Skip to main content

mRNA therapeutics in cancer immunotherapy


Synthetic mRNA provides a template for the synthesis of any given protein, protein fragment or peptide and lends itself to a broad range of pharmaceutical applications, including different modalities of cancer immunotherapy. With the ease of rapid, large scale Good Manufacturing Practice-grade mRNA production, mRNA is ideally poised not only for off-the shelf cancer vaccines but also for personalized neoantigen vaccination. The ability to stimulate pattern recognition receptors and thus an anti-viral type of innate immune response equips mRNA-based vaccines with inherent adjuvanticity. Nucleoside modification and elimination of double-stranded RNA can reduce the immunomodulatory activity of mRNA and increase and prolong protein production. In combination with nanoparticle-based formulations that increase transfection efficiency and facilitate lymphatic system targeting, nucleoside-modified mRNA enables efficient delivery of cytokines, costimulatory receptors, or therapeutic antibodies. Steady but transient production of the encoded bioactive molecule from the mRNA template can improve the pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and safety properties as compared to the respective recombinant proteins. This may be harnessed for applications that benefit from a higher level of expression control, such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-modified adoptive T-cell therapies. This review highlights the advancements in the field of mRNA-based cancer therapeutics, providing insights into key preclinical developments and the evolving clinical landscape.

Structure and pharmacology of synthetic mRNA

mRNA was long considered insufficiently stable for pharmaceutical applications, given its susceptibility to rapid degradation by ubiquitous RNases. Over the last 30 years, extensive efforts have been made to increase intracellular stability, translational efficiency and uptake of mRNA. These optimizations were achieved by modification of its non-coding elements (5′ cap structure and its capping efficiency [1,2,3,4], 5′- and 3′-untranslated regions (UTRs) [5,6,7,8,9], 3′ poly(A) tail [5, 10, 11]) and of the coding region [12], and through the development of transfection and formulation technologies (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Delivery and structural elements of mRNA therapeutics. Structure of a lipid-based mRNA nanoparticle (left) and synthetic mRNA (right), comprising a 5′ cap, 5′ and 3′ UTRs, a start codon initiating the open reading frame (AUG), and a poly(A) tail. Listed are different mRNA delivery methods, as well as tunable structural elements influencing mRNA translation, stability and potential of innate immune activation. UTR: untranslated region; ds: double-stranded

Building on these advances, synthetic mRNA has emerged as a versatile delivery system for genetic information to induce the production of peptides and proteins by cells.

Synthetic mRNA is single-stranded (ss), contains a 5′ cap, UTRs embracing the coding region and a 3′ poly(A) tail, thus resembling naturally occurring processed mature mRNA molecules, and is generated by in vitro transcription (IVT) from a linear DNA template. Exogenous mRNA enters the cell either by directly passing through the cytoplasmic membrane (e.g., if electroporated), or by endocytosis followed by endosomal escape (if delivered as naked or formulated mRNAs). mRNA does not enter the nucleus, nor integrates into the genome. Translation occurs in the cytosol and the protein derived from the synthetic mRNA is not distinguishable from protein translated from endogenous mRNA. The protein undergoes post-translational modifications and is routed to subcellular compartments, such as the secretory pathway, the cell membrane, the nucleus, mitochondria or peroxisomes, via targeting sequences or transmembrane domains. Eventually, the protein is degraded and peptides are presented on major histocompatibility (MHC) complexes.

In parallel to its translation to protein, exogenous mRNA exerts its activity as a natural ligand of endosomal toll-like receptors (TLRs) 3, 7 and 8, or of retinoic acid-inducible gene 1 (RIG-I) and melanoma differentiation-associated protein 5 (MDA5) in the cytoplasm, and triggers the release of type I interferon (IFN) and pro-inflammatory cytokines (reviewed in Pastor et al. [13]), providing mRNA with strong intrinsic adjuvanticity.

In cancer immunotherapy, the most advanced application of mRNA is therapeutic vaccination, which leverages both the capability of mRNA to deliver genetic information and its innate immunostimulatory activity. The latter is particularly important for breaking immune tolerance when cancer-associated self-antigens are targeted. However, IFN-stimulated genes (ISGs), such as IFN-inducible double-stranded (ds)RNA-activated protein kinase (PKR), and 2′,5′-oligoadenylate synthetase (OAS) with subsequent RNase L expression, initiate a state of anti-viral defense, characterized by stalled mRNA translation and increased targeting of mRNA for degradation (reviewed in Kroczynska et al. [14], Munir et al. [15]). Other applications of mRNA in cancer immunotherapy include the engineering of T cells and natural killer (NK) cells with antigen receptors, and its use as a template for immunologically active proteins in a variety of immune and non-immune cells (Fig. 2). Several of these applications rely more heavily on a high area under the curve (AUC) of mRNA translation, and stalled translation is not desirable. Immunostimulatory activity of mRNA can be attenuated by modified nucleosides, such as pseudouridine, N1-methylpseudouridine, 2-thiouridine, 5-methylcytidine or N6-methyladenosine [16,17,18,19], and by the removal of dsRNA [20, 21]. Throughout this review, mRNA nucleoside modifications are explicitly indicated where applicable.

Fig. 2
figure 2

mRNA therapeutics in cancer immunotherapy. mRNA is used for anti-cancer vaccination, where it delivers cancer antigens to APCs for the presentation on MHC class I and II (top left) and stimulates innate immune activation by binding to PRRs expressed by APCs (top right), introduces antigen receptors such as CARs and TCRs into lymphocytes (bottom right), and allows the expression of immunomodulatory proteins including TLRs, chemokine receptors, co-stimulatory ligands, cytokines, chemokines and different mAb formats in various cell subsets (bottom left). APC: antigen-presenting cell; CAR: chimeric antigen receptor; mAb: monoclonal antibody; MDA5: melanoma differentiation-associated protein 5; pMHC: peptide-major histocompatibility complex; NKG2D: natural killer group 2D; PRR: pattern recognition receptors; RIG-I: retinoic acid-inducible gene 1; TCR: T-cell receptor; TLR: Toll-like receptor

With the global threat of the COVID-19 pandemic accelerating rapid-response vaccine development, mRNA-based therapeutics were shown to deliver on their promise: active at a relatively low dose range, can be developed rapidly, and GMP-compliant manufacturing processes easily upscaled for rapid availability of large numbers of doses [22,23,24]. It is to be expected that lessons learned in the context of COVID-19 vaccine development can be leveraged to further advance the development of mRNA–based cancer immunotherapies.

mRNA-based cancer vaccines

Cancer vaccination involves the induction of tumor-specific T-cell responses potentially capable of tumor rejection by providing cancer antigens in the context of immunostimulation. Some cancer vaccines targeting surface exposed antigens additionally aim at inducing a tumor-specific B-cell response. Antigens are either tumor-associated self antigens (TAA), such as differentiation antigens, overexpressed antigens, cancer/testis antigens, or truly tumor-specific antigens (TSAs) not subject to immune tolerance, such as viral and mutated neoantigens. Various formats can be used for antigen delivery, including viral vectors, DNA, peptides, mRNA, or dendritic cells (DCs) pulsed with any of these.

mRNA has emerged as an attractive cancer vaccine format as it provides both antigen delivery and innate immune activation-mediated co-stimulation in a spatiotemporally aligned manner. mRNA vaccines encode the full or partial sequence of a TSA or TAA, and do not rely on prior identification of a patient’s human leukocyte antigen (HLA) haplotype or epitope prediction.

The feasibility of mRNA-based cancer vaccination was first demonstrated about 25 years ago [25, 26]. Since then, numerous preclinical and clinical studies explored mRNA for anti-cancer vaccination, either by loading it ex vivo on autologous DCs for adoptive transfer or by direct injection. A summary of all active, and completed or terminated phase II and III clinical trials using mRNA vaccines is provided in Table 1.

Table 1 List of all active, and completed or terminated phase II/III clinical trials of mRNA vaccines in cancer therapy

mRNA-based DC vaccines

As professional antigen presenting cells (APCs), DCs constantly engulf cellular material from their surroundings. To efficiently deliver tumor antigen to DCs, many early studies focused on ex vivo DC loading and re-infusion of the transfected cells to patients via the subcutaneous, intranodal (injected into a particular lymph node) or intravenous route. The generation of DC vaccines requires isolation of monocytes or hematopoietic progenitor cells from the blood (leukapheresis), ex vivo cultivation, differentiation and tumor-antigen loading and is labor-intensive, costly and complex (detailed review by Perez et al. [47]).

Loading DCs with tumor antigens

One of the approaches to pulse DCs with mRNA encoding tumor antigens is the use of bulk mRNA extracted from autologous tumors. Whole tumor mRNA-loaded DC vaccines demonstrated safety in phase I and I/II clinical trials in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC; NCT00006431) [48], pediatric and adult brain cancer [49], pediatric neuroblastoma [50], melanoma (NCT01278940) [51], and androgen-resistant prostate cancer [52]. In a phase I/II study (NCT01278940), whole tumor mRNA-transfected DC vaccines were administered alone or together with interleukin (IL)-2 and induced T-cell responses against mRNA-transfected DCs ex vivo in 16 of the 31 patients with advanced melanoma [53]. Immune-responders exhibited significantly enhanced survival in comparison to non-immune-responders (14 vs. 6 months). As the mRNA is extracted from the individual patient’s tumor, feasibility depends on sample availability and quality. Vaccine production is therefore highly variable and sometimes impossible. Within the extracted mRNA, truly cancer-associated antigen encoding mRNAs represent a very small fraction. A low number of relevant epitopes needs to compete with the majority of irrelevant peptides for presentation on MHC molecules for T-cell priming. In vitro mRNA amplification attempting to increase the abundance of all mRNA species in bulk preparations including those representing potential tumor rejection antigens, may even promote under-representation or loss of immunogenic antigens or epitopes in the process [54].

Another approach is to resort to defined TAAs and generate synthetic mRNA for ex vivo DC transfection, as has been done with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) [55], carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) [56, 57], gp100/tyrosinase [58,59,60], human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) [61] and Wilms’ tumor 1 (WT1) antigen [27, 62]. TAA mRNA DC vaccines exhibited good safety profiles in phase I and I/II clinical trials without serious adverse effects, such as autoimmunity, and did not show dose-limiting toxicity. In a phase II clinical study (NCT00965224), patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in remission were vaccinated with WT1 mRNA-electroporated DCs [27]. Prevention or delay of relapse was observed in 43% of patients and the five-year overall survival of the vaccinated patients compared favorably to historic controls.

In a randomized phase II clinical trial (NCT01446731), a DC vaccine with mRNA encoding PSA, prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP), survivin and hTERT failed to significantly increase the disease-specific survival of docetaxel-treated, castration-resistant prostate cancer patients (docetaxel: 21.9 months, docetaxel and DC vaccination: 25.1 months) [34]. TAA-specific T-cell responses were present in 9 of the 18 combination therapy-treated patients, of which three were de novo.

In 78 melanoma patients with resected regional lymph node metastases (NCT00940004, NCT01530698, NCT02285413, NCT00243529), vaccination with gp100- and tyrosinase-mRNA loaded DC vaccines as an adjuvant treatment showed a favorable safety profile and induced tumor-specific T-cell responses in 71% of the patients [63]. The overall survival of DC-vaccinated patients was doubled as compared to that of 209 matched controls (63.6 months vs. 31.0 months).

Generally speaking, T-cell responses induced by mRNA-loaded DC vaccines have been rather weak, which may contribute to the low clinical efficacy. DC differentiation, maturation and antigen loading directly impact DC homing and T cell co-stimulation (reviewed in Gu et al. [64]), and are targets for further improvement of this approach.

Engineering DC antigen presentation

Cognate T-cell help is a critical factor that determines the extent of vaccine-induced T-cell responses. This requires the vaccine antigen to be presented on MHC class II molecules of the DC. mRNA transfected into DCs undergoes cytoplasmic translation, enters the endogenous processing compartment and is therefore presented on MHC class I rather than MHC class II molecules. Several strategies have been followed to enhance MHC class II antigen presentation by routing the antigen through lysosomal compartments, such as fusion of the vaccine antigen to lysosome-associated membrane proteins (LAMPs) [65, 66], or to the MHC class I cytoplasmic and transmembrane domain [67]. Fusion of a lysosomal targeting signal (LAMP-1) to CEA in a chimeric mRNA (CEA/LAMP-1) enhanced the expansion of CEA-specific CD4+ T-cell responses and led to a more potent CEA-specific CTL response in vitro [68]. CEA LAMP mRNA-transfected DC vaccines were evaluated in phase I studies in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme (NCT02529072, NCT00626483, NCT00639639) [32, 33, 69, 70], which suggested prolongation of overall survival as compared to non-transfected DC vaccines or historical controls [33]. Four ongoing phase II clinical trials are evaluating CEA/LAMP-1 mRNA engineered DC vaccines in glioblastoma patients in combination with tetanus toxoid preconditioning to enhance DC migration, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), and other drugs, such as basiliximab (antagonistic anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody (mAb)), varilumab (agonistic anti-CD27 mAb) or temozolomide (NCT02366728, NCT03927222, NCT03688178, NCT02465268).

Co-stimulatory ligands and receptors

As ssRNA and dsRNA trigger TLR activation, pulsing of DCs with mRNA provides a maturation signal irrespective of the biological activity of the encoded antigen. Several strategies aim to further improve the T-cell priming capacity of tumor-antigen loaded DC vaccines. These include co-transfection with immunostimulatory ligands and receptors for enhanced DC maturation and T-cell co-stimulation, which can be introduced by mRNA. In preclinical studies, DC co-transfection of cancer antigens with OX40 ligand (OX40L), 4-1BB ligand (4-1BBL), glucocorticoid-induced tumor necrosis factor receptor (GITR) ligand (GITRL), CD40 ligand (CD40L), constitutively active (ca)CD40 or inducible T cell co-stimulatory ligand (ICOSL) mRNA improved DC co-stimulation and resulted in enhanced T-cell priming [71,72,73,74,75,76]. One of the most clinically advanced DC vaccines is Rocapuldencel-T, an autologous tumor mRNA-transfected DC vaccine co-transfected with CD40L mRNA [28, 29]. In a phase III trial with 462 metastatic RCC (mRCC) patients (NCT01582672), Rocapuldencel-T failed to improve the overall survival of sunitinib-treated mRCC patients. Co-transfecting TAA mRNA-loaded DC vaccines with CD40L, CD70 and caTLR4 mRNA (TriMix) represents an alternative approach [77,78,79]. Superior T-cell priming capacity was observed by T-cell stimulation with TriMix-transfected DCs compared to that induced by irrelevant mRNA-transfected immature DCs, or by DCs matured in culture supplemented with cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)α, and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2)) [77]. In a single-arm phase II clinical study, TriMix-DCs, transfected with TriMix and four TAAs (melanoma-associated antigen (MAGE)-A3, MAGE-C2, tyrosinase, or gp100) fused to an MHC class II targeting signal, plus the mAb ipilimumab (blocking the immune checkpoint cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4)) were combined in 39 pretreated advanced melanoma patients (NCT01302496) [37]. The combination was well tolerated and after a median follow-up of 36 months, eight complete and seven partial responses were observed. T-cell responses were detected in 12 of 15 patients by IFNγ enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISpot) [38]. The study lacked a direct comparison of TriMix-DCs and ipilimumab against ipilimumab alone.

Co-stimulatory cytokines

mRNA-encoded cytokines are another class of molecules used to enhance DC maturation and T-cell priming capacity. In the context of autologous DC vaccines loaded with whole tumor mRNA preparations or with synthetic TAA-encoding mRNA, co-transfection with cytokine-encoding mRNA, such as GM-CSF, IL-12 and IL-15, was explored [80,81,82,83,84]. Co-transfection of GM-CSF mRNA into tumor mRNA-loaded DCs significantly enhanced the anti-tumor efficacy of DC vaccines in CT26 tumor-bearing mice, which was associated with increased cytotoxicity of bulk splenocytes against CT26 tumor cells in vitro [80]. In another study, co-delivery of IL-12 mRNA enhanced the ex vivo migratory and immunostimulatory capacity of healthy donor-derived human DCs transfected with melanoma antigen recognized by T cells (MART)-1 [81]. Proliferation, effector function and memory potential of MART-1-specific CD8+ T cells were significantly enhanced by co-culture with IL-12 and MART-1 mRNA-transfected DCs compared to MART-1 mRNA-transfected DCs alone.

mRNA-based direct cancer vaccines

The direct injection of mRNA is an alternative to DC vaccines and circumvents the necessity of DC isolation, ex vivo cultivation and re-infusion. Injected mRNA is taken up by local cells, including APCs, and translocates to the cytoplasm for translation. Various mRNA vaccines are currently being evaluated, using different nanoparticle formulations, delivery routes and structural backbones, of which the most advanced candidates are summarized below.

Non-formulated mRNA vaccines

Non-formulated or “naked” mRNA administered intradermally or into lymph nodes (intranodally) has been shown to prime T-cell responses in mice [85,86,87,88] and humans [45, 89, 90]. The rationale for intranodal injection is to deliver the vaccine directly into the area of T-cell priming for uptake by resident DCs. The major uptake mechanism of naked mRNA by immature DCs in lymph nodes [91] and in the dermis [92] is macropinocytosis. The feasibility and safety of naked mRNA vaccines was first demonstrated in a phase I/II trial in 15 metastatic melanoma patients using intradermally injected autologous tumor mRNA and GM-CSF [93]. In five of 13 evaluable patients, enhanced antigen-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell responses in ex vivo expanded PBMC were detected by intracellular IFNγ staining upon re-stimulation with tumor mRNA-transfected PBMC. Vaccine-induced humoral responses were analyzed by incubating allogenic melanoma cell lines with plasma samples taken before or during the therapy followed by flow cytometry analysis to detect cell-bound IgG antibodies. Upon vaccination, an increase in the amount of tumor-cell specific IgG antibodies was observed in the plasma of four out of the 13 patients. Objective responses were not apparent in this trial. In a phase I/II clinical study with 30 stage IV RCC patients, intradermal administration of naked mRNA encoding mucin 1 (MUC1), CEA, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2)/neu, telomerase, survivin and MAGE-A1 combined with GM-CSF was well tolerated and associated with stable disease in 15 patients and one partial response [90]. Antigen-specific T-cell responses were observed by IFNγ ELISpot or chromium-release cytotoxicity assays in 12 out of 17 patients.

In 2012, a phase I study of 29 advanced melanoma patients was initiated, which proved that intranodal injection of mRNA is both feasible and safe (NCT01684241) (unpublished results). Vaccination induced either de novo or expanded existing T-cell responses against the vaccine-encoded antigens New York esophageal squamous cell carcinoma-1 (NY-ESO-1) and tyrosinase in six out of 13 evaluable patients. New lesions occurred in only eight of the 29 patients during the course of the study. In another phase I study of 20 melanoma patients (NCT03394937), intranodal injection of tyrosinase, gp100, MAGE-A3, MAGE-C2, and melanoma antigen preferentially expressed in tumors (PRAME)-encoding mRNA together with TriMix mRNA was well tolerated. As observed by IFNy ELISpot and intracellular cytokine staining, T-cell responses against at least one TAA were induced in 35% of patients [45].

Mutated neoantigens are promising vaccine targets as they are abundant in many tumor types and highly tumor-specific (reviewed in Vormehr et al. [94]). Neoantigen-specific T cells are likely not subject to central tolerance and have a higher likelihood to induce high-affinity T-cell responses, while TAAs come with the challenge of breaking tolerance. However, as each single tumor has its unique profile of mutations, the full potential of mutated neoantigens as an ideal source for vaccine antigens can only be leveraged in the context of individualized vaccines, with each and every patient being administered their personal set of mutated epitopes. As mRNA vaccines can be produced fast and cost-effectively, they are particularly suited for the purpose of “on demand” vaccine design and manufacturing. Intranodal administration of a neoantigen-specific mRNA vaccine, comprising 20 patient-specific mutations, was investigated in a phase I clinical trial in stage III and IV melanoma patients (NCT02035956) [89]. Neoantigen-specific mRNA vaccines induced CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell responses against multiple vaccine neoepitopes in 13 evaluable melanoma patients. Objective responses were observed and the cumulative rate of recurrences was significantly reduced by vaccination, resulting in a sustained progression-free survival. The vaccine was well tolerated.

Formulated mRNA vaccines

Nanoparticulate formulations protect mRNA from extracellular RNases and improve uptake by APCs in vivo. Formulations typically contain polymers, such as protamine, or cationic and ionizable lipids with or without polyethylene glycol (PEG) derivatives to enable complexing with mRNA via electrostatic interactions and condensing of the RNA molecules (reviewed in Zeng et al. [95]).

One of the mRNA formulations in advanced clinical development is based on protamine, a polycationic peptide that complexes negatively charged mRNA for intradermal delivery [42,43,44, 96,97,98,99,100]. In mice, protamine-formulated mRNA is taken up by leukocytes and non-leukocytes in the skin, including APCs that migrate to the draining lymph node, express and present the encoded protein and induce T-cell responses [96]. The safety and feasibility of a protamine-formulated mRNA vaccine encoding MART-1, tyrosinase, gp100, MAGE-A1, MAGE-A3 and survivin was demonstrated in 21 metastatic melanoma patients (NCT00204607) [99]. The mRNA vaccine was injected intradermally with GM-CSF either alone or in conjunction with keyhole limpet hemocyanin as adjuvants [101]. Antigen-specific T cell responses in ex vivo expanded PBMC were detected by intracellular IFNγ staining after re-stimulation with irradiated, autologous PBMC transfected with TAA mRNA. Vaccination was associated with an increase in the number of antigen-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in two of four immunologically evaluable patients. One complete response occurred in seven patients with measurable disease. In addition, a vaccine encoding six protamine-formulated prostate cancer-specific antigens (PSA, prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), prostate stem cell antigen (PSCA), 6-transmembrane epithelial antigen of prostate (STEAP), PAP and MUC1) was investigated in a phase I/II trial in patients with asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (NCT01817738) [42,43,44]. The vaccine was well tolerated. In the phase I part, vaccine-induced antigen-specific T-cell responses were shown in 26 of 33 patients by ex vivo IFNγ ELISpot assay, intracellular cytokine and tetramer flow cytometry [44]. In the randomized, placebo-controlled phase II part of the study (n = 197) [43], the vaccine failed to improve overall survival and progression-free survival. A vaccine derived from the same protamine-formulated mRNA platform encoding five tumor-associated antigens (NY-ESO-1, MAGE-C1, MAGE-C2, survivin and trophoblast glycoprotein (TPBG)) was further evaluated in a phase I/IIa dose-escalation trial in seven patients with locally advanced and 39 patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and controlled disease after first-line therapy (NCT00923312) [100]. The vaccine was well-tolerated and induced T-cell responses against one or more antigens in 63% of evaluable patients. The median overall survival, however, was not improved by vaccine monotherapy compared to that typically seen with maintenance chemotherapy. An ongoing phase I/II trial is currently evaluating this vaccine, with the addition of the antigen MUC1 in combination with either the antagonistic anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibody durvalumab or durvalumab plus the antagonistic anti-CTLA-4 antibody tremelimumab in patients with metastatic NSCLC (NCT03164772).

A major limitation of local administration is that only the injected or the draining lymph nodes are accessed and participate in antigen-specific T-cell priming. Other formulations are required for intravenous administration to deliver mRNA to secondary lymphoid organs body-wide, including the spleen as the largest agglomeration of immune cells. Formulation technologies developed for intravenous administration not only protect RNA integrity, but also promote its targeted expression in lymph node-resident DCs.

mRNA lipoplexes (RNA-LPX) are based on cationic liposomes as broadly used for transfection reagents in vitro [102]. Specific delivery of nanoparticles to APCs and improved uptake for presentation of epitopes derived from the encoded antigens can be achieved by decorating such particles with targeting moieties, such as antibodies, single chain variable fragments (scFv) fragments and small molecules binding DEC-205, mannose receptors and C-type lectin domain family 9 (CLEC9A) (reviewerd in Phuha et al. [103]; [104, 105]). Alternatively, RNA-LPX can be modified to have a negative net charge when prepared by molar excess of negatively charged mRNA, or by shielding positive surface charges with PEG. mRNA-LPX with a negative net charge are subject to specific uptake by APCs in vivo without the need for targeting moieties (reviewed in Guan et al. [106]).

Intravenously administered negatively charged to near-neutral RNA-LPX vaccines have been shown in mice to target APCs resident in lymphoid organs, including the spleen, lymph nodes and bone marrow, while inducing strong local (cell-specific activation) and systemic (proinflammatory cytokine abundance in the circulation) type I IFN-dominated immune modulation [40]. In several mouse tumor models, RNA-LPX vaccines induce strong effector and memory T-cell responses directed against the encoded TSAs or TAAs, and mediate tumor growth control or rejection, and improve survival [40, 107,108,109]. In a phase I clinical trial (NCT02410733), 119 melanoma patients were vaccinated with an RNA-LPX vaccine encoding the four melanoma TAAs MAGE-A3, transmembrane phosphatase with tensin homology (TPTE), NY-ESO-1 and tyrosinase [40, 41]. In the subset of antagonistic anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) antibody-experienced patients with evaluable disease at baseline (n = 25), vaccination alone mediated one metabolic complete response, three partial responses and seven cases of stable disease. In combination with anti-PD-1 antibodies (pembrolizumab or nivolumab, n = 17), six partial responses and two cases of stable disease were observed. RNA-LPX vaccine-induced CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell responses were observed in the majority of patients reaching up to low double-digit percentages of total circulating CD8+ T cells. A randomized phase II study will investigate this melanoma TAA-specific RNA-LPX vaccine in combination with the antagonistic anti-PD-1 antibody cemiplimab (NCT04526899). The same platform encoding other tumor type specific TAAs is being evaluated in various phase I and I/II clinical trials in patients with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC; NCT02316457), ovarian cancer (NCT04163094) and prostate cancer (NCT04382898).

Moreover, several clinical trials are testing this intravenous RNA-LPX technology in conjunction with TSAs, which are expected to be less compromised by central immune tolerance. One example is a human papilloma virus (HPV)16 E6 and E7 mRNA-encoding RNA-LPX vaccine, which is being evaluated in a randomized phase II trial in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with HPV16+ and PD-L1+ head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) (NCT04534205). Another example is the so-called individualized neoantigen-specific immunotherapy (iNeST) program, which treats each patient with their ‘on-demand’ manufactured individualized set of cancer mutations. This truly personalized treatment approach is being tested in various tumor types and treatment lines in the phase I and II studies NCT03289962, NCT03815058, and NCT04486378.

The same RNA-LPX vaccine platform was utilized to expand chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-engineered T cells against claudin 6 (CLDN6), a carcinoembryonic cell surface antigen, in mice [110]. Vaccination with CLDN6-encoding RNA-LPX resulted in the expression of CLDN6 on splenic DCs and macrophages in vivo and increased the proportion of proliferating CLDN6-CAR-T cells after adoptive transfer. Subtherapeutic doses of CLDN6-CAR-T cells were expanded by the CLDN6 RNA-LPX vaccine, resulting in regression of subcutaneous CLDN6+ Lewis lung tumors. Safety and efficacy of this concept are currently being evaluated in a phase I/II clinical study in patients with solid cancers (NCT04503278).

Lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) are mRNA formulations based on a mixture of cholesterol, ionizable and helper lipids, and PEG-derivatives [106]. Intramuscularly administered RNA-LNPs have recently gained attention, as this is the format of the first two SARS-CoV-2 vaccines to be approved, based on their demonstration of compelling efficacy in COVID-19 protection [22, 111,112,113,114,115,116,117], which was in line with previous preclinical and clinical data showing induction of strong antigen-specific immune responses against other infectious diseases [118,119,120]. Both BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 contain N1-methylpseudouridine-modified mRNA with blunted innate immune modulatory activity to promote potent TH1, T follicular helper and germinal center B cell responses for the induction of neutralizing antibodies as part of the multi-effector immune response [115, 121, 122].

In the cancer therapeutic field, intramuscularly administered, LNP-formulated nucleoside-modified mRNA vaccines encoding 20 patient-specific mutated neoepitopes are currently being evaluated in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with solid cancer (NCT03313778, phase I) and melanoma (NCT03897881, randomized phase II). Data from a recent phase I clinical trial in four gastrointestinal cancer patients (NCT03480152) suggest that vaccination with neoantigen-specific RNA-LNP is safe and induces mutation-specific T-cell responses [123] with no objective clinical responses observed yet in the limited number of patients tested.

Besides the clinically explored mRNA formulations discussed above, a plethora of different in vivo DC-targeting mRNA nanoparticles are under development. A recent study analyzed over 1000 mRNA lipid formulations for transfection efficacy. A subset of these were tested for in vivo protein production, APC maturation in local lymph nodes, induction of T and B cell responses in naïve, and anti-tumor efficacy of Trp2, OVA and E7-encoding mRNA lipid formulations in B16, B16-OVA and TC-1 tumor-bearing mice [124]. The formulations performing best shared a common structure involving an unsaturated lipid tail, a dihydroimidazole linker and a cyclic amine head group and mediate APC maturation by signaling through the STING pathway. Insights such as these will promote rational approaches for formulation development.

mRNA-encoded antigen receptors

Another immunotherapy approach in cancer is based on the redirection of T cells against tumor cells by stable integration of tumor-specific antigen receptors, either with T cell receptors (TCRs) which recognize MHC-presented epitopes from both intra- and extracellular antigens, or CARs which bind to tumor surface antigens and are MHC-independent. T cells are then expanded in cell culture systems. Patients are treated with a lymphodepleting chemotherapy regimen prior to adoptive cell transfer (ACT) of such engineered cell products to improve engraftment.

In the ACT field, CD19-directed CAR-T cells are the most advanced. Several products have been market authorized for the treatment of B-cell leukemia and lymphoma [125, 126] based on response rates of over 80%, half of which were complete responses. Usually retro- or lentiviral technologies are applied to engineer antigen-receptor expressing cells. Stably transduced CAR-T cells are highly potent and are living drugs, the efficacy of which is associated with their capability to persist. When developing CAR-T cells against new antigens that are not yet vetted clinically for target safety, transient expression of an mRNA-encoded CAR may be risk-mitigating. Also, in contrast to viral transduction, mRNA does not pose the risk of genomic integration of the transgene and malignant transformation. mRNA transfection further allows the co-delivery of additional mRNAs for concomitant manipulation of lymphocytes, such as immunostimulatory cytokines [127], chemokine receptors or adhesion molecules for targeted migration [128,129,130,131], or Cas9-mediated genome editing [132].

Generating CAR-T cells with mRNA

Electroporation of mRNA CARs is a practical and scalable method accomplishing lymphocyte transfection rates of more than 90% without affecting the viability of the cell product, and is used in the vast majority of studies [133,134,135,136]. mRNA electroporation results in CAR expression on the surface of T cells for around 7 days [137,138,139,140] and CARs internalized upon target cell encounter are not restored [139, 141,142,143,144]. The molecular structure of the CAR construct (e.g., co-stimulatory domains) may impact the level and duration of expression [145,146,147,148]. While the level and persistence of CAR expression correlate positively with potency of killing, high CAR expression was shown in vitro to favor activation-induced cell death (AICD) [138], and high amounts of mRNA input can affect viability [149]. Optimization of structural elements including the 5′ cap, UTRs and poly(A) tail [150, 151] improves CAR expression levels and duration, and may circumvent the need for high mRNA input amounts. In addition, dsRNA removal and N1-methylpseudouridine modification have been shown to enhance CAR expression and result in more functional CAR-T cells [152], but have not yet been applied in clinical mRNA CAR studies.

mRNA CAR-T cells must be administered repeatedly, in contrast to classical CAR-T cells which constitutively express the CAR. Consequently, mRNA CAR-T cells are produced in large quantities and cryopreserved in batches that can be thawed for each treatment cycle. GMP-compliant protocols for the large-scale manufacturing of mRNA CAR-T cells have been established [153, 154], and freezing mRNA CAR-T cells was demonstrated not to negatively affect their function [136, 138, 145, 148]. For the treatment of solid tumors, intratumoral injection is a way to prevent T cells from losing CAR expression before reaching the tumor cells [143]. Clinical development programs need to implement proper follow-up of CAR T cell persistence kinetics to develop treatment schedules and define dosing intervals, which may differ depending on the preparation of the engineered cell product.

Preclinical and clinical testing of mRNA-encoded CARs

Early studies with TCRs specific for NY-ESO-1, MART-1 or p53 [133] and a CAR directed against CD19 [155] showed that mRNA-transfected T cells efficiently lyse antigen-expressing tumor cells. First evidence for anti-tumor effects in vivo came from PBLs transfected with mRNA encoding a HER-2/neu-specific CAR in an ovarian cancer xenograft model [134]. Clinical phase I studies explored mRNA CAR-T cells directed against various antigens (Table 2). Treatment with mRNA CAR-T cells targeting CD19 was shown to be well tolerated in pilot phase I studies in pediatric (NCT02624258) and adult (NCT02277522) patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma. Patients not only underwent lymphodepleting chemotherapy prior to CAR-T cell infusion, but also in between CAR-T cell cycles to deplete T cells that had lost CAR expression, using a lymphodepletion protocol that had enhanced the efficacy of repeated mRNA CAR-T cell delivery in preclinical models [162]. Two treatment cycles were conducted, each representing three CAR-T cell infusions 2 to 3 days apart with lymphodepletion 1 or 4 days before each cycle. One patient of four evaluable patients experienced a complete response. Assessment of CAR mRNA transcripts in the blood of this patient 2 days after each adoptive transfer confirmed the presence of the infused cells. In the remaining patients, no CAR-T cells were detected in the majority of samples taken 2 days after infusion [163].

Table 2 List of all active, completed or terminated clinical trials of mRNA CAR-T cells in cancer therapy

Two phase I studies (NCT01355965, NCT01897415) were initiated based on the observation that repeated injection of mesothelin-directed [165] mRNA CAR-T cells prevented tumor outgrowth in solid and disseminated mesothelioma xenograft models [150]. Preliminary analyses of eight out of 34 patients showed that this approach is well tolerated, with one exception: One patient experienced anaphylactic shock, most likely resulting from the induction of IgE antibodies against murine sequences in the CAR construct [158]. One patient with advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma experienced a partial response after three infusions and a second patient with metastatic pancreatic cancer had stable disease and a 40% decrease of tumor cells in ascites after receiving eight intravenous infusions followed by two intratumoral injections [159]. CAR transcripts were detectable in the blood of the patients for up to 3 days after infusion. CAR-T cells persisted longer in ascites and the primary tumor of the pancreatic cancer patient, where transcripts were detectable 6 days after intravenous or 13 days after intratumoral injection, respectively. In six other individuals with pancreatic cancer, stable disease occurred in two patients, and a third patient experienced a partial metabolic response of the target lesion [160].

In AML, lineage markers used as target antigens are expressed by hematopoietic stem cells and myeloid progenitor cells [140, 166]. Targeting antigens such as CD33 or CD123 may cause hematologic toxicity, which is less manageable than the B-cell depletion induced by targeting of CD19. Two studies showed eradication of AML xenografts assessed by CD33 [140] or CD123 [167] mRNA CAR T cells in preclinical mouse models. The self-inactivation of CD123 CAR expression allowed the subsequent recovery of the myeloid compartment by bone marrow transplantation. This approach proceeded to clinical testing in relapsed or refractory AML (NCT02623582). However, in the seven patients who received up to six infusions of CD123 mRNA CAR-T cells, no clinical benefit was observed [164].

mRNA CAR-T cells targeting protein kinase Met (c-Met) are in clinical development for the treatment of breast cancer and melanoma (NCT01837602, NCT03060356) [161], and B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-specific mRNA CAR-T cells are being developed as a treatment option for multiple myeloma (NCT03448978) [156].

mRNA CARs are also used for retargeting of γδ T cells [168, 169], NKT cells [170] and NK cells [135, 171, 172]. Besides the classical CAR construct containing an scFv as a targeting moiety, CARs featuring the extracellular domain of natural killer group 2D (NKG2D) have been engineered to recognize tumor cells that express high levels of NKG2D ligands. This approach showed promising results in preclinical studies [157]. In a clinical phase I study using CAR-NK cells (NCT03415100), preliminary signals of clinical activity were observed in three evaluated colorectal cancer patients: two experienced reduction of tumor cells in ascites and stable disease, a third patient had a complete metabolic response of a liver lesion [157].

mRNA-encoded antibodies

mRNA is also being explored for delivery of full IgG mAbs or scaffolds, including engineered bispecific antibody fragments, and addresses pharmacokinetic (e.g., short half-life, fast clearance) as well as manufacturing challenges (e.g., aggregates) to accelerate clinical development.

mAbs are an established treatment modality in cancer and are used for targeting of tumor cells and for the modulation of immune cell responses. Most of the approved recombinant mAbs are administered intravenously to achieve systemic exposure.

Established standard-of-care mAbs are obvious starting points to explore mAb-encoding mRNA in conjunction with liver-targeting formulations for high protein production in liver-resident cells and release of the protein into the circulation. Rituximab, targeting CD20, was the first mAb approved for cancer therapy and is used for the treatment of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) [173]. HER-2/neu-targeting mAb trastuzumab is approved for the treatment of HER-2/neu-overexpressing breast cancer and metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma [174]. In mice bearing human lymphoma xenografts, intravenously administered, LNP-formulated mRNA encoding rituximab induced a more pronounced anti-tumor effect compared to the recombinant protein counterpart [175]. Trastuzumab encoded on mRNA intravenously delivered with a liver-targeting LNP formulation and recovered from mouse serum exerted antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC). The treatment prolonged survival in a HER-2/neu-positive breast cancer xenograft model [176].

Engineered bispecific mAbs, comprising an anti-CD3 scFv fused to a tumor antigen-specific scFv, are able to redirect T cells to tumor cells and promote tumor cell killing [177]. The small molecular weight of bispecific mAbs allows efficient penetration of tumor tissue but comes with the drawback of a short serum half-life. mRNA with reduced immunostimulatory activity was investigated for the systemic delivery of bispecific mAbs targeting CD3 and either CLDN6, CLDN18.2 or epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) [178]. Polymer-lipid-based transfection reagent-formulated, N1-methylpseudouridine-modified and dsRNA-purified bispecific mAb-encoding mRNA (called RiboMAB) was translated in the liver after intravenous administration and resulted in sustained plasma antibody concentration over several days in mice. In contrast, non-nucleotide modified and non-dsRNA purified mRNA induced only minimal plasma concentrations of bispecific mAbs, highlighting the importance of engineering mRNA for enhanced protein production. The favorable pharmacokinetic profile of modified and purified mRNA was associated with the induction of T-cell cytotoxicity and superior anti-tumor activity against human ovarian cancer xenografts as compared to recombinant mAb.

In contrast to systemic exposure mediated through intravenous injection, local mRNA translation by direct injection into a specific tissue or by transfection of specific cell types ex vivo restricts the therapeutic activity of the translated protein to the target cells or their intermediate surroundings. Intratumoral injection of mouse tumors with an antagonistic anti-PD-L1 mAb-encoding self-amplifying (sa)RNA, which is derived from alpha- or flaviviruses and encodes both the protein of interest and a replicase for RNA amplification, resulted in superior anti-tumor efficacy compared to the intraperitoneally or intratumorally administered recombinant protein counterpart. Intratumoral saRNA administration mediated anti-PD-L1 mAb translation in transfected cells and promoted CD8+ T cell infiltration into the tumor [179].

Adoptive transfer of DCs transfected ex vivo with mRNA encoding an agonistic anti-GITR mAb delayed tumor growth in mice in the absence of an antigen-specific immunization, with efficacy being comparable to that of intravenous delivery of high amounts (1 mg) of recombinant anti-GITR mAb [180]. The administration of DCs co-transfected with mRNAs encoding an agonistic anti-GITR mAb or a soluble GITRL-Fc fusion protein, antagonistic anti-CTLA-4 mAb and Trp-2 mRNA further expanded this approach. The combined transfection of GITRL-Fc, anti-CTLA-4 mAb and Trp-2 mRNA led to significant prolonged survival of mice compared to either Trp-2 mRNA or Trp-2 and anti-CTLA-4 mAb mRNA or Trp-2 and GITRL-Fc mRNA-transfected DCs [181]. In vitro, these multi-transfected DCs improved the cytotoxicity of CTLs while inhibiting the induction of regulatory CD4+ T cells (Tregs). The concept was subsequently explored in a small trial including two patients with metastatic melanoma (NCT01216436) (Table 3).

Table 3 List of all active, completed or terminated clinical trials of mRNA antibodies and immunomodulators in cancer therapy

To increase bispecific mAb concentration and persistence in the tumor proximity, T cells were transfected with mRNA encoding the CD19-targeting bispecific T cell enganger (BiTE) blinatumomab approved for the treatment of certain types of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Secretion of the BiTE led to the release of inflammatory cytokines and efficient killing of tumor cells by transfected T cells in vitro [183]. These observations correlated with enhanced in vivo anti-tumor efficacy upon infusion of mRNA-electroporated T cells in a mouse model of leukemia.

mRNA-encoded immunomodulators

mRNA-encoded immunomodulators investigated so far comprise cytokines as well as co-stimulatory ligands and receptors (see Table 3 for those in clinical development).

When using mRNA to produce immunomodulators in vivo, a high protein yield is desirable. The majority of studies that relied on mRNA translation upon intravenous or intratumoral administration used nucleoside-modified mRNA, while approaches involving ex vivo transfected target cells did not attempt to attenuate the inherent immunostimulatory activity of the mRNA.


Recombinant T cell-stimulating cytokines are a preclinically validated treatment concept [184,185,186], the clinical development of which is hampered by substantial toxicity.

IL-2 is a key cytokine involved in differentiation, proliferation, survival and effector function of T cells and has been approved for the treatment of melanoma and RCC [187]. Major limitations of recombinant IL-2 are its preferential stimulation of Treg expansion and its short serum half-life, demanding high and frequent dosing which in turn potentiates adverse effects. The rationale for using mRNA to express IL-2 in vivo is to prolong the production of the cytokine, reducing peak serum concentration in favor of protracted activity. Two IL-2 encoding investigational nucleoside-modified RNA-LNP products are in development. One encodes an IL-2 with an extended half-life and is developed in combination with an IL-7 encoding RNA-LNP [188, 189]. In mice, systemic administration of these two cytokine RNA-LNPs synergistically enhanced vaccine-mediated induction of antigen-specific CD8+ T cells and increased the ratio of antigen-specific CD8+ T cells over Tregs, translating into superior control of syngeneic tumors. The second RNA-LNP codes for an engineered IL-2 variant with reduced Treg bias [188, 189]. The IL-2 variant was generated by rational design with the objective of decreasing the binding affinity to the IL-2 receptor (IL-2R) α chain primarily expressed by Tregs, and increasing the binding affinity to the IL-2Rβ chain expressed by all T cells, including effector T cells. In syngeneic tumor-bearing mice, intravenous administration of the IL-2 variant RNA-LNP expanded spontaneous anti-tumor T-cell responses without significant elevation of Tregs, leading to a strong increase of the CD8+ T cell to Treg ratio. The IL-2 variant RNA-LNP proved effective in syngeneic mouse tumor models, and the anti-tumor effect was significantly enhanced in combination with RNA-LPX vaccination or PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibition.

IL-15 is functionally related to IL-2, as both signal via IL-2Rβ and the common γ chain (IL-2Rβγ), and thereby stimulate T cells and NK cells [190]. Whereas IL-2 is crucial for the development and homeostasis of Tregs and supports AICD to control auto-reactive T cells, IL-15 prolongs the survival of CD8+ memory T cells [191]. IL-15 has a short serum half-life and cancer patients that received intravenous infusion of recombinant IL-15 experienced dose-limiting toxicity [192]. Signaling is induced when IL-15 presented on membrane-associated IL-15Rα binds IL-2Rβγ receptor complexes on T cells in trans. To avoid systemic exposure to IL-15, CD8+ T cells were transfected ex vivo with mRNA encoding an IL-15-IL-15Rα fusion construct (IL-15sushi). Autonomous stimulation of the trimeric IL-15R in cis enhanced the cytotoxicity of the T cells in vitro and when administered to mice, these cells proliferated better [193].

IL-12 is a potent mediator of TH1 immunity and exerts significant anti-tumor activity in mouse tumor models. In humans, IL-12 is associated with potentially lethal toxicity upon systemic administration [194, 195]. One study investigated T cells transfected with mRNA encoding a single-chain IL-12 (scIL-12) consisting of the p35 and p40 subunits. Intratumoral injection of scIL-12-expressing T cells resulted in complete rejection of both injected and distant tumor lesions in syngeneic and xenograft mouse models. Co-electroporation of T cells with 4-1BBL mRNA further increased anti-tumor efficacy [196]. Local expression of IL-12 was also achieved through intratumoral delivery of LNPs containing scIL-12 N1-methylpseudouridine-modified mRNA. In mouse tumor models, a single intratumoral injection promoted tumor regression, which required IFNγ and CD8+ T cells [197]. In a corresponding phase I clinical trial, the human scIL-12 MEDI1191 is being evaluated in patients with solid tumors (NCT03946800). In a different approach, N1-methylpseudouridine-modified scIL-12 RNA-LNPs administered intravenously to mice bearing hepatocellular carcinomas reduced liver tumor burden and prolonged survival, without apparent liver toxicity [198]. Reporter mRNA-containing LNPs demonstrated that the translated protein was confined to the tumors and non-malignant regions of the liver and the spleen.

Various mRNAs can be easily mixed and formulated together as a single drug product, a technological property that has encouraged the development of combinatorial approaches. Intratumoral administration of LNP-formulated N1-methylpseudouridine-modified mRNAs encoding IL-36γ (a pro-inflammatory cytokine acting as alarmin), IL-23 (a regulator of inflammation) and OX40L demonstrated regression of established tumors in three syngeneic tumor models [199]. Inflammatory cytokines and chemokines in the tumor microenvironment (TME) and recruitment and activation of multiple DC and T cell types increased upon triplet mRNA treatment. These cytokine responses were reproduced in human cell culture studies. A phase I dose escalation study is evaluating the mixture alone or in combination with durvalumab in 126 patients with relapsed/refractory solid tumors or lymphoma (NCT03739931) [182]. Dose expansion cohorts contain patients with TNBC, HNSCC, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and urothelial cancer. In addition, a mix of scIL-12, IL-15sushi, GM-CSF and IFNα mRNA alone or in combination with cemiplimab is being tested in a phase I clinical trial in 231 patients with metastatic neoplasms (NCT03871348) [200].

In a combination approach using a single mRNA construct, IFNβ was fused with the ectodomain of the transforming growth factor (TGF) β receptor II to stimulate innate immunity while antagonizing the suppressive function of TGFβ [201]. In vitro, the fusion construct increased surface expression of MHC class I and PD-L1 by tumor cells, improved T-cell priming by DCs, and diminished the suppressive capacity of myeloid-derived suppressor cells. This pharmacological profile resulted in tumor growth delay in syngeneic tumor models.

Stimulatory ligands and receptors

Interactions of stimulatory ligands and receptors provide inflammatory signals to the immune system that can be exploited for cancer immunotherapy. mRNA can be used to transiently equip cells with stimulatory receptors, enabling transient activation of strong inflammatory signals.

Modification of intracellular receptor domains to generate ca receptors is helpful to provide cells with autonomous stimuli. The transfection of T cells, isolated either from PBLs or tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), with caTLR4 mRNA, caCD40 mRNA, or both, enhanced the production of IFNγ and TNFα, upregulated 4-1BB and CD25, and increased the cytolytic activity against autologous melanoma cells in vitro [202, 203]. Building on this strategy, the authors of these studies added cytokine mRNAs coding for membrane-anchored variants of IL-2, scIL-12 and IL-15. The membrane-associated cytokines bound their corresponding surface receptors mainly in cis. Co-transfection of cytokine mRNAs with caTLR4 mRNA, caCD40 mRNA, or both, enhanced IFNγ production by T cells, induced upregulation of T cell activation molecules (CD25, 4-1BB, OX40), and improved the cytotoxicity of TILs against autologous melanoma cells in vitro in comparison to cells transfected with caTLR4 mRNA, caCD40 mRNA, or both [204, 205].

The transient nature of mRNA translation is appealing for the direct in vivo delivery of stimulatory ligand and receptor-coding mRNA. The injection of naked TriMix mRNA (caTLR4 and co-stimulatory ligands CD70 and CD40L; as described above) directly into the tumor resulted in systemic therapeutic anti-tumor activity in various mouse models and led to a phase I clinical trial in patients with early, resectable breast cancer lesions (NCT03788083) [206]. In addition, LNP-formulated OX40L mRNA entered clinical phase I development in patients with relapsed/refractory solid tumors, lymphoma and ovarian cancer, alone or in combination with durvalumab (NCT03323398). So far, OX40L monotherapy proved to be safe while exerting pro-inflammatory activity in the injected tumor lesions [207].

Resorting to the combination of co-stimulatory ligands and receptors (CD70, OX40L, CD80, CD86), as well as cytokines (IL-12, IFNγ), different mixtures of formulated 5′-methylcytidine- and pseudouridine-modified mRNAs were injected directly into mouse tumors. Among all tested combinations, the triplet of OX40L, CD80 and CD86 mRNA induced the strongest anti-tumor immunity in subcutaneous A20 and CT26 tumor-bearing mice [208].


The development and worldwide approval or authorization of mRNA vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 within less than 1 year upon occurrence of the COVID-19 pandemic showcased the enormous potential of mRNA technology. COVID-19 mRNA vaccines were rapidly developed, have a favorable safety profile, and outperform established technologies with efficacies around 95% of preventing COVID-19 [24, 114].

This rapid response to the pandemic leveraged the rich source of scientific, clinical, manufacturing and regulatory lessons learned over decades of exploring mRNA technology for the design and clinical development of therapeutic cancer vaccines. In turn, the insights gained in the process of advancing mRNA for the first time through all stages of pharmaceutical drug development to a commercial product will now feed back into its application for cancer immunotherapy.

The beauty of mRNA technology is the broad bandwidth of its versatility. By modifying building blocks, structural elements, and formulations of the synthetic mRNA, a variety of features including targeting to defined cells, duration of expression, and immunological effects can be adapted. This expands the design space for mRNA beyond therapeutic cancer vaccination. mRNA is now utilized for the most diverse immunotherapeutic approaches, including the equipping of immune cells with antigen receptors and the in vivo production of therapeutic proteins such as antibodies or immunomodulators. mRNA CAR-T cells have the potential to improve the safety profile of CAR-T cell therapy and allow concurrent modification of the lymphocytes by co-delivery of additional mRNAs. mRNA-based immunomodulators successfully entered clinical testing. Intratumoral injection of mRNA-encoded cytokines and co-stimulatory ligands demonstrated feasibility and induction of anti-tumor immune responses.

mRNA is expected to become one of the major pillars of drug development. With an increasing number of concepts entering clinical trials, the first approval of an mRNA therapeutic against cancer is nearing.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.



Adoptive cell transfer


Antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity


Activation-induced cell death


Acute lymphoblastic leukemia


Acute myeloid leukemia


Antigen-presenting cell


Area under the curve


B-cell maturation antigen


Bispecific T cell engager


B cell maturation antigen


Constitutively active


Chimeric antigen receptor


CD40 ligand


Carcinoembryonic antigen


Claudin 6


Mannose receptors and C-type lectin domain family 9


Chronic lymphocytic leukemia


Protein kinase Met


Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4


Dendritic cell


Decoy receptor 3




Epithelial cell adhesion molecule


Enzyme-linked immune absorbent spot


Glucocorticoid-induced tumor necrosis factor receptor


Glucocorticoid-induced tumor necrosis factor receptor ligand


Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor


Human cytomegalovirus


Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2


Human leukocyte antigen


Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma


Human papilloma virus


Human telomerase reverse transcriptase












Inducible T cell co-stimulatory ligand




Inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa-B kinase subunit beta




IL-2 receptor


Individualized neoantigen-specific immunotherapy


IFN-stimulated gene


In vitro transcription


Lysosome-associated membrane protein


Major histocompatibility complex


Lipid nanoparticle


Monoclonal antibody


Melanoma-associated antigen


Melanoma antigen recognized by T cells


Melanoma differentiation-associated protein 5


Metastatic renal cell carcinoma


Messenger RNA


Mucin 1




Natural killer


Natural killer group 2D


Non-small-cell lung cancer


New York esophageal squamous cell carcinoma-1


2′,5′-oligoadenylate synthetase


OX40 ligand


Prostatic acid phosphatase


Programmed cell death protein 1


Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma


Polyethylene glycol


Prostaglandin E2


IFN-inducible double-stranded RNA-activated protein kinase


Programmed cell death ligand 1


Melanoma antigen preferentially expressed in tumors


Pattern recognition receptors


Prostate-specific antigen


Prostate stem cell antigen


Prostate-specific membrane antigen


Renal cell carcinoma


Retinoic acid-inducible gene 1


Liposome-formulated mRNA




Single chain


Single-chain variable fragment




6-transmembrane epithelial antigen of prostate


Stimulator of interferon gene


Tumor-associated antigen


T cell receptor


Tetanus-diphtheria toxoid


Transforming growth factor


Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes


Toll-like receptor


Tumor microenvironment


Triple-negative breast cancer


Tumor necrosis factor


Trophoblast glycoprotein


Transmembrane phosphatase with tensin homology


Regulatory CD4+ T cell


CD40L, CD70 and constitutively active TLR4 mRNA


Tyrosinase-related protein-2


Tumor-specific antigen


Untranslated region


WILMS’ tumor 1


4-1BB ligand


  1. Kuhn AN, Diken M, Kreiter S, Selmi A, Kowalska J, JEMIELITY J, et al. Phosphorothioate cap analogs increase stability and translational efficiency of RNA vaccines in immature dendritic cells and induce superior immune responses in vivo. Gene Ther. 2010;17(8):961–71. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Strenkowska M, Grzela R, Majewski M, Wnek K, Kowalska J, Lukaszewicz M, Zuberek J, Darzynkiewicz E, Kuhn AN, Sahin U, Jemielity J. Cap analogs modified with 1,2-dithiodiphosphate moiety protect mRNA from decapping and enhance its translational potential. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44(20):9578–90. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Rehwinkel J, Tan CP, Goubau D, Schulz O, Pichlmair A, Bier K, et al. RIG-I detects viral genomic RNA during negative-strand RNA virus infection. Cell. 2010;140(3):397–408.

  4. Nallagatla SR, Toroney R, Bevilacqua PC. A brilliant disguise for self RNA: 5′-end and internal modifications of primary transcripts suppress elements of innate immunity. RNA Biol. 2008;5(3):140–4. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Holtkamp S, Kreiter S, Selmi A, Simon P, Koslowski M, Huber C, Türeci Ö, Sahin U. Modification of antigen-encoding RNA increases stability, translational efficacy, and T-cell stimulatory capacity of dendritic cells. Blood. 2006;108(13):4009–17. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kuhn AN, Beißert T, Simon P, Vallazza B, Buck J, Davies BP, et al. mRNA as a versatile tool for exogenous protein expression. Curr Gene Ther. 2012;12(5):347–61. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sample PJ, Wang B, Reid DW, Presnyak V, McFadyen IJ, Morris DR, et al. Human 5′ UTR design and variant effect prediction from a massively parallel translation assay. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37(7):803–9. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Jia L, Mao Y, Ji Q, Dersh D, Yewdell JW, Qian S-B. Decoding mRNA translatability and stability from the 5′ UTR. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2020;27(9):814–21. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen C-YA, Shyu A-B. AU-rich elements: characterization and importance in mRNA degradation. Trends Biochem Sci. 1995;20(11):465–70. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bernstein P, Peltz SW, Ross J. The poly(a)-poly(a)-binding protein complex is a major determinant of mRNA stability in vitro. Mol Cell Biol. 1989;9(2):659–70. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Mockey M, Gonçalves C, Dupuy FP, Lemoine FM, Pichon C, Midoux P. mRNA transfection of dendritic cells: synergistic effect of ARCA mRNA capping with poly(a) chains in cis and in trans for a high protein expression level. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2006;340(4):1062–8. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cannarozzi G, Schraudolph NN, Faty M, von Rohr P, Friberg MT, Roth AC, Gonnet P, Gonnet G, Barral Y. A role for codon order in translation dynamics. Cell. 2010;141(2):355–67. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pastor F, Berraondo P, Etxeberria I, Frederick J, Sahin U, Gilboa E, Melero I. An RNA toolbox for cancer immunotherapy. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2018;17(10):751–67. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kroczynska B, Mehrotra S, Arslan AD, Kaur S, Platanias LC. Regulation of interferon-dependent mRNA translation of target genes. J Interf Cytokine Res. 2014;34(4):289–96. .

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Munir M, Berg M. The multiple faces of proteinkinase R in antiviral defense. Virulence. 2013;4(1):85–9. .

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Karikó K, Buckstein M, Ni H, Weissman D. Suppression of RNA recognition by toll-like receptors: the impact of nucleoside modification and the evolutionary origin of RNA. Immunity. 2005;23(2):165–75. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Karikó K, Muramatsu H, Welsh FA, Ludwig J, Kato H, Akira S, Weissman D. Incorporation of Pseudouridine into mRNA yields superior nonimmunogenic vector with increased translational capacity and biological stability. Mol Ther. 2008;16(11):1833–40. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Karikó K, Muramatsu H, Keller JM, Weissman D. Increased erythropoiesis in mice injected with submicrogram quantities of Pseudouridine-containing mRNA encoding erythropoietin. Mol Ther. 2012;20(5):948–53. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Andries O, Mc Cafferty S, de Smedt SC, Weiss R, Sanders NN, Kitada T. N(1)-methylpseudouridine-incorporated mRNA outperforms pseudouridine-incorporated mRNA by providing enhanced protein expression and reduced immunogenicity in mammalian cell lines and mice. J Control Release. 2015;217:337–44. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Baiersdörfer M, Boros G, Muramatsu H, Mahiny A, Vlatkovic I, Sahin U, Karikó K. A facile method for the removal of dsRNA contaminant from in vitro-transcribed mRNA. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2019;15:26–35. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Karikó K, Muramatsu H, Ludwig J, Weissman D. Generating the optimal mRNA for therapy: HPLC purification eliminates immune activation and improves translation of nucleoside-modified, protein-encoding mRNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39(21):e142. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Walsh EE, Frenck RW, Falsey AR, Kitchin N, Absalon J, Gurtman A, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of two RNA-based Covid-19 vaccine candidates. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(25):2439–50. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Anderson EJ, Rouphael NG, Widge AT, Jackson LA, Roberts PC, Makhene M, Chappell JD, Denison MR, Stevens LJ, Pruijssers AJ, McDermott A, Flach B, Lin BC, Doria-Rose NA, O'Dell S, Schmidt SD, Corbett KS, Swanson PA 2nd, Padilla M, Neuzil KM, Bennett H, Leav B, Makowski M, Albert J, Cross K, Edara VV, Floyd K, Suthar MS, Martinez DR, Baric R, Buchanan W, Luke CJ, Phadke VK, Rostad CA, Ledgerwood JE, Graham BS, Beigel JH, mRNA-1273 Study Group. Safety and immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA-1273 vaccine in older adults. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(25):2427–38. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N, Absalon J, Gurtman A, Lockhart S, Perez JL, Pérez Marc G, Moreira ED, Zerbini C, Bailey R, Swanson KA, Roychoudhury S, Koury K, Li P, Kalina WV, Cooper D, Frenck RW Jr, Hammitt LL, Türeci Ö, Nell H, Schaefer A, Ünal S, Tresnan DB, Mather S, Dormitzer PR, Şahin U, Jansen KU, Gruber WC, C4591001 Clinical Trial Group. Safety and efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 vaccine. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(27):2603–15. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Conry RM, et al. Characterization of a messenger RNA polynucleotide vaccine vector. Cancer Res. 1995;55:1397–400 Cancer Res 1995; 55:1397.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Boczkowski D, Nair SK, Snyder D, Gilboa E. Dendritic cells pulsed with RNA are potent antigen-presenting cells in vitro and in vivo. J Exp Med. 1996;184(2):465–72. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Anguille S, van de Velde AL, Smits EL, van Tendeloo VF, Juliusson G, Cools N, Nijs G, Stein B, Lion E, van Driessche A, Vandenbosch I, Verlinden A, Gadisseur AP, Schroyens WA, Muylle L, Vermeulen K, Maes MB, Deiteren K, Malfait R, Gostick E, Lammens M, Couttenye MM, Jorens P, Goossens H, Price DA, Ladell K, Oka Y, Fujiki F, Oji Y, Sugiyama H, Berneman ZN. Dendritic cell vaccination as postremission treatment to prevent or delay relapse in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2017;130(15):1713–21. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Amin A, Dudek AZ, Logan TF, Lance RS, Holzbeierlein JM, Knox JJ, Master VA, Pal SK, Miller WH, Karsh LI, Tcherepanova IY, DeBenedette MA, Williams WL, Plessinger DC, Nicolette CA, Figlin RA. Survival with AGS-003, an autologous dendritic cell-based immunotherapy, in combination with sunitinib in unfavorable risk patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC): phase 2 study results. J Immunother Cancer. 2015;3(1):14. .

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Figlin RA, Tannir NM, Uzzo RG, Tykodi SS, Chen DYT, Master V, Kapoor A, Vaena D, Lowrance W, Bratslavsky G, DeBenedette M, Gamble A, Plachco A, Norris MS, Horvatinovich J, Tcherepanova IY, Nicolette CA, Wood CG, ADAPT study group. Results of the ADAPT phase 3 study of Rocapuldencel-T in combination with Sunitinib as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2020;26(10):2327–36. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Figlin R, Nicolette C, Tannir N, Tykodi SS, Chen D, Master V, Lane B, Debenedette M, Monesmith T, Tan W, Leland S, Wood CG. Interim analysis of the phase 3 ADAPT trial evaluating rocapuldencel-T (AGS-003), an individualized immunotherapy for the treatment of newly-diagnosed patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Ann Oncol. 2017;28:v404. .

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Khoury HJ, Collins RH, Blum W, Stiff PS, Elias L, Lebkowski JS, et al. Immune responses and long-term disease recurrence status after telomerase-based dendritic cell immunotherapy in patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer. 2017;123(16):3061–72. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Mitchell DA, Batich KA, Gunn MD, Huang M-N, Sanchez-Perez L, Nair SK, Congdon KL, Reap EA, Archer GE, Desjardins A, Friedman AH, Friedman HS, Herndon II JE, Coan A, McLendon RE, Reardon DA, Vredenburgh JJ, Bigner DD, Sampson JH. Tetanus toxoid and CCL3 improve dendritic cell vaccines in mice and glioblastoma patients. Nature. 2015;519(7543):366–9. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Batich KA, Mitchell DA, Healy P, Herndon JE, Sampson JH. Once, twice, three times a finding: reproducibility of dendritic cell vaccine trials targeting Cytomegalovirus in Glioblastoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2020;26(20):5297–303. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kongsted P, Borch TH, Ellebaek E, Iversen TZ, Andersen R, Met Ö, et al. Dendritic cell vaccination in combination with docetaxel for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a randomized phase II study. Cytotherapy. 2017;19(4):5–513.

  35. Boudewijns S, Bloemendal M, de Haas N, Westdorp H, Bol KF, Schreibelt G, Aarntzen EHJG, Lesterhuis WJ, Gorris MAJ, Croockewit A, van der Woude LL, van Rossum MM, Welzen M, de Goede A, Hato SV, van der Graaf WTA, Punt CJA, Koornstra RHT, Gerritsen WR, Figdor CG, de Vries IJM. Autologous monocyte-derived DC vaccination combined with cisplatin in stage III and IV melanoma patients: a prospective, randomized phase 2 trial. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2020;69(3):477–88. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Gururangan S, Elias Sayour E, Mitchell DA. Total tumor RNA pulsed dendritic cells plus adoptive transfer of ex-vivo enriched autologous T-lymphocytes in the treatment of children with primary brain tumors. NN. 2018;5(10):45. .

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Wilgenhof S, Corthals J, Heirman C, van Baren N, Lucas S, Kvistborg P, Thielemans K, Neyns B. Phase II study of autologous monocyte-derived mRNA Electroporated dendritic cells (TriMixDC-MEL) plus Ipilimumab in patients with Pretreated advanced melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(12):1330–8. .

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. de Keersmaecker B, Claerhout S, Carrasco J, Bar I, Corthals J, Wilgenhof S, et al. TriMix and tumor antigen mRNA electroporated dendritic cell vaccination plus ipilimumab: link between T-cell activation and clinical responses in advanced melanoma. J Immunother Cancer. 2020;8(1):e000329.

  39. Wilgenhof S, Corthals J, Heirman C, Neyns B, Thielemans K. Clinical trials with MRNA electroporated dendritic cells for stage III/IV melanoma patients. J Immunother Cancer. 2015;3(Suppl 2):P211. .

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Kranz LM, Diken M, Haas H, Kreiter S, Loquai C, Reuter KC, Meng M, Fritz D, Vascotto F, Hefesha H, Grunwitz C, Vormehr M, Hüsemann Y, Selmi A, Kuhn AN, Buck J, Derhovanessian E, Rae R, Attig S, Diekmann J, Jabulowsky RA, Heesch S, Hassel J, Langguth P, Grabbe S, Huber C, Türeci Ö, Sahin U. Systemic RNA delivery to dendritic cells exploits antiviral defence for cancer immunotherapy. Nature. 2016;534(7607):396–401. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Sahin U, Oehm P, Derhovanessian E, Jabulowsky RA, Vormehr M, Gold M, Maurus D, Schwarck-Kokarakis D, Kuhn AN, Omokoko T, Kranz LM, Diken M, Kreiter S, Haas H, Attig S, Rae R, Cuk K, Kemmer-Brück A, Breitkreuz A, Tolliver C, Caspar J, Quinkhardt J, Hebich L, Stein M, Hohberger A, Vogler I, Liebig I, Renken S, Sikorski J, Leierer M, Müller V, Mitzel-Rink H, Miederer M, Huber C, Grabbe S, Utikal J, Pinter A, Kaufmann R, Hassel JC, Loquai C, Türeci Ö. An RNA vaccine drives immunity in checkpoint-inhibitor-treated melanoma. Nature. 2020;585(7823):107–12. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Koch SD, Hong H, Feyerabend S, Retz M, Kuebler H, Heidenreich A, van Erps T, Schroeder A, Scheel B, Reus V, Kallen KJ, Fotin-Mleczek M, Gnad-Vogt U, Stenzl A. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase I/II trial of RNActive®-vaccine cv9104 in patients with metastatic castrate-refractory prostate cancer (mcrpc): first results of the phase I part. J Immunother Cancer. 2014;2(Suppl 3):P85. .

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Stenzl A, Feyerabend S, Syndikus I, Sarosiek T, Kübler H, Heidenreich A, Cathomas R, Grüllich C, Loriot Y, Perez Gracia SL, Gillessen S, Klinkhardt U, Schröder A, Schönborn-Kellenberger O, Reus V, Koch SD, Hong HS, Seibel T, Fizazi K, Gnad-Vogt U. Results of the randomized, placebo-controlled phase I/IIB trial of CV9104, an mRNA based cancer immunotherapy, in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Ann Oncol. 2017;28:v408–9. .

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Kübler H, Scheel B, Gnad-Vogt U, Miller K, Schultze-Seemann W, Vom Dorp F, et al. Self-adjuvanted mRNA vaccination in advanced prostate cancer patients: a first-in-man phase I/IIa study. J Immunother Cancer. 2015;3(1):26. .

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Arance Fernandez AMA, Baurain J-F, Vulsteke C, Rutten A, Soria A, Carrasco J, et al. A phase I study (E011-MEL) of a TriMix-based mRNA immunotherapy (ECI-006) in resected melanoma patients: Analysis of safety and immunogenicity. JCO. 2019;37(15_suppl):2641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Howard A. Burris. A phase 1 multicenter study to assess the safety, tolerability and immunogenicity of mRNA-4157 alone in patients with resected solid tumors and in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with unresectable solid tumors. Available from: URL:

  47. Perez CR, de Palma M. Engineering dendritic cell vaccines to improve cancer immunotherapy. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):5408. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Su Z, Dannull J, Heiser A, Yancey D, Pruitt S, Madden J, Coleman D, Niedzwiecki D, Gilboa E, Vieweg J. Immunological and clinical responses in metastatic renal cancer patients vaccinated with tumor RNA-transfected dendritic cells. Cancer Res. 2003;63(9):2127–33.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Caruso DA, Orme LM, Neale A, Radcliff FJ, Amor GM, Maixner W, et al. Results of a phase 1 study utilizing monocyte-derived dendritic cells pulsed with tumor RNA in children and young adults with brain cancer. Neuro Oncol. 2004;6(3):236–46.

  50. Caruso DA, Orme LM, Amor GM, Neale A, Radcliff FJ, Downie P, et al. Results of a Phase I study utilizing monocyte-derived dendritic cells pulsed with tumor RNA in children with Stage 4 neuroblastoma. Cancer. 2005;103(6):1280–91.

  51. Kyte JA, Mu L, Aamdal S, Kvalheim G, Dueland S, Hauser M, Gullestad HP, Ryder T, Lislerud K, Hammerstad H, Gaudernack G. Phase I/II trial of melanoma therapy with dendritic cells transfected with autologous tumor-mRNA. Cancer Gene Ther. 2006;13(10):905–18. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Mu LJ, Kyte JA, Kvalheim G, Aamdal S, Dueland S, Hauser M, Hammerstad H, Waehre H, Raabe N, Gaudernack G. Immunotherapy with allotumour mRNA-transfected dendritic cells in androgen-resistant prostate cancer patients. Br J Cancer. 2005;93(7):749–56. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Kyte JA, Aamdal S, Dueland S, Sæbøe-Larsen S, Inderberg EM, Madsbu UE, Skovlund E, Gaudernack G, Kvalheim G. Immune response and long-term clinical outcome in advanced melanoma patients vaccinated with tumor-mRNA-transfected dendritic cells. OncoImmunology. 2016;5(11):e1232237. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Javorovic M, Pohla H, Frankenberger B, Wölfel T, Schendel DJ. RNA transfer by electroporation into mature dendritic cells leading to reactivation of effector-memory cytotoxic T lymphocytes: a quantitative analysis. Mol Ther. 2005;12(4):734–43. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Heiser A, Coleman D, Dannull J, Yancey D, Maurice MA, Lallas CD, Dahm P, Niedzwiecki D, Gilboa E, Vieweg J. Autologous dendritic cells transfected with prostate-specific antigen RNA stimulate CTL responses against metastatic prostate tumors. J Clin Investig. 2002;109(3):409–17. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Morse MA, Nair SK, Mosca PJ, Hobeika AC, Clay TM, Deng Y, et al. Immunotherapy with autologous, human dendritic cells transfected with Carcinoembryonic antigen mRNA. Cancer Investig. 2003;21(3):341–9. .

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Lesterhuis WJ, de Vries IJM, Schreibelt G, Schuurhuis DH, Aarntzen EH, de Boer A, Scharenborg NM, van de Rakt M, Hesselink EJ, Figdor CG, Adema GJ, Punt CJ. Immunogenicity of dendritic cells pulsed with CEA peptide or transfected with CEA mRNA for vaccination of colorectal cancer patients. Anticancer Res. 2010;30(12):5091–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Aarntzen EHJG, Schreibelt G, Bol K, Lesterhuis WJ, Croockewit AJ, de Wilt JHW, et al. Vaccination with mRNA-Electroporated dendritic cells induces robust tumor antigen-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells responses in stage III and IV melanoma patients. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18(19):5460–70. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Bol KF, Mensink HW, Aarntzen EHJG, Schreibelt G, Keunen JEE, Coulie PG, de Klein A, Punt CJA, Paridaens D, Figdor CG, de Vries IJM. Long overall survival after dendritic cell vaccination in metastatic uveal melanoma patients. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014;158(5):939–47. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Bol KF, van den Bosch T, Schreibelt G, Mensink HW, Keunen JE, Kiliç E, et al. Adjuvant Dendritic Cell Vaccination in High-Risk Uveal Melanoma. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(10):2265–7.

  61. Su Z, Dannull J, Yang BK, Dahm P, Coleman D, Yancey D, Sichi S, Niedzwiecki D, Boczkowski D, Gilboa E, Vieweg J. Telomerase mRNA-transfected dendritic cells stimulate antigen-specific CD8+ and CD4+ T cell responses in patients with metastatic prostate Cancer. J Immunol. 2005;174(6):3798–807.

  62. van Tendeloo VF, van de Velde A, van Driessche A, Cools N, Anguille S, Ladell K, Gostick E, Vermeulen K, Pieters K, Nijs G, Stein B, Smits EL, Schroyens WA, Gadisseur AP, Vrelust I, Jorens PG, Goossens H, de Vries IJ, Price DA, Oji Y, Oka Y, Sugiyama H, Berneman ZN. Induction of complete and molecular remissions in acute myeloid leukemia by Wilms' tumor 1 antigen-targeted dendritic cell vaccination. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2010;107(31):13824–9. .

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Bol KF, Aarntzen EHJG, Hout FEMI't, Schreibelt G, Creemers JHA, Lesterhuis WJ, et al. Favorable overall survival in stage III melanoma patients after adjuvant dendritic cell vaccination. OncoImmunology. 2016;5(1):e1057673.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Gu Y-Z, Zhao X, Song X-R. Ex vivo pulsed dendritic cell vaccination against cancer. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2020;41(7):959–69. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Wu TC, Guarnieri FG, Staveley-O'Carroll KF, Viscidi RP, Levitsky HI, Hedrick L, Cho KR, August JT, Pardoll DM. Engineering an intracellular pathway for major histocompatibility complex class II presentation of antigens. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92(25):11671–5. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Bonehill A, Heirman C, Tuyaerts S, Michiels A, Breckpot K, Brasseur F, Zhang Y, van der Bruggen P, Thielemans K. Messenger RNA-electroporated dendritic cells presenting MAGE-A3 simultaneously in HLA class I and class II molecules. J Immunol. 2004;172(11):6649–57. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Kreiter S, Selmi A, Diken M, Sebastian M, Osterloh P, Schild H, et al. Increased antigen presentation efficiency by coupling antigens to MHC class I trafficking signals. J Immunol. 2007;180(1):309–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Nair SK, Boczkowski D, Morse M, Cumming RI, Lyerly HK, Gilboa E. Induction of primary carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes in vitro using human dendritic cells transfected with RNA. Nat Biotechnol. 1998;16(4):364–9. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Peters KB, Archer GE, Norberg P, Xie W, Threatt S, Lipp ES, et al. Safety of nivolumab in combination with dendritic cell vaccines in recurrent high-grade glioma. JCO. 2019;37(15\_suppl):e13526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Vlahovic G, Archer GE, Reap E, Desjardins A, Peters KB, Randazzo D, et al. Phase I trial of combination of antitumor immunotherapy targeted against cytomegalovirus (CMV) plus regulatory T-cell inhibition in patients with newly-diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). JCO. 2016;34(15\_suppl):e13518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Dannull J, Nair S, Su Z, Boczkowski D, DeBeck C, Yang B, Gilboa E, Vieweg J. Enhancing the immunostimulatory function of dendritic cells by transfection with mRNA encoding OX40 ligand. Blood. 2005;105(8):3206–13. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Grünebach F, Kayser K, Weck MM, Müller MR, Appel S, Brossart P. Cotransfection of dendritic cells with RNA coding for HER-2/neu and 4-1BBL increases the induction of tumor antigen specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes. Cancer Gene Ther. 2005;12(9):749–56. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Tuyaerts S, van Meirvenne S, Bonehill A, Heirman C, Corthals J, Waldmann H, Breckpot K, Thielemans K, Aerts JL. Expression of human GITRL on myeloid dendritic cells enhances their immunostimulatory function but does not abrogate the suppressive effect of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells. J Leukoc Biol. 2007;82(1):93–105. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Tcherepanova IY, Adams MD, Feng X, Hinohara A, Horvatinovich J, Calderhead D, Healey D, Nicolette CA. Ectopic expression of a truncated CD40L protein from synthetic post-transcriptionally capped RNA in dendritic cells induces high levels of IL-12 secretion. BMC Mol Biol. 2008;9(1):90. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Daneshmandi S, Pourfathollah AA, Forouzandeh-Moghaddam M. Enhanced CD40 and ICOSL expression on dendritic cells surface improve anti-tumor immune responses; effectiveness of mRNA/chitosan nanoparticles. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol. 2018;40(5):375–86. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Levin N, Pato A, Cafri G, Eisenberg G, Peretz T, Margalit A, Lotem M, Gross G. Spontaneous activation of antigen-presenting cells by genes encoding truncated homo-Oligomerizing derivatives of CD40. J Immunother. 2017;40(2):39–50. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Bonehill A, Tuyaerts S, Van Nuffel AMT, Heirman C, Bos TJ, Fostier K, et al. Enhancing the T-cell stimulatory capacity of human dendritic cells by co-electroporation with CD40L, CD70 and constitutively active TLR4 encoding mRNA. Mol Ther. 2008;16(6):1170–80. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Bonehill A, van Nuffel AMT, Corthals J, Tuyaerts S, Heirman C, Francois V, et al. Single-step antigen loading and activation of dendritic cells by mRNA electroporation for the purpose of therapeutic vaccination in melanoma patients. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15(10):3366–75. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Pen JJ, de Keersmaecker B, Maenhout SK, Van Nuffel AMT, Heirman C, Corthals J, et al. Modulation of regulatory T cell function by monocyte-derived dendritic cells matured through electroporation with mRNA encoding CD40 ligand, constitutively active TLR4, and CD70. J Immunol. 2013;191(4):1976–83. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Naka T, Iwahashi M, Nakamura M, Ojima T, Nakamori M, Ueda K, Katsuda M, Miyazawa M, Ishida K, Yamaue H. Tumor vaccine therapy against recrudescent tumor using dendritic cells simultaneously transfected with tumor RNA and granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor RNA. Cancer Sci. 2008;99(2):407–13. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Bontkes HJ, Kramer D, Ruizendaal JJ, Kueter EWM, van Tendeloo VFI, Meijer CJLM, et al. Dendritic cells transfected with interleukin-12 and tumor-associated antigen messenger RNA induce high avidity cytotoxic T cells. Gene Ther. 2006;14(4):366–75. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Minkis K, Kavanagh DG, Alter G, Bogunovic D, O'Neill D, Adams S, Pavlick A, Walker BD, Brockman MA, Gandhi RT, Bhardwaj N. Type 2 Bias of T cells expanded from the blood of melanoma patients switched to type 1 by IL-12p70 mRNA-transfected dendritic cells. Cancer Res. 2008;68(22):9441–50. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. van den Bergh J, Willemen Y, Lion E, van Acker H, de Reu H, Anguille S, Goossens H, Berneman Z, van Tendeloo V, Smits E. Transpresentation of interleukin-15 by IL-15/IL-15Rα mRNA-engineered human dendritic cells boosts antitumoral natural killer cell activity. Oncotarget. 2015;6(42):44123–33. .

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. van den Bergh JMJ, Smits ELJM, Versteven M, de Reu H, Berneman ZN, van Tendeloo VFI, et al. Characterization of Interleukin-15-Transpresenting dendritic cells for clinical use. J Immunol Res. 2017;2017:1975902.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. Carralot J-P, Probst J, Hoerr I, Scheel B, Teufel R, Jung G, Rammensee HG, Pascolo S. Polarization of immunity induced by direct injection of naked sequence-stabilized mRNA vaccines. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2004;61(18):2418–24. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. Kreiter S, Selmi A, Diken M, Koslowski M, Britten CM, Huber C, Türeci Ö, Sahin U. Intranodal vaccination with naked antigen-encoding RNA elicits potent prophylactic and therapeutic Antitumoral immunity. Cancer Res. 2010;70(22):9031–40. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Bialkowski L, van Weijnen A, van der Jeught K, Renmans D, Daszkiewicz L, Heirman C, Stangé G, Breckpot K, Aerts JL, Thielemans K. Intralymphatic mRNA vaccine induces CD8 T-cell responses that inhibit the growth of mucosally located tumours. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):22509. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. van Lint S, Goyvaerts C, Maenhout S, Goethals L, Disy A, Benteyn D, Pen J, Bonehill A, Heirman C, Breckpot K, Thielemans K. Preclinical evaluation of TriMix and antigen mRNA-based antitumor therapy. Cancer Res. 2012;72(7):1661–71. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Sahin U, Derhovanessian E, Miller M, Kloke B-P, Simon P, Löwer M, Bukur V, Tadmor AD, Luxemburger U, Schrörs B, Omokoko T, Vormehr M, Albrecht C, Paruzynski A, Kuhn AN, Buck J, Heesch S, Schreeb KH, Müller F, Ortseifer I, Vogler I, Godehardt E, Attig S, Rae R, Breitkreuz A, Tolliver C, Suchan M, Martic G, Hohberger A, Sorn P, Diekmann J, Ciesla J, Waksmann O, Brück AK, Witt M, Zillgen M, Rothermel A, Kasemann B, Langer D, Bolte S, Diken M, Kreiter S, Nemecek R, Gebhardt C, Grabbe S, Höller C, Utikal J, Huber C, Loquai C, Türeci Ö. Personalized RNA mutanome vaccines mobilize poly-specific therapeutic immunity against cancer. Nature. 2017;547(7662):222–6. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Rittig SM, Haentschel M, Weimer KJ, Heine A, Muller MR, Brugger W, Horger MS, Maksimovic O, Stenzl A, Hoerr I, Rammensee HG, Holderried TAW, Kanz L, Pascolo S, Brossart P. Intradermal vaccinations with RNA coding for TAA generate CD8+ and CD4+ immune responses and induce clinical benefit in vaccinated patients. Mol Ther. 2011;19(5):990–9. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Diken M, Kreiter S, Selmi A, Britten CM, Huber C, Türeci Ö, Sahin U. Selective uptake of naked vaccine RNA by dendritic cells is driven by macropinocytosis and abrogated upon DC maturation. Gene Ther. 2011;18(7):702–8. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Selmi A, Vascotto F, Kautz-Neu K, Türeci Ö, Sahin U, von Stebut E, Diken M, Kreiter S. Uptake of synthetic naked RNA by skin-resident dendritic cells via macropinocytosis allows antigen expression and induction of T-cell responses in mice. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2016;65(9):1075–83. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Weide B, Carralot J-P, Reese A, Scheel B, Eigentler TK, Hoerr I, Rammensee HG, Garbe C, Pascolo S. Results of the first phase I/II clinical vaccination trial with direct injection of mRNA. J Immunother. 2008;31(2):180–8. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Vormehr M, Türeci Ö, Sahin U. Harnessing tumor mutations for truly individualized Cancer vaccines. Annu Rev Med. 2019;70(1):395–407. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Zeng C, Zhang C, Walker PG, Dong Y. Formulation and Delivery Technologies for mRNA Vaccines. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2020.

  96. Kowalczyk A, Doener F, Zanzinger K, Noth J, Baumhof P, Fotin-Mleczek M, et al. Self-adjuvanted mRNA vaccines induce local innate immune responses that lead to a potent and boostable adaptive immunity. Vaccine. 2016;34(33):3882–93.

  97. Papachristofilou A, Hipp MM, Klinkhardt U, Früh M, Sebastian M, Weiss C, Pless M, Cathomas R, Hilbe W, Pall G, Wehler T, Alt J, Bischoff H, Geißler M, Griesinger F, Kallen KJ, Fotin-Mleczek M, Schröder A, Scheel B, Muth A, Seibel T, Stosnach C, Doener F, Hong HS, Koch SD, Gnad-Vogt U, Zippelius A. Phase Ib evaluation of a self-adjuvanted protamine formulated mRNA-based active cancer immunotherapy, BI1361849 (CV9202), combined with local radiation treatment in patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer. J Immunother Cancer. 2019;7(1):38. .

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  98. Sebastian M, Papachristofilou A, Weiss C, Früh M, Cathomas R, Hilbe W, Wehler T, Rippin G, Koch SD, Scheel B, Fotin-Mleczek M, Heidenreich R, Kallen KJ, Gnad-Vogt U, Zippelius A. Phase Ib study evaluating a self-adjuvanted mRNA cancer vaccine (RNActive®) combined with local radiation as consolidation and maintenance treatment for patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer. BMC Cancer. 2014;14(1):748. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  99. Weide B, Pascolo S, Scheel B, Derhovanessian E, Pflugfelder A, Eigentler TK, Pawelec G, Hoerr I, Rammensee HG, Garbe C. Direct injection of protamine-protected mRNA: results of a phase 1/2 vaccination trial in metastatic melanoma patients. J Immunother. 2009;32(5):498–507. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Sebastian M, Schröder A, Scheel B, Hong HS, Muth A, von Boehmer L, Zippelius A, Mayer F, Reck M, Atanackovic D, Thomas M, Schneller F, Stöhlmacher J, Bernhard H, Gröschel A, Lander T, Probst J, Strack T, Wiegand V, Gnad-Vogt U, Kallen KJ, Hoerr I, von der Muelbe F, Fotin-Mleczek M, Knuth A, Koch SD. A phase I/IIa study of the mRNA-based cancer immunotherapy CV9201 in patients with stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2019;68(5):799–812. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Scheibenbogen C, Schadendorf D, Bechrakis NE, Nagorsen D, Hofmann U, Servetopoulou F, Letsch A, Philipp A, Foerster MH, Schmittel A, Thiel E, Keilholz U. Effects of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and foreign helper protein as immunologic adjuvants on the T-cell response to vaccination with tyrosinase peptides. Int J Cancer. 2003;104(2):188–94. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Malone RW, Felgner PL, Verma IM. Cationic liposome-mediated RNA transfection. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1989;86(16):6077–81. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  103. Phua KKL. Towards targeted delivery systems: ligand conjugation strategies for mRNA nanoparticle tumor vaccines. J Immunol Res. 2015;2015:680620.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  104. Perche F, Benvegnu T, Berchel M, Lebegue L, Pichon C, Jaffrès P-A, Midoux P. Enhancement of dendritic cells transfection in vivo and of vaccination against B16F10 melanoma with mannosylated histidylated lipopolyplexes loaded with tumor antigen messenger RNA. Nanomedicine. 2011;7(4):445–53. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Van der Jeught K, De Koker S, Bialkowski L, Heirman C, Tjok JP, Perche F, et al. Dendritic Cell Targeting mRNA Lipopolyplexes Combine Strong Antitumor T-Cell Immunity with Improved Inflammatory Safety. ACS Nano. 2018;12(10):9815–29.

  106. Guan S, Rosenecker J. Nanotechnologies in delivery of mRNA therapeutics using nonviral vector-based delivery systems. Gene Ther. 2017;24(3):133–43. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Kreiter S, Vormehr M, van de Roemer N, Diken M, Löwer M, Diekmann J, Boegel S, Schrörs B, Vascotto F, Castle JC, Tadmor AD, Schoenberger SP, Huber C, Türeci Ö, Sahin U. Mutant MHC class II epitopes drive therapeutic immune responses to cancer. Nature. 2015;520(7549):692–6. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  108. Grunwitz C, Salomon N, Vascotto F, Selmi A, Bukur T, Diken M, Kreiter S, Türeci Ö, Sahin U. HPV16 RNA-LPX vaccine mediates complete regression of aggressively growing HPV-positive mouse tumors and establishes protective T cell memory. OncoImmunology. 2019;8(9):e1629259. .

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  109. Salomon N, Vascotto F, Selmi A, Vormehr M, Quinkhardt J, Bukur T, Schrörs B, Löewer M, Diken M, Türeci Ö, Sahin U, Kreiter S. A liposomal RNA vaccine inducing neoantigen-specific CD4+ T cells augments the antitumor activity of local radiotherapy in mice. OncoImmunology. 2020;9(1):1771925. .

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  110. Reinhard K, Rengstl B, Oehm P, Michel K, Billmeier A, Hayduk N, Klein O, Kuna K, Ouchan Y, Wöll S, Christ E, Weber D, Suchan M, Bukur T, Birtel M, Jahndel V, Mroz K, Hobohm K, Kranz L, Diken M, Kühlcke K, Türeci Ö, Sahin U. An RNA vaccine drives expansion and efficacy of claudin-CAR-T cells against solid tumors. Science. 2020;367(6476):446–53. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Sahin U, Muik A, Derhovanessian E, Vogler I, Kranz LM, Vormehr M, Baum A, Pascal K, Quandt J, Maurus D, Brachtendorf S, Lörks V, Sikorski J, Hilker R, Becker D, Eller AK, Grützner J, Boesler C, Rosenbaum C, Kühnle MC, Luxemburger U, Kemmer-Brück A, Langer D, Bexon M, Bolte S, Karikó K, Palanche T, Fischer B, Schultz A, Shi PY, Fontes-Garfias C, Perez JL, Swanson KA, Loschko J, Scully IL, Cutler M, Kalina W, Kyratsous CA, Cooper D, Dormitzer PR, Jansen KU, Türeci Ö. COVID-19 vaccine BNT162b1 elicits human antibody and TH1 T cell responses. Nature. 2020;586(7830):594–9. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. Sahin U, Muik A, Vogler I, Derhovanessian E, Kranz LM, Vormehr M, et al. BNT162b2 induces SARS-CoV-2-neutralising antibodies and T cells in humans. medRxiv. 2020;12.09.20245175.

  113. Mulligan MJ, Lyke KE, Kitchin N, Absalon J, Gurtman A, Lockhart S, Neuzil K, Raabe V, Bailey R, Swanson KA, Li P, Koury K, Kalina W, Cooper D, Fontes-Garfias C, Shi PY, Türeci Ö, Tompkins KR, Walsh EE, Frenck R, Falsey AR, Dormitzer PR, Gruber WC, Şahin U, Jansen KU. Phase I/II study of COVID-19 RNA vaccine BNT162b1 in adults. Nature. 2020;586(7830):589–93. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. Baden LR, El Sahly HM, Essink B, Kotloff K, Frey S, Novak R, et al. Efficacy and safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(5):403–16.

  115. Vogel AB, Kanevsky I, Che Y, Swanson KA, Muik A, Vormehr M, Kranz LM, Walzer KC, Hein S, Güler A, Loschko J, Maddur MS, Ota-Setlik A, Tompkins K, Cole J, Lui BG, Ziegenhals T, Plaschke A, Eisel D, Dany SC, Fesser S, Erbar S, Bates F, Schneider D, Jesionek B, Sänger B, Wallisch AK, Feuchter Y, Junginger H, Krumm SA, Heinen AP, Adams-Quack P, Schlereth J, Schille S, Kröner C, de la Caridad Güimil Garcia R, Hiller T, Fischer L, Sellers RS, Choudhary S, Gonzalez O, Vascotto F, Gutman MR, Fontenot JA, Hall-Ursone S, Brasky K, Griffor MC, Han S, Su AAH, Lees JA, Nedoma NL, Mashalidis EH, Sahasrabudhe PV, Tan CY, Pavliakova D, Singh G, Fontes-Garfias C, Pride M, Scully IL, Ciolino T, Obregon J, Gazi M, Carrion R Jr, Alfson KJ, Kalina WV, Kaushal D, Shi PY, Klamp T, Rosenbaum C, Kuhn AN, Türeci Ö, Dormitzer PR, Jansen KU, Sahin U. BNT162b vaccines protect rhesus macaques from SARS-CoV-2. Nature. 2021. .

  116. Dagan N, Barda N, Kepten E, Miron O, Perchik S, Katz MA, Hernán MA, Lipsitch M, Reis B, Balicer RD. BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 vaccine in a Nationwide mass vaccination setting. N Engl J Med. 2021. .

  117. Petter E, Mor O, Zuckerman N, Oz-Levi D, Younger A, Aran D et al. Initial real world evidence for lower viral load of individuals who have been vaccinated by BNT162b2: cold Spring Harbor laboratory; 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  118. Bahl K, Senn JJ, Yuzhakov O, Bulychev A, Brito LA, Hassett KJ, Laska ME, Smith M, Almarsson Ö, Thompson J, Ribeiro A(M), Watson M, Zaks T, Ciaramella G. Preclinical and clinical demonstration of immunogenicity by mRNA vaccines against H10N8 and H7N9 influenza viruses. Mol Ther. 2017;25(6):1316–27. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  119. Meyer M, Huang E, Yuzhakov O, Ramanathan P, Ciaramella G, Bukreyev A. Modified mRNA-based vaccines elicit robust immune responses and protect Guinea pigs from Ebola virus disease. J Infect Dis. 2018;217(3):451–5. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  120. Richner JM, Himansu S, Dowd KA, Butler SL, Salazar V, Fox JM, et al. Modified mRNA Vaccines Protect against Zika Virus Infection. Cell. 2017;168(6):1114–1125.e10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  121. Pardi N, Hogan MJ, Naradikian MS, Parkhouse K, Cain DW, Jones L, Moody MA, Verkerke HP, Myles A, Willis E, LaBranche CC, Montefiori DC, Lobby JL, Saunders KO, Liao HX, Korber BT, Sutherland LL, Scearce RM, Hraber PT, Tombácz I, Muramatsu H, Ni H, Balikov DA, Li C, Mui BL, Tam YK, Krammer F, Karikó K, Polacino P, Eisenlohr LC, Madden TD, Hope MJ, Lewis MG, Lee KK, Hu SL, Hensley SE, Cancro MP, Haynes BF, Weissman D. Nucleoside-modified mRNA vaccines induce potent T follicular helper and germinal center B cell responses. J Exp Med. 2018;215(6):1571–88. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  122. Corbett KS, Flynn B, Foulds KE, Francica JR, Boyoglu-Barnum S, Werner AP, Flach B, O’Connell S, Bock KW, Minai M, Nagata BM, Andersen H, Martinez DR, Noe AT, Douek N, Donaldson MM, Nji NN, Alvarado GS, Edwards DK, Flebbe DR, Lamb E, Doria-Rose NA, Lin BC, Louder MK, O’Dell S, Schmidt SD, Phung E, Chang LA, Yap C, Todd JPM, Pessaint L, van Ry A, Browne S, Greenhouse J, Putman-Taylor T, Strasbaugh A, Campbell TA, Cook A, Dodson A, Steingrebe K, Shi W, Zhang Y, Abiona OM, Wang L, Pegu A, Yang ES, Leung K, Zhou T, Teng IT, Widge A, Gordon I, Novik L, Gillespie RA, Loomis RJ, Moliva JI, Stewart-Jones G, Himansu S, Kong WP, Nason MC, Morabito KM, Ruckwardt TJ, Ledgerwood JE, Gaudinski MR, Kwong PD, Mascola JR, Carfi A, Lewis MG, Baric RS, McDermott A, Moore IN, Sullivan NJ, Roederer M, Seder RA, Graham BS. Evaluation of the mRNA-1273 vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 in nonhuman Primates. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(16):1544–55. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  123. Cafri G, Gartner JJ, Zaks T, Hopson K, Levin N, Paria BC, Parkhurst MR, Yossef R, Lowery FJ, Jafferji MS, Prickett TD, Goff SL, McGowan CT, Seitter S, Shindorf ML, Parikh A, Chatani PD, Robbins PF, Rosenberg SA. mRNA vaccine-induced neoantigen-specific T cell immunity in patients with gastrointestinal cancer. J Clin Invest. 2020;130(11):5976–88. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  124. Miao L, Li L, Huang Y, Delcassian D, Chahal J, Han J, Shi Y, Sadtler K, Gao W, Lin J, Doloff JC, Langer R, Anderson DG. Delivery of mRNA vaccines with heterocyclic lipids increases anti-tumor efficacy by STING-mediated immune cell activation. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37(10):1174–85. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  125. Maude SL, Laetsch TW, Buechner J, Rives S, Boyer M, Bittencourt H, Bader P, Verneris MR, Stefanski HE, Myers GD, Qayed M, de Moerloose B, Hiramatsu H, Schlis K, Davis KL, Martin PL, Nemecek ER, Yanik GA, Peters C, Baruchel A, Boissel N, Mechinaud F, Balduzzi A, Krueger J, June CH, Levine BL, Wood P, Taran T, Leung M, Mueller KT, Zhang Y, Sen K, Lebwohl D, Pulsipher MA, Grupp SA. Tisagenlecleucel in children and young adults with B-cell lymphoblastic Leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(5):439–48. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  126. Neelapu SS, Locke FL, Bartlett NL, Lekakis LJ, Miklos DB, Jacobson CA, Braunschweig I, Oluwole OO, Siddiqi T, Lin Y, Timmerman JM, Stiff PJ, Friedberg JW, Flinn IW, Goy A, Hill BT, Smith MR, Deol A, Farooq U, McSweeney P, Munoz J, Avivi I, Castro JE, Westin JR, Chavez JC, Ghobadi A, Komanduri KV, Levy R, Jacobsen ED, Witzig TE, Reagan P, Bot A, Rossi J, Navale L, Jiang Y, Aycock J, Elias M, Chang D, Wiezorek J, Go WY. Axicabtagene Ciloleucel CAR T-cell therapy in refractory large B-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(26):2531–44. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  127. Lee JM, Yoon SH, Kim H-S, Kim SY, Sohn H-J, Oh S-T, Oh IH, Kim TG. Direct and indirect antitumor effects by human peripheral blood lymphocytes expressing both chimeric immune receptor and interleukin-2 in ovarian cancer xenograft model. Cancer Gene Ther. 2010;17(10):742–50. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  128. Carlsten M, Levy E, Karambelkar A, Li L, Reger R, Berg M, et al. Efficient mRNA-based genetic engineering of human NK cells with high-affinity CD16 and CCR7 augments rituximab-induced ADCC against lymphoma and targets NK cell migration toward the lymph node-associated chemokine CCL19. Front Immunol. 2016;7:105.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  129. Ng YY, Tay JCK, Wang S. CXCR1 expression to improve anti-Cancer efficacy of intravenously injected CAR-NK cells in mice with peritoneal Xenografts. Mol Ther Oncolytics. 2020;16:75–85. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  130. Mitchell DA, Karikari I, Cui X, Xie W, Schmittling R, Sampson JH. Selective modification of antigen-specific T cells by RNA electroporation. Hum Gene Ther. 2008;19(5):511–21. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  131. Dörrie J, Schaft N, Müller I, Wellner V, Schunder T, Hänig J, Oostingh GJ, Schön MP, Robert C, Kämpgen E, Schuler G. Introduction of functional chimeric E/L-selectin by RNA electroporation to target dendritic cells from blood to lymph nodes. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2008;57(4):467–77. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  132. Ren J, Liu X, Fang C, Jiang S, June CH, Zhao Y. Multiplex genome editing to generate universal CAR T cells resistant to PD1 inhibition. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23(9):2255–66. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  133. Zhao Y, Zheng Z, Cohen CJ, Gattinoni L, Palmer DC, Restifo NP, et al. High-efficiency transfection of primary human and mouse T lymphocytes using RNA electroporation. Mol Ther. 2006;13(1):151–9.

  134. Yoon SH, Lee JM, Woo SJ, Park MJ, Park JS, Kim HS, et al. Transfer of Her-2/neu specificity into cytokine-induced killer (CIK) cells with RNA encoding chimeric immune receptor (CIR). J Clin Immunol. 2009;29(6):806–14.

  135. Boissel L, Betancur M, Wels WS, Tuncer H, Klingemann H. Transfection with mRNA for CD19 specific chimeric antigen receptor restores NK cell mediated killing of CLL cells. Leuk Res. 2009;33(9):1255–9. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  136. Schaft N, Dörrie J, Müller I, Beck V, Baumann S, Schunder T, et al. A new way to generate cytolytic tumor-specific T cells: Electroporation of RNA coding for a T cell receptor into T lymphocytes. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2006;55(9):1132–41.

  137. Birkholz K, Hombach A, Krug C, Reuter S, Kershaw M, Kämpgen E, Schuler G, Abken H, Schaft N, Dörrie J. Transfer of mRNA encoding recombinant immunoreceptors reprograms CD4+ and CD8+ T cells for use in the adoptive immunotherapy of cancer. Gene Ther. 2009;16(5):596–604. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  138. Almåsbak H, Rian E, Hoel HJ, Pulè M, Wälchli S, Kvalheim G, Gaudernack G, Rasmussen AM. Transiently redirected T cells for adoptive transfer. Cytotherapy. 2011;13(5):629–40. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  139. Barrett DM, Zhao Y, Liu X, Jiang S, Carpenito C, Kalos M, Carroll RG, June CH, Grupp SA. Treatment of advanced leukemia in mice with mRNA engineered T cells. Hum Gene Ther. 2011;22(12):1575–86. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  140. Kenderian SS, Ruella M, Shestova O, Klichinsky M, Aikawa V, Morrissette JJD, Scholler J, Song D, Porter DL, Carroll M, June CH, Gill S. CD33-specific chimeric antigen receptor T cells exhibit potent preclinical activity against human acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia. 2015;29(8):1637–47. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  141. Ang WX, Li Z, Chi Z, Du SH, Chen C, Tay JC, et al. Intraperitoneal immunotherapy with T cells stably and transiently expressing anti-EpCAM CAR in xenograft models of peritoneal carcinomatosis. Oncotarget. 2017;8(8):13545–59.

  142. Rabinovich PM, Komarovskaya ME, Wrzesinski SH, Alderman JL, Budak-Alpdogan T, Karpikov A, Guo H, Flavell RA, Cheung NK, Weissman SM, Bahceci E. Chimeric receptor mRNA transfection as a tool to generate antineoplastic lymphocytes. Hum Gene Ther. 2009;20(1):51–61. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  143. Singh N, Liu X, Hulitt J, Jiang S, June CH, Grupp SA, Barrett DM, Zhao Y. Nature of tumor control by permanently and transiently modified GD2 chimeric antigen receptor T cells in xenograft models of neuroblastoma. Cancer Immunol Res. 2014;2(11):1059–70. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  144. Lehner M, Götz G, Proff J, Schaft N, Dörrie J, Full F, Ensser A, Muller YA, Cerwenka A, Abken H, Parolini O, Ambros PF, Kovar H, Holter W. Redirecting T cells to Ewing's sarcoma family of tumors by a chimeric NKG2D receptor expressed by lentiviral transduction or mRNA transfection. PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e31210. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  145. Krug C, Birkholz K, Paulus A, Schwenkert M, Schmidt P, Hoffmann N, et al. Stability and activity of MCSP-specific chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) depend on the scFv antigen-binding domain and the protein backbone. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2015;64(12):1623–35.

  146. Almåsbak H, Walseng E, Kristian A, Myhre SEM, Munthe L, et al. Inclusion of an IgG1-Fc spacer abrogates efficacy of CD19 CAR T cells in a xenograft mouse model. Gene Ther. 2015;22(5):391–403.

  147. Inoo K, Inagaki R, Fujiwara K, Sasawatari S, Kamigaki T, Nakagawa S, Okada N. Immunological quality and performance of tumor vessel-targeting CAR-T cells prepared by mRNA-EP for clinical research. Mol Ther Oncolytics. 2016;3:16024. .

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  148. Li Z, Chi Z, Ang WX, Chen C, Tay JC, Ng YY, et al. Experimental treatment of colorectal cancer in mice with human T cells electroporated with NKG2D RNA CAR. Immunotherapy. 2020;12(10):733–48.

  149. Schutsky K, Song DG, Lynn R, Smith JB, Poussin M, Figini M, Zhao Y, Powell DJ Jr. Rigorous optimization and validation of potent RNA CAR T cell therapy for the treatment of common epithelial cancers expressing folate receptor. Oncotarget. 2015;6(30):28911–28. .

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  150. Zhao Y, Moon E, Carpenito C, Paulos CM, Liu X, Brennan AL, Chew A, Carroll RG, Scholler J, Levine BL, Albelda SM, June CH. Multiple injections of Electroporated autologous T cells expressing a chimeric antigen receptor mediate regression of human disseminated tumor. Cancer Res. 2010;70(22):9053–61. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  151. Fujiwara K, Sasawatari S, Nakai S, Imaeda K, Nagai S, Matsuno Y, et al. Predicting the Efficacy and Safety of TACTICs (Tumor Angiogenesis-Specific CAR-T Cells Impacting Cancers) Therapy for Soft Tissue Sarcoma Patients. Cancers (Basel). 2020;12(10):2735.

  152. Foster JB, Choudhari N, Perazzelli J, Storm J, Hofmann TJ, Jain P, Storm PB, Pardi N, Weissman D, Waanders AJ, Grupp SA, Karikó K, Resnick AC, Barrett DM. Purification of mRNA encoding chimeric antigen receptor is critical for generation of a robust T-cell response. Hum Gene Ther. 2019;30(2):168–78. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  153. Krug C, Wiesinger M, Abken H, Schuler-Thurner B, Schuler G, Dörrie J, et al. A GMP-compliant protocol to expand and transfect cancer patient T cells with mRNA encoding a tumor-specific chimeric antigen receptor. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2014;63(10):999–1008.

  154. Wiesinger M, März J, Kummer M, Schuler G, Dörrie J, Schuler-Thurner B, et al. Clinical-Scale Production of CAR-T Cells for the Treatment of Melanoma Patients by mRNA Transfection of a CSPG4-Specific CAR under Full GMP Compliance. Cancers (Basel). 2019;11(8):1198.

  155. Rabinovich PM, Komarovskaya ME, Ye Z-J, Imai C, Campana D, Bahceci E, Weissman SM. Synthetic messenger RNA as a tool for gene therapy. Hum Gene Ther. 2006;17(10):1027–35. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  156. Lin L, Cho S-F, Xing L, Wen K, Li Y, Yu T, et al. Preclinical evaluation of CD8+ anti-BCMA mRNA CAR T cells for treatment of multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 2021;35(3):752–763.

  157. Xiao L, Cen D, Gan H, Sun Y, Huang N, Xiong H, et al. Adoptive Transfer of NKG2D CAR mRNA-Engineered Natural Killer Cells in Colorectal Cancer Patients. Mol Ther. 2019;27(6):1114–25.

  158. Maus MV, Haas AR, Beatty GL, Albelda SM, Levine BL, Liu X, Zhao Y, Kalos M, June CH. T cells expressing chimeric antigen receptors can cause anaphylaxis in humans. Cancer Immunol Res. 2013;1(1):26–31. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  159. Beatty GL, Haas AR, Maus MV, Torigian DA, Soulen MC, Plesa G, Chew A, Zhao Y, Levine BL, Albelda SM, Kalos M, June CH. Mesothelin-specific chimeric antigen receptor mRNA-engineered T cells induce anti-tumor activity in solid malignancies. Cancer Immunol Res. 2014;2(2):112–20. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  160. Beatty GL, O'Hara MH, Lacey SF, Torigian DA, Nazimuddin F, Chen F, et al. Activity of Mesothelin-specific chimeric antigen receptor T cells against pancreatic carcinoma metastases in a phase 1 trial. Gastroenterology. 2018;155(1):29–32. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  161. Tchou J, Zhao Y, Levine BL, Zhang PJ, Davis MM, Melenhorst JJ, Kulikovskaya I, Brennan AL, Liu X, Lacey SF, Posey AD Jr, Williams AD, So A, Conejo-Garcia JR, Plesa G, Young RM, McGettigan S, Campbell J, Pierce RH, Matro JM, DeMichele AM, Clark AS, Cooper LJ, Schuchter LM, Vonderheide RH, June CH. Safety and efficacy of Intratumoral injections of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells in metastatic breast Cancer. Cancer Immunol Res. 2017;5(12):1152–61. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  162. Barrett DM, Liu X, Jiang S, June CH, Grupp SA, Zhao Y. Regimen-specific effects of RNA-modified chimeric antigen receptor T cells in mice with advanced leukemia. Hum Gene Ther. 2013;24(8):717–27. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  163. Svoboda J, Rheingold SR, Gill SI, Grupp SA, Lacey SF, Kulikovskaya I, Suhoski MM, Melenhorst JJ, Loudon B, Mato AR, Nasta SD, Landsburg DJ, Youngman MR, Levine BL, Porter DL, June CH, Schuster SJ. Nonviral RNA chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood. 2018;132(10):1022–6. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  164. Cummins KD, Frey N, Nelson AM, Schmidt A, Luger S, Isaacs RE, et al. Treating Relapsed / Refractory (RR) AML with Biodegradable Anti-CD123 CAR Modified T Cells. Blood. 2017;130(Supplement 1):1359.

    Google Scholar 

  165. Chang K, Pastan I, Willingham MC. Isolation and characterization of a monoclonal antibody, K1, reactive with ovarian cancers and normal mesothelium. Int J Cancer. 1992;50(3):373–81. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  166. Gill S, Tasian SK, Ruella M, Shestova O, Li Y, Porter DL, et al. Preclinical targeting of human acute myeloid leukemia and myeloablation using chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells. Blood. 2014;123(15):2343–54.

  167. Tasian SK, Kenderian SS, Shen F, Ruella M, Shestova O, Kozlowski M, Li Y, Schrank-Hacker A, Morrissette JJD, Carroll M, June CH, Grupp SA, Gill S. Optimized depletion of chimeric antigen receptor T cells in murine xenograft models of human acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2017;129(17):2395–407. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  168. Harrer DC, Simon B, Fujii S-I, Shimizu K, Uslu U, Schuler G, Gerer KF, Hoyer S, Dörrie J, Schaft N. RNA-transfection of γ/δ T cells with a chimeric antigen receptor or an α/β T-cell receptor: a safer alternative to genetically engineered α/β T cells for the immunotherapy of melanoma. BMC Cancer. 2017;17(1):551. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  169. Ang WX, Ng YY, Xiao L, Chen C, Li Z, Chi Z, Tay JCK, Tan WK, Zeng J, Toh HC, Wang S. Electroporation of NKG2D RNA CAR improves Vγ9Vδ2 T cell responses against human solid tumor Xenografts. Mol Ther Oncolytics. 2020;17:421–30. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  170. Simon B, Wiesinger M, März J, Wistuba-Hamprecht K, Weide B, Schuler-Thurner B, et al. The Generation of CAR-Transfected Natural Killer T Cells for the Immunotherapy of Melanoma. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(8):2365.

  171. Boissel L, Betancur M, Lu W, Wels WS, Marino T, van Etten RA, Klingemann H. Comparison of mRNA and lentiviral based transfection of natural killer cells with chimeric antigen receptors recognizing lymphoid antigens. Leuk Lymphoma. 2012;53(5):958–65. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  172. Shimasaki N, Fujisaki H, Cho D, Masselli M, Lockey T, Eldridge P, et al. A clinically adaptable method to enhance the cytotoxicity of natural killer cells against B-cell malignancies. Cytotherapy. 2012;14(7):830–40.

  173. Pierpont TM, Limper CB, Richards KL. Past, present, and future of rituximab-the World's first oncology monoclonal antibody therapy. Front Oncol. 2018;8:163. .

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  174. Hudis CA. Trastuzumab--mechanism of action and use in clinical practice. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(1):39–51. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  175. Thran M, Mukherjee J, Pönisch M, Fiedler K, Thess A, Mui BL, Hope MJ, Tam YK, Horscroft N, Heidenreich R, Fotin-Mleczek M, Shoemaker CB, Schlake T. mRNA mediates passive vaccination against infectious agents, toxins, and tumors. EMBO Mol Med. 2017;9(10):1434–47. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  176. Rybakova Y, Kowalski PS, Huang Y, Gonzalez JT, Heartlein MW, DeRosa F, et al. mRNA delivery for therapeutic anti-HER2 antibody expression in vivo. Mol Ther. 2019;27(8):1415–23.

  177. Spiess C, Zhai Q, Carter PJ. Alternative molecular formats and therapeutic applications for bispecific antibodies. Mol Immunol. 2015;67(2 Pt A):95–106.

  178. Stadler CR, Bähr-Mahmud H, Celik L, Hebich B, Roth AS, Roth RP, et al. Elimination of large tumors in mice by mRNA-encoded bispecific antibodies. Nat Med. 2017;23(7):815–7.

  179. Ballesteros-Briones MC, Martisova E, Casales E, Silva-Pilipich N, Buñuales M, Galindo J, Mancheño U, Gorraiz M, Lasarte JJ, Kochan G, Escors D, Sanchez-Paulete AR, Melero I, Prieto J, Hernandez-Alcoceba R, Hervas-Stubbs S, Smerdou C. Short-term local expression of a PD-L1 blocking antibody from a self-replicating RNA vector induces potent antitumor responses. Mol Ther. 2019;27(11):1892–905. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  180. Boczkowski D, Lee J, Pruitt S, Nair S. Dendritic cells engineered to secrete anti-GITR antibodies are effective adjuvants to dendritic cell-based immunotherapy. Cancer Gene Ther. 2009;16(12):900–11. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  181. Pruitt SK, Boczkowski D, de Rosa N, Haley NR, Morse MA, Tyler DS, Dannull J, Nair S. Enhancement of anti-tumor immunity through local modulation of CTLA-4 and GITR by dendritic cells. Eur J Immunol. 2011;41(12):3553–63. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  182. Patel MR, Bauer TM, Jimeno A, Wang D, LoRusso P, Do KT, et al. A phase I study of mRNA-2752, a lipid nanoparticle encapsulating mRNAs encoding human OX40L, IL-23, and IL-36γ, for intratumoral (iTu) injection alone and in combination with durvalumab. JCO. 2020;38(15_suppl):3092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  183. Liu X, Barrett DM, Jiang S, Fang C, Kalos M, Grupp SA, June CH, Zhao Y. Improved anti-leukemia activities of adoptively transferred T cells expressing bispecific T-cell engager in mice. Blood Cancer J. 2016;6(6):e430. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  184. Zhou T, Damsky W, Weizman OE, McGeary MK, Hartmann KP, Rosen CE, et al. IL-18BP is a secreted immune checkpoint and barrier to IL-18 immunotherapy. Nature. 2020;583(7817):609–14.

  185. Wang X, Zhao X, Feng C, Weinstein A, Xia R, Wen W, et al. IL-36γ Transforms the Tumor Microenvironment and Promotes Type 1 Lymphocyte-Mediated Antitumor Immune Responses. Cancer Cell. 2015;28(3):296-306.

  186. Nastala CL, Edington HD, McKinney TG, Tahara H, Nalesnik MA, Brunda MJ, et al. Recombinant IL-12 administration induces tumor regression in association with IFN-gamma production. J Immunol. 1994;153(4):1697–706.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  187. Jiang T, Zhou C, Ren S. Role of IL-2 in cancer immunotherapy. OncoImmunology. 2016;5(6):e1163462. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  188. Kranz LM. Complementary effects of RNA encoded, extended half-life IL2 and IL7 synergize in modulating T cell responses and anti-tumoral efficacy. Abstract P620, SITC 2019.

  189. Vormehr M. Substantial improvement of cancer immunotherapy by an RNA encoded extend-ed half-life Interleukin-2 variant. Abstract P626, SITC 2019.

  190. Ring AM, Lin J-X, Feng D, Mitra S, Rickert M, Bowman GR, Pande VS, Li P, Moraga I, Spolski R, Özkan E, Leonard WJ, Garcia KC. Mechanistic and structural insight into the functional dichotomy between IL-2 and IL-15. Nat Immunol. 2012;13(12):1187–95. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  191. Waldmann TA. The shared and contrasting roles of IL2 and IL15 in the life and death of normal and neoplastic lymphocytes: implications for cancer therapy. Cancer Immunol Res. 2015;3(3):219–27. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  192. Conlon KC, Lugli E, Welles HC, Rosenberg SA, Fojo AT, Morris JC, Fleisher TA, Dubois SP, Perera LP, Stewart DM, Goldman CK, Bryant BR, Decker JM, Chen J, Worthy T'YA, Figg WD Sr, Peer CJ, Sneller MC, Lane HC, Yovandich JL, Creekmore SP, Roederer M, Waldmann TA. Redistribution, hyperproliferation, activation of natural killer cells and CD8 T cells, and cytokine production during first-in-human clinical trial of recombinant human interleukin-15 in patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(1):74–82. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  193. Rowley J, Monie A, Hung C-F, Wu T-C. Expression of IL-15RA or an IL-15/IL-15RA fusion on CD8+ T cells modifies adoptively transferred T-cell function in cis. Eur J Immunol. 2009;39(2):491–506. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  194. Leonard JP, Sherman ML, Fisher GL, Buchanan LJ, Larsen G, Atkins MB, Sosman JA, Dutcher JP, Vogelzang NJ, Ryan JL. Effects of single-dose interleukin-12 exposure on interleukin-12-associated toxicity and interferon-gamma production. Blood. 1997;90(7):2541–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  195. Motzer RJ, Rakhit A, Schwartz LH, Olencki T, Malone TM, Sandstrom K, et al. Phase I trial of subcutaneous recombinant human interleukin-12 in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 1998;4(5):1183–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  196. Etxeberria I, Bolaños E, Quetglas JI, Gros A, Villanueva A, Palomero J, et al. Intratumor adoptive transfer of IL-12 mRNA transiently engineered antitumor CD8 + T cells. Cancer Cell. 2019;36(6):613–29.

  197. Hewitt SL, Bailey D, Zielinski J, Apte A, Musenge F, Karp R, Burke S, Garcon F, Mishra A, Gurumurthy S, Watkins A, Arnold K, Moynihan J, Clancy-Thompson E, Mulgrew K, Adjei G, Deschler K, Potz D, Moody G, Leinster DA, Novick S, Sulikowski M, Bagnall C, Martin P, Lapointe JM, Si H, Morehouse C, Sedic M, Wilkinson RW, Herbst R, Frederick JP, Luheshi N. Intratumoral IL12 mRNA therapy promotes TH1 transformation of the tumor microenvironment. Clin Cancer Res. 2020;26(23):6284–98. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  198. Lai I, Swaminathan S, Baylot V, Mosley A, Dhanasekaran R, Gabay M, et al. Lipid nanoparticles that deliver IL-12 messenger RNA suppress tumorigenesis in MYC oncogene-driven hepatocellular carcinoma. J Immunother Cancer. 2018;6(1):125.

  199. Hewitt SL, Bai A, Bailey D, Ichikawa K, Zielinski J, Karp R, et al. Durable anticancer immunity from intratumoral administration of IL-23, IL-36γ, and OX40L mRNAs. Sci Transl Med. 2019;11(477):eaat9143.

  200. Malkova NV, Tolstykh T, Levit M, Theilhaber J, Hebert A, Atchison K, et al. Abstract 4451: Combination of local mRNA immunotherapy with systemic immune checkpoint blockade demonstrates anti-tumor activity across a diverse range of preclinical syngeneic tumor models. In: American Association for Cancer Research; 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  201. van der Jeught K, Joe PT, Bialkowski L, Heirman C, Daszkiewicz L, Liechtenstein T, Escors D, Thielemans K, Breckpot K. Intratumoral administration of mRNA encoding a fusokine consisting of IFN-β and the ectodomain of the TGF-β receptor II potentiates antitumor immunity. Oncotarget. 2014;5(20):10100–13. .

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  202. Pato A, Eisenberg G, Machlenkin A, Margalit A, Cafri G, Frankenburg S, Merims S, Peretz T, Lotem M, Gross G. Messenger RNA encoding constitutively active toll-like receptor 4 enhances effector functions of human T cells. Clin Exp Immunol. 2015;182(2):220–9. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  203. Levin N, Weinstein-Marom H, Pato A, Itzhaki O, Besser MJ, Eisenberg G, Peretz T, Lotem M, Gross G. Potent activation of human T cells by mRNA encoding constitutively active CD40. J Immunol. 2018;201(10):2959–68. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  204. Weinstein-Marom H, Pato A, Levin N, Susid K, Itzhaki O, Besser MJ, et al. Membrane-attached cytokines expressed by mRNA electroporation act as potent T-Cell adjuvants. J Immunother. 2016;39(2):60–70.

  205. Weinstein-Marom H, Levin N, Pato A, Shmuel N, Sharabi-Nov A, Peretz T, et al. Combined expression of genetic adjuvants via mRNA electroporation exerts multiple immunostimulatory effects on antitumor T cells. J Immunother. 2019;42(2):43–50.

  206. van Lint S, Renmans D, Broos K, Goethals L, Maenhout S, Benteyn D, Goyvaerts C, du Four S, van der Jeught K, Bialkowski L, Flamand V, Heirman C, Thielemans K, Breckpot K. Intratumoral delivery of TriMix mRNA results in T-cell activation by cross-presenting dendritic cells. Cancer Immunol Res. 2016;4(2):146–56. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  207. Jimeno A. A phase 1/2, open-label, multicenter, dose escalation and efficacy study of mRNA-2416, a lipid nanoparticle encapsulated mRNA encoding human OX40L, for intratumoral injection alone or in combination with durvalumab for patients with advanced malignancies. Abstract CT032, AACR Annual Meeting 2020.

  208. Haabeth OAW, Blake TR, McKinlay CJ, Tveita AA, Sallets A, Waymouth RM, et al. Local delivery of Ox40l, Cd80, and Cd86 mRNA kindles global anticancer immunity. Cancer Res. 2019;79(7):1624–34. .

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank Andrew Finlayson (BioNTech SE) for thorough proof-reading and helpful discussions.


Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



JDB, DR, NS, MV and LMK designed, and JDB, DR and NS wrote the manuscript. US, ÖT, MV and LMK reviewed, edited and approved the final version of the manuscript. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lena M. Kranz.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

NS, US, ÖT, MV and LMK are authors of studies mentioned in this review. JDB, MV and LMK are employees and US and ÖT are cofounders and management board members of BioNTech SE (Mainz, Germany). JDB, US, ÖT, MV and LMK hold securities from BioNTech SE. All other authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Beck, J.D., Reidenbach, D., Salomon, N. et al. mRNA therapeutics in cancer immunotherapy. Mol Cancer 20, 69 (2021).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: