RNA-based therapies: A cog in the wheel of lung cancer defense
Molecular Cancer volume 20, Article number: 54 (2021)
Lung cancer (LC) is a heterogeneous disease consisting mainly of two subtypes, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small cell lung cancer (SCLC), and remains the leading cause of death worldwide. Despite recent advances in therapies, the overall 5-year survival rate of LC remains less than 20%. The efficacy of current therapeutic approaches is compromised by inherent or acquired drug-resistance and severe off-target effects. Therefore, the identification and development of innovative and effective therapeutic approaches are critically desired for LC. The development of RNA-mediated gene inhibition technologies was a turning point in the field of RNA biology. The critical regulatory role of different RNAs in multiple cancer pathways makes them a rich source of targets and innovative tools for developing anticancer therapies. The identification of antisense sequences, short interfering RNAs (siRNAs), microRNAs (miRNAs or miRs), anti-miRs, and mRNA-based platforms holds great promise in preclinical and early clinical evaluation against LC. In the last decade, RNA-based therapies have substantially expanded and tested in clinical trials for multiple malignancies, including LC. This article describes the current understanding of various aspects of RNA-based therapeutics, including modern platforms, modifications, and combinations with chemo-/immunotherapies that have translational potential for LC therapies.
Lung cancer (LC) remains one of the primary causes of cancer-related death in men and women globally . In 2020, approximately 228,820 new cases and 135,720 deaths due to LC had been reported in the United States alone . LC is categorized into non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small cell lung cancer (SCLC). These two main subtypes have prominent intra-tumor heterogeneity and are further classified based on mutations and drivers [2, 3]. The majority of LC (~80-85%) fall in the category of NSCLC that includes adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and large cell carcinoma [4, 5]. Nearly 10-15% of cases belong to SCLC, categorizing into SCLC-A, SCLC-N, SCLC-Y, and SCLC-P subtypes [6, 7]. The statistics of the last two decades showed that the 5-year survival for NSCLC remains less than 20%, and for SCLC, it is nearly 5% [1, 6, 8, 9]. Some of the routinely investigated oncogenes for targeting in NSCLC include Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), and echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4-anaplastic lymphoma kinase (EML4-ALK). Genes implicated in SCLC include poly [ADP-ribose] polymerase (PARP), delta-like protein 3 (DLL3), aurora kinases, and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) [10,11,12,13]. Approximately 30% of LC patients harbor activating KRAS mutations, making it a potential drug target for LC therapy. However, mutant KRAS targeting drugs have been under development for many years and are only now being evaluated in clinical trials [8, 14]. Similarly, treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the patients harboring EGFR mutations has been relatively ineffective in improving the overall survival (OS) [12, 15,16,17,18]. Similar gaps exist in SCLC therapies: for example, most patients develop resistance against chemotherapies, and due to the restricted expression of receptor antigens (PD1/PD-L1), immunotherapies show a narrow range of activity [19,20,21,22,23].
The major reason for the failure of currently available therapeutic approaches is the development of drug resistance associated with gene mutations, cancer stem cells, overexpression of oncogenes, and deletion or inactivation of tumor suppressor genes [10, 19, 24,25,26,27,28]. The collective outcomes suggested that the ‘tried-and-true’ therapeutic regimen to save LC patients is lacking and remains anticipated. To overcome these limitations, there is a rapidly growing interest in the field of RNA interference (RNAi) and RNA-based therapeutics, as several studies have shown that silencing of specific genes or overexpression of therapeutic proteins can serve as an effective combination modality with chemo- or immunotherapy [29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37]. The last decade witnessed the utilization of RNA therapeutics with chemotherapy and immunotherapy and emerges as an active research hotspot for the development of different types of cancer therapies . The combination of adoptive cell transfer (ACT) therapy with self-delivering RNA interference (RNAi) was developed to down-regulate the expression of checkpoint proteins by degrading the respective mRNAs before their translation to proteins [39, 40]. These combinations also overcome drug resistance and improve the efficacy of chemo-/immunotherapy [39, 41]. RNA therapeutics can modulate multiple pathways, including gene silencing and overexpression, manipulation of enzyme kinetics, sensitization, and immune activation [37, 42, 43].
Additionally, advances in the field of noncoding RNAs have established their role in normal cell physiology or regulation of different molecular pathways, and studies demonstrating the direct role of noncoding RNAs in various pathologies have promoted the development of RNA-based therapeutics [44,45,46,47,48]. The RNA therapy-related studies suggested that these molecules have an immense potential to regulate multiple cellular pathways by inhibiting various genes [43, 49]. The ease of simultaneous targeting of multiple pathways provides an edge to the RNA-based therapeutics platform to target the different aspects of cancer such as tumor growth, metastasis, and drug resistance [47, 48, 50,51,52,53].
The current cancer treatment modalities, including surgery and chemotherapy, are far from ideal approaches, especially for the advanced stage tumors, as most of the tumors exhibit mutational diversity [7, 54,55,56]. These mutational heterogeneities play a significant role in cancer progression, chemoresistance, and immune escape [54, 55, 57]. Thus, instead of conventional targeted therapies (that include protein as a drug target), RNA-based treatment strategies are potentially superior, as they have a diverse target range with enhanced drug-like properties for cancer therapies [38, 58]. Several approaches have been employed to modulate gene-function at RNA level in the cancer cells, including base editing, small molecules targeting RNA, employment of synthetic antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs), and exogenously expressed mRNAs [42, 43, 59]. The promise of RNA-based therapeutic modalities is underscored by the successful outcomes of mRNA vaccine approach in treating the disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus (COVID-19), and US Food & Drug Administration (FDA) approval of Patisiran (first RNAi-based treatment for hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis) and Givosiran (RNAi-drug for acute intermittent porphyria), and provide a strong rationale to explore RNA moieties as a novel therapeutic strategy for cancer [37, 60,61,62]. The recent advancements in terms of time, safety, pharmacokinetics, and potency further provide support for exploring RNA toolbox to develop potential anticancer therapies. This review article surveys the classification, applications, and recent progress of RNA-based treatments, including combination with first-line chemotherapy and immunotherapy for LC field advancing RNAs as therapeutic agents, the available preclinical and clinical studies with the future sequel to reach the patients.
Platforms for RNA based cancer therapeutics
RNA-based therapeutic strategies have emerged as an alternative to the conventional protein-based therapies that are difficult to pursue, as adapter proteins or transcription factors. These types of protein molecules can be regulated by modulating mRNA levels or translation of proteins [53, 63]. The primary focus of oligonucleotide-based therapeutics includes gene silencing or activation and splice modulation that provides an extended range of potential targets beyond the conventionally accessible pharmacological strategies. These modalities follow the universal Watson–Crick base pairing rule of complementarity, thus providing the direct interrogation of different putative target sequences. Therefore, it is easy to rationalize, design, and screen-specific leads if the primary sequence of the target gene is available. To achieve the desirable functions (such as gene silencing, splice modulation, transcript degradation, translational activation, or antigen synthesis), different oligonucleotide-based platforms, including antisense oligonucleotides, RNA-interference molecules, and mRNA transcripts, have been developed. We discuss each platform in detail in the following sections.
Antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) are ~18-30 nucleotide long, single-stranded, synthetic polymers of nucleic acids with diverse chemistries [44, 64]. The ASOs are small molecule drugs that target mRNAs based on complementary base pairing and interfere with different aspects of gene expression and regulation. These nucleotide sequences can interfere with DNA unwinding, transcription, mRNA splicing, gene expression/translational profile of target genes through different mechanisms [38, 58, 65]. Based on their mechanism of action the ASOs can be divided into two subcategories; one-acts by promoting RNA cleavage and degradation (either by ribonuclease H1 (RNase H1) or argonaute 2), and the other is occupancy-only mediated regulation, sometimes referred to as steric block (Fig. 1) [58, 64].
Binding of ASOs to the target RNA cleaves the target at ASO binding site, facilitating the degradation of target RNA and thus downregulating gene expression (Fig. 1). This is one of the most widely used approaches for downregulation of genes where overexpression is associated with the manifestation or progression of disease [58, 66]. RNase H1 is a highly selective endonuclease that specifically acts on the RNA of the RNA-DNA heteroduplex [58, 67, 68]. The detailed enzymatic and cellular functions of RNase H1 have been uncovered now, and the substrate specificity of RNase H1 is continuously utilized for the development of RNA-based therapeutics [43, 44, 68, 69]. In mammalian cells, the distribution of RNase H1 is ubiquitous and found in the cytoplasm, mitochondria, and nucleus [69, 70]. It serves various genomic functions, including DNA repair, resolution of R-loops, removal of pre-mRNAs associated with chromatin, transcriptional termination, maintenance of genome integrity, and removal of Okazaki fragment-associated RNA [44, 69,70,71,72,73,74]. Interestingly, the ASOs designed to utilize endonuclease activity as the mechanism of their action must possess a stretch of at least five DNA-nucleotides. Thus, currently used ASOs that follow RNase H-competent mechanisms are based on the patterns of DNA ‘gapmer’, a hybrid type of oligonucleotide sequence where the central stretch of DNA known as ‘gap’ is inserted between chemically modified RNA flanking sequences (that helps in target binding), Fig. 1. The main advantage of using RNase H1 based ASOs is that it makes the targeting of nuclear transcripts (for example, pre-mRNAs and long non-coding RNAs) easy. These are less accessible to other approaches like small interfering RNA (siRNA) .
Steric block or occupancy-only mediated mechanism utilizes high-affinity ASOs to bind with the target RNA without inducing the direct degradation of target RNA [66, 75] (Fig. 1). This class of ASOs consists of nucleotides that do not form RNA-DNA duplex, which acts as a substrate for RNase H1 or Ago2. Therefore, to avoid the formation of RNase H substrates and unwanted cleavage of target RNA, the ASOs must be modified chemically or comprises of a mixture of different nucleotide chemistries, generally called ‘mixmers’ in such a way that stretches of consecutive DNA-like nucleotides can be avoided [64, 75]. Some common chemical modifications include thiophosphoroamidate, thiophosphoroamidate morpholinos, nucleoside moieties, and peptide nucleic acid attachments (Fig. 2) [76, 77]. Steric block ASOs bind with the specific sequence of target and work by modulating the translation, processing of RNA, splicing, RNA-protein interactions, and interactome of target RNA [65, 78, 79]. The most common application of these ASOs is to manage the selective exclusion or inclusion of exon(s) through the modulation of alternative splicing (for example, exon skipping and inclusion), Fig. 1 [80,81,82]. Interestingly, the ASOs steric block approach can be used for corrupting the target splice variant, where the exon skipping method hinders or downregulates the translation of the target transcript (Fig. 1) [83, 84]. The splice correction/inclusion approach has been used to correct or restore the translational frame to rescue the synthesis of therapeutic proteins [81, 85,86,87,88,89]. The ASOs perform this function by masking the splicing signals, making target invisible to the spliceosome, and finally alter the spliceosome’s splicing decisions [58, 81, 90].
Earlier, the antisense approaches were mainly used to downregulate the gene expression or translation, but not broadly as an alternative for the situations where the overexpression of beneficial proteins was required as a therapeutic strategy. More recently, the combinatorial investigation of several approaches like ASOs, micro-/si- RNAs to increase the target RNA expression or protein translation has revolutionized the RNA-based therapeutic strategies for different diseases, including cancer [44, 46, 65]. Further studies have established the utilization of ASOs for the targeting of microRNAs, and ultimately an efficient approach to enhance protein production (Fig. 1) [65, 79, 91, 92]. The microRNAs (short RNAs consisting of 21-23 nucleotides) inhibit the gene expression or protein translation and control associated gene networks. These observations have inspired the development of ASOs targeting microRNAs that block or repress their binding properties with target RNA transcripts, resulting in the translational escalation of microRNA-regulated genes (Fig. 1) [65, 79]. As microRNAs possess cell- or tissue-specific activities to inhibit the translation of multiple RNAs or targets, blocking of a single microRNA can alter the expression of different proteins. Alternatively, the utilization of specific ASOs against 5`-untranslated regions of mRNAs (that generally represses translation through upstream open reading frames or stem-loop structures) is a more precise and targeted approach to increase the protein production of associated RNA targets [44, 65, 79]. Alternative splicing is a beneficial strategy for generating protein diversity. ASOs can be utilized to induce isoform switching for promoting the expression of therapeutic/beneficial proteins and/or inhibiting the expression of disease-associated proteins (Fig. 1). Based on these mechanisms, three ASOs have received FDA approval for splice-switching: golodirsen, usinersen, and eteplirsen .
The seminal paper published by Andrew Fire and Craig C. Mello in 1998 suggested the role of double-stranded RNAs in post-transcriptional gene silencing through a mechanism known as RNA interference (RNAi) and revolutionized the field of gene silencing . This study contributed to the understanding of gene silencing and/or expression-related puzzles in fungi and plants and hit out the field by establishing the central role of non-coding RNAs in gene expression. Later, two independent studies from Elbashir et al.,  and Caplen et al.,  reported that small size double-stranded RNAs (approximately 19-22 nucleotides in length) having sequence homology to the silenced gene are the key mediators of sequence-specific post-transcriptional gene silencing in animals and plants. These small/short interfering RNAs (siRNAs) are processed from longer dsRNAs by ribonuclease III and maintain a characteristic structure (with 5'-phosphate/3'-hydroxyl ends) with a 2-nucleotide 3'-overhang on each duplex strand [94, 95]. These studies established that the siRNA molecule induces RNAi in mammalian cells without undesired interferon responses and is now accepted as a simplistic universal biological tool for gene silencing studies. RNAi is a mechanism used by the cells to downregulate gene expression in genetic abnormalities and infections . Hence, RNAi approaches were explored and adapted as a potential therapeutic strategy for treating different diseases, including cancer [38, 47, 96,97,98].
The potency, flexibility, and diversity of the RNAi or siRNA approach are alluring for prospective drug development targeting proteins that remain undruggable through classical approaches of small molecule inhibitors [99,100,101]. RNAi-mediated therapeutic approaches silence genes by utilizing the natural machinery of the targeted cells. These approaches include siRNAs, small hairpin RNAs (shRNAs), microRNAs (miRNAs), long double-stranded RNAs processed through Dicer, and small specific sequences synthesized to meet the RNAi criterion. Double-stranded siRNAs (ds siRNA) are pro-drugs-like molecules consisting of the complementary duplex of sense and antisense strand. Interestingly, the sense strand (passenger strand) of siRNA formally satisfies the definition of drug delivery vehicle; it is non-covalently associated with antisense or the guide strand that is complementary to the target RNA/transcript, protects it from degradation and helps in the loading of antisense strand to Ago2 (Fig. 3) [101, 102]. After loading to Ago2, the sense strand is removed before performing the pharmacological activity. The antisense strand guides the Ago2-mediated RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) to the target site, and the complete complementarity of siRNA with the target leads to the cleavage (known as slicer activity) and silences gene expression (Fig. 3) [102,103,104,105]. Ago2 is an RNA endonuclease with RNase H domains, but unlike RNase H1, it cleaves RNA in RNA-RNA duplex (not DNA-RNA duplex) . Ago2 complex plays an important role in facilitating the binding of antisense strand to the target transcript, and thus, Ago2 has become a key regulator for efficient RNA-based pharmacological mechanisms with different features [102, 107]. The loading of siRNA or specifically antisense strand into Ago2 is a very efficient process, but for effective binding and cleavage activities, Ago2 has some strict structural requirements . For example, availability of 5'-phosphate or phosphate analog and comparatively fewer modifications were allowed at 2' site, located at the distal site of seed sequence (nucleotide sequence that recognizes RNA targeting site) [64, 109].
Ago2 also prolongs the duration of action as once the antisense strand is loaded, it retains the strand for a more extended period [107, 110]. The localization of Ago2 is cytoplasmic; hence, siRNAs are used as prominent tools for targeting cytoplasmic RNAs (Fig. 3) [64, 102]. Studies suggest that some modifications in conventional siRNA sequences or designs can improve the pharmacological benefits like enhanced potency and reduced off-targeting. Few examples of atypical siRNAs include single-stranded RNAs [111, 112], divalent siRNAs , self-delivering siRNAs , small internally segmented siRNAs , and Dicer substrate siRNAs . The outcomes of RNAi studies recently led to the FDA approval of two siRNA based therapeutics named Patisiran and Givosiran [61, 62].
MicroRNAs (miRNAs or miRs) are short non-coding RNAs that trigger endogenous RNAi by regulating the stability or inducing mRNA degradation. The miRNAs have diverse role in various physiological and pathophysiological progressions, including cell-cycle progression , cancer development and progression [118,119,120], metabolism , diabetes , infectious diseases [123, 124], muscular dystrophy , and immunity . Therefore, miRNAs are an important class of putative drug targets. The biogenesis of miRNAs follows a systematic process; the initial or primary miRNA strand is transcribed in the nucleus (Fig. 3) [127, 128]. The miRNA hairpin structure, embedded within the primary miRNA strand, is sequentially processed by DROSHA and DICER (both belong to the RNase III family) and finally emerges as a mature miRNA consisting of 21-22 nucleotides [127, 128]. Mature miRNA sequence is then loaded to the RISC complex and modulates gene expression by binding with the 3'-untranslated region (UTR) of the target gene (Fig. 3). The inhibition of gene expression is directly dependent on miRNA’s complementarity to that of target mRNA . In addition to the inhibition of gene expression, miRNAs also modulate transcriptional regulation. Recent studies showed that miRNAs regulate the methylation of CpG islands in the promoter region of different genes and, thus, directly regulate the transcriptional regulations through epigenetic modifications [129,130,131,132]. The primary mode of action for miRNA and siRNA is similar, as both form RISC complex for targeted gene silencing (Fig. 3). The main difference is that siRNAs degraded or inhibited mRNA translation with 100% complementarity and thus precisely follow target specificity. In contrast, miRNAs usually bind with incomplete complementarity and perform gene silencing through slicer-independent pathways. The miRNAs target 3'-UTR of mRNA and suppress the gene expression or decrease its stability. Because miRNAs can act through low complementarity; thus, they could have multiple targets, but the primary safety check is the restriction of imperfect base pairing; otherwise, one miRNA can affect thousands of genes.
Interestingly, the ASOs have also been developed and employed for miRNA inhibition through direct binding to the small RNA molecules in the RISC complex, and these ASOs are known as antagomirs or anti-miRs (Fig. 1) [133,134,135]. Miravirsen (also known as SPC3649) was the first anti-miRNA drug designed to treat chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV), and it targets the activity of liver-specific miR-122 . The 5'-UTR of HCV RNA consists of two binding sites for miR-122, which stabilizes the viral RNA [137, 138]. Miravirsen inhibits this binding by sequestering miR-122, making it readily available for exonuclease degradation, decreases replication, and thus reduces the viral load [139, 140]. However, viral recovery in patient serum and resistance to Miravirsen was observed, along with the development of new mutations [140, 141]. Similarly, another anti-miR drug, RG-101, was designed (by Regulus Therapeutics) against miR-122 and used to control HCV infections but failed to improve overall outcomes in clinical trials . Similarly, RG-101 induced viral rebound, along with the substitutions in the binding regions of miR-122 (in the 5' UTR of the HCV genome) and developed resistance . Outcomes of another clinical trial suggested that treatment with RG-101 restores the natural killer (NK) cell population that controls HCV infection . A recent clinical trial suggested the potential of a combination regimen of RG-101 and GSK2878175 (a non-nucleoside NS5B polymerase inhibitor) to develop a single-visit cure for HCV patients .
Several groups are also developing anti-miR drugs against miR-21, miR-17, miR-155, and miR-29 for cancer, kidney, and other diseases [58, 145,146,147,148]. These miRNAs (especially miR-21) have a diverse role in lung cancer establishment, progression, and metastasis, so these anti-miRs can also be utilized as an effective therapy for lung cancer. Steric block ASOs are also being developed to target specific miRNAs. These oligonucleotides obstruct the regulatory interactions of miRNAs with target mRNA (Fig. 1), thus providing an important strategy to downregulate the activity of diseases specific miRNAs . The details of related reports and implications of anti-miRs/ASOs in lung cancer therapies are discussed in forthcoming sections.
The fundamental step of the central dogma of molecular biology is that mRNA carries the information from DNA and transfer to the protein synthesis factories . Protein molecules are the ‘workhorses’ of the body as nearly every function (normal and disease-related) of the human body is performed by different proteins . Interestingly, the mRNA is equally critical as DNA because the human body would never utilize the genetic code if mRNA is not available, or proteins will never be synthesized. Besides, normal physiological functioning of the human body, downregulation of therapeutic proteins or upregulation of diseases associated proteins, and entry of foreign proteins lead to the disease condition [151, 152]. The important functional role associated with different proteins ultimately clues towards the development of protein-targeted drugs or therapies.
Due to several difficulties in protein targeting, researchers moved to DNA-based gene therapy. However, the stumpy likelihood of genome integration and transient nature makes it challenging to use in the clinics [153,154,155]. On the other hand, mRNA is a molecule that overcomes these two major pitfalls (targeting and genome integration) and has emerged as a strong alternative to conventional gene therapy strategies [153, 155,156,157]. Additionally, it uses natural or homegrown cell machinery for protein synthesis that return properly folded mature therapeutic protein with all post-translational modifications, thus providing better opportunities over recombinant proteins . The treatment strategies based on mRNA therapies involve the implications of specific mRNA sequences into the patient’s body and utilization of cellular machinery to synthesize specific proteins involved in the disease progression. This method is applicable in multiple conditions, as it can be used to overexpress specific proteins whose downregulation is associated with disease and could be used to elicit an antigenic response by inducing the expression of specific antigens [37, 51, 158].
However, initial studies suggested that in-vitro transcribed/synthesized mRNA molecules are less stable as they are readily accessible to nucleases and easily detected by toll-like receptors (TLRs) and activate dendritic cells (DCs) that generate innate immune response [159,160,161]. To understand the immunogenic responses associated with synthetic mRNAs, researchers have incorporated several modifications in RNA nucleosides [162,163,164]. A very interesting study by Kariko et al. showed that modification of mammalian RNA nucleosides (for example, 5-methylcytidine, N6-methyladenosine, 5-methyluracil, pseudouridine, and N7-methylguanosine) decreases the immunomodulatory signals and DCs exposed to these modified mRNAs reduced activation and cytokine production compared to DCs exposed to unmodified RNAs . This is also a defense mechanism utilized by innate immune response of the human body to bacterial or other foreign non-mammalian RNAs. These organisms have less abundance of modified nucleosides that potentially activate TLRs expressing cells and DCs . Thus, modifications in nucleosides overcome RNA-mediated activation of DCs. This approach can potentially affect the design and development of mRNA-based therapies.
Following their synthesis, RNA molecules can undergo more than 150 different chemical modifications in the cells that impact their stability, distribution, and other post-transcriptional events; collectively, these modifications are known as ‘epitranscriptome’ or RNA epigenetic modifications [166,167,168,169]. Some of the common modified mRNA nucleosides are N6-methyladenosine (m6A), 5-methylcytidine (m5C), N7-methylguanosine (m7G), pseudouridine (s2U), inosine, and many 2′-O-methylated nucleosides (a part of the 5′-terminal cap), as shown in Fig. 2. Each chemical modification plays a specific role like, m6A enhances mRNA turnover, regulates embryonic stem cell development, favors RNA decay, pre-mRNA splicing, adipogenesis, and prostate cancer bone metastasis [170,171,172,173,174]. Similarly, s2U regulates the structure of RNA, increases stability, and alters translational efficiency [175, 176], while m5C induces codon rewiring and, in combination with other modifications, guides miRNA targeting [166, 177]. For translation, ribosomes scan mRNA transcripts at the 5′ UTR within Kozak sequences to identify start codon, but the length of 5′ UTR, presence of cis-elements, and m6A modulate ribosome scanning and finally regulate the translational efficiency [172, 178, 179]. Interestingly, some transcripts that retain m6A in their 5' UTR can be translated in a 5′ cap-independent manner due to the direct binding of 5' UTR m6A with the eukaryotic initiation factor 3 (eIF3), which alone is enough to recruit the 43S ribosomal complex and initiate translation . Inhibition of N6-methylation in adenosine specifically decreases the translation of mRNA transcripts consisting 5'UTR m6A. The cap-independent translation mechanism was studied for heat shock protein 70 (Hsp70) mRNA, and it was observed that cellular stress induces a global rearrangement of m6A in the transcriptome Hsp70, making more mRNAs with m6A in the 5' UTR [180, 181]. Thus, m6A in 5' UTR helps translate the mRNA under stress conditions through bypassing the dependency of 5' cap-binding proteins and suggests that such RNA modifications can be incorporated while designing and optimizing therapeutic RNAs/mRNAs.
With the diverse applications of RNA-based therapies and the potential to translate into clinics, synthetic mRNAs have emerged as a powerful tool and alternative to conventional therapies/vaccines. In recent years, significant advancement has been achieved to develop mRNA-based therapeutics for immune-oncology, protein replacement therapies, and vaccine development [37, 60, 182]. Indeed, mRNA-based vaccine formulations developed by Pfizer and Moderna were developed and approved in record time to combat coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by the global outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) [182,183,184]. The successful safety and efficacy outcomes of these vaccines are likely to enhance the enthusiasm and trust, and likely to dictate the future course of RNA-based therapeutics in general. Based on recent mRNA-based cancer vaccine studies in melanoma  and other infections like COVID-19 mRNA-based vaccine, the developmental route map for the mRNA-based LC vaccines is outlined in Fig. 4.
Implications of RNA-based platforms in LC
ASOs in LC therapy
The ASOs have broad applications for different anticancer therapies, including LC. The implications of anti-angiogenic therapies for lung squamous cell carcinoma are limited and associated with adverse side effects [185,186,187]. Recent evidences established the role of long noncoding RNAs in tumor progression and VEGF modulation that guide the potential of RNA-based therapies for the development of anti-angiogenic strategies for LC [188,189,190,191,192,193,194,195]. Overexpression of LINC00173.v1 was associated with proliferation, tumorigenesis, migration of vascular endothelial cells, and poor overall survival in squamous cell carcinoma patients . LINC000173.v1 upregulates the expression of VEGFA through miR-511-5p sponging and inhibition of LINC000173.v1 using ASOs resulted in decreased tumor growth and enhanced cisplatin sensitivity .
A recent study demonstrated the potential of ASOs to downregulate the expression of metadherin, which plays a role in T cell exhaustion and WNT signaling . Downregulation of metadherin in cell lines and spontaneous mouse models using locked nucleic acid (LNA) modified ASOs significantly decreased LC progression and metastasis . Similarly, miR-21 is among the top differentially upregulated microRNAs in NSCLC and regulates cell growth, proliferation, migration, invasion, apoptosis, and drug resistance [198,199,200,201,202]. Ge et al. recently reported the use of phosphorothioate ASOs to inhibit miR-21 expression and found that these ASOs decrease the proliferation of NSCLC cells and induce apoptosis through caspase-8 pathway activation .
KRAS is a frequently mutated gene in different cancers, and activating mutations in KRAS are observed in 20% of human tumors, including NSCLC [54, 203,204,205,206]. KRAS is a highly desirable target for cancer therapy; however, the development of pharmacological small molecules for mutant KRAS remains challenging, and most of the identified inhibitors are still in early-stage clinical trials [14, 205,206,207]. AZD4785 is a high-affinity KRAS mRNA-targeting therapeutic ASO that selectively decreases mutant KRAS mRNA as well as protein. Unlike the inhibitors of RAS-MAPK pathways, this depletion did not activate the feedback loop of the MAPK pathway. AZD4785 downregulated the effector pathways and selectively decreased the proliferation of cells harboring mutant KRAS . The systemic injection of AZD4785 to NSCLC mice xenografts and patient-derived xenografts harboring mutant KRAS inhibited KRAS expression and induced strong antitumor activity. This suggested that AZD4785 and other novel ASOs are innovative therapeutic approaches for treating KRAS- and other mutated oncogenes.
Wang et al. reported the construction of novel polyethylene glycol (PEG) ligated antisense therapeutic oligonucleotides that form a bottlebrush-like structure consisting of PEG side chains, DNA backbone, and overhangs of antisense oligonucleotides . These formulations possess PEG at high density on the surface, which decreases the undesired interactions of ASOs with DNA and proteins (protecting from enzymatic degradation) and enhances the chances of antisense overhangs to hybridize with target mRNA, thereby reduce protein expression. This study evaluated KRAS targeting by these PEGylated ASOs in lung cancer. These modified ASOs had higher inhibition efficacies than conventional hairpins, and the antisense molecules decreased the proliferation of LC cell line expressing mutant KRAS (G12C) gene . These ASOs showed enhanced in vivo retention time (due to high biological compatibility of PEG) and represent an important strategy to improve biopharmaceutical efficacies and translational applicability of ASOs mediated therapies.
ADP-ribosylation factor like 4C (ARL4C), a member of small GTP-binding protein family, is frequently overexpressed in adenomatous hyperplasic lesions (precursors to adenocarcinoma) and lung cancer . ARL4C promotes cell proliferation and is a potential therapeutic target for lung cancer [211,212,213]. ARL4C expression is directly correlated with different histologic stages (adenocarcinoma, minimally invasive adenocarcinoma, and invasive adenocarcinoma) and is associated with a poor prognosis. ASOs targeting ARL4C (ASO-1316) showed decreased RAS-related substrate activity, inhibited cell proliferation and migration, and suppressed nuclear import of Yes-associated protein-1 (YAP-1) in lung cancer cell lines bearing KRAS and EGFR mutations. In addition, ASO-1316 reduced tumorigenicity of KRAS/EGFR mutated lung cancer cell lines in orthotopic mice models . This study established the role of ARL4C in the initiation of premalignant lesions, tumor progression and development, and demonstrated the utility of ASO-1316 as a potential therapeutic agent for LC patients with ARL4C overexpression, regardless of mutation status.
A recent study demonstrated that ASOs attached with deoxyadenosine (dA40) can form complex with β-glucan schizophyllan (SPG) , and ASOs-dA40/SPG complex can be recognized by Dectin-1 (a β-glucan receptor) expressed on lung cancer cells and antigen-presenting cells (APCs) [215, 216]. ASOs-dA40/SPG targeting KRAS inhibited KRAS expression in Dectin-1 expressing LC cells and correspondingly decreased cell growth. This ASOs-dA40/SPG complex enhanced the cytotoxic effect of gemcitabine due to the ability of dA40 moiety to directly interact with gemcitabine. Interestingly, after internalization, this interaction dissociates, and gemcitabine is easily released from the complex . It means that conjugation of SPG and dA40 bearing ASOs can also serve as potential carriers for gemcitabine and other structurally similar drugs. Due to this dual ability of ASOs-dA40/SPG complexes to target KRAS and enhance gemcitabine efficacy, it will be of interest to evaluate these formulations in clinical trials.
Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) is a central molecule for oncogenic/non-oncogenic signaling. STAT3 overexpression is associated with the progression of various cancers, including LC, making it a potential target for cancer therapy . AZD9150, an advanced ASO consisting of ethyl-modifications, was designed to target STAT3 as it is challenging to target transcription factors through small molecule inhibitors . Preclinical evaluations demonstrated that AZD9150 decreased the expression of STAT3 and exhibited prominent antitumor effects in several preclinical cancer models of lymphoma and LC. In a phase I clinical trial (NCT01563302) for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DL-BCL) AZD9150 was well tolerated and exhibited efficacy in a subset of heavily pre-treated patients . Currently, combination studies of AZD9150 with immune checkpoint inhibitors are in progress. Therapeutic silencing of STAT3 can also be achieved by targeting STAT3 binding to target sites. CS3D is a cyclic 15-mer oligonucleotides decoy corresponding to the response element of STAT3 target genes . The CS3D decoy was tested on EGFR inhibitor-resistant NSCLC cells and resulted in the downregulation of STAT3 targeted c-MYC gene at mRNA and protein levels. Further, CS3D inhibited cell proliferation, colonization and, increases apoptosis in vitro, and reduced tumor growth along with c-MYC expression in vivo . Thus, targeting of STAT3 with RNA-based oligonucleotides is a promising alternative for small molecules chemical inhibitors to develop effective therapies for LC.
High expression of Bcl2 and Akt1 promotes the growth, proliferation, and apoptotic evasion in LC, and Bcl2 is a potential therapeutic target for both NSCLC and SCLC [221,222,223]. G3139 and RX-0201 are ASOs that target Bcl2 and Akt-1, respectively, but have exhibited limited efficacy in clinical trials due to inadequate delivery. These ASOs were modified using the ‘Gapmer’ strategy and 2'-O-methyl modifications at 5' and 3' ends. To enhance the targeting and delivery, cancer cell-specific lipid nanoparticles (conjugated with transferrin receptor-targeting T7 peptide) were synthesized with these modified ASOs . The ASO co-loaded nanoparticles exhibited enhanced colloidal stability, high encapsulation with smaller particle size, and higher cellular uptake. The T7-ASO-lipid nanoparticles decreased the expression of Bcl2 and Akt-1in LC cell lines, exhibited superior antitumor effects, and improved the overall survival (OS) in LC xenograft bearing mice . The in vitro activity of gapmer based G3139 ASO lipid nanoparticles for Bcl2 was also evaluated . The G3139-GAP (with 2'-O-methyl nucleotides) was incorporated into DOTAP/egg PC/cholesterol/Tween 80 lipid nanoparticles, and anticancer efficacy was studied in A549 cells and xenograft mouse models. These gapmer based ASOs lipid nanoparticles reduced the Bcl2 expression at mRNA as well as protein level in cell lines and tumors, and inhibited tumor growth, and improved OS .
Self-renewing tumor-initiating cells (TICs) or cancer stem cells mainly contribute towards tumor initiation, recurrence, and treatment resistance [226,227,228]. The overexpression and activity of glycine decarboxylase (GLDC) maintain TICs and is possibly responsible for tumorigenesis of NSCLC . GLDC is a key member of the glycine and serine metabolic pathway, regulating pyrimidine metabolism and cancer cell proliferation. No therapeutic molecule is available for GLDC; hence ASOs could be a novel strategy to downregulate GLDC . The splice-modulating steric-block ASOs were designed to induce exon-skipping to disrupt the open reading frame of GLDC encoding transcripts and induce nonsense-mediated degradation. These GLDC steric blocks inhibited cell proliferation and colonization of LC cell lines, and NSCLC TICs derived tumor-spheres. The candidate GLDC ASOs decreased the tumor growth of TICs derived xenografts in mice . Overall, these reports suggested that ASOs hold strong promise to design and develop RNA-based therapeutic regimens for LC.
RNAi therapies in LC
RNAi moieties (siRNAs and miRNAs) effectively silence target genes by inducing mRNA degradation or inhibiting the binding sites of translational machinery (Figs. 1 & 3) [8, 38]. Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) is an important drug target in LC that regulates cancer progression, metastasis, metabolism, and tumor immunity [231,232,233,234]. However, the available COX-2 inhibitors have failed to show clinical efficacy. Instead of direct COX-2 inhibition, knockdown of delta-5-desaturase (D5D) offers a unique approach that limits the formation of arachidonic acid (a substrate for COX-2) and promotes the peroxidation of dihomo-γ-linolenic acid leading the production of 8-hydroxyoctanoic acid (8-HOA) . Pang et al. incorporated the siRNA of D5D with epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) aptamers into three-way junction RNA nanoparticles that exhibited target specific accumulation, D5D knockdown, and formation of 8-HOA in lung cancer cell lines and mouse models . These D5D siRNA-loaded nanoparticles inhibited the proliferation of lung cancer cells and induce apoptosis by suppressing YAP1/TAZ axis.
Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNPs) and lncRNAs play a prominent role in LC [237,238,239]. Analysis of LC risk-associated SNPs and lncRNAs, identified an oxidative stress-responsive serine-rich 1 antisense RNA1 (OSER-AS1) as a prognostic biomarker and therapeutic target . Downregulation of OSER1-AS1 in tumor tissues was associated with poor OS in NSCLC patients. Myc represses the promoter of OSER-AS1, which is also targeted by RNA binding protein ELAVL (embryonic lethal, abnormal vision, Drosophila)-like 1 (ELAVL1) and hsa-miR-17-5p at the 3'-end. OSER1-AS1 acted as a decoy for ELAVL1 and inhibited its interaction with target mRNA. Treatment with OSER1-AS1 resulted in the inhibition of growth and metastasis of xenograft LC tumors.
Two independent studies performed on lncRNA nicotinamide nucleotide transhydrogenase-antisense RNA1 (NNT-AS1) showed that overexpression of NNT-AS1 is correlated with poor prognosis of NSCLC [241, 242]. NNT-AS1 upregulation decreases miR-22 by sponging and is associated with increased expression of FOXM1 and YAP-1. Knockdown of NNT-AS1 attenuates cell proliferation, invasion, migration, induces apoptosis, and suppresses in vivo tumor growth. Further, NNT-AS1 contributes to drug resistance in NSCLC through MAPK-slug signaling . Thus, NNT-AS1 is a potential RNA-based therapeutic target and prognostic marker for NSCLC. Wanjun et al., reported the analysis of non-canonical small non-coding RNAs (sncRNAs) using peripheral blood mononuclear cells of human and identify a unique ‘disease RNA code’ named TRY-RNA signature composed of distinct tRNA-derived small RNAs (tsRNAs), rRNA-derived small RNAs (rsRNAs), and YRNA-derived small RNAs (ysRNAs) . This TRY-RNA signature helps to differentiate between LC and pulmonary tuberculosis, and thus possess diagnostic implications for LC screening . A recent study demonstrated the potential of PD-L1 siRNA encapsulated gold nanoparticles for the imaging and treatment of LC . These nanoparticles downregulate the expression of PD-L1 in NSCLC cell lines and xenograft studies and serve as photothermal agents for LC photothermal therapy . Thus, it demonstrates the theranostic application of siRNAs in LC when combined with suitable photothermal agent. KDM3A is lysine-specific demethylase that increases the expression of DCLK1 by reducing the methylation of H3K9me2. It was recently demonstrated that bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles (BMSC-EV) encapsulated let-7i miRNA decreases LC growth by suppressing the KDM3A-DCLK1-FXYD3 axis . This study established KDM3A is a direct target of let-7i, and the high expression of KDM3A and DCLK1 is associated with reduced expression of let-7i. In vivo BMSC-EV derived let-7i downregulated the KDM3A, and decreased tumor growth .
In addition, extracellular miRNAs also serve as diagnostic biomarkers for LC . A study involving NSCLC patients, patients with benign nodules, and healthy controls demonstrated the utility of miR-520c-3p and miR-1274b in the identification of NSCLC risk factors . The panel of these two-miRNA has the potential to differentiate between NSCLC and benign nodules and suggested the importance of extracellular miRNAs for diagnostic utilization in NSCLC . Similarly, another recent study demonstrated the clinical significance of circulating/serum exosomal miR-let-7e as a biomarker for NSCLC metastasis . Analysis of serum exosomes and tumor tissues from NSCLC patients demonstrated that miR-let-7e was low, and suppressor of variegation 3-9 homolog 2 (SUV39H2) was high in NSCLC tissues and was associated with low OS. The ectopic overexpression of miR-let-7e or treatment with serum-derived exosomes (miR-let-7e is high in serum-derived exosomes) decreased cell viability, migration, invasion, and delayed in vivo tumor growth by targeting the SUV39H2-LSD1-CDH1 axis .
The therapeutic utility of miRNAs is also being investigated for SCLC. For example, low expression of miRNA-195 has been observed in SCLC . Low miRNA-195 and high Rap2C were associated with low OS in SCLC patients. Overexpression of miRNA-195 decreased the proliferation of SCLC cells through Bax upregulation and Bcl2 downregulation. Further, this study identified the binding site for miRNA-195 in the Rap2C mRNA. Overexpression of miRNA-195 in SCLC cell lines inhibited the activation of the MAPK pathway by decreasing the expression of Rap2C and inducing apoptosis .
Combination of small RNAs with chemotherapy in LC
Small RNA therapies substantially affect the growth of LC, and thus targeted RNA combination therapies may be used to improve therapeutic response. Several efforts have been made to improve the utilization and formulations of RNA-based cancer therapeutics, such as the use of nanoparticles as a delivery vehicle [158, 251]. Interestingly, the nanoparticles-based delivery systems not only protect the small molecule RNAs from degradation but also facilitate the evaluation of different combinational approaches to develop effective LC therapies. Combination of chemotherapy with anti-angiogenesis therapies is an attractive approach against NSCLC [252, 253]. Integration of these two different targeting strategies (anti-angiogenesis and chemotherapy) is a promising approach to simultaneously target the tumor vasculature and tumor cells. Two independent studies reported the utility of combining VEGF siRNA with two different chemotherapeutic drugs [252, 253]. Zhang et al reported the efficacy of coupling VEGF siRNA with gemcitabine using lipid-calcium-phosphate nanoparticles that possess cell-specific targeting . Compared to gemcitabine or VEGF siRNA alone, systemic administration of co-targeting nanoparticles resulted in improved response in subcutaneous as well as orthotopic mouse models of NSCLC. The combination of VEGF siRNA and a gemcitabine-induced significant decrease in tumor growth and tumor microvessel density with minimal in-vivo toxicity . Similarly, novel nanoparticles containing tripeptide lipids, sucrose laurate, folate-PEG2000-DSPE were used to encapsulate paclitaxel and VEGF siRNA . These nanoparticles showed substantial specificity and anti-tumor activities in cell lines and mouse models of LC. In addition, these formulations show improved bioavailability and led to a decrease in the effective therapy dose, thereby reducing toxicity .
KRAS is the most common oncogenic mutation in patients with NSCLC and is associated with recurrence and poor survival [3, 254]. KRAS mutations are leading to the constitutive activation of the KRAS, which suggested the potential of mutant K-ras inhibition, may for NSCLC treatment . The approach combining siRNA and miRNA provides innovative therapeutic opportunities to combat oncogenic KRAS and other oncogenic mutations in LC simultaneously. The lipid-based polymeric nanoparticle containing the siRNA for knocking-down oncogenic KRAS and overexpressing miR-34a (p53-regulated tumor suppressor miRNA) has shown promising therapeutic effects in lung cancer . Additionally, this dual NP (miR-34a/siKras) in combination with cisplatin exhibited greater efficacy as compared to cisplatin alone, suggesting that miR-34a/siKras small RNA therapy can be combined with conventional chemotherapeutic approaches to improve LC therapy . Furthermore, anti-mutant KRAS siRNA-loaded hybrid nanoparticles (AKSLHNs) have been shown to target the KRAS and inhibit the metastasis in a mouse model of lung cancer .
Similarly, most of the anti-EGFR therapies aim to target the EGFR mutations, and the status of the EGFR mutation determines the fate of such treatments [17, 257, 258]. In combination with TK inhibitors, siEGFR induced apoptosis and reduced NSCLC cell growth . Recently, silencing of EGFR-TKs by a siRNA pool and simultaneously delivering paclitaxel by using tumor-targeted nanostructured lipid carriers resulted in enhanced tissue distribution and anticancer effects compared with monotherapy or non-targeted therapy . Studies have indicated that miRNAs contribute to the resistance of TK inhibitor in EGFR mutated NSCLC tumors. Expression of miR-146b-5p was higher in the pleural discharge of treatment naïve patients as compared to EGFR TK inhibitor-resistant patients. Overexpression of miR-146-5p in the resistant cells enhanced their sensitivity to EGFR TK inhibitors. Similar observations were noticed in osimertinib resistant primary cancer cells in both EGFR-dependent and independent manner . Mechanistically, miR-146b-5p targets interleukin 1 receptor-associated kinase 1 (IRAK1) by downregulating NF-κB and related cytokine production (IL-6 and IL-8). Thus, miR-146b-5p has the potential to target IRAK1/NF-κB signaling, regulating EGFR TK inhibitor resistance, and may help combat resistance associated with TK inhibitors . MicroRNA-506 (miR-506) functions as a tumor suppressor in multiple cancers, including LC [262,263,264]. Haque et al. reported downregulation of miR-506-3p and Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) signaling pathway in erlotinib resistant NSCLC cell lines . Overexpression of miR-506-3p inhibited SHH signaling pathway and modulated epithelial to mesenchymal transition . This study identified the SHH pathway as a novel therapeutic target of miR-506-3p in EGFR TK inhibitor-resistant EGFR mutated LC cell lines.
A decreased expression of miR-3180-3p was noticed in NSCLC cell lines and tumor tissues . Exosome-mediated delivery of miR-3180-3p decreased the proliferation and metastasis of NSCLC cells through forkhead box P4 (FOXP4). FOXP4 is an important target for EGFR mutated LC and is involved in the regulation of pulmonary gene expression. This suggests a possibility of a miRNA-mediated targeting approach for FOXP4 associated pathways as a potential treatment option in LC [267, 268]. miR-139-5p was shown to induce cisplatin sensitization of NSCLC cells . The expression of miR-139-5p was downregulated in NSCLC compared to adjacent normal tissue, and reduced expression was associated with cisplatin resistance. Overexpression of miR-139-5p resulted in enhanced sensitivity to cisplatin, inhibited cell proliferation, and induced apoptosis by modulating the Homeobox protein Hox B2 (HOXB2) and PI3K-AKT-caspase-3 axis .
As discussed in ASOs section, VEGF is a key mediator of angiogenesis in most human tumors and is associated with tumor relapse, metastasis, and poor prognosis of NSCLC [270, 271]. Several targeted therapies for VEGF and VEGF receptor (VEGFR), including antibodies and small molecule inhibitors, have been evaluated in NSCLC. Bevacizumab is a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody against VEGF-A that has been approved as first-line therapy for unresectable, recurrent, locally advanced, or metastatic NSCLC . Although combining the bevacizumab with chemotherapy improved the overall survival in NSCLC, VEGF inhibitors have a short half-life and numerous side effects [273,274,275,276]. Recently, targeting of tumor angiogenesis via siVEGF was shown to be an effective strategy in metastatic NSCLC . Further, co-administration of siVEGF and etoposide using cationic liposomes inhibited tumor growth and metastasis more effectively than monotherapy . Further, ASO against LINC00173.v1 reduced the growth of lung squamous cell carcinoma and enhanced the sensitivity to cisplatin in vivo via modulating the VEGFA expression (for details, see ASO section) . Ribonucleotide reductase large subunit (RRM1) is a key enzyme that plays a part in DNA synthesis, as it is required for deoxyribonucleotide synthesis, and overexpression of RRM1 is associated with LC [279, 280]. Adenoviral vector-based short hairpin siRNA targeting the RRM1 gene (Ad-shRRM1)-mediated inhibition of RRM1 augmented the sensitivity to gemcitabine, and combination treatment with Ad-shRRM1 and GEM exerted significantly better inhibitory effects in LC compared to monotherapy .
Bcl-2 is a well-known oncogene, is highly expressed in the majority of SCLC, and contributes to chemotherapeutic resistance . G3139, a Bcl-2 ASO, along with paclitaxel was well-tolerated in chemo-refractory SCLC patients . Further, G3139, in combination with carboplatin and etoposide showed promising results in SCLC patients . However, a randomized phase II Study for Bcl-2 ASOs (Oblimersen) in combination with carboplatin and etoposide did not improve the clinical outcome in advanced-stage SCLC patients . Another oligonucleotide against telomerase (Imetelstat) failed to improve the progression-free survival in advanced NSCLC patients . Clusterin (Apolipoprotein J) encodes a chaperone protein that is highly overexpressed in NSCLC patients . A Phase I study of custirsen (OGX-011), a second-generation ASO to clusterin combined with cisplatin and gemcitabine, showed a promising response in patients with stage IIB/IV NSCLC .
AXL is overexpressed in tumor tissue of NSCLC patients and associated with poor survival . Growth arrest-specific protein 6 (GAS6) is a high-affinity ligand of AXL. Gas6/AXL signaling pathway is associated with tumor growth, metastasis, invasion, angiogenesis, drug resistance, and immune regulation, making AXL a potential target for several cancer therapies, including NSCLC [290,291,292,293]. Recently a combination of an EGFR targeting antibody (Cetuximab)-functionalized gelatin nanoparticle (GAb) and covalently conjugated AXL siRNA containing nanoconstruct (GAbsiAXL) showed higher potential for intercellular internalization, improved the siRNA stability, and increased the expression of tumor suppressor P53 in drug-resistant NSCLC cells . Further, the combination of EGFR inhibitor (erlotinib) and GAbsiAXL synergistically enhanced apoptosis and inhibited cancer cell migration, demonstrating that RNA-based inhibition of AXL in the combination of chemotherapies may be beneficial in NSCLC .
Survivin is overexpressed in many cancers and regulates the several pathways required for cancer stem cells and tumor maintenance . Thus, it is an exceptionally attractive target for cancer therapeutics . A lipid-modified platinum-derivative-based nanoparticle delivery system for survivin siRNA in combination with cisplatin exhibited improved therapeutic efficacy in chemo-resistant LC model, suggesting that RNA therapeutics against survivin is a promising approach . The polyglutamate-derived brush polymer-based silencing of survivin using si-RNA (PPGS/si-survivin polyplex) combined with cisplatin exhibited synergistic cytotoxic effects on drug-resistant LC cells . Further, a pH based polyglutamate brush polymer (DMA-mPEG-b-PG-g-spermine, DPPGS) containing the dual siRNAs against MDR1 (siMDR1) and survivin (si-Survivin) enhanced sensitivity to the cisplatin. This combination appears to be a promising approach for overcoming multi-drug resistant (MDR) NSCLC . Interestingly, survivin is also being investigated as a potential candidate for immunotherapy and vaccine development .
Aprinocarsen, a first-generation ASO, is a phosphorothioate oligonucleotide that targets human PKC-α mRNA and inhibits PKC-α expression [300,301,302]. In NSCLC, aprinocarsen has been extensively investigated as a single anticancer agent or in combination with various chemotherapeutic agents. In combination with chemotherapy, aprinocarsen showed promising activity in early phase studies, while higher toxicity was reported in phase III trials (Table 1) [300, 301]. Similarly, in SCLC, oblimersen failed to show benefit, either alone or in combination with chemotherapy (Table 1) . The outcome of a phase II clinical trial, evaluating the efficacy of carboplatin and pemetrexed plus either apatorsen, a Hsp27 mRNA targeting ASO, or placebo showed no additional toxicity; however, no improvement was observed in treatment naïve patients with metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC .
Besides therapy and diagnosis, miRNAs also play a role in immunotherapy resistance . Anti-PD1 immunotherapy, in combination with first-line chemotherapy, improves the overall outcomes of LC; however, long-term benefits of this regimen are frequently compromised due to resistance to anti-PD1 [308,309,310]. Guyon et al. recently developed a cellular model consisting of T-cell and cell lines of different cancers (glioblastoma, lung adenocarcinoma, breast cancer, and ovarian carcinoma) . They used longitudinal blood samples from anti-PD1 treated patients and LC mouse model and demonstrated the enrichment of exosomal miRNA-4315 following anti-PD1 exposure to T-cells. The exposure of cancer cell lines to exosomal miRNA-4315 induced apoptosis resistance to chemotherapy via inhibition of Bim (a pro-apoptotic protein) expression. The introduction of ABT263 (a BH3 mimetic) bypassed this resistance. The analysis of patient blood samples suggested that miRNA-4315 and cytochrome-c levels help define the timeline to add ABT263 to enhance cell death and overcome anti-PD1 resistance . This study established the role of exosomal miRNA-4315 for the stratification of LC patients developing anti-PD1 resistance and provide an alternative therapeutic option to utilize miRNAs for LC to modulate immunotherapy.
mRNA vaccines in LC
The primary objective of cancer vaccines is to elicit or boost cancer-specific immunity. Tumor antigens trigger cancer immune response, and identification and formulation of potential tumor antigens is a challenging task . In the context of antigen formulation, mRNA-based approaches provide a promising way to design and synthesize antigens using intracellular machinery of the host/patient [37, 51]. DCs present tumor antigenic peptides to cognate T-cell receptors (TCRs) and induce tumor immunity and immunological memory . The main targets of cancer vaccines include tumor-associated antigens (TAA) and cancer neoantigens. The atypically expressed proteins of tumors such as overexpression, different subcellular localization, tumor specific expression (which are normally sequestered in immune-privileged sites or express during certain differentiation stages) compared to normal tissues constitutes TAA. The recent success of immune checkpoint blockade and initial success of RNA-vaccine in Melanoma renewed the interest of researchers in RNA-based cancer vaccines [37, 51, 157, 312]. RNA-based vaccines have emerged as a promising substitute for conventional vaccines. The recent interim outcomes of a multicenter, open-label, dose-escalation phase 1 clinical trial (NCT02410733) of an intravenously administered liposomal RNA (RNA-LPX) vaccine initiated by Shahin et al., demonstrated the immunogenic potential of this mRNA-based vaccine in melanoma . The cancer vaccine field is in the developing phase, and only a few studies are available, particularly for LC. A clinical trial involving patients with stage IV NSCLC showed the benefits of immunotherapy consisting of protamine-protected, sequence-optimized mRNA (BI1361849 or CV9202) encoding six NSCLC-associated antigens, including New York Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma-1 (NY-ESO-1), MAGE-C1, MAGE-C2, survivin, 5T4, and Mucin-1), to induce targeted immune responses in combination with local radiation treatment . The treatment was well-tolerated with minor side effects. BI1361849 increased antigen-specific immune responses in most patients, whereby antigen-specific antibody levels and functional T cells were increased by 80% and 40% of patients, respectively, supporting further clinical investigation . Similarly, another phase I/IIa study also demonstrated that CV9201 was well-tolerated and enhanced immune response in stage IIIB/IV NSCLC patients . These results suggest the importance of mRNA-based immunotherapy in combinations with immune checkpoint inhibitors in NSCLC. Similarly, an ongoing phase I/II study (NCT03164772) is evaluating the efficacy and safety of mRNA Vaccine (BI 1361849) in the combination of checkpoint inhibitors, anti-PD-L1 (durvalumab), and anti-CTLA-4 (tremelimumab) for the treatment of NSCLC.
Conclusion and future perspective of RNA therapeutics
The utilization of RNA as a drug is a fundamentally novel approach to conventional small molecule inhibitors. The idea to translate RNA oligonucleotides' inhibition mechanism into clinics almost took four decades to become a reality. The recent FDA approvals of Givosiran, mRNA-1273-P301 (Moderna), and BNT162b1 (Pfizer-BioNTech) COVID-19 Vaccine [62, 315,316,317], have ushered the wave of RNAi or mRNA-based therapies into the mainstream of drug development. The outcomes of RNA-based treatments also open a novel direction of alternative therapeutic strategies to explore RNA moieties for cancer therapy development. The advances in the understanding of siRNAs/miRNAs are expected to facilitate the development of more effective ‘combinational approaches’ through multi-targeting properties of these small RNAs to treat cancer, as it is a multi-gene-associated problem. The potential of RNA therapies in precision genetics, like for the treatment of hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis  and acute intermittent porphyria , has raised enthusiasm for similar applications in cancer therapies.
The new generation ASOs with GalNAc conjugation (Givosiran) showed enhanced liver-specific delivery and more than twenty-fold enhanced potency for RNase H1 dependent ASOs [44, 317], suggesting a possibility to develop anticancer molecules to deal with organ-specific metastases of LC or other cancers. The success of targeted delivery and improved potency of ASOs provide a strong motive to identify ligands/conjugates that can enhance the potency and targeting in other tissues. Targeting is a major problem in cancer drug development, so such modifications also provide a window to further optimize the targeting of anticancer RNA drugs. However, RNA therapies can potentially reach the ‘golden-age’ in some diseases, but before we reach the goal, there are several challenges ahead, especially for cancer research. Some of the major pitfalls are targeted delivery, the stability of chemically synthesized RNAs compared to in-vitro/in-vivo transcribed RNAs, modulation of immune responses, and efficacy improvement. The field of RNA nucleoside modifications or epitranscriptomics is also under-investigated, including the identification of oligonucleotides that can target RNA modifications and the associated molecular pathways for the development of cancer therapies. Nevertheless, some of the ASOs or small RNAs did not proceed to the clinics, still putting forward the potential and implications of the strategy to further modify and optimize the RNA moieties for the development of effective therapies for LC. The outcomes of the studies also demonstrated the application and potential of combining chemotherapeutic drugs and RNAi tools or suggested the possibilities of coupling multiple antisense molecules into a single nanoformulation, aiming to expand the efficacies of LC therapies.
The recent outcomes of liposomal encapsulated mRNA-based tumor vaccines have been promising in melanoma (Lipo-MERIT trial, ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02410733) . This vaccine provides durable antigen-specific cytotoxic T-cell immune response alone or in checkpoint inhibitor (PD1) treated patients and provided vital evidence for the utilization of non-mutated commonly shared tumor antigens for the development of cancer vaccines. This initial success has raised hopes for cancer vaccine development, and the focus now is to identify tumor-associated antigens that can serve as potential antigenic targets for the tumors possessing high mutational burdens like NSCLC and SCLC.
Availability of data and materials
Not applicable, all information in this review can be found in the reference list.
Non-small cell lung cancer
small cell lung cancer
Epidermal growth factor receptor
Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog
Adoptive cell transfer
Delta-like protein 3
Vascular endothelial growth factor
- RNase H1:
Small interfering RNA
Interleukin 1 receptor associated kinase 1
ADP-ribosylation factor like 4C
Small hairpin RNAs
RNA-induced silencing complex
Lysine demethylase 3A
Doublecortin-like kinase 1
FXYD domain-containing ion transport regulator 3
Homeobox protein Hox B2
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;70:7–30. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21590.
Wang S, Du M, Zhang J, Xu W, Yuan Q, Li M, Wang J, Zhu H, Wang Y, Wang C, et al. Tumor evolutionary trajectories during the acquisition of invasiveness in early stage lung adenocarcinoma. Nat Commun. 2020;11:6083. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19855-x.
Zappa C, Mousa SA. Non-small cell lung cancer: current treatment and future advances. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2016;5:288–300. https://doi.org/10.21037/tlcr.2016.06.07.
Molina JR, Yang P, Cassivi SD, Schild SE, Adjei AA. Non-small cell lung cancer: epidemiology, risk factors, treatment, and survivorship. Mayo Clin Proc. 2008;83:584–94. https://doi.org/10.4065/83.5.584.
Lantuejoul S, Fernandez-Cuesta L, Damiola F, Girard N, McLeer A. New molecular classification of large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma and small cell lung carcinoma with potential therapeutic impacts. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2020;9:2233–44. https://doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-20-269.
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019;69:7–34. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21551.
Rudin CM, Poirier JT, Byers LA, Dive C, Dowlati A, George J, Heymach JV, Johnson JE, Lehman JM, MacPherson D, et al. Molecular subtypes of small cell lung cancer: a synthesis of human and mouse model data. Nat Rev Cancer. 2019;19:289–97. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41568-019-0133-9.
Kumar V, Yadavilli S, Kannan R. A review on RNAi therapy for NSCLC: Opportunities and challenges. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol. 2020:e1677. https://doi.org/10.1002/wnan.1677.
van Meerbeeck JP, Fennell DA, De Ruysscher DK. Small-cell lung cancer. Lancet. 2011;378:1741–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60165-7.
Sabari JK, Lok BH, Laird JH, Poirier JT, Rudin CM. Unravelling the biology of SCLC: implications for therapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2017;14:549–61. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.71.
Alanazi A, Yunusa I, Elenizi K, Alzarea AI. Efficacy and safety of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer harboring epidermal growth factor receptor mutation: a network meta-analysis. Lung Cancer Manag. 2020;10:LMT43. https://doi.org/10.2217/lmt-2020-0011.
Sun X, Xu S, Yang Z, Zheng P, Zhu W. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer: a patent review (2014-present). Expert Opin Ther Pat. 2020:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/13543776.2021.1860210.
Harrison PT, Vyse S, Huang PH. Rare epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in non-small cell lung cancer. Semin Cancer Biol. 2020;61:167–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcancer.2019.09.015.
Holderfield M. Efforts to Develop KRAS Inhibitors. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2018;8. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a031864.
Yang H, Liang SQ, Schmid RA, Peng RW. New Horizons in KRAS-Mutant Lung Cancer: Dawn After Darkness. Front Oncol. 2019;9:953. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.00953.
Gandhi L, Garassino MC. Pembrolizumab plus Chemotherapy in Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:e18. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc1808567.
Denis MG, Bennouna J. Osimertinib for Front-Line Treatment of Locally Advanced or Metastatic EGFR-Mutant NSCLC Patients: Efficacy, Acquired Resistance and Perspectives for Subsequent Treatments. Cancer Manag Res. 2020;12:12593–602. https://doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S218751.
Passaro A, Mok T, Peters S, Popat S, Ahn MJ, de Marinis F. Recent Advances on the Role of EGFR TKIs in the Management of NSCLC with Uncommon, non-exon 20 insertion EGFR Mutations. J Thorac Oncol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2020.12.002.
Khan P, Siddiqui JA, Maurya SK, Lakshmanan I, Jain M, Ganti AK, Salgia R, Batra SK, Nasser MW. Epigenetic landscape of small cell lung cancer: small image of a giant recalcitrant disease. Semin Cancer Biol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcancer.2020.11.006.
Skoulidis F, Goldberg ME, Greenawalt DM, Hellmann MD, Awad MM, Gainor JF, Schrock AB, Hartmaier RJ, Trabucco SE, Gay L, et al. STK11/LKB1 Mutations and PD-1 Inhibitor Resistance in KRAS-Mutant Lung Adenocarcinoma. Cancer Discov. 2018;8:822–35. https://doi.org/10.1158/2159-8290.CD-18-0099.
Auvray M, Auclin E, Barthelemy P, Bono P, Kellokumpu-Lehtinen P, Gross-Goupil M, De Velasco G, Powles T, Mouillet G, Vano YA, et al: Second-line targeted therapies after nivolumab-ipilimumab failure in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Eur J Cancer 2019, 108:33-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2018.11.031
Tokaca N, Wotherspoon A, Nicholson AG, Fotiadis N, Thompson L, Popat S. Lack of response to nivolumab in a patient with EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer adenocarcinoma sub-type transformed to small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2017;111:65–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2017.07.012.
Hellmann MD, Callahan MK, Awad MM, Calvo E, Ascierto PA, Atmaca A, Rizvi NA, Hirsch FR, Selvaggi G, Szustakowski JD, et al. Tumor Mutational Burden and Efficacy of Nivolumab Monotherapy and in Combination with Ipilimumab in Small-Cell Lung Cancer. Cancer Cell. 2018;33:853–61 e854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccell.2018.04.001.
Mansoori B, Mohammadi A, Davudian S, Shirjang S, Baradaran B. The Different Mechanisms of Cancer Drug Resistance: A Brief Review. Adv Pharm Bull. 2017;7:339–48. https://doi.org/10.15171/apb.2017.041.
Harrison PT, Huang PH. Exploiting vulnerabilities in cancer signalling networks to combat targeted therapy resistance. Essays Biochem. 2018;62:583–93. https://doi.org/10.1042/EBC20180016.
Shah K, Rawal RM. Genetic and Epigenetic Modulation of Drug Resistance in Cancer: Challenges and Opportunities. Curr Drug Metab. 2019;20:1114–31. https://doi.org/10.2174/1389200221666200103111539.
Bukowski K, Kciuk M, Kontek R. Mechanisms of Multidrug Resistance in Cancer Chemotherapy. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21093233.
Vasan N, Baselga J, Hyman DM. A view on drug resistance in cancer. Nature. 2019;575:299–309. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1730-1.
Chen M, Wang L, Wang F, Li F, Xia W, Gu H, Chen Y. Quick synthesis of a novel combinatorial delivery system of siRNA and doxorubicin for a synergistic anticancer effect. Int J Nanomed. 2019;14:3557–69. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S198511.
Babu A, Munshi A, Ramesh R. Combinatorial therapeutic approaches with RNAi and anticancer drugs using nanodrug delivery systems. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2017;43:1391–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/03639045.2017.1313861.
Das M, Musetti S, Huang L. RNA Interference-Based Cancer Drugs: The Roadblocks, and the "Delivery" of the Promise. Nucleic Acid Ther. 2019;29:61–6. https://doi.org/10.1089/nat.2018.0762.
Liu S, Zang H, Zheng H, Wang W, Wen Q, Zhan Y, Yang Y, Ning Y, Wang H. Fan S: miR-4634 augments the anti-tumor effects of RAD001 and associates well with clinical prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer. Sci Rep. 2020;10:13079. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70157-0.
Xue W, Dahlman JE, Tammela T, Khan OF, Sood S, Dave A, Cai W, Chirino LM, Yang GR, Bronson R, et al. Small RNA combination therapy for lung cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111:E3553–61. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1412686111.
Gu L, Deng ZJ, Roy S, Hammond PT. A Combination RNAi-Chemotherapy Layer-by-Layer Nanoparticle for Systemic Targeting of KRAS/P53 with Cisplatin to Treat Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23:7312–23. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-2186.
Juliano RL. Addressing cancer signal transduction pathways with antisense and siRNA oligonucleotides. NAR Cancer. 2020;2:zcaa025. https://doi.org/10.1093/narcan/zcaa025.
Kim JW, Marquez CP, Kostyrko K, Koehne AL, Marini K, Simpson DR, Lee AG, Leung SG, Sayles LC, Shrager J, et al. Antitumor activity of an engineered decoy receptor targeting CLCF1-CNTFR signaling in lung adenocarcinoma. Nat Med. 2019;25:1783–95. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-019-0612-2.
Pastor F, Berraondo P, Etxeberria I, Frederick J, Sahin U, Gilboa E, Melero I. An RNA toolbox for cancer immunotherapy. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2018;17:751–67. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd.2018.132.
Liang X, Li D, Leng S, Zhu X. RNA-based pharmacotherapy for tumors: From bench to clinic and back. Biomed Pharmacother. 2020;125:109997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2020.109997.
Ligtenberg MA, Pico de Coana Y, Shmushkovich T, Yoshimoto Y, Truxova I, Yang Y, Betancur-Boissel M, Eliseev AV, Wolfson AD, Kiessling R. Self-Delivering RNAi Targeting PD-1 Improves Tumor-Specific T Cell Functionality for Adoptive Cell Therapy of Malignant Melanoma. Mol Ther. 2018;26:1482–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymthe.2018.04.015.
Tan S, Li D, Zhu X. Cancer immunotherapy: Pros, cons and beyond. Biomed Pharmacother. 2020;124:109821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2020.109821.
Ajina R, Zahavi DJ, Zhang YW, Weiner LM. Overcoming malignant cell-based mechanisms of resistance to immune checkpoint blockade antibodies. Semin Cancer Biol. 2020;65:28–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcancer.2019.12.005.
Porto EM, Komor AC, Slaymaker IM, Yeo GW. Base editing: advances and therapeutic opportunities. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41573-020-0084-6.
Wang F, Zuroske T, Watts JK. RNA therapeutics on the rise. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2020;19:441–2. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41573-020-00078-0.
Bennett CF. Therapeutic Antisense Oligonucleotides Are Coming of Age. Annu Rev Med. 2019;70:307–21. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-med-041217-010829.
Goff LA, Rinn JL. Linking RNA biology to lncRNAs. Genome Res. 2015;25:1456–65. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.191122.115.
Bartel DP. Metazoan MicroRNAs. Cell. 2018;173:20–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2018.03.006.
Zhang X, Xie K, Zhou H, Wu Y, Li C, Liu Y, Liu Z, Xu Q, Liu S, Xiao D, Tao Y. Role of non-coding RNAs and RNA modifiers in cancer therapy resistance. Mol Cancer. 2020;19:47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12943-020-01171-z.
Jin D, Guo J, Wu Y, Yang L, Wang X, Du J, Dai J, Chen W, Gong K, Miao S, et al. m (6) A demethylase ALKBH5 inhibits tumor growth and metastasis by reducing YTHDFs-mediated YAP expression and inhibiting miR-107/LATS2-mediated YAP activity in NSCLC. Mol Cancer. 2020;19:40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12943-020-01161-1.
Batra R, Nelles DA, Roth DM, Krach F, Nutter CA, Tadokoro T, Thomas JD, Sznajder LJ, Blue SM, Gutierrez HL, et al. The sustained expression of Cas9 targeting toxic RNAs reverses disease phenotypes in mouse models of myotonic dystrophy type 1. Nat Biomed Eng. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-020-00607-7.
Rupaimoole R, Slack FJ. MicroRNA therapeutics: towards a new era for the management of cancer and other diseases. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2017;16:203–22. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd.2016.246.
Sahin U, Oehm P, Derhovanessian E, Jabulowsky RA, Vormehr M, Gold M, Maurus D, Schwarck-Kokarakis D, Kuhn AN, Omokoko T, et al. An RNA vaccine drives immunity in checkpoint-inhibitor-treated melanoma. Nature. 2020;585:107–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2537-9.
Liang W, Lin Z, Du C, Qiu D, Zhang Q. mRNA modification orchestrates cancer stem cell fate decisions. Mol Cancer. 2020;19:38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12943-020-01166-w.
Akdeli N, Riemann K, Westphal J, Hess J, Siffert W, Bachmann HS. A 3'UTR polymorphism modulates mRNA stability of the oncogene and drug target Polo-like Kinase 1. Mol Cancer. 2014;13:87. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-4598-13-87.
Skoulidis F, Heymach JV. Co-occurring genomic alterations in non-small-cell lung cancer biology and therapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2019;19:495–509. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41568-019-0179-8.
Wang Y, Li J, Zhou Y, Cao S, Ling X, Zhang Y, Nie W, Zhong H. Tumor genomics and response to chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer with exon 20 insertion epidermal growth factor receptor mutations. Ann Transl Med. 2020;8:1297. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-6172.
George J, Lim JS, Jang SJ, Cun Y, Ozretic L, Kong G, Leenders F, Lu X, Fernandez-Cuesta L, Bosco G, et al. Comprehensive genomic profiles of small cell lung cancer. Nature. 2015;524:47–53. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14664.
Xu CR, Zhong WZ, Zhou Q, Zhang XC, Yang JJ, Wu YL. Heterogeneity of the resistance to gefitinib treatment in a non-small cell lung cancer patient with active epidermal growth factor receptor mutation. Thorac Cancer. 2017;8:51–3. https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.12382.
Roberts TC, Langer R, Wood MJA. Advances in oligonucleotide drug delivery. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2020;19:673–94. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41573-020-0075-7.
Crooke ST, Witztum JL, Bennett CF, Baker BF. RNA-Targeted Therapeutics. Cell Metab. 2019;29:501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2019.01.001.
Hewitt SL, Bai A, Bailey D, Ichikawa K, Zielinski J, Karp R, Apte A, Arnold K, Zacharek SJ, Iliou MS, et al. Durable anticancer immunity from intratumoral administration of IL-23, IL-36gamma, and OX40L mRNAs. Sci Transl Med. 2019;11. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aat9143.
Adams D, Gonzalez-Duarte A, O'Riordan WD, Yang CC, Ueda M, Kristen AV, Tournev I, Schmidt HH, Coelho T, Berk JL, et al. Patisiran, an RNAi Therapeutic, for Hereditary Transthyretin Amyloidosis. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:11–21. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1716153.
Sardh E, Harper P, Balwani M, Stein P, Rees D, Bissell DM, Desnick R, Parker C, Phillips J, Bonkovsky HL, et al. Phase 1 Trial of an RNA Interference Therapy for Acute Intermittent Porphyria. N Engl J Med. 2019;380:549–58. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1807838.
Shi H, Chai P, Jia R, Fan X. Novel insight into the regulatory roles of diverse RNA modifications: Re-defining the bridge between transcription and translation. Mol Cancer. 2020;19:78. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12943-020-01194-6.
Crooke ST, Witztum JL, Bennett CF, Baker BF. RNA-Targeted Therapeutics. Cell Metab. 2018;27:714–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2018.03.004.
Liang XH, Shen W, Sun H, Migawa MT, Vickers TA, Crooke ST. Translation efficiency of mRNAs is increased by antisense oligonucleotides targeting upstream open reading frames. Nat Biotechnol. 2016;34:875–80. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3589.
Crooke ST. Molecular Mechanisms of Antisense Oligonucleotides. Nucleic Acid Ther. 2017;27:70–7. https://doi.org/10.1089/nat.2016.0656.
Wu H, Lima WF, Zhang H, Fan A, Sun H, Crooke ST. Determination of the role of the human RNase H1 in the pharmacology of DNA-like antisense drugs. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:17181–9. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M311683200
Lockhart A, Pires VB, Bento F, Kellner V, Luke-Glaser S, Yakoub G, Ulrich HD, Luke B. RNase H1 and H2 Are Differentially Regulated to Process RNA-DNA Hybrids. Cell Rep. 2019;29:2890–900 e2895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2019.10.108.
Lai F, Damle SS, Ling KK, Rigo F. Directed RNase H Cleavage of Nascent Transcripts Causes Transcription Termination. Mol Cell. 2020;77:1032–43 e1034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2019.12.029.
Liang XH, Sun H, Nichols JG, Crooke ST. RNase H1-Dependent Antisense Oligonucleotides Are Robustly Active in Directing RNA Cleavage in Both the Cytoplasm and the Nucleus. Mol Ther. 2017;25:2075–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymthe.2017.06.002.
Lima WF, Murray HM, Damle SS, Hart CE, Hung G, De Hoyos CL, Liang XH, Crooke ST: Viable RNaseH1 knockout mice show RNaseH1 is essential for R loop processing, mitochondrial and liver function. Nucleic Acids Res 2016, 44:5299-5312. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw350
Ruhanen H, Ushakov K, Yasukawa T. Involvement of DNA ligase III and ribonuclease H1 in mitochondrial DNA replication in cultured human cells. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1813;2011:2000–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2011.08.008.
Hyjek M, Figiel M, Nowotny M. RNases H: Structure and mechanism. DNA Repair (Amst). 2019;84:102672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2019.102672.
Cerritelli SM, Crouch RJ. RNases H: Multiple roles in maintaining genome integrity. DNA Repair (Amst). 2019;84:102742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2019.102742.
Bennett CF, Swayze EE. RNA targeting therapeutics: molecular mechanisms of antisense oligonucleotides as a therapeutic platform. Ann Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2010;50:259–93. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.010909.105654.
Crooke ST, Wang S, Vickers TA, Shen W, Liang XH. Cellular uptake and trafficking of antisense oligonucleotides. Nat Biotechnol. 2017;35:230–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3779.
Juliano RL, Ming X, Nakagawa O: Cellular uptake and intracellular trafficking of antisense and siRNA oligonucleotides. Bioconjug Chem 2012, 23:147-157. https://doi.org/10.1021/bc200377d
Liang XH, Shen W, Crooke ST. Specific Increase of Protein Levels by Enhancing Translation Using Antisense Oligonucleotides Targeting Upstream Open Frames. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017;983:129–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4310-9_9.
Liang XH, Sun H, Shen W, Wang S, Yao J, Migawa MT, Bui HH, Damle SS, Riney S, Graham MJ, et al. Antisense oligonucleotides targeting translation inhibitory elements in 5' UTRs can selectively increase protein levels. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:9528–46. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx632.
Urbanski LM, Leclair N, Anczukow O. Alternative-splicing defects in cancer: Splicing regulators and their downstream targets, guiding the way to novel cancer therapeutics. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA. 2018;9:e1476. https://doi.org/10.1002/wrna.1476.
Lim KH, Han Z, Jeon HY, Kach J, Jing E, Weyn-Vanhentenryck S, Downs M, Corrionero A, Oh R, Scharner J, et al. Antisense oligonucleotide modulation of non-productive alternative splicing upregulates gene expression. Nat Commun. 2020;11:3501. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17093-9.
Pradella D, Naro C, Sette C, Ghigna C. EMT and stemness: flexible processes tuned by alternative splicing in development and cancer progression. Mol Cancer. 2017;16:8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12943-016-0579-2.
Liang XH, Nichols JG, Hsu CW, Vickers TA, Crooke ST. mRNA levels can be reduced by antisense oligonucleotides via no-go decay pathway. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:6900–16. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz500.
Stepniak-Konieczna E, Konieczny P, Cywoniuk P, Dluzewska J, Sobczak K. AON-induced splice-switching and DMPK pre-mRNA degradation as potential therapeutic approaches for Myotonic Dystrophy type 1. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48:2531–43. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkaa007.
Aartsma-Rus A, Straub V, Hemmings R, Haas M, Schlosser-Weber G, Stoyanova-Beninska V, Mercuri E, Muntoni F, Sepodes B, Vroom E, Balabanov P. Development of Exon Skipping Therapies for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: A Critical Review and a Perspective on the Outstanding Issues. Nucleic Acid Ther. 2017;27:251–9. https://doi.org/10.1089/nat.2017.0682.
Wan L, Dreyfuss G. Splicing-Correcting Therapy for SMA. Cell. 2017;170:5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2017.06.028.
Pagliarini V, Guerra M, Di Rosa V, Compagnucci C, Sette C: Combined treatment with the histone deacetylase inhibitor LBH589 and a splice-switch antisense oligonucleotide enhances SMN2 splicing and SMN expression in Spinal Muscular Atrophy cells. J Neurochem 2020, 153:264-275. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnc.14935
Georgilis A, Klotz S, Hanley CJ, Herranz N, Weirich B, Morancho B, Leote AC, D'Artista L, Gallage S, Seehawer M, et al. PTBP1-Mediated Alternative Splicing Regulates the Inflammatory Secretome and the Pro-tumorigenic Effects of Senescent Cells. Cancer Cell. 2018;34:85–102 e109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccell.2018.06.007.
Dhuri K, Bechtold C, Quijano E, Pham H, Gupta A, Vikram A, Bahal R. Antisense Oligonucleotides: An Emerging Area in Drug Discovery and Development. J Clin Med. 2020;9. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9062004.
Singh RN, Singh NN. Mechanism of Splicing Regulation of Spinal Muscular Atrophy Genes. Adv Neurobiol. 2018;20:31–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89689-2_2.
Murdaca G, Tonacci A, Negrini S, Greco M, Borro M, Puppo F, Gangemi S. Effects of AntagomiRs on Different Lung Diseases in Human, Cellular, and Animal Models. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20163938.
Yoshioka K, Kunieda T, Asami Y, Guo H, Miyata H, Yoshida-Tanaka K, Sujino Y, Piao W, Kuwahara H, Nishina K, et al. Highly efficient silencing of microRNA by heteroduplex oligonucleotides. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:7321–32. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz492.
Fire A, Xu S, Montgomery MK, Kostas SA, Driver SE, Mello CC. Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature. 1998;391:806–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/35888.
Elbashir SM, Harborth J, Lendeckel W, Yalcin A, Weber K, Tuschl T. Duplexes of 21-nucleotide RNAs mediate RNA interference in cultured mammalian cells. Nature. 2001;411:494–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/35078107.
Caplen NJ, Parrish S, Imani F, Fire A, Morgan RA. Specific inhibition of gene expression by small double-stranded RNAs in invertebrate and vertebrate systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:9742–7. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.171251798.
Khvorova A, Watts JK. The chemical evolution of oligonucleotide therapies of clinical utility. Nat Biotechnol. 2017;35:238–48. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3765.
Han X, Wang L, Li T, Zhang J, Zhang D, Li J, Xia Y, Liu Y, Tan W. Beyond Blocking: Engineering RNAi-Mediated Targeted Immune Checkpoint Nanoblocker Enables T-Cell-Independent Cancer Treatment. ACS Nano. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.0c08022.
Zhang C, Zhao Y, Yang Y, Zhong C, Ji T, Duan J, Wang Y. RNAi mediated silencing of Nanog expression suppresses the growth of human colorectal cancer stem cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2020.11.101.
Wu SY, Lopez-Berestein G, Calin GA, Sood AK. RNAi therapies: drugging the undruggable. Sci Transl Med. 2014;6:240ps247. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3008362.
Finan C, Gaulton A, Kruger FA, Lumbers RT, Shah T, Engmann J, Galver L, Kelley R, Karlsson A, Santos R, et al. The druggable genome and support for target identification and validation in drug development. Sci Transl Med. 2017;9. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aag1166.
Setten RL, Rossi JJ, Han SP. The current state and future directions of RNAi-based therapeutics. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2019;18:421–46. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41573-019-0017-4.
Liu J, Carmell MA, Rivas FV, Marsden CG, Thomson JM, Song JJ, Hammond SM, Joshua-Tor L, Hannon GJ. Argonaute2 is the catalytic engine of mammalian RNAi. Science. 2004;305:1437–41. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1102513.
Schurmann N, Trabuco LG, Bender C, Russell RB, Grimm D. Molecular dissection of human Argonaute proteins by DNA shuffling. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2013;20:818–26. https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.2607.
Olina AV, Kulbachinskiy AV, Aravin AA, Esyunina DM. Argonaute Proteins and Mechanisms of RNA Interference in Eukaryotes and Prokaryotes. Biochemistry (Mosc). 2018;83:483–97. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0006297918050024.
Wilson RC, Doudna JA. Molecular mechanisms of RNA interference. Annu Rev Biophys. 2013;42:217–39. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biophys-083012-130404.
Daugaard I, Hansen TB. Biogenesis and Function of Ago-Associated RNAs. Trends Genet. 2017;33:208–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2017.01.003.
Salomon WE, Jolly SM, Moore MJ, Zamore PD, Serebrov V. Single-Molecule Imaging Reveals that Argonaute Reshapes the Binding Properties of Its Nucleic Acid Guides. Cell. 2015;162:84–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.06.029.
Broughton JP, Lovci MT, Huang JL, Yeo GW, Pasquinelli AE. Pairing beyond the Seed Supports MicroRNA Targeting Specificity. Mol Cell. 2016;64:320–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2016.09.004.
Haraszti RA, Roux L, Coles AH, Turanov AA, Alterman JF, Echeverria D, Godinho B, Aronin N, Khvorova A. 5-Vinylphosphonate improves tissue accumulation and efficacy of conjugated siRNAs in vivo. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:7581–92. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx507.
Schirle NT, Kinberger GA, Murray HF, Lima WF, Prakash TP, MacRae IJ. Structural Analysis of Human Argonaute-2 Bound to a Modified siRNA Guide. J Am Chem Soc. 2016;138:8694–7. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.6b04454.
Lima WF, Prakash TP, Murray HM, Kinberger GA, Li W, Chappell AE, Li CS, Murray SF, Gaus H, Seth PP, et al. Single-stranded siRNAs activate RNAi in animals. Cell. 2012;150:883–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.08.014.
Yu D, Pendergraff H, Liu J, Kordasiewicz HB, Cleveland DW, Swayze EE, Lima WF, Crooke ST, Prakash TP, Corey DR. Single-stranded RNAs use RNAi to potently and allele-selectively inhibit mutant huntingtin expression. Cell. 2012;150:895–908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.08.002.
Alterman JF, Godinho B, Hassler MR, Ferguson CM, Echeverria D, Sapp E, Haraszti RA, Coles AH, Conroy F, Miller R, et al. A divalent siRNA chemical scaffold for potent and sustained modulation of gene expression throughout the central nervous system. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37:884–94. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-019-0205-0.
Byrne M, Tzekov R, Wang Y, Rodgers A, Cardia J, Ford G, Holton K, Pandarinathan L, Lapierre J, Stanney W, et al. Novel hydrophobically modified asymmetric RNAi compounds (sd-rxRNA) demonstrate robust efficacy in the eye. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2013;29:855–64. https://doi.org/10.1089/jop.2013.0148.
Hong CA, Nam YS. Reducible Dimeric Conjugates of Small Internally Segment Interfering RNA for Efficient Gene Silencing. Macromol Biosci. 2016;16:1442–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.201600137.
Levanova AA, Kalke KM, Lund LM, Sipari N, Sadeghi M, Nyman MC, Paavilainen H, Hukkanen V, Poranen MM. Enzymatically synthesized 2'-fluoro-modified Dicer-substrate siRNA swarms against herpes simplex virus demonstrate enhanced antiviral efficacy and low cytotoxicity. Antiviral Res. 2020;182:104916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.antiviral.2020.104916.
Bueno MJ, Malumbres M. MicroRNAs and the cell cycle. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1812;2011:592–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbadis.2011.02.002.
Bandi N, Vassella E. miR-34a and miR-15a/16 are co-regulated in non-small cell lung cancer and control cell cycle progression in a synergistic and Rb-dependent manner. Mol Cancer. 2011;10:55. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-4598-10-55.
Ortiz-Quintero B. Extracellular MicroRNAs as Intercellular Mediators and Noninvasive Biomarkers of Cancer. Cancers (Basel). 2020;12. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12113455.
Svoronos AA, Engelman DM, Slack FJ. OncomiR or Tumor Suppressor? The Duplicity of MicroRNAs in Cancer. Cancer Res. 2016;76:3666–70. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-0359.
Heyn GS, Correa LH, Magalhaes KG. The Impact of Adipose Tissue-Derived miRNAs in Metabolic Syndrome, Obesity, and Cancer. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2020;11:563816. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2020.563816.
Eliasson L, Esguerra JLS. MicroRNA Networks in Pancreatic Islet Cells: Normal Function and Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes. 2020;69:804–12. https://doi.org/10.2337/dbi19-0016.
Cao W, Stricker E, Hotz-Wagenblatt A, Heit-Mondrzyk A, Pougialis G, Hugo A, Kuzmak J, Materniak-Kornas M, Lochelt M. Functional Analyses of Bovine Foamy Virus-Encoded miRNAs Reveal the Importance of a Defined miRNA for Virus Replication and Host-Virus Interaction. Viruses. 2020;12. https://doi.org/10.3390/v12111250.
Bochnakian A, Zhen A, Zisoulis DG, Idica A, KewalRamani VN, Neel N, Daugaard I, Hamdorf M, Kitchen S, Lee K, Pedersen IM. Interferon-Inducible MicroRNA miR-128 Modulates HIV-1 Replication by Targeting TNPO3 mRNA. J Virol. 2019;93. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.00364-19.
van Westering TLE, Lomonosova Y, Coenen-Stass AML, Betts CA, Bhomra A, Hulsker M, Clark LE, McClorey G, Aartsma-Rus A, van Putten M, et al. Uniform sarcolemmal dystrophin expression is required to prevent extracellular microRNA release and improve dystrophic pathology. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2020;11:578–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcsm.12506.
Eniafe J, Jiang S. MicroRNA-99 family in cancer and immunity. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA. 2020:e1635. https://doi.org/10.1002/wrna.1635.
Kim YK, Kim B, Kim VN. Re-evaluation of the roles of DROSHA, Export in 5, and DICER in microRNA biogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113:E1881–9. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1602532113.
Lee Y, Ahn C, Han J, Choi H, Kim J, Yim J, Lee J, Provost P, Radmark O, Kim S, Kim VN. The nuclear RNase III Drosha initiates microRNA processing. Nature. 2003;425:415–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01957.
Arif KMT, Elliott EK, Haupt LM, Griffiths LR. Regulatory Mechanisms of Epigenetic miRNA Relationships in Human Cancer and Potential as Therapeutic Targets. Cancers (Basel). 2020;12. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12102922.
Liang G, Weisenberger DJ. DNA methylation aberrancies as a guide for surveillance and treatment of human cancers. Epigenetics. 2017;12:416–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/15592294.2017.1311434.
Gerthoffer W. Epigenetic Targets for Oligonucleotide Therapies of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21239222.
Farooqi AA, Fayyaz S, Poltronieri P, Calin G, Mallardo M. Epigenetic deregulation in cancer: Enzyme players and non-coding RNAs. Semin Cancer Biol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcancer.2020.07.013.
Krutzfeldt J, Rajewsky N, Braich R, Rajeev KG, Tuschl T, Manoharan M, Stoffel M. Silencing of microRNAs in vivo with 'antagomirs'. Nature. 2005;438:685–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04303.
Civenni G. Targeting Promoter-Associated Noncoding RNA In Vivo. Methods Mol Biol. 2017;1543:259–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-6716-2_15.
Schmidt MF. miRNA Targeting Drugs: The Next Blockbusters? Methods Mol Biol. 2017;1517:3–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-6563-2_1.
Lindow M, Kauppinen S. Discovering the first microRNA-targeted drug. J Cell Biol. 2012;199:407–12. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201208082.
Shimakami T, Yamane D, Jangra RK, Kempf BJ, Spaniel C, Barton DJ, Lemon SM. Stabilization of hepatitis C virus RNA by an Ago2-miR-122 complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:941–6. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1112263109.
Jopling CL, Yi M, Lancaster AM, Lemon SM, Sarnow P. Modulation of hepatitis C virus RNA abundance by a liver-specific MicroRNA. Science. 2005;309:1577–81. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1113329.
Jopling CL. Targeting microRNA-122 to Treat Hepatitis C Virus Infection. Viruses. 2010;2:1382–93. https://doi.org/10.3390/v2071382.
Janssen HL, Reesink HW, Lawitz EJ, Zeuzem S, Rodriguez-Torres M, Patel K, van der Meer AJ, Patick AK, Chen A, Zhou Y, et al: Treatment of HCV infection by targeting microRNA. N Engl J Med 2013, 368:1685-1694. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1209026
Ottosen S, Parsley TB, Yang L, Zeh K, van Doorn LJ, van der Veer E, Raney AK, Hodges MR, Patick AK: In vitro antiviral activity and preclinical and clinical resistance profile of miravirsen, a novel anti-hepatitis C virus therapeutic targeting the human factor miR-122. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2015, 59:599-608. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.04220-14
van der Ree MH, de Vree JM, Stelma F, Willemse S, van der Valk M, Rietdijk S, Molenkamp R, Schinkel J, van Nuenen AC, Beuers U, et al. Safety, tolerability, and antiviral effect of RG-101 in patients with chronic hepatitis C: a phase 1B, double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2017;389:709–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31715-9.
Stelma F, van der Ree MH, Sinnige MJ, Brown A, Swadling L, JML d V, Willemse SB, van der Valk M, Grint P, Neben S, et al. Immune phenotype and function of natural killer and T cells in chronic hepatitis C patients who received a single dose of anti-MicroRNA-122, RG-101. Hepatology. 2017;66:57–68. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.29148.
Deng Y, Campbell F, Han K, Theodore D, Deeg M, Huang M, Hamatake R, Lahiri S, Chen S, Horvath G, et al. Randomized clinical trials towards a single-visit cure for chronic hepatitis C: Oral GSK2878175 and injectable RG-101 in chronic hepatitis C patients and long-acting injectable GSK2878175 in healthy participants. J Viral Hepat. 2020;27:699–708. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvh.13282.
Lee EC, Valencia T, Allerson C, Schairer A, Flaten A, Yheskel M, Kersjes K, Li J, Gatto S, Takhar M, et al. Discovery and preclinical evaluation of anti-miR-17 oligonucleotide RGLS4326 for the treatment of polycystic kidney disease. Nat Commun. 2019;10:4148. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-11918-y.
Gomez IG, MacKenna DA, Johnson BG, Kaimal V, Roach AM, Ren S, Nakagawa N, Xin C, Newitt R, Pandya S, et al. Anti-microRNA-21 oligonucleotides prevent Alport nephropathy progression by stimulating metabolic pathways. J Clin Invest. 2015;125:141–56. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI75852.
Seto AG, Beatty X, Lynch JM, Hermreck M, Tetzlaff M, Duvic M, Jackson AL. Cobomarsen, an oligonucleotide inhibitor of miR-155, co-ordinately regulates multiple survival pathways to reduce cellular proliferation and survival in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Br J Haematol. 2018;183:428–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.15547.
Gallant-Behm CL, Piper J, Lynch JM, Seto AG, Hong SJ, Mustoe TA, Maari C, Pestano LA, Dalby CM, Jackson AL, et al. A MicroRNA-29 Mimic (Remlarsen) Represses Extracellular Matrix Expression and Fibroplasia in the Skin. J Invest Dermatol. 2019;139:1073–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jid.2018.11.007.
Wang Z. The principles of MiRNA-masking antisense oligonucleotides technology. Methods Mol Biol. 2011;676:43–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60761-863-8_3.
Crick F. Central dogma of molecular biology. Nature. 1970;227:561–3. https://doi.org/10.1038/227561a0.
Digre A, Lindskog C. The Human Protein Atlas-Spatial localization of the human proteome in health and disease. Protein Sci. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.3987.
Uhlen M, Karlsson MJ, Hober A, Svensson AS, Scheffel J, Kotol D, Zhong W, Tebani A, Strandberg L, Edfors F, et al. The human secretome. Sci Signal. 2019;12. https://doi.org/10.1126/scisignal.aaz0274.
Sahin U, Karikó K, Türeci Ö. mRNA-based therapeutics—developing a new class of drugs. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2014;13:759–80.
Ward RA, Fawell S, Floc'h N, Flemington V, McKerrecher D, Smith PD. Challenges and Opportunities in Cancer Drug Resistance. Chem Rev. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00383.
Jahanafrooz Z, Baradaran B, Mosafer J, Hashemzaei M, Rezaei T, Mokhtarzadeh A, Hamblin MR. Comparison of DNA and mRNA vaccines against cancer. Drug Discov Tod. 2020;25:552–60.
Hajj KA, Whitehead KA. Tools for translation: non-viral materials for therapeutic mRNA delivery. Nat Rev Mat. 2017;2:1–17.
Pardi N, Hogan MJ, Porter FW, Weissman D. mRNA vaccines—a new era in vaccinology. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2018;17:261.
Yu AM, Choi YH, Tu MJ. RNA Drugs and RNA Targets for Small Molecules: Principles, Progress, and Challenges. Pharmacol Rev. 2020;72:862–98. https://doi.org/10.1124/pr.120.019554.
Weissman D, Ni H, Scales D, Dude A, Capodici J, McGibney K, Abdool A, Isaacs SN, Cannon G, Kariko K. HIV gag mRNA transfection of dendritic cells (DC) delivers encoded antigen to MHC class I and II molecules, causes DC maturation, and induces a potent human in vitro primary immune response. J Immunol. 2000;165:4710–7. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.165.8.4710.
Kariko K, Ni H, Capodici J, Lamphier M, Weissman D. mRNA is an endogenous ligand for Toll-like receptor 3. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:12542–50. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M310175200.
Heil F, Hemmi H, Hochrein H, Ampenberger F, Kirschning C, Akira S, Lipford G, Wagner H, Bauer S. Species-specific recognition of single-stranded RNA via toll-like receptor 7 and 8. Science. 2004;303:1526–9. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1093620.
Kramer MC, Anderson SJ, Gregory BD. The nucleotides they are a-changin': function of RNA binding proteins in post-transcriptional messenger RNA editing and modification in Arabidopsis. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2018;45:88–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2018.05.010.
Sakurai M, Yano T, Okada S, Takeuchi Y, Suzuki T. RNA modification/editing and regulatory gene expression. Tanpakushitsu Kakusan Koso. 2009;54:2086–91.
Bokar JA, Rottman FM. Biosynthesis and functions of modified nucleosides in eukaryotic mRNA. In Modification and Editing of RNA. Am Soc Microbiol. 1998:183–200.
Kariko K, Buckstein M, Ni H, Weissman D. Suppression of RNA recognition by Toll-like receptors: the impact of nucleoside modification and the evolutionary origin of RNA. Immunity. 2005;23:165–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2005.06.008.
Roundtree IA, He C. RNA epigenetics--chemical messages for posttranscriptional gene regulation. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2016;30:46–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2015.10.024.
Helm M, Motorin Y. Detecting RNA modifications in the epitranscriptome: predict and validate. Nat Rev Genet. 2017;18:275–91. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg.2016.169.
Saletore Y, Meyer K, Korlach J, Vilfan ID, Jaffrey S, Mason CE. The birth of the Epitranscriptome: deciphering the function of RNA modifications. Genome Biol. 2012;13:175. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2012-13-10-175.
Schwartz S. Cracking the epitranscriptome. RNA. 2016;22:169–74. https://doi.org/10.1261/rna.054502.115.
Wang X, Lu Z, Gomez A, Hon GC, Yue Y, Han D, Fu Y, Parisien M, Dai Q, Jia G, et al. N6-methyladenosine-dependent regulation of messenger RNA stability. Nature. 2014;505:117–20. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12730.
Wang Y, Li Y, Toth JI, Petroski MD, Zhang Z, Zhao JC. N6-methyladenosine modification destabilizes developmental regulators in embryonic stem cells. Nat Cell Biol. 2014;16:191–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb2902.
Gilbert WV, Bell TA, Schaening C. Messenger RNA modifications: Form, distribution, and function. Science. 2016;352:1408–12. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad8711.
Wen S, Wei Y, Zen C, Xiong W, Niu Y, Zhao Y. Long non-coding RNA NEAT1 promotes bone metastasis of prostate cancer through N6-methyladenosine. Mol Cancer. 2020;19:171. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12943-020-01293-4.
Zhao X, Yang Y, Sun BF, Shi Y, Yang X, Xiao W, Hao YJ, Ping XL, Chen YS, Wang WJ, et al. FTO-dependent demethylation of N6-methyladenosine regulates mRNA splicing and is required for adipogenesis. Cell Res. 2014;24:1403–19. https://doi.org/10.1038/cr.2014.151.
Kariko K, Muramatsu H, Welsh FA, Ludwig J, Kato H, Akira S, Weissman D. Incorporation of pseudouridine into mRNA yields superior nonimmunogenic vector with increased translational capacity and biological stability. Mol Ther. 2008;16:1833–40. https://doi.org/10.1038/mt.2008.200.
Eyler DE, Franco MK, Batool Z, Wu MZ, Dubuke ML, Dobosz-Bartoszek M, Jones JD, Polikanov YS, Roy B, Koutmou KS. Pseudouridinylation of mRNA coding sequences alters translation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019;116:23068–74. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1821754116.
Hoernes TP, Clementi N, Faserl K, Glasner H, Breuker K, Lindner H, Huttenhofer A, Erlacher MD. Nucleotide modifications within bacterial messenger RNAs regulate their translation and are able to rewire the genetic code. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:852–62. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv1182.
Shi Z, Barna M. Translating the genome in time and space: specialized ribosomes, RNA regulons, and RNA-binding proteins. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2015;31:31–54. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100814-125346.
Wang X, Zhao BS, Roundtree IA, Lu Z, Han D, Ma H, Weng X, Chen K, Shi H, He C. N(6)-methyladenosine Modulates Messenger RNA Translation Efficiency. Cell. 2015;161:1388–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.05.014.
Meyer KD, Patil DP, Zhou J, Zinoviev A, Skabkin MA, Elemento O, Pestova TV, Qian SB, Jaffrey SR. 5' UTR m (6) A Promotes Cap-Independent Translation. Cell. 2015;163:999–1010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.10.012.
Zhou J, Wan J, Gao X, Zhang X, Jaffrey SR, Qian SB. Dynamic m (6) A mRNA methylation directs translational control of heat shock response. Nature. 2015;526:591–4. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature15377.
Corbett KS, Flynn B, Foulds KE, Francica JR, Boyoglu-Barnum S, Werner AP, Flach B, O'Connell S, Bock KW, Minai M, et al. Evaluation of the mRNA-1273 Vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 in Nonhuman Primates. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:1544–55. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2024671.
Jackson LA, Anderson EJ, Rouphael NG, Roberts PC, Makhene M, Coler RN, McCullough MP, Chappell JD, Denison MR, Stevens LJ, et al. An mRNA Vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 - Preliminary Report. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:1920–31. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2022483.
Corbett KS, Edwards DK, Leist SR, Abiona OM, Boyoglu-Barnum S, Gillespie RA, Himansu S, Schafer A, Ziwawo CT, DiPiazza AT, et al. SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine design enabled by prototype pathogen preparedness. Nature. 2020;586:567–71. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2622-0.
Reck M, Mellemgaard A, von Pawel J, Gottfried M, Bondarenko I, Cheng Y, Zarogoulidis K, Luft A, Bennouna J, Barrueco J, et al: Anti-angiogenic-specific adverse events in patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with nintedanib and docetaxel. Lung Cancer 2015, 90:267-273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2015.08.003
Perdrizet K, Leighl NB. The Role of Angiogenesis Inhibitors in the Era of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Targeted Therapy in Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2019;20:21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-019-0617-6.
Jones BS, Jerome MS, Miley D, Jackson BE, DeShazo MR, Reddy VV, Singh KP, Brown OC, Robert F. Pilot phase II study of metronomic chemotherapy in combination with bevacizumab in patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2017;106:125–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2017.02.004.
Chen L, Qiu CH, Chen Y, Wang Y, Zhao JJ, Zhang M. LncRNA SNHG16 drives proliferation, migration, and invasion of lung cancer cell through modulation of miR-520/VEGF axis. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2020;24:9522–31. https://doi.org/10.26355/eurrev_202009_23037.
Mei J, Liu G, Wang W, Xiao P, Yang D, Bai H, Li R. OIP5-AS1 modulates epigenetic regulator HDAC7 to enhance non-small cell lung cancer metastasis via miR-140-5p. Oncol Lett. 2020;20:7. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2020.11868.
Yang H, Yang W, Dai W, Ma Y, Zhang G. LINC00667 promotes the proliferation, migration, and pathological angiogenesis in non-small cell lung cancer through stabilizing VEGFA by EIF4A3. Cell Biol Int. 2020;44:1671–80. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbin.11361.
Qin L, Zhong M, Adah D, Qin L, Chen X, Ma C, Fu Q, Zhu X, Li Z, Wang N, Chen Y. A novel tumour suppressor lncRNA F630028O10Rik inhibits lung cancer angiogenesis by regulating miR-223-3p. J Cell Mol Med. 2020;24:3549–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.15044.
Ishola AA, La'ah AS, Le HD, Nguyen VQ, Yang YP, Chou SJ, Tai HY, Chien CS, Wang ML. Non-coding RNA and lung cancer progression. J Chin Med Assoc. 2020;83:8–14. https://doi.org/10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000225.
Hou ZH, Xu XW, Fu XY, Zhou LD, Liu SP, Tan DM. Long non-coding RNA MALAT1 promotes angiogenesis and immunosuppressive properties of HCC cells by sponging miR-140. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2020;318:C649–63. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.00510.2018.
Mao Z, Xu B, He L, Zhang G. PVT1 Promotes Angiogenesis by Regulating miR-29c/Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) Signaling Pathway in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). Med Sci Monit. 2019;25:5418–25. https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.917601.
Wang Y, Han D, Pan L, Sun J. The positive feedback between lncRNA TNK2-AS1 and STAT3 enhances angiogenesis in non-small cell lung cancer. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2018;507:185–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.11.004.
Chen J, Liu A, Wang Z, Wang B, Chai X, Lu W, Cao T, Li R, Wu M, Lu Z, et al. LINC00173.v1 promotes angiogenesis and progression of lung squamous cell carcinoma by sponging miR-511-5p to regulate VEGFA expression. Mol Cancer. 2020;19:98. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12943-020-01217-2.
Shen M, Xie S, Rowicki M, Michel S, Wei Y, Hang X, Wan L, Lu X, Yuan M, Jin JF, et al. Therapeutic Targeting of Metadherin Suppresses Colorectal and Lung Cancer Progression and Metastasis. Cancer Res. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-20-1876.
Ge JH, Zhu JW, Fu HY, Shi WB, Zhang CL. An Antisense Oligonucleotide Drug Targeting miR-21 Induces H1650 Apoptosis and Caspase Activation. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2019;18:1533033819892263. https://doi.org/10.1177/1533033819892263.
Zhou Y, Guo D, Zhang Y. Association of MicroRNA-21 with p53 at Mutant Sites R175H and R248Q, Clinicopathological Features, and Prognosis of NSCLC. Mol Ther Oncolytics. 2020;19:208–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omto.2020.10.005.
Pop-Bica C, Pintea S, Magdo L, Cojocneanu R, Gulei D, Ferracin M, Berindan-Neagoe I. The Clinical Utility of miR-21 and let-7 in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Oncol. 2020;10:516850. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.516850.
Liao J, Shen J, Leng Q, Qin M, Zhan M, Jiang F. MicroRNA-based biomarkers for diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Thorac Cancer. 2020;11:762–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13337.
Liang H, Jiao Z, Rong W, Qu S, Liao Z, Sun X, Wei Y, Zhao Q, Wang J, Liu Y, et al. 3'-Terminal 2'-O-methylation of lung cancer miR-21-5p enhances its stability and association with Argonaute 2. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48:7027–40. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkaa504.
Ying H, Kimmelman AC, Lyssiotis CA, Hua S, Chu GC, Fletcher-Sananikone E, Locasale JW, Son J, Zhang H, Coloff JL, et al. Oncogenic Kras maintains pancreatic tumors through regulation of anabolic glucose metabolism. Cell. 2012;149:656–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.058.
Kim HS, Mendiratta S, Kim J, Pecot CV, Larsen JE, Zubovych I, Seo BY, Kim J, Eskiocak B, Chung H, et al. Systematic identification of molecular subtype-selective vulnerabilities in non-small-cell lung cancer. Cell. 2013;155:552–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2013.09.041.
Haigis KM. KRAS Alleles: The Devil Is in the Detail. Trends Cancer. 2017;3:686–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trecan.2017.08.006.
Matikas A, Mistriotis D, Georgoulias V, Kotsakis A. Targeting KRAS mutated non-small cell lung cancer: A history of failures and a future of hope for a diverse entity. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2017;110:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2016.12.005.
Gillson J, Ramaswamy Y, Singh G, Gorfe AA, Pavlakis N, Samra J, Mittal A, Sahni S. Small Molecule KRAS Inhibitors: The Future for Targeted Pancreatic Cancer Therapy? Cancers (Basel). 2020;12. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12051341.
Ross SJ, Revenko AS, Hanson LL, Ellston R, Staniszewska A, Whalley N, Pandey SK, Revill M, Rooney C, Buckett LK, et al. Targeting KRAS-dependent tumors with AZD4785, a high-affinity therapeutic antisense oligonucleotide inhibitor of KRAS. Sci Transl Med. 2017;9. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aal5253.
Wang Y, Wang D, Jia F, Miller A, Tan X, Chen P, Zhang L, Lu H, Fang Y, Kang X, et al. Self-Assembled DNA-PEG Bottlebrushes Enhance Antisense Activity and Pharmacokinetics of Oligonucleotides. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2020;12:45830–7. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c13995.
Kimura K, Matsumoto S, Harada T, Morii E, Nagatomo I, Shintani Y, Kikuchi A. ARL4C is associated with initiation and progression of lung adenocarcinoma and represents a therapeutic target. Cancer Sci. 2020;111:951–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/cas.14303.
Matsumoto S, Fujii S, Kikuchi A. Arl4c is a key regulator of tubulogenesis and tumourigenesis as a target gene of Wnt-beta-catenin and growth factor-Ras signalling. J Biochem. 2017;161:27–35. https://doi.org/10.1093/jb/mvw069.
Liao J, Chen Z, Yu Z, Huang T, Hu D, Su Y, He Z, Zou C, Zhang L, Lin X. The Role of ARL4C in Erlotinib Resistance: Activation of the Jak2/Stat 5/beta-Catenin Signaling Pathway. Front Oncol. 2020;10:585292. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.585292.
Fujii S, Matsumoto S, Nojima S, Morii E, Kikuchi A. Arl4c expression in colorectal and lung cancers promotes tumorigenesis and may represent a novel therapeutic target. Oncogene. 2015;34:4834–44. https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2014.402.
Sasaki S, Izumi H, Morimoto Y, Sakurai K, Mochizuki S. Induction of potent cell growth inhibition by schizophyllan/K-ras antisense complex in combination with gemcitabine. Bioorg Med Chem. 2020;28:115668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2020.115668.
Fujiwara N, Izumi H, Morimoto Y, Sakurai K, Mochizuki S. Complex consisting of antisense DNA and beta-glucan promotes internalization into cell through Dectin-1 and hybridizes with target mRNA in cytosol. Cancer Gene Ther. 2019;26:32–40. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41417-018-0033-2.
Tsoni SV, Brown GD. Beta-Glucans and dectin-1. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1143:45–60. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1443.019.
Zou S, Tong Q, Liu B, Huang W, Tian Y, Fu X. Targeting STAT3 in Cancer Immunotherapy. Mol Cancer. 2020;19:145. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12943-020-01258-7.
Hong D, Kurzrock R, Kim Y, Woessner R, Younes A, Nemunaitis J, Fowler N, Zhou T, Schmidt J, Jo M, et al. AZD9150, a next-generation antisense oligonucleotide inhibitor of STAT3 with early evidence of clinical activity in lymphoma and lung cancer. Sci Transl Med. 2015;7:314ra185. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aac5272.
Reilley MJ, McCoon P, Cook C, Lyne P, Kurzrock R, Kim Y, Woessner R, Younes A, Nemunaitis J, Fowler N, et al. STAT3 antisense oligonucleotide AZD9150 in a subset of patients with heavily pretreated lymphoma: results of a phase 1b trial. J Immunother Cancer. 2018;6:119. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40425-018-0436-5.
Njatcha C, Farooqui M, Kornberg A, Johnson DE, Grandis JR, Siegfried JM. STAT3 Cyclic Decoy Demonstrates Robust Antitumor Effects in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Mol Cancer Ther. 2018;17:1917–26. https://doi.org/10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-17-1194.
Han B, Park D, Li R, Xie M, Owonikoko TK, Zhang G, Sica GL, Ding C, Zhou J, Magis AT, et al. Small-Molecule Bcl2 BH4 Antagonist for Lung Cancer Therapy. Cancer Cell. 2015;27:852–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccell.2015.04.010.
Lam LT, Lin X, Faivre EJ, Yang Z, Huang X, Wilcox DM, Bellin RJ, Jin S, Tahir SK, Mitten M, et al. Vulnerability of Small-Cell Lung Cancer to Apoptosis Induced by the Combination of BET Bromodomain Proteins and BCL2 Inhibitors. Mol Cancer Ther. 2017;16:1511–20. https://doi.org/10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-16-0459.
Minegishi K, Dobashi Y, Tsubochi H, Tokuda R, Okudela K, Ooi A. Screening of the copy number increase of AKT in lung carcinoma by custom-designed MLPA. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2019;12:3344–56.
Cheng X, Yu D, Cheng G, Yung BC, Liu Y, Li H, Kang C, Fang X, Tian S, Zhou X, et al. T7 Peptide-Conjugated Lipid Nanoparticles for Dual Modulation of Bcl-2 and Akt-1 in Lung and Cervical Carcinomas. Mol Pharm. 2018;15:4722–32. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.8b00696.
Cheng X, Liu Q, Li H, Kang C, Liu Y, Guo T, Shang K, Yan C, Cheng G, Lee RJ. Lipid Nanoparticles Loaded with an Antisense Oligonucleotide Gapmer Against Bcl-2 for Treatment of Lung Cancer. Pharm Res. 2017;34:310–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-016-2063-5.
Reddy KB. Stem Cells: Current Status and Therapeutic Implications. Genes (Basel). 2020;11. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11111372.
Lopez-Lazaro M. Cancer arises from stem cells: opportunities for anticancer drug discovery. Drug Discov Today. 2015;20:1285–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2015.09.006.
Zhou BB, Zhang H, Damelin M, Geles KG, Grindley JC, Dirks PB. Tumour-initiating cells: challenges and opportunities for anticancer drug discovery. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2009;8:806–23. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd2137.
Zhang WC, Shyh-Chang N, Yang H, Rai A, Umashankar S, Ma S, Soh BS, Sun LL, Tai BC, Nga ME, et al. Glycine decarboxylase activity drives non-small cell lung cancer tumor-initiating cells and tumorigenesis. Cell. 2012;148:259–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2011.11.050.
Lin J, Lee JHJ, Paramasivam K, Pathak E, Wang Z, Pramono ZAD, Lim B, Wee KB, Surana U. Induced-Decay of Glycine Decarboxylase Transcripts as an Anticancer Therapeutic Strategy for Non-Small-Cell Lung Carcinoma. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2017;9:263–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omtn.2017.10.001.
Liu R, Xu KP, Tan GS. Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors in lung cancer treatment: Bench to bed. Eur J Pharmacol. 2015;769:127–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2015.11.007.
Li W, Yue W, Wang H, Lai B, Yang X, Zhang C, Wang Y, Gu M. Cyclooxygenase-2 is associated with malignant phenotypes in human lung cancer. Oncol Lett. 2016;12:3836–44. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2016.5207.
Brown JR, DuBois RN. Cyclooxygenase as a target in lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10:4266s–9s. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-040014.
Liu B, Qu L, Yan S. Cyclooxygenase-2 promotes tumor growth and suppresses tumor immunity. Cancer Cell Int. 2015;15:106. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12935-015-0260-7.
Xu Y, Yang X, Zhao P, Yang Z, Yan C, Guo B, Qian SY. Knockdown of delta-5-desaturase promotes the anti-cancer activity of dihomo-gamma-linolenic acid and enhances the efficacy of chemotherapy in colon cancer cells expressing COX-2. Free Radic Biol Med. 2016;96:67–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2016.04.016.
Pang L, Shah H, Wang H, Shu D, Qian SY, Sathish V. EpCAM-Targeted 3WJ RNA Nanoparticle Harboring Delta-5-Desaturase siRNA Inhibited Lung Tumor Formation via DGLA Peroxidation. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2020;22:222–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omtn.2020.08.024.
Yin Z, Cui Z, Li H, Li J, Zhou B. Polymorphisms in the H19 gene and the risk of lung Cancer among female never smokers in Shenyang, China. BMC Cancer. 2018;18:893. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4795-6.
Lin A, Hu Q, Li C, Xing Z, Ma G, Wang C, Li J, Ye Y, Yao J, Liang K, et al. The LINK-A lncRNA interacts with PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 to hyperactivate AKT and confer resistance to AKT inhibitors. Nat Cell Biol. 2017;19:238–51. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb3473.
Sun Q, Wang Y, Fan J, Li Z, Zhang J, Wang L, Fan X, Ji M, Zhu M, Dai J, et al. Association of expression quantitative trait loci for long noncoding RNAs with lung cancer risk in Asians. Mol Carcinog. 2019;58:1303–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/mc.23013.
Xie W, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Xiang Y, Wu N, Wu L, Li C, Cai T, Ma X, Yu Z, et al. SNP rs4142441 and MYC co-modulated lncRNA OSER1-AS1 suppresses non-small cell lung cancer by sequestering ELAVL1. Cancer Sci. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/cas.14713.
Ma J, Qi G, Li L. LncRNA NNT-AS1 promotes lung squamous cell carcinoma progression by regulating the miR-22/FOXM1 axis. Cell Mol Biol Lett. 2020;25:34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s11658-020-00227-8.
He W, Zhang Y, Xia S. LncRNA NNT-AS1 promotes non-small cell lung cancer progression through regulating miR-22-3p/YAP1 axis. Thorac Cancer. 2020;11:549–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13280.
Cai Y, Dong ZY, Wang JY. LncRNA NNT-AS1 is a major mediator of cisplatin chemoresistance in non-small cell lung cancer through MAPK/Slug pathway. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2018;22:4879–87. https://doi.org/10.26355/eurrev_201808_15624.
Gu W, Shi J, Liu H, Zhang X, Zhou JJ, Li M, Zhou D, Li R, Lv J, Wen G, et al. Peripheral blood non-canonical small non-coding RNAs as novel biomarkers in lung cancer. Mol Cancer. 2020;19:159. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12943-020-01280-9.
Liu B, Cao W, Qiao G, Yao S, Pan S, Wang L, Yue C, Ma L, Liu Y, Cui D. Effects of gold nanoprism-assisted human PD-L1 siRNA on both gene down-regulation and photothermal therapy on lung cancer. Acta Biomater. 2019;99:307–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2019.08.046.
Liu J, Feng Y, Zeng X, He M, Gong Y, Liu Y. Extracellular vesicles-encapsulated let-7i shed from bone mesenchymal stem cells suppress lung cancer via KDM3A/DCLK1/FXYD3 axis. J Cell Mol Med. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.15866.
Ahn YH, Ko YH. Diagnostic and Therapeutic Implications of microRNAs in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21228782.
Zhong Y, Ding X, Bian Y, Wang J, Zhou W, Wang X, Li P, Shen Y, Wang JJ, Li J, et al. Discovery and validation of extracellular vesicle-associated miRNAs as non-invasive detection biomarkers for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. Mol Oncol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1002/1878-0261.12889.
Xu S, Zheng L, Kang L, Xu H, Gao L. MicroRNA-let-7e in serum-derived exosomes inhibits the metastasis of non-small-cell lung cancer in a SUV39H2/LSD1/CDH1-dependent manner. Cancer Gene Ther. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41417-020-00216-1.
Tong J, Lu J, Yin Y, Wang Y, Zhang K. microRNA-195 Promotes Small Cell Lung Cancer Cell Apoptosis via Inhibiting Rap2C Protein-Dependent MAPK Signal Transduction. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2020;19:1533033820977546. https://doi.org/10.1177/1533033820977546.
Tatiparti K, Sau S, Kashaw SK. Iyer AK: siRNA Delivery Strategies: A Comprehensive Review of Recent Developments. Nanomaterials (Basel). 2017;7. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano7040077.
Zhang Y, Schwerbrock NM, Rogers AB, Kim WY, Huang L. Codelivery of VEGF siRNA and gemcitabine monophosphate in a single nanoparticle formulation for effective treatment of NSCLC. Mol Ther. 2013;21:1559–69. https://doi.org/10.1038/mt.2013.120.