miR-29b defines the pro-/anti-proliferative effects of S100A7 in breast cancer
- Helong Zhao†1,
- Tasha Wilkie†1,
- Yadwinder Deol1,
- Amita Sneh1,
- Akaansha Ganju1,
- Mustafa Basree1,
- Mohd W Nasser1Email author and
- Ramesh K Ganju1Email author
© Zhao et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2016
Received: 7 October 2014
Accepted: 22 December 2014
Published: 27 January 2015
The Erratum to this article has been published in Molecular Cancer 2015 14:195
S100A7 (Psoriasin) is an inflammatory protein known to be upregulated in breast cancer. However, the role of S100A7 in breast cancer has been elusive, since both pro- and anti-proliferative roles have been reported in different types of breast cancer cells and animal models. To date, the mechanism by which S100A7 differentially regulates breast cancer cell proliferation is still not clear.
We used Gene Functional Enrichment Analysis to search for the determining factor of S100A7 differential regulation. We confirmed the factor and elaborated its regulating mechanism using in vitro cell culture. We further verified the findings using xenografts of human breast cancer cells in nude mice.
In the present study, we show that S100A7 significantly upregulates the expression of miR-29b in Estrogen Receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer cells (represented by MCF7), and significantly downregulates miR-29b in ER-negative cells (represented by MDA-MB-231). The differential regulation of miR-29b by S100A7 in ER-positive and ER-negative breast cancer is supported by the gene expression analysis of TCGA invasive breast cancer dataset. miR-29b transcription is inhibited by NF-κB, and NF-κB activation is differentially regulated by S100A7 in ER-positive and ER-negative breast cancer cells. This further leads to differential regulation of PI3K p85α and CDC42 expression, p53 activation and p53-associated anti-proliferative pathways. Reversing the S100A7-caused changes of miR-29b expression by transfecting exogenous miR-29b or miR-29b-Decoy can inhibit the effects of S100A7 on in vitro cell proliferation and tumor growth in nude mice.
The distinct modulations of the NF-κB – miR-29b – p53 pathway make S100A7 an oncogene in ER-negative and a cancer-suppressing gene in ER-positive breast cancer cells, with miR-29b being the determining regulatory factor.
KeywordsBreast cancer Cell proliferation S100A7 miR-29b p53
The inflammatory protein S100A7 (Psoriasin) was discovered as a marker of human psoriasis lesion [1,2]. S100A7 is mainly expressed in epithelial cells , and can be induced by pathogens and inflammatory cytokines [3,4]. It has been noticed that S100A7 is upregulated in breast cancer cells [5-7]. However, the role of S100A7 in breast cancer progression has been elusive, since both pro- and anti-proliferative roles have been reported in different types of breast cancer cells and animal models [8-11]. It has been shown that S100A7 promotes cancer growth and metastasis in basal-like (ER−) breast cancer cells [10,12]. Accordingly, S100A7 upregulation correlates with poor prognosis for patients with basal subtype breast carcinoma . Conversely, it inhibits cancer growth and cell migration in luminal (ER+) breast cancer cells . To date, the mechanism by which S100A7 differentially regulates ER− and ER+ breast cancer cell proliferation is unknown.
microRNAs bind to untranslated regions (UTRs) of mRNAs, which inhibits protein translation and/or degrades mRNAs . miR-29b is considered to be a tumor suppressor in multiple types of cancers [14,15], including breast cancer [16,17]. The anti-cancer effect of miR-29b has been shown to be related to its targeting of the 3′ UTRs of multiple key cancer regulators, thus suppressing the growth and metastasis of breast cancer. miR-29b is encoded by two genes, mir-29b-1 on chromosome 7 and mir-29b-2 on chromosome 1. It has been shown that NF-κB binds to the promoter of mir-29b-1 and inhibits its transcription . In addition, NF-κB has been shown to transactivate YY1, which then binds to the promoter of mir-29b-2 and inhibits its transcription . Since NF-κB governs numerous survival genes and apoptotic genes, its functions in cancer development has long been noted. The activity of NF-κB can be either upregulated or downregulated in cancer cells, depending on whether it is inducing survival signaling or apoptotic signaling . The differential activation statuses of NF-κB in different breast cancer subtypes has led to the discovery of reciprocal regulation of NF-κB by ER .
Among the targets of miR-29b, PI3K p85α and CDC42 have been shown to regulate p53 activation . Activated p53 translocates into the nucleus and activates multiple anti-proliferative pathways, including the ones of DNA repair and mitosis check point . It was shown that miR-29b targets p85α and CDC42 and consequently inhibits p53 activation and cell proliferation .
In the present study, we described a novel role of the NF-κB – miR-29b – p53 pathway, which defines the distinct effects of S100A7 on regulating cell proliferation and tumor growth of ER− and ER+ breast cancer.
S100A7 differentially regulates proliferation of ER− and ER+ breast cancer cells
Differential effects of S100A7 overexpression in human breast cancer cell lines
Proliferation change with S100A7 overexpression
Morphology change with S100A7 overexpression
Tumor growth with S100A7 overexpression
S100A7 overexpression induced differential miR-29b expression changes in MDA-MB-231 and MCF7 cells
S100A7 differentially modulates NF-κB activation in MDA-MB-231 and MCF7
Interestingly, we observed differential regulation of NF-κB activity by S100A7, which is similar to the differential regulation of miR-29b expression in MDA-MB-231 and MCF7 cells. Using both κB-site-DNA-bait ELISA and NF-κB-luciferase reporter assay, we observed an increase of NF-κB activity in MDA-MB-231 and a decrease of NF-κB activity in MCF7 after S100A7 overexpression (Figure 1D, E). κB-site-DNA-bait ELISA detected the overall activated p65 NF-κB level, and NF-κB-luciferase reporter assay detected the actual transcription driving NF-κB level. Similar to changes in NF-κB activation level, we also observed increased NF-κB nuclear translocation in MDA-MB-231 and decreased NF-κB nuclear translocation in MCF7 after S100A7 overexpression (Figure 1F, G).
miR-29b transcription is differentially regulated by S100A7 via NF-κB in MDA-MB-231 and MCF7
S100A7 downregulates PI3K p85α and CDC42 via targeting of miR-29b to activate and stabilize p53 in MCF7
S100A7 enhances p53 related anti-proliferative pathways in MCF7
S100A7 induced differential regulation of miR-29b is important for its differential effects on cell proliferation of MDA-MB-231 and MCF7 in vitro and their tumor growth in vivo
miR-29b governs numerous genes’ expression by targeting their 3′ UTRs, leading to both translational suppression and instability of mRNAs. Since large portions of these regulated genes are associated with cell proliferation, miR-29b has been considered as a tumor suppressor in various cancers [14,15,19,27], including breast cancer [16,17]. Moreover, other than regulation of cell proliferation, miR-29b has also been shown to inhibit breast cancer metastasis . Through bioinformatic analysis and in vitro assays, we found that miR-29b expression was reduced by S100A7 in ER− MDA-MB-231 and increased by S100A7 in ER+ MCF7 cells, which at least partly explained the different roles of S100A7 in regulating proliferation of different types of breast cancer cells. The clinical relevance of this was supported by patient data of the TCGA cohort, which showed that S100A7 upregulation is more likely to be associated with increased miR-29b expression in ER+ breast cancer patients than ER− patients and vice versa. Interestingly, we noticed that, although S100A7 is overexpressed in both ER− and ER+ breast cancer patients, there is a significant mutual-exclusivity of S100A7 and ER expression in human breast tumors (Additional file 1: Figures S1–S2). In other words, S100A7 overexpression is more commonly seen in ER− tumors. This is in agreement with previous works based on different cohorts of breast cancer patients .
Moreover, the differential regulation of miR-29b expression was associated with differential regulation of NF-κB activation by S100A7. NF-κB has been shown to either directly or indirectly inhibit the expression of miR-29b, which is transcribed from mir-29b-1 on chromosome 7 and mir-29b-2 on chromosome 1 [18,19]. Directly, NF-κB can bind to the promoter of mir-29b-1 to block its transcription. Indirectly, NF-κB can transactivate YY1 which then block the transcription of mir-29b-2 by binding to its promoter . In the present study, we showed that S100A7 enhanced NF-κB activity in MDA-MB-231 and inhibited NF-κB activity in MCF7, which then directly and/or indirectly influences miR-29b transcription. It was known that ER negatively regulates activity in breast cancer [21,28-30], and may even block the transcriptional function of NF-κB . Thus, the absence/presence of ER in breast cancer cells may lead to the differential regulations of NF-κB activation by S100A7 in MDA-MB-231 (ER−) and MCF7 (ER+) cells. In this work, ER status was used as the primary standard for dividing breast cancer cells into two groups with distinct responses to S100A7. To our knowledge, the distinct regulation of NF- κB - miR-29b by S100A7 is shown for the first time.
Among the targets of miR-29b, PI3K p85α and CDC42 have been shown to be closely related to cancer growth [22,31,32]. And, as oncogenes, they inhibit the activation of tumor suppressor, p53 . Activated p53 translocates into the nucleus and avoids degradation in the cytoplasm. Using MCF7, whose miR-29b was more significantly affected by S100A7, we showed that miR-29b targeted PI3K p85α and CDC42, which consequently increased p53 level by enhancing its activation and nuclear translocation.
Activated p53 can enhance multiple anti-proliferative pathways to inhibit cancer growth . Here, we showed that increased p53 activation and total protein level increased the expression of multiple p53 downstream anti-proliferative factors, including mitosis checkpoint pathways and DNA repair pathways. These effects were considered to exert anti-proliferative influences to breast cancer cells.
In addition, we reversed the effects of S100A7 on cell proliferation and tumor growth by overexpressing miR-29b in 231-S100A7 cells and knocking down miR-29b in MCF7-S100A7 cells, which reflected that miR-29b is not only sufficient but also necessary for determining the differential effects of S100A7 in breast cancer cells. This demonstrated that miR-29b functions downstream of S100A7 and is important in determining the differential effects of S100A7 in breast cancer cells.
In conclusion, we report a novel regulatory route that determines the pro-/anti-proliferative roles of S100A7 in ER− and ER+ breast cancer. In these different types of breast cancer cells, S100A7 differentially regulates NF-κB activation, which then differentially affects miR-29b expression and p53 functions. And reversing miR-29b changes can suppress the effects of S100A7 in these cells. Thus, it is suggested that miR-29b may be paired with S100A7 to serve as more accurate biomarkers for breast cancer diagnosis and prognosis. On the other hand, S100A7 does not have kinase activity, which makes it difficult to be targeted with drugs. Recently, many lipid-nanoparticle-based technologies have made it possible to target miRNAs in clinical trials of cancer treatment . Hence, with the discovery of S100A7 - miR-29b regulatory route, miR-29b may be potential to serve as an alternative target for S100A7 overexpression in breast cancer treatment.
Materials and methods
Reagents and cells
NF-κB p65, p53, PI3K p85α, CDC42, Oct1, β-actin and GAPDH antibodies and NF-κB inhibitor QNZ were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). miR-29b real-time PCR assay kit and miR-29b inhibitor were purchased from Life Technologies (Carlsbad, CA). Luciferase substrate was purchased from Promega (Madison, WI). p-p53 (S15), p-ATR, p-Chk-1, p-Chk-2 antibodies were purchased from Cell Signaling Techology (Danvers, MA). S100A7 antibody was purchased from Novus Biologicals (Littleton, CO). MDA-MB-231 cell and its derivatives were cultured in DMEM medium supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% dual antibiotics. MCF7 cell and their derivatives were cultured in MEMα medium supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% dual antibiotics. p53-conditional-knockdown-MCF7 cell line was provided by Dr. Jill Bargonetti (The City University of New York). 231-S-miR-29b cell was generated by stably transfecting pcDNA3-miR29b plasmid shared by Dr. Joshua Mendell (Johns Hopkins University) . MCF7-S-miR-29b-Decoy cell was generated by stably transfecting AB.pCCL.sin.cPPT.U6.miR-29b-Decoy.hPGK.GFP.WPRE plasmid shared by Dr. Brian Brown (Mount Sinai School of Medicine) .
Adult female nude mice (NU/NU), obtained from Charles River Laboratories (Wilmington, MA), were housed under specific pathogen-free conditions. MDA-MB-231, MCF7 or their derivatives (3×106 cells/200 μL PBS) were injected into the right mammary fat pad of each mouse. Mice with MCF7 cell or derivatives were also injected subcutaneously with 2.5 μg of β-estradiol 17-valerate in 50 μL of Sesame oil once a week. Tumor size was assessed once a week and tumor volume was calculated using digital calipers according to the formula: volume = length × (width)2 / 2. Mice were sacrificed at the end of study or per the request of the veterinarian. All mice were kept in OSU’s animal facility in compliance with the guidelines and protocols approved by the IACUC.
Gene functional enrichment analysis
Gene functional enrichment (GFE) analysis is performed using the bioinformatics engine, ToppGene , developed by the Division of Biomedical Informatics, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center (Cincinnati, OH). Training gene list was determined by gating the significantly up-/down-regulated genes from microarray data as specified. Enrichment analysis was corrected by Bonferroni method with a p-Value cutoff of 0.05.
Quantitative reverse transcription–PCR (qRT-PCR)
qRT-PCR was performed as previously described . Briefly, total RNA was extracted from cells using TRIzol reagent (Life Technologies) and purified with RNeasy kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). For mRNA detection, total RNA was then reverse transcribed into cDNA using High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Life Technologies) and quantified using Power SYBR Green Master Mix (Life Technologies). p53 pathway PCR array was performed using p53 Signaling Pathway RT2 Profiler PCR Array from Qiagen. For miRNA detection, total RNA was reverse transcribed and miRNAs quantified using miRNA specific real-time PCR kits from Life Technologies. Real-time PCR was performed on Eppendorf Mastercycler realplex. Data analysis was performed using standard “delta delta Ct method”.
NF-κB activity assays
For the κB-site-DNA-bait ELISA assay, nuclear and cytoplasmic extractions of cells were prepared using NE-PER Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Extraction Reagents (Thermo Scientific) per the product manual. Activated NF-κB p65 levels of both nuclear and cytoplasmic extracts were measured using TransAM NF-κB p65 Transcription Factor ELISA Kit (Active Motif, Carlsbad, CA) per the product manual. For the luciferase reporter assay, cells were transfected with equal amount of pNF-κB-Luc reporter plasmids by lipofectamine 2000 (Life Technologies) and harvested after 48 h. Cells were lysed and luciferase activity was measured with the luciferase assay kit from Promega (Madison, WI) and Synergy plate reader (BioTek, Winooski, VT) per the manufacturer’s manual.
Cells grown on micro-chamber-slides were fixed and permeabilized using the Fix/Perm solution (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) for 20 min at 4°C. The cells were washed with BD Perm/Wash buffer (BD Biosciences), and stained with respective primary antibodies for 1 h at 4°C. After the incubation, cells were washed and stained with Alexa Fluor 488 or 568 secondary antibodies for 1 h at 4°C. The slides were mounted using Vectashield mounting medium with DAPI (Vector Laboratories) and then imaged with Olympus FV1000 confocal microscope. The pictures were processed using Olympus FV-10 ASW software.
Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP)
Cells were fixed and cross-linked in 2% paraformaldehyde, and then cross-linking was quenched with 10% volume of 1.375 M glycine. After washing with ice cold PBS, cells were harvested and lysed with NP-40 ChIP buffer. Nuclei were isolated by centrifuge, and lysed with SDS nuclei lysis buffer. DNA was digested using Micrococcal Nuclease from New England Biolabs, and digestion was stopped by adding 50 mM EDTA. DNA samples were then immunoprecipitated overnight at 4°C with NF-κB p65 antibody and Protein G/Protein A Agarose Beads (Calbiochem). After washing, DNA was eluted using SDS elution buffer, and then reverse cross-linked by incubation overnight at 65°C. DNA was purified using TRIzol reagent (Life Technologies) and chloroform, and then subjected to PCR with specific primers.
Cell proliferation assay
Cell proliferation assay was performed using Cell Proliferation Kit I (MTT) from Roche (Indianapolis, IN) per the kit manual. Proliferation assays were done in triplicates. O.D. values were measured using Model 680 microplate reader from BIO-RAD (Hercules, CA).
Western blotting (WB)
WB was performed as previously described . Briefly, proteins in cell lysates were separated by electrophoresis using NuPAGE SDS PAGE Gel (Life Technologies). Proteins transferred onto Nitrocellulose membrane were then blotted by specific primary and HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies. Protein expression was detected by Thermo ECL reagents using X-ray films.
Reported data for cell line studies are the means ± S.E.M. of at least three independent experiments performed in duplicates or triplicates. Animal studies use n = 5 ~ 8 mice for each group. The statistical significance was determined by the Student’s t test or as specified.
The authors would like to thank Dr. Hasan Mukhtar (University of Wisconsin) for providing the NF-κB luciferase reporter plasmid, thank Dr. Jill Bargonetti (The City University of New York) for providing the p53 CKD MCF7 cell line, thank Dr. Joshua Mendell (Johns Hopkins University) and Dr. Brian Brown (Mount Sinai School of Medicine) for sharing their miR-29b plasmids, thank the Division of Biomedical Informatics Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center for providing their bioinformatic engine “ToppGene”, thank Grace Amponsah for experimental assistance. This work is supported in part by NCI R01 CA153490, CA109527 and Pelotonia research fund to RKG and Pelotonia Fellowship to HZ and YD.
- Jinquan T, Vorum H, Larsen CG, Madsen P, Rasmussen HH, Gesser B, et al. Psoriasin: a novel chemotactic protein. J Invest Dermatol. 1996;107:5–10.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Eckert RL, Broome AM, Ruse M, Robinson N, Ryan D, Lee K. S100 proteins in the epidermis. J Invest Dermatol. 2004;123:23–33.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Glaser R, Harder J, Lange H, Bartels J, Christophers E, Schroder JM. Antimicrobial psoriasin (S100A7) protects human skin from Escherichia coli infection. Nat Immunol. 2005;6:57–64.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- West NR, Watson PH. S100A7 (psoriasin) is induced by the proinflammatory cytokines oncostatin-M and interleukin-6 in human breast cancer. Oncogene. 2010;29:2083–92.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Al-Haddad S, Zhang Z, Leygue E, Snell L, Huang A, Niu Y, et al. Psoriasin (S100A7) expression and invasive breast cancer. Am J Pathol. 1999;155:2057–66.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Carlsson H, Petersson S, Enerback C. Cluster analysis of S100 gene expression and genes correlating to psoriasin (S100A7) expression at different stages of breast cancer development. Int J Oncol. 2005;27:1473–81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Enerback C, Porter DA, Seth P, Sgroi D, Gaudet J, Weremowicz S, et al. Psoriasin expression in mammary epithelial cells in vitro and in vivo. Cancer Res. 2002;62:43–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Deol YS, Nasser MW, Yu L, Zou X, Ganju RK. Tumor-suppressive effects of psoriasin (S100A7) are mediated through the beta-catenin/T cell factor 4 protein pathway in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer cells. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:44845–54.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Emberley ED, Niu Y, Njue C, Kliewer EV, Murphy LC, Watson PH. Psoriasin (S100A7) expression is associated with poor outcome in estrogen receptor-negative invasive breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2003;9:2627–31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nasser MW, Qamri Z, Deol YS, Ravi J, Powell CA, Trikha P, et al. S100A7 enhances mammary tumorigenesis through upregulation of inflammatory pathways. Cancer Res. 2012;72:604–15.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Krop I, März A, Carlsson H, Li X, Bloushtain-Qimron N, Hu M, et al. A putative role for psoriasin in breast tumor progression. Cancer Res. 2005;65:11326–34.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Emberley ED, Niu Y, Leygue E, Tomes L, Gietz RD, Murphy LC, et al. Psoriasin interacts with Jab1 and influences breast cancer progression. Cancer Res. 2003;63:1954–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ambros V. The functions of animal microRNAs. Nature. 2004;431:350–5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Garzon R, Heaphy CE, Havelange V, Fabbri M, Volinia S, Tsao T, et al. MicroRNA 29b functions in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2009;114:5331–41.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Xiong Y, Fang JH, Yun JP, Yang J, Zhang Y, Jia WH, et al. Effects of microRNA-29 on apoptosis, tumorigenicity, and prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2010;51:836–45.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chou J, Lin JH, Brenot A, Kim JW, Provot S, Werb Z. GATA3 suppresses metastasis and modulates the tumour microenvironment by regulating microRNA-29b expression. Nat Cell Biol. 2013;15:201–13.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wu Z, Huang X, Zou Q, Guo Y. The inhibitory role of Mir-29 in growth of breast cancer cells. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2013;32:98.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mott JL, Kurita S, Cazanave SC, Bronk SF, Werneburg NW, Fernandez-Zapico ME. Transcriptional suppression of mir-29b-1/mir-29a promoter by c-Myc, hedgehog, and NF-kappaB. J Cell Biochem. 2010;110:1155–64.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang H, Garzon R, Sun H, Ladner KJ, Singh R, Dahlman J, et al. NF-kappaB-YY1-miR-29 regulatory circuitry in skeletal myogenesis and rhabdomyosarcoma. Cancer Cell. 2008;14:369–81.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Baud V, Karin M. Is NF-kappaB a good target for cancer therapy? Hopes and pitfalls. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2009;8:33–40.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sas L, Lardon F, Vermeulen PB, Hauspy J, Van Dam P, Pauwels P, et al. The interaction between ER and NFκB in resistance to endocrine therapy. Breast Cancer Res. 2012;14:212.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Park SY, Lee JH, Ha M, Nam JW, Kim VN. miR-29 miRNAs activate p53 by targeting p85 alpha and CDC42. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2009;16:23–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vousden KH, Lu X. Live or let die: the cell’s response to p53. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002;2:594–604.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Network CGA. Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature. 2012;490:61–70.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ma F, Xu S, Liu X, Zhang Q, Xu X, Liu M, et al. The microRNA miR-29 controls innate and adaptive immune responses to intracellular bacterial infection by targeting interferon-gamma. Nat Immunol. 2011;12:861–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Brekman A, Singh KE, Polotskaia A, Kundu N, Bargonetti J. A p53-independent role of Mdm2 in estrogen-mediated activation of breast cancer cell proliferation. Breast Cancer Res. 2011;13:R3.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Balkhi MY, Iwenofu OH, Bakkar N, Ladner KJ, Chandler DS, Houghton PJ, et al. miR-29 acts as a decoy in sarcomas to protect the tumor suppressor A20 mRNA from degradation by HuR. Sci Signal. 2013;6:ra63.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Biswas DK, Cruz AP, Gansberger E, Pardee AB. Epidermal growth factor-induced nuclear factor kappa B activation: a major pathway of cell-cycle progression in estrogen-receptor negative breast cancer cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:8542–7.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Parker JS, Mullins M, Cheang MC, Leung S, Voduc D, Vickery T, et al. Supervised risk predictor of breast cancer based on intrinsic subtypes. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:1160–7.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cvoro A, Tzagarakis-Foster C, Tatomer D, Paruthiyil S, Fox MS, Leitman DC. Distinct roles of unliganded and liganded estrogen receptors in transcriptional repression. Mol Cell. 2006;21:555–64.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lang N, Liu M, Tang QL, Chen X, Liu Z, Bi F. Effects of microRNA-29 family members on proliferation and invasion of gastric cancer cell lines. Chin J Cancer. 2010;29:603–10.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Namløs HM, Meza-Zepeda LA, Barøy T, Østensen IH, Kresse SH, Kuijjer ML, et al. Modulation of the osteosarcoma expression phenotype by microRNAs. PLoS One. 2012;7:e48086.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kanasty R, Dorkin JR, Vegas A, Anderson D. Delivery materials for siRNA therapeutics. Nat Mater. 2013;12:967–77.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hwang HW, Wentzel EA, Mendell JT. A hexanucleotide element directs microRNA nuclear import. Science. 2007;315:97–100.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mullokandov G, Baccarini A, Ruzo A, Jayaprakash AD, Tung N, Israelow B, et al. High-throughput assessment of microRNA activity and function using microRNA sensor and decoy libraries. Nat Methods. 2012;9:840–6.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chen J, Bardes EE, Aronow BJ, Jegga AG. ToppGene Suite for gene list enrichment analysis and candidate gene prioritization. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37:W305–11.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Anand AR, Zhao H, Nagaraja T, Robinson LA, Ganju RK. N-terminal Slit2 inhibits HIV-1 replication by regulating the actin cytoskeleton. Retrovirology. 2013;10:2.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.