- Open Access
SMC3 knockdown triggers genomic instability and p53-dependent apoptosis in human and zebrafish cells
© Ghiselli; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006
- Received: 23 September 2006
- Accepted: 02 November 2006
- Published: 02 November 2006
The structural maintenance of chromosome 3 (SMC3) protein is a constituent of a number of nuclear multimeric protein complexes that are involved in DNA recombination and repair in addition to chromosomal segregation. Overexpression of SMC3 activates a tumorigenic cascade through which mammalian cells acquire a transformed phenotype. This has led us to examine in depth how SMC3 level affects cell growth and genomic stability. In this paper the effect of SMC3 knockdown has been investigated.
Mammalian cells that are SMC3 deficient fail to expand in a clonal population. In order to shed light on the underlying mechanism, experiments were conducted in zebrafish embryos in which cell competence to undergo apoptosis is acquired at specific stages of development and affects tissue morphogenesis. Zebrafish Smc3 is 95% identical to the human protein, is maternally contributed, and is expressed ubiquitously at all developmental stages. Antisense-mediated loss of Smc3 function leads to increased apoptosis in Smc3 expressing cells of the developing tail and notocord causing morphological malformations. The apoptosis and the ensuing phenotype can be suppressed by injection of a p53-specific MO that blocks the generation of endogenous p53 protein. Results in human cells constitutively lacking p53 or BAX, confirmed that a p53-dependent pathway mediates apoptosis in SMC3-deficient cells. A population of aneuploid cells accumulated in zebrafish embryos following Smc3-knockdown whereas in human cells the transient downregulation of SMC3 level lead to the generation of cells with amplified centrosome number.
Smc3 is required for normal embryonic development. Its deficiency affects the morphogenesis of tissues with high mitotic index by triggering an apoptotic cascade involving p53 and the downstream p53 target gene bax. Cells with low SMC3 level display centrosome abnormalities that can lead to or are the consequence of dysfunctional mitosis and/or aneuploidy. Collectively the data support the view that SMC3 deficiency affects chromosomal stability leading to the activation of p53-dependent mitotic checkpoint.
- HCT116 Cell
- Zebrafish Embryo
- Mitotic Checkpoint
- Aneuploid Cell
- Centrosome Amplification
The structural maintenance of chromosome 3 protein (SMC3) has been first identified as a key component of the multimeric protein complex cohesin that plays an essential role during the segregation of sister chromatids [1–3]. In addition to chromosomal segregation, SMC3 is also involved in DNA recombination and repair . A multimeric complex containing BRCA1 in addition to SMC3 plays a key role as effectors of the ATM/NBS1 DNA-damage surveillance pathway [5, 6]. Recently SMC3, like p53 and BRCA1, has been identified as the target of the serine/threonine kinase Chk2 that plays a critical role in the DNA damage checkpoint pathway . Given its involvement in pathways affecting genomic stability, SMC3 level alteration is likely to have a significant impact on the cellular genetic integrity. Consistent with this view, elevated SMC3 level has been detected in a significant (~ 60%) fraction of human colon carcinoma and in the tumoral areas of mice genetically prone to develop polyps [8, 9]. In mammalian cells the ectopic expression of SMC3 triggers their transformation to a growth attachment-independent phenotype . Furthermore SMC3 upregulation affects the expression of members of the ras-rho/GTPase and CREB oncogenic pathways that are key players in cell cycle regulation, microtubule dynamics, and in cell differentiation and survival .
