Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Open Access

E-cadherin signal sequence disruption: a novel mechanism underlying hereditary cancer

  • 1, 2,
  • 1, 2, 3,
  • 4,
  • 5,
  • 1, 2,
  • 6,
  • 5 and
  • 1, 2, 3Email author
Contributed equally
Molecular Cancer201817:112

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12943-018-0859-0

  • Received: 18 May 2018
  • Accepted: 18 July 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

The aim of this study was to uncover the pathogenic relevance and the underlying molecular mechanism of a novel CDH1 variant found in a Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer family (p.L13_L15del), which affects the signal peptide of E-cadherin without changing the remaining predicted sequence. We verified that p.L13_L15del cells yield low levels of E-cadherin, decreased cell adhesion and enhanced cell invasion. Further, we demonstrated that the disruption of the highly conserved hydrophobic core of the signal peptide hampers the binding of cellular components crucial for E-cadherin translation and translocation into the endoplasmic reticulum, constituting a new molecular basis for the loss of a tumour suppressor gene causative of hereditary cancer.

Keywords

  • Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer
  • E-cadherin
  • CDH1
  • Germline variants
  • Signal peptide
  • Post-translational mechanism

Main text

To date, more than 155 loss-of-function CDH1 mutations have been described in Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer (HDGC) [1]. The most common alterations induce the occurrence of premature termination codons with an obvious deleterious effect [2].

The mature E-cadherin, encoded by the CDH1 gene, is a powerful adhesion molecule that contains a long extracellular domain responsible for the homophilic binding to cadherins presented on neighbouring cells, a transmembrane domain, and a cytoplasmic portion that supports the assembly of catenins and their anchorage to the cytoskeleton [3]. Importantly, before protein processing, the immature molecule also encompasses a short signal peptide and a precursor region preceding the extracellular domain [3]. Signal peptides serve as docking sites for the signal recognition particle (SRP), the main molecule responsible for detecting the translocation code of secretory and membrane proteins [4, 5].

Despite the remarkable biological function of the signal peptide, genetic changes occurring in this region are often ignored. The present study reports a novel CDH1 germline variant found in a HDGC family, which affects the signal peptide core of E-cadherin and maintains an intact mature protein.

Results and discussion

Description of the family

The heterozygous germline mutation c.38_46del, leading to the amino acid deletion p.L13_L15del, was identified by direct sequencing in a 33-year old woman from New Zealand (patient A). Histological examination of gastric specimens revealed that the proband was affected by signet ring cell (diffuse) carcinoma. One paternal aunt and a cousin were diagnosed with the same type of neoplasia and died at 40 and 30 years of age (Fig. 1a). The affected cousin, as well as patient A’s father were carriers of the same genetic alteration. Of note, this mutation was not found in the largest database of human genetic variation to date (gnomAD: The Genome Aggregation Database) comprising several thousand of unrelated individuals [6].
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Description and functional characterization of p.L13_L15del variant. a The pedigree of a New Zealand family carrying the p.L13_L15del mutation is represented. Symbols with a slash indicate deceased individuals. The proband is identified with the arrowhead. Cancer or other known diseases affecting family members were indicated. The actual age or the age at the time of death is displayed below each individual. TAR denotes thrombocytopenia-absent radius syndrome and MMR stands for mismatch repair. b Schematic representation of E-cadherin comprising the signal peptide, precursor, extracellular, transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains. Multiple sequence alignment of five signal peptide sequences is shown (hEcad, human E-cadherin; chEcad, chimpanzee E-cadherin; mEcad, mouse E-cadherin; xEcad, Xenopus E-cadherin; hPcad, human P-cadherin). Conserved residues are highlighted in black boxes, and residues conserved in at least four cadherins are shown in dark grey. c Total levels of E-cadherin were analyzed by Western Blot in CHO cells transfected with vectors encoding the E-cadherin mutant p.L13_L15del, the wild-type protein, and the empty vector (Mock). α-Tubulin was used as a loading control. Band intensity was quantified and normalized against wild-type cells. Intensity average + SE is represented in the graph. d Immunofluorescence was applied to evaluate protein localization. E-cadherin is shown in green and nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (blue). e Expression profiles of mutant (red) and wild-type cells (blue) were quantified. Average intensity in each internuclear position + SE is represented in the graph. Mean and SE of fluorescence intensity at the plasma membrane (internuclear position 50) is presented. f Invasive ability mean of wild-type and p.L13_L15del mutant cells. g Average area + SE of aggregates. h Cell-cell aggregation phenotypes of the different cell lines. Representative outlines of wild-type and mutant cellular aggregates are presented on the bottom. ** represents p ≤ 0.01, *** p ≤ 0.001 and **** p ≤ 0.0001

P.L13_L15del variant induces decreased total and membrane E-cadherin expression

To determine the pathogenicity of the L13_L15del CDH1 mutation, we first studied the conservation of the signal peptide. We performed a multiple sequence alignment of the E-cadherin amino acid sequence from different species and of P-cadherin, given the similarity of both cadherins with respect to their cell-to-cell adhesive function and epithelial expression [3]. Although most of the sequence is variable, the signal hydrophobic core is highly conserved across different cadherins (Fig. 1b). The p.L13_L15del mutation affects this specific region by removing three amino acids from the six that comprise the hydrophobic region, which suggests its possible functional relevance. Accordingly, PROVEAN software predicts a deleterious effect for this mutation with a score of − 6.102 (score ≤ − 2.5 is considered deleterious, Additional file 1: Table S1). A putative effect on the signal peptide cleavage was also tested and, while the predicted cleavage site of the wild-type and the variant sequences remains unchanged, the probability of the variant to generate a functional signal peptide is greatly decreased (Additional file 2: Figure S1). In addition, we could confirm p.L13_L15del mutation as “likely affecting signal peptide quality” through the inhibition of protein translocation to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane (min(∆C)= − 0.321 > min(∆S)= − 0.430) [7].

To assess the impact of the p.L13_L15del alteration in vitro, we transfected E-cadherin negative cells with vectors encoding the wild-type protein and the variant, as well as the empty vector, as a control (Additional file 3: Methods and Materials). Despite similar transfection efficiencies in all conditions, we verified that total protein levels were significantly reduced in the mutant cells, when compared with the wild-type expressing cells (Fig. 1c). An abnormal pattern of E-cadherin localization was also detected by immunofluorescence in most of the cells. In contrast to the strong membrane staining presented by the great majority of the wild-type cells, the p.L13_L15del cells displayed very low levels of E-cadherin at the membrane and, occasionally, aberrant cytoplasmic accumulation of the protein (Fig. 1d). Quantitative evaluation of the staining showed more intense E-cadherin in the wild-type cells when compared with those expressing the p.L13_L15del (Fig. 1e). This difference is also reflected in fluorescence intensity exhibited at the plasma membrane.

Taken together, these results indicate that the p.L13_L15del variant affects a conserved region of the E-cadherin signal peptide and impacts protein expression (the total level and the membrane fraction).

p.L13_L15del variant affects the adhesive and anti-invasive function of E-cadherin

To investigate the functional significance of p.L13_L15del variant, we tested cell invasive properties and cell-to-cell adhesiveness (Fig. 1f-h). In contrast to the transfection of wild-type E-cadherin, which significantly decreases the number of invasive cells, the variant is not able to efficiently suppress invasion through a matrigel matrix. Regarding adhesion, wild-type cells form large and compact aggregates with an average area of 20,277 pixels2, contrasting with p.L13_L15del expressing cells, which exhibit an isolated appearance with cellular structures of 5662 pixels2. Overall, our findings strongly support the pathogenic nature of the p.L13_L15del variant.

P.L13_L15del does not induce abnormal protein trafficking or premature degradation

Finally, we determined the molecular mechanism underlying the deleterious effects of p.L13_L15del at the signal peptide of E-cadherin. Possible alterations at the RNA level were first evaluated by real-time PCR. We verified that CDH1 mRNA levels were not significantly changed both in wild-type and in the variant conditions, despite the huge difference at the protein level (Fig. 2a). To exclude protein trafficking deregulation or premature degradation by quality control mechanisms, we treated the cells with DMSO chemical chaperone and MG132 proteasome inhibitor. Upon DMSO treatment, no effect was detected in either E-cadherin total expression, number of E-cadherin positive cells, or staining intensity of mutant cells (Fig. 2b-f). Proteasome inhibition induced a significant increase in p.L13_L15del protein levels and a slight increase in the number of cells expressing E-cadherin, as well as in the number of molecules present at the membrane. However, these increased levels were significantly different from those observed in the wild-type cells.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

p.L13_L15del variant does not affect E-cadherin trafficking or degradation. a CDH1 and 18S mRNA levels were analyzed by real-time PCR in CHO cells transfected with vectors encoding the E-cadherin mutant L13_L15del, the wild-type protein, and the empty vector (Mock condition). 18S was used as endogenous control. b Total levels of E-cadherin were analyzed in Mock, wild-type and L13_L15del mutant cells upon treatment with 2% DMSO and 10 μM MG132. α-Tubulin was used as a loading control. c Band intensity average + SE is presented. d Flow cytometry was used to assess surface E-cadherin in cells untreated and treated with DMSO or with the proteasome inhibitor MG132. e Graph representing the percentage of cells positive for E-cadherin. f For each sample, median fluorescence intensity + SE was determined and normalized for untreated wild-type cells. * represents p ≤ 0.05, ** p ≤ 0.01, *** p ≤ 0.001 and **** p ≤ 0.0001. g Scheme illustrating the interaction of a chemical chaperone with a newly synthesized polypeptide at the lumen of the endoplasmic reticulum. The chemical chaperone assists the folding of the protein and evades its quality control and degradation. At the cytoplasm, MG132 blocks the proteolytic activity of the 26S proteasome complex, resulting in accumulation of immature and unfolded proteins

With this set of experiments, we demonstrated that the deleterious effect of p.L13_L15del is not dependent on protein trafficking deregulation or on its early degradation.

P.L13_L15del hampers E-cadherin translation and processing

To test the involvement of post-translational machinery in the regulation of the p.L13_L15del mutant, we set up a cell-free system for in vitro protein translation (Fig. 3b). The approach allows coupled transcription and translation of a specific DNA sequence without the action of intermediate and regulatory cellular moieties. Vectors encoding the wild-type and the mutant CDH1 cDNAs were used as templates for the production of E-cadherin molecules. E-cadherin synthesis was subsequently detected by immunoblot and it was verified that the wild-type and the p.L13_L15del plasmids produce similar amounts of the protein, in contrast to the clear difference observed in the cell model system (Fig. 3c-g).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

The p.L13_L15del E-cadherin mutant is regulated by cellular post-translational mechanisms. a cDNA sequences of mutant plasmids inducing the deletion of one, two or three leucine residues. b Representative scheme of the cell-free system for in vitro protein translation. Constructs encoding the wild-type and the mutant CDH1 cDNAs were used as templates for the production of E-cadherin molecules. c Coupled transcription and translation of E-cadherin was detected by Western blotting. d Band intensity was quantified and normalized against wild-type plasmid. Intensity average + SE is represented in the graph. e Illustration of the cellular model: E-cadherin negative cells were transfected with plasmids encoding the wild-type and the sequential CDH1 mutants. f E-cadherin levels produced by cells transfected with the p.L15del, the p.L14_L15del and the p.L13_L15del mutants. α-Tubulin was used as a loading control. g Quantification of band intensity is showed in the graph. (h) Regulation mechanism of E-cadherin mutant p.L13_L15del. In a wild-type context, the binding of signal recognition particle (SRP) to the signal peptide sequence of the nascent polypeptide causes a temporary pause in translation. Subsequently, SRP-bound ribosome attaches to SRP receptor located at the membrane of the endoplasmic reticulum, enabling translation to continue and translocation to begin. SRP is released and SRP receptor is recycled. The newly synthesized protein undergoes folding and trafficking to its correct location at the plasma membrane. The presence of the p.L13_L15del mutation can, however, impair the binding of SRP and, consequently, induce an evident arrest of E-cadherin translation, which is associated with several deleterious cellular effects

To determine the impact of the specific leucine residues from the hydrophobic core in protein translation, a series of mutants was engineered. The sequential deletion of one, two or three leucine residues produces a decreasing effect on the quantity of E-cadherin molecules that are translated by the cells and that are exposed at the cell surface (Fig. 3f-g and Additional file 4: Figure S2). Concordant results were obtained by in silico analysis of these mutants, where the p.L13_L15del always displayed stronger deleterious effect than the p.L14_L15del, and the p.L15del behaved as a nearly neutral variant (Additional file 1: Table S1). Remarkably, in the cell-free system, no decreasing effects were observed in protein levels of any of the mutants when compared with the wild-type condition. These findings demonstrated that p.L13_L15del impairs the interaction of E-cadherin with post-translational machinery, decreasing protein synthesis, ER import and membrane activity. Further, we verified that the impairment of protein translation is dependent on the extension of the signal peptide core disruption.

Interestingly, two different germline mutations affecting the signal peptide core and which do not induce truncated CDH1 forms were previously identified in diffuse gastric cancer cases: c.44_46del (p.L15del) and c.46insTGC (p.L15dup) [810]. Taking into account our results, both mutations are unlikely to cause HDGC. In fact, we demonstrated that p.L15del does not affect the function of the signal peptide, and in the case of p.L15dup, the integrity of the signal peptide core is preserved, which is indicative of normal translation and translocation into the ER.

