- Open Access
RB acute loss induces centrosome amplification and aneuploidy in murine primary fibroblasts
© Iovino et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006
- Received: 13 April 2006
- Accepted: 20 September 2006
- Published: 20 September 2006
Incorrect segregation of whole chromosomes or parts of chromosome leads to aneuploidy commonly observed in cancer. The correct centrosome duplication, assuring assembly of a bipolar mitotic spindle, is essential for chromosome segregation fidelity and preventing aneuploidy. Alteration of p53 and pRb functions by expression of HPV16-E6 and E7 oncoproteins has been associated with centrosome amplification. However, these last findings could be the result of targeting cellular proteins in addition to pRb by HPV16-E7 oncoprotein. To get a more detailed picture on the role of pRb in chromosomal instability and centrosome amplification, we analyzed the effects of the acute loss of retinoblastoma gene function in primary conditional Rb deficient mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs). Moreover, since pRb is a transcriptional repressor, microarray analysis was done on pRb-competent and pRb-deficient MEFs to evaluate changes in expression of genes for centrosome homeostasis and for correct mitosis.
Acute loss of pRb induces centrosome amplification and aneuploidy in the vast majority of cells analyzed. A time course analysis shows a decrease of cells with amplified centrosomes after 40 days from the adenoviral infection. At this time only 12% of cells still show amplified centrosomes. Interestingly, cells with pRb constitutive loss show a similar percentage of cells with amplified centrosomes. DNA-Chip analyses in MEFs wt (mock infected) and pRb depleted (Ad-Cre infected) cells reveal differential expression of genes controlling both centrosome duplication and mitotic progression.
Our findings suggest a direct link between pRb status, centrosome amplification and chromosomal instability, and define specific mitotic genes as targets whose gene expression has to be altered to achieve or maintain aneuploidy.
- Differentially Express Gene
- Spindle Checkpoint
- Mitotic Checkpoint
- Centrosome Amplification
- Centrosome Duplication
Aneuploidy is considered a common feature of tumors and early stage carcinomas. Aneuploidy and its underlying cause (CIN) could be considered a prerequisite in tumor initiation/progression and like alterations in signaling pathways it is believed essential for tumorigenesis [1, 2]. However, the molecular defects underlying aneuploidy and whether it is a cause or a consequence of the tumor phenotype are not completely clear. At least two possible causes of aneuploidy could be suggested: mutation/alteration in genes encoding spindle checkpoint proteins and defects in genes controlling centrosome numbers.
Some studies suggest that aneuploidy in cancer cells could arise from defects in the mitotic spindle checkpoint. This mitotic checkpoint monitors that in metaphase, all chromosomes are properly aligned and attached to the mitotic spindle before progressing to anaphase. Although in human and murine cells mutations of some of these mitotic genes such as: hBUB1, hSecurin, hMAD2 and hBUBR1 induced aneuploidy in dividing diploid cells over several generations, they were rarely mutated in human tumors [3–7]). Recently, it was reported a hereditary mutation of the hBUBR1 gene in patients with mosaic variegated aneuploidy (MVA) a rare genetic disease with increased cancer risk . Also, MAD2 overexpression was associated with stable inactivation of the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor and consequently E2F-1 activation .
Alternatively, aneuploidy could arise from an initial abnormal chromosome complement that in turn triggers chromosome missegregation and genetic instability . Previously, we showed that transient polyploidization caused by DNA re-replication could be a trigger for aneuploidy in human cells . Moreover, after treatments with anti-mitotic drugs both human and murine pRb deficient cells displayed perpetual aneuploidy and amplified centrosomes  suggesting that deregulation of cell cycle progression and alteration in centrosome numbers could be implicated in chromosomal instability.
Loss of centrosome duplication control will often create multipolar spindles that in turn could be responsible for the incorrect segregation of whole chromosomes leading to aneuploidy. Centrosome duplication is coupled to DNA replication and systems of constraints ensure that centrosome duplication occurs during S phase once and only once. In particular, the activation of cyclin E-Cdk2 (cyclin-dependent kinase 2) complex at the G1/S phase transition of the cell cycle allows both DNA replication and centrosome duplication to proceed. . Centrosome amplification was associated with genetic instability in prostate  and breast cancer  as well as in preinvasive cancer lesions . The observation made in human keratinocytes that centrosome amplification occurs following expression of the HPV16 E6 and E7 oncoproteins  suggests a role in this process for the tumor-suppressors p53 and pRb. Also, centrosome amplification induced by a transient G1/S arrest because of the presence of Hydroxyurea, generated aneuploidy both in human and MEFs with pRb dysfunction . However, it is still controversial whether p53 loss/inactivation plays a direct role in centrosome amplification  and chromosome instability . Indeed, recently it has been reported that p53 deficient cells need cyclin E over-expression, a target of E2F transcription factor, to induce chromosome instability and centrosome amplification . This suggests that pRb dysfunction, resulting in activation of the E2F family transcription factors, could be crucial in centrosome amplification and chromosome instability.
To get additional clues on the role of pRb in CIN we analyzed the effects of acute loss of retinoblastoma gene function on centrosomes and aneuploidy in primary conditional Rb deficient Mouse Embryonic Fibroblasts (MEFs). This conditional knockout system permits us to assess the effects of acute loss of the retinoblastoma gene by the Cre-lox-mediated excision of Rb's exon 19. In addition by DNA microarray analysis of these pRb deficient cells we found altered expression of mitotic genes that could account for chromosomal instability associated with centrosome alterations. Our results suggest a direct link between pRb status, centrosome amplification and altered expression of genes necessary for the correct mitosis progression in triggering aneuploidy.
Centrosome amplification after acute loss of pRb in primary murine fibroblasts
These results underline a different effect of acute versus chronic loss of pRb and that the majority of cells with amplified centrosomes are not maintained during growth in culture most likely because of chromosomal instability triggered by amplified centrosomes. We also scored a fraction of pRb depleted cells showing clusters of multiple centrosomes at each spindle pole (Figure 1C) that could be a safeguard mechanism by which bipolarity of the spindle is maintained and the cells are unlikely to acquire extensive chromosomal alterations.
Acute loss of pRb in primary murine fibroblasts is associated with aneuploidy
Presence of significant changes in gene expression in cells acutely depleted of pRb
The results above suggest that pRb acute loss in primary murine fibroblasts can both induce centrosome amplification and chromosomal instability (aneuploidy). In order to better understand whether loss of pRb affects expression levels of specific genes underlying centrosome amplification and aneuploidy, we used microarray analysis to identify differentially expressed genes in cells wherein pRb was acutely depleted in respect to gene expression of control cells.
Changes in transcript levels of genes associated with mitotic progression after pRb acute loss
microtubule depolymerization mitotic spindle assembly
cytoskeleton associated protein 2
nucleolar and spindle associated protein 1
positive regulation of mitosis
protein regulator of cytokinesis 1
mitotic spindle midzone associated-Cdk dependent
cell cycle, mitosis
regulation of cell cycle
anillin, actin binding protein (scraps homolog, Drosophila)
cell division cycle 20 homolog (S. cerevisiae)
SMC2 structural maintenance of chromosomes 2-like 1 (yeast)
mitotic chromosome condensation
SMC4 structural maintenance of chromosomes 4-like 1 (yeast)
chromosome segregation and organitation, cytokinesis
polo-like kinase 4 (Drosophila)
cell cycle and centrosome homeostasis
cell division cycle 2 homolog A (S. pombe)
mitotic G2 checkpoint
transformed mouse 3T3 cell double minute 2
traversing start control point of mitotic cell cycle
antigen identified by monoclonal antibody Ki 67
meiosis, cell proliferation
RAD21 homolog (S. pombe)
cytokinesis, DNA repair, apoptosis, mitosis
cyclin-dependent kinase 2
cytokinesis, cell cycle, mitosis
aurora kinase A
cell cycle and centrosome homeostasis
anaphase-promoting complex subunit 5
cytokinesis, ubiquitin cycle, cell cycle, mitosis
pituitary tumor-transforming (securin)
cell cycle, chromosome segregation, mitosis
polo-like kinase 1 (Drosophila)
cell cycle and centrosome homeostasis
MAD2 (mitotic arrest deficient, homolog)-like 1 (yeast)
mitotic sister chromatid segregation, cytokinesis, mitotic spindle checkpoint
CDC28 protein kinase regulatory subunit 2
cytokinesis, cell cycle
retinoblastoma binding protein 4
regulation of cell cycle, cytokinesis
NIMA (never in mitosis gene a)-related expressed kinase 2
mitotic sister chromatid segregation, cytokinesis, mitosis
regulation of progression through cell cycle, DNA replication
Breast Cancer Associated Protein 1
DNA repair, apoptosis, mitosis
Centrosome amplification and chromosome instability (aneuploidy) occur in virtually all solid tumors analyzed and could be considered early features in tumor initiation and progression . Gain or loss of chromosomes (aneuploidy) could generate in a single step multiple changes required for tumor initiation and progression. At least two possible cause of aneuploidy, not mutually exclusive, could be suggested: defects in genes controlling centrosome homeostasis and mutations in genes encoding mitotic checkpoint proteins.
Stable disruption of cell cycle proteins such as pRb, p53, Brca1, altered expression of Aurora kinases, presence of the viral oncoproteins HPV16-E7 and HPV16-E6 have been associated with centrosome amplification. In addition dysfunction of genes involved in the mitotic checkpoint such as Mad2l1 and BUB family members could lead to chromosomal instability (aneuploidy) facilitating tumorigenesis.
In mammalian cells DNA replication and centrosome duplication must be completed successfully before mitosis and are tightly regulated by a control network in which pRb plays an important role. To this regard we showed that centrosome amplification and perpetual aneuploidy occurred in MEFs cells stably devoid of pRb only following a prolonged G1/S arrest because of exposure to hydroxyurea . Similar results were recently reported in normal human cells lacking of p16ink4A, a regulator of pRb activity, following hydroxyurea treatment . However, disruption of a checkpoint governed by pRb through inactivation of p16ink4A alone did not lead to centrosome alterations or to chromosomal instability .
Here we demonstrate for the first time that also pRb acute loss in conditional deficient Rb MEFs resulted in centrosome amplification and aneuploidy highlighting the importance of pRb in the control of genetic stability. These results are consistent with recent findings showing that p53 deficient cells also need cyclin E over-expression, a target of the E2F transcription factor, to induce CIN and centrosome amplification . Moreover, reduction in hCDC4 protein level by siRNA resulted in a high increase in cyclin E levels and was associated with spindle dysfunction and CIN . Conditions that favor disruption of cell cycle transitions may then contribute to centrosome amplification that in turn results in chromosomal instability through assembly of multipolar spindles. Our DNA microarray analysis showed that several pathways were affected in cells acutely depleted of pRb. Although it is difficult to discuss each of them in detail, it is worthwhile to outline the upregulation of genes involved in centrosome homeostasis and mitosis progression. In particular DNA microarray analysis revealed changes in transcripts of mitotic genes not shown previously, in addition to known genes under E2F control that define a pRb null phenotype [26, 27]. We found that critical regulators of mitotic progression and centrosome duplication that harbor oncogenic activity and exhibit aberrant expression in multiple tumors such as Plk1, STK6 (Aurora-A), Stathmin 1 and BRCA1 were upregulated after pRb acute loss. Recently, it has been shown that activation of the RB-pathway resulted in the repression of Plk1 promoter activity and that this action was dependent on the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex . Also the increase of Stathmin 1 expression levels could play a role in chromosomal instability in murine cells. In fact recent studies point to Stathmin 1 as an important mitotic regulator highly expressed in many cancers that is under transcriptional control of E2F . Expression of the HPV16-E7 prevented the down-regulation of Stathmin 1 and led to premature exit from G2 after genotoxic stress . Thus, functional complexes containing E2F and RB appear to be essential for repressing expression of critical mitotic regulators. The increase in the mitotic index of cells acutely depleted of pRb suggested the activation of the mitotic checkpoint triggered by MAD2 levels whose increased gene expression was confirmed by Real time RT-PCR. However, the concomitant over-expression of important mitotic regulators such as Aurora-A and cdc20 could allow some cells to override the activated mitotic checkpoint and then result in aneuploidy . Recently, it was reported that in cells stably depleted of pRb via RNA interference by short hairpin RNAs against Rb transcript increased expression of MAD2 led to chromosomal instability . The explanation for this paradoxical effect of MAD2 was that part of the population adapted to the activated checkpoint, and entered the cell cycle as polyploid cells. This could then cause chromosome misdistribution in subsequent mitoses. However, it could be also possible that additional genetic changes arose during the selection (i.e. Aurora-A/cdc20 over-expression) and overrode the activated mitotic checkpoint.
Altogether, our findings strongly suggest that pRb acute loss resulting in centrosome amplification and likely affecting expression of G2/M genes other than G1/S genes could be crucial in CIN.
Centrosome amplification is a frequent event in almost all types of solid tumors and although it is not completely clear what cellular factors are responsible for chromosome instability associated with initiation of cancer, it is known that the majority of cancers have mutations in components of Rb pathway. The effects of pRb acute loss in primary murine cells seem to link deregulation of cell cycle progression and alteration in centrosome numbers and mitotic genes to induce aneuploidy.
Finally, we hypothesize that the loss of pRb triggered centrosome amplification by altering expression of genes encoding protein for centrosome homeostasis (i.e. cyclin E, Aurora-A, PLK1, Nek2) and induced defects in components of the spindle checkpoint (MAD2) that in turn gave rise to aneuploidy.
Cells and cell culture
Mouse Embryonic Fibroblasts (MEFs) with conditional Rb alleles (RbLoxP/LoxP MEFs) were infected (MOI: 300, that ensures 90–95% of successful infected fibroblasts) with the empty vector J-pCA13 or with adenoviruses (Ad-Cre) expressing the Cre recombinase under control of the human cytomegalovirus (hCMV) immediate-early promoter to generate MEFs devoid of pRb (Rb-/-). All adenoviruses used in this study were replication-deficient (E1 region deleted). Cells were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS, 100 units/ml penicillin and 0.1 mg/ml streptomycin (Euroclone Ltd UK).
Cells were lysed in SDS/PAGE sample buffer, protein extracts were resuspended in loading buffer (0.125 M Tris-HCl, 4% SDS, 20% Glycerol v/v, 0.2 M dithiothreitol, 0.02% Bromophenol Blue, pH 6.8) and 50 μg of proteins (as determined by the Bradford assay) were loaded per lane on a SDS PAGE gel. After gel electrophoresis proteins were electro transferred onto Immobilon-PVDF membrane (Millipore) blocked in 5% (w/v) no-fat milk in TBST buffer (10 mM Tris pH8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% Tween 20) at room temperature and incubated overnight at 4°C with the primary antibody. After washes with TBST buffer the blot was incubated in horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) diluted 1:2000 for 1 hour RT. To detect amount of pRb and MAD2 proteins blots were probed with mouse monoclonal antibodies anti pRb (554136, Becton Dickinson) and anti MAD2 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) respectively as recommended by manufacturer. Equal loading of proteins was evaluated by probing the blots with a mouse monoclonal antibody β-actin (A53-16 Sigma). Blots were developed with chemiluminescent reagent (SuperSignalWest Pico, Pierce Rockford, IL) and exposed to CL-Xposure film (Pierce Rockford, IL) for 1 to 5 min.
Determination of Ploidy
Asynchronous cells were treated with 0.2 μg/ml colcemid (Demecolcine, Sigma, St. Louis, MO) for 4 hours. Cells were harvested by trypsinization, swollen in 75 mM KCl at 37°C, fixed with 3:1 methanol/acetic acid (v/v), and dropped onto clean, ice-cold glass microscope slides. The slides were air-dried and stained with 3% Giemsa in phosphate-buffered saline for 10 min. Chromosome numbers were evaluated using a Zeiss Axioskop microscope under a 100 × objective. At least 50 metaphases were analyzed at each time point.
To detect centrosomes cells (4 × 104) were grown onto glass coverslips, fixed in methanol at -20°C, permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) and blocked with 0.1% BSA both at room temperature. Then, coverslips were incubated with a mouse monoclonal antibody against γ-tubulin (Sigma, diluted 1:250 in PBS-BSA 0,1%), centrin (a gift of Prof J. Salisbury, Rochester, diluted 1:5000 in PBS-BSA 0,1%) or β-tubulin (Sigma, diluted 1:250 in PBS-BSA 0,1%) overnight at 4°C, washed in PBS and incubated with a FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG secondary antibody (Sigma, diluted 1:100 in PBS-BSA 0,1%) for 1 hour at 37°C. Nuclei were visualized with 4', 6-Diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) and examined on a Zeiss Axioskop microscope equipped for fluorescence; images were captured with a CCD digital camera (Axiocam, Zeiss) and then transferred to Adobe PhotoShop for printing.
RNA preparation for microarray analysis
Total RNA was extracted from MEF cultures by RNAeasy Mini kit according to the manufacture's instruction (Qiagen). RNA was isolated from control cultures (MEF RbLoxP/LoxP infected with empty adenovirus) at two separated times and from test cultures (MEF RbLoxP/LoxP infected with adenoviruses expressing Cre) at three separated times, for a total of 5 RNA samples for six crosses. Total RNA was used for double stranded c-DNA synthesis using the Superscript Choise System (Invitrogen, Life Technologies) with a (dT)24-T7 promoter region (GGCCAGTGAATTGTAATACGACTCACTATAGGGAGGCGG [dT]24). After c-DNA clean-up, cRNA labeled with biotinylated ribonucleotides was synthesized with the BioArray High Yield RNA transcript labeling kit (Enzo, distributed by Affymetrix, Inc.). The cRNA was cleaned-up by Gene chip Sample Cleanup Module (Affymetrix) and fragmented by metal-induced hydrolysis and used for hybridization with mouse MGU74A arrays (Affymetrix). C-RNA samples were hybridized to mouse Affymetrix Chip MGU74A as recommended by Affymetrix. Hybridization and first analysis were conducted at Genopolis Consortium (Milan). DNA chips were scanned with the GeneChip scanner and signals were processed by using the GeneChip expression analysis algorithm (GCOS, Affymetrix).
Four quality checks were performed to verify the quality of sample preparation and hybridization. First of all for each sample the percentage of probe sets with Detection call "Absent" (A) over the total number of probe sets was determined, as well as for the probe sets with Detection call "Present" (P). Next for each sample the mean value of probe set called A and P respectively was determined. This step of the overall analysis was performed on raw data, before sample normalization, thus differences reflected bias that will be eliminated with the next step of the analysis. Finally the ratios between the expression values for 3' and 5' end of GAPDH and β-actin transcripts was determined. This is useful to control the degree of sample degradation. In order to make different chips comparable, it was necessary to normalize signal intensities, using the Qspline method, a robust non-linear method for normalization using array signal distribution analysis and cubic splines. All probe sets called "Absent" (A) over all conditions and replicates were removed (5012). The 95th percentile of all the signals of the entire dataset that were flagged with an absent call is determined and used as a threshold to remove all the remaining probe sets whose expression values are always below this value in each sample (3440). Finally 4036 probe sets remain for the next analysis steps. PLGEM was used for the selection of differentially expressed genes . The PAM-clustering method was used to partition the gene expression profiles into k clusters. The optimal number of clusters is automatically determined, based on quality scores obtained from different trials of clustering. Experimental conditions where replicates are available are averaged and the logarithm of the ratio between each exp. cond. and the condition chosen as the baseline are calculated (log Ratios). The similarity of the expression profiles of genes within a cluster suggests a similarity in their regulation. Even for poorly annotated genes (e.g. ESTs) a functional hint can be drawn from the occurrence of known genes within the same cluster. The most representative Gene Ontology (GO) annotations for DEG from each cluster were identified by determining the probability (p Value) of random occurrence of GO terms (functional enrichment). Only the statistically most significant annotation terms are selected (p Value ≤ 1e-3).
Real time RT-PCR
Some differentially expressed genes were selected for Real time RT-PCR. The selected sequences (provided by Affymetrix) associated with the probe sets located on the array were tested against public databases to confirm the identity of the genes. Once confirmed, primer were designed with Primer Express software (Applied Biosystems) choosing amplicons of approximately 70–100 bp. Total RNA used for synthesis of microarray probes (above) was reverse-transcribed in a final volume of 100 μL using the High Capacity c-DNA Archive kit (Applied Biosystems) for 10 minutes at 25°C and 2 hours at 37°C. For each sample 2 μL of cDNA, corresponding to 100 ng of reverse transcribed RNA, were analyzed by Real time RT-PCR (95°C for 15 sec, 60°C for 60 sec repeated for 40 cycles), in triplicate, using the ABI PRISM 7300 instrument (Applied Biosystems). Real time RT-PCR was done in a final volume of 25 μl comprising 1× Master Mix SYBR Green (Applied Biosystems) and 0,3 μM of forward and reverse primers for: MAD2 (Fwd: 5'-GCCGAGTTTTTCTCATTTGG-3'; Rev 5'-CCGATTCTTCCCACTTTTCA-3') , Plk1 (Fwd:5'-CTTGGGTATCAGCTGTGT GACAA-3'; Rev 5'-TCAAGGAATTGGGATGGGAG-3'); Aurka (Fwd:5'-GTTCCC TTCGGTCCGAAAC-3'; Rev 5'-AATCATTTCCGGAGGCTG-3'; β-actin (Fwd:5'-ACCGTGAAAGATGATGACCCAGA-3'; Rev 5'-GAGGCATACAGGGA CAGCACA-3'); BRCA1 (Fwd:5'-CCTTGGCACAGGTGTCCAC-3'; Rev 5' GCCATTGTCCTCTGTCCAGG-3'). Data were analyzed by averaging triplicates Ct (cycle threshold). Levels of RNA expression were determined by using the SDS software version (Applied Biosystems) according to the 2-ΔΔct method. Levels of RNA expression of selected genes were normalized to the internal control actin.
MEFs with conditional Rb alleles were kindly provided by Dr. Marco Crescenzi (ISS, Rome, Italy) Floxed MEFs were derived from mice generated in A. Berns' Laboratory. This work was supported by grants from Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC) and Università di Palermo (ex 60%).
- Duesberg P, Rasnick D, Li R, Winters L, Rausch C, Hehlmann R: How aneuploidy may cause cancer and genetic instability. Anticancer Res. 1999, 19: 4887-4906.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lengauer C, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B: Genetic instabilities in human cancers. Nature. 1998, 396: 643-649. 10.1038/25292View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cahill DP, Lengauer C, Yu J, Riggins GJ, Willson JK, Markowitz SD, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B: Mutations of mitotic checkpoint genes in human cancers [see comments]. Nature. 1998, 392: 300-303. 10.1038/32688View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dai W, Wang Q, Liu T, Swamy M, Fang Y, Xie S, Mahmood R, Yang YM, Xu M, Rao CV: Slippage of mitotic arrest and enhanced tumor development in mice with BubR1 haploinsufficiency. Cancer Res. 2004, 64: 440-445. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-03-3119View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jallepalli PV, Waizenegger IC, Bunz F, Langer S, Speicher MR, Peters JM, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, Lengauer C: Securin is required for chromosomal stability in human cells. Cell. 2001, 105: 445-457. 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00340-3View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pihan GA, Doxsey SJ: The mitotic machinery as a source of genetic instability in cancer. Semin Cancer Biol. 1999, 9: 289-302. 10.1006/scbi.1999.0131View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Michel LS, Liberal V, Chatterjee A, Kirchwegger R, Pasche B, Gerald W, Dobles M, Sorger PK, Murty VV, Benezra R: MAD2 haplo-insufficiency causes premature anaphase and chromosome instability in mammalian cells. Nature. 2001, 409: 355-359. 10.1038/35053094View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hanks S, Coleman K, Reid S, Plaja A, Firth H, Fitzpatrick D, Kidd A, Mehes K, Nash R, Robin N, Shannon N, Tolmie J, Swansbury J, Irrthum A, Douglas J, Rahman N: Constitutional aneuploidy and cancer predisposition caused by biallelic mutations in BUB1B. Nat Genet. 2004, 36: 1159-1161. 10.1038/ng1449View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hernando E, Nahle Z, Juan G, Diaz-Rodriguez E, Alaminos M, Hemann M, Michel L, Mittal V, Gerald W, Benezra R, Lowe SW, Cordon-Cardo C: Rb inactivation promotes genomic instability by uncoupling cell cycle progression from mitotic control. Nature. 2004, 430: 797-802. 10.1038/nature02820View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Di Leonardo A, Khan SH, Linke SP, Greco V, Seidita G, Wahl GM: DNA rereplication in the presence of mitotic spindle inhibitors in human and mouse fibroblasts lacking either p53 or pRb function. Cancer Res. 1997, 57: 1013-1019.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lentini L, Iovino F, Amato A, Di Leonardo A: Centrosome amplification induced by hydroxyurea leads to aneuploidy in pRB deficient human and mouse fibroblasts. Cancer Lett. 2006, 238 (1): 153-160. 10.1016/j.canlet.2005.07.005View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Meraldi P, Lukas J, Fry AM, Bartek J, Nigg EA: Centrosome duplication in mammalian somatic cells requires E2F and Cdk2- cyclin A. Nat Cell Biol. 1999, 1: 88-93. 10.1038/10054View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pihan GA, Purohit A, Wallace J, Malhotra R, Liotta L, Doxsey SJ: Centrosome defects can account for cellular and genetic changes that characterize prostate cancer progression. Cancer Res. 2001, 61: 2212-2219.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lingle WL, Barrett SL, Negron VC, D'Assoro AB, Boeneman K, Liu W, Whitehead CM, Reynolds C, Salisbury JL: Centrosome amplification drives chromosomal instability in breast tumor development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002, 99: 1978-1983. 10.1073/pnas.032479999PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pihan GA, Wallace J, Zhou Y, Doxsey SJ: Centrosome abnormalities and chromosome instability occur together in pre-invasive carcinomas. Cancer Res. 2003, 63: 1398-1404.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Duensing S, Duensing A, Crum CP, Munger K: Human papillomavirus type 16 E7 oncoprotein-induced abnormal centrosome synthesis is an early event in the evolving malignant phenotype. Cancer Res. 2001, 61: 2356-2360.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- D'Assoro AB, Busby R, Suino K, Delva E, Almodovar-Mercado GJ, Johnson H, Folk C, Farrugia DJ, Vasile V, Stivala F, Salisbury JL: Genotoxic stress leads to centrosome amplification in breast cancer cell lines that have an inactive G1/S cell cycle checkpoint. Oncogene. 2004, 23: 4068-4075. 10.1038/sj.onc.1207568View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bunz F, Fauth C, Speicher MR, Dutriaux A, Sedivy JM, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, Lengauer C: Targeted inactivation of p53 in human cells does not result in aneuploidy. Cancer Res. 2002, 62: 1129-1133.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kawamura K, Izumi H, Ma Z, Ikeda R, Moriyama M, Tanaka T, Nojima T, Levin LS, Fujikawa-Yamamoto K, Suzuki K, Fukasawa K: Induction of centrosome amplification and chromosome instability in human bladder cancer cells by p53 mutation and cyclin E overexpression. Cancer Res. 2004, 64: 4800-4809. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-03-3908View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chiba S, Okuda M, Mussman JG, Fukasawa K: Genomic convergence and suppression of centrosome hyperamplification in primary p53-/- cells in prolonged culture. Exp Cell Res. 2000, 258: 310-321. 10.1006/excr.2000.4916View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Young AP, Longmore GD: Differential regulation of apoptotic genes by Rb in human versus mouse cells. Oncogene. 2004, 23: 2587-2599. 10.1038/sj.onc.1207330View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- D'Assoro AB, Lingle WL, Salisbury JL: Centrosome amplification and the development of cancer. Oncogene. 2002, 21: 6146-6153. 10.1038/sj.onc.1205772View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- McDermott KM, Zhang J, Holst CR, Kozakiewicz BK, Singla V, Tlsty TD: p16(INK4a) prevents centrosome dysfunction and genomic instability in primary cells. PLoS Biol. 2006, 4: e51- 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040051PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Piboonniyom SO, Duensing S, Swilling NW, Hasskarl J, Hinds PW, Munger K: Abrogation of the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor checkpoint during keratinocyte immortalization is not sufficient for induction of centrosome-mediated genomic instability. Cancer Res. 2003, 63: 476-483.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rajagopalan H, Jallepalli PV, Rago C, Velculescu VE, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, Lengauer C: Inactivation of hCDC4 can cause chromosomal instability. Nature. 2004, 428: 77-81. 10.1038/nature02313View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Black EP, Huang E, Dressman H, Rempel R, Laakso N, Asa SL, Ishida S, West M, Nevins JR: Distinct gene expression phenotypes of cells lacking Rb and Rb family members. Cancer Res. 2003, 63: 3716-3723.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ishida S, Huang E, Zuzan H, Spang R, Leone G, West M, Nevins JR: Role for E2F in control of both DNA replication and mitotic functions as revealed from DNA microarray analysis. Mol Cell Biol. 2001, 21: 4684-4699. 10.1128/MCB.21.14.4684-4699.2001PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gunawardena RW, Siddiqui H, Solomon DA, Mayhew CN, Held J, Angus SP, Knudsen ES: Hierarchical requirement of SWI/SNF in retinoblastoma tumor suppressor-mediated repression of Plk1. J Biol Chem. 2004, 279: 29278-29285. 10.1074/jbc.M400395200View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Polzin RG, Benlhabib H, Trepel J, Herrera JE: E2F sites in the Op18 promoter are required for high level of expression in the human prostate carcinoma cell line PC-3-M. Gene. 2004, 341: 209-218. 10.1016/j.gene.2004.06.052View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Polager S, Ginsberg D: E2F mediates sustained G2 arrest and down-regulation of Stathmin and AIM-1 expression in response to genotoxic stress. J Biol Chem. 2003, 278: 1443-1449. 10.1074/jbc.M210327200View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Anand S, Penrhyn-Lowe S, Venkitaraman AR: AURORA-A amplification overrides the mitotic spindle assembly checkpoint, inducing resistance to Taxol. Cancer Cell. 2003, 3: 51-62. 10.1016/S1535-6108(02)00235-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pavelka N, Pelizzola M, Vizzardelli C, Capozzoli M, Splendiani A, Granucci F, Ricciardi-Castagnoli P: A power law global error model for the identification of differentially expressed genes in microarray data. BMC Bioinformatics. 2004, 5: 203- 10.1186/1471-2105-5-203PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bonner AE, Wang Y, You M: Gene expression profiling of mouse teratocarcinomas uncovers epigenetic changes associated with the transformation of mouse embryonic stem cells. Neoplasia. 2004, 6: 490-502. 10.1593/neo.04124PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Marine S, Vogis M, van der Gulden H, Janhers J, Berns A: Induction of medullablastomas in p53-null mutant mice by somatic inactivation of Rb in the external granular lager cells of the cerebellum. Genes Dev. 2000, 14: 994-1004.Google Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.