Pioneering work in yeast mutants have shown that Smc3 deficiency leads to the premature separation of sister chromatids  and the disruption of the mitotic process. However key differences exist in the regulation of sister chromatid cohesion between yeast and higher eukaryotic cells. In particular the timing of dissociation of the cohesin complex from chromatin at the onset of anaphase is different [12, 13]. How cells of vertebrates respond to SMC3 downregulation has not been examined in detail. Low expression of SMC3 has been detected in rat kidney epithelial cells transfected with Ha-ras , in lung epithelial cells infected with WSN virus , and in damaged axons , suggesting that downregulation of SMC3 is part of the response to oncogenes and stress. Knockdown of Smc3 in c.elegans affects chromosome segregation during mitosis and is embryonically lethal, but the underlying mechanism has not been investigated . Other studies have shown that interference with the formation or dissolution of the cohesin complex causes abnormal mitosis . Knockdown of either the cystein protease securin or of its substrate separase, two key components of the machinery that free sister chromatids from the grip of cohesin at the onset of anaphase, leads to aneuploidy [19, 20]. Since SMC3 is an essential component of the cohesin complex, its deficiency conceivably affects the complex formation or its function . The study of the biology of SMC3 deficiency is however hampered by the fact that mammalian cells that are SMC3-deficient fail to develop into a clonal population and are selectively eliminated. To examine the mechanism and identify the chain of events, we have turned to zebrafish (danio rerio), a developmental model where apoptosis and cell growth arrest can be easily investigated in the whole organism [22, 23]. Zebrafish utilizes cell cycle arrest and apoptosis (p53-dependent and independent) to control morphogenesis . The ability to initiate cell cycle arrest and apoptosis is however acquired at different time during development [24–26] thus offering the opportunity of discriminating the effect of a gene product on each pathways. We have discovered that in zebrafish SMC3 deficiency triggers apoptosis in highly proliferative areas such as those in the developing central nervous system and the tail. We have furthermore established that the morphological changes occurring in Smc3-deficient embryos are secondary to p53-mediated apoptosis that is triggered by the activation of the mitotic checkpoint.
Cloning and chromosomal mapping of zebrafish smc3
Smc3 is maternally and zygotically derived
Smc3 deficiency causes cell death affecting embryonic development
Effect of SMC3-deficiency on zebrafish development.
Apoptotic Phenotype (%)
1 nl Danieau buffer
(B) SMC3 Morpholino-antisense
smc3-MO (1 ng)
smc3-MO (2 ng)
smc3-MO (4 ng)
smc3-MO (8 ng)
smc3-mmMO (8 ng)
(C) zfSMC3 rescue
smc3-MO (4 ng)/smc3 mRNA (250 pg)
(D) p53 Morpholino-antisense rescue
p53-MO (4 ng)
smc3-MO (4 ng)/p53-MO (4 ng)
Smc3 deficiency activates a p53-dependent pathway
Smc3-deficiency triggers genomic instability
Cell death is the driving force in the morphogenesis of developing tissues as well as a major factor in homeostasis of adult organs and tissues. The zebrafish embryo is a good model for studying the interplay between genetic and environmental influences on apoptosis . Development is rapid, and embryos remain transparent throughout most of embryogenesis, simplifying the staging and analysis of whole-mounts. Before mid-blastula transition, an "embryonic" type cell cycle is operative, which is characterized by a rapid alternation between S and M phases and an apparent lack of checkpoints to monitor completion of these phases . It has been hypothesized  that embryos acquire a general capability for apoptosis as a consequence of passage through the maternal-to-zygotic transition, that is after the maternal determinants (mRNAs and proteins) have been exhausted or degraded and replaced by zygotic determinants. The acquisition of apoptosis capability allows the embryo to eliminate defective cells, which were inadvertently generated during the cleavage phase of development to prevent their contribution to critical lineages later in development. Block of cell growth is an alternative mechanism during embryogenesis that is activated in response to DNA damage. This mechanism operates before embryos become capable of disposing cells through apoptosis . The fact that Smc3-deficient embryos do not display significant growth retardation at any stage of development suggests that cell cycle block is not the preferred mechanism to limit the number of defective cells arising from defective mitosis. This conclusion is also supported by the evidence that in smc3 morphants the number of pH3-reactive cells, i. e. of those cells that have entered mitosis, is not significantly affected. Collectively these data thus support the conclusion that apoptosis is specifically triggered when Smc3 level falls. Findings similar to those in the smc3 morphants have been recently reported in the crash&burn (crb) zebrafish mutant that is genetically lacking functional B-myb . Zebrafish B-myb, like the human homolog, plays a role in the cell cycle regulation, particularly at the G2/M transition and the maintenance of normal ploidy. Metaphase spreads demonstrate that bmyb mutants contain polyploid and hypertetraploid cells. As the smc3 morphants, B-myb-null embryos progress through morphogenesis at normal pace but develop massive apoptosis in the brain and the tail region. These findings suggest that in zebrafish mitotic abnormalities are preferentially dealt with through an apoptotic response. Interestingly haploinsufficiency of bmyb leads to an increased rate of tumors after carcinogenesis whereas overexpression data from human tumors suggest that B-myb acts as an oncogene. This observation and others have lead to propose that genes controlling the mitotic checkpoint may affect tumor formation through either inactivation or overexpression [39, 40].
In addition to mounting an apoptotic response, cells that are SMC3 or B-myb deficient display a further striking similarity in their centrosomal organization. During mitosis, two centrosomes form spindle poles and direct the formation of bipolar mitotic spindles, which is an essential event for accurate chromosome segregation into daughter cells. The presence of more than two centrosomes severely disturbs mitotic process and cytokinesis via formation of more than two spindle poles, resulting in an increased frequency of chromosome segregation errors . Centrosome amplification is an early event in tumor formation [41, 42]. It occurs in almost all type of cancer  and is considered as a major contributing factor for chromosome instability in cancer cells leading to aneuploidy . Given that the centrosome organization is disrupted in a significant fraction of cells with low SMC3 level and that the effect is detectable after transient SMC3 level alteration within the context of few cell duplications, we speculate that SMC3 may directly affect the centrosome duplication process. The mechanisms leading to centrosome amplification are still poorly understood. High dose of gamma irradiation that induce DNA strand breaks, induces centrosome amplification but the mechanism through which DNA damage leads to centrosome amplification remains to be elucidated . Conceivably the mechanism involves proteins that like SMC3 are members of the DNA recombination/repair mechanism and of the mitotic spindle checkpoint. Various proteins that associate with centrosomes such as pericentrin, STK15/BTAK/Aurora-A kinase, ATR, BRCA1, BRCA2, have been shown to influence centrosome duplication in human cancer [36, 45–49]. Of these proteins, BRCA1 has been shown to bind to SMC3 [5, 6]. In addition SMC3 binds to dynactin (this lab's unpublished observation) and KIF3B kinesin , two key components of the centrosome multimeric protein complex. The ability of SMC3 to interact with a number of centrosome proteins hints to a possible mechanism through which SMC3 may influence centrosome duplication. Further work is needed to elucidate the potential role of SMC3 on centrosome dynamics that may be also indirect and complex.
In this paper we have described the cloning of zebrafish smc3 and determined that its expression is required for normal embryonic development. Smc3 deficiency triggers an apoptotic cascade involving p53 and the downstream p53 target gene bax. The morphology of tissues such as the tail that during normal development utilize apoptosis for remodeling, is drastically altered. The effect of SMC3 deficiency in human cells recapitulates the results in zebrafish and confirm the involvement of p53. Human SMC3-deficient cells contain an excess number of centrosomes, whereas a population of aneuploid cells is detected in smc3 morphants suggesting that SMC3 is a gatekeeper of genetic stability. We postulate that the deviation of SMC3 from a certain level leads to catastrophic mitoses. The ensuing aneuploidy in turn activates the p53 apoptotic pathway leading to the observed morphological changes. Because aneuploidy is thought to contribute to malignant transformation and tumor progression, these data suggest a link between smc3 haploinsufficiency or loss-of-function and tumorigenesis.
Human kidney embryonic 293 (HEK293) cells were obtained from ATCC (CRL-1573). p53-null and BAX-null human colon carcinoma HCT116 cells and the parental wild-type cell lines were a kind gift of Dr. Volgelstein. Cells were maintained in DMEM medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum.
Embryos were obtained from natural mating of wild-type (Oregon, AB) fish and staged according to criteria previously outlined .
Oligonucleotide sequences matching that of the putative zebrafish smc3 gene were retrieved by querying zebrafish dedicated genomic databases using tblastx and the human SMC3 protein sequence (GenBank NM_005445) as query. This protocol enabled to identify a number of overlapping EST clones belonging to a single major transcript and whose translated sequence matched that of the human protein. For cloning of the coding sequence, mRNA isolated from adult male zebrafish was reverse transcribed using Sensiscript reverse transcriptase (Qiagen) priming with oligo-dT. First strand smc3 cDNA was then amplified by PCR using pfu DNA polymerase and primers of sequence 5'-GCATAAACCGCCATGTACAT TAAA-3' and 5'-TGTGTTTTTCTCTTAGCCGTGAGT-3'. The amplification reaction was extended 10 min by adding taq DNA polymerase to generate overhanging termini needed for insertion of the DNA product into the pcDNA3.1-TOPO and the pCRII-TOPO vectors. Capped mRNA for injection in zebrafish embryos was generated using a mMessage mMachine and T7 RNA polymerase kit (Ambion).
MOs and mRNAs were injected as 1–3 nl bolus into the yolk of 1–2 cell embryos. Post-injection (6 hpf) embryos were sorted, those unfertilized removed and the rest allowed to grow at 28°C. Morpholino-modified antisense oligonucleotides (MO) were obtained from Gene Tools. Those targeting the 5'-UT region of the smc3 gene had sequence 5'-GTACATGGCGGTTTATGCACAAAAC-3' and 5'-CTCCTCAGAAACCAAATAAATAAAG-3' respectively. The control 4-base mismatch antisense oligonucleotide had sequence 5'-GTACtTGGCcGTTTtTGCA gAAAAC-3'. p53-MO were generated and used as described in the literature . MO were dissolved in water at a concentration of 4 mM and further diluted in Danieau buffer (58 mM NaCl, 0.7 mM KCl, 0.4 mM MgSO4, 0.6 mM Ca(NO3)2, 5 mM Hepes, pH 7.2) before injection. At selected times the embryo's morphology was examined under a stereomicroscope.
In Situ hybridization of zebrafish embryos
Sense and antisense digoxigenin-labeled riboprobes were generated with T3 or alternatively T7 RNA polymerase using smc3-pCRII-TOPO as template. Whole embryo in situ hybridization was performed as previously described .
Semi-quantitative RT-PCR and gene expression profiling
mRNA was extracted from 10 embryos using Tri-Reagent and reverse transcribed using oligo-dT primers at 37°C for 2 h. An aliquot of the reaction was used as template for PCR amplification. Reactions were performed in duplicate and limited to 25 cycles to ensure that the amplification was not rate-limited by the available reagents. Products were analyzed on 2% agarose gel. The sets of primers used is listed in Additional file 2.
Western immunoblot analysis
Embryos were dechorionated and most part of the yolk removed. After washing in PBS, the embryos were collected by centrifugation and resuspended in 100 μl 0.15 M Tris-HCl, pH 7.4 buffer containing 0.1% Tween-20. After homogeneization in an eppendorf tube using a tightly fitted pestel, the embryo debris were removed by centrifugation and the supernatant applied to a 7.5% SDS-PAGE. After separation, the proteins were electroblotted to a nitrocellulose filter and Smc3 detected using goat anti-human SMC3 antibody (Santa Cruz, 1:1000) following the manufacturer directions. The immunocomplexes formed were detected using a Dura kit (Pierce) and the secondary HPR conjugated rabbit anti-goat IgG antibody provided in the kit. For Western immunoblotting of SMC3, 293 human cells were collected in lysis buffer, the proteins separated on 7.5% SDS-PAGE and immunodetected as described for the zebrafish protein. For the normalization of the protein loaded with each sample, SMC3 immunocomplexes-stripped filters were reprobed with anti-human β-actin monoclonal antibody.
Apoptotic cells detection in embryo whole-mounts
Apoptotic cells were identified in live embryos with Acrydine Orange (AO) or in fixed embryos by in situ terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT)-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling (TUNEL) reaction. For the AO staining, dechorionated embryos were incubated in 5 μg/ml AO in fish medium (E3) at 28°C for 30 min and washed three timed with 30% Danieau solution for 5 min. Before examination embryos were anaesthetized with 16 mM tricaine. For the TUNEL assay, embryos were collected and washed in PBS before fixation in 4% para-formaldehyde, 0.05% glutaraldehyde, 5 mM EGTA, 5 mM MgSO4 (PGEM solution) for 1 hr at 25°C. To facilitate reagent penetration, after washing in PBS, embryos were dehydrated in serial dilution of pure methanol at -20°C for 15 min and then incubated 15 min at RT in 0.1% Triton X-100/0.1% sodium citrate in PBS, followed by three rinse in PBS. An In Situ Cell Death Detection Kit AP (Roche) was used for the assay. After rinsing, embryos were incubated with alkaline phosphatase (AP)-conjugated antifluorescein antibody for 15 min at 37°C and after washing in PBS, the apoptotic cells were visualized by incubation with NBT/BCIP (nitro blue tetrazolium chloride/5-Bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-phosphate) reagent. The embryos were then mounted in 50% glycerol in PBS and photographed under a light microscope.
Phosphohistone H3 labeling
Embryos were fixed overnight in 4% para-formaldehyde in PBS and permeabilized by immersion in -20°C acetone for 10 min. After washing in PBS, the embryos were placed for 30 min in Blocking Reagent (Roche) and incubated overnight at 4°C with 1 μg/ml rabbit anti-pH3 antibody (Santa Cruz). Immunostaining was performed using HRP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Pierce) followed by color development in DAB solution. Stained embryos were mounted in methylcellulose and examined under a light microscope.
Human embryonic kidney 293 cells were transfected with 50 ng/ml of SMC3-siRNA. Twenty-four h after transfection the cells were harvested by trypsinization and plated on poly-lysine-coated coverslip. Forty-eight h later, cells were washed with PBS, treated with PGEM containing 0.1% Triton-X100 for 1 hr at 25°C, blocked 1 hr in PBS containing 1% BSA and permeabilized by treatment with methanol at -20°C for 15 min. The fixed cells were then incubated with primary mouse IgG anti-γ-tubulin antibody (1:1000) (Santa Cruz) in blocking buffer at 4° overnight. After reaction with Alexafluor 567-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG (Molecular Probes) and DNA staining with DAPI, the cells were examined under a fluorescence/UV microscope. The acquired γ-tubulin (red) and DNA (blue) signals were superimposed in Photoshop.
Cell cycle analysis
Batches of 30 embryos were washed twice in ice cold PBS and digested in 5 ml of ice-cold trypsin solution (0.5 μg/ml trypsin in a solution of 0.14 M NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 5 mM glucose, 7 mM NaHCO3, 0.7 mM EDTA buffer, pH 7.2) with trituration through a large bore glass pipette for 10 min at room temperature. Cell suspensions were centrifuged at 1000 g for 7 min, resuspendend in 200 μl PBS and fixed in 2 ml cold 70% ethanol at 4°C overnight. The fixed cells were collected by centrifugation, washed in PBS and incubated with propidium iodine (40 μg/ml), and RNAse (10 μg/ml) for 30 min at room temperature. Cell DNA content was analyzed on a Coulter Epic flow cytometer. Human cells were harvested by trypsinization and fixed/stained as described for the zebrafish cells. At the time of acquisition the width (FL2-W) and area (FL2-A) of the PI fluorescence was recorded in linear unit. The ModFitLT software was used to deconvolute DNA histograms according to a four component model which assumes that S phase cells distribute equally between 2 N and 4 N cells and apoptotic cells have DNA content less than 2 N.
The Authors wish to thank Dr. Steven A. Farber and Dr. Shiu-Ying Ho for the help provided with the zebrafish breeding, the injection experiments, the whole-mount in situ mRNA hybridization and the microscope analysis. Mr Amit Agrawal and Mr Chirag Patel have provided technical support with many of the molecular biology techniques utilized. This work was supported by grant RO1-CA82290 to GG.
- Strunnikov AV, Larionov VL, Koshland D: SMC1: an essential yeast gene encoding a putative head-rod-tail protein is required for nuclear division and defines a new ubiquitous protein family. J Cell Biol. 1993, 123: 1635-1648. 10.1083/jcb.123.6.1635View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Haering CH, Nasmyth K: Building and breaking bridges between sister chromatids. Bioessays. 2003, 25: 1178-1191. 10.1002/bies.10361View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hirano T: At the heart of the chromosome: SMC proteins in action. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2006, 7: 311-322. 10.1038/nrm1909View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jessberger R, Chui G, Linn S, Kemper B: Analysis of the mammalian recombination protein complex RC-1. Mutat Res. 1996, 350: 217-227.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yazdi PT, Wang Y, Zhao S, Patel N, Lee EY, Qin J: SMC1 is a downstream effector in the ATM/NBS1 branch of the human S-phase checkpoint. Genes Dev. 2002, 16: 571-582. 10.1101/gad.970702PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kitagawa R, Bakkenist CJ, McKinnon PJ, Kastan MB: Phosphorylation of SMC1 is a critical downstream event in the ATM-NBS1-BRCA1 pathway. Genes Dev. 2004, 18: 1423-1438. 10.1101/gad.1200304PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Seo GJ, Kim SE, Lee YM, Lee JW, Lee JR, Hahn MJ, Kim ST: Determination of substrate specificity and putative substrates of Chk2 kinase. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2003, 304: 339-343. 10.1016/S0006-291X(03)00589-8View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ghiselli G, Iozzo RV: Overexpression of bamacan/SMC3 causes transformation. J Biol Chem. 2000, 275: 20235-20238. 10.1074/jbc.C000213200View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ghiselli G, Coffee N, Munnery CE, Koratkar R, Siracusa LD: The cohesin SMC3 is a target the for beta-catenin/TCF4 transactivation pathway. J Biol Chem. 2003, 278: 20259-20267. 10.1074/jbc.M209511200View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ghiselli G, Liu CG: Global gene expression profiling of cells overexpressing SMC3. Mol Cancer. 2005, 4: 34- 10.1186/1476-4598-4-34PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Michaelis C, Ciosk R, Nasmyth K: Cohesins: chromosomal proteins that prevent premature separation of sister chromatids. Cell. 1997, 91: 35-45. 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)80007-6View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Losada A, Yokochi T, Kobayashi R, Hirano T: Identification and characterization of SA/Scc3p subunits in the Xenopus and human cohesin complexes. J Cell Biol. 2000, 150: 405-416. 10.1083/jcb.150.3.405PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Waizenegger IC, Hauf S, Meinke A, Peters JM: Two distinct pathways remove mammalian cohesin from chromosome arms in prophase and from centromeres in anaphase. Cell. 2000, 103: 399-410. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00132-XView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yoon JW, Kita Y, Frank DJ, Majewski RR, Konicek BA, Nobrega MA, Jacob H, Walterhouse D, Iannaccone P: Gene expression profiling leads to identification of GLI1-binding elements in target genes and a role for multiple downstream pathways in GLI1-induced cell transformation. J Biol Chem. 2002, 277: 5548-5555. 10.1074/jbc.M105708200View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Geiss GK, Salvatore M, Tumpey TM, Carter VS, Wang X, Basler CF, Taubenberger JK, Bumgarner RE, Palese P, Katze MG, Garcia-Sastre A: Cellular transcriptional profiling in influenza A virus-infected lung epithelial cells: the role of the nonstructural NS1 protein in the evasion of the host innate defense and its potential contribution to pandemic influenza. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002, 99: 10736-10741. 10.1073/pnas.112338099PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kury P, Abankwa D, Kruse F, Greiner-Petter R, Muller HW: Gene expression profiling reveals multiple novel intrinsic and extrinsic factors associated with axonal regeneration failure. Eur J Neurosci. 2004, 19: 32-42. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03112.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mito Y, Sugimoto A, Yamamoto M: Distinct developmental function of two Caenorhabditis elegans homologs of the cohesin subunit Scc1/Rad21. Mol Biol Cell. 2003, 14: 2399-2409. 10.1091/mbc.E02-09-0603PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nasmyth K: Segregating sister genomes: the molecular biology of chromosome separation. Science. 2002, 297: 559-565. 10.1126/science.1074757View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jallepalli PV, Waizenegger IC, Bunz F, Langer S, Speicher MR, Peters JM, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, Lengauer C: Securin is required for chromosomal stability in human cells. Cell. 2001, 105: 445-457. 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00340-3View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kumada K, Yao R, Kawaguchi T, Karasawa M, Hoshikawa K, Sugitani Y, Imoto I, Inazawa J, Sugawara M, Yanagida M, Noda T: The selective continued linkage of centromeres from mitosis to interphase in the absence of mammalian separase. J Cell Biol. 2006, 172: 835-846. 10.1083/jcb.200511126PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Patel CA, Ghiselli G: Hinderin, a five-domains protein including coiled-coil motifs that binds to SMC3. BMC Cell Biol. 2005, 6: 3- 10.1186/1471-2121-6-3PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Langheinrich U, Hennen E, Stott G, Vacun G: Zebrafish as a model organism for the identification and characterization of drugs and genes affecting p53 signaling. Curr Biol. 2002, 12: 2023-2028. 10.1016/S0960-9822(02)01319-2View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dooley K, Zon LI: Zebrafish: a model system for the study of human disease. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2000, 10: 252-256. 10.1016/S0959-437X(00)00074-5View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ikegami R, Hunter P, Yager TD: Developmental activation of the capability to undergo checkpoint-induced apoptosis in the early zebrafish embryo. Dev Biol. 1999, 209: 409-433. 10.1006/dbio.1999.9243View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ikegami R, Rivera-Bennetts AK, Brooker DL, Yager TD: Effect of inhibitors of DNA replication on early zebrafish embryos: evidence for coordinate activation of multiple intrinsic cell-cycle checkpoints at the mid-blastula transition. Zygote. 1997, 5: 153-175.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cole LK, Ross LS: Apoptosis in the developing zebrafish embryo. Dev Biol. 2001, 240: 123-142. 10.1006/dbio.2001.0432View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Beasley M, Xu H, Warren W, McKay M: Conserved disruptions in the predicted coiled-coil domains of eukaryotic SMC complexes: implications for structure and function. Genome Res. 2002, 12: 1201-1209. 10.1101/gr107302PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nasevicius A, Ekker SC: Effective targeted gene 'knockdown' in zebrafish. Nat Genet. 2000, 26: 216-220. 10.1038/79951View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Huang Q, Raya A, DeJesus P, Chao SH, Quon KC, Caldwell JS, Chanda SK, Izpisua-Belmonte JC, Schultz PG: Identification of p53 regulators by genome-wide functional analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004, 101: 3456-3461. 10.1073/pnas.0308562100PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liu TX, Howlett NG, Deng M, Langenau DM, Hsu K, Rhodes J, Kanki JP, D'Andrea AD, Look AT: Knockdown of zebrafish Fancd2 causes developmental abnormalities via p53-dependent apoptosis. Dev Cell. 2003, 5: 903-914. 10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00339-3View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Plaster N, Sonntag C, Busse CE, Hammerschmidt M: p53 deficiency rescues apoptosis and differentiation of multiple cell types in zebrafish flathead mutants deficient for zygotic DNA polymerase delta1. Cell Death Differ. 2005.Google Scholar
- Ikegami R, Zhang J, Rivera-Bennetts AK, Yager TD: Activation of the metaphase checkpoint and an apoptosis programme in the early zebrafish embryo, by treatment with the spindle-destabilising agent nocodazole. Zygote. 1997, 5: 329-350.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kane DP, Kimmel CB: The zebrafish midblastula transition. Development. 1993, 119: 447-456.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kimmel CB, Ballard WW, Kimmel SR, Ullmann B, Schilling TF: Stages of embryonic development of the zebrafish. Dev Dyn. 1995, 203: 253-310.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fukasawa K: Centrosome amplification, chromosome instability and cancer development. Cancer Letters. 2005, 230: 6-19. 10.1016/j.canlet.2004.12.028View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Piel M, Nordberg J, Euteneuer U, Bornens M: Centrosome-dependent exit of cytokinesis in animal cells. Science. 2001, 291: 1550-1553. 10.1126/science.1057330View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stern HM, Zon LI: Cancer genetics and drug discovery in the zebrafish. Nat Rev Cancer. 2003, 3: 533-539. 10.1038/nrc1126View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zamir E, Kam Z, Yarden A: Transcription-dependent induction of G1 phase during the zebra fish midblastula transition. Mol Cell Biol. 1997, 17: 529-536.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shepard JL, Amatruda JF, Stern HM, Subramanian A, Finkelstein D, Ziai J, Finley KR, Pfaff KL, Hersey C, Zhou Y, Barut B, Freedman M, Lee C, Spitsbergen J, Neuberg D, Weber G, Golub TR, Glickman JN, Kutok JL, Aster JC, Zon LI: A zebrafish bmyb mutation causes genome instability and increased cancer susceptibility. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005, 102: 13194-13199. 10.1073/pnas.0506583102PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Michel LS, Liberal V, Chatterjee A, Kirchwegger R, Pasche B, Gerald W, Dobles M, Sorger PK, Murty VV, Benezra R: MAD2 haplo-insufficiency causes premature anaphase and chromosome instability in mammalian cells. Nature. 2001, 409: 355-359. 10.1038/35053094View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lingle WL, Lutz WH, Ingle JN, Maihle NJ, Salisbury JL: Centrosome hypertrophy in human breast tumors: implication for genomic stability and cell polarity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998, 95: 2950-2955. 10.1073/pnas.95.6.2950PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brinkley BR: Managing the centrosome number game: from chaos to stability in cancer cell division. Trends Cell Biol. 2001, 11: 18-21. 10.1016/S0962-8924(00)01872-9View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pihan GA, Purohit A, Wallace J, Knecht H, Woda B, Quesenberry P, Doxsey SJ: Centrosome defects and genetic instability in malignant tumors. Cancer Res. 1998, 58: 3974-3985.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sato N, Mizumoto M, Nakamura M, Tanaka M: Radiation-induced centrosome overduplication and multiple mitotic spindles in human tumor cells. Exp Cell Res. 2000, 255: 321-326. 10.1006/excr.1999.4797View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sato N, Mizumoto K, Nakamura M, Maehara N, Minamishima YA, Nishio S, Nagai E, Tanaka M: Correlation between centrosome abnormalities and chromosomal instability in human pancreatic cancer cells. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2001, 126: 13-19. 10.1016/S0165-4608(00)00384-8View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Li D, Zhu J, Firozi PF, Abbruzzese JL, Evans DB, Cleary K, Friess H, Sen S: Overexpression of oncogenic STK15/BTAK/Aurora A kinase in human pancreatic cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2003, 9: 991-997.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fuchs E, Cleveland DW: A structural scaffolding of intermediate filaments in health and disease. Science. 1998, 279: 514-519. 10.1126/science.279.5350.514View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schliwa M, Euteneuer U, Graf R, Ueda M: Centrosomes, microtubules and cell migration. Biochem Soc Symp. 1999, 65: 223-231.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Griffin CS, Simpson PJ, Wilson CR, Thacker J: Mammalian recombination-repair genes XRCC2 and XRCC3 promote correct chromosome segregation. Nat Cell Biol. 2000, 2: 757-761. 10.1038/35036399View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shimizu K, Shirataki H, Honda T, Minami S, Takai Y: Complex formation of SMAP/KAP3, a KIF3A/B ATPase motor-associated protein, with a human chromosome-associated polypeptide. J Biol Chem. 1998, 273: 6591-6594. 10.1074/jbc.273.12.6591View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Westerfield M: The zebrafish book. 1995, Eugene, OR, University of Oregon.Google Scholar
- Ghiselli G, Farber SA: D-glucuronyl C5-epimerase acts in dorso-ventral axis formation in zebrafish. BMC Dev Biol. 2005, 5: 19- 10.1186/1471-213X-5-19PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.