In summary, this is the first description that the CDH1 signal peptide core is essential for E-cadherin synthesis and delivery. The failure in this checkpoint leads to loss of protein expression and function, and ultimately to disease.

Notes

Abbreviations

DMSO: 

Dimethyl sulfoxide

ER: 

Endoplasmic reticulum

HDGC: 

Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer

SRP: 

Signal recognition particle

Declarations

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge Dr. Victoria Beshay from the Peter MacCallum Cancer Center (Melbourne, Australia) for DNA sequencing.

Funding

This work was financed by FEDER funds through the Operational Programme for Competitiveness Factors (COMPETE), Programa Operacional Regional do Norte (Norte 2020) and by National Funds through the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT), under the projects PTDC/BIM-ONC/0171/2012, PTDC/BIM-ONC/0281/2014, PTDC/BBB-IMG/0283/2014, NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000029; Post-Doctoral grant SFRH/BPD/87705/2012-JF and Doctoral grant SFRH/BD/108009/2015-SM. We acknowledge the American Association of Patients with Hereditary Gastric Cancer “No Stomach for Cancer” for funding Seruca and Figueiredo research.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article [and its Additional files].

Authors’ contributions

JF was responsible for the design of the experimental system, analysis and interpretation of data, and wrote the article. SM performed the in vitro experiments, acquired and analysed the data. KG, TG and SS acquired, analysed and interpreted the data. JMS analyzed the data and contributed to the workflow of the project. RS and PG were responsible for the conception of the study, interpretation of data, and critical review of the manuscript. All authors approved the final version of manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Biopsy samples were collected from the Pathology Department at North Shore Hospital, Auckland, and informed consent was obtained from the affected family members.

Consent for publication

We have obtained consent to publish this paper from the participants of this study.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde (i3S), Porto, Portugal
(2)
Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of the University of Porto (IPATIMUP), Porto, Portugal
(3)
Medical Faculty of the University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
(4)
Genetic Health Service NZ, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
(5)
Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Centre for Translational Cancer Research (Te Aho Matatū), Department of Biochemistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
(6)
Institute for Systems and Robotics (ISR/IST), LARSyS, Bioengineering Department, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal

References

  1. van der Post RS, Vogelaar IP, Carneiro F, Guilford P, Huntsman D, Hoogerbrugge N, Caldas C, Schreiber KE, Hardwick RH, Ausems MG, et al. Hereditary diffuse gastric cancer: updated clinical guidelines with an emphasis on germline CDH1 mutation carriers. J Med Genet. 2015;52:361–74.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Oliveira C, Pinheiro H, Figueiredo J, Seruca R, Carneiro F. Familial gastric cancer: genetic susceptibility, pathology, and implications for management. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:e60–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Paredes J, Figueiredo J, Albergaria A, Oliveira P, Carvalho J, Ribeiro AS, Caldeira J, Costa AM, Simoes-Correia J, Oliveira MJ, et al. Epithelial E- and P-cadherins: role and clinical significance in cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1826;2012:297–311.Google Scholar
  4. Halic M, Becker T, Pool MR, Spahn CM, Grassucci RA, Frank J, Beckmann R. Structure of the signal recognition particle interacting with the elongation-arrested ribosome. Nature. 2004;427:808–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Janda CY, Li J, Oubridge C, Hernandez H, Robinson CV, Nagai K. Recognition of a signal peptide by the signal recognition particle. Nature. 2010;465:507–10.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Lek M, Karczewski KJ, Minikel EV, Samocha KE, Banks E, Fennell T, O'Donnell-Luria AH, Ware JS, Hill AJ, Cummings BB, et al. Analysis of protein-coding genetic variation in 60,706 humans. Nature. 2016;536:285–91.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Hon LS, Zhang Y, Kaminker JS, Zhang Z. Computational prediction of the functional effects of amino acid substitutions in signal peptides using a model-based approach. Hum Mutat. 2009;30:99–106.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen QH, Deng W, Li XW, Liu XF, Wang JM, Wang LF, Xiao N, He Q, Wang YP, Fan YM. Novel CDH1 germline mutations identified in Chinese gastric cancer patients. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19:909–16.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Guilford P, Humar B, Blair V. Hereditary diffuse gastric cancer: translation of CDH1 germline mutations into clinical practice. Gastric Cancer. 2010;13:1–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Hansford S, Kaurah P, Li-Chang H, Woo M, Senz J, Pinheiro H, Schrader KA, Schaeffer DF, Shumansky K, Zogopoulos G, et al. Hereditary diffuse gastric Cancer syndrome: CDH1 mutations and beyond. JAMA Oncol. 2015;1:23–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

Advertisement