Open Access

Sensitive detection of human papillomavirus type 16 E7-specific T cells by ELISPOT after multiple in vitro stimulations of CD8+ T cells with peptide-pulsed autologous dendritic cells

  • Nathalie Cools1Email author,
  • Peter Ponsaerts1,
  • Marc Lenjou1,
  • Griet Nijs1,
  • Dirk R Van Bockstaele1,
  • Viggo FI Van Tendeloo1 and
  • Zwi N Berneman1
Molecular Cancer20065:49

https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-4598-5-49

Received: 01 November 2004

Accepted: 26 October 2006

Published: 26 October 2006

Abstract

Background

Cervical cancer is the second most common gynecological cancer amongst women world-wide. Despite optimized protocols, standard treatments still face several disadvantages. Therefore, research aims at the development of immune-based strategies using tumor antigen-loaded dendritic cells for the induction of cellular anti-tumor immunity.

Results

In this study, we used dendritic cells loaded with the HLA-A2-restricted HPV type 16 E711–20 peptide in order to induce an in vitro CD8+ T cell response. For this purpose, peptide-pulsed dendritic cells were co-cultured with autologous CD8+ T cells. After 5 weekly stimulations with peptide-pulsed mature dendritic cells, cultured T cells were analyzed for antigen specificity by an IFN-γ ELISPOT assay. Using this ELISPOT assay, we were able to detect E7-specific IFN-γ-secreting CD8+ T cells in 5/5 healthy donors.

Conclusion

We show that peptide-pulsed mature dendritic cells are able to stimulate a HPV type 16 E7 peptide-specific immune response in vitro. These experiments describe an efficient culture protocol for antigen-specific T cells for use in pre-clinical vaccination research and confirm the need for sensitive T cell assays for detection of tumor-specific immune responses in vitro.

Background

Cervical cancer contributes to approximately 12% of the global cancer burden in women and represents the second most frequent gynecological malignancy in the world [1, 2]. At an early stage, cervical cancer is treated by means of surgery and radiotherapy [3]. In a more advanced stage, one uses a combination therapy of cisplatinum-containing chemotherapy and radiotherapy [4]. Despite technological progress in conventional treatment modalities, more than 35% of patients develop a metastasizing malignancy with poor results after treatment. An additional disadvantage of radio- and chemotherapy is a pronounced and long-lasting negative effect on the immune system. For these reasons, current research aims at the development of new and more efficient strategies. In this context, dendritic cells (DC) loaded with tumor antigens for activation and/or expansion of tumor-specific T cells are currently the subject of intensive research in the field of cellular immunotherapy [57].

One of the major risk factors for the development of cervical cancer is infection with human papillomavirus (HPV). More than 20 oncogenic HPV genotypes have been characterized, while HPV type 16 (HPV-16) and type 18 (HPV-18) are the most prevalent in cervical cancer [8]. In HPV-16 positive tumors, the E7 oncoprotein is constitutively expressed in cervical tumor cells [9] and is responsible for transformation of these cells [10]. Moreover, HPV-16 E7-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) have been demonstrated in the peripheral blood, the lymph nodes and the tumor tissue of HPV-16-positive cervical carcinoma patients [11, 12]. An effective HPV-specific cellular immune response can be generated after active immunization [1316]. For these reasons, the HPV-16 E7 protein is a target of choice for the development of a specific immune therapy directed against cervical cancer.

Stimulation of the immune system against specific tumor antigens might become a suitable secondary (or even primary) therapy to treat cancer. Because tumor cells do not efficiently function as antigen-presenting cells (APC) for the activation of CTL, a vigorous immune response is generally absent or defective. To overcome this problem, transfer of tumor antigens from tumor cells to professional APC, like DC, might be a valuable strategy [17].

DC are the most efficient antigen-capturing and -presenting cells of the immune system and are potent inducers of (primary) immune responses directed against tumors and viral antigens [18]. In their immature state, DC are skilled in antigen uptake by means of endocytosis and phagocytosis. After uptake, antigens are processed by DC to peptide fragments which are bound to major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I and II molecules. After transport to the plasma membrane, these peptide-MHC complexes can be recognized by a T cell receptor (TCR) with high specificity for the antigenic peptide-MHC complex. If antigen uptake and presentation is associated with danger signals, provided by microbial components such as lipopolysaccharide (LPS) [19], DC are activated and an effective immune response can be induced.

