Open Access

Tumor suppressor gene methylation in follicular lymphoma: a comprehensive review

Molecular Cancer20065:44

https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-4598-5-44

Received: 30 March 2006

Accepted: 06 October 2006

Published: 06 October 2006

Abstract

Transcriptional silencing of tumor suppressor genes, associated with DNA methylation, is a common epigenetic event in hematologic malignancies. Although DNA hypermethylation of CpG islands is well described in acute leukemias and myelodysplastic syndromes, much less is known of the specific methylation changes that commonly occur in follicular B cell lymphomas. Earlier methylation studies of follicular lymphoma involved only cell lines; however there is a growing literature of methylation changes in primary human FL samples. Published studies of primary follicular lymphoma specimens have demonstrated that: androgen receptor, SHP1, and death-associated protein kinase genes are commonly methylated. By contrast, the cyclin dependent kinase inhibitors p15, p16, and p57 are uncommon epigenetic events in follicular lymphoma. Methylation of cyclin dependent kinase inhibitors is more common in high grade lymphomas, and may be an important step in the progression and transformation of follicular lymphoma. Further methylation studies in follicular lymphoma should investigate the prognostic and therapeutic significance of these epigenetic changes and investigate methylation of other genes. Finally, reactivation of methylated tumor suppressor genes through the use of hypomethylating agents is a promising and novel approach to the treatment of indolent and transformed follicular lymphomas.

Background

Follicular lymphoma (FL), an indolent subgroup of non-hodgkin lymphomas, is a monoclonal lymphoid neoplasm arising from a malignant germinal center B lymphocyte. FL has an average annual incidence rate of 2.6 per 100,000 people and a median survival of 7.8 years [1, 2].

Recent molecular studies have established that activation of various oncogenes and silencing of tumor suppressor genes is required for FL development and progression. Here we discuss published literature regarding transcriptional silencing associated with DNA methylation in FL. In particular, we detail the genes known to be frequently methylated in FL, discuss their associated protein's function, and conclude with considerations for incorporating hypomethylating agents to reactivate methylated tumor suppressor genes as a novel therapeutic strategy for indolent and transformed FL.

Cancer genetics and epigenetics

Tumor suppressor genes

Tumor suppressor genes protect cells from undergoing malignant transformation. Tumor suppressor genes function by one of the following mechanisms: protect the genome from mutagenic events, impede dysregulated progression through the cell cycle, induce apoptosis in cells that escape normal cell cycle controls, and inhibit cellular migration and metastasis. Classically, tumor suppressor genes have been described to acquire loss of function mutations or deletions leading to their inability to impede malignant transformation. Alternatively, epigenetic events, such as methylation, represent a distinct mechanism of tumor suppressor gene inactivation. Aberrant gene promoter methylation is associated with gene silencing and is functionally equivalent to a deleted gene. Gene silencing by DNA methylation has been considered to be permanent in non-embryonic cells, only reversible pharmacologically during cell division. Interestingly, new findings in lymphocytes may challenge this paradigm of irreversibility but have yet to be widely replicated nor specifically studied in FL [3].

Promoter methylation down regulates transcription

The promoter region of a gene is located upstream, at the 5' end, from the transcription start site. Promoter regions of genes are more rich in cytosine-guanine dinucleotides than would be expected by chance alone, relative to the rest of the genome [4]. These cytosine guanine rich regions are referred to as CpG islands. Many mammalian genes have CpG islands in their promoter regions and are not methylated if the gene is to be transcribed within the cell. Methylation of cytosine residues in CpG islands, by DNA methyltransferase enzymes, is associated with transcriptional silencing.

Tumor suppressor gene methylation is a well recognized mechanism of oncogenesis in many tumor types. B-cell malignancies seem to be particularly susceptible to this phenomenon [5]. Although much of what is known about gene methylation in lymphoma has been derived from study of tumor cell lines, an increasing number of published studies have recently investigated primary human tumor samples. We review the current published literature of aberrant tumor suppressor gene methylation in primary human FL.

DNA methylation analysis techniques

Several methods to evaluate cytosine methylation are available and a complete review of these techniques is beyond the scope of this article. However, a succinct and thorough review of these methods is available [6]. The most commonly utilized methodologies for distinguishing methylated from unmethylated DNA all rely on DNA treatment with sodium bisulfite, which results in the conversion of all unmethylated cytosines to uracil, while leaving methylated cytosines unaltered. Two commonly utilized methods for quantification of DNA methylation are methylation specific polymerase chain reaction (MSP) and restriction enzyme-related polymerase chain reaction (ERP). Both methods require polymerase chain reactions (PCR) amplification of a specific locus within the CpG island of the gene of interest. MSP is a rapid and very sensitive technique to screen methylation where PCR primers designed to amplify either methylated or unmethylated bisulfite converted DNA are utilized; the intensities of methylated and unmethylated bands are analyzed by gel electrophoresis. The primary advantage of MSP is that it is thus far the most sensitive method and can detect 0.1% methylation. The disadvantages of this approach include: PCR bias (differential ability of methylated or unmethylated PCR primers to amplify gene product) and semi-quantitative nature. ERP utilizes methylation specific endonucleases to differentially cleave DNA fragments prior to undergoing PCR. ERP is not a widely used methodology due to problems with sensitivity.

