activation ensues (Figure 1F).
Figure 1

Mitochondrial Hsp90s modulate the mitochondrial calcium store. (A) Time course of cytosolic calcium increase. The ratio of the emission fluorescence intensities at 340 and 380 nm excitation of Fura-2 labeled HeLa cells in calcium-free medium was measured after 30 μM gamitrinib treatment as described in Materials and Methods. (B) Increase of cytosolic calcium in 22Rv1 and MDA-MB-231 cells. Fura-2 fluorescence ratio after 30 μM gamitrinib (Gami) treatment for 1 hour was calculated. Data are the mean ± SEM of duplicated experiments and collected from 40 regions of interest (ROIs). (C) Mitochondrial membrane permeabilization. TMRM-loaded HeLa cells were imaged to measure mitochondrial membrane potential depolarization (ΔΨm) (left); alternatively, cytochrome c redistribution was analyzed (right) at the indicated times after 30 μM gamitrinib treatment as previously described [35]. White bar, 20 μm. (D) Caspase activation and cell death induction. After 30 μM gamitrinib treatment, HeLa cells were labeled with FITC-DEVD-fmk (left, DEVDase activity) or propidium iodide (right, PI staining) and analyzed by flow cytometry at the selected time points. (E) Cyclosporin A (CsA) blocks cytosolic calcium increase. Cytosolic calcium changes in Fura-2-labeled HeLa cells treated for 1 hour with 5 μM CsA and/or 30 μM gamitrinib were analyzed. Bar, 50 μm. (F) Summary of sequential events following mitochondrial Hsp90 inhibition. PTP opening is directly linked with the loss of ΔΨm and increase of cytosolic calcium. The calcium flux occurs prior to mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization (MOMP) and cytochrome c release. *, p < 0.0001.

Mitochondrial calcium release results in depletion of ER calcium

The PTP opening has been shown to immediately discharge calcium stored in the mitochondria [36]; however, after mitochondrial Hsp90 inhibition in this study, calcium release continued even after a significant drop in ΔΨm (Figure 1A and C), suggestive of additional sources of calcium flux. We postulated that the primary calcium-storing organelle, the ER, contributes to the cytosolic calcium increase after gamitrinib treatment. To prove this, we directly measured calcium depletion using the calcium sensor protein, Cameleon, targeted to mitochondria and the ER (mtCameleon and D1ER, respectively) [37]. Gamitrinib treatment resulted in FRET signal loss in both mtCameleon- and D1ER-transfected HeLa cells, comparable to that seen with FCCP or Thap treatment (Figure 2A and B), clearly indicating calcium depletion in the ER as well as in mitochondria. Consistent with previous reports [33], gamitrinib has no effect on the ΔΨm of a normal MCF10A breast cell (Additional file 1: Figure S1B and C), and the non-targeted Hsp90 inhibitor 17AAG did not affect the mtCameleon FRET signal (Additional file 1: Figure S1D).
Figure 2

Inhibition of mitochondrial Hsp90s depletes stored calcium in both mitochondria and the ER. (A) Mitochondrial calcium depletion. After 30 μM gamitrinib and 10 μM FCCP treatment, confocal FRET images of mtCameleon-expressing HeLa cells were reconstructed from their emission fluorescence ratios at 535/480 nm with excitation at 440 nm (left). FRET ratios at the indicated time intervals were averaged and plotted (right). (B) ER calcium depletion. FRET images of HeLa cells transiently expressing D1ER were acquired at the indicated time points after gamitrinib treatment (left) and analyzed to plot the FRET ratio (right). Selected ROIs are indicated as white circles. Bar, 10 μm. Data in (A) and (B) are mean ± SEM collected from 30 ROIs. R.U., relative units. (C) CHOP induction and eIF2α phosphorylation. HeLa cells were treated with 30 μM gamitrinib, 5 μM CsA, and 10 μM BAPTA as indicated and analyzed by western blotting. #, not significant; *, p < 0.001; **, p < 0.0001.

Calcium depletion in the ER evokes the unfolded protein response and induces CHOP activation

Gamitrinib has been reported to trigger the unfolded protein response in mitochondria, and, through unknown mechanisms, to subsequently activate CHOP, the pro-apoptotic transcription factor often induced during unfolded protein responses in the ER (UPRER) [4, 3840]. siRNA knockdown of the mitochondrial Hsp90 homolog TRAP1 results in spliced XBP1 mRNA production and eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2α (eIF2α) phosphorylation (Additional file 1: Figure S2A and B), suggesting activation of UPRER sensor proteins such as inositol-requiring protein 1α (IRE1α) and PKR-like ER kinase [41, 42]. Consistently, pharmacological inactivation of mitochondrial Hsp90s by gamitrinib also triggered eIF2α phosphorylation and XBP1 mRNA splicing (Figure 2C; Additional file 1: Figure S2C). In addition to UPRER sensor protein activation, CHOP induction was clearly seen after both pharmacological and genetic inhibition of mitochondrial chaperones (Figure 2C; Additional file 1: Figure S2D). To investigate the critical involvement of mitochondrial calcium discharge through the PTP for the ER stress response, gamitrinib was administered in the presence or absence of the PTP inhibitor CsA and the calcium chelator BAPTA. Both substances compromised UPRER induction, resulting in a dramatic reduction in eIF2α phosphorylation and CHOP expression (Figure 2C).

