Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Review
  • Open Access

Novel insights on m6A RNA methylation in tumorigenesis: a double-edged sword

  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1 and
  • 1Email author
Contributed equally
Molecular Cancer201817:101

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12943-018-0847-4

  • Received: 20 February 2018
  • Accepted: 29 June 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

N6-methyladenosine (m6A), the most prevalent modification of mammalian RNA, has received increasing attention. Although m6A has been shown to be associated with biological activities, such as spermatogenesis modulation, cell spermatogenesis and pluripotency, Drosophila sex determination, and the control of T cell homeostasis and response to heat shock, little is known about its roles in cancer biology and cancer stem cells. Recent articles have noted that some genes have abnormal m6A expression after tumorigenesis, including genes ABS2, RARA, MYB, MYC, ADAM19 and FOX1. Abnormal changes in the m6A levels of these genes are closely related to tumour occurrence and development. In this review, we summarized the ‘dual edge weapon’ role of RNA methylation in the tumorigenesis. We discussed RNA methylation could lead to not only tumour progression but also tumour suppression. Moreover, we clarified that the abnormal changes in the m6A enrichment of specific loci contribute to tumour occurrence and development, thereby representing a novel anti-cancer strategy by restoration to balanced RNA methylation in tumour cells.

Keywords

  • RNA methylation
  • m6A
  • Tumorigenesis

Background

Approximately 100 different post-transcriptional chemical modifications are present in RNA among all living organisms [1]. N6-methyladenosine (m6A), one such modification, was identified in the 1970s as the most abundant internal chemical modification in eukaryotic mRNA [2]. Approximately 0.1–0.4% of adenosine nucleotides in isolated mammalian RNA are chemically modified [3]. Extensive m6A modifications are present in the RNA of plants and vertebrates, and these modifications also occur in the RNA of single-celled organisms, such as bacteria and yeast [2, 47]. m6A-based modifications occur at a consensus motif, RRm6ACH([G/A/U][G > A]m6 AC[U > A > C]) [8] (Fig. 1). Furthermore, m6A is mainly concentrated on stop codons, in 3′ untranslated regions (3’UTRs), and within internal long exons, based on detection with m6A-specific antibodies and high-throughput sequencing [9]. A multicomponent methyltransferase complex catalysing m6A formation was first reported in 1994 [10]. Subsequently, methyltransferase-like 3 (METTL3), which functions as an S-adenosyl methionine-binding protein, was the first protein found to possess methyltransferase capacity [11]. Later, other m6A methyltransferase components were gradually discovered in mammals, including Wilms tumour 1-associated protein (WTAP), methyltransferase-like 14 (METTL14), RNA binding motif protein 15 (RBM15), KIAA1429 and zinc finger CCCH-type containing 13 (ZC3H13) (‘writers’) [1215]. METTL3 and METTL14 form a stable complex in mammalian cells that accurately localizes at methylation sites by associating with WTAP [12]. The catalytic methylation activity of METTL14 is approximately 10 times that of METTL3, but WTAP has no catalytic methylation activity [12]. Recently, methyltransferase-like protein 16 (METTL16) was confirmed to be a m6A methyltransferase that methylates U6 spliceosomal RNA and interacts with the 3′-terminal RNA triple helix of metastasis-associated lung adenocarcinoma transcript 1(MALAT1) [16]. In 2011, the first demethylase fat mass and obesity-associated protein (FTO) was identified, demonstrating that m6A modifications on mRNA are reversible and dynamic [17]. FTO and alkB homologue 5 (ALKBH5) function as two kinds of demethylases (‘erasers’) and may target distinct sets of target mRNAs [18, 19]. Members of the YT521-B homology (YTH) domain family of proteins (YTHDF1, YTHDF2, YTHDF3, YTHDC1 and YTHDC2) have a conserved m6A-binding pocket and directly read m6A-mediated physiological effects [9, 2025]. Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein (HNRNP) proteins HNRNPA2B1 and HNRNPC selectively bind m6A-containing mRNAs to respond to physiological effects [26, 27]. These proteins influence mRNA processing by impacting functions such as mRNA splicing, export, and translation initiation [24, 26, 28]. Recently, insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA-binding proteins (IGF2BPs; including IGF2BP1/2/3) were found to recognize m6A RNA modifications, functioning as a distinct family of m6A readers [29]. In addition, fragile X mental retardation 1 (FMR1) and leucine rich pentatricopeptide repeat containing (LRPPRC) read m6A modifications on target loci and influence RNA behaviour [30] (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

The process of m6A RNA modification. The installation, removal and identification of m6A are performed by writers, readers, and erasers, respectively. Writers interact with a special sequence of RRACH in mRNA that produces catalytic action mediated by METTL3, METTL14, KIAA1429, ZC3H13, METTL16 and WTAP. m6A functions are received by some reader proteins: YT521-B homology (YTH) domain-containing protein, IGF2BP, FMR1, LRPPRC and the heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein (HNRNP) protein families. Two m6A eraser proteins are obesity-associated protein (FTO) and alkB homologue 5 (ALKBH5)

N6-methyladenosine represents one of the most common RNA modifications in eukaryotes, regulating RNA behaviours such as splicing or the ability to code diverse proteins [9, 2025]. Recently, aberrant m6A modification in the large internal exon of a tumour suppressor was shown to give rise to premature polyadenylation, leading to membrane associated guanylate kinase (MAGI3) inactivation [31]. In addition, m6A regulates other forms of RNA modification. There is a significant negative correlation between two distinct and abundant RNA modifications, m6A and adenosine-to-inosine (A-to-I), suggesting a previously underappreciated interplay between them [32]. N6-methyladenosine also affects the function of Long non-coding RNA (LincRNA). LincRNA 1281 is required for proper differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells, and this critical function relies on sufficient m6A modification [33]. m6A may also play a functional role by regulating histones and DNA. The homeostatic regulation of S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) synthesis in mammalian cells involves dynamic m6A modifications on the 3’UTR of methionine adenosyltransferase 2A (MAT2A) [34]. In this review, we will briefly introduce physiological activities related to m6A modification. Then, we will describe in detail the ability of m6A modifications, functioning as a double-edged sword, to play a regulatory role in tumorigenesis and development.

