- Open Access
Prognostic significance and therapeutic implications of centromere protein F expression in human nasopharyngeal carcinoma
- Jing-Yan Cao†1, 2, 4,
- Li Liu†1, 3,
- Shu-Peng Chen1, 2,
- Xing Zhang1, 6,
- Yan-Jun Mi1, 2,
- Zhi-Gang Liu1, 3,
- Man-Zhi Li1, 2,
- Hua Zhang1, 2,
- Chao-Nan Qian1, 5,
- Jian-Yong Shao1,
- Li-Wu Fu1, 2,
- Yun-Fei Xia1, 3Email author and
- Mu-Sheng Zeng1, 2Email author
© Cao et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 21 April 2010
Accepted: 9 September 2010
Published: 9 September 2010
Our recent cDNA microarray data showed that centromere protein F (CENP-F) is significantly upregulated in primary cultured nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) tumor cells compared with normal nasopharyngeal epithelial cells. The goal of this study was to further investigate the levels of CENP-F expression in NPC cell lines and tissues to clarify the clinical significance of CENP-F expression in NPC as well as the potential therapeutic implications of CENP-F expression.
Real-time RT-PCR and western blotting were used to examine CENP-F expression levels in normal primary nasopharyngeal epithelial cells (NPEC), immortalized nasopharyngeal epithelial cells and NPC cell lines. Levels of CENP-F mRNA were determined by real-time RT-PCR in 23 freshly frozen nasopharyngeal biopsy tissues, and CENP-F protein levels were detected by immunohistochemistry in paraffin sections of 202 archival NPC tissues. Statistical analyses were applied to test for prognostic associations. The cytotoxicities of CENP-F potential target chemicals, zoledronic acid (ZOL) and FTI-277 alone, or in combination with cisplatin, in NPC cells were determined by the MTT assay.
The levels of CENP-F mRNA and protein were higher in NPC cell lines than in normal and immortalized NPECs. CENP-F mRNA level was upregulated in nasopharyngeal carcinoma biopsy tissues compared with noncancerous tissues. By immunohistochemical analysis, CENP-F was highly expressed in 98 (48.5%) of 202 NPC tissues. Statistical analysis showed that high expression of CENP-F was positively correlated with T classification (P < 0.001), clinical stage (P < 0.001), skull-base invasion (P < 0.001) and distant metastasis (P = 0.012) inversely correlated with the overall survival time in NPC patients. Multivariate analysis showed that CENP-F expression was an independent prognostic indicator for the survival of the patient. Moreover, we found that ZOL or FTI-277 could significantly enhance the chemotherapeutic sensitivity of NPC cell lines (HONE1 and 6-10B) with high CENP-F expression to cisplatin, although ZOL or FTI-277 alone only exhibited a minor inhibitory effect to NPC cells.
Our data suggest that CENP-F protein is a valuable marker of NPC progression, and CENP-F expression is associated with poor overall survival of patients. In addition, our data indicate a potential benefit of combining ZOL or FTI-277 with cisplatin in NPC suggesting that CENP-F expression may have therapeutic implications.
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a disease with remarkable geographic and racial distributions worldwide. It is one of the most common cancers in Southeastern Asia and is highly prevalent among populations originating from Southern China where the yearly incidence rate of NPC is 25-50 per 100,000 people [1, 2]. In North America and other western countries, the yearly incidence is less than 1 per 100,000 . NPC is a particular type of squamous carcinoma of head and neck associated with EBV infection, environmental factors and genetic aberrance . Most NPCs are undifferentiated or poorly differentiated with the following characteristics: fast growth and a great tendency to invade adjacent regions as well as metastasize to regional lymph nodes and distant organs. Although NPCs are usually radiosensitive, local failure and metastasis still occur [4, 5]. Nasopharyngeal carcinogenesis is a multi-step process with morphological progression involving multiple genetic and epigenetic events . Thus, identification of molecular and biological changes that occur during carcinogenesis and progression could facilitate investigation of the pathology of the disease and generate new prognostic markers to more accurately predict patients' clinical outcome, helping to individualize treatments for NPC patients.
