Comprehensive landscape and future perspectives of circular RNAs in colorectal cancer
Molecular Cancer volume 20, Article number: 26 (2021)
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a common hereditary tumor that is often fatal. Its pathogenesis involves multiple genes, including circular RNAs (circRNAs). Notably, circRNAs constitute a new class of noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) with a covalently closed loop structure and have been characterized as stable, conserved molecules that are abundantly expressed in tissue/development-specific patterns in eukaryotes. Based on accumulating evidence, circRNAs are aberrantly expressed in CRC tissues, cells, exosomes, and blood from patients with CRC. Moreover, numerous circRNAs have been identified as either oncogenes or tumor suppressors that mediate tumorigenesis, metastasis and chemoradiation resistance in CRC. Although the regulatory mechanisms of circRNA biogenesis and functions remain fairly elusive, interesting results have been obtained in studies investigating CRC. In particular, the expression of circRNAs in CRC is comprehensively modulated by multiple factors, such as splicing factors, transcription factors, specific enzymes and cis-acting elements. More importantly, circRNAs exert pivotal effects on CRC through various mechanisms, including acting as miRNA sponges or decoys, interacting with RNA binding proteins, and even translating functional peptides. Finally, circRNAs may serve as promising diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers and potential therapeutic targets in the clinical practice of CRC. In this review, we discuss the dysregulation, functions and clinical significance of circRNAs in CRC and further discuss the molecular mechanisms by which circRNAs exert their functions and how their expression is regulated. Based on this review, we hope to reveal the functions of circRNAs in the initiation and progression of cancer and highlight the future perspectives on strategies targeting circRNAs in cancer research.
Currently, colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common malignancy and the second leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide . Moreover, the incidence and mortality rates of CRC are still rapidly increasing in many developing countries, and the public health burden of CRC is expected to increase by 60% in 2030, with more than 2.2 million new cases diagnosed and 1.1 million deaths . Following the implementation of early screening and progress in standardized treatments, the prognosis of patients with CRC has significantly improved, with 5-year survival rates of early-stage patients approaching 90% . However, most patients with CRC are diagnosed at advanced stages due to the lack of distinctively incipient symptoms and the limitations of early detection and screening. The prognosis of these patients is still poor, particularly in patients with late-stage disease and distant metastasis, whose 5-year survival rate is only 13.1% . To further prolong the survival time and improve the quality of life of patients with CRC, studies aiming to elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying the occurrence and development of CRC and to identify new biomarkers for the early diagnosis and prediction and novel targets for the effective prevention and treatment of CRC recurrence and metastasis are important and urgently needed.
Circular RNAs (circRNAs) objectively exist in organisms (Fig. 1). As early as 1976, Sanger et al. first discovered single-stranded circRNA molecules in viroids, although they are not produced by a backsplicing mechanism . Initially, circRNAs were mainly considered ‘byproducts’ or ‘junk’ generated by abnormal splicing events, and only a rare few circRNAs (e.g., circSRY, circDCC and circEST1) were thought to have possible functions [5, 6]. In recent years, high-throughput RNA sequencing (RNA-seq), circRNA-specific microarrays and bioinformatics analyses have identified thousands of circRNAs in eukaryotes such as fungi, protists, plants, worms, insects, fish and mammals [7,8,9] and revealed their cell-, tissue-, and timing-specific expression patterns [10, 11]. Moreover, numerous studies have confirmed that circRNAs perform regulatory functions in tissue development (e.g., neurogenesis and myogenesis) [12,13,14,15], organism aging [16, 17], and the incidence of diseases, such as tumors, neurological disorders, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular diseases and chronic inflammatory diseases [18, 19]. Although circRNAs have been less well characterized in other human diseases, most studies have focused on the role of circRNAs in cancers (e.g., CRC, hepatocellular carcinoma, gastric cancer, glioma, etc.) and reported functions in tumorigenesis and metastasis in which individual circRNAs have been identified as either oncogenes or tumor suppressors [20, 21].
Studies investigating circRNAs in CRC rapidly accumulated after 2018. We identified nearly 200 papers by using the terms “circRNAs and colorectal cancer” while searching PubMed and Web of Science, sought out similar articles in PubMed, and checked the cited literature in the references until August 2020. This comprehensive review summarizes recent progress in our understanding of the dysregulation, functions and clinical implications of circRNAs in CRC and discusses the upstream mechanisms of circRNA biogenesis and downstream mechanisms of circRNA functions. In particular, we highlight the future perspectives of circular RNAs in cancer to lay a foundation and identify directions for further research on circRNAs.
Overview of circRNAs
Biogenesis and degradation of circRNAs
Most circRNAs are derived from known protein-coding genes with highly active promoters and consist of a single exon or multiple exons [22, 23]. CircRNAs generally have long introns flanking the exons and are mainly generated by backsplicing, which differs from the canonical linear splicing mechanism . During backsplicing, a downstream splice-donor (SD) site is covalently linked to an upstream splice-acceptor (SA) site, resulting in the formation of exonic circRNAs (EcircRNAs) or exon-intron circRNAs (EIcircRNAs). Additionally, circRNAs are produced from lariat precursors when the lariats undergo internal backsplicing [25, 26]. The lariat precursors are usually created by exon-skipping, which is an event during which alternative exons are spliced out of the final mRNA products and contained within the excised lariats during linear splicing . Finally, intronic lariat precursors that escape the debranching step of canonical linear splicing lead yield so-called circular intronic RNAs (CiRNAs) . Although these hypotheses have been widely accepted, the underlying mechanisms of circRNA biogenesis remain fairly elusive.
Following biogenesis, most circRNAs, except for intron-containing circRNAs, are transported from the nucleus to the cytoplasm by the ATP-dependent RNA helicase DDX39A (also known as URH49) and spliceosome RNA helicase DDX39B (also known as UAP56) in a size-dependent manner . CircRNAs exhibit an exceptionally high stability, which is presumably attributed to their covalently closed ring structure, which protects these molecules from exonuclease-mediated degradation [12, 22]. The mechanisms underlying their degradation have only recently begun to be elucidated. Preliminary data show that the RNase P-MRP complex , RNase L , and the Argonaute 2 (AGO2) protein [31, 32] may participate in the cleavage of specific circRNAs under specific circumstances. For example, circRNAs containing the RNA modification N6-methyladenosine (m6A) are subject to endoribo-nucleolytic cleavage by the RNase P-MRP1 complex in a manner depending on YTHDF2 and HRSP12 . In addition, some circRNAs (e.g., ciRS-7, ciRS-122 and circHIPK3) are actively exported to the extracellular space in exosomes, which may be a possible mechanism by which cells clear redundant circRNAs [33,34,35,36,37]. More importantly, ciRS-7 and ciRS-122 retain their circular structure in exosomes and function upon release into recipient cells, indicating that exosomal circRNAs may also play a role in intercellular communication [36, 37].
Classification and functions of circRNAs
According to their biogenesis mechanisms, circRNAs are usually classified into the following three categories: EcircRNAs in which the internal intron is spliced out; EIcircRNAs, namely, circRNAs that contain sequences derived from both exons and introns ; and CiRNAs, which contain sequences originating exclusively from introns . EcircRNAs account for most circRNAs and are generally localized to the cytoplasm despite the lack of a cap and poly (A) tail [7, 12, 39]. EcircRNAs mainly function by interacting with microRNAs (miRNAs) or RBPs [12, 23, 24]. In contrast, EIcircRNAs and CiRNAs predominantly reside in the nucleus and possess fewer miRNA binding sites than EcircRNAs [27, 38]. Functionally, EIcircRNAs (e.g., circEIF3J and circPAIP2) promote the transcription of their host genes by interacting with the U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein (snRNP) , while CiRNAs (e.g., ci-ankrd52) exert a positive regulatory effect on the noncoding transcripts of their parental genes by regulating RNA polymerase II-mediated transcription . Similar to long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) , circRNAs have also been divided into five types, namely, exonic, intronic, sense overlapping, antisense, and intergenic, based on their position in the genome relative to the protein-coding genes . The proportions of these five types vary from species to cells, and different types perform various functions.
To date, numerous studies have revealed the broad expression of endogenous circRNAs in all human tissues, and circRNAs have increasingly been implicated in the regulation of neuronal functions, cell proliferation and transformation and innate immunity through various molecular mechanisms . For example, hsa_circ_0001946, also known as ciRS-7 or CDR1as, is perhaps the most well-characterized circRNA and has been shown to regulate neuronal development [12, 13, 32, 43], insulin secretion [44, 45] and tumorigenesis [46, 47] by sponging or decoying miR-7 and miR-7-independent mechanisms. Importantly, hsa_circ_0000284 (circHIPK3) promotes insulin secretion and improves β cell function by sponging mir-124-3p and mir-338-3p in individuals with diabetes mellitus ; hsa_circ_0000284 also plays dual regulatory roles in the growth and aggressiveness of cancer by sequestering multiple miRNAs [48,49,50,51]. However, the proposed biological functions and mechanisms of action of only a minor fraction of the circRNAs identified to date have been determined, and most circRNAs still require further studies.
CircRNAs and CRC
Aberrant expression of circRNAs in CRC
RNA-seq and circRNA-specific microarrays are the most commonly used methods for genome-wide profiling of circRNAs, and thousands of circRNAs have been identified in CRC tissues, cells, exosomes, and blood from patients with CRC (Additional file 1) [52, 53]. Subsequently, by comparing the expression levels between cancer and normal groups, hundreds of differentially expressed circRNAs (DECs) have been selected according to the fold change, p-value or fluorescence value (Additional file 1).
Dysregulated circRNAs in CRC tissues
Tian et al. applied a microarray containing 162,351 human circRNA probes to screen the expression profiles of circRNAs in 4 matched CRC tissues and adjacent normal tissues . Based on the filter criteria of |FC| ≥ 2, P < 0.05, and fluorescence intensity ≥100, 13,198 DECs were identified, including 6697 upregulated and 6501 downregulated DECs . Zhou et al. performed RNA-seq to profile mRNA and circRNA expression in 8 pairs of CRC tissues and their adjacent nontumor tissue samples; 31,557 circRNAs were detected in the screening. Of these circRNAs, 81% were derived from protein-coding exons, 5% were derived from intronic sequences, and 14% were derived from other sequences . Consistent with these findings, Tian et al. identified 265 DECs and thousands of lncRNAs and mRNAs using a microarray assay; among the dysregulated circRNAs, 75.85% were exonic circRNAs, 11.32% were intronic circRNAs, 7.92% were sense overlapping circRNAs, 3.4% were antisense circRNAs, and 1.51% were intergenic circRNAs . Based on the RNA-seq data and differential expression analysis of 20 paired frozen tissues, Ju et al. identified 103 abnormally expressed circRNAs (48 upregulated and 55 downregulated) between recurrent and nonrecurrent tumor tissues . In addition, Xu et al. detected 66,855 circRNAs in tissue samples from three patients with CRC and liver metastases and three matched patients with CRC using secondary sequencing; 113 of these circRNAs were DECs, and 92 upregulated and 21 downregulated DECs were identified . Zeng et al. also detected 431 DECs (192 upregulated and 239 downregulated) in CRC tissues from patients with lung metastasis compared with CRC tissues from patients without metastasis using a high-throughput microarray assay . Interestingly, Yuan et al. and Chen et al. searched for tumorigenesis- and metastasis-associated circRNAs in CRC mouse models using RNA-seq; finally, mmu-circ-001226/mmu-circ-000287 and circ-NSD2 (mm9_circ_003195) were identified to be associated with CRC tumorigenesis and metastasis, respectively [59, 60].
Dysregulated circRNAs in CRC cells
Jin et al. used high-throughput RNA-seq to analyze circRNA expression profiles in the normal colon epithelial cell line FHC and seven CRC cell lines (LoVo, SW480, HCT116, SW620, HT29, HCT8, and DLD1) and identified 112 DECs between the FHC cell line and CRC cell lines using the following selection criteria: P < 0.01 and |Log2FC| ≥1 . Using RNA-seq and a differential expression analysis, Jiang et al. investigated the circRNA profiles in two CRC cell lines (the primary tumor cell line SW480 and its metastatic cell line SW620) and identified a large set of 2919 circRNAs with significantly differential expression patterns compared to normal cells (NCM460) . In addition, the authors identified a set of 623 DECs that differed between the SW480 and SW620 cell lines . In particular, a microarray analysis of circRNA expression profiles in CRC cells (HCT116) identified several DECs associated with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemoradiation resistance [63, 64]. More interestingly, Dou et al. observed a significant global downregulation of circRNAs in KRAS mutant colon cancer cells (e.g., DLD-1, DKO-1, and HCT116 cells) compared to KRAS wild-type cells (e.g., DKs-8 and HKe3 cells), indicating a broad effect of mutant KRAS on circRNA abundance .
Dysregulated circRNAs in blood from patients with CRC
Ye et al. performed a circRNA microarray analysis using 8 plasma samples, including four samples from patients with CRC and four samples from healthy controls, and detected 204 DECs between the CRC and normal plasma samples; among these DECs, 178 were upregulated and 26 were downregulated in plasma from patients with CRC . These circRNAs, including hsa_circ_0082182, hsa_circ_0000370, and hsa_circ_0035445, may play a role in the pathogenesis of CRC and might be potential noninvasive biomarkers for the detection of CRC.
Dysregulated circRNAs in CRC exosomes
Exosomes are extracellular vesicles or microvesicles secreted by various cells that display differential expression of exosome markers, such as TSG101, HSP70, CD9, and CD63, but do not express albumin or calnexin [37, 66, 67]. Usually, exosomes are translucent cup-shaped or spherical structures in transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images with diameters ranging from 30 to 150 nm [68, 69]. In recent years, exosomes have been reported to be carriers delivering miRNAs, lncRNAs, proteins and even circRNAs for intercellular signal transduction [68,69,70]. Dou et al. detected circRNAs in secreted exosomes from three colon cancer cell lines (DLD-1, DKO-1, and DKs-8), and circRNAs were more abundant in extracellular vesicles than in cells . By conducting an RNA-seq analysis of 50 CRC and 50 healthy control serum exosome samples, Xie et al. identified 1924 CRC-related circRNAs . These circRNAs were widely distributed across all chromosomes and included 33.2% intronic circRNAs, 31.6% exonic circRNAs, 18.3% antisense circRNAs, and 16.9% circRNAs from other sources . According to the statistical criteria of |FC| ≥2.0 and P ≤ 0.05, 122 DECs, including 100 upregulated and 22 downregulated circRNAs, were selected . Feng et al. also identified 3864 significantly dysregulated exosomal circRNAs in plasma from patients with CRC, of which 1889 circRNAs were upregulated and 1975 circRNAs were downregulated . Interestingly, Hon et al. performed a circRNA microarray using exosomal RNAs from HCT116-resistant and HCT116-parental cells and identified 105 significantly upregulated and 34 downregulated circRNAs in HCT116-resistant exosomes . These circRNAs might be potential liquid biopsy indicators for the diagnosis of CRC and may play regulatory roles in the initiation (e.g., circPNN), progression (e.g., circIFT80) or chemoresistance (e.g., circ_0000338) of CRC.
Biological functions of circRNAs in CRC
Based on validation experiments such as Northern blot, reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR), or droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) analyses, many key circRNAs have been confirmed to be significantly dysregulated in CRC tissues, cells, blood, and exosomes (Fig. 2). Among these circRNAs, most circRNAs, including hsa_circ_0014717 , circHIPK3 , hsa_circ_0009361 , etc., exhibit the same expression patten in CRC tissues and cells. Some circRNAs are aberrantly expressed in both tissues and blood from CRC patients as exemplified by circCAMSAP1 . In particular, circVAPA is upregulated in CRC tissues and cells and plasma from patients with CRC [74, 75]; circIFT80 is significantly upregulated in CRC tissues, cell lines, and serum exosomes compared with normal controls . Inexplicably, the level of circABCC1 was increased in CRC tissues and exosomes  but decreased in plasma from patients with CRC . More importantly, over 100 hub circRNAs have been shown to participate in the tumorigenesis, metastasis or chemoradiation resistance of CRC based on the results of in vitro and in vivo functional experiments (Fig. 3, Additional file 2).
Generally, upregulated circRNAs function as oncogenes in CRC and promote cell proliferation, migration and invasion but inhibit cell cycle arrest and apoptosis (Fig. 3a, b and d; Additional file 2). For instance, hsa_circ_0005075 promotes tumor progression by increasing the proliferation, migration, and invasion of CRC cells [78, 79]; the knockdown of hsa_circ_0000284 (circHIPK3) markedly suppresses CRC cell proliferation, migration, and invasion, induces apoptosis in vitro and inhibits CRC growth and metastasis in vivo [50, 51]. Moreover, some circRNAs modulate fatty acid β-oxidation or glycolysis in CRC cells, resulting in profound changes in cellular lipid storage and increased cell growth [75, 80,81,82,83,84] (Fig. 3f, Additional file 2). These functions are exemplified by hsa_circ_0000759 (circACC1), which is a circular RNA implicated in lipid metabolism that promotes glycolysis and fatty acid oxidation in HCT116 cells . Consistent with the observed metabolic changes, the silencing or forced expression of circACC1 results in the inhibition and promotion of CRC growth, respectively . Furthermore, several circRNAs promote the self-renewal of colorectal cancer stem cells (CSCs)  or tumor-initiating cells (TICs)  and contribute to cell stemness, sphere formation, and metastasis  (Fig. 3e; Additional file 2). For example, hsa_circ_02276 (circLgr4) was identified as a circRNA expressed at high levels in colorectal tumors and colorectal CSCs; circLgr4 knockdown inhibits colorectal CSC self-renewal, colorectal tumorigenesis and invasion, while circLgr4 overexpression exerted the opposite effects . Finally, certain circRNAs promote angiogenesis in CRC, which is a key event maintaining tumor cell survival and aggressiveness [87, 88] (Fig. 3d; Additional file 2). According to Chen et al., circ-001971 relieved the miR-29c-3p-induced inhibition of VEGFA, which is among the most important tumor cell-secreted proangiogenic factors, thereby increasing the proliferation, invasion and angiogenesis of CRC .
Downregulated circRNAs typically function as tumor suppressors in CRC that suppress cell proliferation, migration and invasion while inducing cell cycle arrest and apoptosis (Fig. 3a, b and d; Additional file 2). For example, ectopic hsa_circ_0026782 (circITGA7) expression inhibits the growth and metastasis of CRC cells in vitro and in vivo, whereas the knockdown of circITGA7 promotes the proliferation and migration of CRC cells in vitro and increases CRC growth in vivo [89, 90]. Moreover, hsa_circ_0008285 (circCDYL) decreases cell viability, impairs migration and invasion behaviors, and promotes cell apoptosis in CRC [91, 92]; hsa_circ_0026344 overexpression decreases the growth and invasion of CRC cells while inducing cell apoptosis in vitro and inhibiting CRC growth in vivo [93, 94]. In addition, some circRNAs inhibit the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), which is a process strongly correlated with metastasis, in CRC cells [73, 94, 95] (Fig. 3c; Additional file 2). Geng et al. confirmed that the overexpression of hsa_circ_0009361 suppresses the proliferation, EMT, migration, and invasion of CRC cells by upregulating the expression of APC2 and inhibiting the activity of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway, which is capable of inducing EMT .
Notably, Wu et al. observed the upregulation of hsa_circ_0000615 (circZNF609), a circRNA with multiple functions in human diseases, in CRC tissues, and the knockdown of circZNF609 inhibited the migration of HCT116 cells by suppressing Gli1 expression via microRNA-150 . In contrast, Zhang et al. verified that circZNF609 was significantly downregulated in CRC tissues, cells and serum from patients with CRC compared with normal controls; the overexpression of circZNF609 inhibits cell proliferation and induces apoptosis by upregulating the expression of the pro-apoptotic protein Bax, downregulating the expression of the anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-2, and upregulating p53 . Therefore, the expression and role of circZNF609 in CRC require further investigation.
The standard treatment for advanced CRC is surgery combined with chemotherapy (pre- or postoperation) in which 5-FU and platinum (e.g., oxaliplatin) are the first-line drugs [98, 99]. However, chemoresistance has substantially affected the effectiveness of CRC treatments, resulting in tumor relapse accompanied by metastasis. Based on accumulating evidence, circRNAs may function as essential regulators of drug resistance in cancers, including CRC [37, 100,101,102,103,104,105] (Additional file 2). For example, Lai et al. observed the increased expression of hsa_circ_0079662 in oxaliplatin-resistant CRC cell lines, and the knockdown of hsa_circ_0079662 inhibited the proliferation, migration, and invasion of these cells . As shown in a study by Ren et al., hsa_circ_0002211 (circDDX17) overexpression increases 5-FU sensitivity and the apoptosis rate while blocking tumor growth and increasing 5-FU sensitivity in vivo . Moreover, Jian et al. found that hsa_circ_0000598 (circ_001680) increased the colorectal CSC cell population in CRC and induced irinotecan therapeutic resistance by regulating the expression of the miR-340 target gene BMI1 . Furthermore, Wang et al. confirmed that exosomes from oxaliplatin-resistant CRC cells transfer hsa_circ_0005963 (ciRS-122) to oxaliplatin-sensitive cells, thereby enhancing glycolysis and drug resistance by promoting PKM2 expression .
Radiotherapy is among the most important treatments for CRC in combination with surgery and/or chemotherapy. Unfortunately, CRC radioresistance substantially limits the efficacy of radiotherapy, such as reducing the tumor volume and preventing postoperative recurrence [106, 107]. Based on accumulating evidence, ncRNAs, including miRNAs, lncRNAs, and circRNAs, play increasingly important roles in the process regulating radiation responses [108,109,110] (Additional file 2). Li et al. observed that after carbon ion irradiation, hsa_circ_0095155 (circRNA CBL.11) expression was increased in CRC cells and suppressed the proliferation of CRC cells through the miR-6778-5p/YWHAE axis . Another example is hsa_circ_0001313 (circCCDC66), which promotes CRC growth and metastasis [112, 113] and induces drug-resistance . Wang et al. further confirmed that circCCDC66 expression was remarkably increased in radioresistant colon cancer tissues compared with radiosensitive tissues and was expressed at high levels in colon cancer cells exposed to radiation . The knockdown of circCCDC66 reduces cell viability and the colony formation rate and increases caspase-3 activity in irradiated colon cancer cells by negatively regulating miR-338-3p, suggesting that circCCDC66 plays a role in radiotherapy resistance .
Molecular mechanisms of circRNAs in CRC
Upstream regulator of circRNA biogenesis
The mechanism underlying circRNA biogenesis, particularly the process regulating circRNA formation, remains largely unknown. Notably, relevant studies concerning CRC may provide insight into the molecular mechanism of circRNA dysregulation (Fig. 4). RBPs (e.g., QKI and FUS) play essential roles in the production of circRNAs by binding the flanking intronic regions of circRNAs [115, 116] (Fig. 4b). Consistent with these results, Zhou et al. found that the silencing of QKI reduced circCAMSAP1 expression in CRC cells by approximately 20% . More importantly, the authors identified the splicing factor ESRP1, which mediated the biogenesis of circCAMSAP1 in CRC cells by interacting with “GGT-rich” motifs in the flanking intronic regions of circCAMSAP1 . ESRP1 knockdown reduces circCAMSAP1 expression in CRC cells by approximately 50%, and ESRP1 regulates the expression of circBIRC6 in human embryonic stem cells . Consistent with previous results, Han et al. documented that the biogenesis of hsa_circ_0008558 (circLONP2) was modulated by FUS (a well-known proto-oncogene) and that circLONP2 was downregulated upon FUS knockdown with a small interfering RNA (siRNA) . Thus, multiple splicing factors may participate in the biogenesis of individual circRNAs; meanwhile, certain splicing factors may also regulate the expression of different circRNAs in various diseases.
Some transcription factors are also implicated in the biogenesis of specific circRNAs (Fig. 4c). According to Ren et al., hsa_circ_0001178 promotes the metastatic dissemination of CRC by increasing ZEB1 expression and concurrently sponging miR-382/587/616 . Subsequently, ZEB1, a key transcription factor, also increases hsa_circ_0001178 expression by physically binding the promoter region of hsa_circ_0001178 . Therefore, a positive feedback loop is formed between hsa_circ_0001178 and ZEB1 that amplifies the pro-metastatic role of the hsa_circ_0001178/miRNAs/ZEB1 ceRNA axis in CRC. As shown in a study by Li et al., c-Myb increases the expression of circHIPK3 by directly binding its promoter region , which is consistent with previous reports [120, 121]. Moreover, Li et al. reported that the expression of circACC1, which plays a critical role in CRC cellular responses to metabolic stress, is preferentially mediated by the transcription factor c-Jun over ACC1 in response to serum deprivation .
Another pioneer study showed that ATP-dependent RNA helicase A (also known as DHX9), which unwinds the helical structure of double-stranded RNA (dsRNA), suppresses the biogenesis of circRNAs that rely on base pairing between inverted repeats . Consistent with this finding, Lin et al. proposed that the expression of circCCDC66 is induced by oxaliplatin through PI3KK-mediated DHX9 phosphorylation, which may impair the capacity of DHX9 to resolve RNA pairing  (Fig. 4d). Their findings provide a novel and alternative mechanism explaining the link between oncogenic circRNAs and the upregulated expression of DHX9 in cancers.
In addition, base pairing between reverse complementary sequences (RCMs), particularly Alu elements located in the upstream and downstream introns, bring flanking introns in close proximity to promote backsplicing [9, 25, 123] (Fig. 4a and e). According to a study by Li et al., the presence of full-length flanking introns led to high circITGA7 expression in CRC cells, and no expression was observed when the flanking introns were deleted . However, the deletion of Alu sequences alone had a minimal effect on circITGA7 formation because Alu sequences exist only in the upstream intron of circITGA7, not in the downstream intron . Therefore, other RCMs may be located in the flanking introns and facilitate backsplicing, or other factors may mediate the circularization of circITGA7.
Finally, circRNA formation is induced by certain drugs [83, 124, 125], chemokines  and stress [80, 126] (Fig. 4f). Chaudhary et al. observed the upregulation of hsa_circ_0027492 (circMDM2) in three p53 wild-type CRC lines (HCT116, RKO and SW48 cells) after treatment with the DNA-damaging agent doxorubicin, and the overexpression of circMDM2 was induced in a p53-dependent manner and was not restricted to CRC cells . Shen et al. observed the downregulation of circ_0026344 following costimulation with CCL20 and CXCL8 (two well-known chemokines), leading to EMT in CRC cells . Shi et al. verified that a hypoxic tumor microenvironment played a vital role in inducing the expression of hsa_circ_0000826 in CRC tissues, which promotes CRC tumorigenesis and liver metastasis in vitro and in vivo .
Despite the mechanisms proposed above, the detailed mechanisms underlying circRNA dysregulation are far from understood and require further investigation. Additionally, the disruption of the balance among circRNA biogenesis, intracellular localization, and turnover requires the synergistic effects of multiple factors. Accordingly, a study by Kramer et al. further suggested that the generation of many circRNAs is comprehensively modulated by a combination of cis-acting elements and trans-acting splicing factors, including hnRNPs and SR proteins .
Downstream mechanisms of circRNA functions
In an authoritative review, Kristensen et al. summarized six general mechanisms of circRNA functions, including acting as (i) miRNA sponges or decoys, (ii) protein sponges or decoys, (iii) protein function enhancers, (iv) protein scaffolds, (v) protein recruiters, and (vi) translation templates . Mechanistic studies published to date reveal that the dysregulated circRNAs in CRC may exert their biological functions through these molecular mechanisms (Fig. 5; Additional file 2).
miRNA sponge or decoy
The competitive endogenous RNA (ceRNA) hypothesis posits that transcripts with shared miRNA binding sites compete for posttranscriptional control; specifically, RNAs affect miRNA activity through sequestration, thereby indirectly mediating the posttranscriptional upregulation of miRNA target mRNAs . This hypothesis has attracted notable attention as a unifying function of lncRNAs, pseudogene transcripts and circRNAs, as well as an alternative function of mRNAs [129, 130]. The human genome contains more than 500 miRNA-encoding genes, and miRNAs from individual gene families are able to target and modulate the stability and translation of hundreds of different mRNAs [131, 132]. Many circRNAs contain various types and numbers of miRNA binding sites that specifically bind miRNAs, thereby reducing miRNA activity and upregulating the expression of miRNA target genes. As more than half of all human mRNAs are estimated to be conserved miRNA targets , circRNAs are thought to exert widespread effects by regulating gene expression.
