- Open Access
Survivin safeguards chromosome numbers and protects from aneuploidy independently from p53
© Wiedemuth et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
- Received: 6 December 2013
- Accepted: 2 May 2014
- Published: 9 May 2014
Survivin, a member of the inhibitor of apoptosis (IAP) gene family, has a dual role in mitosis and in apoptosis. It is abundantly expressed in every human tumor, compared with normal tissues. During mitosis Survivin assembles with the chromosomal passenger complex and regulates chromosomal segregation. Here, we aim to explore whether interference with the mitotic function of Survivin is linked to p53-mediated G1 cell cycle arrest and affects chromosomal stability.
In this study, we used HCT116, SBC-2, and U87-MG and generated corresponding isogenic p53-deficient cells. Retroviral vectors were used to stably knockdown Survivin. The resulting phenotype, in particular the mechanisms of cell cycle arrest and of initiation of aneuploidy, were investigated by Western Blot analysis, confocal laser scan microscopy, proliferation assays, spectral karyotyping and RNAi.
In all cell lines Survivin-RNAi did not induce instant apoptosis but caused polyplodization irrespective of p53 status. Strikingly, polyploidization after knockdown of Survivin resulted in merotelic kinetochore spindle assemblies, γH2AX-foci, and DNA damage response (DDR), which was accompanied by a transient p53-mediated G1-arrest. That p53 wild type cells specifically arrest due to DNA damage was shown by simultaneous inhibition of ATM and DNA-PK, which abolished induction of p21waf/cip. Cytogenetic analysis revealed chromosomal aberrations indicative for DNA double strand break repair by the mechanism of non-homologous end joining (NHEJ), only in Survivin-depleted cells.
Our findings suggest that Survivin plays an essential role in proper amphitelic kinetochore-spindle assembly and that constraining Survivin’s mitotic function results in polyploidy and aneuploidy which cannot be controlled by p53. Therefore, Survivin critically safeguards chromosomal stability independently from p53.
Among the family of inhibitor of apoptosis proteins (IAPs), Survivin has received vast attention because it is highly expressed in cancer tissues and cancer cell lines [1, 2]. The gene for Survivin, birc5, is located in 17q25, and gives rise to a dominant expressed isoform with a molecular weight of 16.5 kDa . Compared to other IAPs involved in apoptosis inhibition, Survivin is devoid of C-terminal RING finger and contains only one baculoviral IAP repeat (BIR) domain [1, 3]. First attempts to elucidate the molecular function of Survivin demonstrated an anti-apoptotic function mediated by its BIR domain [4–7]. Although Survivin originally has been described to inhibit apoptosis by blocking activated caspases [7, 8] and smac/Diablo , it is now unanimously recognized that the main molecular function of Survivin is linked to the control of the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) and cytokinesis . The mitotic localization of Survivin is consistent with proteins described as chromosomal passenger proteins (CPP) [11–13]. During early mitosis, Survivin associates around centromeres together with its CPP partners Aurora B, Borealin and inner centromere protein (INCENP) to build a chromosomal passenger complex (CPC) [12, 14]. At this location the CPC is responsible for sensing and correcting non-bipolar microtubule-kinetochore interaction [15–17]. It is hypothesized that the CPC can resolve the problem of syntelic- or merotelic-attached chromosomes by freeing the microtubule-kinetochore assembly, which eventually leads to the activation of the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) and therefore prevents premature onset of anaphase [18–20]. When anaphase starts Survivin leaves the kinetochores but in telophase re-aggregates with its CPC partners at the polar end of microtubules demarcating the cleavage furrow [21, 22]. At this location, the Aurora B kinase within the CPC phosphorylates proteins regulating the contractile actin-myosin ring such as MGCRacGAP .
Cells with impaired function of Survivin or of one of its CPP partners due to RNAi-mediated inhibition or expression of dominant-negative mutants showed comparable phenotypes (i.e., disturbed segregation of chromosomes and defective cytokinesis) [5, 21, 24–26].
Many reports focused on the role of Survivin’s IAP function in the control of p53-governed cell cycle checkpoints and induction of apoptosis. Early studies using HCT116 cells and HCT116p21−/− cells revealed that interfering mitosis with a SurvivinC84A mutant led to polyploidy and increased cell death in both cell lines . However, the isogenic cells with knockout of the cell cycle regulator p21waf/cip showed an even greater fraction of polyploid cells containing more nuclei per cell. From the observation that p21waf/cip colocalized with Survivin and activated caspase 3 in centrioles of HCT116 wild type cells transfected with a Survivin C84A mutant, and experiments showing p21waf/cip cleavage after Survivin antisense-treatment, it was inferred that this CDK inhibitor might be regulated by the IAP-function of Survivin. In addition, the inactivation of Survivin by antisense or dominant-negative SurvivinT34A resulted in increased mdm2 cleavage in MCF-7 cells leading to accumulation of p53 and cell death . Another study observed an increase in p21waf/cip protein levels after interference with Survivin function which was accompanied by activation of p53 . Additionally, Survivin knockout in mouse thymocytes triggered a p53-mediated growth arrest but resulted in a p53-independent cell death .
So far it has been shown by various methods that the loss of Survivin function severely affects cell division. Yet, it has remained largely unclear why loss of Survivin in some cell lines leads to activation of p53, subsequent p21waf/cip mediated cell cycle arrest and eventually causes cell death.
In this study, we decipher the direct effects but also a subordinate phenotype after Survivin RNAi in three different cell lines and their p53-deficient isogenic counterparts. Our results support published conclusions about Survivin’s function as a chromosomal passenger protein and uncovers the induction of an ATM and DNA-PKCS mediated DNA damage response (DDR) after knockdown of Survivin in p53-deficient cells and wild type cells. Interestingly, cells with knockdown of Survivin developed polyploidy accompanied by the appearance of merotelic kinetochore-microtubuli assemblies in mitosis eventually resulting in DNA double strand breaks. Yet, cells managed to repair damaged chromosomes by non-homologous end joining recombination (NHEJ) resulting in aberrant chromosomes.
The appearance of merotelic kinetochore-microtubuli assemblies, chromosomal breaks and, the induction of DDR as well as the activation of p53 and induction of p21waf/cip in cells with knockdown of Survivin displaying high grade polyploidy conclusively proves that an induction of a p53-dependent G1-arrest is a consequence of heavily disturbed mitosis. In conclusion, our results highlight the important role of Survivin as a chromosomal passenger protein which in concert with its molecular partners Aurora B, INCENP and Borealin, protects cells independently from p53 function from polyploidy and chromosomal instability.
Knockdown of Survivin leads to a p53-independent development of polyploid cells
The gradual increase in polyploidy in tumor cells with knockdown of Survivin is accompanied by activation of p53 and increased p21waf/cip expression levels
Since it was of special interest whether stable loss of Survivin protein is compatible with life we performed clonogenic survival assays. Notably, all cell lines with stable knockdown of Survivin showed after a cultivation period of 3 weeks a dramatic decrease in clonogenic survival irrespective of p53 status when compared to shLuc-transduced cell lines (see Additional file 2a). Interestingly, after knockdown of Survivin no activation of effector caspase 3 was observed in p53-positive HCT116 and U87-MG as well as in p53-negative HCT116shp53 and U87-MGshp53 cells, respectively (see Additional file 2b, c).
However, when we assessed gross fragmentation of DNA it became obvious, that cell populations with knockdown of Survivin contained increased fractions of cells with hypodiploid DNA content when compared to shLuc controls (see Additional file 2d). Yet further AnnexinV/propidium iodide stainings at time points 24 h, 48 h after RNAi showed no significant difference in the fraction of apoptotic cells irrespective of p53 status when shSurv cells were compared to shLuc-transduced controls. Only at 72 h after Survivin-RNAi we observed an increase in the fraction of dead cells and a negligible increase in the fraction of apoptotic cells when compared to the shLuc controls which again was independent from p53 status (see Additional file 2e, f). In conclusion in our experimental setting knockdown of Survivin did not result in an apoptotic phenotype.
The knockdown of Survivin in HCT116p53−/−-cells revealed, as expected, no signs of p53 expression or induction of p21waf/cip, but an increase in the grade of polyploidy over time. Furthermore, it only weakly increased Cyclin D1 expression and did not alter the expression levels of Cyclin E when compared to the shLuc-transduced controls. In HCT116 wild type cells the knockdown of Survivin clearly demonstrated a time-dependent increase in the accumulation of p53 protein as well as a gradual increase in expression levels of p21waf/cip (Figure 2b). Furthermore, progressively increased Cyclin D and E protein levels indicate a G1 arrest. In conclusion these results show a time-dependent increase of markers of G1 cell cycle arrest in p53-positive cells after knockdown of Survivin which was paradoxically accompanied by an ongoing endoreplication of the genome leading to the development of HCT116 cells bearing genomic DNA contents in the range of 4n to 32n (Figure 2c). Yet, the question arises why p53-positive cells with knockdown of Survivin display molecular signs of a G1 cell cycle arrest, but are still capable of replicating their genomes.
Polyploidy in p53-positive cells correlates with p21waf/cip-mediated cell cycle arrest and attenuates S-phase entry
When analyzing total cell populations after Survivin-RNAi it became apparent that the p53-positive cells contain significant increased fractions of p21waf/cip (Figure 3c) and Cyclin D1-positive cells (Figure 3f) when compared to p53-positive cells transduced with shLuc control vector (each p < 0.01) and p53−/−-cells after knockdown of Survivin, respectively (each p < 0.01). Interestingly, after knockdown of Survivin in p53−/−-cells we observed a considerable smaller and significant increase in the fraction of Cyclin D1 positive cells in the whole cell population when compared to p53−/−-shLuc controls (p < 0.01), yet without increase in p21waf/cip expression suggesting a slight p53-independent effect on cell cycle progression (Figure 3f).
On the other hand, the BrdU-incorporation analysis revealed that substantial fractions of p53 wild type cells as well as p53−/−-cells with knockdown of Survivin were still able to enter S-phases of cells with DNA contents of 4n and higher (Figure 3g, h). In contrast to Cyclin D1 and p21waf/cip-expression levels we found a significant decrease in BrdU-incorporation levels in p53-positive cells when compared to HCT116p53−/− (p < 0.05), which was inversely correlated to increase in polyploidy (Figure 3g).
When we compared the BrdU incorporation levels of the total cell populations we revealed a significant decrease in the BrdU-positive cell fraction of p53-positive cells with knockdown of Survivin compared to shLuc controls (p < 0.05) and even to p53−/−-cells with knockdown of Survivin (p < 0.05) (Figure 3i).
In conclusion, these results demonstrate an association of Survivin-RNAi-induced polyploidy with p53 activation and induction of p21waf/cip. However, p53 activation and induction of p21waf/cip after knockdown of Survivin did not hinder entry into S-phase, which indicates a transient cell cycle arrest. Yet, the molecular cause of this observed transient cell cycle arrest remains obscure.
Survivin-RNAi leads to an increase in merotelic spindle attachments, DNA breaks, induction of a DNA damage response, and chromosomal instability
In line with these results additional FACS-assisted analysis of γH2AX expression confirmed increased γH2AX expression preferentially in polyploid HCT116p53−/− and corresponding isogenic p53-positive cells after knockdown of Survivin whereas transduction of the shLuc control had no effect on the levels of γH2AX-positive cells (Figure 5d). DNA damage gradually increased together with the DNA content of cells with knockdown of Survivin (Figure 5e).
Survivin-RNAi induced DNA damage response is mediated through combined action of ATM and DNA-PK sensor kinases
Remarkably, the inactivation of ATM in HCT116 cells (HCT116shATM) resulted after knockdown of Survivin in a strong decreased CHK2 phosphorylation at Thr68 and slightly decreased levels of γH2AX. On the other hand, it did not inhibit the activation of p53 and the subsequent induction of p21waf/cip expression, respectively. Since our cytogenetic analysis revealed chromosomal translocations, we also investigated the role of DNA PKCS DNA-sensor kinase, which plays a pivotal role in DNA repair by the mechanism of non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). Interestingly, we detected activated DNA-PKCS colocalized with ATM S1981 positive foci in nuclei of cells following RNAi of Survivin (Figure 8b). In line with this Western blot analysis of p53 phosphorylation sites in shSurv-treated HCT116 cells revealed enhanced phosphorylation of p53 at S15, S20 and at position S37 indicative of activated ATM, CHK2 and DNA-PKcs kinases [36, 37] (Figure 8c). We therefore concluded that the DNA damage response in HCT116shATM following Survivin-RNAi is also sensed and initiated by DNA-PK (see proposed sensor kinase signaling in Figure 8d). To conclusively prove that loss of Survivin CPP function (in controlling cytokinesis and SAC) is responsible for a transient cell cycle arrest we simultaneously blocked ATM (by stable RNAi) and DNA-PKCS (using the specific inhibitor Nu7026) upstream of p53 and p21waf/cip. As depicted in Figure 8e only the combined inhibitions of both DNA damage sensor kinases led to a decrease in phosphorylation of p53 and subsequently to significantly decreased p21waf/cip protein levels. In particular, simultaneous inhibition of DNA-PKcs and ATM lead to a weaker decrease in S15 phosphorylation but strongly abrogated p53 phosphorylation at S20 and S37 and reduced protein levels of γH2AX. These results corroborate the involvement of DNA-PKCS and ATM in the induction of the p53/p21waf/cip mediated transient cell cycle arrest, DSB repair and NHJE in cells with knock down of Survivin.
The RNAi-phenotype of Survivin confirms its role as chromosomal passenger protein and uncovers its essential role in DNA integrity
Precise chromosome segregation during mitosis requires the attachment of chromosomes to microtubules emanating from both poles of the spindle apparatus. Non-attachment of spindles to kinetochores is sensed by mitotic SAC proteins including CENP-E, Bub1, BubR1, Bub3, Mad1, Mad2 and Mps1. Although not all interactions of SAC proteins are fully understood, it is generally accepted that Mad2 represents the effector protein in charge that becomes activated at kinetochores. Mad2 inhibits the anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) by direct binding to Securin and Cyclin B, whose degradation is required for onset of anaphase [38, 39]. Yet, during the stochastic attachment process of spindle-kinetochore binding, all but bipolar attachments need to be resolved to allow new rounds of attachments. Bipolarity of spindle kinetochore attachment is subjected to pulling forces of the mitotic spindle which is opposed by cohesion between the sister chromatids. Today it is generally suggested, that the CPC, especially its kinase Aurora B, cuts off microtubule binding due to lack of tension on the kinetochores [17, 20]. This in turn leads to free kinetochores which activate the mitotic SAC  and allows a new round of kinetochore microtubuli attachments.
Our study confirmed that Survivin is essentially needed for cytokinesis but also for proper regulation of bipolar spindle attachment. Noteworthy, Survivin is not controlling cell cycle arrest as revealed by our spatial and temporal analysis of the developing Survivin-RNAi phenotype. We conclusively corroborate that the induction of a transient G1 arrest is a consequence of heavily disturbed mitosis, which is solely linked to Survivin’s role as CPP as discussed in detail below. Furthermore, cell death after knockdown of Survivin was not accompanied with increased levels of activated Caspase 3 or increase in the fraction of annexin V-positive cells but was linked to the gradual increase in polyploidy. This observation is consistent with other reports describing a mitotic catastrophe after interference with the function of Survivin challenging its proposed role as IAP during mitosis [41–43].
Our investigations reveal that the primary effect of the knockdown of Survivin, i.e. polyploidy and defective chromosomal segregation, develops independently from p53 and leads to DNA double strand breaks followed by DDR and enhanced chromosomal instability (Figure 8d). We conclude that the loss of Survivin at kinetochores in conjunction with multipolar spindles dramatically increases the likelihood of merotelic spindle kinetochore assemblies which cannot be resolved and finally leads to disrupted chromosomes. Yet, the DDR resulted in a transient p53/p21waf/cip –mediated cell cycle arrest in G1 and cells managed to repair DSBs through NHEJ recombination. In line with this, the inhibition of another chromosomal passenger protein, Aurora-B, recapitulated the Survivin RNAi phenotypes (Wiedemuth et al., manuscript in preparation).
The fact that the transient p53/p21waf/cip-dependent cell cycle arrest was exclusively due to induction of a DNA damage response and not connected to the loss of IAP function of Survivin was proven by simultaneous inhibition of sensor kinases DNA-PK and ATM, which abolished activation of p53 and induction of p21waf/cip.
Our results have profound implications concerning a possible postmitotic G1 cell cycle arrest of tetraploid cells. Recent reports suggested a p53 dependent G1 checkpoint preventing tetraploid cells to enter S phase . Until now, it has remained entirely unknown by which mechanism cells respond to tetraploidy in a p53-dependent manner. In particular, the results from our BrdU-incorporation assays suggest that tetraploidy occurring in cells with defective CPC but functional p53 does not prevent progression into the next S-phase. Although a significant fraction of cells suffer DSBs caused by poly-merotelic kinetochore assemblies, they managed to repair DSBs during a transient p53/p21waf/cip-mediated arrest and progressed in their cell cycle. If the same transient or eventually a stable cell cycle arrest occurs in tetraploid cells having an intact CPC or in cells with defects in the SAC remains to be investigated.
The potential role of Survivin in radioresistance and tumor progression
Survivin has also been implicated in radiation resistance of tumor cells. After radiation Survivin accumulates in interphase nuclei of glioblastoma and colorectal carcinoma cells [45–47]. So far, the underlying mechanisms how Survivin protects cells from radiation is still not fully understood. It has been shown that interfering Survivin’s function by adenoviral overexpression of a dominant-negative mutant of Survivin (SurvivinT34A) leads to decreased DNA damage repair capacity in primary glioblastoma cells as detected by a DNA comet assay . Furthermore, siRNA of Survivin leads to a decreased activity of DNA-PKCS in LN229 glioma cells after radiation and to a concomitant increase in residual γH2AX foci per nucleus . Strikingly, the same group mentioned in their supplementary data increased levels of phospho-ATM in non-irradiated SW480 colorectal carcinoma cells after Survivin-RNAi, which is in line with our results . However, how the knockdown of Survivin affects repair of DSB after radiation still remains elusive since our SKY analysis shows that DNA repair, in particular NHEJ, does not require Survivin and does not even depend on p53.
So far the IAP function of Survivin in conjunction with increased expression levels in tumors has also been implicated to confer resistance to cellular stress and chemotherapy by inhibiting caspases , smac/DIABLO  and apoptosis inducing factor (AIF) . In particular, ectopic overexpression of Survivin in the skin of transgenic mice has been described to confer resistance to UV-mediated apoptosis but also resulted in enhanced progression of skin tumors [50, 51]. Various scientific articles emphasized a possible role of the IAP function of Survivin in tumor progression [52, 53]. Yet, some studies demonstrated that overexpression of Survivin also results in a higher frequency of polyploid bone marrow and glioma cells [24, 54]. Furthermore, a low frequency of polyploid cells was detected in normal human lung fibroblasts and CD34-positive hematopoetic stem cells with ectopic overexpression of Survivin . Up to now, it is well known that the deregulated expressions or the altered stoichiometry of mitotic regulators, in particular Survivin’s partner Aurora B, increase the risk for carcinogenesis by induction of polyploidy and subsequent aneuploidy [55, 56]. As a result of our study and in conjunction with recent reports describing that the overexpression of Survivin favors the progression from chemically induced papilloma to squamous cell carcinoma in K14-Survivin transgenic mice  and initiates hematological malignancies in GATA1-Sur transgenic mice after a single intraperitoneal injection of tumor promoting N-ethyl-nitrosourea , it appears also conceivable that besides Survivin’s IAP function deregulations in the mitotic function of Survivin favor the development of aneuploid cells. In the future it might be therefore worthwhile to investigate the impact of deregulated Survivin protein expression levels on genetic stability and carcinogenesis.
In summary, we have investigated in depth the role of Survivin in control of chromosome segregation and chromosomal stability. Our data indicate that a transient p21waf/cip –mediated cell cycle arrest after knockdown of Survivin is not connected to a proposed IAP function in mitosis, but instead represents a DDR phenotype linked to its role as CPP. Paradoxically our results indicate that p53 expression does not prevent aneuploidy when interfering with Survivin’s CPP function. Therefore, Survivin and its molecular partners in the CPC fundamentally control genetic stability of cells.
Cell culture and clonogenic survival
The hypodiploid colorectal carcinoma-derived HCT116 cells (kindly provided by B. Vogelstein, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore) were cultured in RPMI medium (Life Technologies) supplemented with 10% FCS, 2 mM L-glutamine, 10 mM Hepes, 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 μg/ml streptomycin, whereas the near triploid cervix carcinoma cell line SBC-2 and the human embryonic kidney cells 293 T were maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium containing 4.5 g/l glucose (Life Technologies) supplemented with 10% FCS, 10 mM HEPES, 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 μg/ml streptomycin. The diploid glioblastoma- derived U87-MG cell line and cultivation has been described before . All cell lines were authenticated (Multiplexion GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany) and cultured at 37°C with 5% CO2. Clonogenic survival of transduced U87-MG, HCT116, SBC-2 cells and p53-deficient counterparts was tested by plating duplicates of 1000 cells/dish for every vector transduction onto 10 cm dishes. After 3 weeks, cells were stained with Giemsa and the number of clones was quantified. At least two independent experiments with similar results were performed for each cell line. For DNA-PKcs inhibition cells were cultured, transduced and selected as described. 6 hours before cell lysis media containing 10 μM Nu7026 (Selleckchem) or DMSO were added to the cells.
Retroviral shRNA vectors and transduction
For knockdown of target RNAs we used self-inactivating retroviral Moloney murine leukemia virus (MoMuLV) backbones pRVH-1-puro and pRVH-1-Hygro, both containing a H1 polymerase III promoter for the expression of shRNA molecules. All DNA oligonucleotides encoding shRNAs were synthesized with appropriate BamH I and Sal I restriction sites (Eurofins MWG Biotech) to allow ligation into pRVH-1 vectors. For knockdown of Survivin we used the recently described small hairpin RNA shSurvivin#433  ligated into pRVH-1-puro. For the generation of U87-MGshp53, SBC-2shp53 and HCT116shATM cells we used the shRNAs shp53 (upper strand: 5′-gatccccgactccagtggtaatctacttcaagagagtagattaccactggagtctttttggc − 3′, bottom strand: 5′-tcgagccaaaaagactccagtggtaatctactctcttgaagtagattaccactggagtcggg − 3′ ) and shATM (upper strand: 5′-gatccccgataccagatccttggagattcaagagatctccaaggatctggtatctttttggc − 3′, bottom strand: 5′-tcgagccaaaaagataccagatccttggagatctcttgaatctccaaggatctggtatcggg − 3′ ) ligated in pRVH1-Hygro. As negative control, a previously described RNA targeting sequence for luciferase mRNA (shLuc) was included during all experiments . Transduction of retroviral shRNA vectors was performed as described previously . For the generation of stable p53- (shp53) or ATM- (shATM) deficient cells, transduced cells were selected and cultured using 300 μg/ml Hygromycin B (Life Technologies).
Indirect immunofluorescence analysis
Cells grown on glass slides were fixed for 20 min with 4% PFA. Then they were washed three times for 5 min in HBSS and stained with WGA-Texas Red (wheat germ agglutinin; Life Technologies) in HBSS (10 μg/ml) for 10 min followed by a permeabilization step with 5% BSA, 0.3% Triton-X-100 in PBS for 30 min. Cells were incubated with a primary antibody solution (5% BSA in PBS) for 2 h including monoclonal mouse anti-α-Tubulin (Sigma), monoclonal rabbit anti-p21waf/cip (Cell Signaling), monoclonal rabbit anti-CHK2 T68 (Cell Signaling), monoclonal rabbit anti-ATM S1981 (Epitomics), monoclonal mouse anti-γH2AX (Millipore) and monoclonal mouse anti-DNA-PKCS T2609 (Abcam), respectively. After three 5-min-washes with PBS, cells were subsequently incubated with a secondary antibody solution (sheep/goat anti-mouse Cy3-conjugated antibody, Dianova; sheep/goat anti-rabbit FITC-conjugated antibody, Dianova) for 1 hour followed by extensive wash cycles in HBSS. DNA counterstaining was accomplished using HBSS-Hoechst 33342 (0.1 μg/ml, Life Technologies) solution. Finally, cells were washed twice in HBSS and once in double distilled water, prior the examination by confocal laser scanning microscopy. Colocalization analyses (Coloc) were performed using Fiji’s “Colocalization” algorithm. The p21waf/cip and ɣH2AX statistics were calculated after analyzing the average percentage of fluorescence-labeled cells in at least 3 random fields of shLuc-transduced cells and 6–17 random fields of shSurv-transduced cells, representing at least 570 cells per group. Statistical analysis was performed using Student’s t-test.
Detection of merotelic kinetochore-microtubuli assemblies
Cells were rinsed with HBSS and stained with WGA-Texas Red in HBSS (10 μg/ml) for 10 min at 37°C followed by an incubation with Ca2+ buffer (100 mM PIPES pH 6.8; 1 mM MgCl2; 1 mM CaCl2; 0.5% Triton-X-100) for 7 min at 37°C and fixation with 4% PFA in PBS for 20 min at room temperature. After three 5-min-washes in PHEM buffer pH 6.9 (60 mM PIPES; 25 mM HEPES; 10 mM EGTA; 2 mM MgCl2), cells were permeabilized (5% BSA in PHEM; 0.3% Triton-X-100) for 30 min at room temperature, subsequently washed three times for 5 min in PHEM buffer and were then incubated at room temperature with the primary antibodies in blocking solution (5% BSA in PHEM buffer). Antibodies include mouse anti-α-Tubulin (1:1000; 1.5 h; Sigma) and human anti-centromeric antibody (ACA, 1:500, kindly provided by K. Conrad, TU Dresden, Germany). The primary antibodies were detected after three 5 min washes (PHEM buffer) with polyclonal sheep anti-mouse-Cy3 (1:100; 1 h; Dianova) and anti-human-FITC (undiluted; 30 min; AKLIDES ANA plus; Medipan) successively in blocking solution at room temperature in the dark. After three 5-min-washes in HBSS, DNA was counterstained with Hoechst 33342 (0.1 μg/ml).
Stained cells were imaged with a Leica SP5 inverse microscope (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany). Confocal images were collected at 405, 488, 543 and 594 nm with 63x NA1.4 or 40x NA1.25 objective lenses. Image acquisition, shutter, Z-axis position, laser lines, and confocal system were all controlled by Leica LAS AF software. Series in z-directions (Z-stacks) of single cells were obtained at 0.3 μm steps. Equivalent exposure conditions and scaling was used between controls and RNAi-depleted cells. Images were analyzed using Fiji software  (http://fiji.sc/Fiji). For analysis of merotelic attachments, the acquired images were processed in Fiji including background subtraction, contrast enhancement, smoothing and 3D reconstruction. A kinetochore was scored as being merotelic when it clearly connected two or more visible spindle fibers emanating from different poles in a z-stack or reconstructed 3D image.
Western blot analysis
Cells were harvested and lysed in lysis buffer (10 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.0; 140 mM NaCl; 1% Triton-X-100). Equal amounts of proteins were loaded onto SDS polyacrylamide gels, separated by gel electrophoresis and blotted onto PVDF membranes. Subsequently, membranes were washed 3 times for 10 min in TBS plus 2% Triton X-100 and 0.5% Tween 20 (TBS-TT) and blocked with 5% milk powder or BSA. The membranes were probed with primary antibodies in blocking solution over night at 4°C including rabbit polyclonal anti-Survivin (R&D Systems), polyclonal mouse anti-p21waf/cip (R&D Systems), monoclonal rabbit anti-p21waf/cip (Cell Signaling), polyclonal goat anti-p53 (R&D Systems), monoclonal rabbit anti-p53 S15 (Abcam), polyclonal anti-p53 S20, polyclonal anti-p53 S37 (Cell Signaling), monoclonal mouse anti-α-Tubulin and monoclonal anti-Actin (Sigma), monoclonal rabbit anti-ATM S1981 (Epitomics), polyclonal rabbit anti-ATM (Merck), monoclonal rabbit anti-Caspase 3 (Cell Signaling), monoclonal rabbit anti-CHK2 T68 (Cell Signaling), polyclonal rabbit anti-Cyclin D1 (Santa Cruz), polyclonal rabbit anti-Cyclin E (Santa Cruz) and monoclonal mouse anti-γH2AX (Millipore). After incubation with the primary antibodies, the membranes were washed three times with TBS-TT and incubated for 1 hour at room temperature with appropriate secondary antibodies conjugated with HRP (Dako). The membranes were washed again and signal detection was carried out by chemiluminescence (Luminata Forte, Millipore) using a LAS3000 device. Western blots were quantified with Fiji’s “Gel Analyzer Tool” and densitometric values were normalized to Tubulin.
Cell cycle and apoptosis was determined in a flow cytometer using PI-stained cells as described previously . Analysis of raw data was performed using FlowJo software (Tristar, Inc.). For combined DNA-antibody staining 2 x 105 cells/sample were permeabilized and blocked using 5% BSA in PBS plus 0.3% Triton X-100 for 30 min at room temperature. After centrifugation (1500 rpm, 4°C, 5 min) supernatant were discarded and cells incubated with monoclonal rabbit anti-p21waf/cip (Cell Signaling), polyclonal rabbit anti-Cyclin D1 (Santa Cruz), monoclonal mouse anti-γH2AX (Millipore), polyclonal rabbit IgG (Santa Cruz) or monoclonal mouse IgG1 (Millipore) respectively, diluted in blocking solution for 2 h at room temperature. Primary antibodies were detected using FITC-conjugated goat anti-rabbit or FITC-conjugated sheep anti-mouse (Dianova) antibodies for 1 h at room temperature. Finally, DNA was counterstained with 20 μg/ml PI and 40 μg/ml RNase A in PBS for 30 min at room temperature in the dark.
For DNA-synthesis analysis cells were incubated with 10 μM BrdU (Sigma) and analyzed as described previously . FACS data processing includes doublet discrimination and debris exclusion. All experiments were performed at least three times with similar results. Statistical analysis was performed with Student’s t-test. Annexin V staining has been performed according to manufacturer instruction (Life Technologies). Briefly, cells were washed once in PBS and trypsinized. After centrifugation (300 g, 8 min, 4°C) supernatant was removed and cells were washed again with PBS followed by re-centrifugation. Then, cell pellet (maximum 106 cells) was resuspended in 100 μl of annexin V binding buffer and 5 μl of annexin V were added. After an incubation period of 15 min at room temperature samples were diluted with 400 μl of annexin V binding buffer and re-centrifuged. Finally, cell pellets were resuspended in 100 μl annexin V binding buffer. PI (1 μg/ml, Miltenyi) was automatically added right before FACS measurement using MACSQuant analyzer (Miltenyi).
HCT116p53−/− shLuc and shSurv cells were analyzed using Spectral karyotyping (SKY), DAPI and Giemsa-staining. For preparation of metaphase chromosomes 72 h after transduction methotrexate (5 μg ml) was added for further 17 hours. Medium was removed and cells incubated in fresh medium with 150 μl BrdU-FUdR-solution at 37°C for 5 h. Cells were treated with colcemid for 60 min at a concentration of 0.035 μg/ml, incubated in 75 mM KCl for 20 minutes at 37°C, and fixed in a freshly prepared mixture of methanol/acetic acid (3:1) at room temperature. Cell suspension was dropped onto glass slides. Spectral karyotyping (SKY) analysis was performed as described previously . SKY images of about at least 20 metaphase chromosomes per cell line stained with a mixture of 5 fluorochromes were captured using an DMRXA epifluorescence microscope (Leica GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany), HCX PL SAPO 63x/1.30 oil objective (Leica), SpectraCube® system (Applied Spectral Imaging, Migdal HaEmek, Israel), and SKYView® imaging software (Applied Spectral Imaging). Additionally, metaphase chromosomes were stained with DAPI and Giemsa and number of chromosomes (ploidy), chromosomal breaks, and chromosomal aberrations (ring and dicentric chromosomes) per metaphase were counted. Statistical analysis was performed with Student’s t test. Mann–Whitney-U test was carried out to compare frequencies of breaks as well as ring and dicentric chromosomes.
We thank K. Robel for excellent technical assistance. pMD.G2 was kindly provided by D. Trono (University of Geneva, Switzerland). We would also like to thank Dr. K. Conrad (Institute of Immunology, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, for providing anti-centromeric antibodies. This work was supported by the Wilhelm Sander Stiftung (2008.065.1 to A.T.) the European Union and Free State of Saxony (EU-ESF GlioMath-DD to A.T.).
- Ambrosini G, Adida C, Altieri DC: A novel anti-apoptosis gene, survivin, expressed in cancer and lymphoma. Nat Med. 1997, 3: 917-921. 10.1038/nm0897-917View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Velculescu VE, Madden SL, Zhang L, Lash AE, Yu J, Rago C, Lal A, Wang CJ, Beaudry GA, Ciriello KM, Cook BP, Dufault MR, Ferguson AT, Gao Y, He TC, Hermeking H, Hiraldo SK, Hwang PM, Lopez MA, Luderer HF, Mathews B, Petroziello JM, Polyak K, Zawel L, Zhang W, Zhang X, Zhou W, Haluska FG, Jen J, Sukumar S: Analysis of human transcriptomes. Nat Genet. 1999, 23: 387-388.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Crook NE, Clem RJ, Miller LK: An apoptosis-inhibiting baculovirus gene with a zinc finger-like motif. J Virol. 1993, 67: 2168-2174.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Li F, Ambrosini G, Chu EY, Plescia J, Tognin S, Marchisio PC, Altieri DC: Control of apoptosis and mitotic spindle checkpoint by survivin. Nature. 1998, 396: 580-584. 10.1038/25141View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Li F, Ackermann EJ, Bennett CF, Rothermel AL, Plescia J, Tognin S, Villa A, Marchisio PC, Altieri DC: Pleiotropic cell-division defects and apoptosis induced by interference with survivin function. Nat Cell Biol. 1999, 1: 461-466. 10.1038/70242View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- O’Connor DS, Wall NR, Porter AC, Altieri DC: A p34(cdc2) survival checkpoint in cancer. Cancer Cell. 2002, 2: 43-54. 10.1016/S1535-6108(02)00084-3View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- O’Connor DS, Schechner JS, Adida C, Mesri M, Rothermel AL, Li F, Nath AK, Pober JS, Altieri DC: Control of apoptosis during angiogenesis by survivin expression in endothelial cells. Am J Pathol. 2000, 156: 393-398. 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64742-6PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shin S, Sung BJ, Cho YS, Kim HJ, Ha NC, Hwang JI, Chung CW, Jung YK, Oh BH: An anti-apoptotic protein human survivin is a direct inhibitor of caspase-3 and −7. Biochemistry. 2001, 40: 1117-1123. 10.1021/bi001603qView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Song Z, Yao X, Wu M: Direct interaction between survivin and Smac/DIABLO is essential for the anti-apoptotic activity of survivin during taxol-induced apoptosis. J Biol Chem. 2003, 278: 23130-23140. 10.1074/jbc.M300957200View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Carmena M, Wheelock M, Funabiki H, Earnshaw WC: The chromosomal passenger complex (CPC): from easy rider to the godfather of mitosis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2012, 13: 789-803. 10.1038/nrm3474PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Uren AG, Wong L, Pakusch M, Fowler KJ, Burrows FJ, Vaux DL, Choo KH: Survivin and the inner centromere protein INCENP show similar cell-cycle localization and gene knockout phenotype. Curr Biol. 2000, 10: 1319-1328. 10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00769-7View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wheatley SP, Carvalho A, Vagnarelli P, Earnshaw WC: INCENP is required for proper targeting of Survivin to the centromeres and the anaphase spindle during mitosis. Curr Biol. 2001, 11: 886-890. 10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00238-XView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gassmann R, Carvalho A, Henzing AJ, Ruchaud S, Hudson DF, Honda R, Nigg EA, Gerloff DL, Earnshaw WC: Borealin: a novel chromosomal passenger required for stability of the bipolar mitotic spindle. J Cell Biol. 2004, 166: 179-191. 10.1083/jcb.200404001PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ruchaud S, Carmena M, Earnshaw WC: The chromosomal passenger complex: one for all and all for one. Cell. 2007, 131: 230-231. 10.1016/j.cell.2007.10.002View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lens SM, Rodriguez JA, Vader G, Span SW, Giaccone G, Medema RH: Uncoupling the central spindle-associated function of the chromosomal passenger complex from its role at centromeres. Mol Biol Cell. 2006, 17: 1897-1909. 10.1091/mbc.E05-08-0727PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vader G, Cruijsen CW, van HT, Vromans MJ, Medema RH, Lens SM: The chromosomal passenger complex controls spindle checkpoint function independent from its role in correcting microtubule kinetochore interactions. Mol Biol Cell. 2007, 18: 4553-4564. 10.1091/mbc.E07-04-0328PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hauf S, Cole RW, LaTerra S, Zimmer C, Schnapp G, Walter R, Heckel A, van MJ, Rieder CL, Peters JM: The small molecule Hesperadin reveals a role for Aurora B in correcting kinetochore-microtubule attachment and in maintaining the spindle assembly checkpoint. J Cell Biol. 2003, 161: 281-294. 10.1083/jcb.200208092PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Carvalho A, Carmena M, Sambade C, Earnshaw WC, Wheatley SP: Survivin is required for stable checkpoint activation in taxol-treated HeLa cells. J Cell Sci. 2003, 116: 2987-2998. 10.1242/jcs.00612View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lens SM, Wolthuis RM, Klompmaker R, Kauw J, Agami R, Brummelkamp T, Kops G, Medema RH: Survivin is required for a sustained spindle checkpoint arrest in response to lack of tension. EMBO J. 2003, 22: 2934-2947. 10.1093/emboj/cdg307PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lampson MA, Renduchitala K, Khodjakov A, Kapoor TM: Correcting improper chromosome-spindle attachments during cell division. Nat Cell Biol. 2004, 6: 232-237.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Temme A, Rieger M, Reber F, Lindemann D, Weigle B, estelkoetter-Bachert P, Ehninger G, Tatsuka M, Terada Y, Rieber EP: Localization, dynamics, and function of survivin revealed by expression of functional survivinDsRed fusion proteins in the living cell. Mol Biol Cell. 2003, 14: 78-92. 10.1091/mbc.E02-04-0182PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Delacour-Larose M, Molla A, Skoufias DA, Margolis RL, Dimitrov S: Distinct dynamics of Aurora B and Survivin during mitosis. Cell Cycle. 2004, 3: 1418-1426. 10.4161/cc.3.11.1203View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Minoshima Y, Kawashima T, Hirose K, Tonozuka Y, Kawajiri A, Bao YC, Deng X, Tatsuka M, Narumiya S, May WS, Nosaka T, Semba K, Inoue T, Satoh T, Inagaki M, Kitamura T: Phosphorylation by aurora B converts MgcRacGAP to a RhoGAP during cytokinesis. Dev Cell. 2003, 4: 549-560. 10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00089-3View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Temme A, Herzig E, Weigle B, Morgenroth A, Schmitz M, Kiessling A, Rieger MA, Schackert HK, Rieber EP: Inhibition of malignant glioma cell growth by a survivin mutant retrovirus. Hum Gene Ther. 2005, 16: 209-222. 10.1089/hum.2005.16.209View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kaur H, Bekier ME, Taylor WR: Regulation of Borealin by phosphorylation at serine 219. J Cell Biochem. 2010, 111: 1291-1298. 10.1002/jcb.22853View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hendruschk S, Wiedemuth R, Aigner A, Topfer K, Cartellieri M, Martin D, Kirsch M, Ikonomidou C, Schackert G, Temme A: RNA interference targeting survivin exerts antitumoral effects in vitro and in established glioma xenografts in vivo. Neuro Oncol. 2011, 13: 1074-1089. 10.1093/neuonc/nor098PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wang Z, Fukuda S, Pelus LM: Survivin regulates the p53 tumor suppressor gene family. Oncogene. 2004, 23: 8146-8153. 10.1038/sj.onc.1207992View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Beltrami E, Plescia J, Wilkinson JC, Duckett CS, Altieri DC: Acute ablation of survivin uncovers p53-dependent mitotic checkpoint functions and control of mitochondrial apoptosis. J Biol Chem. 2004, 279: 2077-2084. 10.1074/jbc.M309479200View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Okada H, Bakal C, Shahinian A, Elia A, Wakeham A, Suh WK, Duncan GS, Ciofani M, Rottapel R, Zuniga-Pflucker JC, Mak TW: Survivin loss in thymocytes triggers p53-mediated growth arrest and p53-independent cell death. J Exp Med. 2004, 199: 399-410.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hoffman WH, Biade S, Zilfou JT, Chen J, Murphy M: Transcriptional repression of the anti-apoptotic survivin gene by wild type p53. J Biol Chem. 2002, 277: 3247-3257. 10.1074/jbc.M106643200View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mirza A, McGuirk M, Hockenberry TN, Wu Q, Ashar H, Black S, Wen SF, Wang L, Kirschmeier P, Bishop WR, Nielsen LL, Pickett CB, Liu S: Human survivin is negatively regulated by wild-type p53 and participates in p53-dependent apoptotic pathway. Oncogene. 2002, 21: 2613-2622. 10.1038/sj.onc.1205353View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mayo LD, Dixon JE, Durden DL, Tonks NK, Donner DB: PTEN protects p53 from Mdm2 and sensitizes cancer cells to chemotherapy. J Biol Chem. 2002, 277: 5484-5489. 10.1074/jbc.M108302200View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Paul R, Wollman R, Silkworth WT, Nardi IK, Cimini D, Mogilner A: Computer simulations predict that chromosome movements and rotations accelerate mitotic spindle assembly without compromising accuracy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009, 106: 15708-15713. 10.1073/pnas.0908261106PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Guerrero AA, Martinez A, van Wely KH: Merotelic attachments and non-homologous end joining are the basis of chromosomal instability. Cell Div. 2010, 5: 13- 10.1186/1747-1028-5-13PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Matsuoka S, Rotman G, Ogawa A, Shiloh Y, Tamai K, Elledge SJ: Ataxia telangiectasia-mutated phosphorylates Chk2 in vivo and in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000, 97: 10389-10394. 10.1073/pnas.190030497PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hirao A, Kong YY, Matsuoka S, Wakeham A, Ruland J, Yoshida H, Liu D, Elledge SJ, Mak TW: DNA damage-induced activation of p53 by the checkpoint kinase Chk2. Science. 2000, 287: 1824-1827. 10.1126/science.287.5459.1824View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lees-Miller SP, Sakaguchi K, Ullrich SJ, Appella E, Anderson CW: Human DNA-activated protein kinase phosphorylates serines 15 and 37 in the amino-terminal transactivation domain of human p53. Mol Cell Biol. 1992, 12: 5041-5049.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ciosk R, Zachariae W, Michaelis C, Shevchenko A, Mann M, Nasmyth K: An ESP1/PDS1 complex regulates loss of sister chromatid cohesion at the metaphase to anaphase transition in yeast. Cell. 1998, 93: 1067-1076. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81211-8View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Glotzer M, Murray AW, Kirschner MW: Cyclin is degraded by the ubiquitin pathway. Nature. 1991, 349: 132-138. 10.1038/349132a0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pinsky BA, Kung C, Shokat KM, Biggins S: The Ipl1-Aurora protein kinase activates the spindle checkpoint by creating unattached kinetochores. Nat Cell Biol. 2006, 8: 78-83. 10.1038/ncb1341View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tu SP, Jiang XH, Lin MC, Cui JT, Yang Y, Lum CT, Zou B, Zhu YB, Jiang SH, Wong WM, Chan AO, Yuen MF, Lam SK, Kung HF, Wong BC: Suppression of survivin expression inhibits in vivo tumorigenicity and angiogenesis in gastric cancer. Cancer Res. 2003, 63: 7724-7732.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Saito T, Hama S, Izumi H, Yamasaki F, Kajiwara Y, Matsuura S, Morishima K, Hidaka T, Shrestha P, Sugiyama K, Kurisu K: Centrosome amplification induced by survivin suppression enhances both chromosome instability and radiosensitivity in glioma cells. Br J Cancer. 2008, 98: 345-355. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604160PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yang D, Welm A, Bishop JM: Cell division and cell survival in the absence of survivin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004, 101: 15100-15105. 10.1073/pnas.0406665101PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vogel C, Kienitz A, Hofmann I, Muller R, Bastians H: Crosstalk of the mitotic spindle assembly checkpoint with p53 to prevent polyploidy. Oncogene. 2004, 23: 6845-6853. 10.1038/sj.onc.1207860View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chakravarti A, Zhai GG, Zhang M, Malhotra R, Latham DE, Delaney MA, Robe P, Nestler U, Song Q, Loeffler J: Survivin enhances radiation resistance in primary human glioblastoma cells via caspase-independent mechanisms. Oncogene. 2004, 23: 7494-7506. 10.1038/sj.onc.1208049View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Reichert S, Rodel C, Mirsch J, Harter PN, Tomicic MT, Mittelbronn M, Kaina B, Rodel F: Survivin inhibition and DNA double-strand break repair: a molecular mechanism to overcome radioresistance in glioblastoma. Radiother Oncol. 2011, 101: 51-58. 10.1016/j.radonc.2011.06.037View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Capalbo G, Dittmann K, Weiss C, Reichert S, Hausmann E, Rodel C, Rodel F: Radiation-induced survivin nuclear accumulation is linked to DNA damage repair. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010, 77: 226-234. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.12.001View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tamm I, Wang Y, Sausville E, Scudiero DA, Vigna N, Oltersdorf T, Reed JC: IAP-family protein survivin inhibits caspase activity and apoptosis induced by Fas (CD95), Bax, caspases, and anticancer drugs. Cancer Res. 1998, 58: 5315-5320.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Croci DO, Cogno IS, Vittar NB, Salvatierra E, Trajtenberg F, Podhajcer OL, Osinaga E, Rabinovich GA, Rivarola VA: Silencing survivin gene expression promotes apoptosis of human breast cancer cells through a caspase-independent pathway. J Cell Biochem. 2008, 105: 381-390. 10.1002/jcb.21836View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Grossman D, Kim PJ, Blanc-Brude OP, Brash DE, Tognin S, Marchisio PC, Altieri DC: Transgenic expression of survivin in keratinocytes counteracts UVB-induced apoptosis and cooperates with loss of p53. J Clin Invest. 2001, 108: 991-999. 10.1172/JCI13345PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhang W, Hanks AN, Boucher K, Florell SR, Allen SM, Alexander A, Brash DE, Grossman D: UVB-induced apoptosis drives clonal expansion during skin tumor development. Carcinogenesis. 2005, 26: 249-257.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- LaCasse EC, Baird S, Korneluk RG, MacKenzie AE: The inhibitors of apoptosis (IAPs) and their emerging role in cancer. Oncogene. 1998, 17: 3247-3259.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jaattela M: Escaping cell death: survival proteins in cancer. Exp Cell Res. 1999, 248: 30-43. 10.1006/excr.1999.4455View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fukuda S, Mantel CR, Pelus LM: Survivin regulates hematopoietic progenitor cell proliferation through p21WAF1/Cip1-dependent and -independent pathways. Blood. 2004, 103: 120-127. 10.1182/blood-2003-05-1756View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kops GJ, Weaver BA, Cleveland DW: On the road to cancer: aneuploidy and the mitotic checkpoint. Nat Rev Cancer. 2005, 5: 773-785. 10.1038/nrc1714View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nguyen HG, Makitalo M, Yang D, Chinnappan D, St HC, Ravid K: Deregulated Aurora-B induced tetraploidy promotes tumorigenesis. FASEB J. 2009, 23: 2741-2748. 10.1096/fj.09-130963PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Allen SM, Florell SR, Hanks AN, Alexander A, Diedrich MJ, Altieri DC, Grossman D: Survivin expression in mouse skin prevents papilloma regression and promotes chemical-induced tumor progression. Cancer Res. 2003, 63: 567-572.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Small S, Keerthivasan G, Huang Z, Gurbuxani S, Crispino JD: Overexpression of survivin initiates hematologic malignancies in vivo. Leukemia. 2010, 24: 1920-1926. 10.1038/leu.2010.198PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Temme A, Geiger KD, Wiedemuth R, Conseur K, Pietsch T, Felsberg J, Reifenberger G, Tatsuka M, Hagel C, Westphal M, Berger H, Simon M, Weller M, Schackert G: Giant cell glioblastoma is associated with altered aurora b expression and concomitant p53 mutation. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2010, 69: 632-642. 10.1097/NEN.0b013e3181e4c06eView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brummelkamp TR, Bernards R, Agami R: A system for stable expression of short interfering RNAs in mammalian cells. Science. 2002, 296: 550-553. 10.1126/science.1068999View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Carlessi L, De FL, Lecis D, Vescovi A, Delia D: DNA-damage response, survival and differentiation in vitro of a human neural stem cell line in relation to ATM expression. Cell Death Differ. 2009, 16: 795-806. 10.1038/cdd.2009.10View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, Preibisch S, Rueden C, Saalfeld S, Schmid B, Tinevez JY, White DJ, Hartenstein V, Eliceiri K, Tomancak P, Cardona A: Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012, 9: 676-682. 10.1038/nmeth.2019View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schrock E, Veldman T, Padilla-Nash H, Ning Y, Spurbeck J, Jalal S, Shaffer LG, Papenhausen P, Kozma C, Phelan MC, Kjeldsen E, Schonberg SA, O'Brien P, Biesecker L, du Manoir S, Ried T: Spectral karyotyping refines cytogenetic diagnostics of constitutional chromosomal abnormalities. Hum Genet. 1997, 101: 255-262. 10.1007/s004390050626View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.