- Open Access
Expression of the neuron-specific protein CHD5 is an independent marker of outcome in neuroblastoma
© Garcia et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 25 January 2010
Accepted: 15 October 2010
Published: 15 October 2010
The chromodomain, helicase DNA-binding protein 5 (CHD5) is a potential tumor suppressor gene located on chromosome 1p36, a region recurrently deleted in high risk neuroblastoma (NB). Previous data have shown that CHD5 mRNA is present in normal neural tissues and in low risk NB, nevertheless, the distribution of CHD5 protein has not been explored. The aim of this study was to investigate CHD5 protein expression as an immunohistochemical marker of outcome in NB. With this purpose, CHD5 protein expression was analyzed in normal neural tissues and neuroblastic tumors (NTs). CHD5 gene and protein expression was reexamined after induction chemotherapy in a subset of high risk tumors to identify potential changes reflecting tumor response.
We provide evidence that CHD5 is a neuron-specific protein, absent in glial cells, with diverse expression amongst neuron types. Within NTs, CHD5 immunoreactivity was found restricted to differentiating neuroblasts and ganglion-like cells, and absent in undifferentiated neuroblasts and stromal Schwann cells. Correlation between protein and mRNA levels was found, suggesting transcriptional regulation of CHD5. An immunohistochemical analysis of 90 primary NTs highlighted a strong association of CHD5 expression with favorable prognostic variables (age at diagnosis <12 months, low clinical stage, and favorable histology; P < 0.001 for all), overall survival (OS) (P < 0.001) and event-free survival (EFS) (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that CHD5 prognostic value is independent of other clinical and biologically relevant parameters, and could therefore represent a marker of outcome in NB that can be tested by conventional immunohistochemistry. The prognostic value of CHD5 was confirmed in an independent, blinded set of 32 NB tumors (P < 0.001).
Reactivation of CHD5 expression after induction chemotherapy was observed mainly in those high risk tumors with induced tumor cell differentiation features. Remarkably, these NB tumors showed good clinical response and prolonged patient survival.
The neuron-specific protein CHD5 may represent a marker of outcome in NB that can be tested by conventional immunohistochemistry. Re-establishment of CHD5 expression induced by chemotherapy could be a surrogate marker of treatment response.
Neuroblastic tumors (NTs) are embryonal cancers arising from neural crest derived sympathetic nervous system precursors. These neoplasms are the most common extracranial solid tumors in childhood and account for approximately 15% of all pediatric oncology deaths .
Neuroblastoma (NB), the most undifferentiated form of NTs, embodies a heterogeneous spectrum of diseases whereby patients with similar clinicopathological features exhibit radically different outcomes ranging from spontaneous regression to inexorable progression. Since treatment strategies vary from a "watchful waiting" approach to multimodal intensive regimens, precise risk assessment is critical for therapeutic decisions. Various combinations of prognostic markers have been used with success for risk group distinction, including clinical, histologic and genetic factors, yet there remain cases where established indicators of aggressiveness have demonstrated limited clinical utility. Additional parameters are therefore needed for a more precise identification and therapeutic targeting of high risk NB patients.
There is an apparent link between NB aggressiveness and specific genetic aberrations. One of the most recurrent genetic alterations described is the deletion of the short arm of chromosome 1 found in approximately 35% of NB . The high incidence of chromosome 1p deletion in human cancer , with 1p36 deletion being the most common alteration , has led to an extensive search for 1p36 tumor suppressor genes. Recent findings have identified the CHD5 gene as a candidate tumor suppressor [4, 5] mapping to the smallest region of deletion (SRD) described in NB, 1p36.31 . Evidence supporting CHD5 as a tumor suppressor is the recently reported strong promoter methylation and transcriptional silencing of the remaining allele in 1p deleted NB cell lines . Nevertheless, low or absent CHD5 expression levels have been found in NB cell lines lacking promoter methylation , 1p deletion, or inactivating mutations , suggesting other mechanisms by which CHD5 expression may be inhibited.
CHD5 is one of the nine members of the chromodomain helicase DNA-binding (CHD) family of enzymes that belong to the ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling protein SNF2 superfamily . CHD protein structure is characterized by two N-terminal chromodomains and a SNF2-like ATPase central domain that defines the chromodomain remodeling proteins [9, 10]. The members of this evolutionarily conserved class of proteins play a critical role in organizing the chromatin structure and accordingly, in chromatin based transcriptional regulation of genes.
The aberrant expression of some of the CHD genes has been associated with human disease processes like CHARGE syndrome, Hodgkin's lymphoma or dermatomyositis . CHD5 mRNA expression, restricted to neuronal-derived tissues and the adrenal gland in normal tissues , is basically absent in NB primary tumors with high risk features, MYCN amplification, advanced stage and 1p monosomy .
The distribution of CHD5 protein in NTs and normal neural tissues has not been explored. Like neural tissue, NTs consist of two main cell populations, neuroblastic cells and Schwann-like cells. The malignant potential of these tumors is inherently dependent on the proportion of immature neuroblastic cells and the abundance of Schwann cell stromal component, Schwannian stroma-poor undifferentiated NB being the most malignant. CHD5 expression remains to be investigated in these two cell populations. In the present study, we analyzed by immunohistochemistry normal neural derived tissues and NTs to visualize CHD5 protein distribution within the different cell populations. Because impaired CHD5 expression is associated with high risk NB tumors, we asked whether CHD5 protein expression might serve as an immunohistochemical marker of outcome in NB. It is known that gene expression pattern can change with treatment, for this reason, CHD5 gene and protein expression was re-examined after induction treatment in a set of paired cases.
Material and Methods
Patients and tumor samples
A total of 90 primary tumor specimens (63 NB, 14 ganglioneuroblastomas (GNB) and 13 ganglioneuromas (GN)) (Additional file 1) were obtained at diagnosis from two institutions (Hospital Sant Joan de Déu (HSJD) of Barcelona and Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) of New York) together with 12 high risk NB cases with available paired diagnostic and post-chemotherapy tumor specimens. An independent set of 32 NB tumors was obtained from Children's Hospital of Boston and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (CHB/DFCI) for data validation analysis. Non-tumor samples (fetal brain, adult cerebral cortex, adult cerebellum, adrenal gland, bone marrow, spinal cord and sympathetic ganglion) were also included in this study.
NB risk assessment was defined by the International Neuroblastoma Staging System (INSS) . NB stages 1, 2, 3 (MYCN non-amplified) and 4s were uniformly treated without use of cytotoxic therapy, when possible. Stage 4 and stage 3 MYCN amplified NB patients were treated according to N5, N6 or N7 protocols. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards and informed consent was obtained before collection of samples.
Tumors were assessed by a pathologist (M.S.), only tumors with >70% viable tumor cell content were included in the study.
Seven NB cell lines (LA-N-1, SKNSH-SY5Y, SK-N-Be(2)C, SKNSH-EP1, SK-N-JD, SK-N-LP and SK-N-AS) were used in this study. NB cell lines were cultured in RPMI-1640 supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 2 mM L-glutamine and penicillin (100 U/ml) and streptomycin (100 μg/ml) (GIBCO, Invitrogen, US) at 37°C in 5% CO2 atmosphere.
In vivo study
NB cell lines SK-N-JD, SK-N-LP and SK-N-AS were harvested and resuspended in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) solution and BD Matrigel Basement Membrane Matrix (BD Biosciences, US). One hundred microliters of cell suspension containing 8 × 106 cells were subcutaneously inoculated into the right flank of six-week old CD-1 Nude (nu/nu) mice (Charles River Laboratories, Europe). Mice were killed when NB cell lines developed tumors that exceeded 1.5 cm3. Tumors were removed surgically, fixed in 10% formalin and embedded in paraffin for histological examination.
Immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis was performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues using rabbit-polyclonal anti-CHD5 antibody (Strategic Diagnostics, DE) at a 1:1000 dilution for 1 hour; mouse-polyclonal anti-Neurofilament protein, 68kD (NF68) antibody (Zymed, US) 1:300 dilution, 1 hour and mouse-polyclonal anti-Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) antibody (Novocastra, UK) 1:200 dilution, 2 min. Two different anti-CHD5 antibody batches (T00251-A1 and T00251-A02, Strategic Diagnostics, DE) have been tested in this study. Normal human brain was used as positive control.
Slides were examined by a pathologist (M.S.) using an Olympus BX41 light microscopy to assess staining and score both percentage of positive cells and staining intensity (0, negative; 1, weak; 2, strong and 3, very intense staining). Integer values were assigned to the proportion of positive cells (<25% = 1; 25-75 = 2; >75% = 3). Intensity and positive cell values were multiplied to provide a single score for each case.
Double fluorescent immunostaining: Paraformaldehyde (4%, pH 7.4) fixed cryosections, blocked with bovine serum albumin (BSA) 1% for 1 hour, were incubated overnight at 4°C with a rabbit-polyclonal anti-CHD5 antibody (H-185) (Santa Cruz, US) at 1:1000 dilution, followed by anti-rabbit IgG Cy3-conjugated antibody, (Sigma, US) 1:400 dilution for 45 min. Sections were subsequently incubated with anti-NF68 antibody (1:300 dilution) 1 hour or anti-GFAP antibody (1:200 dilution) 2 min, and stained with anti-mouse IgG FITC-conjugated antibody (Sigma, US) 1:700 dilution, 45 min. Nuclei were counterstained with 4'6-diamino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (Sigma, US), 1:5000 dilution, 5 min.
Paraformaldehyde fixed bone marrow aggregates were incubated with anti-GD2 antibody (BD Biosciences, US) 1:800 dilution 1 hour and stained with anti-mouse IgG-FITC antibody at 1:700 dilution, 45 min, or with anti-CHD5 antibody as described above.
Immunoreactivity was evaluated with a Leica epifluorescence DM5000B microscope (Leica Microsystems, US).
Western blot analysis
Proteins were extracted from cell lines and homogenized tissue in lysis buffer (20 mM Tris pH 8.8, 80 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40 and protease inhibitors). Protein concentrations were quantified using the Bradford method (Bio-Rad laboratories, US) and 30 μg of protein were resolved on an 8% SDS-PAGE. Membranes were incubated with polyclonal anti-CHD5 antibody (1:2000; Strategic Diagnostics, DE) and monoclonal anti β-actin antibody (1:5000; Sigma, US) and detected with donkey anti-rabbit IgG HRP-conjugated antibody (1:2500; Affinity BioReagents, Inc., US) and goat anti-mouse IgG HRP-conjugated antibody (1:5000; Sigma, US) respectively. Antibody conjugates were visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL, Amersham Life Science, US).
RNA isolation and cDNA synthesis
Total RNA was isolated from snap frozen samples and cell lines using Tri Reagent (Sigma, US), following manufacturers' protocols. cDNA was synthesized from 1 μg total RNA using random primers and M-MLV reverse transcriptase (Promega, US) as previously described .
Quantitative Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction (qRT-PCR)
Quantification of transcript levels, using the ΔΔCT relative quantification method, were performed on an ABI Prism 7000 Sequence Detection System with TaqMan® Assay-on-Demand Gene Expression products (Applied Biosystems, US), as previously reported .
Comparisons between immunohistochemical results were performed by means of the log-rank test. qRT-PCR transcript levels were normalized by z-score transformation to enable a correlation analysis with the immunostaining score values. Correspondence between immunoreactivity and mRNA expression levels within the same samples was examined using the Spearman's correlation coefficient analysis. Statistical analyses for qualitative variables were performed by means of the Fisher's exact test and U Mann-Whitney test for quantitative or ordinal variables. Overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) probabilities were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate Cox regression models were used to examine the prognostic significance of CHD5, INSS stage, age at diagnosis, MYCN status and 1p LOH. Each variable consisted of two groups: "INSS stage" consisted of: (1) ST1, 2, 3 and 4s, and (2) ST4; "age" (at diagnosis): (1) ≤ 12 months (2) > 12 months; "MYCN": (1) MYCN non-amplified (2) MYCN amplified; "LOH": (1) no LOH (2) LOH. Predictive Positive and Negative Values (PPV and NPV) were used for a descriptive comparison between CHD5 expression and MYCN and 1p LOH. All reported P-values are two-sided. P-values ≤0.05 were considered statistically significant. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 15.0 package (SPSS, Chicago, IL).
CHD5 protein expression in normal neural tissues is restricted to neuronal cells
Intensity and intracellular localization of CHD5 staining in the cerebral cortex varied among neuron types but did not exhibit a layer-related expression (Figure 1A). Nuclear labeling was intense in morphologically small neurons with scarce cytoplasm present in all cortical layers identified by size and location as interneurons. Larger neurons with triangular shaped soma, including pyramidal neurons present in cortical layers III, IV and V, exhibited essentially negative or lower intensity of nuclear staining and diffuse cytoplasm reactivity (Figure 1A). In the cerebellum, Purkinje cells and deep nuclei neurons exhibited intense nuclear and diffuse cytoplasm staining. Cerebellar granular layer neurons lacked immunoreactivity (Figure 1C).
Spinal cord specimens were characterized by intense positive neuron processes, predominantly located in the external white matter, and large motoneuron cell bodies with positive cytoplasm and mostly negative nuclear staining (Figure 1D). All glial cells, including the ependymal cells lining the central canal of the spinal cord, were negative for CHD5 expression (Figure 1D*). In the sympathetic ganglia, neuron cell bodies showed intense nuclear and diffuse cytoplasm reactivity, while the stromal cell component was found negative for CHD5 (Figure 1E).
Adrenal gland specimens exhibited weak CHD5 expression, mainly in the nucleus of the medullary cells. Neuroblastic aggregates found in fetal adrenal glands (19-20 weeks) were essentially negative, although few intermixed positive cells were identified in larger neuroblastic islets (Figure 1F).
CHD5 expression was evaluated in brain cortex specimens and in NB cell lines by immunoblot analysis. CHD5 protein (250-260 kDa) was detected only in brain cortex specimens, both in the total protein extract and in the nuclear fraction. No CHD5 protein was detected in the cytoplasmic fraction of all the analyzed specimens or in NB cell lines (Figure 1B).
These results identify CHD5 as a neuron-specific protein, absent in glial cells, with a diverse expression pattern amongst neuron types. Human immature neuroblastic aggregates in the developing adrenal gland are mostly negative for CHD5.
CHD5 protein is expressed in the neuroblastic component of low clinical risk NTs
CHD5 inmunostaining in Neuroblastic tumors.
Percentage of CHD5 immunopositive neuroblastic cells
Loco-regional tumors (stage 1, 2, and 3) displayed more heterogeneous expression patterns (Figure 2B and 2C; Additional file 1), with staining values being highest in differentiating NB, where intense nuclear staining was observed in >75% of neuroblastic cells (13/32) (Figure 2B; Additional file 1), and lowest in stage 3 MYCN amplified NB composed mainly of undifferentiated neuroblasts with undetectable immunoreactivity, similar to stage 4 NB cases (Figure 2C, Table 1, Additional file 1).
GNB (14/14) and GN (13/13) tumors exhibited ganglion-like cells with intense nuclear and diffuse cytoplasm staining. Absence of nuclear staining and feeble cytoplasmic reactivity was observed in Schwann-like cells (Figure 2D; Additional file 1). The undifferentiated neuroblastic component of GNB lacked CHD5 staining (Table 1, Additional file 1).
The described immunohistochemical assays were performed using two different batches of the anti-CHD5 antibody (T00251-A1 and T00251-A02). Both batches performed consistently across many repeats, further supporting the validity of our results (Additional file 2A). The specificity of the anti-CHD5 antibody was further validated on mouse xenografts of human NB cell lines (SK-N-JD, SK-N-LP and SK-N-AS). All the xenografts were found to be negative for CHD5 staining (Additional file 2B).
Altogether, CHD5 protein was expressed in the nucleus of neuroblastic cells of clinical low risk NTs. In stage 4s NB, CHD5 negative neuroblast bone marrow metastasis imply the existence of intratumoral clones with CHD5 differential expression in an otherwise histologically homogeneous tumor subtype.
CHD5 transcript levels are associated with protein expression
CHD5 protein expression was contrasted with gene transcript levels. Quantification of CHD5 mRNA in non-tumoral frozen tissue samples using qRT-PCR identified high expression in fetal brain and adult cerebral cortex, as reported previously . Normal bone marrow specimens lacked CHD5 expression.
CHD5 mRNA levels were analyzed for 84 primary NTs obtained at diagnosis (23 stage 4; 7 stage 4s; 34 loco-regional NB; 9 GNB and 11 GN); 55 of these tumors were also analyzed by immunohistochemistry.
High risk undifferentiated NB tumors, stage 4 and stage 3 MYCN-amplified NB displayed significantly lower mRNA expression levels than stage 1, 2, 3 (P < 0.001) and stage 4s NB (P = 0.001) (Additional file 3). The highest mean expression values, similar to normal fetal brain, were found for stage 4s NB. GN specimens displayed consistently low CHD5 transcript levels, whereas, GNB tumors were characterized by highly variable expression attributable to the presence of CHD5 negative component, Schwann-like stroma and undifferentiated neuroblasts, besides the positive ganglion-like cells that compose these tumors.
Correlation between CHD5 immunoreactivity and mRNA expression levels within the same samples was examined in a set of 34 consecutive NB tumors. Immunohistochemical and qRT-PCR analyses were carried out on the same portion of the tumor specimen, with similar cell composition and a high tumor cell content (>70% as recommended for PCR studies). CHD5 nuclear immunoreactivity was assigned a staining score (Additional file 1) and gene expression values were z-score transformed. A significant correlation was observed between mRNA and protein levels (Spearman's rho = 0.774; P < 0.001), low CHD5 protein scores were consistently associated with low mRNA levels (negative z-score values), and high IHC scores with high mRNA expression (positive z-score values) (Additional file 4). Interestingly, very intense nuclear staining displayed by low risk tumors, mostly stage 4s and infant stage 1 NB, was not associated with the highest transcript levels (Additional file 4, cases # 1-6, 30, 31 and 33).
These results reveal a correspondence between CHD5 protein and mRNA expression, suggesting a potential regulation of CHD5 expression at the transcriptional level.
CHD5 protein expression is associated with patient outcome in NB
CHD5 nuclear immunoreactivity was assigned a staining score (Additional file 1) and compared to clinical and biological variables currently used for NB risk classification. High CHD5 staining values were found to be significantly associated with INSS stages 1, 2, 3 (MYCN non-amplified) and 4s NB (n = 63), age at diagnosis <12 m (n = 63) and favorable tumor histology (n = 63); P < 0.001 for all the tested variables.
Cox regression analysis.
HR and 95%CI
HR and 95%CI
Age (>12 m)
Age (>12 m)
Event Free Survival
HR and 95%CI
HR and 95%CI
Interaction p-value &
7.01 (2.09 to 23.51)
1.26 (0.53 to 2.97)
7.04 (2.24 to 22.09)
Age (>12 m)
Age (>12 m)
1.36 (0.54 to 3.44)
5.97 (1.98 to 17.98)
2.72 (1.07 to 6.88)
6.02 (1.98 to 18.34)
1.24 (0.52 to 2.95)
Analysis of the Predictive Value was performed for a descriptive comparison between CHD5 expression and MYCN and 1p LOH.
Event Free Survival
Comparison of sensitivity, specificity and accuracy rate between CHD5 expression, MYCN status and 1p LOH.
Event Free Survival
The prognostic value of CHD5 expression was validated on an independent, blinded set of 32 FFPE primary NB tumors of patients diagnosed and treated at the Children's Hospital of Boston (n = 21) and HSJD of Barcelona (n = 11). Kaplan-Meier analysis and a log-rank test showed a statistically significant difference in OS (log-rank test P = 0.001) and EFS (log-rank test P < 0.0001) between patients with high and low CHD5 expression scores (Figure 3C and 3D). Tumors with high IHC scores were associated with longer survival (mean 73 months) in comparison with low expressing tumors (mean 46 months).
These results suggest that CHD5 protein expression is a potential prognostic marker of outcome in NB patients.
CHD5 expression reactivation is associated with tumor response to induction therapy
In contrast, low gene and protein expression levels persisted in the 6 remaining post-therapy specimens (6 stage 4 NB; 3/6 MYCN amplified and 1p36 deleted tumors) (Figure 4A and 4C; cases #7-12). Therapy induced neuroblastic differentiation was observed in only one of these samples (case #7), a stage 4 NB with aberrant morphological changes. All 6 patients died of rapid disease progression with no signs of clinical response; with a mean survival of 12.73 months (Figure 4B).
These observations suggest a relationship between CHD5 expression reactivation and response to induction therapy and subsequent patient outcome.
Gene expression of CHD5, an ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling enzyme, has been reported to be restricted essentially to the nervous system [8, 10]. We describe for the first time that CHD5 is a neuron specific protein in normal neural tissue, with variable immunostaining intensity and intracellular localization among the neuron types of the cerebral cortex. Recent evidences suggest that the diverse neuron cell classes derive from distinct embryonal germinal zones and are characterized by specific cell signaling systems that regulate neural stem cells throughout the developing brain [13–15]. Thus, neuronal cells adopt a brain layer fate determined by their molecular profiles . While we did not observe a layer specific distribution of CHD5 in the cerebral cortex, we did note an association of CHD5 expression with neurons with distinct morphological, physiological and neurochemical features.
In normal neural tissue, glial cells appeared consistently devoid of CHD5 expression. In human glial tumors, chromosome arm 1p allelic loss is a frequent genetic abnormality, especially in oligodendrogliomas (70-85%) and astrocytomas (20-30%) . Recently, low levels of CHD5 expression have been reported in gliomas with 1p deletion, whereas nondeleted tumors displayed expression levels comparable to normal brain . Thus, deletion of CHD5 has been proposed as an initiating event in gliomas . Our findings, however, suggest that the role of CHD5 as a tumor suppressor in glial tumors needs further investigation.
NTs are embryonal cancers that are assumed to originate from primitive sympathetic neuroblast aggregates located in neural crest derived sympathetic nervous system. We observed how primitive neuroblast aggregates found in fetal adrenal gland specimens generally lack CHD5 expression. Interestingly, only a few cells were found with a variable degree of nuclear reactivity in larger aggregates. To date, the fate of these immature neuroblastic aggregates remains unsolved, and spontaneous involution and cell maturation have been proposed . The immunoreactivity observed in a small proportion of neuroblasts within these islets could suggest the establishment of CHD5 expression prior to their disappearance; however, no evident differentiating features were observed in these immunopositive cells that suggested the activation of the maturation process.
In NTs, CHD5 is essentially expressed in the nucleus of differentiating neuroblastic cells and ganglion cells, and absent in the Schwannian stromal component. However, the most intense immunoreactivity was observed in stage 4s NB, a rare subgroup of histologically undifferentiated, highly proliferative, metastatic tumors with a high incidence of spontaneous regression, affecting young infants. Accurate distinction of spontaneously regressing infant NB from high risk infant stage 4 can be difficult, but critical for therapeutic decisions. In our hands, the intensely positive CHD5 nuclear staining enabled a clear distinction of stage 4s NB from stage 4 NB, which was consistently immunonegative. These results are consistent with our previous gene expression profiling study, where similar differential CHD5 expression profiles were observed amongst infants with disseminated NB subgroups . Thus, CHD5 immunohistochemical staining may be clinically useful for a more accurate characterization of disseminated infant NB.
In NB, CHD5 nuclear staining was strongly associated with established favorable prognostic variables like low clinical stage, age at diagnosis <12 months and favorable histology. Our findings suggest that CHD5 protein expression may accurately define NB risk groups and may, therefore, be a prognostic marker. Evidence is provided by the statistically significant association found between high CHD5 immunoreactivity and favorable OS and EFS. These results are consistent with recent studies reporting a strong association of CHD5 mRNA levels with patient outcome in NB [5, 10]. Furthermore, Cox multivariate analyses suggest that the prognostic value of CHD5 protein expression is independent of other clinical and biological variables currently used in risk stratification of NB patients and could therefore represent an immunohistochemical marker of prognosis in NB.
Currently, risk stratification of NB patients is performed by combining different markers with strong prognostic impact, including patients' age at diagnosis, tumor stage, genomic amplification of the oncogene MYCN, copy number alterations of chromosomal regions 1p, 11q and 17q, tumor DNA content [1, 19] and Shimada histological score . However, despite elaborate risk stratification strategies, outcome prediction in neuroblastoma is still deficient. In recent years, to improve risk assessment additional prognostic indicators such as gene-expression signatures [21–23], combined genomic and molecular signatures  or expression levels of single candidate genes, e.g., Trk (NTRK) family of neurotrophin receptors [25, 26], FYN , PRAME  and ZNF423 , have been associated with NB clinical behavior. Expression of the Trk family receptors has been the most extensively characterized marker in NB and has been found to be consistently correlated with the biology and clinical behavior of NB. Based on our results, there is an apparent similarity between the expression patterns of CHD5 and TRKA in NB and their patterns of association with NB disease outcome. TRKA expression has been reported to be high in biologically favorable NB tumors and inversely associated with MYCN amplification . The prognostic value of the immunohistochemical detection of TrkA has also been examined and reported to be high, especially in combination with Ha-Ras expression pattern [31, 32]. Further IHC studies have correlated the lack of TrkA expression with metastatic malignant NB . However, in the latter study, 34% of the patients with stage 4 NB displayed TrkA expression, a subset of which died of aggressive metastatic disease despite TrkA expression [33, 34]. In our study, the majority of stage 4 NB either lacked CHD5 immunoreactivity (83%) or exhibited weak nuclear staining (13%), a high risk phenotype according to our scoring system. Only one stage 4 tumor was found to be clearly immunoreactive for CHD5; at the time of analysis the patient is alive, 29 months from diagnosis. These observations further confirm CHD5 as a powerful prognostic marker that could complement other known markers such as age at diagnosis, stage, MYCN status, cellular DNA content, 1p deletion and tumor histology. However, the potential clinical use of this marker must be tested in larger, prospective cohorts.
It is known that tumor histology and gene expression can change with treatment as a result of important changes in cellular processes, e.g., induced tumor differentiation, DNA repair, apoptosis and tissue necrosis. Undifferentiated NB occasionally exhibit neuroblastic maturation in response to chemotherapy. Assessment of CHD5 gene and protein expression in NB post-therapy specimens revealed that tumors with evident neuroblastic maturation showed both CHD5 gene and protein reactivation. Notably, none of these tumors harbored 1p deletion. Conversely, in tumors where minimal or no morphological changes were observed in the post-treatment specimens, low CHD5 expression persisted. These observations suggest the existence of a subset of tumors within high risk NB where CHD5 expression can be reactivated from the silenced state by standard chemotherapy. Remarkably, when post-therapy reactivation was observed, CHD5 expression was largely associated with disease response to cytotoxic induction therapy and subsequently with longer patient OS. All 12 patients included in the study received the same treatment, nevertheless some tumors failed to respond. At present, treatment response in NB is routinely evaluated by monitoring urine levels of catecholamine and its metabolites (VMA/HVA ratio) and by estimating the decrease in the size of measurable lesions with conventional imaging modalities, such as computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). At the time of second-look surgery, the degree of induced tumor cell differentiation and the extent of necrosis can also be useful to estimate treatment response. However, no biological markers for tumor chemotherapy responsiveness have been reported in NB. The use of such biomarkers would make chemotherapy more effective for individual patients by allowing timely changes of therapy in the case of nonresponding tumors. Furthermore, markers reflecting tumor response can function as surrogates of long-term outcome. Taking into account the small cohort of cases that may have led to an overestimation of the data, our findings would suggest that restoration of CHD5 expression could be a surrogate marker of treatment response that can be clinically useful to identify patients that do not benefit from conventional treatment. These results warrant further investigation in a larger cohort of uniformly treated patients.
In summary, we report that the differential expression of the neuron-specific protein CHD5 accurately defines NB risk groups and may represent a marker of outcome in neuroblastoma that can be tested by conventional immunohistochemistry. In high risk NB patients, re-establishment of CHD5 expression following chemotherapy should be tested prospectively as a surrogate marker of treatment response.
Authors thank Dr. B. Spengler (Fordham University, New York) and Dr. N.K.V. Cheung (MSKCC, New York) for annotated NB cell lines; the Neural Tissue Bank (Hospital Clínic, Barcelona) for normal brain samples and the Department of Audiovisual Systems (HSJD, Barcelona) for technical assistance. This study was supported by grants from the Spanish Ministry of Health (PI070286), Spanish Society against Cancer (Asociación Española Contra el Cáncer, 2007), the Catalan government (2005SGR00605; 2006FI00404), and the generous donations from Margarita del Pozo and Alicia Pueyo Foundations.
- Maris JM, Hogarty MD, Bagatell R, Cohn SL: Neuroblastoma. Lancet. 2007, 369: 2106-2120. 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60983-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Weith A, Brodeur GM, Bruns GA, Matise TC, Mischke D, Nizetic D, Seldin MF, van Roy N, Vance J: Report of the second international workshop on human chromosome 1 mapping 1995. Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1996, 72: 114-144. 10.1159/000134173View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fong CT, Dracopoli NC, White PS, Merrill PT, Griffith RC, Housman DE, Brodeur GM: Loss of heterozygosity for the short arm of chromosome 1 in human neuroblastoma: correlation with N-myc amplification. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1989, 86: 3753-3757. 10.1073/pnas.86.10.3753PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bagchi A, Papazoglu C, Wu Y, Capurso D, Brodt M, Francis D, Bredel M, Vogel H, Mills AA: CHD5 is a tumor suppressor at human 1p36. Cell. 2007, 128: 459-475. 10.1016/j.cell.2006.11.052View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fujita T, Igarashi J, Okawa ER, Gotoh T, Manne J, Kolla V, Kim J, Zhao H, Pawel BR, London WB, Maris JM, White PS, Brodeur GM: CHD5, a tumor suppressor gene deleted from 1p36.31 in neuroblastomas. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008, 100: 940-949. 10.1093/jnci/djn176PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Okawa ER, Gotoh T, Manne J, Igarashi J, Fujita T, Silverman KA, Xhao H, Mosse YP, White PS, Brodeur GM: Expression and sequence analysis of candidates for the 1p36.31 tumor suppressor gene deleted in neuroblastomas. Oncogene. 2008, 27: 803-810. 10.1038/sj.onc.1210675View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mulero-Navarro S, Esteller M: Chromatin remodeling factor CHD5 is silenced by promoter CpG island hypermethylation in human cancer. Epigenetics. 2008, 3: 210-215. 10.4161/epi.3.4.6610View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Marfella CG, Imbalzano AN: The Chd family of chromatin remodelers. Mutat Res. 2007, 618: 30-40. 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2006.07.012PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schuster EF, Stöger R: CHD5 defines a new subfamily of chromodomain-SWI2/SNF2-like helicases. Mammalian Genome. 2002, 13: 117-119. 10.1007/s00335-001-3042-6View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Thompson PM, Gotoh T, Kok M, White PS, Brodeur GM: CHD5, a new member of the chromodomain gene family, is preferentially expressed in the nervous system. Oncogene. 2003, 22: 1002-1011. 10.1038/sj.onc.1206211View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brodeur GM, Pritchard J, Berthold F, Carlsen NL, Castel V, Castelberry RP, De Bernardi B, Evans AE, Favrot M, Hedborg F: Revision of the International criteria for neuroblastoma diagnosis, staging and response to treatment. J Clin Oncol. 1993, 11: 1466-1477.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lavarino C, Garcia I, Mackintosh C, Cheung NKV, Domenech G, Ríos J, Perez N, Rodríguez E, De Torres C, Gerald WL, Tuset E, Acosta S, Beleta H, de Alava E, Mora J: Differential expression of genes mapping to recurrently abnormal chromosomal regions characterize neuroblastic tumours with distinct ploidy status. BMC Med Genomics. 2008, 1: 36- 10.1186/1755-8794-1-36PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Anderson SA, Kaznowski CE, Horn C, Rubenstein JL, McConnell SK: Distinct origins of neocortical projection neurons and interneurons in vivo. Cereb Cortex. 2002, 12: 702-709. 10.1093/cercor/12.7.702View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hevner RF, Daza RA, Rubenstein JL, Stunnenberg H, Olavarria JF, Englund C: Beyond laminar fate: toward a molecular classification of cortical projection/pyramidal neurons. Dev Neurosci. 2003, 25: 139-151. 10.1159/000072263View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gilbertson RJ, Ellison DW: The origins of medulloblastoma subtypes. Annu Rev Pathol. 2008, 3: 341-365. 10.1146/annurev.pathmechdis.3.121806.151518View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Barbashina V, Salazar P, Holland EC, Rosenblum MK, Ladanyi M: Allelic losses at 1p36 and 19q13 in gliomas: correlation with histologic classification, definition of a 150-kb minimal deleted region on 1p36, and evaluation of CAMTA1 as a candidate tumor suppressor gene. Clin Cancer Res. 2005, 11: 1119-1128.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- de Preter K, Vandesompele J, Heimann P, Yigit N, Beckman S, Schramm A, Eggert A, Stallings RL, Benoit Y, Renard M, De Paepe A, Laureys G, Påhlman S, Speleman F: Human fetal neuroblast and neuroblastoma transcriptome analysis confirms neuroblast origin and highlights neuroblastoma candidate genes. Genome Biol. 2006, 7 (9): R84- 10.1186/gb-2006-7-9-r84PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lavarino C, Cheung NK, Garcia I, Domenech G, de Torres C, Alaminos M, Rios J, Gerald WL, Kushner B, LaQuaglia M, Mora J: Specific gene expression profiles and chromosomal abnormalities are associated with infant disseminated neuroblastoma. BMC Cancer. 2009, 3: 9-44.Google Scholar
- Ambros PF, Ambros IM, Brodeur GM, Haber M, Khan J, Nakagawara A, Schleiermacher G, Speleman F, Spitz R, London WB, Cohn SL, Pearson AD, Maris JM: International consensus for neuroblastoma molecular diagnostics: report from the International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) Biology Committee. Br J Cancer. 2009, 100: 1471-1482. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605014PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shimada H, Ambros IM, Dehner LP, Hata J, Joshi VV, Roald B, Stram DO, Gerbing RB, Lukens JN, Matthay KK, Castleberry RP: The International Neuroblastoma Pathology Classification (the Shimada system). Cancer. 1999, 86: 364-72. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19990715)86:2<364::AID-CNCR21>3.0.CO;2-7View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Oberthuer A, Berthold F, Warnat P, Hero B, Kahlert Y, Spitz R, Ernestus K, König R, Haas S, Eils R, Schwab M, Brors B, Westermann F, Fischer M: Customized oligonucleotide microarray gene expression-based classification of neuroblastoma patients outperforms current clinical risk stratification. J Clin Oncol. 2006, 24 (31): 5070-5078. 10.1200/JCO.2006.06.1879View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- De Preter K, Vermeulen J, Brors B, Delattre O, Eggert A, Fischer M, Janoueix-Lerosey I, Lavarino C, Maris JM, Mora J, Nakagawara A, Oberthuer A, Ohira M, Schleiermacher G, Schramm A, Schulte JH, Wang Q, Westermann F, Spleleman F, Vandesompele J: Accurate outcome prediction in neuroblastoma across independent data sets using a multigene signature. Clin Cancer Res. 2010, 16 (5): 1532-1541. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-2607View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Oberthuer A, Hero B, Berthold F, Juraeva D, Faldum A, Kahlert Y, Asgharzadeh S, Seeger R, Scaruffi P, Tonini GP, Janoueix-Lerosey I, Delattre O, Schleiermacher G, Vandesompele J, Vermeulen J, Speleman F, Noguera R, Piqueras M, Bénard J, Valent A, Avigad S, Yaniv I, Weber A, Christiansen H, Grundy RG, Schardt K, Schwab M, Eils R, Warnat P, Kaderali L, Simon T, Decarolis B, Theissen J, Westermann F, Brors B, Fischer M: Prognostic impact of gene expression-based classification of neuroblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 2010, 28 (21): 3506-15. 10.1200/JCO.2009.27.3367View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tomioka N, Oba S, Ohira M, Misra A, Fridlyand J, Ishii S, Nakamura Y, Isogai E, Hirata T, Yoshida Y, Todo S, Kaneko Y, Albertson DG, Pinkel D, Feuerstein BG, Nakagawara A: Novel risk stratification of patients with neuroblastoma by genomic signature, which is independent of molecular signature. Oncogene. 2008, 27: 441-449. 10.1038/sj.onc.1210661View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nakagawara A, Arima-Nakagawara M, Scavarda NJ, Azar CG, Cantor AB, Brodeur GM: Association between high levels of expression of the TRK gene and favorable outcome in humana neuroblastoma. N Engl J Med. 1993, 328: 847-854. 10.1056/NEJM199303253281205View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brodeur GM, Minturn JE, Ho R, Simpson AM, Iyer R, Varela CR, Light JE, Kolla V, Evans AE: Trk receptor and inhibition in neuroblastomas. Clin Can Res. 2009, 15 (10): 3244-3250. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-1815.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Berwanger B, Hartmann O, Bergmann E, Bernard S, Nielsen D, Krause M, Kartal A, Flynn D, Wiedemeyer R, Schwab M, Schäfer H, Christiansen H, Eilers M: Loss of a FYN-regulated differentiation and growth arrest pathway in advanced stage neuroblastomas. Cancer Cell. 2002, 2 (5): 377-86. 10.1016/S1535-6108(02)00179-4View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Oberthuer A, Hero B, Spitz R, Berthold F, Fischer M: The tumor-associated antigen PRAME is universally expressed in high-stage neuroblastoma and associated with poor outcome. Clin Can Res. 2004, 10 (13): 4307-13. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-03-0813.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Huang S, Laoukili J, Epping MT, Koster J, Hölzel M, Westerman BA, Nijkamp W, Hata A, Asgharzadeh S, Seeger RC, Versteg R, Beijersbergen RL, Bernards R: ZNF423 is critically required for retinoic acid-induced differentiation and is a marker of neuroblastomas outcome. Cancer Cell. 2009, 15: 328-340. 10.1016/j.ccr.2009.02.023PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nakagawara A, Arima M, Azar CG, Scavarda NJ, Brodeur GM: Inverse relationship between trk expression and N-myc amplification in humana neuroblastomas. Cancer Res. 1992, 52: 1364-1368.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tanaka T, Hiyama E, Sugimoto T, Sawada T, Tanabe M, Ida N: trkA gene expression in neuroblastoma. Can Res. 1995, 76: 1086-1095.Google Scholar
- Tanaka T, Sugimoto T, Sawada T: Prognostic discrimination among neuroblastomas according to Ha-ras/trk A gene expression. Can Res. 1998, 83: 1626-1633.Google Scholar
- Krammer K. Gerald W, LeSauteur L, Saragovi HU, Cheung N-KV: Prognostic value of TrkA protein detection by monoclonal antibody 5C3 in neuroblastoma. Clin Can Res. 1996, 2: 1361-67.Google Scholar
- Krammer K. Gerald W, LeSauteur L, Saragovi HU, Cheung N-KV: Monoclonal antibody to human Trk-A: Diagnostic and therapeutic potential in neuroblastoma. Eur J Cancer. 33 (12): 2090-2091.Google Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.