In CRC, most circRNAs identified to date have been proposed to function as miRNA sponges or decoys (Fig. 5a; Additional files 2, 4, 5). Some circRNAs even bind several miRNAs, as exemplified by circCCDC66, which contains target sites for miR-33b, miR-93, miR-510-5p and miR-338-3p [112,113,114]. Thus, these circRNAs may perform various functions by sponging different miRNAs. As shown in a study by Hu et al., hsa_circ_0001461 (circFAT1) upregulates UHRF1 to modulate CRC cell proliferation, apoptosis, and glycolysis by targeting miR-520b and miR-302c-3p . Ren et al. revealed that hsa_circ_0001178 functions as a ceRNA for miR-382/587/616 to upregulate ZEB1 (a key trigger of EMT), subsequently facilitating the metastatic dissemination of CRC . In addition, specific circRNAs promote the transcription of their host genes  or protect their homologous mRNAs from miRNA-mediated degradation by inhibiting miRNA activity [105, 133]. For example, Wang et al. revealed that hsa_circ_0060745, a circRNA derived from exons 9 and 10 of CSE1L, functions as a ceRNA to sequester miR-4736 and promotes the CSE1L-mediated proliferation and metastasis of CRC cells . Lai et al. concluded that hsa_circ_0079662 (circHOXA9), a ceRNA that binds hsa-mir-324-5p, upregulates the expression of the target gene HOXA9 and induces oxaliplatin resistance in human colon cancer through the TNF-α pathway . Furthermore, a few circRNAs may indirectly activate or inactivate several vital signaling pathways, such as the Wnt/β-catenin pathway [73, 94, 101, 134,135,136], EGFR/RAF1/MAPK pathway , PTEN/PI3K/AKT pathway , Ras pathway , etc., by suppressing miRNAs. For instance, Fang et al. revealed that hsa_circ_0013339 (circRNA_100290) functions as a ceRNA for FZD4 by sponging miR-516b, leading to the activation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway . Li et al. observed the binding of hsa_circ_0026782 (circITGA7) to miR-370-3p to antagonize its suppression of NF1, which is a well-known negative regulator of the Ras pathway; furthermore, circITGA7 upregulates the expression of ITGA7 by suppressing RREB1 through the inhibition of the Ras pathway .
Protein sponge or decoy
Individual circRNAs containing RBP binding motifs may function as sponges or decoys of these proteins and indirectly regulate RBP-dependent functions (Fig. 5b; Additional file 2). One example is hsa_circ_0005273 (circPTK2), which is backspliced from three exons (exons 27, 28, and 29) of PTK2 . Vimentin is a type 3 intermediate filament protein that is responsible for maintaining the cell shape and stabilizing cytoskeletal interactions. Vimentin is a critical mesenchymal marker in EMT and serves as an organizer of many key proteins involved in cell attachment and migration . The phosphorylation of serine residues in vimentin inhibits subunit polymerization, subsequently promoting the disassembly of vimentin filaments and increasing the solubility of the protein . Yang et al. described the physical interaction between circPTK2 and the vimentin protein at the phosphorylation sites Ser38, Ser55 and Ser82, protecting vimentin from phosphorylation by PKA, CDK1 or PLK; then, vimentin promotes EMT in CRC cells both in vitro and in vivo .
Enhancer of protein function
As a structural component of protein complexes, circRNAs may interact with and enhance the function of specific proteins (Fig. 5c; Additional file 2). Notably, hsa_circ_0007380 (circNSUN2), also known as circRNA_103783, is located on the chromosome 5p15.31 amplicon of CRC and is derived from exon 4 and 5 regions within the NSUN2 locus . Chen et al. revealed that circNSUN2 was mainly localized in the cytoplasm but was also present in the nucleus . Moreover, YTHDC1, also known as an N6-methyladenosine modification (m6A) reader, promotes the cytoplasmic export of m6A-modified circNSUN2 by interacting with the GAACU m6A motif within the exon 5-exon 4 junction site of circNSUN2 . Furthermore, IGF2BP2, an RBP essential for mRNA stability [141, 142], binds the CAUCAU motif of circNSUN2 through the KH3–4 di-domain; then, circNSUN2/IGF2BP2 forms an RNA-protein complex in the cytoplasm . More importantly, the AAACA site of circNSUN2 directly binds the 3′UTR of HMGA2 with AU-rich elements ; HMGA2 has been reported to induce EMT and contribute to colon cancer progression . Based on these results, circNSUN2 plays a critical role in the liver metastasis of CRC by promoting interactions between IGF2BP2 and HMGA2 and increases the stability of HMGA2 mRNA through the formation of a ternary circNSUN2/IGF2BP2/HMGA2 RNA-protein complex.
Specific circRNAs (e.g., circAmotl1 and circFoxo3) function as protein scaffolds to promote the colocalization of enzymes (such as acetylases, phosphatases and ubiquitin ligases) and their substrates to alter reaction kinetics [144, 145] (Fig. 5d; Additional file 2). Notably, hsa_circ_001391 (circACC1) is generated from exons 2, 3, and 4 of the ACC1 gene, which is located on human chr17 and does not share homology with mouse sequences . AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) is among the most well-known metabolic enzymes and plays a crucial role in maintaining energy homeostasis . In response to energy stress, AMPK, which is a critical sensor of the cellular energy status, phosphorylates and activates PFK-2, which stimulates glycolysis [147, 148], while AMPK inhibits fatty acid synthesis (FAS) and stimulates fatty acid oxidation (FAO) by phosphorylating ACC1 and ACC-2, respectively . In a study by Li et al., circACC1 bound the regulatory β and γ subunits and, as a result of this interaction, promoted the assembly, stabilization, and activity of the AMPK holoenzyme in HCT116 cells . Moreover, the unassociated subunits were subjected to ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation, as previously described [150, 151]. Furthermore, the knockdown of circACC1 not only decreased the phosphorylation of ACC1 but also significantly decreased the phosphorylation of PFKFB3 at Ser461 , which is one of two PFK2 isoforms regulated by AMPK and a proxy measure of PFK2 activation [147, 148]; in contrast, the overexpression of circACC1 increased PFKFB3 phosphorylation . Collectively, circACC1 not only functions as a scaffold to mediate holoenzyme assembly and stability but also increases AMPK activity, which subsequently promotes glycolysis and FAO in CRC.
Protein recruitment site
In addition to their other functions, circRNAs may recruit specific proteins to certain loci or subcellular compartments (Fig. 5e; Additional file 2) as exemplified by FLI1 exonic circular RNA (FECR1), which recruits methylcytosine dioxygenase TET1 to the promoter region of its own parental gene, resulting in the demethylation of CpG sites and active transcription of the FLI1 gene . Han et al. identified a high level of hsa_circ_0008558 (circLONP2) expression in metastasis-initiating subgroups of CRC and an essential role in the metastasis of CRC cells . Mechanistically, circLONP2 directly interacts with and promotes the processing of primary miR-17 by recruiting DGCR8 and the Drosha complex in a DDX1-dependent manner . Meanwhile, overexpressed mature miR-17-5p is assembled into exosomes and internalized by neighboring cells to enhance their aggressiveness . In addition, Zhan et al. observed a higher expression of hsa_circRNA_103809, also known as circCTIC1, in colon tumor-initiating cells (TICs), which drove the self-renewal of colon TICs in a c-Myc-dependent manner . Specifically, circCTIC1 interacts with the NURF complex through BPTF (the core component of NURF complex), recruits the NURF complex to the c-Myc promoter and finally drives the transcriptional initiation of c-Myc .
Although most circRNAs are thought to be noncoding because they lack elements essential for cap-dependent translation, such as the 5′ cap and the 3′ poly (A) tail [10, 23, 24, 153, 154], a subset of circRNAs with initial codon sites (AUG), an open reading frame (ORF) and internal ribosome entry site (IRES) elements may be translated under certain circumstances, producing unique peptides with special functions [14, 155,156,157,158,159] (Fig. 5f; Additional file 2). To date, only a few endogenous circRNAs, such as circSHPRH, circFBXW7, circLINC-PINT, circAKT3 and circβ-catenin, have been shown to function as protein templates in human cancers , although thousands of circRNAs are predicted to include a putative ORF with an upstream IRES . As circRNA-derived peptides (e.g., FBXW7-185aa) are often shorter than their related linear mRNA-translated proteins and lack essential functional domains (e.g., WD-40 domains), they may function as dominant-deleted protein variants, decoys or regulators of alternative proteins . The first translated circRNA identified in CRC was hsa_circ_0000423 (named circPPP1R12A), and its expression is significantly increased in colon cancer tissues . Zheng et al. identified an ORF in circPPP1R12A, which encoded a functional protein (named circPPP1R12A-73aa) . Moreover, the authors confirmed that circPPP1R12A-73aa, but not circPPP1R12A, promoted the proliferation, migration and invasion of colon cancer by activating the Hippo-YAP signaling pathway . Zhi et al. also identified a novel circRNA, circLgr4 (hsa_circ_02276), with a peptide-coding capacity. Furthermore, circLgr4 was expressed at high levels in colorectal cancer stem cells (CSCs) and drove colorectal CSC self-renewal, tumorigenesis and invasion in a peptide-dependent manner . Importantly, the circLgr4-derived peptide interacted with and activated Lgr4, which further promoted the activation of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway .
Importantly, circRNAs may regulate the expression of cell cycle-related proteins (e.g., p53 and p16) [72, 125], apoptosis-related proteins (e.g., Bax and Bcl-2) [97, 163] and EMT-related proteins (e.g., MMP2, MMP-9, and E-cadherin) [164,165,166] to mediate cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, and EMT. Additionally, circRNAs directly regulate CRC-associated signaling pathways, such as the Wnt/β-catenin pathway [76, 78, 167] and PTEN/Akt/mTOR pathway [168, 169]. However, the specific mechanisms underlying these circRNA functions are still unknown.
Notably, hsa_circ_0001946 (ciRS-7), originating from chrX, has been shown to be involved in the growth and metastasis of CRC through various mechanisms. In a previous study, ciRS-7 was significantly upregulated in CRC, and the overexpression of ciRS-7 in CRC cells led to the suppression of miR-7, resulting in a more aggressive oncogenic phenotype . This proposal was supported by two other studies showing that ciRS-7 contributed to the proliferation and metastasis of CRC by targeting miR-7  and miR-135a-5p , respectively. In contrast, Tanaka et al. did not observe alterations in cell growth or invasion following ciRS-7 overexpression, whereas the ectopic expression of ciRS-7 led to increased levels of CMTM4 and CMTM6, which were recently identified as crucial regulators of PD-L1 protein expression at the cell surface . Accordingly, the cell surface levels of the PD-L1 protein were increased in ciRS-7-overexpressing CRC cells. However, the effects were not reversed by miR-7 overexpression, indicating that the increase in the cell surface level of PD-L1 in the ciRS-7-overexpressing cells was independent of miR-7 function .
Clinical significance of circRNAs in CRC
Compared with other ncRNAs, such as miRNAs and lncRNAs, circRNAs are more suitable as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers because of their high stability, long half-life (> 48 h), tissue-specific expression, and unique expression signatures, which are significantly associated with cancer progression and outcomes. Moreover, circRNAs are abundant and widely distributed in various tissues and body fluids, including blood, urine, and saliva, and are even enriched in exosomes; thus, they are promising candidates for noninvasive liquid biopsy indicators. Furthermore, numerous circRNAs have been characterized as functional molecules contributing to cancer initiation and progression, making them potential therapeutic targets. Here, we discuss the clinical implications of circRNAs in CRC.
circRNAs as promising diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers
First, circRNAs present distinct expression patterns in CRC tissues and blood from patients with CRC compared with normal controls, and thus, they are considered promising tissue or liquid biopsy biomarkers for the diagnosis of CRC (Additional file 3). For example, Hsiao et al. identified increased circCCDC66 expression in colon cancer, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was as high as 0.8843 . The AUC of circCCDC66 suggests that 88% of randomly chosen patients with colon cancer will have higher levels of circCCDC66 than randomly chosen normal subjects, indicating that the expression level of circCCDC66 is a good indicator for the detection of colon cancer . Li et al. documented a significant downregulation of both circITGA7 and its linear host gene ITGA7 in CRC tissues, and the AUC of circITGA7 was 0.8791, with a sensitivity of 0.9275 and a specificity of 0.6667, which was much higher than the value of ITGA7 (AUC = 0.7402) . Xie et al. revealed significantly increased serum exosomal hsa_circ_0101802 (circPNN) levels in patients with CRC compared with healthy control groups . A receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis indicated that circPNN had significant value in diagnosing CRC, with AUCs of 0.855 and 0.826 in the training and validation sets, respectively . Moreover, the AUC of serum exosomal circPNN for early-stage CRC was 0.854, suggesting that serum exosomal circPNN might be a potential noninvasive biomarker for the early diagnosis of CRC . Zhu et al. identified three circRNAs (hsa_circ_0049487, hsa_circ_0066875, and hsa_circ_0007444) as possible novel biomarkers for the prediction of the transition from colonic adenoma to CRC .
Second, circRNAs associated with clinicopathological characteristics, such as lymph metastasis, distal metastasis, and postoperative recurrence, may serve as valuable predictive markers in patients with CRC (Additional file 3). For instance, the circPTK2 levels are increased in both CRC tissues and serum and are positively correlated with lymph node or distal metastases; moreover, an ROC analysis showed that circPTK2 is a marker of CRC in patients with nodal (AUC = 0.7249) or distal (AUC =0.7865) metastases . Xu et al. demonstrated that circRNA_0001178 and circRNA_0000826 were significantly upregulated in CRC tissues from patients with liver metastasis compared to patients without liver metastasis, and both circRNAs have the potential to distinguish liver metastases from CRC; the AUCs were 0.945 for circRNA_0001178 and 0.816 for circRNA_0000826 . Ju et al. generated a four-circRNA-based cirScore, including hsa_circ_0122319, hsa_circ_0087391, hsa_circ_0079480, and hsa_circ_0008039, based on an RNA-seq analysis, quantitative validation and clinical information . After assessment in the training cohort and validation in the internal and external cohorts, the authors confirmed that the four-circRNA-based classifier is a reliable tool for the prediction of postoperative disease recurrence in patients with stage II/III colon cancer (AUC = 0.85) .
Finally, circRNAs related to the survival time of patients with CRC may represent attractive prognostic biomarkers (Additional file 3). For example, Jin et al. observed significantly upregulated hsa_circ_0005075 expression in CRC tissues; more importantly, a multivariate analysis revealed that the hsa_circ_0005075 expression level was independently associated with overall survival (OS) (HR = 3.237, 95% CI: 1.479–5.158, P = 0.003) and disease-free survival (DFS) (HR = 3.452, 95% CI: 1.638–5.438, P = 0.001) . A study by Xiao et al. revealed increased hsa_circ_0022382 (circFADS2) expression in 93.5% (187/200) of patients with CRC . Moreover, a multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that in addition to distant metastasis and the TNM stage, circFADS2 expression was another independent predictor of the CRC prognosis (HR = 6.228, 95% CI: 1.287–30.131, P = 0.023) . Furthermore, the ROC curve analyses indicated that the AUC of circFADS2 expression for the prediction of OS was 0.803, which was less than the TNM stage (0.917) and lymphatic metastasis (0.876) but apparently greater than the invasion depth (0.691) and distant metastasis (0.585) . Similarly, a study by Chen et al. identified circ 001971 expression (HR = 6.456, 95% CI: 2.060–20.232, P = 0.001) and TNM stage as independent factors of OS with good prognostic capability (AUC = 0.792) .
circRNAs as potential therapeutic targets
According to our review, more than 70 upregulated circRNAs are actively involved in the tumorigenesis and progression of CRC, and the silencing of these circRNAs exerts opposite effects in vitro and in vivo (Additional file 2). Thus, these oncogenic circRNAs may serve as potential therapeutic targets, and precise interfering RNAs that are delicately designed to accurately target the unique backspliced junction of oncogenic circRNAs may exert an anti-tumor effect. Accumulating studies using animal models, particularly patient-derived xenograft (PDX) mouse models, have revealed that small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) or short hairpin RNAs (shRNAs) specifically targeting oncogenic circRNAs effectively inhibit CRC growth and metastasis [37, 66, 85, 118, 137, 140, 176, 177]. For example, Yang et al. reported that a tail vein injection of an shRNA specifically targeting circPTK2 reduced tumor metastasis in a CRC-PDX model, suggesting that the oncogenic circPTK2 may serve as a potential therapeutic target for CRC metastasis . Chen et al. substantiated their results using an in vivo metastasis PDX model and showed that tumor metastasis was significantly inhibited after the knockdown of circNSUN2 in PDX cells compared to control cells in either liver or lung metastasis models . Similarly, according to a study by Han et al., an antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) targeting circLONP2 dramatically reduced the penetrance of metastasis to distal organs in vivo, including reductions in both the nodule size and numbers . Interestingly, Wang et al. confirmed that the targeting of ciRS-122 by systemically injecting an exosome-delivered siRNA in a mouse model of oxaliplatin-resistant CRC sensitized CRC to oxaliplatin, suggesting a novel potential approach for the reversion of oxaliplatin resistance in CRC . Additionally, certain drugs or compounds may exhibit anticancer activity through a circRNA-associated axis [83, 124, 162]. For instance, Du et al. confirmed that lidocaine decreases circHOMER1 expression in CRC cells and suppresses cell proliferation and aerobic glycolysis by regulating the circHOMER1/miR-138-5p/HEY1 axis, providing a novel treatment option using lidocaine to prevent the progression of CRC . As shown in a study by Zhen et al., the YAP-specific inhibitor peptide 17 dramatically alleviates the effect of circPPP1R12A-73aa on promoting the growth of colon cancer cells .
To the best of our knowledge, at least 20 downregulated circRNAs have been verified to negatively regulate the growth and metastasis of CRC (Additional file 2). The induction of the expression of these tumor suppressor circRNAs in CRC cells or tissues might yield substantial antitumor effects partially due to the high stability and long half-life of circRNAs. Li et al. observed that after carbon ion irradiation, the expression of the circRNA CBL.11 was induced in CRC cells and suppressed cell proliferation by sponging miR-6778-5p . In addition, exogenous circRNAs might be delivered by specific vectors containing DNA cassettes designed for circRNA expression or the transfection of purified in vitro-generated circRNAs . A few studies confirmed the synthesis and cloning of circRNA sequences into special plasmid vectors (e.g., pLCDH-cir; Ribobio, Guangzhou, China) for the production of lentiviruses to stably transfect CRC cell lines and constitutively overexpress the desired circRNAs; then, the exogenous circRNA acted as a tumor suppressor by sponging various miRNAs [73, 89, 94, 179]. For this purpose, the introduction of engineered circRNAs as sponges for specific oncogenic miRNAs into CRC cells or tissues might represent a new and efficient approach for future cancer therapy.
Some circRNAs mentioned above, such as hsa_circ_001680 , ciRS-122 , circCCDC66 [104, 114], and circRNA CBL.11 , are related to chemoradiation resistance in CRC (Additional file 2). Therefore, the detection of the expression of these circRNAs may be important for predicting the sensitivity of patients with CRC to chemoradiotherapy in the clinic. Moreover, therapy targeting these circRNAs may regulate the resistance of patients with CRC to chemoradiotherapy. Finally, interventional methods targeting CDR1-AS, which increases the PD-L1 levels on the surface of CRC cells, may increase the effectiveness of current immunotherapy, namely, PD-1/PD-L1 blocking therapies .
Insights and limitations of current research
Although substantial progress has been achieved in identifying and characterizing circRNAs, many crucial unknown factors and limitations of research investigating circRNAs’ biological process still need to be addressed in further studies.
First, how are circRNAs exported from the nucleus to the cytoplasm? Most circRNAs accumulate in the cytoplasm, but how their localization or nuclear export is controlled remains largely unknown. A study by Huang et al. showed that a length-dependent evolutionarily conserved pathway mediated by Hel25E and its homologs (UAP56 and URH49) controls the nuclear export of circRNAs . Additionally, RBP-mediated selective transportation  or m6A modification  has been proposed to facilitate the cytoplasmic export of circRNAs. These discoveries are timely, novel, and pivotal and certainly raise more questions for further studies [181, 182]. For example, how do UAP56 and URH49 define long and short circRNAs? Which factor(s) regulate these pathways? Are there additional mechanisms responsible for the nuclear export of circRNAs? The answers to these questions could also shed light on the biogenesis and functions of circRNAs. Additionally, whether UAP56 targeted small molecule inhibitors  or specific inhibitors of nuclear export (SINE) compounds  can be used to target tumors that overexpress circRNA remains unknown.
Second, how do circRNAs decay? Although several endonucleases (e.g., RNase P and RNase L) have been proposed to trigger the internal cleavage of circRNAs under certain conditions , the detailed turnover process is largely unknown. Future studies should focus on which extracellular or intracellular signals initiate circRNA degradation, which endonucleases or other enzymes account for opening the loop, and how the opened fragments are ultimately degraded. Extracellular vesicles or exosomes might be another possible mechanism by which cells clear redundant circRNAs, but the mechanism guiding circRNA exosome assembly, exocytosis and endocytosis is poorly understood.
Third, why are circRNAs dysregulated in tumors? A balance exists among circRNA generation, localization, and degradation, which is elaborately regulated by cis-elements, trans-acting factors, and the tumor microenvironment. When the balance is disrupted, the expression of circRNAs is altered. However, the specific mechanisms underlying circRNA biogenesis, distribution, and degradation remain elusive.
Forth, how do circRNAs exert their functions in tumors? Dysregulated circRNAs play critical roles in cancer metabolism , cancer immune escape , the tumor microenvironment [188, 189], and chemoradiotherapy resistance , but explorations of their underlying mechanisms have simply scratched the surface. Although the ceRNA hypothesis has been proposed as the most common mechanism by which circRNAs perform their functions, this sponge function of circRNAs has been questioned partially because physiological changes in the expression of most individual transcripts (e.g., lncRNAs and circRNAs) do not compromise miRNA activity [129, 191]. Specifically, few circRNAs harbor as many miRNA binding sites for a single miRNA as ciRS-7 [12, 13] and circZNF91 [23, 192], and the abundance of many circRNAs is far less than that of miRNAs, preventing them from achieving the miRNA sponge effect. Thus, the stoichiometric relationship between the miRNA binding sites of circRNAs and the mRNA target sites of miRNAs must be considered before assigning ceRNA functions to circRNAs . Encoding functional peptides or proteins is another novel and critical mechanism by which circRNAs exert their effects in cancers. Recently, Liu et al. even identified an endogenous rolling-translated protein of circular EGFR RNA (circ-EGFR) that sustains EGFR signaling activation and promotes glioblastoma tumorigenicity . Although thousands of circRNAs are predicted to include a putative ORF with an upstream IRES, only a few circRNAs have been shown to be translated into peptides in human cancers [160, 194]. More efforts should be exerted to predict and identify circRNA encoded peptides, as these peptides are highly cancer specific and could become a new resource for anti-tumor protein drug screening.
Finally, how can circRNAs be utilized in clinical practice? Although researchers have suggested that circRNAs represent promising diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers, particularly noninvasive biomarkers (in blood samples), completely noninvasive samples (stool, urine, saliva, etc.) should be promoted for detection and research. Further studies might focus on screening and validating more circRNA biomarker candidates in a large pool of tumor samples. Moreover, targeting oncogenic circRNAs with ASOs at unique backspliced junctions or promoting the effect of tumor suppressor circRNAs may be promising therapeutic strategies for patients with cancer. Excitingly, researchers have designed and constructed artificial circRNAs using enzymatic ligation in vitro [195,196,197]. Pioneer studies have shown that these synthetic circRNAs can be stably expressed in cancer cells and efficiently function as miRNA sponges (e.g., miR-21 and miR-93) [195, 196] or protein sponges (e.g., hnRNP L) . In the future, artificial circRNAs could be a potential tool in molecular biology and medicine.
Innovative approaches for future research
We are pleased to report that research investigating circRNAs is progressing at a steady and fast pace, but limitations and challenges in the methodologies of circRNA studies remain [191, 198]. For example, circRNAs are usually of low abundance, and their sequences often overlap with those of their linear counterparts; thus, more sensitive and specific methods are required for their detection. Moreover, the unique structure of circRNAs is the backspliced junction (BSJ) site, leaving very limited choices for specific primer design, probe design and siRNA design. Furthermore, the CRISPR-Cas9 system may be restricted in knockout studies of circRNAs because attempts to delete the whole sequence could disturb the expression of cognate mRNAs and impact specific loss-of-function studies. These challenges call for more advanced technologies for circRNA detection, interference, and other functional studies. Notably, several promising techniques, such as single-cell RNA-seq [199, 200], digital spatial profiling [201,202,203], and the Oxford Nanopore MinION technology [204, 205], will be helpful in this endeavor. In the future, we expect these technologies to be adapted to allow spatial and temporal gene expression analyses and the quantification of circRNAs. More importantly, Chen and colleagues reported a study in Nature Methods showing that the CRISPR-Cas13 technique can be used to knock down circRNAs without any influence on homologous mRNAs by using guide RNA targeting sequences spanning BSJ sites featured in circRNAs . The CRISPR-RfxCas13d system may serve as a useful tool for the discovery and functional study of circRNAs at both the individual and large-scale level in the near future . Finally, an increasing number of online databases have been developed and improved to provide tremendous valuable information, such as Ularcirc , IMS-CDA , Lnc2Cancer 3.0 , LincSNP 3.0 , etc. These online resources will be applied for circRNA identification, characterization and functional analyses and serve as tools for investigating the interaction between circRNAs and other molecules (e.g., miRNAs and RBPs).
Current functional, mechanistic, and clinical insights highlight the important roles of circRNAs in cancer, but we propose that these functions are only the beginning. A better understanding of the mechanisms modulating the circRNA fate, the downstream effectors of circRNA regulatory networks, and the clinical relevance of circRNAs in cancer will increase our knowledge of the roles of circRNAs in cancer biology and the development of circRNA-based diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutic methods for cancer.
In summary, CRC is a multistep, multistage and multifactor comprehensive hereditary disease, but the specific pathogenic mechanism has not been completely elucidated. Although significant progress has been achieved in the diagnosis and treatment of CRC in recent decades, the prognosis of patients with advanced CRC, particularly patients with distant metastasis, remains poor. Notably, circRNAs constitute a new class of ncRNAs, and their biological functions include various physiological and pathophysiological processes, which have attracted increasing attention. In particular, circRNAs play crucial roles in the occurrence and development of tumors, rendering them hotspots in the field of cancer research. As described in this review, circRNAs are aberrantly expressed in CRC and are associated with the clinicopathological features and prognosis of patients with CRC. More importantly, individual circRNAs may play pro-cancer, anti-cancer, or chemoradiation sensitivity-regulating roles in the tumorigenesis, metastasis and drug resistance of CRC through various molecular mechanisms. These circRNAs may serve as potential diagnostic indicators, prognostic predictors, or therapeutic targets in the clinical diagnosis and treatment of CRC, thus prolonging the survival time and improving the quality of life of patients with CRC.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article and its additional files.
Polymerase chain reaction
RNA binding proteins
Exonic circular RNAs
Exon-intron circular RNAs
Circular intronic RNAs
- RNase P:
Multidrug resistance-associated protein 1
YTH domain-containing family protein 2
Small nuclear ribonucleoprotein
Long noncoding RNAs
Differentially expressed circRNAs
Transmission electron microscopy
Cancer stem cells
Small interfering RNA
Short hairpin RNAs
Reverse complementary sequences
Competitive endogenous RNA
Fatty acid synthesis
Fatty acid oxidation
Initial codon sites
Internal ribosome entry site
Open reading frames
Receiver operating characteristic curve
Area under the curve
Carbohydrate antigen 19–9
Disease free survival
Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:394–424.
Arnold M, Sierra MS, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global patterns and trends in colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. Gut. 2017;66:683–91.
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66:7–30.
Sanger HL, Klotz G, Riesner D, Gross HJ, Kleinschmidt AK. Viroids are single-stranded covalently closed circular RNA molecules existing as highly base-paired rod-like structures. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1976;73:3852–6.
Cocquerelle C, Mascrez B, Hétuin D, Bailleul B. Mis-splicing yields circular RNA molecules. FASEB J. 1993;7:155–60.
Capel B, Swain A, Nicolis S, Hacker A, Walter M, Koopman P, et al. Circular transcripts of the testis-determining gene Sry in adult mouse testis. Cell. 1993;73:1019–30.
Salzman J, Gawad C, Wang PL, Lacayo N, Brown PO. Circular RNAs are the predominant transcript isoform from hundreds of human genes in diverse cell types. PLoS One. 2012;7:e30733.
Westholm JO, Miura P, Olson S, Shenker S, Joseph B, Sanfilippo P, et al. Genome-wide analysis of drosophila circular RNAs reveals their structural and sequence properties and age-dependent neural accumulation. Cell Rep. 2014;9:1966–80.
Ivanov A, Memczak S, Wyler E, Torti F, Porath HT, Orejuela MR, et al. Analysis of intron sequences reveals hallmarks of circular RNA biogenesis in animals. Cell Rep. 2015;10:170–7.
Salzman J, Chen RE, Olsen MN, Wang PL, Brown PO. Cell-type specific features of circular RNA expression. PLoS Genet. 2013;9:e1003777.
Xia S, Feng J, Lei L, Hu J, Xia L, Wang J, et al. Comprehensive characterization of tissue-specific circular RNAs in the human and mouse genomes. Brief Bioinform. 2017;18:984–92.
Memczak S, Jens M, Elefsinioti A, Torti F, Krueger J, Rybak A, et al. Circular RNAs are a large class of animal RNAs with regulatory potency. Nature. 2013;495:333–8.
Hansen TB, Jensen TI, Clausen BH, Bramsen JB, Finsen B, Damgaard CK, et al. Natural RNA circles function as efficient microRNA sponges. Nature. 2013;495:384–8.
Legnini I, Di Timoteo G, Rossi F, Morlando M, Briganti F, Sthandier O, et al. Circ-ZNF609 is a Circular RNA that can be translated and functions in Myogenesis. Mol Cell. 2017;66:22–37.e29.
Pandey PR, Yang JH, Tsitsipatis D, Panda AC, Noh JH, Kim KM, et al. circSamd4 represses myogenic transcriptional activity of PUR proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48:3789–805.
Gruner H, Cortés-López M, Cooper DA, Bauer M, Miura P. CircRNA accumulation in the aging mouse brain. Sci Rep. 2016;6:38907.
Cortés-López M, Gruner MR, Cooper DA, Gruner HN, Voda AI, van der Linden AM, et al. Global accumulation of circRNAs during aging in Caenorhabditis elegans. BMC Genomics. 2018;19:8.
Greene J, Baird AM, Brady L, Lim M, Gray SG, McDermott R, et al. Circular RNAs: biogenesis, function and role in human diseases. Front Mol Biosci. 2017;4:38.
Han B, Chao J, Yao H. Circular RNA and its mechanisms in disease: from the bench to the clinic. Pharmacol Ther. 2018;187:31–44.
Vo JN, Cieslik M, Zhang Y, Shukla S, Xiao L, Zhang Y, et al. The landscape of Circular RNA in cancer. Cell. 2019;176:869–881.e813.
Shang Q, Yang Z, Jia R, Ge S. The novel roles of circRNAs in human cancer. Mol Cancer. 2019;18:6.
Enuka Y, Lauriola M, Feldman ME, Sas-Chen A, Ulitsky I, Yarden Y. Circular RNAs are long-lived and display only minimal early alterations in response to a growth factor. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:1370–83.
Guo JU, Agarwal V, Guo H, Bartel DP. Expanded identification and characterization of mammalian circular RNAs. Genome Biol. 2014;15:409.
Jeck WR, Sorrentino JA, Wang K, Slevin MK, Burd CE, Liu J, et al. Circular RNAs are abundant, conserved, and associated with ALU repeats. Rna. 2013;19:141–57.
Kelly S, Greenman C, Cook PR, Papantonis A. Exon skipping is correlated with exon circularization. J Mol Biol. 2015;427:2414–7.
Eger N, Schoppe L, Schuster S, Laufs U, Boeckel JN. Circular RNA splicing. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2018;1087:41–52.
Zhang Y, Zhang XO, Chen T, Xiang JF, Yin QF, Xing YH, et al. Circular intronic long noncoding RNAs. Mol Cell. 2013;51:792–806.
Huang C, Liang D, Tatomer DC, Wilusz JE. A length-dependent evolutionarily conserved pathway controls nuclear export of circular RNAs. Genes Dev. 2018;32:639–44.
Park OH, Ha H, Lee Y, Boo SH, Kwon DH, Song HK, et al. Endoribonucleolytic cleavage of m(6)A-containing RNAs by RNase P/MRP complex. Mol Cell. 2019;74:494–507.e498.
Liu CX, Li X, Nan F, Jiang S, Gao X, Guo SK, et al. Structure and degradation of Circular RNAs regulate PKR activation in innate immunity. Cell. 2019;177:865–880.e821.
Hansen TB, Wiklund ED, Bramsen JB, Villadsen SB, Statham AL, Clark SJ, et al. miRNA-dependent gene silencing involving Ago2-mediated cleavage of a circular antisense RNA. EMBO J. 2011;30:4414–22.
Kleaveland B, Shi CY, Stefano J, Bartel DP. A network of noncoding regulatory RNAs acts in the mammalian brain. Cell. 2018;174:350–362.e317.
Lasda E, Parker R. Circular RNAs co-precipitate with extracellular vesicles: a possible mechanism for circRNA clearance. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0148407.
Dou Y, Cha DJ, Franklin JL, Higginbotham JN, Jeppesen DK, Weaver AM, et al. Circular RNAs are down-regulated in KRAS mutant colon cancer cells and can be transferred to exosomes. Sci Rep. 2016;6:37982.
Li Y, Zheng Q, Bao C, Li S, Guo W, Zhao J, et al. Circular RNA is enriched and stable in exosomes: a promising biomarker for cancer diagnosis. Cell Res. 2015;25:981–4.
Preußer C, Hung LH, Schneider T, Schreiner S, Hardt M, Moebus A, et al. Selective release of circRNAs in platelet-derived extracellular vesicles. J Extracell Vesicles. 2018;7:1424473.
Wang X, Zhang H, Yang H, Bai M, Ning T, Deng T, et al. Exosome-delivered circRNA promotes glycolysis to induce chemoresistance through the miR-122-PKM2 axis in colorectal cancer. Mol Oncol. 2020;14:539–55.
Li Z, Huang C, Bao C, Chen L, Lin M, Wang X, et al. Exon-intron circular RNAs regulate transcription in the nucleus. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2015;22:256–64.
Hsu MT, Coca-Prados M. Electron microscopic evidence for the circular form of RNA in the cytoplasm of eukaryotic cells. Nature. 1979;280:339–40.
Mercer TR, Dinger ME, Mattick JS. Long non-coding RNAs: insights into functions. Nat Rev Genet. 2009;10:155–9.
Tian Y, Xu Y, Wang H, Shu R, Sun L, Zeng Y, et al. Comprehensive analysis of microarray expression profiles of circRNAs and lncRNAs with associated co-expression networks in human colorectal cancer. Funct Integr Genomics. 2019;19:311–27.
Chen LL. The expanding regulatory mechanisms and cellular functions of circular RNAs. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2020;21:475–90.
Piwecka M, Glažar P, Hernandez-Miranda LR, Memczak S, Wolf SA, Rybak-Wolf A, et al. Loss of a mammalian circular RNA locus causes miRNA deregulation and affects brain function. Science. 2017;357:eaam8526.
Stoll L, Sobel J, Rodriguez-Trejo A, Guay C, Lee K, Venø MT, et al. Circular RNAs as novel regulators of β-cell functions in normal and disease conditions. Mol Metab. 2018;9:69–83.
Xu H, Guo S, Li W, Yu P. The circular RNA Cdr1as, via miR-7 and its targets, regulates insulin transcription and secretion in islet cells. Sci Rep. 2015;5:12453.
Weng W, Wei Q, Toden S, Yoshida K, Nagasaka T, Fujiwara T, et al. Circular RNA ciRS-7-a promising prognostic biomarker and a potential therapeutic target in colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23:3918–28.
Hanniford D, Ulloa-Morales A, Karz A, Berzoti-Coelho MG, Moubarak RS, Sánchez-Sendra B, et al. Epigenetic silencing of CDR1as drives IGF2BP3-mediated melanoma invasion and metastasis. Cancer Cell. 2020;37:55–70.e15.
Zheng Q, Bao C, Guo W, Li S, Chen J, Chen B, et al. Circular RNA profiling reveals an abundant circHIPK3 that regulates cell growth by sponging multiple miRNAs. Nat Commun. 2016;7:11215.
Okholm TLH, Nielsen MM, Hamilton MP, Christensen LL, Vang S, Hedegaard J, et al. Circular RNA expression is abundant and correlated to aggressiveness in early-stage bladder cancer. NPJ Genom Med. 2017;2:36.
Zeng K, Chen X, Xu M, Liu X, Hu X, Xu T, et al. CircHIPK3 promotes colorectal cancer growth and metastasis by sponging miR-7. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9:417.
Yan Y, Su M, Qin B. CircHIPK3 promotes colorectal cancer cells proliferation and metastasis via modulating of miR-1207-5p/FMNL2 signal. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2020;524:839–46.
Glažar P, Papavasileiou P, Rajewsky N. circBase: a database for circular RNAs. Rna. 2014;20:1666–70.
Chen X, Chen RX, Wei WS, Li YH, Feng ZH, Tan L, et al. PRMT5 Circular RNA promotes metastasis of Urothelial carcinoma of the bladder through sponging miR-30c to induce epithelial-Mesenchymal transition. Clin Cancer Res. 2018;24:6319–30.
Tian J, Xi X, Wang J, Yu J, Huang Q, Ma R, et al. CircRNA hsa_circ_0004585 as a potential biomarker for colorectal cancer. Cancer Manag Res. 2019;11:5413–23.
Zhou C, Liu HS, Wang FW, Hu T, Liang ZX, Lan N, et al. circCAMSAP1 promotes tumor growth in colorectal cancer via the miR-328-5p/E2F1 Axis. Mol Ther. 2020;28:914–28.
Ju HQ, Zhao Q, Wang F, Lan P, Wang Z, Zuo ZX, et al. A circRNA signature predicts postoperative recurrence in stage II/III colon cancer. EMBO Mol Med. 2019;11:e10168.
Xu H, Wang C, Song H, Xu Y, Ji G. RNA-Seq profiling of circular RNAs in human colorectal cancer liver metastasis and the potential biomarkers. Mol Cancer. 2019;18:8.
Zeng Y, Xu Y, Shu R, Sun L, Tian Y, Shi C, et al. Altered expression profiles of circular RNA in colorectal cancer tissues from patients with lung metastasis. Int J Mol Med. 2017;40:1818–28.
Yuan G, Chen T, Zhang H, Cao Q, Qiu Y, Que B, et al. Comprehensive analysis of differential circular RNA expression in a mouse model of colitis-induced colon carcinoma. Mol Carcinog. 2018;57:1825–34.
Chen LY, Zhi Z, Wang L, Zhao YY, Deng M, Liu YH, et al. NSD2 circular RNA promotes metastasis of colorectal cancer by targeting miR-199b-5p-mediated DDR1 and JAG1 signalling. J Pathol. 2019;248:103–15.
Jin C, Wang A, Liu L, Wang G, Li G. Hsa_circ_0136666 promotes the proliferation and invasion of colorectal cancer through miR-136/SH2B1 axis. J Cell Physiol. 2019;234:7247–56.
Jiang W, Zhang X, Chu Q, Lu S, Zhou L, Lu X, et al. The Circular RNA profiles of colorectal tumor metastatic cells. Front Genet. 2018;9:34.
Xiong W, Ai YQ, Li YF, Ye Q, Chen ZT, Qin JY, et al. Microarray analysis of Circular RNA expression profile associated with 5-fluorouracil-based Chemoradiation resistance in colorectal cancer cells. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:8421614.
Abu N, Hon KW, Jeyaraman S, Yahaya A, Abdullah NM, Mustangin M, et al. Identification of differentially expressed circular RNAs in chemoresistant colorectal cancer. Epigenomics. 2019;11:875–84.
Ye DX, Wang SS, Huang Y, Chi P. A 3-circular RNA signature as a noninvasive biomarker for diagnosis of colorectal cancer. Cancer Cell Int. 2019;19:276.
Feng W, Gong H, Wang Y, Zhu G, Xue T, Wang Y, et al. circIFT80 functions as a ceRNA of miR-1236-3p to promote colorectal cancer progression. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2019;18:375–87.
Hon KW, Ab-Mutalib NS, Abdullah NMA, Jamal R, Abu N. Extracellular vesicle-derived circular RNAs confers chemoresistance in colorectal cancer. Sci Rep. 2019;9:16497.
Xu R, Rai A, Chen M, Suwakulsiri W, Greening DW, Simpson RJ. Extracellular vesicles in cancer - implications for future improvements in cancer care. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2018;15:617–38.
Mathieu M, Martin-Jaular L, Lavieu G, Théry C. Specificities of secretion and uptake of exosomes and other extracellular vesicles for cell-to-cell communication. Nat Cell Biol. 2019;21:9–17.
Zhang H, Deng T, Liu R, Bai M, Zhou L, Wang X, et al. Exosome-delivered EGFR regulates liver microenvironment to promote gastric cancer liver metastasis. Nat Commun. 2017;8:15016.
Xie Y, Li J, Li P, Li N, Zhang Y, Binang H, et al. RNA-Seq profiling of serum Exosomal Circular RNAs reveals Circ-PNN as a potential biomarker for human colorectal cancer. Front Oncol. 2020;10:982.
Wang F, Wang J, Cao X, Xu L, Chen L. Hsa_circ_0014717 is downregulated in colorectal cancer and inhibits tumor growth by promoting p16 expression. Biomed Pharmacother. 2018;98:775–82.
Geng Y, Zheng X, Hu W, Wang Q, Xu Y, He W, et al. Hsa_circ_0009361 acts as the sponge of miR-582 to suppress colorectal cancer progression by regulating APC2 expression. Clin Sci (Lond). 2019;133:1197–213.
Li XN, Wang ZJ, Ye CX, Zhao BC, Huang XX, Yang L. Circular RNA circVAPA is up-regulated and exerts oncogenic properties by sponging miR-101 in colorectal cancer. Biomed Pharmacother. 2019;112:108611.
Zhang X, Xu Y, Yamaguchi K, Hu J, Zhang L, Wang J, et al. Circular RNA circVAPA knockdown suppresses colorectal cancer cell growth process by regulating miR-125a/CREB5 axis. Cancer Cell Int. 2020;20:103.
Zhao H, Chen S, Fu Q. Exosomes from CD133(+) cells carrying circ-ABCC1 mediate cell stemness and metastasis in colorectal cancer. J Cell Biochem. 2020;121:3286–97.
Lin J, Cai D, Li W, Yu T, Mao H, Jiang S, et al. Plasma circular RNA panel acts as a novel diagnostic biomarker for colorectal cancer. Clin Biochem. 2019;74:60–8.
Jin YD, Ren YR, Gao YX, Zhang L, Ding Z. Hsa_circ_0005075 predicts a poor prognosis and acts as an oncogene in colorectal cancer via activating Wnt/β-catenin pathway. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2019;23:3311–9.
Zhong D, Li P, Gong PY. Hsa_circ_0005075 promotes the proliferation and invasion of colorectal cancer cells. Int J Biol Markers. 2019;34:284–91.
Li Q, Wang Y, Wu S, Zhou Z, Ding X, Shi R, et al. CircACC1 regulates assembly and activation of AMPK complex under metabolic stress. Cell Metab. 2019;30:157–173.e157.
Zhang ZJ, Zhang YH, Qin XJ, Wang YX. Fu J: Circular RNA circDENND4C facilitates proliferation, migration and glycolysis of colorectal cancer cells through miR-760/GLUT1 axis. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2020;24:2387–400.
Ding DY, Wang D, Shu ZB. Hsa_circ_0007534 knockdown represses the development of colorectal cancer cells through regulating miR-613/SLC25A22 axis. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2020;24:3004–22.
Du J, Zhang L, Ma H, Wang Y, Wang P. Lidocaine suppresses cell proliferation and aerobic glycolysis by regulating circHOMER1/miR-138-5p/HEY1 Axis in colorectal cancer. Cancer Manag Res. 2020;12:5009–22.
Hu B, Xian Z, Zou Q, Zhang D, Su D, Yao J, et al. CircFAT1 suppresses colorectal cancer development through regulating miR-520b/UHRF1 Axis or miR-302c-3p/UHRF1 Axis. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2020.
Zhi X, Zhang J, Cheng Z, Bian L, Qin J. circLgr4 drives colorectal tumorigenesis and invasion through Lgr4-targeting peptide. Int J Cancer. 2019.
Zhan W, Liao X, Wang Y, Li L, Li J, Chen Z, et al. circCTIC1 promotes the self-renewal of colon TICs through BPTF-dependent c-Myc expression. Carcinogenesis. 2019;40:560–8.
Zheng X, Ma YF, Zhang XR, Li Y, Zhao HH, Han SG. Circ_0056618 promoted cell proliferation, migration and angiogenesis through sponging with miR-206 and upregulating CXCR4 and VEGF-A in colorectal cancer. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2020;24:4190–202.
Chen C, Huang Z, Mo X, Song Y, Li X, Li X, et al. The circular RNA 001971/miR-29c-3p axis modulates colorectal cancer growth, metastasis, and angiogenesis through VEGFA. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2020;39:91.
Li X, Wang J, Zhang C, Lin C, Zhang J, Zhang W, et al. Circular RNA circITGA7 inhibits colorectal cancer growth and metastasis by modulating the Ras pathway and upregulating transcription of its host gene ITGA7. J Pathol. 2018;246:166–79.
Yang G, Zhang T, Ye J, Yang J, Chen C, Cai S, et al. Circ-ITGA7 sponges miR-3187-3p to upregulate ASXL1, suppressing colorectal cancer proliferation. Cancer Manag Res. 2019;11:6499–509.
Cui W, Dai J, Ma J, Gu H. circCDYL/microRNA-105-5p participates in modulating growth and migration of colon cancer cells. Gen Physiol Biophys. 2019;38:485–95.
Wang J, Luo J, Liu G, Li X. Circular RNA hsa_circ_0008285 inhibits colorectal cancer cell proliferation and migration via the miR-382-5p/PTEN axis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2020;527:503–10.
Yuan Y, Liu W, Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Sun S. CircRNA circ_0026344 as a prognostic biomarker suppresses colorectal cancer progression via microRNA-21 and microRNA-31. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2018;503:870–5.
Shen T, Cheng X, Liu X, Xia C, Zhang H, Pan D, et al. Circ_0026344 restrains metastasis of human colorectal cancer cells via miR-183. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2019;47:4038–45.
Yang Z, Zhang J, Lu D, Sun Y, Zhao X, Wang X, et al. Hsa_circ_0137008 suppresses the malignant phenotype in colorectal cancer by acting as a microRNA-338-5p sponge. Cancer Cell Int. 2020;20:67.
Wu L, Xia J, Yang J, Shi Y, Xia H, Xiang X, et al. Circ-ZNF609 promotes migration of colorectal cancer by inhibiting Gli1 expression via microRNA-150. J buon. 2018;23:1343–9.
Zhang X, Zhao Y, Kong P, Han M, Li B. Expression of circZNF609 is Down-regulated in colorectal cancer tissue and promotes apoptosis in colorectal cancer cells by Upregulating p53. Med Sci Monit. 2019;25:5977–85.
Longley DB, Harkin DP, Johnston PG. 5-fluorouracil: mechanisms of action and clinical strategies. Nat Rev Cancer. 2003;3:330–8.
Meyerhardt JA, Mayer RJ. Systemic therapy for colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:476–87.
Hua X, Sun Y, Chen J, Wu Y, Sha J, Han S, et al. Circular RNAs in drug resistant tumors. Biomed Pharmacother. 2019;118:109233.
Chen H, Pei L, Xie P, Guo G. Circ-PRKDC contributes to 5-fluorouracil resistance of colorectal cancer cells by regulating miR-375/FOXM1 Axis and Wnt/β-catenin pathway. Onco Targets Ther. 2020;13:5939–53.
Jian X, He H, Zhu J, Zhang Q, Zheng Z, Liang X, et al. Hsa_circ_001680 affects the proliferation and migration of CRC and mediates its chemoresistance by regulating BMI1 through miR-340. Mol Cancer. 2020;19:20.
Ren TJ, Liu C, Hou JF, Shan FX. CircDDX17 reduces 5-fluorouracil resistance and hinders tumorigenesis in colorectal cancer by regulating miR-31-5p/KANK1 axis. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2020;24:1743–54.
Lin YC, Yu YS, Lin HH, Hsiao KY. Oxaliplatin-induced DHX9 phosphorylation promotes oncogenic Circular RNA CCDC66 expression and development of Chemoresistance. Cancers (Basel). 2020;12.
Lai M, Liu G, Li R, Bai H, Zhao J, Xiao P, et al. Hsa_circ_0079662 induces the resistance mechanism of the chemotherapy drug oxaliplatin through the TNF-α pathway in human colon cancer. J Cell Mol Med. 2020;24:5021–7.
Cantero-Muñoz P, Urién MA, Ruano-Ravina A. Efficacy and safety of intraoperative radiotherapy in colorectal cancer: a systematic review. Cancer Lett. 2011;306:121–33.
Thompson MK, Poortmans P, Chalmers AJ, Faivre-Finn C, Hall E, Huddart RA, et al. Practice-changing radiation therapy trials for the treatment of cancer: where are we 150 years after the birth of Marie curie? Br J Cancer. 2018;119:389–407.
Lu Q, Gong W, Wang J, Ji K, Wang Y, Xu C, et al. Identification of Circular RNAs altered in mouse jejuna after radiation. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2018;47:2558–68.
Huang X, Taeb S, Jahangiri S, Emmenegger U, Tran E, Bruce J, et al. miRNA-95 mediates radioresistance in tumors by targeting the sphingolipid phosphatase SGPP1. Cancer Res. 2013;73:6972–86.
Yang P, Yang Y, An W, Xu J, Zhang G, Jie J, et al. The long noncoding RNA-ROR promotes the resistance of radiotherapy for human colorectal cancer cells by targeting the p53/miR-145 pathway. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;32:837–45.
Li H, Jin X, Liu B, Zhang P, Chen W, Li Q. CircRNA CBL.11 suppresses cell proliferation by sponging miR-6778-5p in colorectal cancer. BMC Cancer. 2019;19:826.
Hsiao KY, Lin YC, Gupta SK, Chang N, Yen L, Sun HS, et al. Noncoding effects of Circular RNA CCDC66 promote colon cancer growth and metastasis. Cancer Res. 2017;77:2339–50.
Tu FL, Guo XQ, Wu HX, He ZY, Wang F, Sun AJ, et al. Circ-0001313/miRNA-510-5p/AKT2 axis promotes the development and progression of colon cancer. Am J Transl Res. 2020;12:281–91.
Wang L, Peng X, Lu X, Wei Q, Chen M, Liu L. Inhibition of hsa_circ_0001313 (circCCDC66) induction enhances the radio-sensitivity of colon cancer cells via tumor suppressor miR-338-3p: effects of cicr_0001313 on colon cancer radio-sensitivity. Pathol Res Pract. 2019;215:689–96.
Conn SJ, Pillman KA, Toubia J, Conn VM, Salmanidis M, Phillips CA, et al. The RNA binding protein quaking regulates formation of circRNAs. Cell. 2015;160:1125–34.
Errichelli L, Dini Modigliani S, Laneve P, Colantoni A, Legnini I, Capauto D, et al. FUS affects circular RNA expression in murine embryonic stem cell-derived motor neurons. Nat Commun. 2017;8:14741.
Yu CY, Li TC, Wu YY, Yeh CH, Chiang W, Chuang CY, et al. The circular RNA circBIRC6 participates in the molecular circuitry controlling human pluripotency. Nat Commun. 2017;8:1149.
Han K, Wang FW, Cao CH, Ling H, Chen JW, Chen RX, et al. CircLONP2 enhances colorectal carcinoma invasion and metastasis through modulating the maturation and exosomal dissemination of microRNA-17. Mol Cancer. 2020;19:60.
Ren C, Zhang Z, Wang S, Zhu W, Zheng P, Wang W. Circular RNA hsa_circ_0001178 facilitates the invasion and metastasis of colorectal cancer through upregulating ZEB1 via sponging multiple miRNAs. Biol Chem. 2020;401:487–96.
Shan K, Liu C, Liu BH, Chen X, Dong R, Liu X, et al. Circular noncoding RNA HIPK3 mediates retinal vascular dysfunction in diabetes mellitus. Circulation. 2017;136:1629–42.
Lee YH, Kim HS, Kim JS, Yu MK, Cho SD, Jeon JG, et al. C-myb regulates autophagy for pulp vitality in glucose oxidative stress. J Dent Res. 2016;95:430–8.
Aktaş T, Avşar Ilık İ, Maticzka D, Bhardwaj V, Pessoa Rodrigues C, Mittler G, et al. DHX9 suppresses RNA processing defects originating from the Alu invasion of the human genome. Nature. 2017;544:115–9.
Zhang XO, Wang HB, Zhang Y, Lu X, Chen LL, Yang L. Complementary sequence-mediated exon circularization. Cell. 2014;159:134–47.
Zhang Z, Li B, Xu P, Yang B. Integrated whole Transcriptome profiling and bioinformatics analysis for revealing regulatory pathways associated with Quercetin-induced apoptosis in HCT-116 cells. Front Pharmacol. 2019;10:798.
Chaudhary R, Muys BR, Grammatikakis I, De S, Abdelmohsen K, Li XL, et al. A Circular RNA from the MDM2 locus controls cell cycle progression by suppressing p53 levels. Mol Cell Biol. 2020;40:e00473.
Shi L, Tao C, Tang Y, Xia Y, Li X, Wang X. Hypoxia-induced hsa_circ_0000826 is linked to liver metastasis of colorectal cancer. J Clin Lab Anal. 2020;34:e23405.
Kramer MC, Liang D, Tatomer DC, Gold B, March ZM, Cherry S, et al. Combinatorial control of drosophila circular RNA expression by intronic repeats, hnRNPs, and SR proteins. Genes Dev. 2015;29:2168–82.
Kristensen LS, Andersen MS, Stagsted LVW, Ebbesen KK, Hansen TB, Kjems J. The biogenesis, biology and characterization of circular RNAs. Nat Rev Genet. 2019;20:675–91.
Thomson DW, Dinger ME. Endogenous microRNA sponges: evidence and controversy. Nat Rev Genet. 2016;17:272–83.
Denzler R, Agarwal V, Stefano J, Bartel DP, Stoffel M. Assessing the ceRNA hypothesis with quantitative measurements of miRNA and target abundance. Mol Cell. 2014;54:766–76.
Baek D, Villén J, Shin C, Camargo FD, Gygi SP, Bartel DP. The impact of microRNAs on protein output. Nature. 2008;455:64–71.
Friedman RC, Farh KK, Burge CB, Bartel DP. Most mammalian mRNAs are conserved targets of microRNAs. Genome Res. 2009, 19:92–105.
Wang X, Ren Y, Ma S, Wang S, Circular RNA. 0060745, a novel circRNA, promotes colorectal cancer cell proliferation and metastasis through miR-4736 sponging. Onco Targets Ther. 2020;13:1941–51.
Fang G, Ye BL, Hu BR, Ruan XJ, Shi YX. CircRNA_100290 promotes colorectal cancer progression through miR-516b-induced downregulation of FZD4 expression and Wnt/β-catenin signaling. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2018;504:184–9.
Jin Y, Yu LL, Zhang B, Liu CF, Chen Y. Circular RNA hsa_circ_0000523 regulates the proliferation and apoptosis of colorectal cancer cells as miRNA sponge. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2018;51:e7811.
Ma Z, Han C, Xia W, Wang S, Li X, Fang P, et al. circ5615 functions as a ceRNA to promote colorectal cancer progression by upregulating TNKS. Cell Death Dis. 2020;11:356.
Yang H, Li X, Meng Q, Sun H, Wu S, Hu W, et al. CircPTK2 (hsa_circ_0005273) as a novel therapeutic target for metastatic colorectal cancer. Mol Cancer. 2020;19:13.
Kidd ME, Shumaker DK, Ridge KM. The role of vimentin intermediate filaments in the progression of lung cancer. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2014;50:1–6.
Danielsson F, Peterson MK, Caldeira Araújo H, Lautenschläger F, Gad AKB. Vimentin diversity in health and disease. Cells. 2018;7.
Chen RX, Chen X, Xia LP, Zhang JX, Pan ZZ, Ma XD, et al. N(6)-methyladenosine modification of circNSUN2 facilitates cytoplasmic export and stabilizes HMGA2 to promote colorectal liver metastasis. Nat Commun. 2019;10:4695.
Degrauwe N, Suvà ML, Janiszewska M, Riggi N, Stamenkovic I. IMPs: an RNA-binding protein family that provides a link between stem cell maintenance in normal development and cancer. Genes Dev. 2016;30:2459–74.
Huang H, Weng H, Sun W, Qin X, Shi H, Wu H, et al. Recognition of RNA N(6)-methyladenosine by IGF2BP proteins enhances mRNA stability and translation. Nat Cell Biol. 2018;20:285–95.
Li Y, Zhao Z, Xu C, Zhou Z, Zhu Z, You T. HMGA2 induces transcription factor slug expression to promote epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and contributes to colon cancer progression. Cancer Lett. 2014;355:130–40.
Zeng Y, Du WW, Wu Y, Yang Z, Awan FM, Li X, et al. A Circular RNA binds to and activates AKT phosphorylation and nuclear localization reducing apoptosis and enhancing cardiac repair. Theranostics. 2017;7:3842–55.
Du WW, Yang W, Liu E, Yang Z, Dhaliwal P, Yang BB. Foxo3 circular RNA retards cell cycle progression via forming ternary complexes with p21 and CDK2. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:2846–58.
Hardie DG, Ross FA, Hawley SA. AMPK: a nutrient and energy sensor that maintains energy homeostasis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2012;13:251–62.
Marsin AS, Bertrand L, Rider MH, Deprez J, Beauloye C, Vincent MF, et al. Phosphorylation and activation of heart PFK-2 by AMPK has a role in the stimulation of glycolysis during ischaemia. Curr Biol. 2000;10:1247–55.
Marsin AS, Bouzin C, Bertrand L, Hue L. The stimulation of glycolysis by hypoxia in activated monocytes is mediated by AMP-activated protein kinase and inducible 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:30778–83.
Hardie DG, Pan DA. Regulation of fatty acid synthesis and oxidation by the AMP-activated protein kinase. Biochem Soc Trans. 2002;30:1064–70.
Crute BE, Seefeld K, Gamble J, Kemp BE, Witters LA. Functional domains of the alpha1 catalytic subunit of the AMP-activated protein kinase. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:35347–54.
Salatto CT, Miller RA, Cameron KO, Cokorinos E, Reyes A, Ward J, et al. Selective activation of AMPK β1-containing isoforms improves kidney function in a rat model of diabetic nephropathy. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2017;361:303–11.
Chen N, Zhao G, Yan X, Lv Z, Yin H, Zhang S, et al. A novel FLI1 exonic circular RNA promotes metastasis in breast cancer by coordinately regulating TET1 and DNMT1. Genome Biol. 2018;19:218.
You X, Vlatkovic I, Babic A, Will T, Epstein I, Tushev G, et al. Neural circular RNAs are derived from synaptic genes and regulated by development and plasticity. Nat Neurosci. 2015;18:603–10.
Stagsted LV, Nielsen KM, Daugaard I, Hansen TB. Noncoding AUG circRNAs constitute an abundant and conserved subclass of circles. Life Sci Alliance. 2019:2.
Pamudurti NR, Bartok O, Jens M, Ashwal-Fluss R, Stottmeister C, Ruhe L, et al. Translation of CircRNAs. Mol Cell. 2017;66:9–21.e27.
Yang Y, Fan X, Mao M, Song X, Wu P, Zhang Y, et al. Extensive translation of circular RNAs driven by N(6)-methyladenosine. Cell Res. 2017;27:626–41.
Yang Y, Gao X, Zhang M, Yan S, Sun C, Xiao F, et al. Novel role of FBXW7 Circular RNA in repressing Glioma tumorigenesis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018;110:304–15.
Zhang M, Huang N, Yang X, Luo J, Yan S, Xiao F, et al. A novel protein encoded by the circular form of the SHPRH gene suppresses glioma tumorigenesis. Oncogene. 2018;37:1805–14.
Zhang M, Zhao K, Xu X, Yang Y, Yan S, Wei P, et al. A peptide encoded by circular form of LINC-PINT suppresses oncogenic transcriptional elongation in glioblastoma. Nat Commun. 2018;9:4475.
Lei M, Zheng G, Ning Q, Zheng J, Dong D. Translation and functional roles of circular RNAs in human cancer. Mol Cancer. 2020;19:30.
Chen X, Han P, Zhou T, Guo X, Song X, Li Y. circRNADb: a comprehensive database for human circular RNAs with protein-coding annotations. Sci Rep. 2016;6:34985.
Zheng X, Chen L, Zhou Y, Wang Q, Zheng Z, Xu B, et al. A novel protein encoded by a circular RNA circPPP1R12A promotes tumor pathogenesis and metastasis of colon cancer via hippo-YAP signaling. Mol Cancer. 2019;18:47.
Min L, Wang H, Zeng Y. CircRNA_104916 regulates migration, apoptosis and epithelial-mesenchymal transition in colon cancer cells. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed). 2019;24:819–32.
He C, Huang C, Zhou R. Yu H: CircLMNB1 promotes colorectal cancer by regulating cell proliferation, apoptosis and epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Onco Targets Ther. 2019;12:6349–59.
Wang DK, Chong RF, Song BL, Fan KF, Liu YF. Circular RNA circ-SMAD7 is downregulated in colorectal cancer and suppresses tumor metastasis by regulating epithelial mesenchymal transition. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2020;24:1736–42.
Li YF, Pei FL, Cao MZ. CircRNA_101951 promotes migration and invasion of colorectal cancer cells by regulating the KIF3A-mediated EMT pathway. Exp Ther Med. 2020;19:3355–61.
Ge Z, Li LF, Wang CY, Wang Y, Ma WL. CircMTO1 inhibits cell proliferation and invasion by regulating Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway in colorectal cancer. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2018;22:8203–9.
Cao JZ, Ma LM, Zhang YL, Guo HC, Niu X, Zhao TB. Circ-0104631 promotes cell proliferation and invasion in colorectal cancer and predicts poor prognosis. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2019;23:4730–7.
Lu H, Yao B, Wen X, Jia B. FBXW7 circular RNA regulates proliferation, migration and invasion of colorectal carcinoma through NEK2, mTOR, and PTEN signaling pathways in vitro and in vivo. BMC Cancer. 2019;19:918.
Tang W, Ji M, He G, Yang L, Niu Z, Jian M, et al. Silencing CDR1as inhibits colorectal cancer progression through regulating microRNA-7. Onco Targets Ther. 2017;10:2045–56.
Deng Z, Li X, Wang H, Geng Y, Cai Y, Tang Y, et al. Dysregulation of CircRNA_0001946 contributes to the proliferation and metastasis of colorectal cancer cells by targeting MicroRNA-135a-5p. Front Genet. 2020;11:357.
Tanaka E, Miyakawa Y, Kishikawa T, Seimiya T, Iwata T, Funato K, et al. Expression of circular RNA CDR1-AS in colon cancer cells increases cell surface PD-L1 protein levels. Oncol Rep. 2019;42:1459–66.
Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology. 1982;143:29–36.
Zhu M, Dang Y, Yang Z, Liu Y, Zhang L, Xu Y, et al. Comprehensive RNA sequencing in adenoma-cancer transition identified predictive biomarkers and therapeutic targets of human CRC. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2020;20:25–33.
Xiao YS, Tong HZ, Yuan XH, Xiong CH, Xu XY, Zeng YF. CircFADS2: a potential prognostic biomarker of colorectal cancer. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2020;245:1233–41.
Chen Z, Ren R, Wan D, Wang Y, Xue X, Jiang M, et al. Hsa_circ_101555 functions as a competing endogenous RNA of miR-597-5p to promote colorectal cancer progression. Oncogene. 2019;38:6017–34.
Li Y, Li C, Xu R, Wang Y, Li D, Zhang B. A novel circFMN2 promotes tumor proliferation in CRC by regulating the miR-1182/hTERT signaling pathways. Clin Sci (Lond). 2019;133:2463–79.
Li J, Sun D, Pu W, Wang J, Peng Y. Circular RNAs in cancer: biogenesis, function, and clinical significance. Trends Cancer. 2020;6:319–36.
Lu C, Jiang W, Hui B, Rong D, Fu K, Dong C, et al. The circ_0021977/miR-10b-5p/P21 and P53 regulatory axis suppresses proliferation, migration, and invasion in colorectal cancer. J Cell Physiol. 2020;235:2273–85.
Zhang J, Zhang X, Li C, Yue L, Ding N, Riordan T, et al. Circular RNA profiling provides insights into their subcellular distribution and molecular characteristics in HepG2 cells. RNA Biol. 2019;16:220–32.
Wan Y, Hopper AK. Size matters: conserved proteins function in length-dependent nuclear export of circular RNAs. Genes Dev. 2018;32:600–1.
Li Z, Kearse MG, Huang C. The nuclear export of circular RNAs is primarily defined by their length. RNA Biol. 2019;16:1–4.
Schumann S, Jackson BR, Yule I, Whitehead SK, Revill C, Foster R, et al. Targeting the ATP-dependent formation of herpesvirus ribonucleoprotein particle assembly as an antiviral approach. Nat Microbiol. 2016;2:16201.
Azmi AS, Mohammad RM. Targeting cancer at the nuclear pore. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:4180–2.
Zhou M, Xiao MS, Li Z, Huang C. New progresses of circular RNA biology: from nuclear export to degradation. RNA Biol. 2020:1–9.
Yu T, Wang Y, Fan Y, Fang N, Wang T, Xu T, et al. CircRNAs in cancer metabolism: a review. J Hematol Oncol. 2019;12:90.
Huang M, Peng X, Yang L, Yang S, Li X, Tang S, et al. Non-coding RNA derived from extracellular vesicles in cancer immune escape: biological functions and potential clinical applications. Cancer Lett. 2020.
Ma Z, Shuai Y, Gao X, Wen X, Ji J. Circular RNAs in the tumour microenvironment. Mol Cancer. 2020;19:8.
Zhang Q, Wang W, Zhou Q, Chen C, Yuan W, Liu J, et al. Roles of circRNAs in the tumour microenvironment. Mol Cancer. 2020;19:14.
Cui C, Yang J, Li X, Liu D, Fu L, Wang X. Functions and mechanisms of circular RNAs in cancer radiotherapy and chemotherapy resistance. Mol Cancer. 2020;19:58.
Li HM, Ma XL, Li HG. Intriguing circles: conflicts and controversies in circular RNA research. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA. 2019;10:e1538.
Kristensen LS, Okholm TLH, Venø MT, Kjems J. Circular RNAs are abundantly expressed and upregulated during human epidermal stem cell differentiation. RNA Biol. 2018;15:280–91.
Liu Y, Li Z, Zhang M, Zhou H, Wu X, Zhong J, et al. Rolling-translated EGFR variants sustain EGFR signaling and promote Glioblastoma Tumorigenicity. Neuro-Oncology. 2020;1:noaa279.
Wu P, Mo Y, Peng M, Tang T, Zhong Y, Deng X, et al. Emerging role of tumor-related functional peptides encoded by lncRNA and circRNA. Mol Cancer. 2020;19:22.
Liu X, Abraham JM, Cheng Y, Wang Z, Wang Z, Zhang G, et al. Synthetic Circular RNA functions as a miR-21 sponge to suppress gastric carcinoma cell proliferation. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2018;13:312–21.
Wang Z, Ma K, Cheng Y, Abraham JM, Liu X, Ke X, et al. Synthetic circular multi-miR sponge simultaneously inhibits miR-21 and miR-93 in esophageal carcinoma. Lab Investig. 2019;99:1442–53.
Schreiner S, Didio A, Hung LH, Bindereif A. Design and application of circular RNAs with protein-sponge function. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48:12326–35.
Li F, Yang Q, He AT, Yang BB. Circular RNAs in cancer: limitations in functional studies and diagnostic potential. Semin Cancer Biol. 2020.
Fan X, Zhang X, Wu X, Guo H, Hu Y, Tang F, et al. Single-cell RNA-seq transcriptome analysis of linear and circular RNAs in mouse preimplantation embryos. Genome Biol. 2015;16:148.
Verboom K, Everaert C, Bolduc N, Livak KJ, Yigit N, Rombaut D, et al. SMARTer single cell total RNA sequencing. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:e93.
Kristensen LS, Ebbesen KK, Sokol M, Jakobsen T, Korsgaard U, Eriksen AC, et al. Spatial expression analyses of the putative oncogene ciRS-7 in cancer reshape the microRNA sponge theory. Nat Commun. 2020;11:4551.
Amaria RN, Reddy SM, Tawbi HA, Davies MA, Ross MI, Glitza IC, et al. Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade in high-risk resectable melanoma. Nat Med. 2018;24:1649–54.
Blank CU, Rozeman EA, Fanchi LF, Sikorska K, van de Wiel B, Kvistborg P, et al. Neoadjuvant versus adjuvant ipilimumab plus nivolumab in macroscopic stage III melanoma. Nat Med. 2018;24:1655–61.
Jain M, Koren S, Miga KH, Quick J, Rand AC, Sasani TA, et al. Nanopore sequencing and assembly of a human genome with ultra-long reads. Nat Biotechnol. 2018;36:338–45.
Chuang TJ, Chen YJ, Chen CY, Mai TL, Wang YD, Yeh CS, et al. Integrative transcriptome sequencing reveals extensive alternative trans-splicing and cis-backsplicing in human cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46:3671–91.
Li S, Li X, Xue W, Zhang L, Yang LZ, Cao SM, et al. Screening for functional circular RNAs using the CRISPR-Cas13 system. Nat Methods. 2020;18(1):51.
Koch L. CRISPR-Cas13 targets circRNAs. Nat Rev Genet. 2020;22(2):68.
Humphreys DT, Fossat N, Demuth M, Tam PPL, Ho JWK. Ularcirc: visualization and enhanced analysis of circular RNAs via back and canonical forward splicing. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:e123.
Wang L, You ZH, Li JQ, Huang YA. IMS-CDA: prediction of CircRNA-disease associations from the integration of multisource similarity information with deep stacked autoencoder model. IEEE Trans Cybern. 2020.
Gao Y, Shang S, Guo S, Li X, Zhou H, Liu H, et al. Lnc2Cancer 3.0: an updated resource for experimentally supported lncRNA/circRNA cancer associations and web tools based on RNA-seq and scRNA-seq data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;49(D1):D1251.
Gao Y, Li X, Shang S, Guo S, Wang P, Sun D, et al. LincSNP 3.0: an updated database for linking functional variants to human long non-coding RNAs, circular RNAs and their regulatory elements. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;49(D1):D1244.
Yuan W, Peng S, Wang J, Wei C, Ye Z, Wang Y, et al. Identification and characterization of circRNAs as competing endogenous RNAs for miRNA-mRNA in colorectal cancer. Peer J. 2019;7:e7602.
Ge J, Jin Y, Lv X, Liao Q, Luo C, Ye G, et al. Expression profiles of circular RNAs in human colorectal cancer based on RNA deep sequencing. J Clin Lab Anal. 2019;33:e22952.
Li XN, Wang ZJ, Ye CX, Zhao BC, Li ZL, Yang Y. RNA sequencing reveals the expression profiles of circRNA and indicates that circDDX17 acts as a tumor suppressor in colorectal cancer. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2018;37:325.
Zhang Z, Song N, Wang Y, Zhong J, Gu T, Yang L, et al. Analysis of differentially expressed circular RNAs for the identification of a coexpression RNA network and signature in colorectal cancer. J Cell Biochem. 2019;120:6409–19.
Bachmayr-Heyda A, Reiner AT, Auer K, Sukhbaatar N, Aust S, Bachleitner-Hofmann T, et al. Correlation of circular RNA abundance with proliferation--exemplified with colorectal and ovarian cancer, idiopathic lung fibrosis, and normal human tissues. Sci Rep. 2015;5:8057.
Zhu CL, Sha X, Wang Y, Li J, Zhang MY, Guo ZY, et al. Circular RNA hsa_circ_0007142 is Upregulated and targets miR-103a-2-5p in colorectal cancer. J Oncol. 2019;2019:9836819.
Zhang J, Liu H, Zhao P, Zhou H, Mao T. Has_circ_0055625 from circRNA profile increases colon cancer cell growth by sponging miR-106b-5p. J Cell Biochem. 2019;120:3027–37.
Chen S, Zhang L, Su Y, Zhang X. Screening potential biomarkers for colorectal cancer based on circular RNA chips. Oncol Rep. 2018;39:2499–512.
Zhu M, Xu Y, Chen Y, Yan F. Circular BANP, an upregulated circular RNA that modulates cell proliferation in colorectal cancer. Biomed Pharmacother. 2017;88:138–44.
Guo JN, Li J, Zhu CL, Feng WT, Shao JX, Wan L, et al. Comprehensive profile of differentially expressed circular RNAs reveals that hsa_circ_0000069 is upregulated and promotes cell proliferation, migration, and invasion in colorectal cancer. Onco Targets Ther. 2016;9:7451–8.
Xu D, Wu Y, Wang X, Hu X, Qin W, Li Y, et al. Identification of functional circRNA/miRNA/mRNA regulatory network for exploring prospective therapy strategy of colorectal cancer. J Cell Biochem. 2020.
Liu K, Guo Y, Zheng K, Zou C, Wu H, Wang S, et al. Identification of the circRNA-miRNA-mRNA regulatory network of Hsp90 inhibitor-induced cell death in colorectal cancer by integrated analysis. Gene. 2020;727:144232.
Chen HY, Li XN, Ye CX, Chen ZL, Wang ZJ, Circular RNA. circHUWE1 is Upregulated and promotes cell proliferation, migration and invasion in colorectal cancer by sponging miR-486. Onco Targets Ther. 2020;13:423–34.
Li Y, Zang H, Zhang X, Huang G. circ_0136666 facilitates the progression of colorectal cancer via miR-383/CREB1 Axis. Cancer Manag Res. 2020;12:6795–806.
Wang X, Chen Y, Liu W, Liu T, Sun D. Hsa_circ_0128846 promotes tumorigenesis of colorectal cancer by sponging hsa-miR-1184 and releasing AJUBA and inactivating hippo/YAP signalling. J Cell Mol Med. 2020;24:9908–24.
Lu X, Yu Y, Liao F, Tan S. Homo sapiens Circular RNA 0079993 (hsa_circ_0079993) of the POLR2J4 gene acts as an oncogene in colorectal cancer through the microRNA-203a-3p.1 and CREB1 Axis. Med Sci Monit. 2019;25:6872–83.
Chen P, Yao Y, Yang N, Gong L, Kong Y, Wu A. Circular RNA circCTNNA1 promotes colorectal cancer progression by sponging miR-149-5p and regulating FOXM1 expression. Cell Death Dis. 2020;11:557.
Bian L, Zhi X, Ma L, Zhang J, Chen P, Sun S, et al. Hsa_circRNA_103809 regulated the cell proliferation and migration in colorectal cancer via miR-532-3p / FOXO4 axis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2018;505:346–52.
Yong W, Zhuoqi X, Baocheng W, Dongsheng Z, Chuan Z, Yueming S. Hsa_circ_0071589 promotes carcinogenesis via the miR-600/EZH2 axis in colorectal cancer. Biomed Pharmacother. 2018;102:1188–94.
Shang A, Gu C, Wang W, Wang X, Sun J, Zeng B, et al. Exosomal circPACRGL promotes progression of colorectal cancer via the miR-142-3p/miR-506-3p- TGF-β1 axis. Mol Cancer. 2020;19:117.
Zhang L, Dong X, Yan B, Yu W, Shan L. CircAGFG1 drives metastasis and stemness in colorectal cancer by modulating YY1/CTNNB1. Cell Death Dis. 2020;11:542.
Xiao H, Liu M. Circular RNA hsa_circ_0053277 promotes the development of colorectal cancer by upregulating matrix metallopeptidase 14 via miR-2467-3p sequestration. J Cell Physiol. 2020;235:2881–90.
Li C, Zhou H. Circular RNA hsa_circRNA_102209 promotes the growth and metastasis of colorectal cancer through miR-761-mediated Ras and Rab interactor 1 signaling. Cancer Med. 2020;9:6710–25.
Li Z, Yao H, Wang S, Li G, Gu X. CircTADA2A suppresses the progression of colorectal cancer via miR-374a-3p/KLF14 axis. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2020;39:160.
Yang B, Du K, Yang C, Xiang L, Xu Y, Cao C, et al. CircPRMT5 circular RNA promotes proliferation of colorectal cancer through sponging miR-377 to induce E2F3 expression. J Cell Mol Med. 2020;24:3431–7.
Zhang J, Wang H, Wu K, Zhan F, Zeng H. Dysregulated circRNA_100876 contributes to proliferation and metastasis of colorectal cancer by targeting microRNA-516b (miR-516b). Cancer Biol Ther. 2020;21:733–40.
Zhang XL, Xu LL, Wang F. Hsa_circ_0020397 regulates colorectal cancer cell viability, apoptosis and invasion by promoting the expression of the miR-138 targets TERT and PD-L1. Cell Biol Int. 2017;41:1056–64.
Zhang Q, Zhang C, Ma JX, Ren H, Sun Y, Xu JZ. Circular RNA PIP5K1A promotes colon cancer development through inhibiting miR-1273a. World J Gastroenterol. 2019;25:5300–9.
Yang H, Zhang H, Yang Y, Wang X, Deng T, Liu R, et al. Hypoxia induced exosomal circRNA promotes metastasis of colorectal cancer via targeting GEF-H1/RhoA axis. Theranostics. 2020;10:8211–26.
Xian ZY, Hu B, Wang T, Cai JL, Zeng JY, Zou Q, et al. CircABCB10 silencing inhibits the cell ferroptosis and apoptosis by regulating the miR-326/CCL5 axis in rectal cancer. Neoplasma. 2020;67:1063–73.
Tang X, Sun G, He Q, Wang C, Shi J, Gao L, et al. Circular noncoding RNA circMBOAT2 is a novel tumor marker and regulates proliferation/migration by sponging miR-519d-3p in colorectal cancer. Cell Death Dis. 2020;11:625.
He JH, Li YG, Han ZP, Zhou JB, Chen WM, Lv YB, et al. The CircRNA-ACAP2/Hsa-miR-21-5p/ Tiam1 regulatory feedback circuit affects the proliferation, migration, and invasion of colon cancer SW480 cells. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2018;49:1539–50.
Li D, Yang R, Yang L, Wang D, Zhou X, Sun Y. circANKS1B regulates FOXM1 expression and promotes cell migration and invasion by functioning as a sponge of the miR-149 in colorectal cancer. Onco Targets Ther. 2019;12:4065–73.
Yin W, Xu J, Li C, Dai X, Wu T, Wen J. Circular RNA circ_0007142 facilitates colorectal cancer progression by modulating CDC25A expression via miR-122-5p. Onco Targets Ther. 2020;13:3689–701.
Li W, Xu Y, Wang X, Cao G, Bu W, Wang X, et al. circCCT3 modulates vascular endothelial growth factor a and Wnt signaling to enhance colorectal cancer metastasis through sponging miR-613. DNA Cell Biol. 2020;39:118–25.
Yang L, Sun H, Liu X, Chen J, Tian Z, Xu J, et al. Circular RNA hsa_circ_0004277 contributes to malignant phenotype of colorectal cancer by sponging miR-512-5p to upregulate the expression of PTMA. J Cell Physiol. 2020.
Li R, Wu B, Xia J, Ye L, Yang X. Circular RNA hsa_circRNA_102958 promotes tumorigenesis of colorectal cancer via miR-585/CDC25B axis. Cancer Manag Res. 2019;11:6887–93.
Chen MS, Lin CH, Huang LY, Qiu XM. CircRNA SMARCC1 sponges MiR-140-3p to regulate cell progression in colorectal cancer. Cancer Manag Res. 2020;12:4899–910.
Chen ZL, Li XN, Ye CX, Chen HY, Wang ZJ. Elevated levels of circRUNX1 in colorectal cancer promote cell growth and metastasis via miR-145-5p/IGF1 Signalling. Onco Targets Ther. 2020;13:4035–48.
Dai J, Zhuang Y, Tang M, Qian Q, Chen JP. CircRNA UBAP2 facilitates the progression of colorectal cancer by regulating miR-199a/VEGFA pathway. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2020;24:7963–71.
Wang Z, Su M, Xiang B, Zhao K, Qin B. Circular RNA PVT1 promotes metastasis via miR-145 sponging in CRC. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2019;512:716–22.
Sun J, Liu J, Zhu Q, Xu F, Kang L, Shi X. Hsa_circ_0001806 acts as a ceRNA to facilitate the Stemness of colorectal cancer cells by increasing COL1A1. Onco Targets Ther. 2020;13:6315–27.
Miao X, Xi Z, Zhang Y, Li Z, Huang L, Xin T, et al. Circ-SMARCA5 suppresses colorectal cancer progression via downregulating miR-39-3p and upregulating ARID4B. Dig Liver Dis. 2020;52:1494–502.
Zhang Y, Zhang Z, Yi Y, Wang Y, Fu J. CircNOL10 acts as a sponge of miR-135a/b-5p in suppressing colorectal cancer progression via regulating KLF9. Onco Targets Ther. 2020;13:5165–76.
Lu C, Fu L, Qian X, Dou L, Cang S. Knockdown of circular RNA circ-FARSA restricts colorectal cancer cell growth through regulation of miR-330-5p/LASP1 axis. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2020;689:108434.
Wang L, Wu H, Chu F, Zhang L, Xiao X. Knockdown of circ_0000512 inhibits cell proliferation and promotes apoptosis in colorectal cancer by regulating miR-296-5p/RUNX1 Axis. Onco Targets Ther. 2020;13:7357–68.
Liu J, Zhang J, Wang Z, Xi J, Bai L, Zhang Y. Knockdown of circAPLP2 inhibits progression of colorectal cancer by regulating miR-485-5p/FOXK1 Axis. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2020.
Wu HB, Huang SS, Lu CG, Tian SD, Chen M. CircAPLP2 regulates the proliferation and metastasis of colorectal cancer by targeting miR-101-3p to activate the notch signalling pathway. Am J Transl Res. 2020;12:2554–69.
Pei FL, Cao MZ, Li YF. Circ_0000218 plays a carcinogenic role in colorectal cancer progression by regulating miR-139-3p/RAB1A axis. J Biochem. 2020;167:55–65.
Huang G, Zhu H, Shi Y, Wu W, Cai H, Chen X. Cir-ITCH plays an inhibitory role in colorectal cancer by regulating the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0131225.
Ji W, Qiu C, Wang M, Mao N, Wu S, Dai Y. Hsa_circ_0001649: a circular RNA and potential novel biomarker for colorectal cancer. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2018;497:122–6.
Li J, Ni S, Zhou C, Ye M. The expression profile and clinical application potential of hsa_circ_0000711 in colorectal cancer. Cancer Manag Res. 2018;10:2777–84.
Wang J, Li X, Lu L, He L, Hu H, Xu Z. Circular RNA hsa_circ_0000567 can be used as a promising diagnostic biomarker for human colorectal cancer. J Clin Lab Anal. 2018;32:e22379.
Ruan H, Deng X, Dong L, Yang D, Xu Y, Peng H, et al. Circular RNA circ_0002138 is down-regulated and suppresses cell proliferation in colorectal cancer. Biomed Pharmacother. 2019;111:1022–8.
We thank the following organizations for their support: the Hunan Abdominal Surgery Clinical Medical Research Center and the Intestinal Obstruction Research Center of Central South University.
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81602568 and No. 81773130), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2018 M643009), and National Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province (No. 2018JJ2599, No. 2019JJ50906 and No. 2019JJ80030).
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Consent for publication
All authors agreed on the contents of the manuscript.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Network of circRNA-miRNA-mRNA interactions in colorectal cancer.
Network of circRNA-miRNA-mRNA interactions in colorectal cancer.
About this article
Cite this article
Long, F., Lin, Z., Li, L. et al. Comprehensive landscape and future perspectives of circular RNAs in colorectal cancer. Mol Cancer 20, 26 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12943-021-01318-6