Commonly methylated genes in FL

Androgen receptor

The androgen receptor gene, located on the X chromosome, encodes a member of the receptor group that binds and mediates the actions of androgens [7]. When bound and activated by an androgen, the androgen receptor enters the nucleus and acts as a ligand-dependent transcription factor to upregulate dependent gene transcription [7]. This pathway appears important in regulating lymphopoiesis. Thymus size normally decreases during puberty as a result of increased levels of sex hormones. By contrast, in castrated males thymic hypertrophy has been reported [8]. Whether from decreased androgen production or loss of receptor function, loss of the androgen signal leads to increased release of immature B cells from the bone marrow into the peripheral blood [9].

DNA promoter hypermethylation of the androgen receptor gene is a common finding in FL and other lymphomas. McDonald and colleagues reported 16/19 samples of T and B lymphomas positive for methylated androgen receptor genes [10]. A similar analysis of grade I and II FL found 25/26 samples tested were positive for methylation at the androgen receptor promoter region [11]. This consistent finding suggests that androgen receptor promoter methylation may be a common epigenetic phenomenon in FL pathogenesis.

SHP1

SHP1, also known as PTP1C, PTPN6, HCP, and SHPTP1, is a phosphotyrosine phosphatase that plays many important roles in regulating immune system cell differentiation and activation [12, 13]. SHP1 acts as a growth inhibitor in B-cells by down regulating the intracellular effects of immunoglobulin binding thus requiring more receptor binding to initiate B-cell activation and proliferation [12, 13]. Conversely, B lymphocytes with decreased SHP1 activity are more likely to proliferate and escape apoptosis [12, 13]. Methylation of SHP1 promoter region appears common across a variety of lymphomas. Most FL samples, 32 of 33 assayed, were methylated at the SHP1 promoter region [14, 15]. Additionally, SHP1 was methylated in 100% of plasmacytomas, 93 % of diffuse large B cell lymphomas, 82% of MALT lymphomas, and 82% of mantle cell lymphomas [14, 15]. Conversely, no promoter methylation of SHP1 was noted in 20 normal reactive lymph node samples [14]. Both the nearly uniform methylation of SHP1 in FL samples and the high rates across several lymphoma types suggest that down regulation of SHP1 by promoter hypermethylation may be an important step in lymphomagenesis.

DAP kinase

Death-associated protein kinase (DAPK) is a calcium-calmodulin-dependent serine/threonine kinase that participates in apoptosis [16]. DAPK was first demonstrated to participate in interferon-γ induced apoptosis [17]. Subsequently, DAPK has also been shown to contribute to tumor necrosis factor-α and Fas-induced apoptosis [18]. Blocking DAPK transcription in cells protects them from interferon-γ induced apoptosis but not the cell cycle inhibitory effects of interferon-γ [16]. Loss of DAPK expression due to gene hypermethylation has been demonstrated in bladder and renal cell carcinoma cell lines, immortalized B-cell lines, and primary, non-immortalized, B-cell lymphoma samples [19, 20].

Methylation of DAPK may be a common epigenetic event in FL. In two published studies, twenty-five of twenty-nine (86%) FL samples were positive for aberrant DAPK methylation [5, 21]. DAPK protein was not expressed in those lymphomas with DAPK methylation [5]. Similarly, in nine samples of transformed FL studied before and after transformation, 7/9 were found to have aberrant methylation of DAPK both before and after transformation [5]. Neither of the two unmethylated samples became methylated during the transformation [5]. These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that methylation of DAPK is a common, early epigenetic phenomenon of FL that allows these cells to escape the normal apoptosis of a non-antigen stimulated expanded b-cell population. However, there is also a correlation between increased DAPK methylation and increasing age as a potential confounding variable in such studies.

Methylated cyclin dependent kinases inhibitors associated with FL transformation

p16

p16, located on chromosome 9p21, is the most commonly altered gene in human malignancies [22]. p16 is also known by the following names: INK4, INK4A, CDK4I, MTS1, and CDKN2 [22]. p16 is a 148 amino acid protein containing 4 ankyrin repeats [23]. p16 inhibits the phosphorylation of retinoblastoma protein and thereby impedes mitosis at G1-S transition of the cell cycle pathway [23]. By blocking unregulated cellular proliferation, p16 functions as an important tumor suppressor. The loss of p16 activity, either through gene mutation or promoter hypermethylation, is a common step in tumor development and progression.

Although homozygous deletion of p16 is common in numerous malignancies, it is uncommon in patients with newly diagnosed FL. Only two published studies have tested for p16 deletions in FL. Of twenty-nine FL cases tested, none showed the deletion [24, 25]. However, one of nine patients with transformed FL did have a homozygous p16 deletion [25]. Little data exists examining p16 hypermethylation in FL. A combined analysis of published data showed aberrant p16 promoter methylation in five of sixteen FL cases [26, 27]. Although not specifically reported as FL, another report of patients with "NHL-low grade" found one of eleven patients had tumors with detectible p16 promoter methylation [28].

However, p16 hypermethylation appears to be more frequent in lymphomas with a higher growth fraction. In two studies, fourteen of twenty-four high grade lymphoma samples were demonstrated p16 hypermethylation [27, 28]. These findings suggest that p16 methylation may be an important epigenetic event in the progression and transformation of FL [2527].

p15

p15, also known as INK4B, MTS2 and CDKN2B, is located 25 kilobases from the p16 gene and its protein shares significant areas of homologous amino acid sequences with p16 [29]. p15 inhibits cyclin dependent kinases 4 and 6 contributing to cell cycle arrest at the G1-S transition [30]. In contrast to p16, p15 expression is induced when cells are exposed to transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) and may be essential to regulating the inhibitory cell cycle effects of this cytokine [29]. Similarly, the loss of p15 expression may contribute to TGF-β independent, dysregulated lymphopoeisis. However, presently it is unclear whether p15 is an independent tumor suppressor gene, as most studies of primary tumor samples reporting p1 5 deletion have found simultaneous deletion of p16 also [3133].

Methylation of the p15 promoter region has been reported in acute myeloid and lymphoblastic leukemias, multiple myeloma, and lymphomas [27, 28, 34, 35]. Few studies have specifically detailed the histologic subtype of the lymphomas analyzed. Of those that have, ten of twenty-seven FL samples were found to have detectable p15 methylation [27, 35]. Of the p15 methylated samples, 6/10 were also found to have p16 methylation [27, 35]. The high concordance of p15 and p16 methylation makes it difficult to determine the independent importance of either gene alone.

p57

p57, also known as KIP2 or CDKN1C, is a cyclin-dependant kinase inhibitor. The p57 gene is located on chromosome 11p15.5 [36]. p57 is a tight-binding inhibitor of several G1 cyclin/Cdk complexes and a negative regulator of cell proliferation. Mutations of p57 are implicated in sporadic cancers and Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome suggesting that it is a tumor suppressor gene [3739]. In a recent study, eight of eighteen FL samples (44%) had methylation of the p57 promoter region [40]. A similar proportion of p57 methylation is found in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma samples [40].

p14 is not commonly methylated

p14 protein, also known as p19ARF or CDKN2A, is also a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor known to induce cell cycle arrest at G1 and G2 [41]. p14 is encoded by three exons designated 1-β, 2, and 3 [41]. Exon 2 and 3 is shared with p16 although exon 1 is unique for each of the proteins [41]. Mice with homozygous deletion of p14 frequently develop numerous tumors including lymphomas [42]. Despite these interesting findings, Baur and colleagues found no methylation of the p14 promoter region 5' to exon 1-β in 56 lymphoma samples, which included 14 FL samples [27]. Therefore, hypermethylation of p14 does not appear to be a common epigenetic event in FL.

Methylation of genes with developing interest

GSTP1

GSTP1 is an important enzyme in the detoxification of mutagens [43, 44]. Different polymorphisms of GSTP1 have been associated with the development of lymphoma, suggesting that GSTP1 may be important in the development and/or progression of lymphoma in humans [45]. Less active polymorphisms of GSTP1 confer less resistance to lymphoma development. In one study evaluating promoter methylation of GSTP1, ten of eighteen FL samples were found to have GSTP1 methylation [5]. Similarly, GSTP1 methylation was detected in six of eight hairy cell leukemia samples; by contrast, no methylation was detected in twelve chronic lymphocytic leukemia samples [5]. Further study in FL is warranted as the down regulation of GSTP1 may be an early event in lymphomagenesis.

IL-12R β-2

Interleukin-12 is a pro-inflammatory cytokine produced by dendritic cells and phagocytes that promotes production of interferon-γ and acts synergistically with other cytokines to augment the proliferation and activity of T and NK cells [46]. The direct effects of IL-12 on B cells are not fully understood, but may act through the NFκB pathway in naïve B cells to produce interferon-γ [47]. The IL-12 receptor is composed of two subunits: β-1 and β-2 [48]. The β-1 subunit can also dimerize in the formation of IL-23 receptor, but the β-2 subunit is unique to the IL-12 receptor [46]. Although the β-2 subunit is normally expressed on the surface of B-lymphocytes, its expression has not been detected in various malignant B cell lines, suggesting its potential importance in malignant progression [49].

In a recent study, IL-12 receptor β-2 was not expressed in 12 FL samples tested [50]. Two of these samples were tested for DNA methylation of the IL-12 receptor β-2 gene, and both found to be methylated [50]. Results for mantle cell lymphoma, marginal zone lymphoma, and B cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) were similarly methylated [50]. Incubation with 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine, a demethylating agent, resulted in the re-expression of IL-12 receptor β-2 in FL and CLL cells [50]. Although the mechanism is not entirely clear, these data suggest IL-12 may serve as a tumor suppressor across a wide variety of B cell malignancies and methylation of IL-12 receptor β-2 gene may be a common step in the development of B cell malignancies.

Snk plk2

Polo-like kinase 2 (Snk/Plk2) is a serine-threonine kinase that contributes to cells transitioning from G1 to S phase [51]. The gene is located at 5q12.1-q13.2 [52]. Although cells lacking this enzyme are more sensitive to paclitaxel induced cell death, it is unclear how this enzyme acts as a tumor suppressor [52]. Snk/Plk2 promoter region was found to be methylated in two of four FL samples in one study [53]. The significance of these findings and the impact of epigenetic regulation of Snk/Plk2 on lymphomagenesis still need to be further explored.

GADD45-γ

GADD45 proteins α, β, and γ, are induced by DNA damage and extrinsic stressors [54]. GADD45-γ exerts at least part of its influence by inhibiting the Cdk1/cyclinB1 complex and blocking the S and G2-M cell cycle transition [55]. Tumor cell lines previously lacking GADD45-γ expression that were transfected with GADD45-γ showed significant reduction in colony formation and some cases with frank apoptosis and no culture growth [56]. Gene methylation of GADD45-γ has only rarely been reported in primary FL samples. In one recent study, although 11/13 non-hodgkin lymphoma cell lines were GADD45-γ methylated, only 1/6 primary FL samples were found to be methylated [56]. The apparent discordance between cell lines and primary patient samples will require further evaluation to better estimate the prevalence of GADD45-γ methylation in FL.

Annexin 1

Annexin 1 is a calcium and phospholipid binding protein that may participate in both spontaneous and stimulated apoptosis in some cell lines [57]. Although annexin 1 is expressed in normal adenoid B-cells, it is not detected in FL cell lines or burkitt lymphoma cell lines [58]. The annexin 1 gene was analyzed in burkitt lymphoma cell lines and found to be structurally intact but methylated [58]. Annexin 1 was re-expressed when these burkitt lymphoma cells were cultured with 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine suggesting that aberrant annexin 1 methylation explains decreased annexin 1 expression in FL cells. [58]. Additional studies on patient FL samples are needed to better clarify whether annexin 1 methylation is a common epigenetic event in FL.

Treatment strategies

With combination chemotherapy and rituximab, FL patients may have long remissions. Unfortunately, relapses are part of the natural history of FL. With the exception of treatment with allogeneic bone marrow transplant or stage I disease that is irradiated or resected, FL is generally considered incurable. Most patients will experience multiple relapses of their lymphoma. Patients generally have a shorter response to chemotherapy with each episode of relapsing disease. Further, patients are at risk for their lymphoma transforming from an indolent FL to a more aggressive and treatment refractory lymphoma as the disease progresses.

Hypomethylating agents

Azacitidine (5-azacytidine) [59] and decitabine (5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine) [60] are two hypomethylating medications approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes. Other similar compounds have been described but are not employed clinically in the United States [61]. At concentrations above those required to achieve demethylation, these cytidine analogues have direct cytotoxicity by inhibiting DNA synthesis [59, 62]. However, clinically these agents are believed to be incorporated into replicating DNA and inhibit DNA methyltransferases (DNMT) [59, 62]. During normal cellular replication, the methylation status of each gene is well conserved from the parent to daughter cells. When DNA methyltransferases are inhibited, the newly replicated DNA cannot be methylated by DNMT, allowing transcription and translation of the associated gene. Although beyond the scope of this article, a full discussion of the mechanism of action of this class of medications is available [63]. There is a theoretical concern that treatment with hypomethylating agents may induce the expression of silenced oncogenes or allow translocation of transposable elements within the genome [64]. However, in clinical trials of azacitidine in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome, progression to leukemia was reduced with treatment suggesting that if present, the mutagenic risk of hypomethylation is smaller than the therapeutic benefit in that clonal malignancy [65].

Strategies for therapeutic demethylation

We have reviewed the growing body of clinical data detailing genes known to be hypermethylated in FL. Although no clinical trial has specifically investigated hypomethylating agents in patients with FL, individual patients with various lymphomas have been included in early development trials of these agents [6668]. Some partial responses were reported in these single agent trials, although no documented response lasted longer than seven months and the type of lymphomas are not well described [6668]. In the future, four unique settings exist to investigate hypomethylating agents in FL: i. refractory disease; ii. transformed lymphoma; iii. alternative to traditional cytotoxic chemotherapy; iv. adjuvant to induction cytotoxic chemotherapy.

Patients with refractory cancers are often considered for early development trials as they have already failed standard therapies. Given lymphoma patients short duration of response in phase I trials of DNMT inhibitors, we expect DNMT inhibitors will be most active when incorporated into a multi-drug regimen. Additionally, FL transformation is associated with aberrant methylation of cyclin dependent kinase inhibitors and therapeutic reversal should be explored in this setting. Another appealing strategy is to treat FL patients without cytotoxic therapies. If the hypomethylating agents can induce the expression of androgen receptor, DAPK, and IL-12 receptor β-2, then concurrent treatment with their respective ligands may be investigated clinically. Finally, if a clinical benefit is demonstrated in these settings, DNMT inhibitors could be evaluated as an adjuvant to FL induction chemotherapy regimens.

Conclusion

Androgen receptor, SHP1, and DAPK are commonly methylated genes in FL. We have described a growing list of additional genes that may be frequently methylated in FL and are under investigation. Additionally, methylation of cyclin dependent kinase inhibitors p16, p15, and p57 may be associated with transformation of FL to a more aggressive lymphoma in some patients. More research is needed to identify epigenetic events important to lymphomagenesis and progression as well as identifying prognostic relevance. Clinical trials to develop therapeutic strategies with hypomethylating agents are needed. Preclinical data with hypomethylating agents in FL are promising and offer a new paradigm for clinical exploration in the treatment of patients with FL.
Table 1

Methylated genes in primary follicular lymphoma samples

Gene

# of Methylated Samples (%)

Method of analysis

Gene function

Reference

Androgen receptor

25/26 (96)

MSP

Ligand-dependent transcription factor

[11]

SHP1

32/33 (97)

MSP

Inhibits intracellular effects of surface immunoglobulin binding in B lymphocytes

[14, 15]

Death-associated protein kinase

25/29 (86)

MSP

Involved in interferon-γ, tumor necrosis factor-α, and Fas-ligand induced apoptosis

[5, 21]

p16

5/16 (31)

ERP

Cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor

[26, 27]

p15

10/27 (37)

ERP

Cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor

[27, 35]

p57

8/18 (44)

MSP

Cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor

[40]

GSTP1

10/18 (56)

MSP

Detoxify mutagens

[5]

IL-12 receptor β-2

2/2 (100)

MSP

Forms heterodimer with IL-12Rβ1 to form IL-12 receptor

[50]

Snk/plk2

2/4 (50)

MSP

DNA damage response and cell growth arrest

[53]

GADD45-γ

1/6 (17)

MSP

DNA damage response and cell growth arrest

[56]

Abbreviations. MSP: Methylation specific PCR; ERP: Restriction enzyme-related PCR

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina

References

  1. Groves FD, Linet MS, Travis LB, Devesa SS: Cancer surveillance series: non-Hodgkin's lymphoma incidence by histologic subtype in the United States from 1978 through 1995. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000, 92 (15): 1240-1251. 10.1093/jnci/92.15.1240View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Swenson WT, Wooldridge JE, Lynch CF, Forman-Hoffman VL, Chrischilles E, Link BK: Improved survival of follicular lymphoma patients in the United States. J Clin Oncol. 2005, 23 (22): 5019-5026. 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.503View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Kersh EN, Fitzpatrick DR, Murali-Krishna K, Shires J, Speck SH, Boss JM, Ahmed R: Rapid demethylation of the IFN-gamma gene occurs in memory but not naive CD8 T cells. J Immunol. 2006, 176 (7): 4083-4093.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Santini V, Kantarjian HM, Issa JP: Changes in DNA methylation in neoplasia: pathophysiology and therapeutic implications. Ann Intern Med. 2001, 134 (7): 573-586.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Rossi D, Capello D, Gloghini A, Franceschetti S, Paulli M, Bhatia K, Saglio G, Vitolo U, Pileri SA, Esteller M, Carbone A, Gaidano G: Aberrant promoter methylation of multiple genes throughout the clinico-pathologic spectrum of B-cell neoplasia. Haematologica. 2004, 89 (2): 154-164.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Oakeley EJ: DNA methylation analysis: a review of current methodologies. Pharmacol Ther. 1999, 84 (3): 389-400. 10.1016/S0163-7258(99)00043-1View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Heinlein CA, Chang C: Androgen receptor (AR) coregulators: an overview. Endocr Rev. 2002, 23 (2): 175-200. 10.1210/er.23.2.175View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Eidinger D, Garrett TJ: Studies of the regulatory effects of the sex hormones on antibody formation and stem cell differentiation. J Exp Med. 1972, 136 (5): 1098-1116. 10.1084/jem.136.5.1098PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Ellis TM, Moser MT, Le PT, Flanigan RC, Kwon ED: Alterations in peripheral B cells and B cell progenitors following androgen ablation in mice. Int Immunol. 2001, 13 (4): 553-558. 10.1093/intimm/13.4.553View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. McDonald HL, Gascoyne RD, Horsman D, Brown CJ: Involvement of the X chromosome in non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2000, 28 (3): 246-257. 10.1002/1098-2264(200007)28:3<246::AID-GCC2>3.0.CO;2-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Yang H, Chen CM, Yan P, Huang TH, Shi H, Burger M, Nimmrich I, Maier S, Berlin K, Caldwell CW: The androgen receptor gene is preferentially hypermethylated in follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. Clin Cancer Res. 2003, 9 (11): 4034-4042.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Pani G, Kozlowski M, Cambier JC, Mills GB, Siminovitch KA: Identification of the tyrosine phosphatase PTP1C as a B cell antigen receptor-associated protein involved in the regulation of B cell signaling. J Exp Med. 1995, 181 (6): 2077-2084. 10.1084/jem.181.6.2077View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Cyster JG, Goodnow CC: Protein tyrosine phosphatase 1C negatively regulates antigen receptor signaling in B lymphocytes and determines thresholds for negative selection. Immunity. 1995, 2 (1): 13-24. 10.1016/1074-7613(95)90075-6View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Koyama M, Oka T, Ouchida M, Nakatani Y, Nishiuchi R, Yoshino T, Hayashi K, Akagi T, Seino Y: Activated proliferation of B-cell lymphomas/leukemias with the SHP1 gene silencing by aberrant CpG methylation. Lab Invest. 2003, 83 (12): 1849-1858. 10.1097/01.LAB.0000106503.65258.2BView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Chim CS, Wong KY, Loong F, Srivastava G: SOCS1 and SHP1 hypermethylation in mantle cell lymphoma and follicular lymphoma: implications for epigenetic activation of the Jak/STAT pathway. Leukemia. 2004, 18 (2): 356-358. 10.1038/sj.leu.2403216View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Deiss LP, Feinstein E, Berissi H, Cohen O, Kimchi A: Identification of a novel serine/threonine kinase and a novel 15-kD protein as potential mediators of the gamma interferon-induced cell death. Genes Dev. 1995, 9 (1): 15-30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Deiss LP, Kimchi A: A genetic tool used to identify thioredoxin as a mediator of a growth inhibitory signal. Science. 1991, 252 (5002): 117-120. 10.1126/science.1901424View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Cohen O, Inbal B, Kissil JL, Raveh T, Berissi H, Spivak-Kroizaman T, Feinstein E, Kimchi A: DAP-kinase participates in TNF-alpha- and Fas-induced apoptosis and its function requires the death domain. J Cell Biol. 1999, 146 (1): 141-148. 10.1083/jcb.146.1.141PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Katzenellenbogen RA, Baylin SB, Herman JG: Hypermethylation of the DAP-kinase CpG island is a common alteration in B-cell malignancies. Blood. 1999, 93 (12): 4347-4353.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Kissil JL, Feinstein E, Cohen O, Jones PA, Tsai YC, Knowles MA, Eydmann ME, Kimchi A: DAP-kinase loss of expression in various carcinoma and B-cell lymphoma cell lines: possible implications for role as tumor suppressor gene. Oncogene. 1997, 15 (4): 403-407. 10.1038/sj.onc.1201172View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Nakatsuka S, Takakuwa T, Tomita Y, Hoshida Y, Nishiu M, Yamaguchi M, Nishii K, Yang WI, Aozasa K: Hypermethylation of death-associated protein (DAP) kinase CpG island is frequent not only in B-cell but also in T- and natural killer (NK)/T-cell malignancies. Cancer Sci. 2003, 94 (1): 87-91. 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2003.tb01357.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Hirama T, Koeffler HP: Role of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors in the development of cancer. Blood. 1995, 86 (3): 841-854.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Serrano M, Hannon GJ, Beach D: A new regulatory motif in cell-cycle control causing specific inhibition of cyclin D/CDK4. Nature. 1993, 366 (6456): 704-707. 10.1038/366704a0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Stranks G, Height SE, Mitchell P, Jadayel D, Yuille MA, De Lord C, Clutterbuck RD, Treleaven JG, Powles RL, Nacheva E: Deletions and rearrangement of CDKN2 in lymphoid malignancy. Blood. 1995, 85 (4): 893-901.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Pinyol M, Cobo F, Bea S, Jares P, Nayach I, Fernandez PL, Montserrat E, Cardesa A, Campo E: p16(INK4a) gene inactivation by deletions, mutations, and hypermethylation is associated with transformed and aggressive variants of non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. Blood. 1998, 91 (8): 2977-2984.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Villuendas R, Sanchez-Beato M, Martinez JC, Saez AI, Martinez-Delgado B, Garcia JF, Mateo MS, Sanchez-Verde L, Benitez J, Martinez P, Piris MA: Loss of p16/INK4A protein expression in non-Hodgkin's lymphomas is a frequent finding associated with tumor progression. Am J Pathol. 1998, 153 (3): 887-897.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Baur AS, Shaw P, Burri N, Delacretaz F, Bosman FT, Chaubert P: Frequent methylation silencing of p15(INK4b) (MTS2) and p16(INK4a) (MTS1) in B-cell and T-cell lymphomas. Blood. 1999, 94 (5): 1773-1781.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Herman JG, Civin CI, Issa JP, Collector MI, Sharkis SJ, Baylin SB: Distinct patterns of inactivation of p15INK4B and p16INK4A characterize the major types of hematological malignancies. Cancer Res. 1997, 57 (5): 837-841.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Hannon GJ, Beach D: p15INK4B is a potential effector of TGF-beta-induced cell cycle arrest. Nature. 1994, 371 (6494): 257-261. 10.1038/371257a0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Kamb A, Gruis NA, Weaver-Feldhaus J, Liu Q, Harshman K, Tavtigian SV, Stockert E, Day RS, Johnson BE, Skolnick MH: A cell cycle regulator potentially involved in genesis of many tumor types. Science. 1994, 264 (5157): 436-440. 10.1126/science.8153634View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Jen J, Harper JW, Bigner SH, Bigner DD, Papadopoulos N, Markowitz S, Willson JK, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B: Deletion of p16 and p15 genes in brain tumors. Cancer Res. 1994, 54 (24): 6353-6358.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Washimi O, Nagatake M, Osada H, Ueda R, Koshikawa T, Seki T, Takahashi T, Takahashi T: In vivo occurrence of p16 (MTS1) and p15 (MTS2) alterations preferentially in non-small cell lung cancers. Cancer Res. 1995, 55 (3): 514-517.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Hebert J, Cayuela JM, Berkeley J, Sigaux F: Candidate tumor-suppressor genes MTS1 (p16INK4A) and MTS2 (p15INK4B) display frequent homozygous deletions in primary cells from T- but not from B-cell lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemias. Blood. 1994, 84 (12): 4038-4044.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Ng MH, Chung YF, Lo KW, Wickham NW, Lee JC, Huang DP: Frequent hypermethylation of p16 and p15 genes in multiple myeloma. Blood. 1997, 89 (7): 2500-2506.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Martinez-Delgado B, Robledo M, Arranz E, Osorio A, Garcia MJ, Echezarreta G, Rivas C, Benitez J: Hypermethylation of p15/ink4b/MTS2 gene is differentially implicated among non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. Leukemia. 1998, 12 (6): 937-941. 10.1038/sj.leu.2401009View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Lee MH, Reynisdottir I, Massague J: Cloning of p57KIP2, a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor with unique domain structure and tissue distribution. Genes Dev. 1995, 9 (6): 639-649.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Fearon ER, Feinberg AP, Hamilton SH, Vogelstein B: Loss of genes on the short arm of chromosome 11 in bladder cancer. Nature. 1985, 318 (6044): 377-380. 10.1038/318377a0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Theillet C, Lidereau R, Escot C, Hutzell P, Brunet M, Gest J, Schlom J, Callahan R: Loss of a c-H-ras-1 allele and aggressive human primary breast carcinomas. Cancer Res. 1986, 46 (9): 4776-4781.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Fujimori M, Tokino T, Hino O, Kitagawa T, Imamura T, Okamoto E, Mitsunobu M, Ishikawa T, Nakagama H, Harada H: Allelotype study of primary hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Res. 1991, 51 (1): 89-93.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Li Y, Nagai H, Ohno T, Yuge M, Hatano S, Ito E, Mori N, Saito H, Kinoshita T: Aberrant DNA methylation of p57(KIP2) gene in the promoter region in lymphoid malignancies of B-cell phenotype. Blood. 2002, 100 (7): 2572-2577. 10.1182/blood-2001-11-0026View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Quelle DE, Zindy F, Ashmun RA, Sherr CJ: Alternative reading frames of the INK4a tumor suppressor gene encode two unrelated proteins capable of inducing cell cycle arrest. Cell. 1995, 83 (6): 993-1000. 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90214-7View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Kamijo T, Zindy F, Roussel MF, Quelle DE, Downing JR, Ashmun RA, Grosveld G, Sherr CJ: Tumor suppression at the mouse INK4a locus mediated by the alternative reading frame product p19ARF. Cell. 1997, 91 (5): 649-659. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80452-3View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Hayes JD, Strange RC: Glutathione S-transferase polymorphisms and their biological consequences. Pharmacology. 2000, 61 (3): 154-166. 10.1159/000028396View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Davis WJ, Ronai Z, Tew KD: Cellular thiols and reactive oxygen species in drug-induced apoptosis. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2001, 296 (1): 1-6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Sarmanova J, Benesova K, Gut I, Nedelcheva-Kristensen V, Tynkova L, Soucek P: Genetic polymorphisms of biotransformation enzymes in patients with Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. Hum Mol Genet. 2001, 10 (12): 1265-1273. 10.1093/hmg/10.12.1265View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Trinchieri G: Interleukin-12 and the regulation of innate resistance and adaptive immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2003, 3 (2): 133-146. 10.1038/nri1001View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Airoldi I, Gri G, Marshall JD, Corcione A, Facchetti P, Guglielmino R, Trinchieri G, Pistoia V: Expression and function of IL-12 and IL-18 receptors on human tonsillar B cells. J Immunol. 2000, 165 (12): 6880-6888.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Presky DH, Yang H, Minetti LJ, Chua AO, Nabavi N, Wu CY, Gately MK, Gubler U: A functional interleukin 12 receptor complex is composed of two beta-type cytokine receptor subunits. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996, 93 (24): 14002-14007. 10.1073/pnas.93.24.14002PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Airoldi I, Guglielmino R, Carra G, Corcione A, Gerosa F, Taborelli G, Trinchieri G, Pistoia V: The interleukin-12 and interleukin-12 receptor system in normal and transformed human B lymphocytes. Haematologica. 2002, 87 (4): 434-442.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Airoldi I, Di Carlo E, Banelli B, Moserle L, Cocco C, Pezzolo A, Sorrentino C, Rossi E, Romani M, Amadori A, Pistoia V: The IL-12Rbeta2 gene functions as a tumor suppressor in human B cell malignancies. J Clin Invest. 2004, 113 (11): 1651-1659. 10.1172/JCI200420303PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Ma S, Charron J, Erikson RL: Role of Plk2 (Snk) in mouse development and cell proliferation. Mol Cell Biol. 2003, 23 (19): 6936-6943. 10.1128/MCB.23.19.6936-6943.2003PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Burns TF, Fei P, Scata KA, Dicker DT, El-Deiry WS: Silencing of the novel p53 target gene Snk/Plk2 leads to mitotic catastrophe in paclitaxel (taxol)-exposed cells. Mol Cell Biol. 2003, 23 (16): 5556-5571. 10.1128/MCB.23.16.5556-5571.2003PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Syed N, Smith P, Sullivan A, Spender LC, Dyer M, Karran L, O'Nions J, Allday M, Hoffmann I, Crawford D, Griffin B, Farrell PJ, Crook T: Transcriptional silencing of Polo-like kinase 2 (SNK/PLK2) is a frequent event in B-cell malignancies. Blood. 2006, 107 (1): 250-256. 10.1182/blood-2005-03-1194View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Takekawa M, Saito H: A family of stress-inducible GADD45-like proteins mediate activation of the stress-responsive MTK1/MEKK4 MAPKKK. Cell. 1998, 95 (4): 521-530. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81619-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Vairapandi M, Balliet AG, Hoffman B, Liebermann DA: GADD45b and GADD45g are cdc2/cyclinB1 kinase inhibitors with a role in S and G2/M cell cycle checkpoints induced by genotoxic stress. J Cell Physiol. 2002, 192 (3): 327-338. 10.1002/jcp.10140View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Ying J, Srivastava G, Hsieh WS, Gao Z, Murray P, Liao SK, Ambinder R, Tao Q: The stress-responsive gene GADD45G is a functional tumor suppressor, with its response to environmental stresses frequently disrupted epigenetically in multiple tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2005, 11 (18): 6442-6449. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-0267View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Solito E, de Coupade C, Canaider S, Goulding NJ, Perretti M: Transfection of annexin 1 in monocytic cells produces a high degree of spontaneous and stimulated apoptosis associated with caspase-3 activation. Br J Pharmacol. 2001, 133 (2): 217-228. 10.1038/sj.bjp.0704054PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Vishwanatha JK, Salazar E, Gopalakrishnan VK: Absence of annexin I expression in B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphomas and cell lines. BMC Cancer. 2004, 4: 8- 10.1186/1471-2407-4-8PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Kaminskas E, Farrell AT, Wang YC, Sridhara R, Pazdur R: FDA drug approval summary: azacitidine (5-azacytidine, Vidaza) for injectable suspension. Oncologist. 2005, 10 (3): 176-182. 10.1634/theoncologist.10-3-176View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Administration USFD: FDA Approves New Treatment for Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS). 2006.Google Scholar
  61. Hatse S, De Clercq E, Balzarini J: Role of antimetabolites of purine and pyrimidine nucleotide metabolism in tumor cell differentiation. Biochem Pharmacol. 1999, 58 (4): 539-555. 10.1016/S0006-2952(99)00035-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Yee KW, Jabbour E, Kantarjian HM, Giles FJ: Clinical experience with decitabine in North American patients with myelodysplastic syndrome. Ann Hematol. 2005, 84 Suppl 13: 18-24. 10.1007/s00277-005-0019-7View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. Leone G, Voso MT, Teofili L, Lubbert M: Inhibitors of DNA methylation in the treatment of hematological malignancies and MDS. Clin Immunol. 2003, 109 (1): 89-102. 10.1016/S1521-6616(03)00207-9View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Iida A, Shimada A, Shima A, Takamatsu N, Hori H, Takeuchi K, Koga A: Targeted reduction of the DNA methylation level with 5-azacytidine promotes excision of the medaka fish Tol2 transposable element. Genet Res. 2006, 87 (3): 187-193. 10.1017/S0016672306008184View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Silverman LR, Demakos EP, Peterson BL, Kornblith AB, Holland JC, Odchimar-Reissig R, Stone RM, Nelson D, Powell BL, DeCastro CM, Ellerton J, Larson RA, Schiffer CA, Holland JF: Randomized controlled trial of azacitidine in patients with the myelodysplastic syndrome: a study of the cancer and leukemia group B. J Clin Oncol. 2002, 20 (10): 2429-2440. 10.1200/JCO.2002.04.117View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Weiss AJ, Metter GE, Nealon TF, Keanan JP, Ramirez G, Swaiminathan A, Fletcher WS, Moss SE, Manthei RW: Phase II study of 5-azacytidine in solid tumors. Cancer Treat Rep. 1977, 61 (1): 55-58.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Quagliana JM, O'Bryan RM, Baker L, Gottlieb J, Morrison FS, Eyre HJ, Tucker WG, Costanzi J: Phase II study of 5-azacytidine in solid tumors. Cancer Treat Rep. 1977, 61: 51-54.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Curt GA, Kelley JA, Fine RL, Huguenin PN, Roth JS, Batist G, Jenkins J, Collins JM: A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of dihydro-5-azacytidine (NSC 264880). Cancer Res. 1985, 45 (7): 3359-3363.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Hayslip and Montero; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement