Open Access

The MUC gene family: Their role in diagnosis and early detection of pancreatic cancer

Molecular Cancer20032:9

https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-4598-2-9

Received: 10 December 2002

Accepted: 7 January 2003

Published: 7 January 2003

Abstract

The early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer, as well as distinguishing between chronic pancreatitis and malignant pancreatic disease, remains still a clinical problem. Presently, there is no specific tumor marker for diagnosing pancreatic cancer. Mucin-associated marker like CA 19-9 are the most widely available pancreatic cancer tumor marker, but its value as a screening marker is limited by its reduced specificity.

Mucins (MUCs) are heavily glycosylated, high molecular weight glycoproteins with an aberrant expression profile in various malignancies.

This review considers briefly the potential use of the mucin expression pattern in diagnosis of pancreatic neoplasm. The overview will point out the present knowledge about changes in the mucin gene expression in pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanINs) as precursor lesions and in pancreatic adenocarcinoma, compared to normal pancreas and chronic pancreatitis and the potential role for differentiating chronic pancreatitis from pancreatic cancer.

Furthermore, the potential use of MUCs in the diagnosis and differentiation of intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasm's (IPMNs) will be discussed.

Keywords

pancreasmucinchronic pancreatitispancreatic cancerIPMNdiagnosis

Review

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is a neoplasm with a relatively high incidence and an extraordinarily poor prognosis [1]. In Western countries, it is the fifth leading cause of cancer deaths and has the lowest 5-year survival rate of any cancer [2]. Despite advances in diagnostic imaging, methods like endoscopic ultrasonography, dualphase spiral computer tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, early diagnosis and differentiation between malignant pancreatic tumors and chronic pancreatitis is still a diagnostic problem for clinicians [3].

The most commonly used clinical tests for tumor markers are serum-based immunoassays for blood group-related antigens and glycoproteins like CA 19-9, DUPAN2, CA 50, CA 125, and more recently CA 242. In pancreatic cancer, the sensitivity of the CA19-9 serum assay has been shown to range from 69% to 93%, and the specificity varied between 46% and 98% [4, 5]. Unfortunately, elevated levels of the CA 19-9 antigen were found in chronic pancreatitis and other cancer conditions [5, 6].

Antigens such as CA 19-9, CA 50, CA 125, and CA 242 contain oligosaccharide structures present on heavily glycosylated high molecular weight mucins [7]. These molecules are widely synthesized and expressed by epithelial cells of the gastrointestinal, respiratory, and genito-urinary tracts [8]. Mucins are synthesized either as membrane-bound or as secreted glycoproteins. The structure of epithelial mucins displays a protein backbone bearing numerous carbohydrate side chains. The structure of the apomucin backbone typically reveals the presence of Ser/Thr/Pro-rich regions containing tandemly repeated stretches of amino acids that constitute potential O-glycosylation sites [9].

So far 14 mucin genes have been described, eight are now well-characterized; these include MUC1-4, MUC5B, MUC5AC, MUC6 and MUC7 [810]. Two other mucins, MUC8 and MUC9 have also been described but their characterization is yet to be completed [11, 12]. Recently, partial cDNA sequences for MUC11 and MUC12 have been published [13]. Currently, MUC13 was identified as a cell surface mucin expressed by epithelial cells as well as hematopoietic cells [14]. MUC16 is the most recent member to the MUC protein family. It was characterized from a partial cDNA sequence encoding a mucin that has long been known as the ovarian cancer marker CA125 [15, 16].

Under normal circumstances, mucins are known to play a protective role for epithelial tissues. In addition, their involvement in the renewal and differentiation of the epithelium, modulation of cell adhesion, as well as cell signaling has also been proposed.

Alterations in the expression and in the structure of mucins have been reported in both pre-neoplastic and neoplastic lesions [17, 18]. However, there is a growing incidence that mucins and their associated blood group antigens may assist in the diagnosis of malignancies. In that regard, MUCs may represent potential diagnostic markers for early detection of pancreatic cancer and specific discrimination between pancreatic cancer and benign pancreatic diseases.

MUCs in normal pancreas

Various studies have analyzed the expression profiles of mucins in human pancreas under normal and pathological conditions using various methods with differences in their specificity and sensitivity including immunochemistry, in situ hybridization, RT-PCR and Northern blot. In general, immunochemical data obtained by using antibodies raised against the tandem repeat peptide should be analyzed with caution because the staining intensity may be caused by a changed mucin protein expression or by an altered glycosilation. Therefore, immunochemistry should be correlated with another method such as in situ hybridization. Despite the different analyzing methods the studies differ also in the inclusion or exclusion of MUCs.

Reports have shown the expression of MUC1 and MUC6 in normal adult pancreas tissue [1922]. Our recently published RT-PCR and Northern blot data support these data and demonstrate the absence of MUC2, MUC3A, MUC4, and MUC7 mRNA in normal pancreatic tissue [19]. There are contrary data about the detection of MUC5AC and MUC5B in normal pancreas [19, 22, 23]. MUC5B mRNA was detected in normal pancreas tissue as well as in normal duct cells by in situ hybridization [19, 23, 24]. Recently MUC5AC mRNA was found by the highly sensitive RT-PCR and slot blot analyses in normal pancreas tissue [19]. Studies using Northern blot analyses, in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry did not show any MUC5AC in pancreatic duct cells [22, 23].

However, normal pancreatic duct cells seem to express predominantly MUC1 and MUC6 [7, 37]. In general, MUC1 is a member of the membrane-bound mucins, whereas MUC6 is a secreted gel-forming mucin. MUC6 as a member of the group of mucins including MUC2, MUC5AC and MUC5B is located within the 11p15 chromosomal locus. In addition, no MUC2, MUC4, or MUC7 expression was detected in normal pancreas.

MUC molecules in PanINs and ductal adenocarcinoma

Approximately 80–90% of tumors of the exocrine pancreas are adenocarcinomas with ductal cell origin. However, a relationship between hyperplastic and dysplastic epithelial lesions of the pancreatic ducts and invasive ductal carcinoma are described for a long time. Therefore, similar to the adenoma-carcinoma sequence model for colon cancer development, the present ductal pancreatic cancer model is based on the concept of intraepithelial neoplasia and describes a series of lesions termed PanIN (pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia). Each grade of PanINs (PanIN-1A, PanIN-1B, PanIN-2 and PanIN-3) based on morphological criteria, cytological and architectural atypia [25]. This classification scheme with increasing neoplastic potential parallels with the stepwise prevalence of genetic alterations. Studies have shown, that characteristic genetic changes of the invasive ductal carcinoma such like p53 mutations and the loss DPC4/SMAD4 are a late event in the PanIN development whereas the overexpression of p21WAF1/CIP1 is an early event in the precursor lesions [26].

According to the studies about the occurrence of mutations and other genetic alterations in PanINs and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (DAC) there is an increasing knowledge about the expression of MUC mucins in DAC and the precursor lesions.

Studies have shown, that DACs and tumor cell lines commonly overexpress MUC1 mucin [7, 19, 22, 27]. This mucin was detected only at low levels in the most chronic pancreatitis and normal pancreas tissues on RNA level [19]. Recently, overexpression of MUC1 was observed in all stages of PanINs indicating the early occurrence of MUC1 in the development of DACs. Furthermore, published data indicate qualitative differences between the expression patterns showing cytoplasmatic and membrane-bound MUC1 in malignant pancreatic cancer cells [27]. In contrast, no cytoplasmatic staining was seen in normal tissue and chronic pancreatitis [27]. Pancreatic cancer cells are characterized by an aberrant glycosilation pattern. In this context, sialynated MUC1 was detected in DACs whereas it was not observed in specimens from normal pancreas, chronic pancreatitis or ductal hyperplasia [28].

The de novo expression of MUC4 in pancreatic adenocarcinoma and cell lines has been reported, a mucin that is usually undetectable in normal pancreas [19, 20, 23, 24]. Recently, we demonstrated the aberrant MUC4 mRNA expression in 75% (12/16) of the pancreatic adenocarcinoma and 73% (11/15) established pancreatic cancer cell lines [19]. There was no expression of MUC4 in normal pancreas (0/7) or in chronic pancreatitis tissues (0/10) [19]. This study introduces MUC4 as a tumor-associated mucin that was specific form pancreatic adenocarcinoma and that may serve as diagnostic marker to discriminate pancreatic adenocarcinoma from chronic pancreatitis. Recent published data about the MUC4 expression on protein level including samples from all PanIN grades and 25 invasive pancreatic adenocarcinoma detected MUC4 in all PanIN grades but with increasing percentage in PanIN-3 lesions (11/13) compared to PanIN-1 (5/30), PanIN-2 (10/28) [29]. 89% of the investigated DACs were MUC4 postive [29]. Interestingly, few nonneoplastic lesions including reactive ducts in chronic pancreatitis were immunoreactive. More comprehensive studies including the correlation of immunohistochemistry with other methods like in situ hybridization may be necessary to confirm these data.

Beside the expression of the full length precursor of MUC4 (sv0-MUC4) with the soluble glycoprotein subunit MUC4α and the transmembrane growth factor-like subunit MUC4β pancreatic cancer cells express MUC4 various splice variants [30, 31].

Another study corroborates the potential role of MUC4 as a diagnostic marker for pancreatic cancer. This pilot study demonstrate the presence of MUC4 mRNA in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of pancreatic cancer patients whereas it was undetectable in PBMCs of healthy volunteers or patients with pancreatitis or patients affected by other cancer types [32].

At this time, the biological function of human MUC4 in epithelial cells and malignant cells is poorly understood and remains under evaluation. In addition to its involvement in the covering of luminal epithelia, recent studies suggest that the overexpression of the MUC4 rat homologue sialomucin complex (SMC) disrupts integrin-mediated cell-matrix and cell-cell interaction and inhibits immune recognition [33]. The putative function of MUC4 as adhesion molecule was supported by the description of the new extracellular domain AMOP (adhesion-associated domain in MUC4 and other proteins) [34].

In a recent study, overexpression of MUC6 and the de novo expression of gastric secretory mucin MUC5AC in all stages of PanINs and in invasive DACs was described on RNA and protein level [22]. It suggests the early involvement of MUC6 and MUC5AC in the carcinogenesis of the DUCs. Additionally, a correlation between the MUC6 detection and the degree of differentiation of the infiltrating pancreatic adenocarcinoma detecting MUC6 predominantly in well-differentiated and less in moderately differentiated neoplasms was seen. Poorly differentiated tumors were only in 9% MUC6 positive.

In contrast to former published data indicating an aberrant expression of MUC3 in pancreatic cancer probes a recent study using RT-PCR and primer located in the non-repetitive MUC3A specific sequence did not reveal any MUC3 mRNA detection in normal pancreas, chronic pancreatitis nor pancreatic cancer tissue samples [19, 24, 35]. In contrast to the new study, former studies are based on data using repetitive-sequences. The authors suggest that the detection of MUC3A in previous studies is the result of cross-hybridization with the recently discovered mucins MUC11 and /or MUC12. MUC3A, MUC12 and the particular characterized MUC11 share sequence homologies. In support of this hypothesis MUC11 and MUC12 mRNA was found in all investigated pancreatic tissues [19].

Mucin gene expression in intraductal papillary-mucinous pancreatic neoplasia and related lesions

Intraductal papillary-mucinous pancreatic neoplasia (IPMN) also called Intraductal papillary-mucinous pancreatic tumors (IPMT) are a distinct and rare entity of pancreatic disease characterized by a proliferation of the epithelium lining the pancreatic ducts [36]. In contrast to the DACs IPMN have in general a better clinical prognosis and can be cured by surgery. Therefore, the correct diagnosis has an important clinical impact. Their relationship to the PanINs and DACs is still not well defined. IPMN may progress from adenomas stepwise to intraductal carcinomas and then to invasive carcinoma. However, molecular analyses demonstrate genetic alterations like the loss of DPC4 in distinct invasive forms of IPMNs, PanIN-3 as well as in DACs. Various studies demonstrate a dysregulation of mucins in IPMNs, which might contribute to the neoplastic progression. Studies revealed that IPMNs in general express MUC2, MUC5AC and mostly MUC4 whereas MUC1 is absent [3639]. This is in contrast to the invasive DACs, which are characterized by an overexpression of MUC1 and the absence of MUC2. However, recent data suggest a more heterogeneous profile of IPMNs with different mucin patterns and different clinical prognosis. It seems to be that there are at least three groups of IPMNs differing in their mucin expression. The largest group is MUC2 positive and MUC1 negative. A second group of IPMNs is MUC1 positive and MUC2 negative with an increased tendency for invasion and seems to be related to DAC. The third group with an oncocytic histology is characterized by a focal MUC1 and MUC2 expression [36]. IPMNs with a high expression of MUC2 and MUC5AC have a lower invasion and metastasising potential in comparison to DACs and therefore a better clinical outcome [3639]. In contrast, other data demonstrate that within the IPMNs MUC2 positive tumors have a higher incidence for malignant transformation and invasive behaviour than MUC2 negative tumors [38]. However, the authors point out that both groups of IPMNs have still a significant better clinical outcome than DACs.

Other rare neoplasms of the pancreas are the mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCNs). MNCs are unilocular or, more commonly, multilocular cysts lined by tall mucin producing cells. They affect almost woman and occur predominantly in the tail of the pancreas [40]. MCNs may be misdiagnosed as IPMNs or cystic forms of DACs. But in contrast to the most DACs non-invasive MCNs can be cured by surgery. A recent study has shown that non-invasive MCNs can be distinguished from IPMNs and DACs by the mucin profile that is characterized by expression of MUC5AC, whereas MUC2 expression is restricted to globlet cells [40]. Similar to DACs invasive forms of MCNs are MUC1 positive. In this regard, MUC1 expression in pancreatic lesions correlates with a more aggressive biological behaviour.

Conclusion

In summary, the early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer, as well as distinguishing between benign (chronic pancreatitis) and malignant pancreatic disease, remains difficult and may require multiple approaches including the imaging studies and tissue sampling. The analysis of the mucin expression pattern might be a promising tool to improve the correct diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. Several studies have shown that the mucin profile correlates with the growth behaviour and the prognosis of DACs, IPMNs and MCNs. In general, MUC1 expression is associated with a more aggressive biological behaviour. Therefore, mucins might be an important prognostic marker.

Despite, increasing knowledge about the mucin expression profile in normal pancreas, PanINs and DACs, chronic pancreatitis tissues were included only in few studies. However, the discrimination between pancreatic adenocarcinoma and chronic pancreatitis is still a pressing clinical problem. In this moment, MUC4 as a pancreas tumor-associated mucin seems to be a potential discrimination marker. But it has to be mentioned that despite the high frequency of MUC4 occurrence in pancreatic cancer a fraction is MUC4 negative.

The combined implementation of conventional imaging techniques and molecular diagnostic approaches including investigation of the mucin expression pattern may provide improved sensitivity and specificity of diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. Overall, further studies are necessary to confirm the clinical value of mucins in diagnosis of pancreatic diseases.

List of abbreviations used

MUC: 

mucin

RT-PCR: 

reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction

PBMC: 

peripheral blood mononuclear cell

PanIN: 

pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia

IPMT: 

intraductal papillary-mucinous tumors

IPMN: 

intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasia

DAC: 

ductal adenocarcinoma

MCN: 

moucinous cystic neoplasms

Declarations

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Jens Ringel for editing the manuscript.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Medicine II, Mannheim Medical Faculty, University of Heidelberg

References

  1. Rosewicz S, Wiedenmann B: Pancreatic carcinoma. Lancet. 1997, 349: 485-489. 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)05523-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Parker SL, Tong T, Bolden S, Wingo PA: Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 1997, 47: 5-27.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Adamek HE, Albert J, Breer H, Weitz M, Schilling D, Riemann JF: Pancreatic cancer detection with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a prospective controlled study. Lancet. 2000, 356: 190-193. 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02479-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Eskelinen M, Haglund U: Developments in serologic detection of human pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1999, 34: 833-844. 10.1080/003655299750025273.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Jalanko H, Kuusela P, Roberts P, Sipponen P, Haglund CA, Makela O: Comparison of a new tumour marker, CA 19-9, with alpha-fetoprotein and carcinoembryonic antigen in patients with upper gastrointestinal diseases. J Clin Pathol. 1984, 37: 218-222.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Kuusela P, Jalanko H, Roberts P, Sipponen P, Mecklin JP, Pitkanen R, Makela O: Comparison of CA 19-9 and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels in the serum of patients with colorectal diseases. Br J Cancer. 1984, 49: 135-139.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Kim YS, Gum JR, Crawley SC, Deng G, Ho JJ: Mucin gene and antigen expression in biliopancreatic carcinogenesis. Ann Oncol. 1999, 10 (Suppl 4): 51-55. 10.1023/A:1008332602541.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Gendler SJ, Spicer AP: Epithelial mucin genes. Annu Rev Physiol. 1995, 57: 607-634. 10.1146/annurev.physiol.57.1.607.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Moniaux N, Escande F, Porchet N, Aubert JP, Batra SK: Structural organization and classification of the human mucin genes. Front Biosci. 2001, 6: D1192-D1206.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Moniaux N, Nollet S, Porchet N, Degand P, Laine A, Aubert JP: Complete sequence of the human mucin MUC4: a putative cell membrane-associated mucin. Biochem J. 1999, 338 (Pt 2): 325-333. 10.1042/0264-6021:3380325.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Shankar V, Pichan P, Eddy RL, Tonk V, Nowak N, Sait SN, Shows TB, Schultz RE, Gotway G, Elkins RC, Gilmore MS, Sachdev GP: Chromosomal localization of a human mucin gene (MUC8) and cloning of the cDNA corresponding to the carboxy terminus. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 1997, 16: 232-241.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Lapensee L, Paquette Y, Bleau G: Allelic polymorphism and chromosomal localization of the human oviductin gene (MUC9). Fertil Steril. 1997, 68: 702-708. 10.1016/S0015-0282(97)00317-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Williams SJ, McGuckin MA, Gotley DC, Eyre HJ, Sutherland GR, Antalis TM: Two novel mucin genes down-regulated in colorectal cancer identified by differential display. Cancer Res. 1999, 59: 4083-4089.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Williams SJ, Wreschner DH, Tran M, Eyre HJ, Sutherland GR, McGuckin MA: Muc13, a novel human cell surface mucin expressed by epithelial and hemopoietic cells. J Biol Chem. 2001, 276: 18327-18336. 10.1074/jbc.M008850200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Yin BW, Dnistrian A, Lloyd KO: Ovarian cancer antigen CA125 is encoded by the MUC16 mucin gene. Int J Cancer. 2002, 98: 737-740. 10.1002/ijc.10250.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Yin BW, Lloyd KO: Molecular cloning of the CA125 ovarian cancer antigen: identification as a new mucin, MUC16. J Biol Chem. 2001, 276: 27371-27375. 10.1074/jbc.M103554200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Filipe MI: Mucins in the human gastrointestinal epithelium: a review. Invest Cell Pathol. 1979, 2: 195-216.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Filipe MI: Mucins and gastrointestinal malignancy. A new approach to the interpretation of biopsies. Acta Med Port. 1979, 1: 351-365.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Andrianifahanana M, Moniaux N, Schmied BM, Ringel J, Friess H, Hollingsworth MA, Büchler MW, Aubert JP, Batra SK: Mucin (MUC) gene expression in human pancreatic adenocarcinoma and chronic pancreatitis: a potential role of MUC4 as a tumor marker of diagnostic significance. Clin Cancer Res. 2001, 7: 4033-4040.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Hollingsworth MA, Strawhecker JM, Caffrey TC, Mack DR: Expression of MUC1, MUC2, MUC3 and MUC4 mucin mRNAs in human pancreatic and intestinal tumor cell lines. Int J Cancer. 1994, 57: 198-203.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Lan MS, Hollingsworth MA, Metzgar RS: Polypeptide core of a human pancreatic tumor mucin antigen. Cancer Res. 1990, 50: 2997-3001.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Kim GE, Bae HI, Park HU, Kuan SF, Crawley SC, Ho JJ, Kim YS: Aberrant expression of MUC5AC and MUC6 gastric mucins and sialyl Tn antigen in intraepithelial neoplasms of the pancreas. Gastroenterology. 2002, 123: 1052-1060. 10.1053/gast.2002.36018.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Balague C, Gambus G, Carrato C, Porchet N, Aubert JP, Kim YS, Real FX: Altered expression of MUC2, MUC4, and MUC5 mucin genes in pancreas tissues and cancer cell lines. Gastroenterology. 1994, 106: 1054-1061.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Balague C, Audie JP, Porchet N, Real FX: In situ hybridization shows distinct patterns of mucin gene expression in normal, benign, and malignant pancreas tissues. Gastroenterology. 1995, 109: 953-964.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Hruban RH, Adsay NV, Albores-Saavedra J, C Compton, Garrett ES, Goodman SN, Kern SE, Klimstra DS, Kloppel G, Longnecker DS, Luttges J, Offerhaus GJ: Pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia: a new nomenclature and classification system for pancreatic duct lesions. Am J Surg Pathol. 2001, 25: 579-586. 10.1097/00000478-200105000-00003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Biankin AV, Biankin SA, Kench JG, Morey AL, Lee CS, Head DR, Eckstein RP, Hugh TB, Henshall SM, Sutherland RL: Aberrant p16(INK4A) and DPC4/Smad4 expression in intraductal papillary mucinous tumours of the pancreas is associated with invasive ductal adenocarcinoma. Gut. 2002, 50: 861-868. 10.1136/gut.50.6.861.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Monges GM, Mathoulin-Portier MP, Acres RB, GF Houvenaeghel, Giovannini MF, Seitz JF, Bardou VJ, Payan MJ, Olive D: Differential MUC 1 expression in normal and neoplastic human pancreatic tissue. An immunohistochemical study of 60 samples. Am J Clin Pathol. 1999, 112: 635-640.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Masaki Y, Oka M, Ogura Y, Ueno T, Nishihara K, Tangoku A, Takahashi M, Yamamoto M, Irimura T: Sialylated MUC1 mucin expression in normal pancreas, benign pancreatic lesions, and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Hepatogastroenterology. 1999, 46: 2240-2245.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Swartz MJ, Batra SK, Varshney GC, Hollingsworth MA, Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Wilentz RE, Hruban RH, Argani P: MUC4 expression increases progressively in pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia. Am J Clin Pathol. 2002, 117: 791-796.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Choudhury A, Moniaux N, Winpenny JP, Hollingsworth MA, Aubert JP, Batra SK: Human MUC4 mucin cDNA and its variants in pancreatic carcinoma. J Biochem (Tokyo). 2000, 128: 233-243.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Choudhury A, Moniaux N, Ringel J, King J, Moore E, Aubert JP, Batra SK: Alternate splicing at the 3'-end of the human pancreatic tumor-associated mucin MUC4 cDNA. Teratog Carcinog Mutagen. 2001, 21: 83-96. 10.1002/1520-6866(2001)21:1<83::AID-TCM8>3.0.CO;2-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Ringel J, Faulmann G, Brandt R, Moniaux N, Tarantolo S, Joshi S, Löhr M, Batra SK: MUC4 mRNA in peripheral blood mononucleus cells (PBMC) as a potential tumor marker for pancreatic cancer [abstract]. Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res. 2001, 42: 616-Google Scholar
  33. Komatsu M, Tatum L, Altman NH, Carraway CA, Carraway KL: Potentiation of metastasis by cell surface sialomucin complex (rat MUC4), a multifunctional anti-adhesive glycoprotein. Int J Cancer. 2000, 87 (4): 480-486. 10.1002/1097-0215(20000815)87:4<480::AID-IJC4>3.0.CO;2-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Ciccarelli FD, Doerks T, Bork P: AMOP, a protein module alternatively spliced in cancer cells. Trends Biochem Sci. 2002, 27: 113-115. 10.1016/S0968-0004(01)02049-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Terada T, Ohta T, Sasaki M, Nakanuma Y, Kim YC: Expression of MUC apomucins in normal pancreas and pancreatic tumours. J Pathol. 1996, 180: 160-165. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(199610)180:2<160::AID-PATH625>3.0.CO;2-A.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Lüttges J, Zamboni G, Longnecker D, Klöppel G: The immunohistochemical mucin expression pattern distinguishes different types of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas and determines their relationship to mucinous noncystic carcinoma and ductal adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2001, 25: 942-948. 10.1097/00000478-200107000-00014.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Terris B, Dubois S, Buisine MP, Sauvanet A, Ruszniewski P, Aubert JP, Porchet N, Couvelard A, Degott C, Flejou JF: Mucin gene expression in intraductal papillary-mucinous pancreatic tumours and related lesions. J Pathol. 2002, 197: 632-637. 10.1002/path.1146.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Nakamura A, Horinouchi M, Goto M, Nagata K, Sakoda K, Takao S, Imai K, Kim YS, Sato E, Yonezawa S: New classification of pancreatic intraductal papillary-mucinous tumour by mucin expression: its relationship with potential for malignancy. J Pathol. 2002, 197: 201-210. 10.1002/path.1109.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Yonezawa S, Taira M, Osako M, Kubo M, Tanaka S, Sakoda K, Takao S, Aiko T, Yamamoto M, Irimura T, Kim YS, Sato E: MUC-1 mucin expression in invasive areas of intraductal papillary mucinous tumors of the pancreas. Pathol Int. 1998, 48: 319-322.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Lüttges J, Feyerabend B, Buchelt T, Pacena M, Klöppel G: The mucin profile of noninvasive and invasive mucinous cystic neoplasms of the pancreas. Am J Surg Pathol. 2002, 26: 466-471. 10.1097/00000478-200204000-00008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Ringel and Löhr; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2003

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.

Advertisement