CENP-F (or mitosin) is a member of the human centromeric proteins (CENPs) family, which is involved in centromere formation and kinetochore organization during mitosis [7, 8]. Its expression and subcellular localization patterns are regulated in a cell cycle-dependent manner. No detectable expression of CENP-F has been reported in G0/G1, only low levels of expression have been detected in the nuclear matrix during S phase, and CENP-F proteins gradually accumulate in the nucleus in G2 then localizing to kinetochores in mitosis and reach the maximal expression in G2 and M cells . At the end of mitosis, CENP-F is rapidly proteolyzed by the proteasome . Accumulating evidence suggests that CENP-F is an important protein involved in chromosome alignment and kinetochore-microtubule interaction. Depletion of CENP-F results in chromosome misalignment and improper microtubule-kinetochore attachment . It interacts directly with many proteins including CENP-E, NudE, ATF4, and Rb, thereby modulating cell fate . The kinetochore-targeting domain is located near the C-terminus, a region that is sensitive to farnesyltransferase inhibitors (FTIs), which can prevent CENP-F farnesylation and cause mitotic chromosome alignment defects . A recent report showed that zoledronic acid (ZOL) can inhibit farnesylation of CENP-F and disrupt proper localization and functioning of the protein .
Cell cycle-specific expression of CENP-F makes it a potential marker of proliferation. Indeed, CENP-F is correlated with tumor proliferation in a variety of human tumors, including lung cancer , non-Hodgkin lymphoma , salivary gland tumors , and mantle cell lymphoma . CENP-F is also correlated with early recurrence in intracranial meningiomas  and poor prognosis in breast cancer . The CENP-F gene is located on 1q32-q41, which is frequently amplified in NPCs as shown by comparative genomic hybridization analysis . Using a cDNA microarray, we analyzed the global gene expression profile of primary cultured NPC cells and found that CENP-F is significantly upregulated in NPC cells compared with normal nasopharyngeal epithelial cells .
Our previous studies raised important questions regarding patterns of CENP-F expression in human NPC tissues, potential correlations with clinicopathologic grade and prognosis, and its potential role in chemotherapy. Here, we found that CENP-F was upregulated in NPC cell lines and tissues. Immunohistochemistry analysis revealed that CENP-F expression was positively correlated with clinicopathologic features and inversely correlated with overall survival. Cox regression analysis identified CENP-F as an independent factor for clinical prognosis. More importantly, we revealed that combining cisplatin with ZOL or FTI could have synergistic effects in NPC cell lines with high CENP-F expression. Taken together, our results suggest that CENP-F could be a potential prognostic biomarker for clinical outcome and a promising indicator for selective therapeutic treatment in NPC.
CENP-F expression is upregulated in NPC cell lines
Overexpressions of CENP-F in NPC tissues
Positive correlation of CENP-F expression with clinicopathologic features
Correlation between the clinicopathologic features and expression of CENP-F protein
Clinical stage (92 stage)
Spearman correlation analysis between CENP-F and clinicopathologic factors
CENP-F expression level
Inverse correlation of CENP-F expression with patients' survival
Univariate and multivariate analysis of different prognostic variables in patients with NPC by Cox regression analysis
HR (95% CI)
HR (95% CI)
Female vs. Male
III-IV vs. I-II
Yes vs. No
Expression of CENP-F
High vs. Low
ZOL Synergizes with cisplatin to enhance the cytotoxicity on CENP-F high expressing cells
We then evaluated the potential synergistic effects of the combination of ZOL and cisplatin by the Zheng-Jun Jin method. In HONE1 and 6-10B cells, synergy was seen after treatment with 2 μM ZOL (Q = 1.54 and Q = 1.30, respectively). In CNE1 and SUNE1 cells, additivity was seen after treatment with 2 μM ZOL (Q = 0.98, Q = 0.88, respectively), whereas in NPEC2 Bmi-1, only a marginal effect was observed (Q = 0.85). These results indicates that the growth inhibition activity of ZOL in combination with cisplatin in NPC cells was correlated with the expression level of CENP-F in the cells, and a synergistic interaction from combining ZOL and cisplatin was only observed in CENP-F high expression NPC cells (HONE1 and 6-10B).