In this study, we used in vitro cultured mature DC loaded with an HLA-A*0201-restricted HPV-16 E7 peptide for the in vitro activation of antigen-specific IFN-γ-producing CD8+ T cells. After several rounds of in vitro stimulation of CD8+ T cells using peptide-pulsed mature DC, the presence of HPV-16 E7 peptide-specific T cells was monitored using an IFN-γ enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) assay.

Results

Phenotypic analysis of mature monocyte-derived DC for T cell stimulation

Mature DC were differentiated starting from adherent monocytes as described in the Methods section [20]. Cultured DC were phenotypically characterized for the expression of typical DC membrane markers (HLA-DR, CD80, CD83 and CD86) by flow cytometry (Figure 1). Analysis was restricted to DC by gating based on characteristic forward and side scatter clustering (Figure 1: R1 gate in forward vs side scatter dot plot). The mature DC population was negative for the monocyte marker CD14 and positive for costimulatory molecules HLA-DR, CD80 and CD86 and the adhesion receptor CD83. Moreover, the final DC populations displayed minimal contamination of T and B cells as analyzed by CD3 and CD19 expression on the cultured DC population (Figure 1: no gate).
Figure 1

Immunophenotypic analysis of dendritic cells. Plastic adherent monocytes were cultured in the presence of GM-CSF and IL-4 for 6 days, followed by activation with a cytokine cocktail consisting of IL-1, IL-6, TNF-α and PGE2 for 24 hours (filled histogram). Analysis of typical DC membrane markers (CD80, 83, 86 and HLA-DR) and the monocyte marker CD14 was determined on R1 as shown in the forward vs side scatter dot plot, CD3 and CD19 on the ungated population. An isotype control is represented by the bold line.

Peptide-pulsed DC efficiently present a MHC class I-restricted E7 peptide to CD8+ T cells

First, we evaluated if our cultured mature DC population was able to present the YMLDLQPETT peptide to CD8+ T cells in a MHC class I-dependent way. For this, E7 peptide-pulsed mature DC (2.104 cells) as well as non-pulsed mature DC (2.104 cells) were co-cultured with an HLA-A*0201+ HPV-16 E7 YMLDLQPETT peptide-specific T cell clone (2.105 cells) for 6 hours in 96-round bottom wells. As showed by the production of IFN-γ by the T cell clone, E7-peptide-pulsed mature DC were able to stimulate these antigen-specific T cells (Figure 2, p = 0.001).
Figure 2

IFN-γ production by an HPV type 16 E7 peptide-specific HLA-A2 + T cell clone shows that peptide-pulsed mature DC efficiently bind and present the E7 peptide to T cells. HPV-16 E7-peptide-pulsed or non-pulsed mature DC were used as stimulator cells. Mature DC were co-incubated with a HPV-16 E7-specific CD8+ CTL clone. After 6 h, IFN-γ released in the co-culture was determined by IFN-γ ELISA. The T cell clone produced 2364 ± 28 pg/mL IFN-γ upon E7 peptide-pulsed mature DC stimulation compared to 83 ± 21 pg/mL IFN-γ upon control stimulation (p-value = 0.001).

Detection of immune responses against HPV-16 immunodominant E7 peptide

Previously, we reported a DC-based T cell activation protocol for influenza matrix protein M1 peptide-specific T cells [21]. We wanted to evaluate whether this T cell activation protocol was equally efficient in stimulating HPV-16 E7-specific autologous CD8+ T cells. However, after a 7 day in vitro stimulation period of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) with HPV-16 E7 peptide-pulsed mature DC, we were not able to detect an HPV-16 E7-specific immune response (data not shown). We therefore added to the protocol 4 additional weekly stimulations with HPV-16 E7-peptide-pulsed mature DC and implemented an IFN-γ ELISPOT technique for detection of antigen-specific IFN-γ-secreting T cells.

