Skip to main content
Download PDF

Autophagy-associated circRNA circCDYL augments autophagy and promotes breast cancer progression

Molecular Cancer volume 19, Article number: 65 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Although both circular RNAs (circRNAs) and autophagy are associated with the function of breast cancer (BC), whether circRNAs regulate BC progression via autophagy remains unknown. In this study, we aim to explore the regulatory mechanisms and the clinical significance of autophagy-associated circRNAs in BC.

Methods

Autophagy associated circRNAs were screened by circRNAs deep sequencing and validated by qRT-PCR in BC tissues with high- and low- autophagic level. The biological function of autophagy associated circRNAs were assessed by plate colony formation, cell viability, transwells, flow cytometry and orthotopic animal models. For mechanistic study, RNA immunoprecipitation, circRNAs pull-down, Dual luciferase report assay, Western Blot, Immunofluorescence and Immunohistochemical staining were performed.

Results

An autophagy associated circRNA circCDYL was elevated by 3.2 folds in BC tissues as compared with the adjacent non-cancerous tissues, and circCDYL promoted autophagic level in BC cells via the miR-1275-ATG7/ULK1 axis; Moreover, circCDYL enhanced the malignant progression of BC cells in vitro and in vivo. Clinically, increased circCDYL in the tumor tissues and serum of BC patients was associated with higher tumor burden, shorter survival and poorer clinical response to therapy.

Conclusions

circCDYL promotes BC progression via the miR-1275-ATG7/ULK1-autophagic axis and circCDYL could act as a potential prognostic and predictive molecule for breast cancer patients.

Background

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common malignancy in women worldwide [1]. Though BC patients have favorable prognosis due to recent advances in early diagnosis and effective treatment, recurrence or metastasis remained to threaten survival. Autophagy is a conserved ubiquitous process and energy recycling system that delivers damaged organelles, misfolded proteins and intracellular constituents to lysosomes for degradation [2]. Dysregulation of autophagy causes various pathological behaviors in eukaryotic cells and promotes progression of diseases [3], including cancer [4,5,6]. Autophagy provides energy for cancer cells in stress condition (i.e. hypoxia, starvation) and helps sustain their survival [7]. It has been reported that autophagy promotes survival, proliferation, metastasis, and invasion of BC cells via regulating autophagy associated genes and non-coding RNAs [4, 8,9,10,11,12]. However, the underlying mechanisms, especially non-coding RNAs, in regulating autophagy of BC progression are not yet fully elucidated.

Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are a class of novel RNAs with covalently closed loop structure without 5′ caps and 3′ tails [13]. Due to its loop structure, circRNAs are resistant to exonuclease, so they are much more stable than their parental linear RNAs and are abundant in mammalian cells [14]. circRNAs display disease-specific and development stage-specific characteristics under different pathologic environments [15,16,17], which suggests that circRNAs can be used as potential biomarkers for diagnosis and therapy [18, 19]. Several studies demonstrated that circRNAs could act as miRNA sponges [7, 20,21,22,23], and circRNAs with intronic sequence could regulate transcription of parental genes by interacting with RNA polymerase II in the nucleus [24, 25], while certain circRNAs exhibited the ability to translate proteins [26,27,28].

The most frequently reported mechanism of circRNAs is to trap miRNAs, known as miRNA sponge, leading to functional loss of target miRNAs and subsequent upregulation of miRNA-targeted genes. circRNAs exhibit powerful potential in regulating the biological functions of BC cells, including proliferation, migration, invasion [29,30,31]. Recently, some publications reported correlations between circRNAs and autophagy in many diseases such as thyroid cancer, myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury and sciatic nerve injury [10, 32, 33]. For example, circ-Dnmt1 promoted the proliferation of BC cells via autophagy by interfering with the nuclear localization of p53 and AUF1 [10]. Nevertheless, the relationship between circRNAs and autophagy in breast cancer, as well as the role of autophagy-associated circRNAs in clinical diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer remain largely illusive.

In this study, by using deep sequencing in BC tissues, we identified an autophagy associated circRNA circCDYL, which was increased up to 3.2 folds in BC tissues than that of adjacent non-cancerous tissues. Although circCDYL is reported to be highly expressed in hepatocellular carcinoma [34], bladder cancer [35] and breast cancer [36], the functional role of circCDYL in breast cancer still remains unknown. Herein, we found that BC patients with higher circCDYL in the serum or tumor tissues had shorter survival and poorer clinical response to therapy. We further revealed that circCDYL promoted autophagy level via sponging miR-1275 and up-regulated the expression of autophagy-associated gene ATG7 and ULK1. We demonstrated that circCDYL promoted BC progression via autophagy both in vitro and in vivo.

Material and methods

Patient samples and clinical database

In this study, three independent cohorts of BC patients from Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital (SYSMH) were enrolled. Breast cancer patients (aged 32 to 81) without any distant metastasis at first diagnosis between 1 June 2004 and 31 May 2018 were enrolled as Cohort 1 (n = 113). Paraffin-embedded BC tissue samples and paired non-tumor tissue samples in Cohort 1 were collected for in situ hybridization (ISH), immunohistochemical staining (IHC) or immunofluorescence (IF). In addition, serum samples from two other cohorts of SYSMH were collected for droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) detection (Cohort 2 was a retrospective cohort collected from 1 March 2017 to 30 September 2017, containing 14 benign patients, 30 early breast cancer (EBC) patients and 18 metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients; Cohort 3 was a prospective cohort from 1 June 2015 to 1 April 2019, in which only MBC patients at first diagnosis were enrolled). This work was approved by Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital Ethics Committee (SYSY-KY-KS-2018-05).

Autophagosome detection in cell lines and paraffin-embedded section of tissues

LC3 (MAP 1LC3B, Microtubule Associated Protein 1 Light Chain 3 Beta) is a recognized autophagic marker. During the formation of autophagosomes, cytosolic LC3 (LC3-I) would be enzymatically cleaved and form membrane-bound LC3 (LC3-II), which mainly locates in autophagosomes. Therefore LC3-II is a hallmark for autophagosome formation. In our study, mCherry-GFP-LC3-labeled MDA-MB-231 was used to visualize autophagosome and autolysosome. Since GFP is quenched in autolysosome, green dots of unmerged pictures reflect only autophagosomes, while red dots pictures reflect both autophagosomes and autolysosomes. Therefore, yellow and red dots of the merged picture reflect autophagosomes and autolysosomes, respectively. For the immunofluorescence on paraffin-embedded sections of human or animal tissue, the LC3 antibody were used to detect the autophagosomes, which could be seen as LC3 dots. Autophagosomes of cell lines or tissue sections were observed under confocal microscope in five random fields and the average number of autophagic dots in each cell were calculated to represent its autophagic level.

circRNA pull-down

circRNA pull-down was performed using biotinylated circCDYL probe, linear CDYL probe and negative control (NC) probe (Sangon Biotech, China) based on protocols from previous literatures [32, 37]. Briefly, MDA-MB-231 was fixed with 1% formaldehyde for 30 mins and lysed by co-IP buffer. The mixture was sonicated at high amplitude for 30 cycles of 30 s (on/off) pulses. Then the circCDYL-specific and NC biotinylated probes were added to the supernatant and the mixtures were incubated overnight at 37 °C. Next, the mixture was incubated with C1 streptavidin magnetic beads for 30 min at 37 °C. Finally, total RNA in the solution was extracted followed by qRT-PCR detection of circCDYL, linear CDYL RNA and miR-1275.