FTI-277 Synergizes with cisplatin to enhance the cytotoxicity on high CENP-F expression cells
In this study, we revealed that CENP-F is upregulated in NPC cell lines and NPC specimens at both the mRNA and protein levels in comparison with noncancerous nasopharyngeal epithelial cells and tissues. Overexpression of CENP-F was significantly associated with advanced clinical stage, higher T classification, skull-base invasion, and distant metastasis. Moreover, as an independent prognostic factor, overexpression of CENP-F was inversely correlated with the prognosis of NPC patients. Additionally, we found that ZOL or FTI-277 could significantly enhance the chemosensitivity to cisplatin of NPC cell lines with high expression of CENP-F, but not in cell lines with low expression of CENP-F, suggesting that CENP-F is a potential target of ZOL or FTI-277 and expression of CENP-F has potential therapeutic implications in NPC chemotherapy.
Our study suggests that CENP-F plays an important role in the progression of NPC. Upregulation of CENP-F was identified at both the transcriptional and translational levels in NPC cell lines in comparison with a primary NPEC2 and an immortalized NPEC2 Bmi-1 cells. In addition, high levels of CENP-F were detected in approximately half (48.5%) of NPC lesions. The importance of CENP-F in the progression of NPC was further highlighted by our finding that it is correlated with advanced stages and T classification, which was in general agreement with other tumor types [17, 20, 25, 26]. Importantly, the current study was the first to identify an inverse correlation of CENP-F with skull-base invasion and distant metastasis, strongly suggesting that CENP-F could be used as a valuable factor to identify subsets of NPC patients with more aggressive tumors. Finally, our data show that the high expression of CENP-F correlates with poor prognosis and that the level of CENP-F is a potential independent prognostic factor for NPC, suggesting a function of CENP-F upregulation in the multistage pathogenesis of this disease. These findings are consistent with a previous study on breast cancer .
A large amount of data collected from human tumors suggests that chromosome instability (CIN) plays a causative role in a substantial proportion of malignancies and correlates with tumor grade and prognosis [27, 28]. CIN, which arises as a result of an abnormal mitosis, can occur because of alterations in mitotic timing, mitotic checkpoint control, or of microtubule or centrosome dynamics . CIN is commonly found in NPC and is thought to play a contributory role in tumor initiation and progression . Many kinetochore proteins are proved to be associated with CIN. CENP-E is required for efficient capture and attachment of spindle microtubules and responsible for mitotic checkpoint signal transduction [31, 32]. Evidence has shown CENP-E silencing leads CIN . Recent research has revealed that CENP-H was upregulated in primary human colorectal cancers, and ectopic overexpression of CENP-H correlated with chromosome missegregation and aneuploidy . We have previously shown that CENP-H was also upregulated in most NPC tissues . The overexpression of CENP-F could affect other centromere-kinetochore components and disrupt normal kinetochore function, consequently causing mitotic delay and lagging chromosomes. Those might contribute to chromosome instability and induce the progression of NPC. A study on primary breast cancer showed that CENP-F expression was associated with CIN, including cyclin E overexpression, nuclear expression of survivin, c-Myc amplification, aneuploid, and high telomerase activity and poor prognosis . Other studies in CENP-F depleted U2OS cells showed chromosome alignment defects, but the cells still proceeded through mitosis and became aneuploid . These results suggested that the relationship between kinetochore proteins may be crucial for appropriate localization and proper functioning of the kinetochore. Our study has also provided new insight into CIN in NPC. However, further studies are needed to clarify the possible link between the biological function of CENP-F and chromosome instability in NPC, which will provide important mechanistic understanding of the role of CENP-F in the development and progression of NPC.
In addition to serving as a potential prognostic biomarker, our in vitro findings suggest that CENP-F may have a therapeutic implication. Numerous studies in vitro have shown that ZOL exerts a direct cytotoxic effect on tumor cells via inhibition of cell growth and induction of cell apoptosis, in addition to its effect on osteoclasts [36, 37]. A recent study on breast cancer identified CENP-F as a potential new molecular target for ZOL, which can cause the loss of CENP-F from the kinetochore by inhibiting farnesylation and be involved in the antitumor effect by impairing correct chromosome separation . Interestingly, our results did not show a direct antitumor effect of ZOL alone even at concentrations of 50 μM, which were not achievable in vivo, either in immortalized NPEC2 Bmi-1 or in NPC cell lines. Those data indicate that ZOL alone cannot suppress the proliferation of NPC cells at clinically relevant concentrations. However, a synergistic effect was observed when cells were treated with cisplatin in combination with a clinically relevant concentration of ZOL in high CENP-F expression NPC cells. An additive effect was observed in medium CENP-F expression cells and only a marginal effect was observed in low CENP-F expressing immortalized cells. Likewise, the combination of FTI-277 with cisplatin has been shown to have similar synergistic effects against high CENP-F expression cells. These results suggest that the effects of combined treatments are correlated with high CENP-F expression. Moreover, we found ZOL or FTI-277 causes the reduction of CENP-F from the kinetochore, which is consistent with other reports in human breast cancer cells  and head and neck tumor samples . In addition, these results indicate that the inhibition of CENP-F might be involved in the synergistic interaction. However, the molecular mechanism underlying the synergistic effects in high CENP-F expression cells is not known, and further work is required in order to confirm this effect. Both CENP-E and CENP-F are found on the kinetochores alongside microtubules and specifically localize to the outer kinetochore plate during M-phase. A recent report has identified that an allosteric inhibitor of CENP-E motor activity can decrease CENP-E function and induce tumor cell apoptosis and tumor regression . Thus, it will be important to identify novel chemicals, which target CENP-F more specifically, in order to understanding of the role of CENP-F in the development and progression of NPC as well as for the development of a novel targeted therapy.
We found that CENP-F is overexpressed in NPC tissues and is positively correlated with the malignant status of NPC. High CENP-F expression is a significant prognostic factor indicating poor survival in NPC patients. Our in vitro findings suggest that combining cisplatin and ZOL has a synergistic effect only in high CENP-F expression NPC cells. CENP-F expression status may have important therapeutic implications for combination treatment and may be useful to stratify patients to decide on an effective strategy for anticancer therapy.
Clinicopathologic characteristics of 202 patients and expression of CENP-F
Histologic classification (WHO)
Clinical stage (92 stage)
Living status (at last follow-up)
Death from NPC
Expression of CENP-F
Zoledronic acid (ZOL) was supplied by Novartis Pharma AG (Stein, Switzerland). ZOL was dissolved in 0.9% NaCl solution as a 5 mM stock solution and stored at -20°C. FTI-277 was purchased from Sigma Chemical Co (St. Louis, MO, USA). The chemical was dissolved in DMSO at a concentration of 10 mM, and aliquots were stored at -20°C. The chemicals were diluted in fresh media before each experiment.
Primary NPEC2 cultures and immortalized NPEC2 induced with Bmi-1 were established as described previously , and grown in keratinocyte/serum-free medium (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). The NPC cell lines CNE1, CNE2, HNE1, HONE1, SUNE-1, 6-10B and C666 were maintained in RPMI 1640 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Hyclone, Logan, UT), penicillin (100 units/ml), and streptomycin (100 units/ml) at 37°C in a humidified 5% CO2 incubator.
Total RNA from different cell lines and human tissues were extracted using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). After reverse transcription of the total RNA, the first-strand cDNA was then used as a template for detecting of CENP-F expression. Real-time PCR and data collection were performed with an ABI PRISM 7900HT sequence detection system. The housekeeping gene GAPDH was used as an internal control to normalize the expression levels of CENP-F. The primer sequences are sense 5'- GTAGAGGACCAACACCTGCTACC-3', antisense 5'-GTCAGCAAACCCTTTCTTTACAACT-3' for CENP-F, and sense 5'-CTCCTCCTGTTCGACAGTCAGC-3', antisense 5'- CCCAATACGACCAAATCCGTT-3' for GAPDH. To ensure reproducibility of results, all genes were tested in triplicate.
Western blot analysis
Western blot analysis was performed as described previously . Briefly, cells were harvested and lysed in lysis buffer. The protein concentration was determined by the Bradford dye method (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA). Equal amounts of cell extract were subjected to electrophoresis in 4% SDS-PAGE and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ). The membrane was probed with an anti-CENP-F rabbit polyclonal antibody (1:1000; Bethyl Laboratories, Montgomery, TX). Expression of CENP-F was determined with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G (1:2000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) and enhanced chemiluminescence (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ) according to the manufacturer's suggested protocols. An anti-α-tubulin mouse monoclonal antibody (1:1000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) was used to confirm equal loading.
Immunohistochemical staining (IHC)
IHC staining was performed using the Dako Envision system (Dako, Carpinteria, CA) following the manufacturer's recommended protocols. All paraffin-embedded specimens were cut into 4 μm sections and baked for 1 h at 65°C. All sections were deparaffinized with xylenes and rehydrated with graded ethanol to distilled water. Sections were submerged in EDTA antigen retrieval buffer (pH 8.0) and microwaved for antigen retrieval. After being treated with 0.3% H2O2 for 15 min to block the endogenous peroxidase, the section were treated with normal goat serum for 30 min to reduce the nonspecific binding and then rabbit polyclonal anti-CENP-F antibody (1:200; Bethyl Laboratories) overnight at 4°C. After washing, the sections were incubated with biotinylated anti-rabbit secondary antibody (Zymed) followed by further incubation with streptavidin-horseradish peroxidase (Zymed) at 37°C for 30 min. For color reaction, diaminobenzidine (DAB) was used. For negative controls, the antibody was replaced by normal goat serum.
The immunohistochemically stained tissue sections were scored independently by two pathologists blinded to the clinical parameters. The final score for CENP-F was the average of the scores obtained by the two observers. Cases with major discrepancies in scoring (i.e., > 1) were reviewed by both observers on a multiheaded microscope. Based on previous studies [40, 41], we used the intensity and extent of the staining to assess CENP-F. The entire tissue section was observed to assign scores. The staining intensity was scored as 0 (no staining), 1 (weak staining exhibited as light yellow), 2 (moderate staining exhibited as yellow brown), or 3 (strong staining exhibited as brown). Extent of staining was scored as 0 (0%), 1 (1 to 25%), 2 (26 to 50%), 3 (51 to 75%), or 4 (76 to 100%), according to the percentages of the positive staining areas in relation to the whole carcinoma area or entire section for the normal samples. The sum of the intensity and extent scores was used as the final staining score (0 to 7) for CENP-F. For the purpose of statistical evaluation, tumors having a final staining score of < 3 were grouped into low CENP-F expression and those with scores ≥3 were grouped into high CENP-F expression.
In Vitro Cytotoxicity Assays
Cytotoxicity tests were evaluated by 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) assay. Cells were grown in 96-well microtiter plates at appropriate densities and allowed to adhere for 24 h before addition of ZOL or FTI-277 alone or cisplatin and ZOL or FTI-277 together. To determine the cytotoxicity of ZOL and FTI-277, cells were exposed to increasing concentrations ranging from 0.1 μM to 50 μM for 72 h. The absorbance was determined at 570 nm in a multi-detection microplate reader (SpectraMax M5). To test the effect of ZOL or FTI-277 on the chemosensitivity of immortalized NPEC and NPC cells, ZOL (2 μM) was added to the medium with various concentrations of cisplatin in NPEC2-Bmi-1, SUNE1, CNE1, HONE-1 and 6-10B, and FTI-277 (1 μM) was added in CNE1 and HONE1. The concentrations required to inhibit growth by 50% (IC50) were calculated from survival curves using the Bliss method . The results from the assays were analyzed for the combination effect between ZOL and cisplatin according to the Zheng-Jun Jin method . This method provides a Q value, where Q < 0.85 indicates antagonism, 0.85 ≤ Q < 1.15 indicates additivity and Q≥ 1.15 indicates synergism. The formula is Q = Ea+b/(Ea+Eb-Ea×Eb), where Ea+b, Ea and Eb are the average effects of the combination treatment, ZOL only and cisplatin only, respectively. All treatments were performed in quadruplicate and experiments were repeated three times.
Immunofluorescence analysis was performed as described previously . Cell lines were plated on culture slides (Costar, Cambridge, MA), treated with ZOL or FTI-277 for 24 h, then fixed in ice-cold acetone for 5 min at -20°C. The cells were blocked for 30 min in 10% BSA (Sigma-Aldrich St. Louis, MO) in PBS and then incubated with rabbit polyclonal anti-CENP-F antibody (1:200; Bethyl Laboratories) for 2 hours at room temperature. After three washes in PBS, the slides were incubated for 1 h in the dark with secondary goat anti-rabbit antibodies (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). After three further washes, the slides were stained with 4-,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; Sigma-Aldrich St. Louis, MO) for 5 min to visualize the nuclei, and examined using an Olympus confocal imaging system (Olympus FV100).
All statistical analyses were carried out using the SPSS 13.0 statistical software package. The significance of CENP-F mRNA levels and the MTT assays were determined by t-tests. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were used to analyze the relationship between CENP-F expression and clinicopathologic characteristics. Bivariate correlations between variables were calculated by Spearman's rank correlation coefficients. Survival curves were plotted by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed with the Cox proportional hazards regression model to analyze independent factors affecting prognosis. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
This study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (30630068 and 30872931), as well as grants from the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (No. 2007AA02Z477, 2006DAI02A11, and 2006AA02Z4B4).
- Jia WH, Huang QH, Liao J, Ye W, Shugart YY, Liu Q, Chen LZ, Li YH, Lin X, Wen FL: Trends in incidence and mortality of nasopharyngeal carcinoma over a 20-25 year period (1978/1983-2002) in Sihui and Cangwu counties in southern China. BMC Cancer. 2006, 6: 178- 10.1186/1471-2407-6-178PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hong MH, Mai HQ, Min HQ, Ma J, Zhang EP, Cui NJ: A comparison of the Chinese 1992 and fifth-edition International Union Against Cancer staging systems for staging nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer. 2000, 89: 242-247. 10.1002/1097-0142(20000715)89:2<242::AID-CNCR6>3.0.CO;2-ZView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lo KW, Huang DP: Genetic and epigenetic changes in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Semin Cancer Biol. 2002, 12: 451-462. 10.1016/S1044579X02000883View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yamashita S, Kondo M, Hashimoto S: Squamous cell carcinoma of the nasopharynx. An analysis of failure patterns after radiation therapy. Acta Radiol Oncol. 1985, 24: 315-320. 10.3109/02841868509136058View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bailet JW, Mark RJ, Abemayor E, Lee SP, Tran LM, Juillard G, Ward PH: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma: treatment results with primary radiation therapy. Laryngoscope. 1992, 102: 965-972.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fandi A, Altun M, Azli N, Armand JP, Cvitkovic E: Nasopharyngeal cancer: epidemiology, staging, and treatment. Semin Oncol. 1994, 21: 382-397.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bomont P, Maddox P, Shah JV, Desai AB, Cleveland DW: Unstable microtubule capture at kinetochores depleted of the centromere-associated protein CENP-F. Embo J. 2005, 24: 3927-3939. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600848PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Holt SV, Vergnolle MA, Hussein D, Wozniak MJ, Allan VJ, Taylor SS: Silencing Cenp-F weakens centromeric cohesion, prevents chromosome alignment and activates the spindle checkpoint. J Cell Sci. 2005, 118: 4889-4900. 10.1242/jcs.02614View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liao H, Winkfein RJ, Mack G, Rattner JB, Yen TJ: CENP-F is a protein of the nuclear matrix that assembles onto kinetochores at late G2 and is rapidly degraded after mitosis. J Cell Biol. 1995, 130: 507-518. 10.1083/jcb.130.3.507View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hussein D, Taylor SS: Farnesylation of Cenp-F is required for G2/M progression and degradation after mitosis. J Cell Sci. 2002, 115: 3403-3414.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Varis A, Salmela AL, Kallio MJ: Cenp-F (mitosin) is more than a mitotic marker. Chromosoma. 2006, 115: 288-295. 10.1007/s00412-005-0046-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ma L, Zhao X, Zhu X: Mitosin/CENP-F in mitosis, transcriptional control, and differentiation. J Biomed Sci. 2006, 13: 205-213. 10.1007/s11373-005-9057-3View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schafer-Hales K, Iaconelli J, Snyder JP, Prussia A, Nettles JH, El-Naggar A, Khuri FR, Giannakakou P, Marcus AI: Farnesyl transferase inhibitors impair chromosomal maintenance in cell lines and human tumors by compromising CENP-E and CENP-F function. Mol Cancer Ther. 2007, 6: 1317-1328. 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-06-0703View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brown HK, Ottewell PD, Coleman RE, Holen I: The kinetochore protein Cenp-F is a potential novel target for zoledronic acid in breast cancer cells. J Cell Mol Med. 2009Google Scholar
- Rattner JB, Rees J, Whitehead CM, Casiano CA, Tan EM, Humbel RL, Conrad K, Fritzler MJ: High frequency of neoplasia in patients with autoantibodies to centromere protein CENP-F. Clin Invest Med. 1997, 20: 308-319.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Erlanson M, Casiano CA, Tan EM, Lindh J, Roos G, Landberg G: Immunohistochemical analysis of the proliferation associated nuclear antigen CENP-F in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Mod Pathol. 1999, 12: 69-74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shigeishi H, Mizuta K, Higashikawa K, Yoneda S, Ono S, Kamata N: Correlation of CENP-F gene expression with tumor-proliferating activity in human salivary gland tumors. Oral Oncol. 2005, 41: 716-722. 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2005.03.008View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hui D, Reiman T, Hanson J, Linford R, Wong W, Belch A, Lai R: Immunohistochemical detection of cdc2 is useful in predicting survival in patients with mantle cell lymphoma. Mod Pathol. 2005, 18: 1223-1231. 10.1038/modpathol.3800409View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Konstantinidou AE, Korkolopoulou P, Kavantzas N, Mahera H, Thymara I, Kotsiakis X, Perdiki M, Patsouris E, Davaris P: Mitosin, a novel marker of cell proliferation and early recurrence in intracranial meningiomas. Histol Histopathol. 2003, 18: 67-74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- O'Brien SL, Fagan A, Fox EJ, Millikan RC, Culhane AC, Brennan DJ, McCann AH, Hegarty S, Moyna S, Duffy MJ: CENP-F expression is associated with poor prognosis and chromosomal instability in patients with primary breast cancer. Int J Cancer. 2007, 120: 1434-1443. 10.1002/ijc.22413View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shao JY, Zeng WF, Zeng YX: [Molecular genetic progression on nasopharyngeal carcinoma]. Ai Zheng. 2002, 21: 1-10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Li RP, Shao JY, Deng L, Zeng MS, Song LB, Li MZ, Wu QL: [Identification of differentially expressed genes in primary cultured nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells by cDNA microarray]. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2007, 27: 1156-1160.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Guigay J: Advances in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Curr Opin Oncol. 2008, 20: 264-269. 10.1097/CCO.0b013e3282fad846View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chen T, Berenson J, Vescio R, Swift R, Gilchick A, Goodin S, LoRusso P, Ma P, Ravera C, Deckert F: Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of zoledronic acid in cancer patients with bone metastases. J Clin Pharmacol. 2002, 42: 1228-1236. 10.1177/009127002762491316View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Koon N, Schneider-Stock R, Sarlomo-Rikala M, Lasota J, Smolkin M, Petroni G, Zaika A, Boltze C, Meyer F, Andersson L: Molecular targets for tumour progression in gastrointestinal stromal tumours. Gut. 2004, 53: 235-240. 10.1136/gut.2003.021238PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- de la Guardia C, Casiano CA, Trinidad-Pinedo J, Baez A: CENP-F gene amplification and overexpression in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Head Neck. 2001, 23: 104-112. 10.1002/1097-0347(200102)23:2<104::AID-HED1005>3.0.CO;2-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Carter SL, Eklund AC, Kohane IS, Harris LN, Szallasi Z: A signature of chromosomal instability inferred from gene expression profiles predicts clinical outcome in multiple human cancers. Nat Genet. 2006, 38: 1043-1048. 10.1038/ng1861View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kronenwett U, Huwendiek S, Ostring C, Portwood N, Roblick UJ, Pawitan Y, Alaiya A, Sennerstam R, Zetterberg A, Auer G: Improved grading of breast adenocarcinomas based on genomic instability. Cancer Res. 2004, 64: 904-909. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-03-2451View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schvartzman JM, Sotillo R, Benezra R: Mitotic chromosomal instability and cancer: mouse modelling of the human disease. Nat Rev Cancer. 2010, 10: 102-115. 10.1038/nrc2781View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wang X, Jin DY, Wong YC, Cheung AL, Chun AC, Lo AK, Liu Y, Tsao SW: Correlation of defective mitotic checkpoint with aberrantly reduced expression of MAD2 protein in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells. Carcinogenesis. 2000, 21: 2293-2297. 10.1093/carcin/21.12.2293View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mao Y, Desai A, Cleveland DW: Microtubule capture by CENP-E silences BubR1-dependent mitotic checkpoint signaling. J Cell Biol. 2005, 170: 873-880. 10.1083/jcb.200505040PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schaar BT, Chan GK, Maddox P, Salmon ED, Yen TJ: CENP-E function at kinetochores is essential for chromosome alignment. J Cell Biol. 1997, 139: 1373-1382. 10.1083/jcb.139.6.1373PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Putkey FR, Cramer T, Morphew MK, Silk AD, Johnson RS, McIntosh JR, Cleveland DW: Unstable kinetochore-microtubule capture and chromosomal instability following deletion of CENP-E. Dev Cell. 2002, 3: 351-365. 10.1016/S1534-5807(02)00255-1View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tomonaga T, Matsushita K, Ishibashi M, Nezu M, Shimada H, Ochiai T, Yoda K, Nomura F: Centromere protein H is up-regulated in primary human colorectal cancer and its overexpression induces aneuploidy. Cancer Res. 2005, 65: 4683-4689. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-3613View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liao WT, Song LB, Zhang HZ, Zhang X, Zhang L, Liu WL, Feng Y, Guo BH, Mai HQ, Cao SM: Centromere protein H is a novel prognostic marker for nasopharyngeal carcinoma progression and overall patient survival. Clin Cancer Res. 2007, 13: 508-514. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-1512View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Clezardin P, Ebetino FH, Fournier PG: Bisphosphonates and cancer-induced bone disease: beyond their antiresorptive activity. Cancer Res. 2005, 65: 4971-4974. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-0264View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Green JR: Bisphosphonates: preclinical review. Oncologist. 2004, 9 (Suppl 4): 3-13. 10.1634/theoncologist.9-90004-3View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wood KW, Lad L, Luo L, Qian X, Knight SD, Nevins N, Brejc K, Sutton D, Gilmartin AG, Chua PR: Antitumor activity of an allosteric inhibitor of centromere-associated protein-E. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 107: 5839-5844.Google Scholar
- Song LB, Zeng MS, Liao WT, Zhang L, Mo HY, Liu WL, Shao JY, Wu QL, Li MZ, Xia YF: Bmi-1 is a novel molecular marker of nasopharyngeal carcinoma progression and immortalizes primary human nasopharyngeal epithelial cells. Cancer Res. 2006, 66: 6225-6232. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-0094View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Soumaoro LT, Uetake H, Higuchi T, Takagi Y, Enomoto M, Sugihara K: Cyclooxygenase-2 expression: a significant prognostic indicator for patients with colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2004, 10: 8465-8471. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-0653View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Masunaga R, Kohno H, Dhar DK, Ohno S, Shibakita M, Kinugasa S, Yoshimura H, Tachibana M, Kubota H, Nagasue N: Cyclooxygenase-2 expression correlates with tumor neovascularization and prognosis in human colorectal carcinoma patients. Clin Cancer Res. 2000, 6: 4064-4068.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shi Z, Liang YJ, Chen ZS, Wang XW, Wang XH, Ding Y, Chen LM, Yang XP, Fu LW: Reversal of MDR1/P-glycoprotein-mediated multidrug resistance by vector-based RNA interference in vitro and in vivo. Cancer Biol Ther. 2006, 5: 39-47.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jin ZJ: About the evaluation of drug combination. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2004, 25: 146-147.PubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.