DC were differentiated starting from monocytes and matured with a maturation cocktail consisting of IL-1, IL-6, TNF-α and PGE2[22]. Co-cultures were set up in multiple 96-round-bottomed wells. In each well, 15.103 HPV-16 E7-peptide-pulsed DC were cocultured together with 15.104 autologous CD8+ T cells, isolated using magnetic bead selection from cryopreserved autologous PBMC (Figure 3). Growth factors (IL-2 and IL-7) were added weekly to the T cell medium starting from week 2, together with a total of 4 additional weekly stimulations with cryopreserved HPV-16 E7 peptide-pulsed DC. We evaluated the presence of a detectable immune response by determining the presence of IFN-γ-producing cells after restimulation with control or E7 peptide-pulsed targets by means of an IFN-γ ELISPOT. For this analysis we used non-pulsed K562-A*0201 cells as control targets and K562-A*0201 cells [23] pulsed with the HPV-16 E7 peptide as HPV-16 E7 peptide-specific target cells in a 10:1 effector:target cell ratio. Furthermore, the effector T cell population was phenotypically evaluated in order to address the nature of the effector T cell population with certainty. Figure 3 shows that the majority of effector cells exists of CD8β+ T cells. CD8β is a specific marker for cytotoxic T cells as it is not expressed by CD8α+ NK cells or CD4+ T helper cells.
Figure 3

Representative example of the phenotypic analysis of the effector T cell population. CD8+ T cells were isolated by magnetic separation using CD8 microbeads. Dot plots were gated on the lymphocyte population based on forward and side scatter properties. The indicated percentages are within the lymphocyte population.

Using the IFN-γ ELISPOT assay in several individual experiments (n = 48) tested per blood donor, a significant difference was detected between the number of spot-forming CD8+ T cells (SFC: spot-forming cells) in response to HPV-16 E7-peptide-pulsed target cells as compared to control targets (Table 1). Figure 4 shows a representative picture of a positive well per blood donor as compared to a control well on the ELISPOT plate. These results confirm that HPV-16 E7-specific T cells can be sufficiently activated and expanded by multiple stimulations with peptide-pulsed mature DC to a detectable level for analysis with an IFN-γ ELISPOT assay.
Table 1

Analysis of HPV-16 E7 antigen-specific IFN-γ secretion by means of the IFN-γ ELISPOT assay

DONOR

Fifth stimulation Positive cultures/total cultures

Percentage of antigen-specific spot forming cells (SFC) in positive wells

1

2/48

0.03–0.08 [0.06]

2

3/48

0.05–0.06 [0.05]

3

6/48

0.02–0.04 [0.03]

4

7/48

0.03–0.18 [0.08]

5

2/2

0.12–0.14 [0.13]

Responses were considered positive if a minimum of 15 SFC were counted after the control had been subtracted and if the ratio of SFC in positive wells to that in control wells was > 3. The range of the percentage of antigen-specific SCF is also given, with the mean percentage between square brackets, calculated as the ratio between the number of spots in a positive well and the total number of T cells in that well.

Figure 4

Representative presentation for each donor of a positive well (B) compared to a control well (A) in the IFN-γ ELISPOT plate. CD8+ T cells stimulated multiple times with HPV-16 E7 peptide-pulsed mature DC were analyzed for antigen-specific IFN-γ secretion by means of IFN-γ ELISPOT. For this analysis cultured CD8+ T cells were stimulated with HPV-16 E7 peptide-pulsed K562-HLA-A*0201 cells (B), while non-pulsed K562-A*0201 cells were used as control cells (A).

Discussion

Adequate immune monitoring techniques are of utmost importance to validate phase I/II clinical trials designed to test T cell-based vaccines for HPV-related malignancies. Such endpoints include the measurement of HPV-specific CTL- and T helper-mediated immune responses. Routinely used techniques such as ELISA and RT-PCR, do not provide information regarding the frequencies of cytokine-producing cells, in contrast to sensitive methods such as ELISPOT.

In this study, we show efficient detection of HPV-16 E7 peptide-specific IFN-γ-producing autologous T cells after multiple stimulations with HPV-16 E7-peptide-pulsed mature DC using an IFN-γ ELISPOT assay (Figure 4 and Table 1). In contrast, we could not detect HPV-16 E7-specific T cells with a previously used IFN-γ ELISA nor with a LDH release cytotoxicity assay (data not shown). This laborious detection of a HPV-16 E7-specific immune response in healthy donors could be due to multiple factors. The weak sensitivity of bulk assays such as ELISA and LDH release lysis assay can be an influencing factor. The sensitivity of ELISPOT is indeed higher than that of an ELISA. It is necessary to have at least 400 cells in an ELISA system to produce 1 pg of cytokine. In contrast, in an ELISPOT assay, one assumes that 1 IFN-γ-secreting cell is detectable among 5.105 cells [24]. Another important limiting factor is the low precursor frequency of HPV-specific CTL in healthy volunteers [8]. For example, one stimulation with peptide-pulsed mature DC does probably not induce sufficient expansion of HPV-16 E7-specific T cells. Therefore, the T cell stimulation protocol included a total of 5 weekly stimulations with HPV-16 E7-peptide-pulsed mature DC. Moreover, our results are in agreement with previous studies demonstrating the induction of an HPV-16 E7-specific immune response in healthy volunteers after multiple in vitro stimulations with autologous antigen-loaded mature DC [14, 15]. However, in contrast to Schoell et al. [14], we have used human AB serum instead of fetal calf serum in our experiments, in order to pave the way to future clinical application of this culture protocol. Moreover, the nature of the effector T cell population was more critically evaluated. By using the CD8β marker, we ascertained that the majority of the IFN-γ-producing effector population consists of CD8β+ T cells. Also, we excluded aspecific IFN-γ production by CD4+ T helper cells or NK cells by subtracting control values for our estimation of effector CD8+ T cell frequencies.

Conclusion

Taken together, we showed that peptide-pulsed mature DC are able to induce a cellular response against HPV-16 in 5/5 healthy volunteers, as detected by E7-specific IFN-γ producing CD8+ T cells in an ELISPOT analysis. The importance of this study is that it presents an efficient DC-based culture protocol for tumor antigen-specific T cells in pre-clinical vaccination studies. Moreover, our observations confirm the need for sensitive T cell detection methods, such as ELISPOT, for the detection of tumor specific immune responses in vitro.

Methods

Cell lines

K562-HLA-A*0201 cells were kindly provided by Dr. C. Britten (Johannnes-Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany) [23]. Cells were cultured in complete medium consisting of Iscove's modified Dulbecco's medium supplemented with L-glutamine (IMDM; Invitrogen, Paisley, UK), gentamicin (10 μg/mL, Invitrogen), amphotericin B (1.25 μg/mL Fungizone; Invitrogen) and 10 % heat inactivated fetal calf serum (FCS; Sera Lab, Sussex, UK) and the neomycin analogue G418 (0.5 mg/mL, Invitrogen). Cells were maintained in logarithmic phase growth at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere supplemented with 5% CO2.

HPV type 16 E7 peptide-specific T cell clone

The CD8+ D4 T cell clone recognizing the immunodominant HLA-A*0201-restricted HPV-16 E7 epitope (YMLDLQPETT) was a kind gift of Dr. S. Youde (University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff, UK). Cloned T cells (1.106) were expanded to large numbers in tissue culture flasks containing 50 mL IMDM supplemented with 10% human (h)AB serum (Sigma, Cambridge, UK) with 20.106 fresh irradiated (30 Gy) allogeneic peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from 2 donors, phytohemagglutin A (PHA) (1 μg/mL, Sigma) and interleukin (IL)-2 (200 U/mL, Biosource, Camarillo CA, USA). Fresh medium and IL-2 were added on day 5. On day 7, the T cells were transferred to a 24-well plate at 2.106 cells/well and cultured in the presence of 100 U/mL IL-2 for up to 14 days.

Source of primary cells

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were obtained from hemochromatosis patients after informed consent or from buffy coats provided by the Antwerp Blood Transfusion Center (Red Cross). Mononuclear cells were isolated by Ficoll-Hypaque gradient separation (LSM, ICN Biomedicals, Costa Mesa, CA, USA). Monocytes were directly isolated and used for DC culture, as described below.

In vitro culture of DC

Immature monocyte-derived DC were cultured from monocytes as described by Romani et al. [20] with minor modifications. Briefly, PBMC were allowed to adhere in serum-free AIM-V medium (Invitrogen) for 2 h at 37°C. The non-adherent cell fraction was cryopreserved in a solution consisting of 90% FCS and 10% DMSO and stored at -80°C until later use in DC/T cell co-cultures,. Adherent monocytes were further cultured for 6 days in IMDM supplemented with 5% hAB serum (Sigma). One hundred ng/mL granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF; Leucomax, Novartis Pharma, Basel, Switzerland) and 1000 U/mL IL-4 (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) were added to the cultures. Maturation of immature DC was induced on day 6 by adding a maturation cocktail consisting of 100 U/mL IL-1 (Biosource Europe, Nivelles, Belgium), 500 U/mL IL-6 (Biosource), 2.5 ng/mL tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Mannheim, Germany) and 10-7 M prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), as previously described by Jonuleit et al[22]. Mature DC were either directly used in DC/T cell co-culture or cryopreserved for further restimulations as previously described [21]. Briefly, cells were resuspended in a solution consisting of 90% FCS and 10% DMSO and were stored at -80°C until use.

Flow cytometry

Screening of blood donors for HLA-A*0201-positivity was performed on whole blood by incubation with the supernatant of the BB7-2 hybridoma (anti-HLA-A*0201; ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA), followed by staining with fluorescein (FITC)-conjugated rabbit anti-mouse immunoglobulins (DAKO Cytomation, Heverlee, Belgium). For phenotyping of cultured DC and T cell populations, the following murine anti-human monoclonal antibodies were used for direct immunofluorescence staining: CD80-FITC, CD83-phycoerythrin (PE) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), CD86-PE, CD3-peridinin chlorophyll-a protein (PerCP), CD14-PE, CD19-FITC, HLA-DR-PE, CD4-FITC, CD16-FITC, CD56-FITC, CD8-PE and CD8β-PE. Non-reactive isotype-matched antibodies were used as controls. All antibodies were purchased from Becton Dickinson (Erembodegem, Belgium), unless stated otherwise. Cells were stained with antibody for 15 min at 4°C, washed and surface labelling of living cells was analyzed by flow cytometry on a FACScan (Becton Dickinson).

Peptide pulsing of DC and K562-HLA-A*0201 cells

An HPV-16 HLA-A*0201-restricted E7 protein-specific peptide (E7; amino acids (aa) 11–20, YMLDLQPETT) was used for activation or for detection of HPV-16 E7 peptide-specific T cells, when pulsed on DC or on K562-HLA-A*0201 cells respectively. The peptides (>95% pure) were purchased from Eurogentec (Seraing, Belgium) and were dissolved in 100% DMSO to 10 mg/mL, further diluted to 1 mg/mL in serum-free IMDM and stored in aliquots at -80°C. The peptides were used at a final concentration of 20 μg/mL. DC or K562-HLA-A*0201 cells were washed once with IMDM and subsequently incubated (1.106 cells/mL) for 2 h at room temperature in 5-mL polystyrene tubes with 20 μg/mL peptide in serum-free IMDM supplemented with 2.5 μg/mL β2-microglobulin (Sigma). Peptide-pulsed DC and K562-HLA-A*0201 cells were used, respectively, as stimulators for T cells in DC/T cell co-cultures and as antigen-specific stimulator cells in an IFN-γ ELISPOT assay.

CD8+ T cell isolation

For DC/T cell co-culture experiments, frozen non-adherent PBMC were thawed and CD8+ T cells were isolated by magnetic separation using CD8 microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) according to manufacturer's instructions. Routinely, 10–20.106 CD8+ T cells were obtained starting from 100.106 cryopreserved non-adherent cells with purity levels ≥ 85%.

Induction of MHC class I-restricted HPV-16 E7-peptide-specific T cells

HPV-16 E7 peptide-pulsed mature monocyte-derived DC were used for stimulation of autologous CD8+ T cells. Multiple co-cultures of 15.103 peptide-pulsed DC with 15.104 purified CD8+ T cells were initiated in AIM-V medium supplemented with 5% hAB serum in 96-round bottom wells (Costar, Corning, NY, USA). After 7 days of co-culture, T cells were restimulated with 15.103 cryopreserved peptide-pulsed mature DC. At this point, additional cytokines were added to the co-cultures: 5 ng/mL IL-7 (Biosource) and 10 U/mL IL-2 (Biosource). Restimulation of cultured T cells was done weekly. After 5 stimulations, T cells were analyzed for antigen specificity in an IFN-γ ELISPOT assay.

IFN-γ release assays

HPV-16 E7 peptide-pulsed mature DC were used as stimulator cells for the E7 peptide-specific D4 CTL, while non-pulsed mature DC were used as control cells. CTL (2.105 cells) were co-incubated with stimulator cells (2.104 cells) in 96-round bottom plates for 6 hours at 37°C in a total volume of 200 μL IMDM supplemented with 5% hAB serum. Triplicate supernatant samples from these co-cultures were tested for IFN-γ secretion by an IFN-γ enzyme-linked immunosorbant assay (ELISA) (Biosource). Measurements are presented as pg/mL released IFN-γ by 2.105 CTL per 6 hours. Results are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. Comparisons were validated using Student's t test.

IFN-γ ELISPOT assay

K562-HLA-A*0201 cells, pulsed with HPV-16 E7 protein-specific peptide, were used as stimulators of cultured CD8+ T cells in an IFN-γ ELISPOT assay, while non-pulsed K562-HLA-A*0201 cells were used as control cells. Stimulator and responder cells were washed and resuspended in AIM-V supplemented with 5% hAB serum. Then, responder T cells (5.104 cells) were co-incubated with stimulator cells (1.104 cells) overnight at 37°C in anti-IFN-γ antibody coated 96-well PVDF-plates (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA) in a total volume of 100 μL. These plates were further analyzed for IFN-γ secretion by IFN-γ ELISPOT staining technique (Diaclone, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) according to manufacturer's instructions. Frequencies of antigen-specific IFN-γ-secreting cells were calculated based on the number of responder cells and the number of spots per well after subtraction of background. Responses were considered positive if a minimum of 15 spot-forming cells (SFC) were counted after the control had been subtracted and if the ratio of SFC between positive experiments and their respective control was larger than 3.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants no. G.0456.03, G.0313.01 and WO.012.02 of the Fund for Scientific Research – Flanders, Belgium (FWO-Vlaanderen), by grants of the Fortis Bank Verzekeringen – financed Cancer Research, by research grants of the Foundation against Cancer (Belgische Federatie tegen Kanker, now Stichting tegen Kanker) Belgium and by grant no, 802 of the Antwerp University Concerted Research Action (BOF-GOA). VFIVT and PP are postdoctoral fellows of FWO-Vlaanderen. NC and PP held a PhD fellowship of the Flemish Institute for Science and Technology (IWT).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, Faculty of Medicine, Antwerp University, Antwerp University Hospital

References

  1. Pisani P, Bray F, Parkin DM: Estimates of the world-wide prevalence of cancer for 25 sites in the adult population. Int J Cancer. 2002, 97: 72-81. 10.1002/ijc.1571View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Parkin DM: Global cancer statistics in the year 2000. Lancet Oncol. 2001, 2: 533-543. 10.1016/S1470-2045(01)00486-7View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Landoni F, Maneo A, Colombo A, Placa F, Milani R, Perego P, Favini G, Ferri L, Mangioni C: Randomised study of radical surgery versus radiotherapy for stage Ib-Iia cervical cancer. Lancet. 1997, 350: 535-540. 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)02250-2View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Thomas GM: Improved treatment for cervical cancer – concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy. N Engl J Med. 1999, 340: 1198-1200. 10.1056/NEJM199904153401509View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Berger TG, Schultz ES: Dendritic cell-based immunotherapy. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2003, 276: 169-197.Google Scholar
  6. Santini SM, Belardelli F: Advances in the use of dendritic cells and new adjuvants for the development of therapeutic vaccines. Stem Cells. 2003, 21: 495-505. 10.1634/stemcells.21-4-495View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Jager E, Jager D, Knuth A: Antigen-specific immunotherapy and cancer vaccines. Int J Cancer. 2003, 106: 817-820. 10.1002/ijc.11292View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bosch FX, Manos MM, Munoz N, Sherman M, Jansen AM, Peto J, Schiffman MH, Moreno V, Kurman R, Shah KV: Prevalence of human papillomavirus in cervical cancer: a worldwide perspective. International biological study on cervical cancer (IBSCC) Study Group. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995, 87: 796-801.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Schwarz E, Freese UK, Gissmann L, Mayer W, Roggenbuck B, Stremlau A, zur Hausen H: Sructure and transcription of human papillomavirus sequences in cervical carcinoma cells. Nature. 1985, 314: 111-114. 10.1038/314111a0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Munger K, Phelps WC, Bubb V, Howley PM, Schlegel R: The E6 and E7 genes of human papillomavirus type 16 are necessary and sufficient for transformation of primary human keratinocytes. J Virol. 1989, 63: 4417-4423.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Ressing ME, van Driel WJ, Celis E, Sette A, Brandt MP, Hartman M, Anholts JD, Schreuder GM, ter Harmsel WB, Fleuren GJ, Trimbos BJ, Kast WM, Melief CJ: Occasional memory cytotoxic T cell responses of patients with human papillomavirus type 16-positive cervical lesions. Cancer Res. 1996, 56: 582-588.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Evans EM, Man S, Evans AS, Borysiewicz LK: Infiltration of cervical cancer tissue with human papillomavirus-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocytes. Cancer Res. 1997, 57: 2943-2950.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Ressing ME, Sette A, Brandt RM, Ruppert J, Wentworth PA, Hartman M, Oseroff C, Grey HM, Melief CJ, Kast WM: Human CTL epitopes encoded by human papillomavirus type 16 E6 and E7 identified through in vivo and in vitro immunogenicity studies. J Immunol. 1995, 154: 5934-5943.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Schoell WM, Mirhashemi R, Liu B, Janicek MF, Podack ER, Penalver MA, Averette HE: Generation of tumor-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes by stimulation with HPV type 16 E7 peptide-pulsed dendritic cells: an approach to immunotherapy of cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 1999, 74: 448-55. 10.1006/gyno.1999.5504View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Nonn M, Schinz M, Zumbach K, Pawlita M, Schneider A, Durst M, Kaufmann AM: Dendritic cell-based tumor vaccine for cervical cancer I: in vitro stimulation with recombinant protein-pulsed dendritic cells induces specific T cells to HPV16 E7 or HPV18 E7. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2003, 129: 511-20. 10.1007/s00432-003-0462-6View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Ferrara A, Nonn M, Sehr P, Schreckenberger C, Pawlita M, Durst M, Schneider A, Kaufmann AM: Dendritic cell-based tumor vaccine for cervical cancer II: results of a clinical pilot study in 15 individual patients. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2003, 129: 521-30. 10.1007/s00432-003-0463-5View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Herbst B, Lindemann A: Dendritic cells for immunotherapy. Biomedical Progress. 1998, 11: 1-6.Google Scholar
  18. Banchereau J, Steinman RM: Dendritic cells and the control of immunity. Nature. 1998, 392: 245-252. 10.1038/32588View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Matzinger P: The danger model: A renewed sense on self. Science. 2002, 296: 301-5. 10.1126/science.1071059View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Romani N, Gruner S, Brang D, Kampgen E, Lenz A, Trockenbacher B, Konwalinka G, Fritsch PO, Steinman RM, Schuler G: Proliferating dendritic cell progenitors in human blood. J Exp Med. 1994, 180: 83-93. 10.1084/jem.180.1.83View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Ponsaerts P, Van Tendeloo VF, Cools N, Van Driessche A, Lardon F, Nijs G, Lenjou M, Mertens G, Van Broeckhoven C, Van Bockstaele DR, Berneman ZN: mRNA-electroporated mature dendritic cells retain transgene expression, phenotypical properties and stimulatory capacity after cryopreservation. Leukemia. 2002, 16: 1324-30. 10.1038/sj.leu.2402511View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Jonuleit H, Kuhn U, Muller G, Steinbrink K, Paragnik L, Schmitt E, Knop J, Enk AH: Pro-inflammatory cytokines and prostaglandins induce maturation of potent immunostimulatory dendritic cells under fetal calf serum-free conditions. Eur J Immunol. 1997, 27: 3135-42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Britten CM, Meyer RG, Kreer T, Drexler I, Wolfel T, Herr W: The use of HLA-A*0201-transfected K562 as standard antigen-presenting cells for CD8(+) T lymphocytes in IFN-gamma ELISPOT assays. J Immunol Methods. 2002, 259: 95-110. 10.1016/S0022-1759(01)00499-9View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Tanguay S, Killion JJ: Direct comparison of ELISPOT and ELISA-based assay for detection of individual cytokine-secreting cells. Lymphokine Cytokine Res. 1994, 13: 259-263.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Cools et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement