In vivo gene transfer targeting in pancreatic adenocarcinoma with cell surface antigens
- Marie Lafitte1, 2,
- Benoit Rousseau3,
- Isabelle Moranvillier1, 2,
- Miguel Taillepierre1, 2,
- Evelyne Peuchant1, 2,
- Véronique Guyonnet-Dupérat2, 4,
- Aurélie Bedel1, 2,
- Pierre Dubus2,
- Hubert de Verneuil1, 2,
- François Moreau-Gaudry†1, 2, 4, 5Email author and
- Sandrine Dabernat†1, 2
© Lafitte et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 24 February 2012
Accepted: 16 August 2012
Published: 22 October 2012
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is a deadly malignancy resistant to current therapies. It is critical to test new strategies, including tumor-targeted delivery of therapeutic agents. This study tested the possibility to target the transfer of a suicide gene in tumor cells using an oncotropic lentiviral vector.
Three cell surface markers were evaluated to target the transduction of cells by lentiviruses pseudotyped with a modified glycoprotein from Sindbis virus. Only Mucin-4 and the Claudin-18 proteins were found efficient for targeted lentivirus transductions in vitro. In subcutaneous xenografts of human pancreatic cancer cells models, Claudin-18 failed to achieve efficient gene transfer but Mucin-4 was found very potent. Human pancreatic tumor cells were modified to express a fluorescent protein detectable in live animals by bioimaging, to perform a direct non invasive and costless follow up of the tumor growth. Targeted gene transfer of a bicistronic transgene bearing a luciferase gene and the herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase gene into orthotopic grafts was carried out with Mucin-4 oncotropic lentiviruses. By contrast to the broad tropism VSV-G carrying lentivirus, this oncotropic lentivirus was found to transduce specifically tumor cells, sparing normal pancreatic cells in vivo. Transduced cells disappeared after ganciclovir treatment while the orthotopic tumor growth was slowed down.
This work considered for the first time three aspect of pancreatic adenocarcinoma targeted therapy. First, lentiviral transduction of human pancreatic tumor cells was possible when cells were grafted orthotopically. Second, we used a system targeting the tumor cells with cell surface antigens and sparing the normal cells. Finally, the TK/GCV anticancer system showed promising results in vivo. Importantly, the approach presented here appeared to be a safer, much more specific and an as efficient way to perform gene delivery in pancreatic tumors, in comparison with a broad tropism lentivirus. This study will be useful in future designing of targeted therapies for pancreatic cancer.
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a highly malignant disease and is the fourth cause of death from cancer in the western world. Due to the lack of specific symptoms, the diagnosis is delayed and PDAC are commonly detected at advanced stages of the disease. Regardless of the treatment, the 5-year survival is less than 5% . Surgical resection offers the best chances of survival at the time of the diagnosis, but is curative in only 13% of the cases and is possible for only 15% of the patients. Moreover, even resectable PDACs display a high rate of recurrence . Systemic chemotherapy still relies on the pyrimidine analog gemcitabine because it has been the only drug producing symptoms improvement, raising the overall 1-year survival from 2% to around 18% of the patients. Extensive efforts have been made to identify adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapies capable of improving the poor prognosis of PDAC, based on the molecular targets involved in cancer progression. Unfortunately, phase III studies have shown limited or even no improvement in patient survival in combination with gemcitabine . In fact, PDAC presents very complex genetic alterations profiles explaining the failure of single gene/pathway targeted adjuvant therapies. Indeed, the Pancreatic Cancer Genome project has analyzed 23,219 transcripts and identified an average of 63 somatic mutations per PDAC affecting 12 core signaling pathways and the overexpression of 500 different genes in 24 tumors .
Thus, it is now critical to test therapies targeting several pathways or therapies inducing specific tumor cell death . In that aspect, cytoreductive therapy inducing direct cell death rather than corrective therapy aimed at repairing genetic defects involved in malignancy should be preferred for PDAC, because of the general resistance of tumor cells against therapeutic agents. In that regard, gene therapy remains an attractive option to transfer suicide genes [4–6]. Specific efficient expression of suicide genes in tumor cells is currently achieved by designing vectors containing tissue-specific promoters. Moreover, suicide genes are chosen to be able to induce bystander killing of cancer cells in the vicinity of gene-modified (transduced) cancer cells . Disappointing results however, have been obtained in phase I/II trials with adenoviruses or retroviruses, but studies are still focusing on improving this treatment conditions . Over the numerous means to perform in vivo gene delivery, increasing interest has been shown in lentiviral vectors because they can infect non-dividing cells and display high gene delivery efficiency. Previous studies have shown the feasibility of gene therapy in PDAC [7–9] with diverse efficiencies of gene transfer. Lentivectors are commonly packaged into viral envelopes exhibiting glycoproteins with a broad tropism, such as Vesicular Stomatitis Virus-Glycoprotein (VSV-G). It is however important to restrain the infectious capacity of therapeutic vectors to the tumor cells only, limiting side effects on the neighboring normal cells. Cell-specific targeting has been developed using a modified envelope displaying the IgG binding-domain of protein A, which can bind the Fc domain of immunoglobulins. In consequence, virions can be associated with cell surface-directed antibodies to target the specific transduction of cancer cells [10–12]. This system has given good results with in vivo models to transduce prostate cancer bone metastasis , the therapeutic gene thymidine kinase in prostate cancer metastasis  and breast cancer cells .
To date, the possibility of specific gene transfer in PDAC tumor cells has not been evaluated, and this study was aimed to test the modified Sindbis virus glycoprotein to target PDAC cells in vivo. PDAC cell surface antigens have been selected according to published data. Recently, a list of biomarker candidates for PDAC has been obtained from a comprehensive literature survey . Accordingly and as previously reported [17, 18], two markers appeared appropriate for the present study because of their localization at the cell surface and their specific overexpression in PDAC, namely the variant 2 of Claudin-18 (CLDN18) and the Mucin-4 protein (MUC4). The Prostate Stem Cell Antigen (PSCA) was also included because it was used by Pariente et al. to target prostate cancer cells with the same system  and has been proposed for immune therapy .
In this study, specific reporter gene transfer has been examined in vitro with antibodies directed against the cell surface markers described above. More importantly, in vivo targeting of pancreatic cancer cells has been tested in subcutaneous and orthotopic xenografts models and quantitatively compared to a broad tropism virus. Our models included the use of a grafted PDAC cell line modified to stably express the tdTomato reporter gene, which expression was directly monitored in live animals by fluorescence detection. Finally, the possibility of transferring the suicide gene thymidine kinase has been assessed in orthotopic xenografts, which growth was monitored by the detection of tdTomato.
Targeted transduction of pancreatic cell lines in vitro
The pancreatic cancer cell lines were then transduced with the oncotropic vectors (with 100 ng of p24 for 5 × 104 cells). They were also transduced with an oncotropic lentivirus associated to an anti-HLA antibody as a positive control or associated with isotype control antibodies (rabbit IgGs) as a negative control. Cell lines displayed efficient transduction with the positive control since at least 30% of the cells were transduced by the viruses associated with the anti-HLA antibody (30% for the PANC1 to 71% for the BXPC3, Figure 2B). Furthermore, the use of anti-PSCA antibody did not achieve transduction efficiencies above that of the negative control values in all the tested lines. Conversely, values with anti-MUC4 and anti-CLDN18 reached percentages of transduction at least 2 times above that of the negative control, the best results being for the anti-CLDN18 in the MIAPACA2 cells and the anti-MUC4 in the CAPAN2 cells (5 times). We asked whether the differences in transduction efficiencies were dependent on the levels of the target surface antigens. Western-blots analyses showed that the PANC1 cell line expressed the highest level of HLA proteins (Figure 2C), but was the least efficient in transduction (only 30%, Figure 2B) as already observed with VSV-G pseudotyped lentivectors (Figure 2A). On the other hand, the MIAPACA2 cells had a very good potential for transduction with the broad tropism virus (Figure 2A), but showed a weaker efficiency with the MUC4 oncotropic virus as compared with the BXPC3 and CAPAN2 cells. Western-blot analysis showed that the MIAPACA2 did express lower levels of MUC4. Therefore, the efficiency of transduction seems to depend on both the intrinsic ability of the cells to be transduced and the level of expression of the cell surface antigen targeting the oncotropic lentivirus.
Thus, the anti-CLDN18 and anti-MUC4 antibodies displayed sufficient transductions in vitro to be further evaluated in in vivo xenograft models with the CAPAN2 and the MIAPACA2 cells.
Targeted transduction of pancreatic cell lines in vivo
Thus, in subcutaneous tumors, intra-tumoral injection of lentiviruses associated with the tumor cell surface antigen MUC4 seemed efficient enough to test the transfer of a suicide gene.
Targeted transduction of the herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase gene is toxic in pancreatic cell lines in vitro and in vivo, in the presence of ganciclovir
Thus intra-tumoral injections of the MUC4 oncotropic virus appeared to be a very specific way to perform gene delivery in pancreatic tumors by contrast to a broad tropism virus, which transduced normal pancreatic cells and reached tissues distant from the tumor and the injection site.
In this study, we tested for the first time the possibility to specifically deliver a therapeutic gene into pancreatic tumor cells using cell surface markers.
Gene transfer with lentiviruses is a very potent approach of gene therapy since viruses can transduce cells regardless of their stage in the cell cycle . Previous studies have reported the possibility to use lentivectors for gene delivery to pancreatic cancer cells but were performed with broad tropism envelopes [7–9]. This approach might represent a risk of morbidity because of possible integrations of the viruses in normal cells (off target transductions). However, viral gene therapy still holds the promise of oncotargeting gene delivery sparing the normal cells, thanks to the modified Sindbis virus glycoprotein developed by Pariente et al.  and used here. This approach offers the possibility to specifically pseudotype the viral particles. We found that modified Sindbis virus glycoprotein-packaged lentiviruses could efficiently transduce the pancreatic cell lines in vitro. Three pancreatic cell surface antigens were tested for specific lentiviral gene transfer. The use of anti-PSCA yielded very poor gene transfer, regardless of the cell line. This result was disappointing since this protein was found highly expressed in pancreatic adenocarcinoma  and anti-PSCA drove efficient gene transfer in prostate tumors . Interestingly however, CLDN18 and MUC4 achieved the best results in terms of efficiency and specificity in vitro and could be suitable for specific gene transfer in pancreatic tumor cells. To test this hypothesis, human tumor cells were grafted under the skin of immune-deficient mice. Therapeutic agent administration by intra-tumoral injections is possible in pancreatic tumors since it has been performed in clinical trials with endoscopic ultrasound injections . Moreover, intra-tumoral injection of therapeutic oncotropic lentiviruses might be safer than intra-venous delivery to limit any systemic toxicity. Anti-MUC4-pseudotyped viruses carrying the firefly luciferase reporter gene, directly injected in the tumors yielded, luminescence signals in the tumors comparable to signals obtained with viruses packaged into the non-specific envelope containing the VSV glycoprotein, in two different cell lines. In vivo, MUC4 was a more potent antigen than CLDN18 and even than HLA antigens in the CAPAN2 cells. Remarkably, luminescence appeared confined to the tumors since no signal was detected elsewhere in the mice, even when the detection mode was used with very low stringency. This observation was made previously when the gene transfer targeting system used here was tested by others [13–15]. Noteworthy, pancreatic injections of viruses in tumor-free mice led to very interesting observations. First, the broad tropism virus transduced very efficiently the pancreas and leaked in other intra-abdominal sites, and even in the testis. By contrast the MUC4 oncotropic virus showed no detectable transduction at any site when injected in the pancreas, in the absence of tumors, even at the injection site. Taken together, this set of data suggests that the oncotropic lentiviral transductions appeared safer and more specific than VSV-G-driven transductions.
The results with CLDN18 oncotropic viruses were somewhat disappointing in the in vivo transductions, considering that the fact that similar results were obtained for CLDN18 and MUC4 oncotropic viruses in vitro (Figure 2B). We actually noticed strong signals one week after virus injections with anti-CLD18 antibodies, but signals had partially disappeared in CAPAN2 and almost totally disappeared in MIAPACA2 cells at the time of sacrifice, after two weeks (not shown). One possible explanation could be that fixation of anti-CLDN18 might interfere with the biological function of claudin 18 in cancer cells, probably leading to cell death.
Herpes thymidine kinase (TK) in combination with the pro-drug ganciclovir remains one of the most potent systems for anticancer gene therapy approach and has given promising results in a very recent phase I clinical trial with an adenoviral system . We evaluated the transfer of the TK gene by MUC4 oncotropic lentiviruses injected in orthotopically grafted human pancreatic tumor cells. Our experimental strategy was designed to do both the follow up of tumor growth (by fluorescence) and of the virus-infected tumor cells (by bioluminescence) in live animals. Importantly and as observed before, luminescence remained confined to the tumors when viruses were injected directly in the pancreas of the recipient mice. Moreover, GCV treatment resulted in luciferase signal loss and in slowing down of the tumor growth. It would be worth now to use this strategy to examine other PDAC-specific cell surface targets, and we feel that this study presents the proof of concept of oncotargeted molecular therapy of PDAC. There are many ways to improve the system. First, several targets (cell surface markers) could be used in concert as well as several rounds of virus injections could be performed to gain in efficiency. Second, once the markers have been validated, it is now possible to use vectors pseudotyped with engineered Sindbis virus glycoprotein bearing a covalent link with the antibodies. Indeed, fusion proteins could be produced  rendering the transduction very potent even in an immune-competent background. Another attractive option would be the use of the biotine/avidine combination developed more recently .
Our study outlines for the first time three major concepts: (i) lentiviral transduction of human pancreatic tumor cells was possible when cells were grafted directly in the pancreas, (ii) this transduction was achieved with a system targeting the tumor cells with cell surface antigens, sparing the normal cells and (iii) detectable loss of reporter gene-expressing cells obtained by viral transduction was observed with the TK/GCV anticancer system. Moreover, the approach presented here appeared to be a safer, much more specific and an as efficient way to perform gene delivery in pancreatic tumors, in comparison with a broad tropism lentivirus. Importantly, we have developed an orthotopic graft model of human PDAC allowing the quantification of tumor growth and the co-localization of oncospecific targeting with direct, costless and non invasive procedures. Future improvement of this gene therapy approach includes the identification of other potent cell surface markers, the use of combinatory cell surface markers for specific gene transfer and the development of oncotropic envelopes stable in immune competent background.
Animals, pancreatic cell lines and antibodies
The NOD/Shi-SCID IL2Rγnull mice were produced and housed in the University Bordeaux Segalen animal facility, according to the rules and regulations governed and enforced by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. The animal facility institutional agreement number is A33063916. Animals were included in protocols between 6 and 8 weeks old. Mice were monitored weekly for body weights and were also examined for aspect and behavior during the time-course of the experiments. No changes were noticed except otherwise indicated. The PDAC PANC1 and MIAPACA2 cell lines were purchased from the ATCC (American Type Culture Collection, Molsheim, France). CAPAN2 and BXPC3 were kindly provided by Joel Tardive-Lacombe (INSERM U624, Marseille, France). The CAPAN2 and BXPC3 cells were maintained in RPMI (Invitrogen) with 10% Fetal Calf Serum (FCS, Invitrogen) and Penicillin/Streptomycin 1/100 (Invitrogen), the PANC1 and MIAPACA2 were cultured in DMEM with 10% FCS and Penicillin/Streptomycin 1/100.
The tdTomato-MIAPACA2 cell line was produced by transduction of the MIAPACA2 cells with a lentivirus carrying the tdTomato reporter gene (PGK-tdTomato, see below). Transduced cells were sorted by a BD FACS ARIA cell sorter (BD Biosciences, France).
The antibodies used in this study were purchased as follows: anti-HLA, anti-MUC4, rabbit IgGs (SIGMA ALDRICH, Lyon, France), anti-CLDN18 (GenWay, San Diego, CA-USA), anti-PSCA (Abcam, Paris, France), anti-PSCA (SIGMA ALDRICH, Lyon, France).
Vector construction, production and transduction of cells
pPGK-tdTomato lentiviral plasmid was constructed by transferring the tdTomato gene from p-tdTomato (Clontech, Saint Germain en Laye, France) into pRRL-Sin-cPPT.PGK.WPRE lentiviral plasmid (gift from Dr. Trono, Lausanne, Switzerland). LUCIFERASE-IRES-TK lentivirus plasmid was obtained by replacing GFP from pLOXgfp-IresTK (Addgene Plasmid # 12243, Cambridge, MA-USA) with the firefly-Luciferase gene (Clontech). Cloning details can be provided upon request. A LUCIFERASE-IRES-ZsGreen lentivirus plasmid was obtained as follows: the fireflyLuciferase gene was cloned into the pIRES2-ZsGreen1 vector (Clontech, Saint Germain en Laye, France). All lentiviral vectors were produced by calcium phosphate mediated triple transient transfection of 293 T cells with one of the vector transfer constructs, the packaging construct pCMVΔ8.91 (gift from Dr. Verma, La Jolla, CA-USA) and either VSV-G construct psPAX2 (gift from Dr. Trono) or 2.2 plasmid (a gift from Drs. Chen and Morizono, coding for a modified Sindbis virus glycoprotein envelope, Los Angeles, CA-USA). The viruses produced were concentrated by ultracentrifugation (through a 10% sucrose cushion). The capside protein p24 titrations were determined as already described .
Analysis of lentiviral transduction by flow cytometry
FACS analyses were performed on a FACScalibur flow cytometer (BD biosciences, Le Pont de Claix, France) on trypsinized cells 3–5 days after transduction. Transductions were carried out on 5.104 cells in 48-well plates. Virus mixes containing 100 ng of p24 were prepared in 250 μl of serum-free medium with antibodies at 0.5 μg/ml. Percentages of GFP-positive cells were determined using CellQuest software (Becton Dickinson, Le Pont de Claix, France) in comparison with non transduced cells, after counting of cells in the FL-1 channel.
Protein extracts were prepared in RIPA buffer and processed for western blotting. Membranes were incubated with the targeting antibodies or a rabbit anti-luciferase antibody (AbCam, Paris, France). Rabbit anti-GAPDH antibody (Cell Signaling Technologies, Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, France) was used to assess equal loading of the samples. Primary antibodies were detected with specific anti-rabbit- or anti-mouse-IgG-HRP (Cell Signaling Technologies). Proteins were visualized using the ECL detection system (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Orsay, France). Quantification by densitometry was performed with the ImageJ software.
Tumors were fixed in 10% NBF, embedded in paraffin and processed by routine histology procedures. The proportion of mitosis/total cells or apoptosis/total cells was evaluated after Hematoxilin staining by direct counting on pictures taken at X40 magnification.
In vitro cell proliferation assay
To test the effect of Herpes Simplex virus thymidine kinase on the tdTomato-MIAPACA2 cell viability in the presence of ganciclovir (GCV, SIGMA ALDRICH, Lyon, France), cells were first transduced with a lentivirus bearing the LUCIFERASE-IRES-TK transgene (see above). Cells were plated at 3.103 cells per well in 96-well plates. The day after, increasing doses of GCV (0-100 μM) were applied and cells were kept in culture for 10 days. Each point was done in quadruplet. The experiments were carried out 2 times. Cells were washed with PBS and treated with MTS (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl) - 2H-tetrazolium) solution (Promega, Charbonnières, France) for 1.5 h to determine cell viability by reading optical densities (OD) at 490 nm. Results are expressed as cell viability:
Bioluminescent imaging of pancreatic adenocarcinoma xenografts
For subcutaneous xenografts, groups of 3–5 mice were anesthetized with isoflurane. 8.105 to 106 cells in 100 μl medium were injected in the right flanks. When tumors reached about 100–150 mm3, diverse combinations of viruses (described in the result section) were injected in the tumors or directly in tumor-free pancreases in single injections. Briefly, 7 μg p24 of lentivirus were mixed, when necessary, with 5 μg of antibody and incubated 5 min at room temperature in 60 μl serum free-medium. Tumors were monitored for luciferase expression on a weekly basis as follows. 150 mg/kg of D-Luciferin (Interchim, Montluçon, France) was injected intraperitonally. After 10 min, mice were anesthetized by isoflurane and placed into a photon bioimager (BIOSPACE LAB, Paris, France) for about 20 min to acquire luminescence images. Signals were quantified with the M3Vision software (BIOSPACE LAB).
For orthotopic xenografts, groups of 4–6 mice were anesthetized with isoflurane. Pancreases were exposed and 8.105 of tdTomato-MIAPACA2 cells in 40 μl medium were injected directly in the pancreas. Tumor growth was monitored weekly with the bioimager using the fluorescence detection setting (Acquisition mode: FLI integration at 22 ms per frame, Excitation = 520 nm, Background = 480 nm, Emission = 570 nm, Filter cut off = 570 nm Illumination: 100%). When signals were easily detectable (after 21 days), mice were anesthetized with isoflurane and injected with the lentiviruses. Ten μg p24 of lentiviruses were incubated 5 min at room temperature in 60 μl serum free-medium with 5 μg of antibody and injected intra-tumorally as described above. Luciferase expression and fluorescence signal were monitored weekly. Two weeks after virus injections, mice were treated daily with GCV (1 mg/mouse).
Transduction efficiencies in vitro are expressed as mean% of transduced cells ± SD. MTS assay results and in vitro transduction results are expressed as mean ± SD. Luminescence quantifications performed in vivo are expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical tests were performed with Student’s t tests or with a 2-sided Mann Whitney test for intra-pancreatic luciferase detections and tumor growth.
We would like to thank Vincent Pitard from the SFR Transbiomed cell cytometry plateform (Bordeaux, France). We thank Alice Bibeyran from vectorology platform for technical assistance. We are indebted to S.Y. Irvin and K. Morizono for providing the 2.2 plasmid. We are very grateful to J. Iovanna for his strong support and useful discussions. We also thank the staff from the Animalerie A2 of the Université Bordeaux Segalen for their technical support. This work was supported by grants from the Ligue contre le cancer (Comité Dordogne), the Institut National du Cancer (INCa), France and funding from the SFR Transbiomed (formerly IFR66).
- Moss RA, Lee C: Current and emerging therapies for the treatment of pancreatic cancer. Onco Targets Ther. 2010, 3: 111-127.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jones S, Zhang X, Parsons DW, Lin JC, Leary RJ, Angenendt P, Mankoo P, Carter H, Kamiyama H, Jimeno A: Core signaling pathways in human pancreatic cancers revealed by global genomic analyses. Science. 2008, 321 (5897): 1801-1806. 10.1126/science.1164368PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wong HH, Lemoine NR: Novel therapies for pancreatic cancer: setbacks and progress. Future Oncol. 2010, 6 (7): 1061-1064. 10.2217/fon.10.70PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bhattacharyya M, Lemoine NR: Gene therapy developments for pancreatic cancer. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2006, 20 (2): 285-298. 10.1016/j.bpg.2005.10.004View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bhaumik S: Advances in imaging gene-directed enzyme prodrug therapy. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2011, 12 (4): 497-507. 10.2174/138920111795163896View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dimou AT, Syrigos KN, Saif MW: Novel agents in the management of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: phase I studies. Highlights from the "2011 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium". San Francisco, CA, USA. January 20–22, 2011. JOP. 2011, 12 (2): 114-116.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hase R, Miyamoto M, Uehara H, Kadoya M, Ebihara Y, Murakami Y, Takahashi R, Mega S, Li L, Shichinohe T: Pigment epithelium-derived factor gene therapy inhibits human pancreatic cancer in mice. Clin Cancer Res. 2005, 11 (24 Pt 1): 8737-8744.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Saraga G, Mafficini A, Ghaneh P, Sorio C, Costello E: Both HIV- and EIAV-based lentiviral vectors mediate gene delivery to pancreatic cancer cells and human pancreatic primary patient xenografts. Cancer Gene Ther. 2007, 14 (9): 781-790. 10.1038/sj.cgt.7701066View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ravet E, Lulka H, Gross F, Casteilla L, Buscail L, Cordelier P: Using lentiviral vectors for efficient pancreatic cancer gene therapy. Cancer Gene Ther. 2010, 17 (5): 315-324. 10.1038/cgt.2009.79View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ohno K, Sawai K, Iijima Y, Levin B, Meruelo D: Cell-specific targeting of Sindbis virus vectors displaying IgG-binding domains of protein A. Nat Biotechnol. 1997, 15 (8): 763-767. 10.1038/nbt0897-763View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Iijima Y, Ohno K, Ikeda H, Sawai K, Levin B, Meruelo D: Cell-specific targeting of a thymidine kinase/ganciclovir gene therapy system using a recombinant Sindbis virus vector. Int J Cancer. 1999, 80 (1): 110-118. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19990105)80:1<110::AID-IJC21>3.0.CO;2-8View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Morizono K, Bristol G, Xie YM, Kung SK, Chen IS: Antibody-directed targeting of retroviral vectors via cell surface antigens. J Virol. 2001, 75 (17): 8016-8020. 10.1128/JVI.75.17.8016-8020.2001PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pariente N, Morizono K, Virk MS, Petrigliano FA, Reiter RE, Lieberman JR, Chen IS: A novel dual-targeted lentiviral vector leads to specific transduction of prostate cancer bone metastases in vivo after systemic administration. Mol Ther. 2007, 15 (11): 1973-1981. 10.1038/sj.mt.6300271View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhang KX, Moussavi M, Kim C, Chow E, Chen IS, Fazli L, Jia W, Rennie PS: Lentiviruses with trastuzumab bound to their envelopes can target and kill prostate cancer cells. Cancer Gene Ther. 2009, 16 (11): 820-831. 10.1038/cgt.2009.28View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhang KX, Kim C, Chow E, Chen IS, Jia W, Rennie PS: Targeting trastuzumab-resistant breast cancer cells with a lentivirus engineered to bind antibodies that recognize HER-2. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011, 125 (1): 89-97. 10.1007/s10549-010-0828-9View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Harsha HC, Kandasamy K, Ranganathan P, Rani S, Ramabadran S, Gollapudi S, Balakrishnan L, Dwivedi SB, Telikicherla D, Selvan LD: A compendium of potential biomarkers of pancreatic cancer. PLoS Med. 2009, 6 (4): e1000046- 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000046PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sahin U, Koslowski M, Dhaene K, Usener D, Brandenburg G, Seitz G, Huber C, Tureci O: Claudin-18 splice variant 2 is a pan-cancer target suitable for therapeutic antibody development. Clin Cancer Res. 2008, 14 (23): 7624-7634. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-1547View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chaturvedi P, Singh AP, Moniaux N, Senapati S, Chakraborty S, Meza JL, Batra SK: MUC4 mucin potentiates pancreatic tumor cell proliferation, survival, and invasive properties and interferes with its interaction to extracellular matrix proteins. Mol Cancer Res. 2007, 5 (4): 309-320. 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-06-0353View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wente MN, Jain A, Kono E, Berberat PO, Giese T, Reber HA, Friess H, Buchler MW, Reiter RE, Hines OJ: Prostate stem cell antigen is a putative target for immunotherapy in pancreatic cancer. Pancreas. 2005, 31 (2): 119-125. 10.1097/01.mpa.0000173459.81193.4dView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Naldini L, Blomer U, Gallay P, Ory D, Mulligan R, Gage FH, Verma IM, Trono D: In vivo gene delivery and stable transduction of nondividing cells by a lentiviral vector. Science. 1996, 272 (5259): 263-267. 10.1126/science.272.5259.263View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Argani P, Rosty C, Reiter RE, Wilentz RE, Murugesan SR, Leach SD, Ryu B, Skinner HG, Goggins M, Jaffee EM: Discovery of new markers of cancer through serial analysis of gene expression: prostate stem cell antigen is overexpressed in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Cancer Res. 2001, 61 (11): 4320-4324.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hecht JR, Bedford R, Abbruzzese JL, Lahoti S, Reid TR, Soetikno RM, Kirn DH, Freeman SM: A phase I/II trial of intratumoral endoscopic ultrasound injection of ONYX-015 with intravenous gemcitabine in unresectable pancreatic carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2003, 9 (2): 555-561.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yang L, Bailey L, Baltimore D, Wang P: Targeting lentiviral vectors to specific cell types in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006, 103 (31): 11479-11484. 10.1073/pnas.0604993103PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Morizono K, Xie Y, Helguera G, Daniels TR, Lane TF, Penichet ML, Chen IS: A versatile targeting system with lentiviral vectors bearing the biotin-adaptor peptide. J Gene Med. 2009, 11 (8): 655-663. 10.1002/jgm.1345PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Robert-Richard E, Richard E, Malik P, Ged C, de Verneuil H, Moreau-Gaudry F: Murine retroviral but not human cellular promoters induce in vivo erythroid-specific deregulation that can be partially prevented by insulators. Mol Ther. 2007, 15 (1): 173-182. 10.1038/sj.mt.6300030View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.