Physiologic functions of m6A modifications

The dynamic reversibility of m6A methylation suggests that it plays an important role in physiological processes. Studies have revealed that m6A modifications on mRNAs or non-coding RNAs play important roles in spermatogenesis, T cell homeostasis, Drosophila sex determination, heat shock responses, pluripotency and reprogramming, as well as other processes [27, 3539] (Table 1).
Table 1

m6A chemical modifications affect physiological function

Physiological activities

Genes involved

Description

Reference

Spermatogenesis

Plzf, Dnmt3b Id4 and Sohlh2

Deletion of m6A results in the dysregulation of spermatogenesis

[39]

T cell homeostasis

SOCS1, SOCS3 and CISH

Decreased m6A modification inhibits naive T cell proliferation and differentiation but maintains cell survival

[40]

Drosophila sex determination

Sxl

YT521-B reads the m6A modification of Sxl to promote Sxl alternative splicing, which determines female physiognomy

[38]

Heat shock response

Hsp105

Under heat shock stress, m6A is preferentially deposited at the 5’UTR of new stress-inducible transcripts, such as Hsp105 (HSPH1), and enhances cap-independent translation initiation

[28]

Somatic cell reprogramming and pluripotency of ESCs

Nanog, Sox2, Klf4 and c-Myc

High m6A modification levels accelerate mRNA degradation of these genes, which damages ESC self-renewal and somatic cell reprogramming

[37]

m6A modulates spermatogenesis

The process by which diploid spermatogonial stem cells (SSCs) produce haploid spermatozoa is called spermatogenesis [35]. m6A is reportedly present on the key regulatory factors of SSCs/progenitor cells, such as Plzf, Id4, Dnmt3b, and Sohlh2, which control the timing of transcript translation to coordinate normal protein generation, and this modification is essential for mammalian spermatogenesis [39]. m6A deletion resulted in the dysregulation of proliferation and differentiation factors of SSC/progenitor cells and SSC depletion [39].

m6A influences T cell homeostasis

Peripheral T cells are subject to complex and rigorous regulation, and the interleukin 7(IL-7)/signal transducer and activator of transcription 5(STAT5) signal axis is highly significant for maintaining naive T cell homeostasis and survival [36]. Decreased levels of m6A modification on the mRNAs of suppressor of cytokine signalling (SOCS) family genes have been reported to slow mRNA decay and increase protein expression levels (SOCS1, SOCS3 and CISH) in naive T cells [40]. Overexpression of SOCS1, SOCS3 and CISH leads to the inhibition of the downstream signal IL-7/STAT5, preventing naive T cell proliferation and differentiation while maintaining T cell survival [40]. Thus, m6A modifications are known to play an important role in T cell homeostasis.

m6A is involved in Drosophila sex determination

Mammalian m6A enzyme complexes include including WTAP, METTL14, RBM15, KIAA1429 and ZC3H13 [1215]. The corresponding m6A methylation enzyme analogues in Drosophila include inducer of meiosis 4 (Ime4), karyogamy protein 4 (KAR4), female-lethal(2)d(Fl(2)d) and virilizer(Vir) [11, 12, 4143]. The m6A reader protein YT521-B has been reported to read m6A modifications on Sxl to promote Sxl alternative splicing, which determines female physiognomy [38]. The ability of YT521-B to read m6A explains the importance of this modification in Drosophila sex determination through the selective splicing of Sxl [38].

High levels of m6A during the heat shock response

The heat shock response is a complex cellular reaction that causes significant changes in protein translation, folding and degradation, thereby mitigating toxic reactions caused by protein misfolding [44]. m6A and the heat shock response are linked because m6A is the most abundant mRNA post-transcriptional modification. A new report has revealed that m6A is preferentially deposited on the 5’UTR of new stress-inducible transcripts, such as Hsp105 (HSPH1), under heat shock stress, and that increased levels of m6A modification at the 5’UTR can enhance cap-independent translation initiation [28]. Thus, the mechanistic connection between 5’UTR methylation and cap-independent translation reveals links between the heat shock response and m6A [28].

m6A influences somatic cell reprogramming and maintains the pluripotency of embryonic stem cells (ESCs)

Epigenetic and epitranscriptomic networks play important roles in somatic cell reprogramming and the maintenance of ESC pluripotency [37]. A new study has revealed that zinc finger protein 217 (ZFP217) activates the transcription of key pluripotency genes and modulates m6A deposition on their transcripts [37]. ZFP217 depletion globally enhances m6A modification on Nanog, Sox2, Klf4, and c-Myc mRNAs to accelerate their degradation, thus damaging ESC self-renewal and somatic cell reprogramming [37]. This finding represents strong evidence of the close relationships between m6A and somatic cell reprogramming and the maintenance of ESC pluripotency.

Aberrant m6 A modification contributes to diversified tumours

Given the important role of RNA m6A modification in regulating gene expression and various biological processes [2], it is reasonable to speculate that aberrant m6A modification plays an important role in human carcinogenesis. However, knowledge of the mechanistic link between m6A and human carcinogenesis is rather limited. While investigations addressing this issue are still at an early stage, efforts are underway to explore the biological impacts of m6A modifications in cancer. We will summarize recent reports describing our understanding of the biological functions and underlying molecular mechanisms of m6A regulatory proteins in various types of cancer and explore new options for cancer treatment (Fig. 2 and Table 2).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

m6A modification functions as a ‘dual-edged sword’ in tumor progression. In AML, aberrant FTO, METTL14 and METTL3 lead to aberrant expression of the ASB2, RARA, MYC, MYB, BCL2, SP1 and PTEN genes through m6A modification, ultimately promoting tumorigenesis. In GSCs, aberrant METTL3, METTL14 and ALKBH5 lead to the aberrant expression of ADAM19 and FOXM1 through m6A modifications, ultimately promoting tumorigenesis. In HCC, aberrant METTL3 and METTL14 lead to the aberrant expression of SOCS2 and miR126 through m6A modifications, ultimately promoting tumorigenesis. In BCSCs, aberrant METTL3 leads to the aberrant expression of KLF4, NANOG and HBXIP through m6A modifications, ultimately promoting tumorigenesis. In cervical cancer, aberrant FTO leads to the aberrant expression of β-catenin

Table 2

Aberrant m6A modification plays an important role in tumorigenesis

Tumour Type

Gene involved

Gene function

Description

reference

Acute myeloid leukaemia

ASB2

RARA

Anti-oncogene

Elevated FTO leads to low levels of m6A on ASB2 and RARA at UTRs, which reduces the mRNA and protein levels of these two genes

[47]

MYB

MYC

Oncogene

METTL14 enhances m6A modification of MYB and MYC, which in turn leads to overexpression of MYB and MYC

[48]

BCL2

PTEN

Oncogene

Increased METTL3 in AML enhances m6A modification of BCL2 and PTEN, which leads to overexpression of BCL2 and PTEN

[50]

SP1

Oncogene

METTL3 binds to the promoter region of sp1 and enhances m6A modification and gene expression

[51]

Hepatocellular carcinoma

SOCS2

Anti-oncogene

High expression of METTL3 in human HCC leads to high m6A levels on SOCS2, causing the rapid degradation of SOCS2

[60]

microRNA126

Anti-oncogene

Decreased METTL14 reduces m6A modification levels and the expression of microRNA126

[61]

Glioblastoma stem cells

ADAM19

Oncogene

Low levels of METTL3 and METTL14 decrease m6A modification of ADAM19, which enhances the expression of ADAM19

[69]

FOXM1

Oncogene

High levels of ALKBH5 decrease m6A modification levels of FOXM1 and enhance the expression of FOXM1, which ultimately causes glioblastoma

[70]

Breast cancer

KLF4

NANOG

Oncogene

ZNF217 interacts with METTL3 and inhibits the m6A methylation of KLF4 and NANOG, which ultimately leads to high expression of KLF4 and NANOG

[74]

HBXIP

Oncogene

High levels of METTL3 enhance m6A modification of HBXIP, which accelerates HBXIP expression

[75]

MAGI3

Anti-oncogene

High levels of m6A modification in the large internal exon of MAGI3 promote the occurrence of breast cancer

[31]

Cervical cancer

β-catenin

Anti-oncogene

Upregulated FTO represses m6A modification of β-catenin and induces chemoradiotherapy resistance

[79]

Connection between m6A and acute myeloid leukaemia (AML)

AML is one of the most common haematopoietic malignancies and is associated with a high mortality and distinct genetic and molecular abnormalities that lead to unsatisfactory therapeutic effects [45, 46]. Only a small proportion of patients survive for more than 5 years with standard chemotherapies [45, 46]. Therefore, it is urgent and necessary to explore new treatments for AML based on a deep understanding of the mechanisms of AML occurrence and development.

FTO, an obesity risk-associated gene and the first m6A eraser to be identified, has been reported to play an important oncogenic role in haematopoietic cell transformation and AML [17, 47]. FTO levels in certain subtypes of AML (e.g., t(11q23)/MLL-rearranged, t(15;17), FLT3-ITD, and/or NPM1-mutated) are abnormally elevated, which leads to the downregulation of m6A levels on the UTRs of ASB2 and RARA [47]. These low levels of m6A reduce the mRNA and protein levels of these two genes [47]. FTO is not the only demethylase with a link with AML; METTL14 also plays an important oncogenic role in this disease by regulating its mRNA targets (e.g., MYB, MYC) through m6A modifications, which in turn leads to enhanced MYB and MYC expression and ultimately blocks myeloid differentiation [48]. Additionally, a new report has shown that FTO promotes the stability of MYC mRNA by inhibiting YTHDF2-mediated RNA decay, which is attributed to decreased m6A abundance on the 5′-terminal and internal exons of MYC mRNA, indicating that m6A modifications on different regions of the same mRNA transcript (e.g., MYC) lead to distinct fates [48, 49].

Furthermore, it has been reported that the presence of increased METTL3 levels in AML leads to higher m6A methylation levels of BCL2 and PTEN and promotes the translation of BCL2 and PTEN mRNA, which ultimately leads to tumour formation [50]. Recently, another study revealed that METTL3 binds to the promoter region of SP1 with the aid of transcription factor CEBPZ, which enhances m6A modification of SP1, strengthens SP1 gene expression, and ultimately leads to myeloid leukaemia [51]. In general, changes in m6A modification levels on ASB2, RARA, MYC, MYB, BCL2, SP1and PTEN eventually lead to the occurrence of AML [4750].

Aberrant m6A in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)

HCC is a major type of primary liver cancer, accounting for the 5th highest incidence of malignant tumours worldwide and causing more than 700,000 annual deaths [52]. The prevalence of hepatitis B and C viruses in Asia is the main cause of the high incidence of liver cancer in Asia [52]. Effective interventions are lacking, resulting in high HCC mortality due to metastasis and recurrence; thus, a deeper understanding of the molecular mechanism underlying the occurrence and development of HCC is required. Growing evidence suggests that the occurrence of liver cancer is a multistep process involving complex interactions between genetics, epigenetics and transcriptional changes [53]. Previous studies have shown that DNA hypermethylation occurs on CpG islands of the promoter regions of tumour suppressor genes, such as DLC1, TFPI-2, CDKN2A, and PTEN, ultimately affecting tumorigenesis and development [5456]. It was reported that high levels of the histone methyltransferases EZH2, SUV39H1, SETDB1 and G9a promote the development and metastasis of HCC via epigenetic silencing of critical tumour suppressor genes [5759]. In general, abnormal epigenetic modifications may be important factors in the development of liver cancer.

Many articles note that the development of liver cancer is associated with abnormal m6A modifications [60, 61]. The high expression of METTL3 in human HCC reportedly leads to increased m6A modification levels on the tumour suppressor SOCS2 [60]. Excessive m6A chemical modification of SOCS2 is read by YTHDF2, which accelerates the degradation of SOCS2 and eventually leads to the occurrence of HCC [60]. Another report has indicated that decreased METTL14 expression reduces m6A modification levels and the expression of microRNA126 (miR126) [61]. Low m6A modification levels on miR126 are recognized by DGCR8 and may ultimately promote liver carcinogenesis [61]. These articles strongly suggest that abnormal m6A modification plays an important role in the occurrence and development of HCC.

The foundation role of m6A in glioblastoma stem cells (GSCs)

Glioblastomas are primary brain tumours with a high degree of malignancy [62]. The median survival time after diagnosis is usually less than 15 months, even if diagnosis is combined with surgical resection, radiotherapy and chemotherapy [62, 63]. GSCs are a group of tumour stem cells with the ability to promote tumour growth and invasion, showing strong resistance to radiotherapy and chemotherapy; these characteristics are the main reasons for the poor prognosis of glioblastoma [6467]. Therefore, the issue of stem cell resistance should be explored and addressed to improve therapeutic approaches to glioblastoma [66, 68]. RNA epigenetics has become a rapidly developing field in biology and may be valuable for informing glioblastoma treatment.

A study showed that low levels of METTL3 or METTL14, key components of the RNA methyltransferase complex, lead to decreased m6A modification levels on ADAM19 and the enhanced expression of ADAM19 in GSCs, ultimately causing glioblastoma [69]. Low m6A modification levels on ADAM19 and high mRNA expression levels of ADAM19 may represent a promising target for anti-glioblastoma therapy [69]. Another study revealed that aberrant m6A modifications caused by high levels of ALKBH5, an m6A demethylase, are an obvious physiological abnormality of GSCs [70]. Decreased m6A modification levels of FOXM1 result in enhanced FOXM1 expression levels, which ultimately cause glioblastoma [70]. Aberrant m6A modifications caused by different mechanisms in GSCs strongly suggest that this modification is related to the occurrence and development of glioblastoma.

Abnormal m6A modification in breast cancer

Among all malignant tumours in women, breast cancer has the highest incidence and leads to the highest number of deaths [71, 72]. Although the therapeutic outcomes of early-stage breast cancer are relatively good, treatments for metastasis are not effective [73]. Given the high recurrence and mortality rate, the molecular mechanisms that regulate breast cancer phenotypes need to be carefully delineated and studied to design more effective therapies.

In breast cancer stem cells (BCSCs), ZNF217 has been reported to interact with METTL3 and inhibit the m6A methylation of KLF4 and NANOG, which ultimately leads to high expression of KLF4 and NANOG, thus promoting tumorigenesis [74]. Another report indicated that high m6A modification levels on hepatitis B X-interacting protein (HBXIP) and the overexpression of HBXIP caused by high METTL3 levels accelerate the proliferation of BCSCs [75]. In addition, a study revealed that high levels of m6A modification on MAGI3 lead to premature polyadenylation, switching its functional role from a tumour suppressor gene to a dominant-negative oncogene and ultimately promoting tumorigenesis of breast cancer [31]. The aberrant m6A modifications caused by different mechanisms in breast cancer prove that this modification is related to the occurrence and development of breast cancer.

Aberrant m6A modification in cervical cancer

Cervical cancer is one of the most common and destructive gynaecological malignancies [76]. Chemoradiotherapy is the major therapy used to treat cervical squamous cell carcinoma [77]. However, chemoradiotherapy resistance is the major cause of treatment failure. Therefore, it is necessary to further understand the molecular mechanisms underlying chemoradiotherapy resistance and explore novel therapeutic treatments for cervical squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) [78].

In CSCC, the expression of FTO is significantly higher than that in normal tissues, resulting in lower levels of m6A modification in β-catenin, which causes decreased expression of β-catenin and chemoradiotherapy resistance. The discovery of this mechanism suggests that MA2, a novel small molecular inhibitor of FTO, may increase the chemoradiotherapy sensitivity of CSCC [79].

METTL3 promotes the translation of oncogenes in human lung cancer

Lung cancer is one of the most common malignant tumours in humans, causing many deaths every year [80, 81]. The 5-year survival rate of lung cancer patients is still very low despite continuous improvement and progress in the diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer [82, 83]. Non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) accounts for 85% of all pathological types of lung cancer [82, 83]. Our attention should be focused on the abnormal molecular biological characteristics of NSCLC to find an effective treatment.

Many articles have reported that abnormal m6A modifications ultimately affect tumour development. However, one report indicated that in lung cancer, METTL3 associates with translation machinery and enhances the translation of target mRNA (RGFR and TAZ) independent of its methyltransferase activity [84]. Another report also indicated that miR-33a prohibits NSCLC cell proliferation by targeting METTL3, which suggests that miR-33a may be a potential molecule for therapy [85]. Moreover, post-translational modification of METTL3 has been revealed. For example, METTL3 is modified by SUMO1, and SUMOylation of METTL3 decreases m6A levels on mRNAs, which ultimately promotes the development of NSCLC [86].

m6A leads to the acceleration of tumour formation

In AML, upregulated m6A modification on MYB, MYC, BCL2, PTEN and SP1 results in enhancement of the binding capability and translational efficiency of onco-RNA and ribosomes, leading to tumorigenesis [4750]. Moreover, in hepatocellular carcinoma, the excessive m6A modification of the SOCS2 tumour suppressor gene reduces mRNA stability and accelerates its degradation, which causes tumour progression [60]. In addition, in breast cancer, upregulated m6A modification of HBXIP and MAGI3 results in tumour formation [31]. It is worth noting that excessive modification of MAGI3 leads to premature polyadenylation, switching its functional role from that of a tumour suppressor gene to a dominant-negative oncogene, ultimately promoting tumorigenesis [31]. In summary, RNA methylation triggers certain alterations to tumour-specific mRNA behaviour and results in changes in onco-protein expression and biologic activity, thereby accelerating the tumour progression.

m6A contributes to the inhibition of tumour development

In contrast, the aberrant decreased m6A modification levels on target loci can also disrupt normal RNA functions, which in turn restores normal m6A levels on these targets and ideally suppresses tumour formation. The FTO-mediated downregulation of m6A modification levels on ASB2 and RARA leads to the downregulation of these anti-oncogenes via RNA and protein degradation, leading to the promotion of tumorigenesis [47]. In hepatocellular carcinoma, the decreased m6A modification levels on microRNA126 influence its function as a ceRNA and disrupt its regulation of binding capability, thereby triggering the acceleration of tumour development [61].

Similarly, in GSCs, a long non-coding RNA FOXM1-AS directly binds to FOXM1 mRNA, enhancing the interaction between ALKBH5 and FOXM1 nascent transcripts and giving rise to reduced m6A modification levels and the overexpression of this oncogene [70]. Additionally, decreased m6A modification levels enhance the RNA stability of KLF4 and NANOG and ultimately contribute to tumour formation [74]. In summary, it has been revealed that decreased RNA methylation may participate in tumorigenesis. Therefore, a novel therapeutic strategy may involve tumour suppression via enhanced m6A modification to balance the transcription of these genes.

Conclusion

In summary, an increasing number of studies has shown that aberrant m6A modification is closely related to tumorigenesis, including AML, HCC, GSCs, breast cancer, cervical cancer and lung cancer [50, 60, 70, 75, 79]. Moreover, numerous genes modified by m6A have been revealed to play regulatory roles in tumour formation, such as BCL2, PTEN, SOCS2, FOXM1 and HBXIP [50, 60, 70, 75, 79]. In conclusion, m6A modification is a double-edged sword, over-modification of a target gene by m6A could result in altered RNA splicing and translational capability, leading to the acceleration of cancer formation, whereas the lack of m6A modification at other loci may also contribute to tumorigenesis.

Abnormal levels of m6A methylation may give rise to tumour progression. However, we should not ignore the notion that RNA methylation enzymes influence tumorigenesis in an m6A-independent manner. For example, in lung cancer, METTL3 directly associates with translation machinery and enhances the translation of target mRNA (RGFR and TAZ) independent of its methyltransferase activity [84].

This review updates our knowledge of the aberrant m6A methylation of diverse target loci and discusses its impact on tumour formation. Aberrant levels of m6A modification, such as increased or decreased levels, may alter RNA splicing, RNA-coding capability or onco- or tumour suppressor genes. To discover novel tumour therapies based on the evaluation of m6A modifications, it should be noted that m6A functions as a dual-edged weapon; thus, restoring ideal levels of m6A (rather than simply over-supplementing or over-silencing) holds great significance.

Notes

Abbreviations

3’UTRs: 

3′ untranslated regions

ADAM19

A disintegrin and metallopeptidase domain 19

ALKBH5: 

AlkB homologue 5

AML: 

Acute myeloid leukaemia

ASB2

Ankyrin repeat and SOCS box containing 2

A-to-I: 

Adenosine-to-inosine

BCL2

B cell leukaemia 2

BCSCs: 

Breast cancer stem cells

CDKN2A

Cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor 2A

CISH

Cytokine inducible SH2 containing protein

CSCC: 

Cervical squamous cell carcinoma

Dnmt3b

DNA methyltransferase 3B

ESCs: 

Embryonic stem cells

EZH2

Enhancer of zeste 2 polycomb repressive complex 2 subunit

Fl(2)d: 

Female-lethal(2)d

FMR1: 

Fragile X mental retardation 1

FOXM1

Forkhead box M1

FTO: 

Fat mass and obesity-associated protein

GSCs: 

Glioblastoma stem cells

HBXIP

Hepatitis B X-interacting protein

HCC: 

Hepatocellular carcinoma

HNRNP: 

Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein

Id4

Inhibitor of DNA binding 4

IGF2BPs: 

Insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA-binding proteins

IL-7

Interleukin 7

Ime4: 

Inducer of meiosis 4

KAR4: 

Karyogamy protein 4

Klf4

Kruppel like factor 4

KLF4

Kruppel like factor 4

LRPPRC: 

Leucine rich pentatricopeptide repeat containing

m6A: 

N6-methyladenosine

MAGI3

Membrane associated guanylate kinase

MAGI3

Membrane associated guanylate kinase, WW and PDZ

MALAT1

Metastasis-associated lung adenocarcinoma transcript 1

MAT2A

Methionine adenosyl transferase 2A

METTL14: 

Methyltransferase-like 14

METTL16: 

Methyltransferase-like protein 16

METTL3: 

Methyltransferase-like 3

MYB

Myeloblastosis oncogene

MYC

Myelocytomatosis oncogene

NANOG

Nanog homeobox

NSCLC: 

Non-small-cell lung carcinoma

Plzf

Promyelocytic leukaemia zinc finger

PTEN

Phosphatase and tensin homolog

RARA

Retinoic acid receptor alpha

RBM15: 

RNA binding motif protein 15

SAM: 

S-adenosylmethionine

SETDB

SET domain bifurcated 1

SOCS2

Suppressor of cytokine signaling 2

Sohlh2

Spermatogenesis and oogenesis specific basic helix-loop-helix 2

Sox2

Sex determining region Y box 2

SSCs: 

Spermatogonial stem cells

STAT5

Activator of transcription 5

SUMO1: 

Small ubiquitin-like modifier 1

SUV39H1

Suppressor of variegation 3–9 homolog 1

Sxl

Sex lethal

TFPI-2

Tissue factor pathway inhibitor 2

WTAP: 

Wilms tumour 1-associated protein

YTH: 

YT521-B homology

ZC3H13: 

Zinc finger CCCH-type containing 13

ZFP217

Zinc finger protein 217

ZNF217

Zinc finger protein 217

Declarations

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China grant (81602366, 81402258, 81570884), the Scientific Research Program of National Health and Family Planning Commission of China (201402014), the ShuGuang Project of Shanghai Municipal Education Commission and Shanghai Education Development Foundation (14SG18), and the Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai (17DZ2260100).

Authors’ contributions

RJ provided direction and guidance throughout the preparation of this manuscript. SW collected and interpreted studies and was a major contributor to the writing and editing of the manuscript. PC reviewed and made significant revisions to the manuscript. RJ assisted in the revision of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Ophthalmology, Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, People’s Republic of China

References

  1. Machnicka MA, Milanowska K, Osman Oglou O, Purta E, Kurkowska M, Olchowik A, Januszewski W, Kalinowski S, Dunin-Horkawicz S, Rother KM, et al. MODOMICS: a database of RNA modification pathways--2013 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41(Database issue):D262–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Desrosiers R, Friderici K, Rottman F. Identification of methylated nucleosides in messenger RNA from Novikoff hepatoma cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974;71(10):3971–5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Wei CM, Gershowitz A, Moss B. Methylated nucleotides block 5′ terminus of HeLa cell messenger RNA. Cell. 1975;4(4):379–86.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Krug RM, Morgan MA, Shatkin AJ. Influenza viral mRNA contains internal N6-methyladenosine and 5′-terminal 7-methylguanosine in cap structures. J Virol. 1976;20(1):45–53.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Sommer S, Salditt-Georgieff M, Bachenheimer S, Darnell JE, Furuichi Y, Morgan M, Shatkin AJ. The methylation of adenovirus-specific nuclear and cytoplasmic RNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1976;3(3):749–65.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Kennedy TD, Lane BG. Wheat embryo ribonucleates. XIII. Methyl-substituted nucleoside constituents and 5′-terminal dinucleotide sequences in bulk poly(AR)-rich RNA from imbibing wheat embryos. Can J Biochem. 1979;57(6):927–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Deng X, Chen K, Luo GZ, Weng X, Ji Q, Zhou T, He C. Widespread occurrence of N6-methyladenosine in bacterial mRNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43(13):6557–67.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Kane SE, Beemon K. Precise localization of m6A in Rous sarcoma virus RNA reveals clustering of methylation sites: implications for RNA processing. Mol Cell Biol. 1985;5(9):2298–306.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Dominissini D, Moshitch-Moshkovitz S, Schwartz S, Salmon-Divon M, Ungar L, Osenberg S, Cesarkas K, Jacob-Hirsch J, Amariglio N, Kupiec M, et al. Topology of the human and mouse m6A RNA methylomes revealed by m6A-seq. Nature. 2012;485(7397):201–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Bokar JA, Rath-Shambaugh ME, Ludwiczak R, Narayan P, Rottman F. Characterization and partial purification of mRNA N6-adenosine methyltransferase from HeLa cell nuclei. Internal mRNA methylation requires a multisubunit complex. J Biol Chem. 1994;269(26):17697–704.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Bokar JA, Shambaugh ME, Polayes D, Matera AG, Rottman FM. Purification and cDNA cloning of the AdoMet-binding subunit of the human mRNA (N6-adenosine)-methyltransferase. RNA. 1997;3(11):1233–47.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Liu J, Yue Y, Han D, Wang X, Fu Y, Zhang L, Jia G, Yu M, Lu Z, Deng X, et al. A METTL3-METTL14 complex mediates mammalian nuclear RNA N6-adenosine methylation. Nat Chem Biol. 2014;10(2):93–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Schwartz S, Mumbach MR, Jovanovic M, Wang T, Maciag K, Bushkin GG, Mertins P, Ter-Ovanesyan D, Habib N, Cacchiarelli D, et al. Perturbation of m6A writers reveals two distinct classes of mRNA methylation at internal and 5′ sites. Cell Rep. 2014;8(1):284–96.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Visvanathan A, Somasundaram K. mRNA traffic control reviewed: N6-Methyladenosine (m(6) A) takes the Driver’s seat. Bioessays. 2018;40(1)Google Scholar
  15. Wen J, Lv R, Ma H, Shen H, He C, Wang J, Jiao F, Liu H, Yang P, Tan L, et al. Zc3h13 regulates nuclear RNA m(6)A methylation and mouse embryonic stem cell self-renewal. Mol Cell. 2018;69(6):1028–38. e1026View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Ruszkowska A, Ruszkowski M, Dauter Z, Brown JA. Structural insights into the RNA methyltransferase domain of METTL16. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):5311.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Jia G, Fu Y, Zhao X, Dai Q, Zheng G, Yang Y, Yi C, Lindahl T, Pan T, Yang YG, et al. N6-methyladenosine in nuclear RNA is a major substrate of the obesity-associated FTO. Nat Chem Biol. 2011;7(12):885–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Gerken T, Girard CA, Tung YC, Webby CJ, Saudek V, Hewitson KS, Yeo GS, McDonough MA, Cunliffe S, McNeill LA, et al. The obesity-associated FTO gene encodes a 2-oxoglutarate-dependent nucleic acid demethylase. Science. 2007;318(5855):1469–72.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Zheng G, Dahl JA, Niu Y, Fedorcsak P, Huang CM, Li CJ, Vagbo CB, Shi Y, Wang WL, Song SH, et al. ALKBH5 is a mammalian RNA demethylase that impacts RNA metabolism and mouse fertility. Mol Cell. 2013;49(1):18–29.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Luo S, Tong L. Molecular basis for the recognition of methylated adenines in RNA by the eukaryotic YTH domain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(38):13834–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Wang X, Lu Z, Gomez A, Hon GC, Yue Y, Han D, Fu Y, Parisien M, Dai Q, Jia G, et al. N6-methyladenosine-dependent regulation of messenger RNA stability. Nature. 2014;505(7481):117–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Xu C, Wang X, Liu K, Roundtree IA, Tempel W, Li Y, Lu Z, He C, Min J. Structural basis for selective binding of m6A RNA by the YTHDC1 YTH domain. Nat Chem Biol. 2014;10(11):927–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Zhu T, Roundtree IA, Wang P, Wang X, Wang L, Sun C, Tian Y, Li J, He C, Xu Y. Crystal structure of the YTH domain of YTHDF2 reveals mechanism for recognition of N6-methyladenosine. Cell Res. 2014;24(12):1493–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Wang X, Zhao BS, Roundtree IA, Lu Z, Han D, Ma H, Weng X, Chen K, Shi H, He C. N(6)-methyladenosine modulates messenger RNA translation efficiency. Cell. 2015;161(6):1388–99.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Xiao W, Adhikari S, Dahal U, Chen YS, Hao YJ, Sun BF, Sun HY, Li A, Ping XL, Lai WY, et al. Nuclear m(6)A reader YTHDC1 regulates mRNA splicing. Mol Cell. 2016;61(4):507–19.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Alarcon CR, Goodarzi H, Lee H, Liu X, Tavazoie S, Tavazoie SF. HNRNPA2B1 is a mediator of m(6)A-dependent nuclear RNA processing events. Cell. 2015;162(6):1299–308.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Liu N, Dai Q, Zheng G, He C, Parisien M, Pan T. N(6)-methyladenosine-dependent RNA structural switches regulate RNA-protein interactions. Nature. 2015;518(7540):560–4.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Zhou J, Wan J, Gao X, Zhang X, Jaffrey SR, Qian SB. Dynamic m(6)A mRNA methylation directs translational control of heat shock response. Nature. 2015;526(7574):591–4.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Huang H, Weng H, Sun W, Qin X, Shi H, Wu H, Zhao BS, Mesquita A, Liu C, Yuan CL, et al. Recognition of RNA N(6)-methyladenosine by IGF2BP proteins enhances mRNA stability and translation. Nat Cell Biol. 2018;20(3):285–95.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Arguello AE, DeLiberto AN, Kleiner RE. RNA chemical proteomics reveals the N(6)-Methyladenosine (m(6)A)-regulated protein-RNA Interactome. J Am Chem Soc. 2017;139(48):17249–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Ni TK, Elman JS, Jin DX, Gupta PB, Kuperwasser C. Premature polyadenylation of MAGI3 is associated with diminished N6-methyladenosine in its large internal exon. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1)Google Scholar
  32. Xiang JF, Yang Q, Liu CX, Wu M, Chen LL, Yang L. N(6)-Methyladenosines Modulate A-to-I RNA Editing. Mol Cell. 2018;69(1):126–135.e126.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Yang D, Qiao J, Wang G, Lan Y, Li G, Guo X, Xi J, Ye D, Zhu S, Chen W, et al. N6-Methyladenosine modification of lincRNA 1281 is critically required for mESC differentiation potential. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46(8):3906–20.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Shima H, Matsumoto M, Ishigami Y, Ebina M, Muto A, Sato Y, Kumagai S, Ochiai K, Suzuki T, Igarashi K. S -Adenosylmethionine synthesis is regulated by selective N 6 -adenosine methylation and mRNA degradation involving METTL16 and YTHDC1. Cell Rep. 2017;21(12):3354–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Clermont Y. Kinetics of spermatogenesis in mammals: seminiferous epithelium cycle and spermatogonial renewal. Physiol Rev. 1972;52(1):198–236.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Takada K, Jameson SC. Naive T cell homeostasis: from awareness of space to a sense of place. Nat Rev Immunol. 2009;9(12):823–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Aguilo F, Zhang F, Sancho A, Fidalgo M, Di Cecilia S, Vashisht A, Lee DF, Chen CH, Rengasamy M, Andino B, et al. Coordination of m(6)A mRNA methylation and gene transcription by ZFP217 regulates pluripotency and reprogramming. Cell Stem Cell. 2015;17(6):689–704.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Haussmann IU, Bodi Z, Sanchez-Moran E, Mongan NP, Archer N, Fray RG, Soller M. m(6)A potentiates Sxl alternative pre-mRNA splicing for robust Drosophila sex determination. Nature. 2016;540(7632):301–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Lin Z, Hsu PJ, Xing X, Fang J, Lu Z, Zou Q, Zhang KJ, Zhang X, Zhou Y, Zhang T, et al. Mettl3−/Mettl14-mediated mRNA N(6)-methyladenosine modulates murine spermatogenesis. Cell Res. 2017;27(10):1216–30.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Li HB, Tong J, Zhu S, Batista PJ, Duffy EE, Zhao J, Bailis W, Cao G, Kroehling L, Chen Y, et al. m(6)A mRNA methylation controls T cell homeostasis by targeting the IL-7/STAT5/SOCS pathways. Nature. 2017;548(7667):338–42.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Penalva LO, Ruiz MF, Ortega A, Granadino B, Vicente L, Segarra C, Valcarcel J, Sanchez L. The Drosophila fl(2)d gene, required for female-specific splicing of Sxl and tra pre-mRNAs, encodes a novel nuclear protein with a HQ-rich domain. Genetics. 2000;155(1):129–39.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Niessen M, Schneiter R, Nothiger R. Molecular identification of virilizer, a gene required for the expression of the sex-determining gene sex-lethal in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 2001;157(2):679–88.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Horiuchi K, Kawamura T, Iwanari H, Ohashi R, Naito M, Kodama T, Hamakubo T. Identification of Wilms’ tumor 1-associating protein complex and its role in alternative splicing and the cell cycle. J Biol Chem. 2013;288(46):33292–302.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Fang NN, Chan GT, Zhu M, Comyn SA, Persaud A, Deshaies RJ, Rotin D, Gsponer J, Mayor T. Rsp5/Nedd4 is the main ubiquitin ligase that targets cytosolic misfolded proteins following heat stress. Nat Cell Biol. 2014;16(12):1227–37.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Marcucci G, Mrozek K, Bloomfield CD. Molecular heterogeneity and prognostic biomarkers in adults with acute myeloid leukemia and normal cytogenetics. Curr Opin Hematol. 2005;12(1):68–75.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Chen J, Odenike O, Rowley JD. Leukaemogenesis: more than mutant genes. Nat Rev Cancer. 2010;10(1):23–36.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Li Z, Weng H, Su R, Weng X, Zuo Z, Li C, Huang H, Nachtergaele S, Dong L, Hu C, et al. FTO plays an oncogenic role in acute myeloid leukemia as a N(6)-Methyladenosine RNA demethylase. Cancer Cell. 2017;31(1):127–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Weng H, Huang H, Wu H, Qin X, Zhao BS, Dong L, Shi H, Skibbe J, Shen C, Hu C, et al. METTL14 inhibits hematopoietic stem/progenitor differentiation and promotes Leukemogenesis via mRNA m(6)A modification. Cell Stem Cell. 2017Google Scholar
  49. Su R, Dong L, Li C, Nachtergaele S, Wunderlich M, Qing Y, Deng X, Wang Y, Weng X, Hu C, et al. R-2HG exhibits anti-tumor activity by targeting FTO/m(6)A/MYC/CEBPA signaling. Cell. 2018;172(1–2):90–105. e123View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Vu LP, Pickering BF, Cheng Y, Zaccara S, Nguyen D, Minuesa G, Chou T, Chow A, Saletore Y, MacKay M, et al. The N(6)-methyladenosine (m(6)A)-forming enzyme METTL3 controls myeloid differentiation of normal hematopoietic and leukemia cells. Nat Med. 2017;23(11):1369–76.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Barbieri I, Tzelepis K, Pandolfini L, Shi J, Millan-Zambrano G, Robson SC, Aspris D, Migliori V, Bannister AJ, Han N, et al. Promoter-bound METTL3 maintains myeloid leukaemia by m(6)A-dependent translation control. Nature. 2017;552(7683):126–31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Bosch FX, Ribes J, Borras J. Epidemiology of primary liver cancer. Semin Liver Dis. 1999;19(3):271–85.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Schulze K, Imbeaud S, Letouze E, Alexandrov LB, Calderaro J, Rebouissou S, Couchy G, Meiller C, Shinde J, Soysouvanh F, et al. Exome sequencing of hepatocellular carcinomas identifies new mutational signatures and potential therapeutic targets. Nat Genet. 2015;47(5):505–11.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  54. Wong CM, Lee JM, Ching YP, Jin DY, Ng IO. Genetic and epigenetic alterations of DLC-1 gene in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2003;63(22):7646–51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Wong CM, Ng YL, Lee JM, Wong CC, Cheung OF, Chan CY, Tung EK, Ching YP, Ng IO. Tissue factor pathway inhibitor-2 as a frequently silenced tumor suppressor gene in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2007;45(5):1129–38.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Villanueva A, Portela A, Sayols S, Battiston C, Hoshida Y, Mendez-Gonzalez J, Imbeaud S, Letouze E, Hernandez-Gea V, Cornella H, et al. DNA methylation-based prognosis and epidrivers in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2015;61(6):1945–56.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Au SL, Wong CC, Lee JM, Fan DN, Tsang FH, Ng IO, Wong CM. Enhancer of zeste homolog 2 epigenetically silences multiple tumor suppressor microRNAs to promote liver cancer metastasis. Hepatology. 2012;56(2):622–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Fan DN, Tsang FH, Tam AH, Au SL, Wong CC, Wei L, Lee JM, He X, Ng IO, Wong CM. Histone lysine methyltransferase, suppressor of variegation 3-9 homolog 1, promotes hepatocellular carcinoma progression and is negatively regulated by microRNA-125b. Hepatology. 2013;57(2):637–47.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Wei L, Chiu DK, Tsang FH, Law CT, Cheng CL, Au SL, Lee JM, Wong CC, Ng IO, Wong CM. Histone methyltransferase G9a promotes liver cancer development by epigenetic silencing of tumor suppressor gene RARRES3. J Hepatol. 2017;67(4):758–69.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Chen M, Wei L, Law CT, Tsang FH, Shen J, Cheng CL, Tsang LH, Ho DW, Chiu DK, Lee JM, et al. RNA N6-methyladenosine methyltransferase METTL3 promotes liver cancer progression through YTHDF2 dependent post-transcriptional silencing of SOCS2. Hepatology. 2017Google Scholar
  61. Ma JZ, Yang F, Zhou CC, Liu F, Yuan JH, Wang F, Wang TT, Xu QG, Zhou WP, Sun SH. METTL14 suppresses the metastatic potential of hepatocellular carcinoma by modulating N(6) -methyladenosine-dependent primary MicroRNA processing. Hepatology. 2017;65(2):529–43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Johnson DR, O'Neill BP. Glioblastoma survival in the United States before and during the temozolomide era. J Neuro-Oncol. 2012;107(2):359–64.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. Stupp R, Hegi ME, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ, Taphoorn MJ, Janzer RC, Ludwin SK, Allgeier A, Fisher B, Belanger K, et al. Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomised phase III study: 5-year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trial. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10(5):459–66.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Singh SK, Hawkins C, Clarke ID, Squire JA, Bayani J, Hide T, Henkelman RM, Cusimano MD, Dirks PB. Identification of human brain tumour initiating cells. Nature. 2004;432(7015):396–401.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Bao S, Wu Q, McLendon RE, Hao Y, Shi Q, Hjelmeland AB, Dewhirst MW, Bigner DD, Rich JN. Glioma stem cells promote radioresistance by preferential activation of the DNA damage response. Nature. 2006;444(7120):756–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Godlewski J, Newton HB, Chiocca EA, Lawler SE. MicroRNAs and glioblastoma; the stem cell connection. Cell Death Differ. 2010;17(2):221–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Sundar SJ, Hsieh JK, Manjila S, Lathia JD, Sloan A. The role of cancer stem cells in glioblastoma. Neurosurg Focus. 2014;37(6):E6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Allegra A, Alonci A, Penna G, Innao V, Gerace D, Rotondo F, Musolino C. The cancer stem cell hypothesis: a guide to potential molecular targets. Cancer Investig. 2014;32(9):470–95.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  69. Cui Q, Shi H, Ye P, Li L, Qu Q, Sun G, Sun G, Lu Z, Huang Y, Yang CG, et al. m(6)A RNA methylation regulates the self-renewal and tumorigenesis of glioblastoma stem cells. Cell Rep. 2017;18(11):2622–34.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  70. Zhang S, Zhao BS, Zhou A, Lin K, Zheng S, Lu Z, Chen Y, Sulman EP, Xie K, Bogler O, et al. m(6)A demethylase ALKBH5 maintains tumorigenicity of glioblastoma stem-like cells by sustaining FOXM1 expression and cell proliferation program. Cancer Cell. 2017;31(4):591–606. e596View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  71. DeSantis CE, Bray F, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Anderson BO, Jemal A. International variation in female breast Cancer incidence and mortality rates. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2015;24(10):1495–506.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  72. DeSantis CE, Ma J, Goding Sauer A, Newman LA, Jemal A. Breast cancer statistics, 2017, racial disparity in mortality by state. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67(6):439–48.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. O'Shaughnessy J. Extending survival with chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer. Oncologist. 2005;10(Suppl 3):20–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Zhang C, Zhi WI, Lu H, Samanta D, Chen I, Gabrielson E, Semenza GL. Hypoxia-inducible factors regulate pluripotency factor expression by ZNF217- and ALKBH5-mediated modulation of RNA methylation in breast cancer cells. Oncotarget. 2016;7(40):64527–42.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  75. Cai X, Wang X, Cao C, Gao Y, Zhang S, Yang Z, Liu Y, Zhang X, Zhang W, Ye L. HBXIP-elevated methyltransferase METTL3 promotes the progression of breast cancer via inhibiting tumor suppressor let-7g. Cancer Lett. 2018;415:11–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Small W Jr, Bacon MA, Bajaj A, Chuang LT, Fisher BJ, Harkenrider MM, Jhingran A, Kitchener HC, Mileshkin LR, Viswanathan AN, et al. Cervical cancer: a global health crisis. Cancer. 2017;123(13):2404–12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Verma J, Monk BJ, Wolfson AH. New strategies for multimodality therapy in treating locally advanced cervix Cancer. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2016;26(4):344–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Tewari KS, Monk BJ. New strategies in advanced cervical cancer: from angiogenesis blockade to immunotherapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20(21):5349–58.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Zhou S, Bai ZL, Xia D, Zhao ZJ, Zhao R, Wang YY, Zhe H. FTO regulates the chemo-radiotherapy resistance of cervical squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) by targeting beta-catenin through mRNA demethylation. Mol Carcinog. 2018;57(5):590–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Molina JR, Yang P, Cassivi SD, Schild SE, Adjei AA. Non-small cell lung cancer: epidemiology, risk factors, treatment, and survivorship. Mayo Clin Proc. 2008;83(5):584–94.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  81. Hussain S. Nanomedicine for treatment of lung Cancer. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2016;890:137–47.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Araz O, Ucar EY, Meral M, Yalcin A, Acemoglu H, Dogan H, Karaman A, Aydin Y, Gorguner M, Akgun M. Frequency of class I and II HLA alleles in patients with lung cancer according to chemotherapy response and 5-year survival. Clin Respir J. 2015;9(3):297–304.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Latimer KM, Mott TF. Lung cancer: diagnosis, treatment principles, and screening. Am Fam Physician. 2015;91(4):250–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Lin S, Choe J, Du P, Triboulet R, Gregory RI. The m(6)A methyltransferase METTL3 promotes translation in human Cancer cells. Mol Cell. 2016;62(3):335–45.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  85. Du M, Zhang Y, Mao Y, Mou J, Zhao J, Xue Q, Wang D, Huang J, Gao S, Gao Y. MiR-33a suppresses proliferation of NSCLC cells via targeting METTL3 mRNA. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2017;482(4):582–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Du Y, Hou G, Zhang H, Dou J, He J, Guo Y, Li L, Chen R, Wang Y, Deng R, et al. SUMOylation of the m6A-RNA methyltransferase METTL3 modulates its function. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46(10):5195–208.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Advertisement