Ryanodine receptors mediate mitochondrial calcium-induced calcium depletion in the ER

IP3Rs and RyRs are ER membrane channels responsible for calcium release from the organelle [26]. Silencing IP3R1, the major isoform in HeLa cells [43] (Additional file 1: Figure S3A), did not affect the elevation of cytosolic calcium and the induction of CHOP after gamitrinib treatment (Figure 3A and B), but was enough to compromise lysophosphatidic acid-induced ER calcium release in calcium-free medium (Additional file 1: Figure S3B). By contrast, specific RyR inhibitors such as ryanodine (100 μM) and tetracaine (300 μM) [44] strongly inhibited gamitrinib-induced ER calcium release, similar to the PTP inhibitor CsA (Figure 3C). Genetic knockdown of RyR2, the dominant RyR isoform in HeLa cells [4547], also blocked gamitrinib-induced cytoplasmic calcium increase (Figure 3D). Consistently, ryanodine and RyR2-specific siRNAs inhibited eIF2α phosphorylation and the subsequent CHOP induction (Figure 3E and F). Collectively, our data suggest that RyR, not IP3R, is the ER sensor that propagates the signal initiated by discharged calcium from mitochondria in cancer cells.
Figure 3

Ryanodine receptor (RyR)-mediated cytosolic calcium elevation. (A) IP3R silencing. After IP3R siRNA treatment, Fura-2 labeled HeLa cells were treated with 30 μM gamitrinib for 1 hour. The fluorescence ratio (340/380) was plotted. The data are mean ± SEM collected from 30 ROIs in two independent experiments. (B) IP3R knockdown effect on CHOP expression. Control or IP3R1 siRNA-transfected HeLa cells were incubated with or without 30 μM gamitrinib for 2 hours. Cell extracts were analyzed by western blotting. (C) RyR inhibitors compromise cytosolic calcium increase. Fura-2 labeled HeLa cells were treated with 30 μM gamitrinib for an hour in the presence or absence of 300 μM tetracaine, 100 μM ryanodine, and 5 μM CsA, and emission fluorescence intensity ratios (340/380 nm excitation) were measured. Data are mean ± SEM calculated from 40 ROIs in two independent experiments. (D) Fura-2 imaging and RyR2 silencing. Control or RyR2-#2 siRNA-treated HeLa cells were labeled with Fura-2 and imaged after 30 μM gamitrinib treatment for an hour (left). The fluorescence ratio (340/380) was plotted (middle). Knockdown efficiency of RyR2-#2 siRNA by western blotting (right). The data are mean ± SEM collected from 30 ROIs in two independent experiments. Bar, 50 μm. (E) Inhibition of CHOP induction by RyR inactivation. HeLa cells were treated with 30 μM gamitrinib in the presence or absence of 100 μM ryanodine. Cell extracts were analyzed by western blotting. (F) RyR2 silencing and CHOP expression. HeLa cells were treated with two different RyR2 siRNAs, incubated with 30 μM gamitrinib, for 2 hours and analyzed by western blotting. #, not significant; *, p < 0.0001.

Mitochondria-initiated calcium signaling plays an important role in setting up the cell death threshold

Impaired mitochondrial function [16] (Figure 4A, TMRM staining) and slightly elevated cytoplasmic calcium (Figure 4A, Fluo-4 staining) were frequently found in gamitrinib-treated cells, even at non-toxic dose of the drug. Therefore, we hypothesized that calcium-mediated stress propagation can render cells sensitive to additional stresses, i.e. lowering the cell death threshold. A representative UPRER inducer, Thap, was combined with gamitrinib to test this hypothesis. Gamitrinib sensitized cancer cells to Thap treatment at various concentrations, while the non-targeted Hsp90 inhibitor 17AAG did not (Figure 4B and C). Consistent with pharmacological data, TRAP1 knockdown also sensitized cancer cells to Thap treatment (Additional file 1: Figure S4). The combination of gamitrinib and Thap synergistically induced apoptotic cell death, causing a dramatic increase in caspase activity (Figure 4D).
Figure 4

Inhibition of mitochondrial Hsp90s sensitizes HeLa cells toward thapsigargin. (A) Cytoplasmic calcium and mitochondrial membrane potential by suboptimal dose of gamitrinib. Fluo-4 or TMRM/MitoTracker-labeled HeLa cells were incubated with 5 μM gamitrinib for 24 hours and analyzed by confocal microscope. Bar, 20 μm. (B) Combination effect in HeLa. HeLa cells were treated with various concentrations of Thap in the presence of 5 μM of either 17AAG or gamitrinib, and analyzed by MTT assay (left). Alternatively, HeLa cells were treated with 5 μM gamitrinib and/or 0.06 μM Thap for 24 hours and analyzed by the MTT assay. ***, p < 0.0001. (C) Combination effect in 22Rv1. 22Rv1 cells were treated with various concentrations of thapsigargin in the presence of 2.5 μM of either 17AAG or gamitrinib for 24 hours, and analyzed by the MTT assay (left). Alternatively, 22Rv1 cells were treated with 2.5 μM gamitrinib (Gami) and 0.06 μM Thap as indicated for 24 hours and analyzed by the MTT assay. **, p = 0.0006. (D) Combination treatment induces apoptosis. HeLa cells were treated with 10 μM gamitrinib and 0.5 μM Thap as indicated, labeled with FITC-DEVD-fmk and propidium iodide, and analyzed by flow cytometry. (B) and (C) represent mean ± SEM from three independent experiments.

Gamitrinib and Thap together elevate CHOP expression in an RyR-dependent manner

Proapoptotic CHOP expression induced by combination treatment with gamitrinib and Thap was faster and higher compared to single-agent treatment (Figure 5A). A cell-based reporter assay also showed elevated CHOP transcription activity following combination treatment (Figure 5B). siRNA-mediated knockdown of either CHOP or RyR significantly suppressed this increased cytotoxic activity, but did not affect the toxicity seen with single-agent treatment (Figure 5C and D), suggesting important roles of RyR and CHOP in the drug combination effect. Silencing RyR compromised CHOP induction by the drug combination but not by single-agent treatment (Figure 5E), further confirming that RyR opening is an essential upstream event in the stress response elevating CHOP expression. CHOP-dependent death receptor 5 (DR5) expression [48] has been reported before, but was not involved in the drug combination, considering marginal elevation of DR5 expression and no activation of caspase-8 (Additional file 1: Figure S5A) [49]. Neither did reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavengers affect the increase in cytoplasmic calcium and CHOP induction (Additional file 1: Figure S5B and C). Collectively, our data argue that gamitrinib lowers the cellular threshold against ER stresses by increasing CHOP expression in an RyR-dependent manner.
Figure 5

Gamitrinib and Thap combination treatment elevates CHOP expression. (A) Synergistic increase in CHOP induction. 22Rv1 and H460 cells were treated with 5 μM gamitrinib and 0.06 μM Thap as indicated and analyzed by western blotting. (B) CHOP reporter assay. PC3 cells stably transfected with a CHOP::GFP reporter plasmid [50] were incubated with 2.5 μM gamitrinib and/or 0.02 μM Thap as indicated and analyzed as described in Materials and Methods (left). Cells with more than twice the background fluorescence intensity were considered as positive cells (right). Bar, 100 μm. Mean ± SEM. **, p = 0.0036. (C) Silencing CHOP expression. Control or CHOP siRNA-transfected HeLa cells were treated with 0.06 μM Thap and 5 μM gamitrinib for 24 hours, and analyzed by MTT assay. Knockdown efficiency analyzed by western blotting (bottom right). Mean ± SEM. *, p < 0.05. (D) Silencing RyR expression. Control or RyR siRNA-treated HeLa cells were incubated with 0.06 μM Thap and 5 μM gamitrinib for 24 hours, and analyzed by MTT assay. Knockdown efficiency analyzed by western blotting (bottom right). Mean ± SEM. *, p < 0.05. (E) Knockdown of RyR2 by siRNA. Control or RyR2 siRNA-transfected 22Rv1 cells were incubated with 2.5 μM gamitrinib and/or 0.06 μM Thap as indicated and analyzed by western blotting.

Combined synergistic anticancer activities in vivo

The mitochondrial Hsp90 pool is dramatically elevated in many cancer cells to cope with various stresses, but expression is very low or undetectable in most normal tissues except brain and testis [7, 8, 10, 51, 52]. To test whether mitochondrial Hsp90-regulated interorganelle calcium signaling is functional in normal cells, we examined primary astrocytes from mouse brain, where Hsp90 expression in mitochondria is higher than in other tissues [7]. Gamitrinib did not affect CHOP induction and eIF2α phosphorylation (Figure 6A), whereas Thap increased CHOP expression in astrocytes (Additional file 1: Figure S6A). Gamitrinib treatment in combination with Thap did not sensitize astrocytes (Figure 6B), possibly due to very low expression of both TRAP1 and Cyp-D in astrocytes compared to cancer cells (Figure 6C). Collectively, gamitrinib does not affect the cell death threshold in astrocytes, probably due to the limited contribution of the chaperones to PTP opening in normal cells; this is in stark contrast with data from cancer cells (Figure 4B-D). Next, the gamitrinib and Thap combination was further examined using a xenograft of relapsed prostate cancer cells (22Rv1) [53], to test whether the cancer cell-specific lowering of the cell death threshold occurs in vivo. Because Thap has been reported to be highly toxic in vivo[54], we administered a very low dose of the drug. Suboptimal individual doses of Thap and gamitrinib did not result in significant inhibition of tumor growth, whereas combined treatment inhibited tumor growth (Figure 6D) without remarkable histological abnormalities and body weight changes (Additional file 1: Figure S6B and C). Individual treatment with either gamitrinib or Thap slightly elevated CHOP expression, whereas combined treatment further elevated CHOP expression synergistically in cancer cells, but not in the brain or liver (Figure 6E; Additional file 1: Figure S6D). Therefore, similar to the in vitro data, mitochondrial Hsp90 inhibition lowers the cell death threshold of cancer cells to Thap treatment in vivo.
Figure 6

Synergistic cancer-specific cytotoxicity in vivo . (A) CHOP induction in astrocytes. Astrocytes treated with 30 μM gamitrinib for 2 hours were analyzed by western blotting. (B) Thap in combination with gamitrinib. Astrocytes were treated with various concentrations of Thap in the presence of 0, 2.5, 5, or 10 μM gamitrinib and the cell viability was analyzed by MTT assay. Data are from three independent experiments. (C) TRAP1 expression in astrocytes. TRAP1 and cyclophilin D (Cyp-D) expression in astrocytes isolated from mouse brain was compared with cancer cell lines by western blotting. (D) Tumor xenograft experiment. Subcutaneous 22Rv1 xenografts were established as described in Materials and Methods. At the end of the experiment, final tumor volumes were plotted (right). We used five mice per group and two tumors per animal. (E) Analysis of CHOP expression in liver and tumor. Liver and tumor samples from three randomly selected mice for each treatment (total 12 mice) were analyzed by western blotting (left). After normalization of CHOP band intensities with β-actin, relative CHOP intensities were calculated (right). (F) Schematic diagram of the mitochondria-initiated stress signal. Chemical inhibitors are indicated in red. (B), (D), and (E) are the mean ± SEM. ***, p = 0.0003; *, p = 0.039; #, p > 0.1.

Discussion

Mitochondria are integrators of various cellular stress signals that eventually make life-or-death decisions. We show here that mitochondria can also produce calcium-mediated stress signals and propagate them to neighboring organelles. For calcium signaling, interplay between the permeability transition pore (PTP) in mitochondria and ryanodine receptor (RyR) in ER was essential, and the mitochondrial Hsp90 pool negatively modulates signal commencement in cancer cells to protect them from cellular stresses.

TRAP1 knockdown by siRNA showed a similar phenotype to simultaneous inactivation of both Hsp90 and TRAP1 by gamitrinib. Considering functional overlap between Hsp90 and TRAP1 in the regulation of PTP in cancer cells [7, 55], the lack of functional compensation by the mitochondrial Hsp90 is quite unexpected, and may suggest different protein interaction networks between Hsp90 and TRAP1, or alternatively, that TRAP1 functionally dominates over Hsp90 in cancer mitochondria. There is growing consensus that mitochondrial Hsp90 and TRAP1 play important roles in neoplastic progression by modulating a variety of mitochondrial pathways: metabolic reprogramming, mitochondrial dynamics, reactive oxygen species, autophagy, and cell death [55, 56]. Thus, to clearly address their roles in mitochondrial homeostasis and tumorigenesis, the relative contribution of the chaperones to the mitochondrial signal pathways and the functional relationship between them should first be discovered.

Calcium, in such stress signaling, does not merely mediate mitochondria-ER communication, but is also critical for PTP and RyR calcium channel opening. Calcium released through one of the channels can trigger the opening of the other through calcium-induced calcium release (CICR) [19, 32], which can eventually amplify signals even with minute perturbation of mitochondrial chaperone functions (Figure 6F). Interestingly, IP3Rs, major ER calcium channels allegedly requiring the ligand IP3 as well as calcium for CICR [44], are not involved in mitochondria-initiated calcium signaling, which further argues that the mitochondria-initiated pathway occurs through genuine CICR that is solely dependent on discharged calcium.

Interplay and subsequent signal amplification between the calcium channels are crucial to signaling, as inhibition of either the PTP or RyR blocked calcium signaling. The unknown mechanism of CHOP induction after inactivation of mitochondrial Hsp90s in previous reports [4, 3840] can be explained by this interplay. Furthermore, local calcium increases, seen as calcium hot-spots after low-dose gamitrinib treatment (Fluo-4 staining in Figure 4B), seem to be the consequence of the calcium channel interplay, which is sufficient to provoke global mitochondrial membrane potential reduction and UPRER induction. Without a large increase in cytoplasmic calcium concentration, this is sufficient to propagate the stress response, probably due to the closely apposed architecture of the mitochondria and ER [2931]. Thus, mitochondria-initiated calcium signaling might be further supported by the physical interconnection between mitochondria and the ER, which forms a specialized microdomain of transient calcium [28, 57] and can facilitate reciprocal PTP and RyR activation via CICR.

Target-centered anticancer drugs often show limited efficacies, poor safety, and resistance profiles due to complicated signaling networks in many cancer cells [58, 59]. Multicomponent and system-oriented therapeutics development approaches could provide a solution [60, 61]. The target proteins of gamitrinib and Thap have fundamentally different functions in distinct organelles [34, 62, 63]. When combined, their anticancer activities were enhanced and non-toxic doses of the drugs were sufficient in vitro and in vivo to kill cancer, but not normal cells, through calcium-mediated coordination of compartmentalized signaling networks and synergistic elevation of CHOP expression. These pharmacological data further support the function of mitochondrial Hsp90s as important regulators of interorganelle crosstalk, increasing the stress threshold, and identify these proteins as drug targets for the development of novel combination cancer therapy. Thus, we believe that mitochondrial Hsp90 inhibitors require further system-oriented investigation to facilitate the development of an effective and better multicomponent anticancer regimen by combining antitumor drugs or even non-antitumor drugs capable of inducing organelle stress.

Conclusions

Mitochondria-initiated and calcium-mediated propagation of the stress signal plays an important role in coordinating ER and mitochondrial stress responses, and is implicated in lowering the cell death threshold in cancer cells. Therefore, targeting the coordinated calcium stress signaling pathway often suppressed in cancer cells might be a feasible and effective strategy for the rational development of cancer therapeutics.

Materials and methods

Cells and culture condition

HeLa, MDA-MB-231, and NCI-H460 cells were purchased from the Korean Cell Line Bank and 22Rv1 from the American Type Culture Collection. Cell lines were maintained as recommended by supplier. Cells were cultured in DMEM or RPMI medium (Lonza) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; GIBCO) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (GIBCO) at 37°C in a 5% CO2 humidified atmosphere.

Chemicals, plasmids and antibodies

Gamitrinib conjugated with triphenylphosphonium was prepared as described previously [33]. MitoTracker, Fura-2-AM, and tetramethylrhodamine methyl ester (TMRM) were purchased from Molecular Probes, Ryanodine was from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Mn(III) tetrakis(1-methyl-4-pyridyl) porphyrin (MnTMPyP) was from Calbiochem. 1,2-bis(o-aminophenoxy) ethane-N,N,N’,N’-tetraacetic acid acetoxymethyl ester (BAPTA), cyclosporine A (CsA), carbonyl cyanide 4-(trifluoromethoxy) phenylhydrazone (FCCP), tetracaine, and thapsigargin (Thap), and N-acetylcysteine (NAC) and all other chemicals, were from Sigma.

Anti-CEBP homologous protein (CHOP) antibodies were obtained from Cell Signaling; anti-RyR, anti-IP3R, anti-eIF2α and anti-cytochrome c antibodies from Santa Cruz Biotechnology; anti-cyclopholin D from Calbiochem; anti-eIF2α[pS52] from Invitrogen; anti-β-actin from MP Biomedicals; and anti-TRAP1 from BD Biosciences.

Astrocyte preparation

Primary cultures of astrocytes were prepared as previously described [64]. Briefly, the mouse brain cortex, after removing the meninges, was dissected and dissociated with moderate pipetting. Cells were plated on 100-mm dishes coated with 10 μg/ml poly-D-lysine (Sigma) and grown to confluence in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS, 10% horse serum (GIBCO), 100 units/ml penicillin, and 100 μg/ml streptomycin at 37°C in a 5% CO2 humidified atmosphere. Afterward, astrocytes were trypsinized and plated on 6-well plates coated with poly-D-lysine to administer drugs.

siRNA treatment

Small interfering RNAs (siRNA) against TRAP1, RyR2, IP3R, and CHOP were synthesized by Genolution (Korea) as follows:

RyR2-#1, 5′-AAGTGGTTCTGCAGTGCACCG; RyR2-#2, 5′-AAGTACGAGTTGGAGATGACC; TRAP1-#1, 5′- AAACATGAGTTCCAGGCCGAG; TRAP1-#2, 5′- CCCGGTCCCTGTACTCAGAAA; IP3R1-#1, 5′-GAGAATTTCCTTGTAGACATCTGCA; IP3R1-#2, 5′-GGCCTGAGAGTTACGTGGCAGAAAT; IP3R2, 5′-GAGAAGGCTCGATGCTGAGACTTGA; IP3R3, 5′-CCGAGATGACAAGAAGAACAAGTTT; CHOP-#1, 5′-AGAACCAGCAGAGGTCACAA; CHOP-#2, 5′-AAGAGAATGAACGGCTCAAGC; control, 5′-ACUCUAUCUGCACGCUGAC. Cells were cultured on 6-well plates at 50–75% confluence, transfected with 20 nM siRNA mixed with G-Fectin (Genolution) for 48 hours, and then analyzed or treated with drugs.

Analysis of cell viability and apoptosis induction

Cells (5 × 103 cells/well) were cultured in 96-well plates overnight and treated with gamitrinib and Thap alone or in combination for 24 hours. To determine cell viability, cells were exposed to 3 (4,5-dimethyl-thyzoyl-2-yl)2,5 diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT), and crystalized formazan was quantified by measuring the absorbance at 595 nm with an Infinity M200 microplate reader (TECAN). Absorbance data were compared with that of vehicle control and expressed as percent viability. Alternatively, after treatment with drugs, DNA content (propidium iodide, red fluorescence) and caspase activation (DEVDase activity, green fluorescence) of the cells were analyzed using the CaspaTag in situ apoptosis detection kit (Millipore). Labeled cells were analyzed using the FACS Calibur™ system (BD Biosciences). Data were processed using FlowJo software (TreeStar).

CHOP reporter assay

To generate a CHOP reporter stable cell line, PC 3 cells were co-transfected with 8 μg of a promoter construct (CHOP::GFP) [50] obtained from Addgene (Addgene plasmid 21898) and 800 ng of puromycin linearized selection marker (Clontech) using Lipofectamin (Invitrogen) per manufacturer’s instructions. Transfected PC3 cells were cultured in RPMI (Lonza) with 1 μg/ml puromycin (Clontech) for 3 weeks and colonies were picked using cloning cylinders. GFP expression was monitored in the IncuCyte™ imaging system (Essen Bioscience) at an excitation wavelength of 450–490 nm and an emission of 500–530 nm, and analyzed by Image J software (National Institutes of Health).

Live cell imaging for intracellular calcium

HeLa cells were incubated with 5 μM Fura-2-AM for 30 min at 37°C and 5% CO2. After washing with Hank’s Buffer, the cells were incubated with calcium-free Locke’s solution (154 mM NaCl, 5.6 mM KCl, 3.2 mM MgCl2, 5 mM HEPES, 10 mM glucose, 0.2 mM EGTA; pH 7.4). Fluorescence changes were monitored every 5 minutes using an IX81 ZDC microscope (Olympus) at an emission wavelength of 510 nm with dual excitation at 340 nm and 380 nm. Images of the 340/380 fluorescence ratio were generated and analyzed by the Xcellence software package (Olympus).

Imaging D1ER and mtCameleon

Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) measurements were performed using an FV1000 laser confocal scanning microsope (Olympus) with a FRET module and a UPLSAPO 100× oil immersion objective with a 1.40 numerical aperture. HeLa cells were seeded on a Lab Tek II slide chamber at 40–80% confluency in DMEM (Lonza) supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% penicillin/streptomycin at 37°C and 5% CO2. D1ER or mtCameleon constructs (kind gifts from Dr. R.Y. Tsien, University of San Diego) [37] were transfected into HeLa cells using the Lipofectamine transfection reagent (Invitrogen) per manufacturer’s instructions. Cells were imaged at 24 or 48 hours after transfection. All analyses were performed under the same conditions. D1ER and mtCameleon, containing FRET donor (CFP) and acceptor (citrine) components, were excited with a 440-nm diode laser source; the emitted fluorescence bands were separated by a grating and detected by photomultiplier tubes in the CFP channel (480 nm) and FRET channel (535 nm). The FRET ratio (RFRET) was calculated as described previously [65] from confocal images using FV10-ASW 3.1 software (Olympus) by pixel-by-pixel quantification of fluorescence intensity: RFRET = IFRET/ICFP , where IFRET and ICFP represent the fluorescence intensities from the FRET and CFP channels, respectively. The FRET ratio (relative units) was plotted after comparing RFRET values.

RNA extraction and reverse transcript-PCR

Total RNA was prepared from cells suspended in cold PBS using the RNeasy mini kit (QIAGEN), and cDNA was synthesized using the ProtoScript® First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (New England Biolabs) using an oligo(dT) primer. The PCR reaction was performed in a Mastercycler PCR machine (Eppendorf) with the following sets of oligonucleotide primers: glyceraldehyde phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), 5′-CGGGAAGCTTGTCATCAATGG-3′ and 5′-GGCAGTGATGGCATGGACTG-3′; CHOP, 5′- CTTTCTCCTTCGGGACACTG-3′ and 5′-AGCCGTTCATTCTCTTCAGC-3′; TRAP1, 5′- ATGGCGCGCGAGCTGCGG-3′ and 5′-CAGTCGTCCTGCCTGCAA-3′; X-box binding protein 1 (XBP1), 5′-CCTTGTAGTTGAGAACCAGG-3′ and 5′-GGGGCTTGGTATATATGTGG-3′.

Xenograft tumor models

All experiments involving animals were approved by UNIST (IACUC-12-003-A). 22Rv1 (7 × 106) cells suspended in sterile PBS (200 μl) were injected subcutaneously into both flanks of 6-week-old BALB/c nu/nu male mice (Japan SLC Inc.) and allowed to grow to an average volume of approximately 100 mm3. Animals were randomly divided into four groups (two tumors/mouse, five mice/group). Gamitrinib or vehicle (DMSO) dissolved in 20% Cremophor EL (Sigma) in PBS was injected intraperitoneally, and Thap dissolved in 0.9% NaCl in PBS intravenously. The mice were administered 10 mg/kg gamitrinib and 0.2 mg/kg Thap twice a week. Tumors were measured daily with a caliper, and tumor volume was calculated using the formula: V = 1/2 × (width)2 × length. At the end of experiment, animals were euthanized, and organs including brain, heart, kidney, liver, lung, spleen, and tumor were collected for histology or western blotting. For histological analysis, harvested organs were fixed in 10% formalin and embedded in paraffin. Sections (5 μm) were placed on high-adhesive slides, stained with H&E, and scanned using the Dotslide system (Olympus) with 10× magnification. For western blot analysis, tissue samples were lysed in RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, and 0.25% N-deoxycholate) containing protease inhibitor and phosphatase inhibitor cocktails (Calbiochem) using a homogenizer (IKA).

Statistical analysis of data

All MTT experiments were duplicated and repeated independently at least three times. Statistical analyses were performed using the software program Prism 5.0 (GraphPad). In an unpaired t-test, p < 0.05 was considered significant.

Abbreviations

BAPTA: 

1,2-bis(o-aminophenoxy)ethane-N,N,N’,N’-tetraacetic acid acetoxymethyl ester

CHOP: 

CEBP homologous protein

CICR: 

Calcium induced calcium release

CsA: 

Cyclosporine A

Cyp-D: 

Cyclophilin D

ΔΨ m: 

Mitochondrial membrane potential

eIF2α: 

Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2α

ER: 

Ndoplasmic reticulum

FCCP: 

Carbonyl cyanide 4-(trifluoromethoxy) phenylhydrazone

Hsp90: 

Heat shock protein 90

IP3R: 

Inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptors

MOMP: 

Mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization

MTT: 

3(4,5-dimethyl-thyzoyl-2-yl)2,5 diphenyltetrazolium bromide

PTP: 

Permeability transition pore

17AAG: 

17-allylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin

RyR: 

Ryanodine receptor

Thap: 

Thapsigargin

TMRM: 

Tetramethylrhodamine methyl ester

TRAP1: 

Tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated protein 1

UPR: 

Unfolded protein response

XBP1: 

X-box binding protein 1.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. R.Y. Tsien (UCSD) for the mtCameleon and D1ER constructs, and UNIST-Olympus Biomedical imaging Center (UOBC) for technical support. H.K.P. was supported by a National Junior Research Fellowship from the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2011-0011833). This work was supported by the Basic Science Research and the Science Research Center Programs through the National Research Foundation of Korea (2010–0003586; 2010–0028684), the National R&D Program for Cancer Control through the Ministry for Health and Welfare (1020020), the Agenda program (PJ008969) through the Rural Development Administration of Korea, and the Bio-industry Technology Development program (311006-3) through the Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries of Korea.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Biological Sciences, School of Life Sciences, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology (UNIST)

References

  1. Taipale M, Jarosz DF, Lindquist S: HSP90 at the hub of protein homeostasis: emerging mechanistic insights. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2010, 11: 515-528. 10.1038/nrm2918View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Pearl LH, Prodromou C, Workman P: The Hsp90 molecular chaperone: an open and shut case for treatment. Biochem J. 2008, 410: 439-453. 10.1042/BJ20071640View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Trepel J, Mollapour M, Giaccone G, Neckers L: Targeting the dynamic HSP90 complex in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2010, 10: 537-549. 10.1038/nrc2887View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Siegelin MD, Dohi T, Raskett CM, Orlowski GM, Powers CM, Gilbert CA, Ross AH, Plescia J, Altieri DC: Exploiting the mitochondrial unfolded protein response for cancer therapy in mice and human cells. J Clin Invest. 2011, 121: 1349-1360. 10.1172/JCI44855PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Eletto D, Dersh D, Argon Y: GRP94 in ER quality control and stress responses. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2010, 21: 479-485. 10.1016/j.semcdb.2010.03.004PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen B, Piel WH, Gui L, Bruford E, Monteiro A: The HSP90 family of genes in the human genome: insights into their divergence and evolution. Genomics. 2005, 86: 627-637. 10.1016/j.ygeno.2005.08.012View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Kang BH, Plescia J, Dohi T, Rosa J, Doxsey SJ, Altieri DC: Regulation of tumor cell mitochondrial homeostasis by an organelle-specific Hsp90 chaperone network. Cell. 2007, 131: 257-270. 10.1016/j.cell.2007.08.028View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Leav I, Plescia J, Goel HL, Li J, Jiang Z, Cohen RJ, Languino LR, Altieri DC: Cytoprotective mitochondrial chaperone TRAP-1 as a novel molecular target in localized and metastatic prostate cancer. Am J Pathol. 2010, 176: 393-401. 10.2353/ajpath.2010.090521PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Coller HA, Grandori C, Tamayo P, Colbert T, Lander ES, Eisenman RN, Golub TR: Expression analysis with oligonucleotide microarrays reveals that MYC regulates genes involved in growth, cell cycle, signaling, and adhesion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000, 97: 3260-3265. 10.1073/pnas.97.7.3260PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Maddalena F, Sisinni L, Lettini G, Condelli V, Matassa DS, Piscazzi A, Amoroso MR, La Torre G, Esposito F, Landriscina M: Resistance to paclitxel in breast carcinoma cells requires a quality control of mitochondrial antiapoptotic proteins by TRAP1. Mol Oncol. 2013, 7: 895-906. 10.1016/j.molonc.2013.04.009View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Altieri DC, Stein GS, Lian JB, Languino LR: TRAP-1, the mitochondrial Hsp90. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2011, 1823: 767-773.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Caino MC, Chae YC, Vaira V, Ferrero S, Nosotti M, Martin NM, Weeraratna A, O’Connell M, Jernigan D, Fatatis A, Languino LR, Bosari S, Altieri DC: Metabolic stress regulates cytoskeletal dynamics and metastasis of cancer cells. J Clin Invest. 2013, 123: 2907-2920. 10.1172/JCI67841PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Chae YC, Angelin A, Lisanti S, Kossenkov AV, Speicher KD, Wang H, Powers JF, Tischler AS, Pacak K, Fliedner S, Michalek RD, Karoly ED, Wallace DC, Languino LR, Speicher DW, Altieri DC: Landscape of the mitochondrial Hsp90 metabolome in tumours. Nat Commun. 2013, 4: 2139-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Sciacovelli M, Guzzo G, Morello V, Frezza C, Zheng L, Nannini N, Calabrese F, Laudiero G, Esposito F, Landriscina M, Defilippi P, Bernardi P, Rasola A: The mitochondrial chaperone TRAP1 promotes neoplastic growth by inhibiting succinate dehydrogenase. Cell Metab. 2013, 17: 988-999. 10.1016/j.cmet.2013.04.019PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Yoshida S, Tsutsumi S, Muhlebach G, Sourbier C, Lee MJ, Lee S, Vartholomaiou E, Tatokoro M, Beebe K, Miyajima N, Mohney RP, Chen Y, Hasumi H, Xu W, Fukushima H, Nakamura K, Koga F, Kihara K, Trepel J, Picard D, Neckers L: Molecular chaperone TRAP1 regulates a metabolic switch between mitochondrial respiration and aerobic glycolysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013, 110: E1604-E1612. 10.1073/pnas.1220659110PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Chae YC, Caino MC, Lisanti S, Ghosh JC, Dohi T, Danial NN, Villanueva J, Ferrero S, Vaira V, Santambrogio L, Bosari S, Languino LR, Herlyn M, Altieri DC: Control of tumor bioenergetics and survival stress signaling by mitochondrial HSP90s. Cancer Cell. 2012, 22: 331-344. 10.1016/j.ccr.2012.07.015PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Montesano Gesualdi N, Chirico G, Pirozzi G, Costantino E, Landriscina M, Esposito F: Tumor necrosis factor-associated protein 1 (TRAP-1) protects cells from oxidative stress and apoptosis. Stress. 2007, 10: 342-350. 10.1080/10253890701314863View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Landriscina M, Laudiero G, Maddalena F, Amoroso MR, Piscazzi A, Cozzolino F, Monti M, Garbi C, Fersini A, Pucci P, Esposito F: Mitochondrial chaperone Trap1 and the calcium binding protein Sorcin interact and protect cells against apoptosis induced by antiblastic agents. Cancer Res. 2010, 70: 6577-6586. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-1256View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Kroemer G, Galluzzi L, Brenner C: Mitochondrial membrane permeabilization in cell death. Physiol Rev. 2007, 87: 99-163. 10.1152/physrev.00013.2006View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Baines CP, Kaiser RA, Purcell NH, Blair NS, Osinska H, Hambleton MA, Brunskill EW, Sayen MR, Gottlieb RA, Dorn GW, Robbins J, Molkentin JD: Loss of cyclophilin D reveals a critical role for mitochondrial permeability transition in cell death. Nature. 2005, 434: 658-662. 10.1038/nature03434View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Baines CP, Kaiser RA, Sheiko T, Craigen WJ, Molkentin JD: Voltage-dependent anion channels are dispensable for mitochondrial-dependent cell death. Nat Cell Biol. 2007, 9: 550-555. 10.1038/ncb1575PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Basso E, Fante L, Fowlkes J, Petronilli V, Forte MA, Bernardi P: Properties of the permeability transition pore in mitochondria devoid of Cyclophilin D. J Biol Chem. 2005, 280: 18558-18561. 10.1074/jbc.C500089200View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Kokoszka JE, Waymire KG, Levy SE, Sligh JE, Cai J, Jones DP, MacGregor GR, Wallace DC: The ADP/ATP translocator is not essential for the mitochondrial permeability transition pore. Nature. 2004, 427: 461-465. 10.1038/nature02229PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Nakagawa T, Shimizu S, Watanabe T, Yamaguchi O, Otsu K, Yamagata H, Inohara H, Kubo T, Tsujimoto Y: Cyclophilin D-dependent mitochondrial permeability transition regulates some necrotic but not apoptotic cell death. Nature. 2005, 434: 652-658. 10.1038/nature03317View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Bernardi P, von Stockum S: The permeability transition pore as a Ca(2+) release channel: new answers to an old question. Cell Calcium. 2012, 52: 22-27. 10.1016/j.ceca.2012.03.004PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Berridge MJ, Lipp P, Bootman MD: The versatility and universality of calcium signalling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2000, 1: 11-21. 10.1038/35036035View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Rizzuto R, Pozzan T: Microdomains of intracellular Ca2+: molecular determinants and functional consequences. Physiol Rev. 2006, 86: 369-408. 10.1152/physrev.00004.2005View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Pinton P, Giorgi C, Siviero R, Zecchini E, Rizzuto R: Calcium and apoptosis: ER-mitochondria Ca2+ transfer in the control of apoptosis. Oncogene. 2008, 27: 6407-6418. 10.1038/onc.2008.308PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Rizzuto R, Pinton P, Carrington W, Fay FS, Fogarty KE, Lifshitz LM, Tuft RA, Pozzan T: Close contacts with the endoplasmic reticulum as determinants of mitochondrial Ca2+ responses. Science. 1998, 280: 1763-1766. 10.1126/science.280.5370.1763View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Csordas G, Varnai P, Golenar T, Roy S, Purkins G, Schneider TG, Balla T, Hajnoczky G: Imaging interorganelle contacts and local calcium dynamics at the ER-mitochondrial interface. Mol Cell. 2010, 39: 121-132. 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.06.029PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Giacomello M, Drago I, Bortolozzi M, Scorzeto M, Gianelle A, Pizzo P, Pozzan T: Ca2+ hot spots on the mitochondrial surface are generated by Ca2+ mobilization from stores, but not by activation of store-operated Ca2+ channels. Mol Cell. 2010, 38: 280-290. 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.04.003View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Endo M: Calcium-induced calcium release in skeletal muscle. Physiol Rev. 2009, 89: 1153-1176. 10.1152/physrev.00040.2008View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Kang BH, Plescia J, Song HY, Meli M, Colombo G, Beebe K, Scroggins B, Neckers L, Altieri DC: Combinatorial drug design targeting multiple cancer signaling networks controlled by mitochondrial Hsp90. J Clin Invest. 2009, 119: 454-464. 10.1172/JCI37613PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Kang BH: TRAP1 regulation of mitochondrial life or death decision in cancer cells and mitochondria-targeted TRAP1 inhibitors. BMB Rep. 2012, 45: 1-6. 10.5483/BMBRep.2012.45.1.1View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Kang BH, Siegelin MD, Plescia J, Raskett CM, Garlick DS, Dohi T, Lian JB, Stein GS, Languino LR, Altieri DC: Preclinical characterization of mitochondria-targeted small molecule hsp90 inhibitors, gamitrinibs, in advanced prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2010, 16: 4779-4788. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-1818PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Ichas F, Jouaville LS, Mazat JP: Mitochondria are excitable organelles capable of generating and conveying electrical and calcium signals. Cell. 1997, 89: 1145-1153. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80301-3View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Palmer AE, Jin C, Reed JC, Tsien RY: Bcl-2-mediated alterations in endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ analyzed with an improved genetically encoded fluorescent sensor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004, 101: 17404-17409. 10.1073/pnas.0408030101PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Haynes CM, Ron D: The mitochondrial UPR - protecting organelle protein homeostasis. J Cell Sci. 2010, 123: 3849-3855. 10.1242/jcs.075119View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhao Q, Wang J, Levichkin IV, Stasinopoulos S, Ryan MT, Hoogenraad NJ: A mitochondrial specific stress response in mammalian cells. Embo J. 2002, 21: 4411-4419. 10.1093/emboj/cdf445PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Matassa DS, Amoroso MR, Agliarulo I, Maddalena F, Sisinni L, Paladino S, Romano S, Romano MF, Sagar V, Loreni F, Landriscina M, Esposito F: Translational control in the stress adaptive response of cancer cells: a novel role for the heat shock protein TRAP1. Cell Death Dis. 2013, 4: e851- 10.1038/cddis.2013.379PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Kim I, Xu W, Reed JC: Cell death and endoplasmic reticulum stress: disease relevance and therapeutic opportunities. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2008, 7: 1013-1030. 10.1038/nrd2755View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Zhang K, Kaufman RJ: From endoplasmic-reticulum stress to the inflammatory response. Nature. 2008, 454: 455-462. 10.1038/nature07203PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Tovey SC, de Smet P, Lipp P, Thomas D, Young KW, Missiaen L, De Smedt H, Parys JB, Berridge MJ, Thuring J, Holmes A, Bootman MD: Calcium puffs are generic InsP(3)-activated elementary calcium signals and are downregulated by prolonged hormonal stimulation to inhibit cellular calcium responses. J Cell Sci. 2001, 114: 3979-3989.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Fill M, Copello JA: Ryanodine receptor calcium release channels. Physiol Rev. 2002, 82: 893-922.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Querfurth HW, Haughey NJ, Greenway SC, Yacono PW, Golan DE, Geiger JD: Expression of ryanodine receptors in human embryonic kidney (HEK293) cells. Biochem J. 1998, 334 (Pt 1): 79-86.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Giannini G, Conti A, Mammarella S, Scrobogna M, Sorrentino V: The ryanodine receptor/calcium channel genes are widely and differentially expressed in murine brain and peripheral tissues. J Cell Biol. 1995, 128: 893-904. 10.1083/jcb.128.5.893View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Bennett DL, Cheek TR, Berridge MJ, De Smedt H, Parys JB, Missiaen L, Bootman MD: Expression and function of ryanodine receptors in nonexcitable cells. J Biol Chem. 1996, 271: 6356-6362. 10.1074/jbc.271.11.6356View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Yamaguchi H, Wang HG: CHOP is involved in endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced apoptosis by enhancing DR5 expression in human carcinoma cells. J Biol Chem. 2004, 279: 45495-45502. 10.1074/jbc.M406933200View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Hersey P, Zhang XD: How melanoma cells evade trail-induced apoptosis. Nat Rev Cancer. 2001, 1: 142-150. 10.1038/35101078View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Novoa I, Zeng H, Harding HP, Ron D: Feedback inhibition of the unfolded protein response by GADD34-mediated dephosphorylation of eIF2alpha. J Cell Biol. 2001, 153: 1011-1022. 10.1083/jcb.153.5.1011PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Gao JY, Song BR, Peng JJ, Lu YM: Correlation between mitochondrial TRAP-1 expression and lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2012, 18: 5965-5971. 10.3748/wjg.v18.i41.5965PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Aust S, Bachmayr-Heyda A, Pateisky P, Tong D, Darb-Esfahani S, Denkert C, Chekerov R, Sehouli J, Mahner S, Van Gorp T, Vergote I, Speiser P, Horvat R, Zeillinger R, Pils D: Role of TRAP1 and estrogen receptor alpha in patients with ovarian cancer -a study of the OVCAD consortium. Mol Cancer. 2012, 11: 69- 10.1186/1476-4598-11-69PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Sramkoski RM, Pretlow TG, Giaconia JM, Pretlow TP, Schwartz S, Sy MS, Marengo SR, Rhim JS, Zhang D, Jacobberger JW: A new human prostate carcinoma cell line, 22Rv1. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim. 1999, 35: 403-409.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Denmeade SR, Jakobsen CM, Janssen S, Khan SR, Garrett ES, Lilja H, Christensen SB, Isaacs JT: Prostate-specific antigen-activated thapsigargin prodrug as targeted therapy for prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003, 95: 990-1000. 10.1093/jnci/95.13.990View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Rasola A, Neckers L, Picard D: Mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation TRAP(1)ped in tumor cells. Trends Cell Biol. 2014,http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24731398,Google Scholar
  56. Yan C, Oh JS, Yoo SH, Lee JS, Yoon YG, Oh YJ, Jang MS, Lee SY, Yang J, Lee SH, Kim HY, Yoo YH: The targeted inhibition of mitochondrial Hsp90 overcomes the apoptosis resistance conferred by Bcl-2 in Hep3B cells via necroptosis. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2013, 266: 9-18. 10.1016/j.taap.2012.11.001View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. de Brito OM, Scorrano L: An intimate liaison: spatial organization of the endoplasmic reticulum-mitochondria relationship. Embo J. 2010, 29: 2715-2723. 10.1038/emboj.2010.177PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Jia J, Zhu F, Ma X, Cao Z, Li Y, Chen YZ: Mechanisms of drug combinations: interaction and network perspectives. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2009, 8: 111-128. 10.1038/nrd2683View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Kamb A, Wee S, Lengauer C: Why is cancer drug discovery so difficult?. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2007, 6: 115-120. 10.1038/nrd2155View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Keith CT, Borisy AA, Stockwell BR: Multicomponent therapeutics for networked systems. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2005, 4: 71-78. 10.1038/nrd1609View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Kitano H: A robustness-based approach to systems-oriented drug design. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2007, 6: 202-210. 10.1038/nrd2195View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Siegelin MD: Inhibition of the mitochondrial Hsp90 chaperone network: a novel, efficient treatment strategy for cancer?. Cancer Lett. 2013, 333: 133-146. 10.1016/j.canlet.2013.01.045View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Treiman M, Caspersen C, Christensen SB: A tool coming of age: thapsigargin as an inhibitor of sarco-endoplasmic reticulum Ca(2+)-ATPases. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 1998, 19: 131-135. 10.1016/S0165-6147(98)01184-5View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Banker G, Goslin K: Developments in neuronal cell culture. Nature. 1988, 336: 185-186. 10.1038/336185a0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Palmer AE, Tsien RY: Measuring calcium signaling using genetically targetable fluorescent indicators. Nat Protoc. 2006, 1: 1057-1065. 10.1038/nprot.2006.172View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Park et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement