Skip to main content


We're creating a new version of this page. See preview

  • Review
  • Open Access

Circular RNAs function as ceRNAs to regulate and control human cancer progression

  • 1, 2,
  • 1, 2,
  • 1, 2,
  • 1, 2,
  • 2,
  • 1,
  • 1, 2,
  • 1, 2,
  • 1, 2,
  • 1, 2,
  • 2,
  • 2,
  • 2,
  • 2, 3,
  • 2, 4,
  • 2, 3,
  • 1, 2, 3Email author and
  • 1, 2, 3Email author
Contributed equally
Molecular Cancer201817:79

  • Received: 5 December 2017
  • Accepted: 26 March 2018
  • Published:


Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are connected at the 3′ and 5′ ends by exon or intron cyclization, forming a complete ring structure. circRNA is more stable and conservative than linear RNA and abounds in various organisms. In recent years, increasing numbers of reports have found that circRNA plays a major role in the biological functions of a network of competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA). circRNAs can compete together with microRNAs (miRNAs) to influence the stability of target RNAs or their translation, thus, regulating gene expression at the transcriptional level. circRNAs are involved in biological processes such as tumor cell proliferation, apoptosis, invasion, and migration as ceRNAs. circRNAs, therefore, represent promising candidates for clinical diagnosis and treatment. Here, we review the progress in studying the role of circRNAs as ceRNAs in tumors and highlight the participation of circRNAs in signal transduction pathways to regulate cellular functions.


  • Circular RNAs
  • ceRNA
  • Cancer
  • Gene expression regulation


In 1976, researchers identified circular RNA (circRNA) in RNA viruses [1]. Then, in 1979, Hus [2] observed ring molecules, which are formed through the linkage of the 3′ and 5′ ends with a covalent bond, in HeLa cells under a microscope. However, these circRNAs without a characteristic tail were usually ignored during the separation process when using traditional RNA sequencing methods; thus, circRNAs were neglected until 1993, when their presence was confirmed in the human body [3]. Then, following improvements in experimental methods, the role of circRNA became increasingly clearer. circRNAs have features such as stability, sequence conservation, and expression specificity and exist in many cells [4]. Although many types of circRNAs have been discovered, their functions are still unclear. Two papers that elucidated the function of circRNA [2, 5] were published in 2013. Afterward, the field of circRNA research boomed. Recently, many studies have shown that circRNAs are critical in many diseases, especially in the progression of human cancer.

The ceRNA (competing endogenous RNA) hypothesis proposes a mechanism whereby various types of RNA control gene expression at the posttranscriptional level, which implies that mRNAs, the transcripts of pseudogenes, long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) [610], and circRNAs [11] affect the stability or the translation of target RNAs by competitively binding to the same microRNA (miRNA) [1214].

circRNA, which plays a role in biological regulation primarily via gene regulation, is a type of non-coding RNA. circRNAs have extremely abundant binding sites for microRNAs (miRNA) and thus acts via absorption of miRNAs like a sponge [15]. circRNA can also act on other RNAs by base pairing [16]. In addition, circRNA can inhibit the activity of proteins by interacting with them [17]. Although circRNA represents a type of non-coding RNA, under certain conditions, it can act as a translation template for protein synthesis and produce functional proteins. Recently, studies have found that circRNAs can regulate the expression of host proteins, interact with RNA-binding proteins controlling transcription, play a role in transcriptional regulation in cis, and even regulate and control alternative splicing. However, most studies have shown that the ceRNA system represents the main means through which circRNA achieves its biological functions. This paper reviews the mechanism whereby circRNAs act as ceRNAs to control tumors.

circRNA acts as ceRNA

ceRNA mechanism

The ceRNA hypothesis, a previously unknown pattern of regulating gene expression, was formally proposed by Salmena et al. [18] in 2011. The hypothesis states that miRNAs can affect the stability and translation of RNAs at the posttranscriptional level by binding to target genes, and conversely that RNAs can also affect miRNAs. Different varieties of ceRNAs have been discovered, including mRNAs, the transcripts of pseudogenes, lncRNAs, and circRNAs. All contain miRNA response elements (MREs) [11, 1922]. circRNAs, as special endogenous non-coding RNAs, have become a new research focus among the ceRNA family after lncRNAs.

RNA transcripts that have the same MREs can competitively inhibit the function of miRNAs, acting as an RNA sponge to block and inhibit miRNAs from binding to their target sites [18]; in addition, an RNA that has the same MREs can competitively bind miRNAs (Fig. 1). Thus, RNA molecules can reciprocally influence each other’s expression via miRNAs, which results in mutual regulation. Furthermore, the more similar miRNA types shared between two RNAs [23], the stronger their competitive relationship.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

circRNAs serve as endogenous RNA competitors. A linear RNA precursor can be cis-spliced into linear RNA, and special sequences in the RNA precursor can combine to form a cycle to produce circRNAs. circRNAs act as endogenous RNA competitors to absorb microRNA (miRNA); as a result, the activity of the corresponding miRNA is reduced. miRNAs mainly act on mRNAs, and circRNA competition process blocks miRNAs from regulating the expression of target genes. This interaction between circRNAs and miRNAs has been shown to also occur in exosomes

Factors affecting ceRNA activity

Recent studies have found that the activity of ceRNA is decided by a series of factors, including the abundance of miRNAs/ceRNAs, RNA editing, changes in the RNA 3′ UTR and RNA binding proteins (RBPs) [24].

Mukherji [25] proposed a hypothesis known as the “target threshold effect”: when the abundance of miRNAs and ceRNAs is nearly equal, the activity of ceRNAs is optimal. When the total level of transcription far exceeds miRNA levels, the role of ceRNA is substantially reduced because the amount of available miRNA is limited. Conversely, when the amount of miRNA is much higher than that of ceRNA, interactions are unlikely to occur because most transcripts are completely inhibited [25, 26]. Kumar et al. [27, 28] further demonstrated that the optimal ceRNA interactions occur when the levels of ceRNAs and miRNAs are similar.

RNA editing is a posttranscriptional gene regulation mechanism [29] that changes the genetic information in mRNA through the insertion, deletion, and substitution of nucleotides. Recent studies have shown that RNA editing affects the ceRNA system mainly in two ways. miRNA editing may affect the biosynthesis process, thus affecting the stability of the RNA molecules and even changing their roles and targets [30]. In addition, the editing of downstream RNA molecules may eliminate or produce a new miRNA binding site.

miRNAs mainly act on the 3′ UTRs of mRNAs and engage in mutual regulation. Therefore, a change in the 3′ UTR of an mRNA molecule will affect the ceRNA system. Mayer [31] found that compared with normal cells, cancer cells express higher amounts of mRNA subtypes with shorter 3′ UTRs. For transcripts with shorter 3′ UTRs, the number of miRNAs directly targeting these UTRs will decrease, and their ability to regulate other transcripts as ceRNA will be reduced [32]. Transcripts with short 3′ UTRs show greater stability and usually encode more proteins, as some miRNA binding sites disappear in transcripts with short 3′ UTR [31].

RBPs interact with RNA molecules and affect their splicing, stability, localization, and translation. In addition to competing with miRNAs, RNAs can compete with RBPs. The two regulatory processes are not isolated but are intrinsically linked [26, 32]. RBPs can influence the interactions of ceRNAs by directly occupying RNA target sites or by altering the RNA secondary structure to influence its affinity for miRNAs [24].

In addition, the activity of ceRNAs also depends on the number of MREs contained in each cell [26] and the subcellular localization of ceRNAs [24]. Furthermore, the tissue, disease development and pathological environment also influence the activity of ceRNAs [24](Fig. 1).

Exosomes are vesicles encased in a lipid bilayer that can be produced and released by almost all types of cells, including tumor cells. They can contain DNA, mRNA, miRNA, and transport proteins. Li et al. [20] first discovered circRNAs in MHCC-LM3 liver cancer cells and exosomes by RNA-seq. They measured the back-spliced ratio of circular RNA to linear RNA in the exosomes and determined that it was 6-fold higher than the number of cells, indicating that exosomes could be rich in cyclic RNA. In addition, the expression of circ-KLDHC 10 in the serum of patients with colorectal cancer is far higher than that in healthy people, suggesting that circRNAs in tumor exosomes may represent a marker for the clinical diagnosis of cancer.

Because circular RNAs have no open linear tail, they are insensitive to exonucleases and therefore are stably expressed in the cell. Thus, if their expression is not appropriately regulated, they may accumulate in cells. Exosome secretion may thus represent one of the mechanisms for the removal of circular RNAs.

In recent years, increasing evidence has demonstrated that the interactions among ceRNAs, miRNAs, and miRNAs that act downstream of target genes are closely linked to the development of tumors; therefore, this has become a focus in the field of cancer research.

CircRNAs function as ceRNAs in tumor signaling pathways

Recently, circRNA has been increasingly found to be involved in cellular signaling pathways, such as mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)/extracellular regulated protein kinase (ERK1/2), phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (AKT), and Wnt/β-catenin pathways [3336]. As a relatively upstream regulatory molecule, circRNA acts by releasing downstream molecules by competing with miRNA. Often, a circRNA can regulate several tumors with similar biological properties through competitive binding. To date, circRNA has been found to be involved in several biological processes related to tumor development, including proliferation, apoptosis, and invasion (Table 1).
Table 1

Circular RNAs function as ceRNAs to regulate and control human cancer progression

Circular RNA

Biological functions


Downstream pathways

Tumor types

The expression level



proliferation\invasion\ migration\biomarkers



colon cancer HCC/GC


[23, 24]



miR-7 /miR-214


lung cancer













cyclin D1

lung adenocarcinoma












miR-103a-3p /miR-107


bladder cancer














colon cancer





















breast cancer





miRNA-33b /miR-93


colon cancer


















Invasion/ migration


Notch1 mRNA





Invasion/ migration



bladder cancer




Invasion/ migration






circular RNA SRY

Invasion/ migration



bile duct




Invasion/ migration







clinical diagnosis biomarkers





CircRNA and the signaling pathways involved in cell proliferation

Near-limitless multiplication capacity is one of the important characteristics of tumor cells [37]. The regulation of cell proliferation is a complex and precise process driven by a variety of signals that cause the cell to divide and grow by regulating the cell cycle. Consequently, disorders affecting cell cycle regulation play an important role in the excessive proliferation of tumor cells [38]. Many studies have shown that circRNAs function as ceRNAs in the control of tumor proliferation.

Some circRNAs have been reported to affect epidermal growth factor (EGFR)/RAF1/MAPK signaling. MAPK/ERK, which participates in cell proliferation, can control mitosis by signal amplification [39]. CDR1as/ciRS-7, which acts as a competitive miR-7 sponge and inhibits its function, can release insulin growth factor 1 receptor (IGF-IR) and other molecules and affect the MAPK/ERK1/2 and PI3K/AKT intracellular signaling pathways [33, 40, 41]. As a result, CDR1as is involved in the development of colon cancer, gastric cancer, and hepatocellular carcinoma by controlling proliferation. Several studies have demonstrated that overexpression of CDR1as in tumor cell lines results in active tumor proliferation [16, 33, 40, 42, 43]. Similarly, cir-ITCH plays a similar role in lung cancer by competitively binding to miR-7 [36].

Some circRNAs can regulate cell proliferation by targeting key molecules involved in the regulation of the cell cycle. p21 is a negative regulator of the cell cycle and a member of the cyclin-dependent kinase 1 family (CDK1); in association with cyclin, cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) or cyclin-CDKs, p21 induces cell cycle arrest and blocks cell proliferation [44]. Furthermore, when the expression of circMTO1 in liver cancer cells is decreased, the bound miR-9 is released, resulting in decreased p21 gene expression and a significant increase in tumor proliferation [45]. CircRNAs are also involved in the positive regulation of the cell cycle. Hsa_circ_0013958 in lung adenocarcinoma can competitively bind miR-134 and upregulate cyclin D1, leading to an increase in cell proliferation [46]. CircRNA_100290 and circTCF25 can bind miR-29b and miR-103a-3p/miR-107, which results in increased levels of CDK6, thus increasing tumor proliferation [47, 48]. The E2F transcription factors control the cell cycle by regulating the genes required to cross the G1/S DNA synthetic gap. Due to the key role played by cell cycle anomalies in the proliferation of cancer, E2Fs are closely associated with tumor prevalence [49](Fig. 2). In addition, circPVT1 and hsa_circ_001569 compete endogenously by binding to target miRNAs and increase the levels of E2F2 and E2F5, thus, enhancing tumor proliferation [50, 51].
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

circRNAs function as ceRNAs in regulating tumor cell proliferation. The regulation of the cell cycle is an important part of cell proliferation. CDR1as, circMTO1, circRNA_100290, circTCF25, hsa_circ_0013968, circPVT1, and hsa_circ_001569 participate in the regulation of the cell cycle through related molecules, thus modulating cell proliferation. At the same time, signaling pathways such as Wnt/β-catenin and MAPK also play an important role in the proliferation of tumor cells; cir-ITCH and other circRNAs play a regulatory role in these signaling pathways

Some reports have found that circRNA can also regulate cell proliferation by regulating immune molecules. Qiupeng Zheng’s team at Fudan University found that overexpression of circCHIPK3 in liver cancer increased the expression of the interleukin 6 receptor (IL6R) by inhibiting the expression of miR-124, which resulted in tumor proliferation [52]. IL6R is bound by its IL-6 ligand and can activate downstream signaling pathways, such as MAPK, PI3K, and signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3), which promotes tumor cell proliferation [5355].

CircRNA can also regulate the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway, resulting in the proliferation of tumor cells. The Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway in turn regulates the pluripotency of cells during development and plays a role in the determination of cell fate [56].

Cir-ITCH increased ITCH levels by inhibiting miR-7 and miR-214, which inhibited the activity of disheveled segment polarity protein 2 (Dvl2). Because Dvl2 is an important activator of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway [57], this resulted in inhibition of the signaling pathway [36] (Fig. 2).

CircRNAs and apoptosis-associated signaling pathways

The loss of apoptosis is another important characteristic of tumors [37]. Recent studies have found that some circRNAs are involved in the regulation of apoptosis in tumor cells.

The Bcl-2 family of proteins plays a key role in the apoptotic pathway. The anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-2 is located in the outer membrane of the mitochondria and inhibits the release of apoptotic factors such as cytochrome C, thus inhibiting apoptosis [58]. Moreover, Bcl-2 may represent a target for miR-143 [59]. The endogenous circUBAP2 and hsa_circ_0001892 both compete to inhibit the activity of miR-143 and reduce apoptosis in myeloma and osteosarcoma cells [60, 61].Moreover, it has been reported that circCCDC66, which is overexpressed in lung adenocarcinoma, can inhibit tumor apoptosis by regulating the MYC oncogene. miRNA-33b and miR-93 could both regulate the MYC gene and promote apoptosis in tumors, whereas circCCDDC66 could inhibit this process by inhibiting both miRNAs [62] (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

circRNAs function as ceRNAs in the regulation of apoptosis in tumor cells. The expression of c-MYC affects apoptosis. One pathway consists of stabilizing p53 through ARF, whereas a second pathway involves a mechanism independent of the apoptotic pathway involving FasL and DNA damage [2]; the mechanism of kissing apoptosis involves the activation of the Bcl2-associated X protein (BAX), thereby promoting the release cytochrome C from mitochondria and triggering apoptosis. In this signaling pathway, circRNAs also function as ceRNAs. CircCCDC66 can promote apoptosis by inhibiting miR-93, thereby promoting the expression of c-MYC. However, circUBAP2 can control cancer by reducing Bcl-2 levels as a consequence of sequestering miR-143

Studies have shown that circ_0009910 acts as a sponge for miR-449a and promotes the expression of IL6R, which is the target of miR-449a. Moreover, circ_0009910 plays a role in inhibiting apoptosis in tumors [63]. Previous reports have indicated that IL6R may activate the STAT3 signaling pathway [64]. In a similar manner, circHIPK3 can also inhibit apoptosis by exerting an endogenous competitive effect and regulating the expression of IL6R [52] (Table 1).

CircRNAs as ceRNAs regulate the expression of GDNF family receptor alpha-1 (GFRA1) by regulating the levels of miR-34a, and they have an anti-apoptotic function in triple-negative breast cancer [65]. GFRA1 is a cell-surface receptor for glial cell-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF), which is reported to have an anti-apoptotic effect [59, 66] (Table 1).

CircRNAs are involved in invasion and migration as ceRNAs

Invasion and migration are indispensable characteristics of malignant tumors [37]. The epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is an important process regulating early invasion and migration in many tumors [67]. Wnt, TGFβ, and Notch ligands play key roles in EMT. Novel advances investigating the interplay between EMT and tumors have revealed several molecules, such as epidermal growth factor (FGF), insulin growth factor (IGF), and other hepatocyte growth factors (HGF) involved in EMT in tumors [68]. MiRNAs are involved in the regulation of EMT as non-coding RNAs [69]. As a sponge for miRNAs, circRNAs can also participate in the regulation of EMT through endogenous competition mechanisms, which can affect the invasion and migration of tumors (Table 1).

The highly expressed hsa_circ_0005986 was found to competitively bind miR-129-5p, resulting in decreased expression of Notch1 mRNA; this led to the inhibition of EMT with an accompanying anti-cancer effect [70]. However, low expression of hsa_circ_0005986 in liver cancer led to increased invasion and migration of the tumor cells. CDR1as exhibits a variety of regulatory functions, in addition to regulating the proliferation of tumor cells. For example, it can also promote tumor invasion and migration by inhibiting miR-7 and regulating EGFR and IGF-IR [33, 34, 41] (Fig. 4).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4

circRNAs function as ceRNAs in regulating tumor invasion and migration. circRNAs regulate the invasion and migration of multiple factors in tumor cells, including RhoC, Notch, VEGFA, IL6R, and HNF-1β. These factors all participate in stimulating PI3K, which can activate AKT. This can promote angiogenesis and the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. circRNAs function as ceRNAs in this regulation

VEGFA is an important angiogenic factor involved in EMT [71]. High expression of circRNA-MYLK in bladder cancer can increase the expression of VEGFA mRNA by binding miR-29a as an RNA sponge, leading to enhanced tumor cell migration [72]. In glioma, circ-TTBK2 can bind and inactivate miR-217, leading to activation of the PI3K/AKT and ERK pathways via HNF-1β, which has a miR-217 binding site in its 3′ UTR. This promotes the attack of glioma cells, resulting in a high degree of tumor malignancy [73]. Circular SRY is a specific circular transcript present in the testicles, and it is expressed from a male sex determination gene [74, 75].Circular SRY binds to miR-138 and inhibits its activity [2]. MiR-138 SRY regulates the Ras homolog gene family member C (RhoC) mRNA. Because the expression of RhoC is regulated bymiR-138, its translation increases, thus promoting the proliferation, migration, and invasion of cholangiocarcinoma cells [2, 76] (Fig. 4). Whether circular SRY can be used as a ceRNA to inhibit miR-138 and regulate RhoC needs further discussion. The formation of the tumor microenvironment is beneficial for tumor invasion. Caspase-1 can activate the pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1β and IL-18, and promote inflammation and the formation of the tumor microenvironment, thus potentially promoting tumor infiltration and metastasis [7779]. Circ-0016347 can competitively bind miR-214 and remove the inhibition of caspase-1 by miR-214, thus increasing caspase-1 levels. Therefore, through the regulation of circ-0016347, tumor invasion and metastasis are enhanced [80] (Table 1).

circRNA and exosomes

Exosomes are vesicles encased in a lipid bilayer that are produced and released by almost all types of cells, including tumor cells. They store DNA, mRNA, miRNAs, and transport proteins. Li et al. [81] first discovered circRNAs in MHCC-LM3 liver cancer cells and exosomes by RNA-seq. They measured the back-spliced ratio of circular RNA to linear RNA in the exosomes and determined that it was 6-fold higher than the number of cells, indicating that exosomes could be enriched in cancer [81].

Because circular RNAs have no open linear tail, they are insensitive to exonucleases and therefore are stably expressed in the cell [81, 82]. Thus, if their expression levels are not regulated, they may accumulate in cells. Exosome secretion may thus represent one of the mechanisms for the removal of circular RNAs. Another possibility is that circRNAs may regulate cell communication through exosomes in some cases [83]. ciRS-7 /CDR1, which can be used as a sponge for miR-7, is present in exosomes. miR-7 upregulation in cells is associated with significantly reduced CDR1 levels in exosomes. However, the CDR1 levels in cells change very little, suggesting that the role of circRNAs in exosomes may be to transferring miRNA between different cells [81, 83].

CircRNAs as novel biomarkers in cancer

In contrast to linear RNAs, the 3′ and 5′ ends of circRNAs are not exposed. Therefore, they are not sensitive to ribonucleases, such as exonucleases, and are more stable [84]. Some circRNAs are specific for certain tumors. CircRNA with high expression in cancer tissues of some cancer patients, such as hsa_circ_0013958, also have high levels in plasma [46]. This means that detection can be more convenient. Additionally, the use of RNA sequencing and qRT-PCR has made the detection of circRNAs faster and more convenient, making circRNAs easier to extract and detect than proteins. Therefore, circRNAs represent an ideal biomarker for the prognosis and diagnosis of cancer. Recent studies have found that the expression profiles of circRNAs are changed in a variety of cancers. One study examined the levels of circCCDC66 in nontumor tissues (N; n = 76), polyp tissues (P; n = 22) and tumor tissues (T; n = 131) in patients with colorectal cancer and found that the levels of circCCDC66 were significantly higher in cancer tissues, whereas the prognosis of patients who displayed higher expression of circCCDC66 was worse. An area under the curve analysis was then used to show that the circCCDC66 levels in 88 patients with colorectal cancer who had been randomly selected was higher than that in randomly selected normal subjects. This demonstrated that circCCDC66 is a good marker for the diagnosis and prognosis of colon cancer [62]. Moreover, the expression of hsa_circ_0005075 in hepatocellular carcinoma was elevated and closely linked to clinical features such as tumor size [85]. It was also observed that circPVT1 could be used as a prognostic marker for gastric cancer, as high expression of circPVT1 was correlated with a worse prognosis [50]. Due to the high expression of CDR1as in various cancers, the expression of CDR1as may not be an obvious specific marker for early cancer diagnosis. Using a follow-up survey, it was found that other circRNAs, such as circMTO1, hsa_circ_001395,circUBAP2, circCCDC66,circGFRA1, hsa_circ_0004277 and hsa_circ_0005986, are also valuable markers for cancer diagnosis and prognosis [45, 46, 60, 62, 65, 86](Table 1). CircRNAs are more stable in tissues, serum, and urine because of their characteristics. The development of high-throughput sequencing has removed the obstacles to identifying circRNAs. However, circRNAs have not been clinically used thus far. A complete and reliable standard for diagnostic or prognostic markers remains to be further explored. However, the advantages of circRNA as biomarkers are becoming increasingly clear, and they may provide a new generation of tumor molecular biomarkers.

The role of circRNA as a ceRNA in tumor immunity

Tumor cells have immunogenicity, but tumors can evade immune surveillance [37]. In fact, throughout the course of tumor development, tumor cells must overcome the barrier of internal and external immunity to become a tumor. Only when cancerous cells escape immune surveillance and overcome immune function through various immune evasion mechanisms can the tumor progress or kill the host. CircRNA has rich potential to regulate tumor immunity because of its innate characteristics [87].

It has been reported that circRNA can be used as ceRNA to help the tumor evade immune surveillance. Inflammation in the tumor microenvironment is closely related to tumor immunity. Therefore, the study of signal transduction pathways for tumor-related inflammation will help to reveal the relationship between immunity and tumor development [87, 88]. As we discussed earlier, circRNA can be used as ceRNA to participate in the expression of inflammatory mediators. CircHIPK3 inhibits the activity of mir-124 and promotes the expression of IL-6R by binding miR-124 [52]. Whether circHIPK3 can affect the tumor immune response by promoting IL-6R remains to be further explored. The aforementioned hsa_circ_0020397 binds to miR-138 to inhibit the activity of miR-138 and promotes the expression of miR-134, which in turn regulates molecules such as telomerase reverse transcriptase and PD-L1 in colorectal cancer cells [66]. As a result of the moderate or high expression of hsa_circ_0020397 in CRCC, PD-L1 is up-regulated and can interact with PD-1 to enable cancer immune escape [89]. A recent study indicated that circAmotl1 up-regulates Dnmt3a, which could lead to methylation of the miR-17 promoter and reduce the expression of miR-17-5p [87, 90]. Finally, STAT3 expression is increased and plays an important role in tumor-mediated immunosuppression [90].


With the rapid development of next-generation sequencing technology and bioinformatics, circRNAs are being increasingly identified. Extensive software is available for the identification of circRNAs based on second-generation sequencing data. Software based on comparison strategies or DeNOVO assembly is also currently present. In this field, the major issues are as follows. 1. Accuracy and false positive rate. Second-generation sequencing uses short sequences, the original data features are fuzzy, and the accepted depth of the sequence is often calculated by the likelihood algorithm in comparison, which leads to relatively low quantitative accuracy because of complex variable shear events [91]. In addition, due to the limited understanding of the cycling mechanisms, the current algorithm has a higher false positive rate and needs to be improved [92]. 2. Resource appropriation. The cyclization mechanism is a complex variable shear event, which requires a large number of parameters to adjust the operation; therefore, it occupies a considerable amount of resources and the operation speed is slow [92]. At present, the problems caused by data characteristics cannot be solved, but we can improve the understanding of the cyclization mechanism and improve the test to reduce the false positive rate. Resource consumption can also be decreased through development of new algorithms.

At least two mechanisms exist for the formation of mature circRNA molecules, which are different from the selective splicing of linear RNA [4]. Although having the same cis-elements, expression of circRNAs from the same loci varies in different cell lines and tissues [9395]. A recent study showed that nuclear factor 90 (NF90) and its isoform NF110, which are induced by human interleukin enhancer binding factor 3 (ILF3), could promote circRNA production [96]. DHX9, an abundant nuclear RNA helicase, binds specifically to inverted-repeat Alu elements that are transcribed as parts of genes. Loss of DHX9 leads to an increase in the number of circular-RNA-producing genes and amount of circular RNAs [97]. We predict that more of these molecules are involved in the regulation of circRNA production.

The current study found that circRNAs generally act as non-coding RNAs and mainly function as miRNA sponges, regulating transcription and participating in protein interactions. However, recent studies have found that circ-FBXW7 can encode a new protein of 21 kDa [98], whereas circ-ZNF609 also encodes a functional protein. This suggests that circRNAs can encode functional proteins, but it remains to be further explored whether this represents a primary function of these RNA molecules. Current data indicate that circRNA, as a ceRNA, can regulate tumor proliferation, apoptosis, and angiogenesis. We predict that circRNAs may play an important role in the regulation of other tumor characteristics, and thus may form a detailed and complex regulatory system.


An increase or decrease in circRNA expression can affect the biological characteristics of tumor cells. Research aimed at uncovering the mechanism underlying these effects has shown that circRNAs serve as ceRNAs to mediate miRNA functions and may serve as a target for cancer treatment. In the future, targeting of circRNA may be used not only for direct anti-cancer effects, but also in immunotherapy. Recent studies have shown that purified circRNA activates RIG-1, which has an immune effect, and then activates innate immunity against tumors [99, 100]. In addition, it has been suggested that circRNA can mediate cell communication between tumor immune components, as well as serve as a new tumor antigen, thus providing a potential target for immunotherapy [87]. However, how to effectively modulate circRNA levels in target cells remains an unresolved issue. At present, no tumor suppressor drug exists to target circRNAs. However, the roles and characteristics of circRNAs suggest that they have great potential for cancer treatment.



Protein kinase B


Bcl2-associated X protein


Cyclin-dependent kinase


Competing endogenous RNA


Circular RNA


Disheveled segment polarity protein 2


Epidermal growth factor


Epithelial-mesenchymal transition


Extracellular signal-regulated kinases ½


Epidermal growth factor


Glial cell-derived neurotrophic factor


GDNF family receptor alpha-1


Hepatocellular carcinoma


Hepatocyte growth factor


Insulin growth factor


Insulin growth factor 1 receptor


Interleukin 6 receptor


Long non-coding RNA


Mitogen activated protein kinase




miRNA response elements


Phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase


RNA binding proteins


Untranslated region



This study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81472531, 81572787, 81672683, 81672688, 81672993, 81702907 and 81772928), the Natural ScienceFoundation of Hunan Province (2015JJ1022, 2016JC2035 and 2017SK2105), and the Overseas Expertise Introduction Project for Discipline Innovation (111 Project, No. 111–2-12).

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Authors’ contributions

YZ, YD, XY, YM, CF, FX, DR, XY, CL, YW, FW collected the related literature and drafted the manuscript. CG, XW, XL, YL, GL, ZZ and WX participated in the design of the review and drafted the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

All authors have agreed on the contents of the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

The Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis of the Chinese Ministry of Health, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
The Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Cancer Invasion of the Chinese Ministry of Education, Basic Medical Science School and Cancer Research Institute, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
Hunan Key Laboratory of Nonresolving Inflammation and Cancer, Disease Genome Research Center, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
Department of Cancer Biology, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA


  1. Sanger HL, et al. Viroids are single-stranded covalently closed circular RNA molecules existing as highly base-paired rod-like structures. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1976;73(11):3852–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Hansen TB, et al. Natural RNA circles function as efficient microRNA sponges. Nature. 2013;495(7441):384–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Cocquerelle C, et al. Mis-splicing yields circular RNA molecules. FASEB J. 1993;7(1):155–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Wang Y, et al. Circular RNAs in human cancer. Mol Cancer. 2017;16(1):25.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Memczak S, et al. Circular RNAs are a large class of animal RNAs with regulatory potency. Nature. 2013;495(7441):333–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bo H, et al. Upregulated long non-coding RNA AFAP1-AS1 expression is associated with progression and poor prognosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Oncotarget. 2015;6(24):20404–18.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Wang Y, et al. Long non-coding RNA AFAP1-AS1 is a novel biomarker in various cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on the literature and GEO datasets. Oncotarget. 2017;8(60):102346–60.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Zeng Z, et al. AFAP1-AS1, a long noncoding RNA upregulated in lung cancer and promotes invasion and metastasis. Tumour Biol. 2016;37(1):729–37.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Tang, Y., et al., Linking long non-coding RNAs and SWI/SNF complexes to chromatin remodeling in cancer. Mol Cancer, 2017. 16(1): 42.Google Scholar
  10. Fan C, et al. Role of long non-coding RNAs in glucose metabolism in cancer. Mol Cancer. 2017;16(1):130.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Guo LL, et al. Competing endogenous RNA networks and gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21(41):11680–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. He B, et al. Epstein-Barr virus-encoded miR-BART6-3p inhibits cancer cell metastasis and invasion by targeting long non-coding RNA LOC553103. Cell Death Dis. 2016;7(9):e2353.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Song Y, et al. Epstein-Barr virus encoded miR-BART11 promotes inflammation-induced carcinogenesis by targeting FOXP1. Oncotarget. 2016;7(24):36783–99.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Tu C, et al. Genome-wide analysis of 18 Epstein-Barr viruses isolated from primary nasopharyngeal carcinoma biopsy specimens. J Virol. 2017;91(17):e00301-17.Google Scholar
  15. Kim HH, et al. HuR recruits let-7/RISC to repress c-Myc expression. Genes Dev. 2009;23(15):1743–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Webster RJ, et al. Regulation of epidermal growth factor receptor signaling in human cancer cells by microRNA-7. J Biol Chem. 2009;284(9):5731–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Du WW, et al. Foxo3 circular RNA retards cell cycle progression via forming ternary complexes with p21 and CDK2. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44(6):2846–58.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Salmena L, et al. A ceRNA hypothesis: the Rosetta stone of a hidden RNA language? Cell. 2011;146(3):353–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Gong Z, et al. An integrative transcriptomic analysis reveals p53 regulated miRNA, mRNA, and lncRNA networks in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Tumour Biol. 2016;37(3):3683–95.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Yu J, et al. Overexpression long non-coding RNA LINC00673 is associated with poor prognosis and promotes invasion and metastasis in tongue squamous cell carcinoma. Oncotarget. 2017;8(10):16621–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Yu J, et al. Upregulated long non-coding RNA LINC00152 expression is associated with progression and poor prognosis of tongue squamous cell carcinoma. J Cancer. 2017;8(4):523–30.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Wang Y, et al. The long noncoding RNA MALAT-1 is a novel biomarker in various cancers: a meta-analysis based on the GEO database and literature. J Cancer. 2016;7(8):991–1001.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Karreth FA, Pandolfi PP. ceRNA cross-talk in cancer: when ce-bling rivalries go awry. Cancer Discov. 2013;3(10):1113–21.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Cheng DL, et al. Competing endogenous RNA interplay in cancer: mechanism, methodology, and perspectives. Tumour Biol. 2015;36(2):479–88.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Mukherji S, et al. MicroRNAs can generate thresholds in target gene expression. Nat Genet. 2011;43(9):854–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Ala U, et al. Integrated transcriptional and competitive endogenous RNA networks are cross-regulated in permissive molecular environments. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(18):7154–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Kumar MS, et al. HMGA2 functions as a competing endogenous RNA to promote lung cancer progression. Nature. 2014;505(7482):212–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Tay Y, Karreth FA, Pandolfi PP. Aberrant ceRNA activity drives lung cancer. Cell Res. 2014;24(3):259–60.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Nishikura K. Editor meets silencer: crosstalk between RNA editing and RNA interference. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2006;7(12):919–31.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Maas S. Posttranscriptional recoding by RNA editing. Adv Protein Chem Struct Biol. 2012;86:193–224.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Mayr C, Bartel DP. Widespread shortening of 3'UTRs by alternative cleavage and polyadenylation activates oncogenes in cancer cells. Cell. 2009;138(4):673–84.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Tay Y, Rinn J, Pandolfi PP. The multilayered complexity of ceRNA crosstalk and competition. Nature. 2014;505(7483):344–52.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Tang W, et al. Silencing CDR1as inhibits colorectal cancer progression through regulating microRNA-7. Onco Targets Ther. 2017;10:2045–56.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Yu L, et al. The circular RNA Cdr1as act as an oncogene in hepatocellular carcinoma through targeting miR-7 expression. PLoS One. 2016;11(7):e0158347.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Pan H, et al. Overexpression of circular RNA ciRS-7 abrogates the tumor suppressive effect of miR-7 on gastric Cancer via PTEN/PI3K/AKT signaling pathway. J Cell Biochem. 2018;119(1):440-6.Google Scholar
  36. Wan L, et al. Circular RNA-ITCH suppresses lung Cancer proliferation via inhibiting the Wnt/beta-catenin pathway. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:1579490.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011;144(5):646–74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Malumbres M, Barbacid M. Cell cycle, CDKs and cancer: a changing paradigm. Nat Rev Cancer. 2009;9(3):153–66.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Kim EK, Choi EJ. Pathological roles of MAPK signaling pathways in human diseases. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2010;1802(4):396–405.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Xu L, et al. The circular RNA ciRS-7 (Cdr1as) acts as a risk factor of hepatic microvascular invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2017;143(1):17–27.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Pan H, et al. Overexpression of circular RNA ciRS-7 abrogates the tumor suppressive effect of miR-7 on gastric Cancer via PTEN/PI3K/AKT signaling pathway. J Cell Biochem. 2018;119(1):440–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Zhou X, et al. MicroRNA-7 inhibits tumor metastasis and reverses epithelial-mesenchymal transition through AKT/ERK1/2 inactivation by targeting EGFR in epithelial ovarian cancer. PLoS One. 2014;9(5):e96718.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Fang Y, et al. MicroRNA-7 inhibits tumor growth and metastasis by targeting the phosphoinositide 3-kinase/Akt pathway in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2012;55(6):1852–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Engeland K. Cell cycle arrest through indirect transcriptional repression by p53: I have a DREAM. Cell Death Differ. 2018;25(1):114–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Han D, et al. Circular RNA circMTO1 acts as the sponge of microRNA-9 to suppress hepatocellular carcinoma progression. Hepatology. 2017;66(4):1151–64.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Zhu X, et al. hsa_circ_0013958: a circular RNA and potential novel biomarker for lung adenocarcinoma. FEBS J. 2017;284(14):2170–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Chen L, et al. circRNA_100290 plays a role in oral cancer by functioning as a sponge of the miR-29 family. Oncogene. 2017;36(32):4551–61.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Zhong Z, Lv M, Chen J. Screening differential circular RNA expression profiles reveals the regulatory role of circTCF25-miR-103a-3p/miR-107-CDK6 pathway in bladder carcinoma. Sci Rep. 2016;6:30919.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Attwooll C, Lazzerini Denchi E, Helin K. The E2F family: specific functions and overlapping interests. EMBO J. 2004;23(24):4709–16.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Chen J, et al. Circular RNA profile identifies circPVT1 as a proliferative factor and prognostic marker in gastric cancer. Cancer Lett. 2017;388:208–19.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Xie H, et al. Emerging roles of circRNA_001569 targeting miR-145 in the proliferation and invasion of colorectal cancer. Oncotarget. 2016;7(18):26680–91.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  52. Zheng Q, et al. Circular RNA profiling reveals an abundant circHIPK3 that regulates cell growth by sponging multiple miRNAs. Nat Commun. 2016;7:11215.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  53. Fang XX, et al. Neuroprotection of interleukin-6 against NMDA-induced neurotoxicity is mediated by JAK/STAT3, MAPK/ERK, and PI3K/AKT signaling pathways. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2013;33(2):241–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Heinrich PC, et al. Principles of interleukin (IL)-6-type cytokine signalling and its regulation. Biochem J. 2003;374(Pt 1):1–20.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  55. Marotta LL, et al. The JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway is required for growth of CD44(+)CD24(−) stem cell-like breast cancer cells in human tumors. J Clin Invest. 2011;121(7):2723–35.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  56. Clevers H, Nusse R. Wnt/beta-catenin signaling and disease. Cell. 2012;149(6):1192–205.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Wei W, et al. The E3 ubiquitin ligase ITCH negatively regulates canonical Wnt signaling by targeting dishevelled protein. Mol Cell Biol. 2012;32(19):3903–12.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  58. Martinou JC, Youle RJ. Mitochondria in apoptosis: Bcl-2 family members and mitochondrial dynamics. Dev Cell. 2011;21(1):92–101.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  59. Kim M, et al. GFRA1 promotes cisplatin-induced chemoresistance in osteosarcoma by inducing autophagy. Autophagy. 2017;13(1):149–68.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Zhang H, et al. Increased circular RNA UBAP2 acts as a sponge of miR-143 to promote osteosarcoma progression. Oncotarget. 2017;8(37):61687–97.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  61. Tang YY, et al. Circular RNA hsa_circ_0001982 promotes breast Cancer cell carcinogenesis through decreasing miR-143. DNA Cell Biol. 2017;36(11):901–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Hsiao KY, et al. Noncoding effects of circular RNA CCDC66 promote Colon Cancer growth and metastasis. Cancer Res. 2017;77(9):2339–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Deng N, et al. Hsa_circ_0009910 promotes carcinogenesis by promoting the expression of miR-449a target IL6R in osteosarcoma. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2018;495(1):189–96.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Liu X, et al. miR-451 acts as a suppressor of angiogenesis in hepatocellular carcinoma by targeting the IL-6R-STAT3 pathway. Oncol Rep. 2016;36(3):1385–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. He R, et al. circGFRA1 and GFRA1 act as ceRNAs in triple negative breast cancer by regulating miR-34a. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2017;36(1):145.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  66. Kim MH, et al. Ape1/Ref-1 induces glial cell-derived neurotropic factor (GDNF) responsiveness by upregulating GDNF receptor alpha1 expression. Mol Cell Biol. 2009;29(8):2264–77.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  67. Cardiff RD. Epithelial to mesenchymal transition tumors: fallacious or Snail's pace? Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11(24 Pt 1):8534–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Chaffer CL, et al. EMT, cell plasticity and metastasis. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2016;35(4):645–54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Kim J, et al. MicroRNAs and metastasis: small RNAs play big roles. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2018;37(1):5-15.Google Scholar
  70. Fu L, et al. Hsa_circ_0005986 inhibits carcinogenesis by acting as a miR-129-5p sponge and is used as a novel biomarker for hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncotarget. 2017;8(27):43878–88.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  71. Goel HL, Mercurio AM. VEGF targets the tumour cell. Nat Rev Cancer. 2013;13(12):871–82.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  72. Zhong Z, et al. Circular RNA MYLK as a competing endogenous RNA promotes bladder cancer progression through modulating VEGFA/VEGFR2 signaling pathway. Cancer Lett. 2017;403:305–17.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Zheng J, et al. TTBK2 circular RNA promotes glioma malignancy by regulating miR-217/HNF1beta/Derlin-1 pathway. J Hematol Oncol. 2017;10(1):52.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  74. Granados-Riveron JT, Aquino-Jarquin G. Does the linear Sry transcript function as a ceRNA for miR-138? The sense of antisense. F1000Res. 2014;3:90.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  75. Guo JU, et al. Expanded identification and characterization of mammalian circular RNAs. Genome Biol. 2014;15(7):409.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  76. Wang Q, et al. Downregulation of microRNA-138 enhances the proliferation, migration and invasion of cholangiocarcinoma cells through the upregulation of RhoC/p-ERK/MMP-2/MMP-9. Oncol Rep. 2013;29(5):2046–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Man SM, Kanneganti TD. Converging roles of caspases in inflammasome activation, cell death and innate immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2016;16(1):7–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Guo H, et al. Nickel chloride (NiCl2)-caused inflammatory responses via activation of NF-kappaB pathway and reduction of anti-inflammatory mediator expression in the kidney. Oncotarget. 2015;6(30):28607–20.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  79. Yan W, et al. High-mobility group box 1 activates caspase-1 and promotes hepatocellular carcinoma invasiveness and metastases. Hepatology. 2012;55(6):1863–75.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  80. Jin H, et al. Circular RNA hsa-circ-0016347 promotes proliferation, invasion and metastasis of osteosarcoma cells. Oncotarget. 2017;8(15):25571–81.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  81. Li Y, et al. Circular RNA is enriched and stable in exosomes: a promising biomarker for cancer diagnosis. Cell Res. 2015;25(8):981–4.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  82. Holdt LM, Kohlmaier A, Teupser D. Molecular roles and function of circular RNAs in eukaryotic cells. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2018;75(6):1071-98.Google Scholar
  83. Lasda E, Parker R. Circular RNAs co-precipitate with extracellular vesicles: a possible mechanism for circRNA clearance. PLoS One. 2016;11(2):e0148407.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  84. Suzuki H, et al. Characterization of RNase R-digested cellular RNA source that consists of lariat and circular RNAs from pre-mRNA splicing. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34(8):e63.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  85. Shang X, et al. Comprehensive circular RNA profiling reveals that hsa_circ_0005075, a new circular RNA biomarker, is involved in hepatocellular Crcinoma development. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(22):e3811.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  86. Li W, et al. Characterization of hsa_circ_0004277 as a new biomarker for acute myeloid leukemia via circular RNA profile and bioinformatics analysis. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(3):E597.Google Scholar
  87. Xu Z, et al. The potential role of circRNA in tumor immunity regulation and immunotherapy. Front Immunol. 2018;9:9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  88. Coussens LM, Werb Z. Inflammation and cancer. Nature. 2002;420(6917):860–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  89. Topalian SL, Drake CG, Pardoll DM. Immune checkpoint blockade: a common denominator approach to cancer therapy. Cancer Cell. 2015;27(4):450–61.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  90. Yang ZG, et al. The circular RNA interacts with STAT3, increasing its nuclear translocation and wound repair by modulating Dnmt3a and miR-17 function. Mol Ther. 2017;25(9):2062–74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Han Y, et al. Advanced applications of RNA sequencing and challenges. Bioinform Biol Insights. 2015;9(Suppl 1):29–46.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  92. Kristensen LS, et al. Circular RNAs in cancer: opportunities and challenges in the field. Oncogene. 2018;37(5):555–65.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Dong R, et al. Increased complexity of circRNA expression during species evolution. RNA Biol. 2017;14(8):1064–74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. Rybak-Wolf A, et al. Circular RNAs in the mammalian brain are highly abundant, conserved, and dynamically expressed. Mol Cell. 2015;58(5):870–85.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. Zhang Y, et al. The biogenesis of nascent circular RNAs. Cell Rep. 2016;15(3):611–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. Li X, et al. Coordinated circRNA biogenesis and function with NF90/NF110 in viral infection. Mol Cell. 2017;67(2):214–27. e7View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. Aktas T, et al. DHX9 suppresses RNA processing defects originating from the Alu invasion of the human genome. Nature. 2017;544(7648):115–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. Yang Y, et al. Novel role of FBXW7 circular RNA in repressing glioma tumorigenesis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018;110(3).
  99. Cadena C, Hur S. Antiviral immunity and circular RNA: no end in sight. Mol Cell. 2017;67(2):163–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. Huang Y, et al. p53 regulates mesenchymal stem cell-mediated tumor suppression in a tumor microenvironment through immune modulation. Oncogene. 2014;33(29):3830–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar


© The Author(s). 2018