Dual luciferase reporter assay

Full-length sequence with wild-type or mutant sites of circCDYL and linear CDYL were designed and inserted into psiCHECK-2 vectors (Synbio-tech, Guangzhou, China). psiCHECK-2 vectors carrying NC mimic or miR-1275 mimic were co-transfected to HEK-293 T cells respectively. After 48 h transfection, luciferase activity of the transfected cells was detected by the dual-luciferase reporter assay system (Vazyme, Nanjing, China).

In vivo breast cancer orthotopic model

The animal experiments were performed by Forevergen Medical Corporation (Guangzhou, China), and all experimental procedures and animal care were in accordance with the ethical guidelines of the institution. 4-week-old female Balb/c nude mice were purchased from Nanjing Biomedical Research Institute of Nanjing University (Nanjing, China). Luciferase-labeled MDA-MB-231 cells (1X 106) transduced with sh-NC or sh-circCDYL lentivirus (sh-circCDYL-1 or sh-circCDYL-2) were directly injected into the fourth left mammary fat pads of the nude mice (n = 6/group). The tumor size was measured every 3 days by using Vernier caliper. When the tumor volume of sh-NC group reached 1000 mm3, mice were given D-luciferin (300 mg/kg; i.p.; 10 mins prior to imaging), anaesthetized with 3% isoflurane and imaged with a Xenogen IVIS Lumina system (Caliper Life Sciences, Hopkinton, MA). The mice were then sacrificed and the tumors were resected for IHC staining, ISH and IF.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 5 software. Student’s t-test or one-way ANOVA was performed to test differences between groups in both in vivo and in vitro experiments. X2-test was applied to analyze the correlations between circCDYL expression and clinicopathological characterization of BC patients. Kaplan-Meier plots and Log-rank tests were used for survival analysis. The univariate analyses were analyzed by Cox proportional hazards model. The correlations were analyzed using Pearson’s correlation coefficients. P <  0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Additional material and methods

Additional materials and methods can be found in Supplementary Information.

Results

Identification of autophagy-associated circRNAs in breast cancer

In order to determine the clinical significance of autophagy in breast cancer, the expression of LC3 detected by IHC in breast cancer patients was analyzed in Cohort 1. The median value of LC3 level was used as a cut-off value to divide these patients into LC3High and LC3Low subgroups. Survival analysis revealed that patients in LC3High subgroup had a poorer disease-free survival (DFS) than LC3Low subgroup (HR 2.069, 95% CI 1.059–4.044, P = 0.033, Fig. S1A). However, IHC staining on tumor section only reflected the total protein expression level of LC3, but not LC3-II (An acknowledged hallmark of autophagosome). Therefore, detecting LC3 dots by immunofluorescence (IF) was visible and allowed us to calculate autophagosomes. The median number of LC3 dots was used as a cut-off value to divide Cohort 1 into LC3-dotsMore and LC3-dotsLess subgroups. Survival analysis showed that LC3-dotsMore subgroup had a poorer DFS (HR 3.095, 95% CI 1.577–6.073, P = 0.01, Fig. 1a). These results indicated that autophagy plays an important role in breast cancer progression.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Autophagy-associated circRNA (circCDYL) expression profile in breast cancer. a The association between LC3 dots and disease-free survival (DFS) in 113 breast cancer patients from Cohort 1 of SYSMH. b circRNA expression profile in breast cancer patients with more and less LC3 dots by circRNA deep sequencing. c Expression of circCDYL in breast cancer tissue with more (n = 23) and less (n = 22) LC3 dots by qRT-PCR. d The relative expression of circCDYL under hypoxic condition (0.2% O2) at various time points (0, 24, 48 h) (left) and EBSS starvation induction at various time points (0, 2, 4, 6 h) (right) in MDA-MB-231 cells

Full size image

To further screen autophagy-associated circRNAs in breast cancer, circRNAs deep sequencing was performed to compare the difference of circRNAs profiles in primary BC tissues with more (LC3-dotsMore, n = 5) and less (LC3-dotsLess, n = 5) LC3 dots (Fig. 1b). 38 circRNAs candidates were selected based on the following standards: (i) fold change > 2; (ii) Junction reads per million mapped reads (RPM) > 200 (Table S1). From these candidates, we further narrow down the selection by selecting top ten circRNAs. Then we performed qRT-PCR to further quantify this result in LC3-dotsMore (n = 23) and LC3-dotsLess BC tissues (n = 22), and found that only three circRNA candidates - hsa_circ_0008285 (derived from CDYL gene, hereafter termed as circCDYL), hsa_circ_0024604 and hsa_circ_0007059 were consistent with the result of circRNAs deep sequencing (Fig. 1c, Fig. S1B). Next, we established two autophagy induction breast cancer cell models in vitro under hypoxia and EBSS starvation treatment (Fig. S2A-2C), and found that only circCDYL was up-regulated in both models (Fig. 1d, Fig. S2D-E). All these data above indicated that circCDYL is an autophagy associated circRNA, and the basic characteristic of circCDYL has been reported in published research [34].

High circCDYL is associated with poor prognosis and clinical response in BC patients

The expression of circCDYL and linear CDYL in 113 BC tissues and 47 corresponding paired non-cancerous tissues from Cohort 1 were detected by ISH. circCDYL and linear CDYL was elevated up to 3.2 and 1.5 folds respectively in BC tissues than adjacent non-cancerous tissues (Fig. 2a, Fig. S3A). The clinicopathological features were analyzed based on expression of circCDYL or linear CDYL in BC tissues (Table 1, Table S2). Higher circCDYL expression was significantly associated with ER negative status, higher Ki67 index, larger tumor size and more lymphatic metastasis. No correction was found between linear CDYL and these clinicopathological features. In addition, the Pearson correlation analysis showed that circCDYL and linear CDYL expression was positively correlated with the number of LC3 dots (circCDYL: r = 0.712, linear CDYL: r = 0.298) (Fig. 2b, Fig. S3B). The expression of circCDYL and linear CDYL was increased up to 2.2 and 1.2 folds in LC3-dotsMore tissues, when comparing with LC3-dotsLess tissues (Fig. 2c, Fig. S3C). A Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated that patients with high circCDYL had a poorer disease-free survival (DFS) (HR 2.85, 95% CI 1.415–5.739, P = 0.0036, Fig. 2d), but expression of linear CDYL had no effect on DFS of BC patients (Fig. S3D). These results suggested that circCDYL may play more important role in breast cancer than linear CDYL.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Clinical significance of circCDYL in breast cancer. a Comparison of circCDYL expression between breast cancer tissues and paired adjacent non-cancerous tissues by qRT-PCR (n = 47) and their representative images by ISH. Scale bar = 50 μm. b Correlations of circCDYL expression and the number of LC3 dots in breast cancer tumors, analyzed by Pearson analysis. c Representative images of LC3 dots and circCDYL expression by ISH in breast cancer tissues (left) and quantitative analysis of circCDYL expression in cancer tissues with more and less LC3 dots. Scale bar = 50 μm. d Kaplan-Meier analysis of the correlation between circCDYL expression and disease-free survival (DFS). e circCDYL abundance in serum of patients detected by ddPCR (n = 62, Cohort 2). EBC: early breast cancer, MBC: metastatic breast cancer.f Representative images in cases with lung and liver metastasis before and after chemotherapy and real time kinetics of serum circCDYL during chemotherapy in MBC patients (n = 18, Cohort 2). PR: partial response; CR: complete response; PD: progressive disease; SD: stable disease. g Kaplan-Meier analysis of the correlation between serum circCDYL expression and overall survival (OS) in MBC patients (Cohort 3). *P <  0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.005. Error bars indicate Standard Error of Mean (S.E.M)

Full size image
Table 1 Patient characteristics stratified by circCDYL expression
Full size table

Next, BC patients’ serum from Cohort 2 and Cohort 3 were collected. Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) were performed to verify the abundance of circCDYL in serum of these patients. Clinical data from Cohort 2 showed that circCDYL was the most abundant in the serum from metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients, compared to early breast cancer (EBC) and benign patients (Fig. 2e). We further detected the real time kinetics of serum circCDYL in MBC patients (n = 18) during chemotherapy and found that reduction of circCDYL is positively correlated to a better sensitivity to clinical therapy (Fig. 2f). In addition, survival analysis from Cohort 3 containing 30 MBC patients showed that patients with high serum circCDYL had a poorer overall survival (HR 3.748, 95% CI 1.233–11.239, P = 0.002, Fig. 2g). These clinical data suggested that circCDYL may be a potential molecule for predicting the prognosis and therapy response of BC patients.

circCDYL regulates the proliferation of BC cells via autophagy

To investigate the biological function of circCDYL, the expression of circCDYL was downregulated by RNAi-mediated gene silencing using siRNA (Fig. S4A) and lenti-shRNA (Fig. S4B). Overexpression of circCDYL was carried out through transfection of circCDYL over-expressing plasmids (Fig. S4C) or circCDYL over-expressing lentivirus (Fig. S4D) without influencing the expression of linear CDYL RNA. Next, we found that inhibition of autophagy by bafilomycin A1 (Baf A1, an autophagy inhibitor) had no influence on the expression level of circCDYL in MDA-MB-231 cells (Fig. 3a, Fig. S4E). However, silencing or over-expression of circCDYL resulted in down- or up- regulation of the basal autophagic level of MDA-MB-231 cells as determined by LC3-II protein level (Fig. 3b). To visualize autophagosomes, we then established a stable MDA-MB-231 cell line with LC3 labeled by mCherry and GFP. LC3 dots were increased after circCDYL overexpression in LC3-mCherry-GFP-labeled MDA-MB-231 cells, and decreased after circCDYL silencing (Fig. 3c, Fig. S4F). All these indicate that circCDYL affects autophagic level in BC cells, but autophagy did not affect the expression of circCDYL.

Fig. 3
figure 3

circCDYL promotes proliferation of breast cancer cells via autophagy. a qRT-PCR analysis of circCDYL in MDA-MB-231 cells after Baf A1 (Bafilomycin A1) treatment. b LC3 expression in MDA-MB-231 after circCDYL silencing via siRNA or over-expressing circCDYL by over-expressing plasmid, as detected by Western Blot. LC3-II/I, the gray value ratio of LC3-II and LC3-I, normalized to NC group. c Autophagosomes in mCherry-GFP-LC3 labeled MDA-MB-231 after silencing circCDYL via siRNA or over-expressing circCDYL by over-expressing plasmid, as detected by confocal microscopy. Scale bar = 50 μm. d, e The proliferation of MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 cells after silencing circCDYL viasiRNA or over-expressing circCDYL via over-expressing plasmid, as detected by cell viability assay (d) and plate colony formation (e). f, g Proliferation of MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7, as detected by plate colony formation (f) and cell viability assay (g) after transfection with circCDYL over-expressing plasmid or co-treatment with Baf A1. siNC: negative control siRNA. All experiments above were repeated at least 5 times. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.005. Error bars indicate S.E.M

Full size image

Next, we investigated the biological function of circCDYL in BC cells. Cell viability assays indicated that the proportion of living cells were increased after circCDYL overexpression, and significantly decreased after siRNA silencing of circCDYL in both MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 (Fig. 3d). Similarly, plate colony formation assay showed that colony formation increased after circCDYL overexpression and decreased after circCDYL silencing (Fig. 3e, Fig. S4G). However, circCDYL expression level had no significant effect on the invasion and apoptosis in MDA-MB-231 cells (Fig. S4H-I). Both plate colony formation assay and cell viability assay showed that inhibition of autophagic flux by Bafilomycin A1 attenuated the effect of circCDYL overexpression on proliferation in MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 cell lines (Fig. 3f-g, Fig. S4J).

In addition, we designed three siRNAs: (i) target against circCDYL only (si-circ), (ii) target against linear CDYL only (si-linear), and (iii) target against both circCDYL and linear CDYL (si-cl) (Fig. S5A). Both si-circ and si-cl transfection had similar effect on the decreased proliferation of MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 cells, while si-linear transfection had no significant effect on cell proliferation (Fig. S5B). In addition, both si-circular and si-cl transfection increase autophagic level by detecting protein level of LC3-II, while si-linear showed little effect on autophagy regulation (Fig. S5C). The result above indicates that circCDYL but not linear CDYL has the biological function on proliferation and autophagy regulation.

circCDYL works as miR-1275 sponge in breast cancer cells

It has been demonstrated that circRNAs have a potential to work as a miRNA sponge if the circRNAs can form a circRNA-AGO2-miRNA complex by binding to AGO2 and miRNAs [22, 23, 38]. AGO2 RIP assay confirmed that AGO2 could bind circCDYL (power value =10.7*10− 9, Fig. 4a), suggesting that circCDYL may work as a miRNA sponge. We successfully established circRNAs pull-down assay using biotinylated probes specifically against circCDYL (Fig. S6A). We purified the circCDYL-binding RNAs by circRNAs pull-down and scanned the candidate miRNAs by miRNAs microarray (Fig. 4b, Table S3). We selected the miRNA candidates that met the following criteria: (i) fold change > 3 compared to NC; and (ii) normalized intensity of miRNA candidates > 100. miR-1275 was the only specific sponging miRNA for circCDYL (Fig. 4b). We then verified the results of miRNA microarray by qRT-PCR and found that miR-1275 was enriched by circCDYL probe (Fig. 4c). Similarly, miRNA pull-down assay showed that biotinylated miR-1275 also enriched circCDYL (Fig. 4d). In addition, we tested the basic expression of miR-1275 as well as other miRNAs that were known to be highly upregulated in breast cancer (including miR-7, miR-30c, miR-135b, miR-16, miR-206, miR-200a) [39, 40]. Expression of miR-1275 was similar to miR-30c, miR-135b and miR-7, and significantly higher than miR-200a and miR-206 in MDA-MB-231 cells (Fig. S6B). Further analysis from online website RNAhybrid 2.0 (https://bibiserv.cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de/rnahybrid/) showed that circCDYL had 3 binding sites of miR-1275 (Fig. S6C). To further confirm this result, we performed a dual luciferase reporter assay by co-transfecting miR-1275 mimic and the luciferase reporters into HEK-293 T cells. In the non-mutant groups, miR-1275 mimic reduced the luciferase reporter activity by 65%, and this result can be reversed after mutating either binding site 2 or 3 of circCDYL sequence in luciferase reporters, indicating that circCDYL bound to miR-1275 specifically at these two binding sites (Fig. 4e). In addition, the expression of miR-1275 remained unchanged after silencing of circCDYL in both MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells, suggesting that circCDYL interacted with miR-1275 without affecting the expression of miR-1275 (Fig. S6D). In LC3-mCherry-GFP-labeled MDA-MB-231 cell, LC3 dots were increased after miR-1275 inhibitor transfection and significantly decreased after miR-1275 mimic transfection, suggesting miR-1275 promoted autophagic level (Fig. 4f, Fig. S6E). In MDA-MB-231 cells, LC3-II was up-regulated after miR-1275 inhibitor transfection and down-regulated after miR-1275 mimic transfection (Fig. 4g). Cell viability assays indicated that the proliferative speed was faster after miR-1275 inhibitor transfection and was slower after miR-1275 mimic treatment in both MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 (Fig. S6F).

Fig. 4
figure 4

circCDYL functions as miR-1275 sponge. a qRT-PCR analysis of circCDYL in RNA sample after RIP assay by AGO2 antibody. b Heatmap of miRNA microarray of RNA sample by circCDYL pull-down. c qRT-PCR analysis of miR-1275 in RNA sample by circCDYL pull-down. d qRT-PCR analysis of circCDYL in RNA sample by miR-1275 miRNA pull-down. e Dual luciferase assay of HEK-293 T cells co-transfected with miR-1275 mimic and luciferase reporter containing full length of circCDYL with or without miR-1275 binding site mutant. NC: negative control; WT: wild-type luciferase reporter containing full length of circCDYL. f LC3 dots in mCherry-GFP-LC3-labeled MDA-MB-231 cells. g LC3-II expression in MDA-MB-231 after treatments with miR-1275 mimic or inhibitor, as detected by Western Blot. h Western Blot analysis of LC3-II expression in MDA-231 co-transfected with circCDYL over-expressing plasmid and miR-1275 mimic or co-transfected with circCDYL specific siRNA and miR-1275 inhibitor. i-j. Proliferation level of MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 detected by cell viability assay (i) and plate colony formation (j) after co-transfection with circCDYL over-expressing plasmid and miR-1275 mimic or co-transfection with circCDYL specific siRNA and miR-1275 inhibitor. All data are shown as the mean ± S.E.M. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.005

Full size image

circCDYL promotes autophagic flux via miR-1275 and is responsible for the proliferation of BC cells

We then tested whether circCDYL regulated autophagic level and proliferation via miR-1275 sponging mechanism. In MDA-MB-231 cells, Western Blot indicated that co-transfection with miR-1275 mimic and circCDYL over-expressing plasmid could restore the effect of LC3-II up-regulation by circCDYL overexpression, in contrast, co-transfection with miR-1275 inhibitor and circCDYL siRNA could restore the effect of LC3-II down-regulation via circCDYL silencing (Fig. 4h). In addition, in mCherry-GFP-LC3-labeled MDA-MB-231, we observed that co-transfection of miR-1275 mimic and circCDYL over-expressing plasmid partially restored the effect of circCDYL overexpression on the increased autophagic level, while co-transfection of miR-1275 inhibitor and circCDYL siRNA partially rescued this effect of circCDYL silencing (Fig. S6G). In addition, plate colony formation assay and cell viability assay showed that transfection of miR-1275 mimic also partially restored the proliferation-promoting effect after circCDYL overexpression in both MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells, while addition of miR-1275 inhibitor partially rescued the effect of knocking down circCDYL (Fig. 4i-j).

circCDYL regulates ATG7 and ULK1 expression via miR-1275 sponge

Three online websites, TargetScanHuman, miRNA.org and miRNAWalk, were used to predict the potential target genes of miR-1275. As shown in Fig. S7A, total seven autophagy-associated genes, including ULK1, ATG3, ATG4C, ATG4D, ATG7, ATG10, ATG14, were shown as the target genes of miR-1275 in at least two online websites. We further confirmed that miR-1275 mimic decreased ULK1 and ATG7 expression at RNA level by 55 and 63% respectively, while miR-1275 inhibitor increased ULK1 and ATG7 expression by 83 and 180% in MDA-MB-231 (Fig. 5a). However, ectopic expression of miR-1275 has no influence on the expression of ATG3, ATG4C, ATG4D, ATG10 and ATG14 (Fig. S7B). Western Blot analysis indicated that miR-1275 mimic decreased the protein level of ULK1 and ATG7, while miR-1275 inhibitor increased these proteins in MDA-MB-231 (Fig. 5b). Furthermore, miR-1275 pull-down assay showed that biotinylated miR-1275 mimic enriched ATG7 and ULK1 mRNA, suggesting that ATG7 and ULK1 are the target genes of miR-1275 (Fig. S7C). Moreover, we found that overexpressing circCDYL-wt significantly increased ATG7 and ULK1 expression, while the circCDYL-mu overexpressing had no effect on ATG7 and ULK1 regulation (Fig. S7D). Transfection of miR-1275 inhibitor could restore ATG7 and ULK1 expression after circCDYL knockdown, and transfection of miR-1275 mimic could restore ATG7 and ULK1 expression after circCDYL overexpression at both RNA and protein level (Fig. 5c, d). The results above indicate that circCDYL regulates the expression of ATG7 and ULK1 via miR-1275 sponge.

Fig. 5
figure 5

circCDYL promotes proliferation of breast cancer cells via miR-1275-ATG7/ ULK1-autophagic axis. a ATG7 and ULK1 expression of MDA-MB-231 after transfection with miR-1275 mimic or inhibitor, as detected by qRT-PCR. b ATG7 and ULK1 expression of MDA-MB-231 after transfection with miR-1275 mimic or inhibitor, as detected by Western Blot. c, d ATG7 and ULK1 expression in MDA-MB-231 after transfection with circCDYL over-expressing plasmid and ATG7 or ULK1 siRNA, as detected by qRT-PCR (C) and Western Blot (D). e Western Blot analysis of LC3-II expression in MDA-MB-231 after co-transfection with circCDYL over-expressing plasmids and ATG7 or ULK1 siRNA. f Proliferation level of MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 after co-transfection with circCDYL over-expressing plasmids and ATG7 or ULK1 siRNA, as detected by plate colony formation

Full size image

Next, we elucidated whether circCDYL regulates autophagy and proliferation of breast cancer cells via miR-1275-ATG7/ULK1 axis. By using siRNA, we successfully silenced ATG7 or ULK1 in both MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells (Fig. S7E). Importantly, silencing of ATG7 or ULK1 restored the effect of circCDYL overexpression on increasing the autophagic marker LC3-II, as detected by Western Blot (Fig. 5e). In addition, silencing ATG7 restored the inhibitory effect of circCDYL overexpression on increasing autophagosomes in mCherry-GFP-labeled MDA-MB-231 cells, as determined by LC3 dots (Fig. S7F). In functional experiments, plate colony formation assay showed that the proliferation-promoting effect of circCDYL overexpression was attenuated after co-transfection of circCDYL overexpression plasmid with ATG7 or ULK1 siRNA (Fig. 5f).

In addition, we tested the Ki67, ATG7 and ULK1 by IHC, LC3 dots by IF and circCDYL expression by ISH in tumor tissues of Cohort 1 (Fig. S8A). The tumor tissues with higher CDYL expression exhibited a higher Ki67 index (Fig. S8B). Linear regression analysis showed the circCDYL expression was positively associated with ATG7 and ULK1 expression (Fig. S8C). Low ATG7 or ULK1 was associated with longer DFS among these patients (ULK1: HR 2.745, 95% CI 1.393-4.410, P = 0.0037; ATG7: HR 1.98, 95% CI 1.012–3.909, P = 0.0462, Fig. S8D).

Linear CDYL has weak potential to act as miR-1275 sponge

We then examined whether circCDYL possesses more miR-1275 sponging power compared to linear CDYL via a series of experiments. Firstly, AGO2 RIP assays were employed and showed that AGO2 antibody enriched much more circCDYL than linear CDYL (circCDYL: power value =10.7*10− 9; linear CDYL: power value =2.2*10− 9) (Fig. 4a, Fig. S9A). Secondly, two luciferase reporter plasmids with total length of linear CDYL or circCDYL were conducted. Luciferase reporter assays showed that overexpression of miR-1275 mimic dramatically reduced the circCDYL luciferase reporter activity up to 65% but only reduced linear CDYL luciferase reporter activity by 25% (Fig. 4e and Fig. S9B). Furthermore, circCDYL pull-down and linear CDYL pull-down assay revealed that, compared with linear CDYL probes, circCDYL probe enriched much more miR-1275 (circCDYL probes: power value =5.9*10− 10; linear CDYL probes: power value =1.4*10− 11) (Fig. 4c and Fig. S9C). Moreover, the inhibitory effect of miR-1275 mimic on ATG7 and ULK1 expression could be only rescued by overexpressing circCDYL but not by linear CDYL overexpression in the MDA-MB-231 cells (Fig. S9D). Therefore, the results above provides further evidence that circCDYL possesses more miR-1275 sponging power compared to linear CDYL.

circCDYL promotes proliferation via autophagy in breast cancer orthotopic animal model

To further confirm that circCDYL could promote BC cells proliferation in vivo, we established breast cancer orthotopic model in Balb/c nude mice. The tumors derived from MDA-MB-231 cells with stable knockdown of circCDYL (sh-circCDYL) had significantly slower growth than the control group (sh-NC) (Fig. 6a). The average tumor size of sh-circCDYL group was much smaller than sh-NC group as indicated by live imaging (Fig. 6b) or by measuring tumor sizes after tumor excision (Fig. 6c). sh-circCDYL group had a lighter weight than sh-NC group (Fig. 6d). In addition, the resected tumors were made into paraffin-embedded sections, followed by detection of ATG7, ULK1, LC3 dots and Ki67. sh-circCDYL group had lower expression of ATG7, ULK1, less LC3 dots and lower Ki67 index than sh-NC group (Fig. 6e). The results demonstrate that circCDYL plays an important role in promoting breast cancer progression in vivo via autophagy.

Fig. 6
figure 6

circCDYL promotes progression of breast cancer in vivo. a Tumor size derived from MDA-MB-231 cell line was measured in Balb/c nude mice with orthotopic tumors in the fourth left mammary fat pad. b Live imaging of the animals prior to euthanasia, and photon intensities are indicated above the picture. c, d Tumor size (C) and tumor weight (D) measured after tumor excision. e IHC staining of ATG7, ULK1 and Ki67, and IF detection of LC3 dots in orthotopic tumors derived from MDA-MB-231 cell line. Scale bar = 50 μm

Full size image

Discussion

Breast cancer is the most common malignancies among women [1, 41]. Though breast cancer exhibits good prognosis, some breast cancer patients still suffer tumor progression. One of the emerging concepts to promote progression of breast cancer is autophagy [4, 8,9,10,11]. It is now known that the dysregulation of autophagy promotes progression of breast cancer. However, the molecular mechanism of autophagy in the progression of breast cancer is still unknown. In this study, we identified and characterized an autophagy associated circRNA circCDYL by deep sequencing in BC tissues with different autophagic level. Clinically, data from three independent cohorts showed the strong clinical relevance between circCDYL expression and prognosis as well as clinical response to therapy in breast cancer patients. Mechanistically, circCDYL accelerates autophagic flux via sponging miR-1275 and affects its downstream targeted gene ATG7 and ULK1, thus promotes the proliferation of breast cancer (Fig. S10). It is well known that ULK1 is key molecule in ULK1 complex, which is essential in the initiation of autophagy [42]. ATG7 acts as an E1-like activating enzyme to transform LC3-I to LC3-II by conjugation of LC3-I with phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) during autophagosome formation, and LC3-II plays an essential role in autophagosome formation [43]. All these suggest that circular circCDYL promotes proliferation of breast cancer via escalation of autophagic flux and plays an important role in the progression of breast cancer.

circRNAs are generally considered to be molecular flukes or byproducts of transcription. However, increasing evidences indicate that circRNAs are abundant in cells and play an important role in regulating disease progression [30]. Tantamount studies indicate that circRNAs work as miRNA sponge by trapping and halting the function of target miRNAs [7, 20,21,22]. Various studies indicate that circRNAs with intronic sequence may regulate transcription of parent genes in the nucleus [24, 25] and circRNAs with internal ribosome entry site (IREs) and open reading frame (ORF) could potentially be translated into proteins [26,27,28]. circCDYL, a circular RNA derived from the fourth exon of CDYL gene, is mainly located in cytoplasm and had no intronic sequence, IREs and ORF (online website: http://reprod.njmu.edu.cn/circrnadb, data not shown), suggesting that circCDYL might not locate in nucleus or translate into proteins. Emerging evidences shows that certain circRNAs can form a circRNAs-miRNA-AGO2 complex if the circRNA can work as miRNA sponge [22, 23, 38]. According to our data, AGO2 RIP experiment shows that circCDYL indeed bind to AGO2, confirming circCDYL’s role as a miRNA sponge. We used circRNAs pulldown experiments and miRNA microarray to verify the miRNA candidate of circCDYL. miRNAs pulldown and circRNA pulldown as well as dual-luciferase reporter assay demonstrated that circCDYL functions as miR-1275 sponge and has two binding sites for miR-1275. In addition to the discovery of circCDYL, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first report in elucidating the role of miR-1275 in breast cancer, and we are the first to prove that miR-1275 inhibits proliferation of breast cancer cells.

It is interesting that only circCDYL has the biological function on proliferation and autophagy regulation, while the linear form of CDYL do not possess the same function., although they have the same miR-1275 biding sites. Several reasons may account for this: (i) Our research indicates that miR-1275 sponge potential of circCDYL is much stronger than linear CDYL. (ii) The major function of linear CDYL is to work as mRNA and translate into protein, and CDYL protein may play different role in biological function. The mechanism function of linear CDYL is much more complex than circCDYL, and further researches are required.

Identifying new molecular biomarkers for diagnosis and predicting prognosis and clinical efficacy of breast cancer patients is of high clinical significance. In this current study, we found that circCDYL expression in both breast cancer patients’ serum and tissue were much more abundant than those from the normal donors and adjacent normal tissues, suggesting that circCDYL could be utilized as a molecule for breast cancer diagnosis and therapy. Second, clinical data showed that increased circCDYL in breast cancer tissues was associated with more advance clinical stage, more metastasis and shorter survival, indicating that circCDYL could be a potential molecule for predicting breast cancer prognosis. Besides, the expression level of circCDYL in breast cancer tissues was positively associated with the level of LC3 dots, indicating that circCDYL could be a marker reflecting autophagic level of cancer.

Interestingly, we observed a real time kinetics of serum circCDYL in MBC patients and found that serum circCDYL level was decreased in patients who responded well to chemotherapy, indicating that serum circCDYL level might be a potential molecule to predict the clinical response to anti-cancer therapy. Several hypotheses are proposed to address this clinical relevance. (i) The abundance of circCDYL in cancer tissue were released into circulation as necrosis occurs due to ischemic and hypoxic tumor microenvironment, which could lead the induction of autophagy. We found that circCDYL expression was significantly increased in BC cells after hypoxia or starvation treatment, suggesting that more circCDYL were released into circulation when tumor cells are in hypoxic or ischemic condition. (ii) Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) bring circCDYL into the circulation, which could be a reservoir for circCDYL molecules. MBC patients are reported to have more CTCs [44] and our study found that MBC patients had more serum circCDYL than EBC patients, indirectly validating this hypothesis. (iii) Breast cancer cells release circCDYL through exosomes secretion. One research indicated that lung cancer cells can secret exosomal circCDYL and release into circulation [45], indicating that this pathway might be true for breast cancer as well. Furthermore, confirming the expression of circRNA biomarkers by minimally invasive liquid biopsies allows the clinician to monitor breast cancer progression and response to treatment in real-time setting, which would significantly improve the development of earlier intervention and to develop more precise therapy strategies that tailors to individual needs.

Conclusion

In summary, we identified an autophagy-associated circRNA (circCDYL) and demonstrated its strong correlations with autophagy in breast cancer, as well as its prognostic and predictive value in breast cancer patients. Mechanistically, we proved that circCDYL regulates proliferation of breast cancer cells via miR-1275-ATG7/ULK1-autophagic axis. circCDYL could be used as a novel circRNA biomarker for predicting the prognosis and clinical response to therapy as well as a potential therapeutic target, which provide real-time information for decisions making in personalized treatments.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets obtained and analyzed during the current study were made available from the corresponding authors through request.

Abbreviations

95% CI:

95% confidence interval

circCDYL:

Autophagy-associated circRNA

circRNA:

circular RNA

ddPCR:

droplet digital PCR

EBC:

Early breast cancer

ER:

Estrogen receptor

HR:

Hazard ratio

i.p :

intra-peritoneally injection

IF:

Immunofluorescence

IHC:

Immunohistochemical staining

MBC:

Metastatic breast cancer

NC:

Negative control

qRT-PCR:

Real-Time Quantitative Reverse Transcription PCR

SYSMH:

Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital

References

  1. Kalimutho M, Nones K, Srihari S, Duijf PHG, Waddell N, Khanna KK. Patterns of genomic instability in breast Cancer. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2019;40:198–211.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Eskelinen E. Autophagy: supporting cellular and organismal homeostasis by self-eating. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2019;111:1–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mizushima N. A brief history of autophagy from cell biology to physiology and disease. Nat Cell Biol. 2018;20:521–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Vera-Ramirez L, Vodnala SK, Nini R, Hunter KW, Green JE. Autophagy promotes the survival of dormant breast cancer cells and metastatic tumour recurrence. Nat Commun. 2018;9:1944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu H, Ma Y, He H, Wang J, Jiang J, Shao R. SLC9A3R1 stimulates autophagy via BECN1 stabilization in breast cancer cells. Autophagy. 2015;11:2323–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cicchini M, Chakrabarti R, Kongara S, Price S, Nahar R, Lozy F, Zhong H, Vazquez A, Kang Y, Karantza V. Autophagy regulator BECN1 suppresses mammary tumorigenesis driven by WNT1 activation and following parity. Autophagy. 2014;10:2036–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mathew R, Karantza-Wadsworth V, White E. Role of autophagy in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2007;7:961–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Chang C, Bijian K, Wernic D, Su J, Da Silva SD, Yu H, Qiu D, Asslan M, Alaoui-Jamali MA. A novel orally available seleno-purine molecule suppresses triple-negative breast cancer cell proliferation and progression to metastasis by inducing cytostatic autophagy. Autophagy. 2019;15:1376–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kaverina N, Borovjagin AV, Kadagidze Z, Baryshnikov A, Baryshnikova M, Malin D, Ghosh D, Shah N, Welch DR, Gabikian P, et al. Astrocytes promote progression of breast cancer metastases to the brain via a KISS1-mediated autophagy. Autophagy. 2017;13:1905–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Du WW, Yang W, Li X, Awan FM, Yang Z, Fang L, Lyu J, Li F, Peng C, Krylov SN, et al. A circular RNA circ-DNMT1 enhances breast cancer progression by activating autophagy. Oncogene. 2018;37:5829–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang H, Zhang N, Liu Y, Su P, Liang Y, Li Y, Wang X, Chen T, Song X, Sang Y, et al. Epigenetic regulation of NAMPT by NAMPT-AS drives metastatic progression in triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2019;79:3347–59.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee M, Koh D, Na H, Ka N, Kim S, Kim H, Hong S, Shin YK, Seong JK, Lee M. MTA1 is a novel regulator of autophagy that induces tamoxifen resistance in breast cancer cells. Autophagy. 2018;14:812–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Panda AC, Grammatikakis I, Munk R, Gorospe M, Abdelmohsen K. Emerging roles and context of circular RNAs. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA. 2017;8:e1386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jeck WR, Sorrentino JA, Wang K, Slevin MK, Burd CE, Liu J, Marzluff WF, Sharpless NE. Circular RNAs are abundant, conserved, and associated with ALU repeats. RNA (New York, NY). 2013;19:141–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Salzman J, Chen RE, Olsen MN, Wang PL, Brown PO. Cell-type specific features of circular RNA expression. PLoS Genet. 2013;9:e1003777.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Memczak S, Jens M, Elefsinioti A, Torti F, Krueger J, Rybak A, Maier L, Mackowiak SD, Gregersen LH, Munschauer M, et al. Circular RNAs are a large class of animal RNAs with regulatory potency. Nature. 2013;495:333–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Shen M, Li T, Zhang G, Wu P, Chen F, Lou Q, Chen L, Yin X, Zhang T, Wang J. Dynamic expression and functional analysis of circRNA in granulosa cells during follicular development in chicken. BMC Genomics. 2019;20:1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang H, Jiang L, Sun D, Hou J, Ji Z. CircRNA: a novel type of biomarker for cancer. Breast Cancer-Tokyo. 2018;25:1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Fu B, Zhang A, Li M, Pan L, Tang W, An M, Liu W, Zhang J. Circular RNA profile of breast cancer brain metastasis: identification of potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets. Epigenomics. 2018;10:1619–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hansen TB, Jensen TI, Clausen BH, Bramsen JB, Finsen B, Damgaard CK, Kjems J. Natural RNA circles function as efficient microRNA sponges. Nature. 2013;495:384–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Han D, Li J, Wang H, Su X, Hou J, Gu Y, Qian C, Lin Y, Liu X, Huang M, et al. Circular RNA circMTO1 acts as the sponge of microRNA-9 to suppress hepatocellular carcinoma progression. Hepatology. 2017;66:1151–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Rong D, Lu C, Zhang B, Fu K, Zhao S, Tang W, Cao H. CircPSMC3 suppresses the proliferation and metastasis of gastric cancer by acting as a competitive endogenous RNA through sponging miR-296-5p. Mol Cancer. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12943-019-0958-6.

  23. Zhou C, Liu H-s, Wang F-w, Hu T, Liang Z-x, Lan N, He X-w, Zheng X-b, Wu X-j, Xie D, Wu X-r, Lan P. circCAMSAP1 promotes tumor growth in colorectal cancer via the miR-328-5p/E2F1 axis. Mol Ther. 2019.

  24. Zhang Y, Zhang XO, Chen T, Xiang JF, Yin QF, Xing YH, Zhu S, Yang L, Chen LL. Circular intronic long noncoding RNAs. Mol Cell. 2013;51:792–806.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Li Z, Huang C, Bao C, Chen L, Lin M, Wang X, Zhong G, Yu B, Hu W, Dai L, et al. Exon-intron circular RNAs regulate transcription in the nucleus. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2015;22:256–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang M, Zhao K, Xu X, Yang Y, Yan S, Wei P, Liu H, Xu J, Xiao F, Zhou H, et al. A peptide encoded by circular form of LINC-PINT suppresses oncogenic transcriptional elongation in glioblastoma. Nat Commun. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06862-2.

  27. Legnini I, Di Timoteo G, Rossi F, Morlando M, Briganti F, Sthandier O, Fatica A, Santini T, Andronache A, Wade M, et al. Circ-ZNF609 is a circular RNA that can be translated and functions in Myogenesis. Mol Cell. 2017;66:22–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Yang Y, Gao X, Zhang M, Yan S, Sun C, Xiao F, Huang N, Yang X, Zhao K, Zhou H, et al. Novel role of FBXW7 circular RNA in repressing Glioma tumorigenesis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018;110:304–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Tang H, Huang X, Wang J, Yang L, Kong Y, Gao G, Zhang L, Chen Z, Xie X. circKIF4A acts as a prognostic factor and mediator to regulate the progression of triple-negative breast cancer. Mol Cancer. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12943-019-0946-x.

  30. Liu J, Li D, Luo H, Zhu X. Circular RNAs: the star molecules in cancer. Mol Asp Med. 2019;70:141–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Yang R, Xing L, Zheng X, Sun Y, Wang X, Chen J. The circRNA circAGFG1 acts as a sponge of miR-195-5p to promote triple-negative breast cancer progression through regulating CCNE1 expression. Mol Cancer. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12943-018-0933-7.

  32. Liu F, Zhang J, Qin L, Yang Z, Xiong J, Zhang Y, Li R, Li S, Wang H, Yu B, et al. Circular RNA EIF6 (Hsa_circ_0060060) sponges miR-144-3p to promote the cisplatin-resistance of human thyroid carcinoma cells by autophagy regulation. Aging (Albany NY). 2018;10:3806–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhou L, Zhai M, Huang Y, Xu S, An T, Wang Y, Zhang R, Liu C, Dong Y, Wang M, et al. The circular RNA ACR attenuates myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury by suppressing autophagy via modulation of the Pink1/ FAM65B pathway. Cell Death Differ. 2019;26:1299–315.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Wei Y, Chen X, Liang C, Ling Y, Yang X, Ye X, Zhang H, Yang P, Cui X, Ren Y, et al. A noncoding regulatory RNAs network driven by Circ-CDYL acts specifically in the early stages hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.30795.

  35. Sun J, Zhang H, Tao D, Xie F, Liu F, Gu C, Wang M, Wang L, Jiang G, Wang Z, Xiao X. CircCDYL inhibits the expression of C-MYC to suppress cell growth and migration in bladder cancer. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2019;47:1349–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Coscujuela Tarrero L, Ferrero G, Miano V, De Intinis C, Ricci L, Arigoni M, Riccardo F, Annaratone L, Castellano I, Calogero RA, et al. Luminal breast cancer-specific circular RNAs uncovered by a novel tool for data analysis. Oncotarget. 2018;9:14580–96.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Liu Z, Zhou Y, Liang G, Ling Y, Tan W, Tan L, Andrews R, Zhong W, Zhang X, Song E, Gong C. Circular RNA hsa_circ_001783 regulates breast cancer progression via sponging miR-200c-3p. Cell Death Dis. 2019;10:55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Yu C, Li T, Wu Y, Yeh C, Chiang W, Chuang C, Kuo H. The circular RNA circBIRC6 participates in the molecular circuitry controlling human pluripotency. Nat Commun. 2017;8.

  39. Di Leva G, Gasparini P, Piovan C, Ngankeu A, Garofalo M, Taccioli C, Iorio MV, Li M, Volinia S, Alder H, et al. MicroRNA cluster 221-222 and estrogen receptor α interactions in breast Cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102:706–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Gong C, Tan W, Chen K, You N, Zhu S, Liang G, Xie X, Li Q, Zeng Y, Ouyang N, et al. Prognostic value of a BCSC-associated MicroRNA signature in hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative breast Cancer. Ebiomedicine. 2016;11:199–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Maajani K, Jalali A, Alipour S, Khodadost M, Tohidinik HR, Yazdani K. The global and regional survival rate of women with breast Cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Breast Cancer. 2019;19:165–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Zachari M, Ganley IG. The mammalian ULK1 complex and autophagy initiation. Essays Biochem. 2017;61:585–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Nitta A, Hori K, Tanida I, Igarashi A, Deyama Y, Ueno T, Kominami E, Sugai M, Aoki K. Blocking LC3 lipidation and ATG12 conjugation reactions by ATG7 mutant protein containing C572S. Biochem Bioph Res Co. 2019;508:521–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Jiang ZF, Cristofanilli M, Shao ZM, Tong ZS, Song EW, Wang XJ, Liao N, Hu XC, Liu Y, Wang Y, et al. Circulating tumor cells predict progression-free and overall survival in Chinese patients with metastatic breast cancer, HER2-positive or triple-negative (CBCSG004): a multicenter, double-blind, prospective trial. Ann Oncol. 2013;24:2766–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Li L, Li W, Chen N, Zhao H, Xu G, Zhao Y, Pan X, Zhang X, Zhou L, Yu D, et al. FLI1 Exonic circular RNAs as a novel oncogenic driver to promote tumor metastasis in small cell lung Cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2019;25:1302–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank for the Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery at the Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital (Guangzhou, China) to provide HEK-293 T cell line. We are appreciated that the grant of Jeunes Talents France-Chine supported the academic exchanges in Institut Necker-Enfants Malades (INEM) and Université Paris Descartes-Sorbonne Paris Cité. We are appreciated that our research was partly supported by Fountain-Valley  Life Science Fund of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences Education Foundation.

Funding

This work is supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFC1309103 and 2017YFC1309104); the Natural Science Foundation of China (81621004, 81672594, 81772836 and 81872139, 81830082); Jeunes Talents France-Chine (JTFC2019); Clinical Innovation Project of Guangzhou Regenerative Medicine and Health Guangdong Laboratory (2018GZ0201004); Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital Cultivation Project for Clinical Research (SYS-C-201805).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Gehao Liang and Yun Ling contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Breast Tumor Center, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, 107 Yanjiang West Road, Guangzhou, 510120, China

    Gehao Liang, Yun Ling, Zihao Liu, Zhenluan Tian, Wenjing Zhong, Wanyi Lin, Qing Luo, Qun Lin, Qiufang Li, Erwei Song & Chang Gong

  2. Institut Necker-Enfants Malades (INEM), Inserm U1151-CNRS UMR 8253, 75993, Paris, France

    Maryam Mehrpour, Ahmed Hamai & Patrice Codogno

  3. Université Paris Descartes-Sorbonne Paris Cité, 75993, Paris, France

    Maryam Mehrpour, Ahmed Hamai & Patrice Codogno

  4. Medical Research Center, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510120, China

    Phei Er Saw

  5. Department of Breast Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510120, China

    Weige Tan

  6. Systems Immunity University Research Institute and Division of Infection and Immunity, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, UK

    You Zhou

  7. Minerva Foundation Institute for Medical Research, 00290, Helsinki, Finland

    You Zhou

  8. Department of Biochemistry, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China

    Jun Li

  9. Program of Molecular Medicine, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China

    Erwei Song

  10. Guangzhou Regenerative Medicine and Health Guangdong Laboratory, Guangzhou, 510005, China

    Erwei Song & Chang Gong

Authors
  1. Gehao Liang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yun Ling
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Maryam Mehrpour
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Phei Er Saw
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Zihao Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Weige Tan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Zhenluan Tian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Wenjing Zhong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Wanyi Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Qing Luo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Qun Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Qiufang Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. You Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Ahmed Hamai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Patrice Codogno
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Jun Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Erwei Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Chang Gong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Chang Gong, Gehao Liang and Yun Ling contributed to study concept and design, acquisition, analysis, interpretation of data and drafting of the manuscript. Yun Ling and Phei Er Saw contributed to data collections and manuscript review. Maryam Mehrpour, Zihao Liu, Weige Tan, Zhenluan Tian, Wenjing Zhong, Wanyi Lin, Qing Luo, Qun Lin, Qiufang Li, You Zhou, Ahmed Hamai, Patrice Codogno, Jun Li and Erwei Song contributed to drafting of the manuscript. Chang Gong supervised the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chang Gong.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

This work was approved by Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital Ethics Committee (SYSY-KY-KS-2018-05). The animal experiments were approved by Forevergen Medical Corporation (Guangzhou, China), and all experimental procedures on animals were in accordance with the ethical guidelines of the institution.

Consent for publication

Consent to publish has been obtained from all authors.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1.

Supplementary Materials and Method. Figure S1. LC3 expression was associated with poor survival of breast cancer. Figure S2. Autophagy induction model in vitro. Figure S3. Clinical significance of linear CDYL in BC. Figure S4. The functional role of circCDYL in BC cell lines. Figure S5. The functional role of linear CDYL in BC cell lines. Figure S6. circCDYL works as a sponge for miR-1275. Figure S7. miR-1275 targets 3’ UTR of ATG7 mRNA. Figure S8. ATG7 and ULK1 protein expression in the SYSMH Cohort 1 with 113 breast cancer patients. Figure S9. The miR-1275 binding power of linear CDYL. Figure S10. Graphic abstract. Table S1. circRNAs deep sequencing in breast cancer tissue with different autophagic level. Table S2. Patient characteristics stratified by expression of linear CDYL. Table S3. miRNAs microarray after circRNA pull down. Table S4. Sequence of siRNA or shRNA used in current study. Table S5. Primers used in current study. Table S6. Probes used in current study.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liang, G., Ling, Y., Mehrpour, M. et al. Autophagy-associated circRNA circCDYL augments autophagy and promotes breast cancer progression. Mol Cancer 19, 65 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12943-020-01152-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12943-020-01152-2

Keywords

Molecular Cancer

ISSN: 1476-4598