Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Short communication
  • Open Access

Inactivation of the von Hippel-Lindau tumour suppressor gene induces Neuromedin U expression in renal cancer cells

  • 1, 3Email author,
  • 2,
  • 1,
  • 1 and
  • 1
Molecular Cancer201110:89

https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-4598-10-89

  • Received: 4 January 2011
  • Accepted: 26 July 2011
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

209 000 new cases of renal carcinoma are diagnosed each year worldwide and new therapeutic targets are urgently required. The great majority of clear cell renal cancer involves inactivation of VHL, which acts as a gatekeeper tumour suppressor gene in renal epithelial cells. However how VHL exerts its tumour suppressor function remains unclear. A gene expression microarray comparing RCC10 renal cancer cells expressing either VHL or an empty vector was used to identify novel VHL regulated genes.

Findings

NMU (Neuromedin U) is a neuropeptide that has been implicated in energy homeostasis and tumour progression. Here we show for the first time that VHL loss-of-function results in dramatic upregulation of NMU expression in renal cancer cells. The effect of VHL inactivation was found to be mediated via activation of Hypoxia Inducible Factor (HIF). Exposure of VHL expressing RCC cells to either hypoxia or dimethyloxalylglycine resulted in HIF activation and increased NMU expression. Conversely, suppression of HIF in VHL defective RCC cells via siRNA of HIF-α subunits or expression of Type 2C mutant VHL s reduced NMU expression levels. We also show that renal cancer cells express a functional NMU receptor (NMUR1), and that NMU stimulates migration of renal cancer cells.

Conclusions

These findings suggest that NMU may act in an autocrine fashion, promoting progression of kidney cancer. Hypoxia and HIF expression are frequently observed in many non-renal cancers and are associated with a poor prognosis. Our study raises the possibility that HIF may also drive NMU expression in non-renal tumours.

Keywords

  • Hypoxia Inducible Factor
  • Renal Cancer Cell
  • Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
  • Hypoxia Response Element
  • RCC10 Cell

Findings

Kidney cancer is responsible for 102 000 deaths per year worldwide and prognosis is generally poor [1]. Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC) is the commonest form of kidney cancer and the von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) tumour suppressor gene is mutated or inactivated in the vast majority of these tumours [2]. Mutations in VHL also underlie the familial renal cancer syndrome VHL disease [3]. In addition to CCRCCs, patients with VHL disease are also predisposed to phaeochromocytomas, haemangioblastomas of the central nervous system and retina and cysts affecting a variety of organs including the kidney and pancreas [2]. Although much has been learnt about VHL in recent years, its tumour suppressor function is still not fully understood.

There has been considerable success in developing new treatments for CCRCC that target aspects of the pathways related to loss of VHL function [1]. As a strategy to identify further potential targets, we examined the effect of re-expressing VHL in RCC10 renal cancer cells [4]. This cell background is attractive because re-expression of VHL alone restores many aspects of normal epithelial cell behaviour, including formation of tight junctions [5, 6], adherens junctions [7, 8] and a primary cilium [911]. Three separate pools of RCC10 VHL defective CCRCC cells were transduced with retroviruses expressing wild-type VHL; in parallel three pools were transduced with an empty vector. A substantial number of genes showed highly significant differences in expression, including many known to be modulated by VHL status (Figure 1A).
Figure 1
Figure 1

VHL regulates expression of Neuromedin U. A) RCC10 retroviral cell pools infected with empty vector or expressing wild-type VHL were prepared as described previously [7]. Cells were cultured for 48 hours and RNA expression analysed using an Affymetrix U133 Plus 2.0 human gene expression array. Microarray analysis identified differentially expressed genes by comparing expression levels in VHL defective cells to expression in VHL expressing cells. The five most highly upregulated and down-regulated genes, including NMU are listed in 1a. B) Protein lysates were prepared from VHL defective RCC10 and RCC4 cell lines and sub-lines stably expressing VHL and samples run on a SDS Page gel. Membranes were probed with HIF-1α (BD, San Diego, CA), HIF-2α (Novus Biologicals, Littleton, CO) and α-tubulin (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). In the absence of VHL both HIF-1α and HIF-2α are clearly detected, however in the presence of VHL levels of both HIF-1α and HIF-2α are suppressed. Equal levels of α-tubulin confirm equivalent loading. C) Real-time RT PCR analysis for NMU and the HIF target gene PHD3 was performed using SYBR-Green PCR Master Mix (Abgene, Epsom, United Kingdom). Data presented here has been normalised to expression of β-actin. Cell lines expressing VHL show marked suppression of NMU and PHD3 compared to VHL defective cell lines (*p < 0.01, using student's T test). (Primers: NMU For: 5'-CCTCAAGGATTACAGCCTG-3', NMU Rev: 5'-GTTCCTGAGGCTTTGGTAG-3; PHD3 For F 5'-GATGCTGAAGAAAGGGC-3', PHD3 Rev R 5'- CTGGCAAAGAGAGTATCTG-3'; β-actin For 5'-CCCAGAGCAAGAGAGAGG-3', β-actin Rev 5'-GTCCAGACGCAGGATG-3').

The neuropeptide Neuromedin U (NMU) was selected as being of particular interest for the following reasons. First, it was amongst the most highly regulated genes and has not previously been identified as modulated by VHL. Second, it acts on two identified G-protein coupled receptors making it potentially pharmacologically tractable [12]. Third, it has been implicated in autocrine growth and epithelial to mesenchymal transition in cancer [13]. Fourth, as a secreted peptide NMU may offer potential as a circulating or urinary biomarker in CCRCC. Recently Ketterer et al. showed that serum levels of NMU decrease following pancreas resection of pancreatic cancer patients [14].

NMU is a potent neuropeptide which was originally discovered in the 1980's. In humans NMU gives rise to a biologically active icosapentapeptide (NMU-25); function is dependent on a highly conserved C terminal sequence which is subject to enzymatic amidation. Several biological functions have been ascribed to NMU including regulation of smooth muscle contraction, blood pressure and local blood flow, ion transport in the gut, stress responses, gastric acid secretion, nociception and feeding behaviour [12, 15, 16].

To confirm the effect of VHL status on NMU expression that we observed on microarray analysis of retrovirally transduced pools of RCC10 cells, we next examined NMU expression in RCC10 cells and a subline stably expressing wild-type VHL (RCC10/VHL). We also examined a second VHL defective renal cancer cell line and subline expressing VHL derived from a different patient (RCC4 and RCC4/VHL). As expected, VHL suppressed HIF-α protein levels (Figure 1B) and mRNA expression of the HIF target gene PHD3 (Figure 1C) in both cell backgrounds. Real time RT-PCR analysis showed NMU mRNA expression was markedly increased in the absence of functioning VHL in both RCC10 and RCC4 cells (Figure 1C).

Several different biochemical functions have been reported for VHL including regulation of microtubule stability, cell differentiation, cell motility, extracellular matrix assembly, JunB and atypical isoforms of protein kinase C [2]. However the most extensively studied function of VHL is regulation of HIF [17]. HIF is comprised of a constitutively active β subunit and an oxygen-regulated α subunit. In the presence of oxygen the α-subunit is hydroxylated by a group of prolyl hydroxylase domain (PHD) enzymes, leading to capture by VHL, ubiquitination and proteosomal destruction [1719]. In hypoxia (or if VHL is inactivated) HIF α is stabilised. HIF is a master regulator of oxygen homeostasis and drives the transcriptional upregulation of >100 genes involved in processes such as glucose transport, glycolysis and angiogenesis, which collectively allow the adaption of the cells, tissues and organisms to low oxygenation [2, 17, 18].

To investigate whether activation of HIF mediates the high expression of NMU we exposed RCC10 cells stably expressing VHL to hypoxia as a means of activating HIF. Exposure of RCC10/VHL cells to hypoxia for 48 hrs resulted in a significant increase in mRNA levels of NMU compared to normoxic cultures (Figure 2). In a second approach, we activated HIF in the presence of VHL, using dimethyloxalylglycine (DMOG), a cell permeable 2-oxyglutarate-dependent dioxygenase inhibitor which inhibits the PHD enzymes. Treatment with DMOG resulted in a striking induction of both NMU mRNA compared to untreated cells (Figure 2). These results would be consistent with HIF activation mediating increased NMU expression in VHL defective CCRCC cells.
Figure 2
Figure 2

Neuromedin U is upregulated by hypoxia and DMOG in VHL expressing CCRCC cell lines. RCC10/VHL and RCC4/VHL cell were exposed to either 1% hypoxia in a hypoxic Galaxy R incubator (Biotech, Palo Alto, CA) or 1 mM dimethyl-oxalylglycine (DMOG; Frontier Bioscientific, Logan, UT) for 48 hours. Western analysis showed marked upregulation of both HIF-1α and HIF-2α in treated cell lines. Levels of NMU and the HIF target gene PHD3 were found to be significantly upregulated using real-time RT PCR analysis (* p < 0.01 using Student's t test).

To further investigate the ability of HIF to mediate NMU expression we studied the effect of VHL missense mutants, L188V and V84L. These single amino acid substitutions are associated clinically with phaeochromocytoma, but not with other tumours (type 2C VHL disease) and retain the ability to regulate HIF [20]. Analysis by real time RT-PCR showed a marked mRNA suppression of NMU in cell pools expressing either wild type VHL or type 2C mutant VHL, in both RCC10 and RCC4 cells (Figure 3A). The concordance between the ability of VHL mutants to suppress both HIF and NMU levels supports the notion that HIF activation underlies the VHL defective phenotype. Next we used a direct genetic approach to determine the role of HIF. RCC10 and RCC4 VHL defective cells were transfected with previously validated siRNAs to selectively suppress either HIF-1α or HIF-2α, or with a control siRNA. Knock-down of either HIF-α isoform resulted in decreased expression of NMU in both cell backgrounds (Figure 3B). Taken together these findings provide strong evidence that VHL regulates NMU expression in renal cancer cells via HIF.
Figure 3
Figure 3

Suppression of HIF-α subunits in RCC10 and RCC4 CCRCC cell lines decreases NMU expression. A) VHL Type 2C mutants suppress HIF and NMU: Retroviral RCC10 and RCC4 cell pools expressing either wild-type VHL (VHL 30), a type 2C mutant VHL (either VHL L188V or VHL V84L) or an empty vector were prepared as described previously [7]. Expression of VHL was confirmed by Western blotting. Analysis of HIF-α subunit expression showed that levels of both HIF-1α and HIF-2α were suppressed in cell pools expressing either wild-type VHL or type 2C mutant VHL. NMU expression was significantly decreased in RCC10 and RCC4 cell lines expressing either wild-type or type 2C mutant VHLs, but not an empty vector control. B) Suppression of HIF via siRNA of HIF-α subunits results in down-regulation of NMU: RCC10 and RCC4 cells were transfected with a control siRNA (firefly luciferase) or siRNA oligos targeting HIF-1α or HIF-2α using LipofectAMINE 2000 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). (Oligos: Firelfly Luciferase 5'-CGUACGCGGAAUACUUCGAdTdT-3' (sense), 5'-AAGCUAAAGGUACACAAUUdTdT-3' (antisense); HIF-1α 5'-CUGAUGACCAGCAACUUGAdTdT-3' (sense), 5'-UCAAGUUGCUGGUCAUCAGdTdT-3' (antisense); HIF-2α 5'-CAGCAUCUUUGAUAGCAGUdTdT-3' (sense), 5'-ACUGCUAUCAAAGAUGCUGdTdT-3' (antisense). Cells were plated in duplicate and harvested 48 hours post transfection for either RNA or protein. Western blotting for HIF-1α and HIF-2α confirmed selective and efficient knock-down of the targeted HIF-α subunit. Real-time RT PCR showed that HIF-α knock-down significantly suppressed NMU expression in both RCC4 and RCC10 cells. *p < 0.01, using Student's t test.

Next we asked whether NMU contains a HIF binding site, known as a hypoxia response element (HRE). A 12 kb segment upstream of the transcriptional start site and the first intron (3 kb) were analysed. Although this region contains several candidate HREs, none were found to be responsive to HIF activation as assessed by increased luciferase reporter activity. There are three possible explanations for this. First, the region may contain a functional HRE but the transfection assays did not provide requisite conditions to detect this. This possibility is lessened because we used different approaches to activate HIF (DMOG or co-transfection with a plasmid expressing constitutively active HIF), different cell lines, and all experiments were accompanied by controls using an HRE which confirmed a high amplitude HIF response. Second, there may be an HRE which lies outside this region; a precedent for this is the prototypical HRE which actually lies 3' to the EPO gene [21]. Third, the effect of HIF may be indirect.

NMU is believed to act mainly in a paracrine fashion, and autocrine signalling has been suggested in several cancer settings [13]. To determine whether renal cancer cells might respond to NMU we first examined expression of the receptors NMUR1 and NMUR2. Western analysis showed that NMUR1 was expressed in both the RCC4 and RCC10 cell backgrounds and that there was no substantial effect of VHL status on expression levels (Figure 4A). Expression of NMUR2 was not detected (data not shown). Previous studies have reported that NMU receptor binding triggers the mobilisation of intracellular calcium [13]. Renal cancer cells and sublines expressing VHL (RCC10, RCC4, RCC10/VHL, RCC4/VHL) were loaded with a calcium sensitive fluorescent dye prior to treatment with exogenous NMU peptide. Addition of NMU caused a sharp calcium influx in all cell lines, regardless of VHL status, whereas addition of vehicle alone caused no significant change. A representative FLIPR trace is shown in Figure 4B. Given that these experiments show that an NMU response pathway is present in renal cancer cells, we next investigated the potential functional role of NMU in these cells.
Figure 4
Figure 4

The NMU pathway is functionally active in renal cancer cells and contributes to a migratory and invasive phenotype. A) Western blotting showed that NMUR1 is expressed in CCRCC cells. B) NMU peptide induces a calcium flux in renal cancer cells: RCC cell cultures were loaded with a calcium sensitive dye (fluo-4 AM; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and washed with HBSS. A fluorometric imaging plate reader (FLIPR; Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA) recorded fluorescence (λEX = 488 nm, λEM = 540 nm) before and after robotic addition of 60 μL of NMU peptide (final concentration = 300 μM) or a vehicle control. A representative trace from RCC10/VHL cells is shown. RCC10, RCC4 and RCC4/VHL cells all showed similar results. Significance was determined by analysing peak fluorescence induction in NMU treated and untreated cells from five independent experiments. C & D) Constitutive expression of NMU promotes cell migration and invasion: Retroviral cell pools expressing either NMU or an empty vector were prepared in RCC10/VHL cells. Cells were serum-starved, fluorescently labelled (migration assay only) and plated onto the upper compartment of FluoroBlok transwell migration chambers (C) or matrigel BioCoat transwell invasion chambers (D). Media with 5% FCS was added to the lower compartment. After 9 hours (migration assays) or 24 hours (invasion assays) cells were fixed. Invasion membranes were stained with Giemsa. Cells were counted in five fields. RCC10/VHL cells expressing NMU showed significantly more migration and invasion than empty vector control cells (*p < 0.05, Student's t test, three independent experiments).

Proliferation and tissue invasion and metastasis are two hallmarks of cancer that have been associated with NMU expression in other cell types [14, 22, 23]. First we tested the effect of NMU on proliferation. Exogenous NMU peptide was added to RCC10/VHL cells; no effect on cell growth was observed (data not shown). Next we tested the ability of NMU to promote migration and invasion of renal cancer cells. RCC10/VHL retroviral cell pools expressing either an empty vector or NMU were prepared and NMU expression was verified by real-time RT-PCR. To assess migration, cells were serum starved for 24 hours, fluorescently labelled and then plated onto the upper section of a transwell chamber in serum free media. The number of cells that migrated through the membrane was recorded. Invasion assays were performed by plating serum-starved cells onto matrigel coated transwell chambers in serum free media. After 24 hours, cells were removed from the top layer and invasive cells on the bottom layer were fixed, stained with Giemsa and counted. Data from three independent experiments and representative photomicrographs are shown in Figure 4C and 4D. Thus expression of NMU was found to significantly enhance both cell migration and invasion of RCC10/VHL cells.

Next, we searched the Gene Expression Omnibus database (GEO, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) for publicly available microarray datasets comparing gene expression in normal human kidney tissues to CCRCC tissues. Three relevant datasets were identified. Analysis of data from Gumz et al. showed a > 2 fold upregulation of NMU in 5/10 pairs of matched normal kidney and tumour tissue from patients with sporadic CCRCCs (Additional File 1a) [24]. Analysis of two larger, independent datasets comparing unmatched normal kidney and CCRCC tissues, GSE15641 and GSE14994, also showed > 2 fold upregulation of NMU in 46.9% and 11.9% of CCRCCs, respectively, compared to the mean expression in normal kidney (Additional File 1b and 1c) [25, 26]. These results are consistent with NMU expression being substantially increased in a subset of human CCRCCs.

Loss of functional VHL has previously been shown to enhance migration and invasion [27]. Here we demonstrate an autocrine NMU pathway in renal cancer cells that likely contributes to promoting migration of VHL expressing cells. This adds to evidence for a role of NMU in diverse cancers including bladder carcinoma [22], ovarian carcinoma [28], lung cancer [23] and acute myeloid leukaemia [13]. It also raises the possibility that HIF activation, for example at altitude, could increase physiological NMU signalling in the brain causing loss of appetite.

List of abbreviations

CCRCC: 

clear cell renal cell carcinoma

FLIPR: 

fluorometric imaging plate reader

GEO: 

Gene Expression Omnibus

HIF: 

hypoxia-inducible factor

HRE: 

hypoxia response element

DMOG: 

dimethyl-oxalylglycine

NMU: 

Neuromedin U

PHD: 

prolyl hydroxylase domain

VHL: 

von Hippel-Lindau.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr Evon Poon for assistance with the cell migration experiments and Mr Sam Ranasinghe for assistance with the calcium flux experiments. This work was supported by a Cancer Research UK grant to P.H.M. and M.A.E. and by the EU framework 7 project Metoxia.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Division of Medicine, University College London, London, UK
(2)
South China Institute of Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Guangzhou Institute of Biomedicine and Health, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510663, China
(3)
ACRF Centre for Cancer Epigenetics, Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Herston Road, Brisbane, Australia

References

  1. Rini BI, Campbell SC, Escudier B: Renal cell carcinoma. Lancet. 2009, 373: 1119-1132. 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60229-4View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Kaelin WG: Molecular basis of the VHL hereditary cancer syndrome. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002, 2: 673-682. 10.1038/nrc885View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Latif F, Tory K, Gnarra J, Yao M, Duh FM, Orcutt ML, Stackhouse T, Kuzmin I, Modi W, Geil L, Schmidt L, Zhou F, Li H, Hui Wei M, Chen F, Glenn G, Choyke P, Walther MM, Weng Y, Duan DR, Dean M, Glavačc D, Richards FM, Crossey PA, Ferguson-Smith MA, Le Paslier D, Chumakov I, Cohen D, Chinault AC, Maher ER, Linehan WM: Identification of the von Hippel-Lindau disease tumor suppressor gene. Science. 1993, 260: 1317-1320. 10.1126/science.8493574View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Harten SK, Esteban MA, Maxwell PH: Identification of novel VHL regulated genes by transcriptomic analysis of RCC10 renal carcinoma cells. Adv Enzyme Regul. 2009, 49: 43-52. 10.1016/j.advenzreg.2008.12.005View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Calzada MJ, Esteban MA, Feijoo-Cuaresma M, Castellanos MC, Naranjo-Suarez S, Temes E, Mendez F, Yanez-Mo M, Ohh M, Landazuri MO: von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor protein regulates the assembly of intercellular junctions in renal cancer cells through hypoxia-inducible factor-independent mechanisms. Cancer Res. 2006, 66: 1553-1560. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-3236View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Harten SK, Deepa S, Barod R, Hergovich A, Balda M, Matter K, Esteban MA, Maxwell PH: Regulation of renal epithelial tight junctions by the VHL tumor suppressor gene involves repression of occludin and claudin 1 and is independent of E-cadherin. Mol Biol Cell. 2009, 20: 13-Google Scholar
  7. Esteban MA, Tran MG, Harten SK, Hill P, Castellanos MC, Chandra A, Raval R, O'Brien T S, Maxwell PH: Regulation of E-cadherin expression by VHL and hypoxia-inducible factor. Cancer Res. 2006, 66: 3567-3575. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-2670View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Krishnamachary B, Zagzag D, Nagasawa H, Rainey K, Okuyama H, Baek JH, Semenza GL: Hypoxia-inducible factor-1-dependent repression of E-cadherin in von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor-null renal cell carcinoma mediated by TCF3, ZFHX1A, and ZFHX1B. Cancer Res. 2006, 66: 2725-2731. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-3719View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Esteban MA, Harten SK, Tran MG, Maxwell PH: Formation of primary cilia in the renal epithelium is regulated by the von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor protein. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006, 17: 1801-1806. 10.1681/ASN.2006020181View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Thoma CR, Frew IJ, Hoerner CR, Montani M, Moch H, Krek W: pVHL and GSK3beta are components of a primary cilium-maintenance signalling network. Nat Cell Biol. 2007, 9: 588-595. 10.1038/ncb1579View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Lutz MS, Burk RD: Primary cilium formation requires von hippel-lindau gene function in renal-derived cells. Cancer Res. 2006, 66: 6903-6907. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-0501View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Brighton PJ, Szekeres PG, Willars GB: Neuromedin U and its receptors: structure, function, and physiological roles. Pharmacol Rev. 2004, 56: 231-248. 10.1124/pr.56.2.3View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Shetzline SE, Rallapalli R, Dowd KJ, Zou S, Nakata Y, Swider CR, Kalota A, Choi JK, Gewirtz AM: Neuromedin U: a Myb-regulated autocrine growth factor for human myeloid leukemias. Blood. 2004, 104: 1833-1840. 10.1182/blood-2003-10-3577View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Ketterer K, Kong B, Frank D, Giese NA, Bauer A, Hoheisel J, Korc M, Kleeff J, Michalski CW, Friess H: Neuromedin U is overexpressed in pancreatic cancer and increases invasiveness via the hepatocyte growth factor c-Met pathway. Cancer Lett. 2009, 277: 72-81. 10.1016/j.canlet.2008.11.028View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Hanada R, Teranishi H, Pearson JT, Kurokawa M, Hosoda H, Fukushima N, Fukue Y, Serino R, Fujihara H, Ueta Y, Ikawa M, Okabe M, Murakami N, Shirai M, Yoshimatsu H, Kangawa K, Kojima M: Neuromedin U has a novel anorexigenic effect independent of the leptin signaling pathway. Nat Med. 2004, 10: 1067-1073. 10.1038/nm1106View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Minamino N, Kangawa K, Matsuo H: Neuromedin U-8 and U-25: novel uterus stimulating and hypertensive peptides identified in porcine spinal cord. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1985, 130: 1078-1085. 10.1016/0006-291X(85)91726-7View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Maxwell PH, Wiesener MS, Chang GW, Clifford SC, Vaux EC, Cockman ME, Wykoff CC, Pugh CW, Maher ER, Ratcliffe PJ: The tumour suppressor protein VHL targets hypoxia-inducible factors for oxygen-dependent proteolysis. Nature. 1999, 399: 271-275. 10.1038/20459View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Semenza GL: Defining the role of hypoxia-inducible factor 1 in cancer biology and therapeutics. Oncogene. 29: 625-634.Google Scholar
  19. Kibel A, Iliopoulos O, DeCaprio JA, Kaelin WG: Binding of the von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor protein to Elongin B and C. Science. 1995, 269: 1444-1446. 10.1126/science.7660130View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Hoffman MA, Ohh M, Yang H, Klco JM, Ivan M, Kaelin WG: von Hippel-Lindau protein mutants linked to type 2C VHL disease preserve the ability to downregulate HIF. Hum Mol Genet. 2001, 10: 1019-1027. 10.1093/hmg/10.10.1019View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Semenza GL, Wang GL: A nuclear factor induced by hypoxia via de novo protein synthesis binds to the human erythropoietin gene enhancer at a site required for transcriptional activation. Mol Cell Biol. 1992, 12: 5447-5454.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Wu Y, McRoberts K, Berr SS, Frierson HF, Conaway M, Theodorescu D: Neuromedin U is regulated by the metastasis suppressor RhoGDI2 and is a novel promoter of tumor formation, lung metastasis and cancer cachexia. Oncogene. 2007, 26: 765-773. 10.1038/sj.onc.1209835View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Takahashi K, Furukawa C, Takano A, Ishikawa N, Kato T, Hayama S, Suzuki C, Yasui W, Inai K, Sone S, Ito T, Nishimura H, Tsuchiya E, Nakamura Y, Daigo Y: The neuromedin U-growth hormone secretagogue receptor 1b/neurotensin receptor 1 oncogenic signaling pathway as a therapeutic target for lung cancer. Cancer Res. 2006, 66: 9408-9419. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-1349View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Gumz ML, Zou H, Kreinest PA, Childs AC, Belmonte LS, LeGrand SN, Wu KJ, Luxon BA, Sinha M, Parker AS, Sun LZ, Ahlquist DA, Wood CG, Copland JA: Secreted frizzled-related protein 1 loss contributes to tumor phenotype of clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2007, 13: 4740-4749. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-0143View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Beroukhim R, Brunet JP, Di Napoli A, Mertz KD, Seeley A, Pires MM, Linhart D, Worrell RA, Moch H, Rubin MA, Sellers WR, Meyerson M, Linehan WM, Kaelin WG, Signoretti S: Patterns of gene expression and copy-number alterations in von-hippel lindau disease-associated and sporadic clear cell carcinoma of the kidney. Cancer Res. 2009, 69: 4674-4681. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-0146PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Jones J, Otu H, Spentzos D, Kolia S, Inan M, Beecken WD, Fellbaum C, Gu X, Joseph M, Pantuck AJ, Jonas D, Libermann TA: Gene signatures of progression and metastasis in renal cell cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2005, 11: 5730-5739. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-2225View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Zia MK, Rmali KA, Watkins G, Mansel RE, Jiang WG: The expression of the von Hippel-Lindau gene product and its impact on invasiveness of human breast cancer cells. Int J Mol Med. 2007, 20: 605-611.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Euer NI, Kaul S, Deissler H, Mobus VJ, Zeillinger R, Weidle UH: Identification of L1CAM, Jagged2 and Neuromedin U as ovarian cancer-associated antigens. Oncol Rep. 2005, 13: 375-387.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

Advertisement