- Open Access
Hypoxia and estrogen are functionally equivalent in breast cancer-endothelial cell interdependence
Molecular Cancervolume 11, Article number: 80 (2012)
Rapid breast tumor development relies on formation of new vasculature to supply the growing malignancy with oxygenated blood. Previously we found that estrogen aided in this neovasculogenesis via recruitment of bone marrow derived endothelial progenitor cells (BM-EPCs), leading to increased vessel formation and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) production in vivo. However, the cellular mechanism of this induction and the signaling pathways involved need elucidation.
Using the murine mammary cell line TG1-1 we observed estrogen (E2) lead to an up regulation of hypoxia inducible factor-1 (HIF-1), an effect abrogated by the anti-estrogen Fulvestrant and the HIF-1 inhibitor YC-1 (3-(5’-hydroxymethyl-2’-furyl)-1-benzylindazole) suggesting the interchangeability of hypoxia and estrogen mediated effects. Estrogen modulation of HIF-1 and subsequent effects on endothelial cells is dependent on the Akt/PI3K pathway and protein synthesis as validated by the use of the inhibitors wortmannin and cycloheximide which abrogated estrogen’s effects respectively. Estrogen treated TG1-1 cells secreted higher levels of VEGF which were comparable to secreted levels from cells grown under hypoxic conditions. Soluble factors in conditioned media from E2 treated breast cancer cells also lead to migration and tube formation of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) in vitro.
Our data provide evidence that estrogen signaling mediates the tumor vasculogenic process required for breast cancer progression and involves a key regulator of the hypoxia signaling pathway. Further, hypoxia and estrogen are interchangeable as both similarly modulate epithelial-endothelial cell interaction.
Breast cancer is recognized as the most common type of cancer in women and its development is associated with many risk factors such as diet, alcohol consumption, child bearing, breast feeding, oral contraception, as well as underlying genetic predisposition. Epidemiological studies show a rapid increase in breast cancer incidence during reproductive years that tapers around age 50, corresponding to the onset of menopause, and studies of postmenopausal breast cancer patients have found a higher level of estrogen in breast tissue compared to healthy patient tissue[1–6]. Taken together with the fact that 60-70% of human breast cancers are estrogen receptor-alpha positive, the evidence suggests an etiological significance of estrogen in breast cancer initiation and progression.
Estrogen is a sex steroid hormone produced mostly by the ovaries in women; however other tissues, including adipose, are also able to synthesize estrogen. There are a total of nine estrogens in humans of which 17β-Estradiol (E2) is the most abundant in circulation and the most biologically active. Estrogen mediates its effects by binding to its cognate estrogen receptor(s), either estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) or estrogen receptor beta (ERβ), leading to ER dimerization and association with various co-factors. Once formed, the complex translocates to the nucleus where it acts as a transcription factor by binding to the estrogen response elements (EREs) at the promoters of estrogen responsive genes[9, 10]. Besides this classical pathway, estrogen can also regulate gene transcription in ERE independent as well as nongenomic pathways by binding to membrane associated estrogen receptor leading to signaling via the PI3K/AKT pathway[11, 12]. In addition to its normal physiological roles, estrogen is also implicated in breast cancer initiation and progression. Estrogen-ER interactions have been observed to increase cell survival by signaling through the AKT pathway which leads to suppression of TNF-α induced apoptosis. Estrogen-ER signaling also induces cell proliferation by activation of the PI3K pathway, observed in breast cancer cell lines including ER+ MCF-7 cells, but not the ER- MDA-MB-231 cell line. Interestingly, estrogen is also capable of contributing to breast cancer progression by a novel role, via modulation of proteins involved in hypoxia signaling, namely hypoxia inducible factor 1 (HIF-1).
HIF-1 is also a heterodimeric transcription factor, consisting of the oxygen dependent alpha subunit and the constitutively expressed beta subunit. During normoxia, HIF-1α is rapidly degraded via the proteasomal pathway, however during hypoxia, HIF-1α is stabilized and binds HIF-1β (aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator, ARNT), forming a transcriptional complex which translocates to the nucleus where, with other protein co-factors, it binds hypoxia responsive elements (HRE). Binding of HIF-1 to target genes leads to transcription of proangiogenic proteins including erythropoietin and VEGF, which are essential for formation of new blood vessels, or neovasculogenesis. Further, the chemotactic protein stromal derived factor 1 (SDF-1) is also hypoxia responsive, leading to development of a chemotactic gradient for bone marrow derived cells that express the cognate receptor CXCR4[17–19]. In a rat uterine model, estrogen was observed to increase HIF-1α levels in vivo and this induction lead to an increase in VEGF expression that was abrogated by PI3K inhibitors but not MAPK inhibitors[20, 21]. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays found that this estrogen treatment lead to binding of both ER and HIF-1 to VEGF promoters. E2 also lead to up regulation of HIF-1 in ovarian cancer cells in a PI3K dependent manner[23, 24]. ER positive breast cancers have also been linked to an increased expression of HIF-1 and correlated with a more metastatic phenotype[25, 26]. The ability of estrogen to stimulate proteins involved in hypoxia signaling as well as to induce proangiogenic proteins may elucidate a novel role of estrogen in breast cancer neovasculogenesis. This novel physiological effect of estrogen in carcinogenesis progression is an understudied area and can shed light on the systemic activity of hormone induced cancers.
Neovasculogenesis, or the formation of new blood vessels, is modulated by estrogen and is necessary for tumor growth and sustainment. Studies using ER knockout mice observed reduced vascular repair and angiogenesis thus demonstrating the role of estrogen in vessel formation. In ex vivo breast tissue cultures, as well as in vivo mouse models, E2 led to an increase in secretion of the proangiogenic cytokine IL-8, which is strongly correlated with the metastatic potential of breast cancer cells. Further, E2 increased angiogenin secretion, which led to an increase in endothelial cell proliferation and was abrogated by the antiestrogen Tamoxifen. In breast tumor mouse studies, E2 was observed to increase blood vessel formation and significantly increased endothelial progenitor cell migration to tumor sites. Further, E2 also enhanced mRNA transcripts of proangiogenic angiopoietins 1 and 2, as well as metastatic modulating matrix metalloproteinase 2 and 9. In vitro models from our laboratory demonstrated E2 induced TG1-1 cell proliferation and migration, which was abrogated by anti-estrogens. In vitro tubulogenesis models have also demonstrated the role in E2 induced neovasculogenesis in breast cancer. Considering that both hypoxia and estrogen are significant determinants of breast cancer progression and can modulate vasculogenesis processes and hence the tumor microenvironment, it is important to understand their cellular modulation so that novel intervention strategies can be examined.
This study was designed to investigate the role of estrogen on HIF-1 dependent breast cancer induced neovasculogenesis. Two types of cell lines were used: the TG1-1 murine breast cancer cell line that expresses both ERα and ERβ and the human endothelial cell line human umbilical vein endothelial cell (HUVEC). Our results define the molecular interdependence of estrogen mediated intracellular activity with hypoxia and reconnect the modulatory interdependence of cellular phenotypic changes. These studies open up new avenues of estrogen based therapeutic and preventive interventions for breast cancer that is based on the tumor microenvironment.
Hypoxia induces HIF-1α nuclear translocation in TG1-1 cells
First to determine whether TG1-1 cells are indeed responsive to hypoxia, we cultured cells under hypoxic conditions, specifically 1% O2, in a sealed hypoxic chamber for the indicated number of hours. We observed an increase in HIF-1α in nuclear lysates and used TATA binding protein (TBP) as a nuclear loading control (Figure1A). Cells were also treated with cobalt chloride (CoCl2), a HIF prolyl hydroxylase antagonist, used as a positive control for HIF-1α induction (Figure1B). HIF-1α accumulation peaked rapidly between 3-6 hours for both treatments and then returned to basal levels. To further demonstrate HIF-1α localization to the nucleus, TG1-1 cells were either untreated (left) or treated with CoCl2 (right) for 24 hours and stained for VEGF (green) and HIF-1α (red). The panel on the right demonstrates an increase in HIF-1α staining intensity as well as co-localization with the nuclear DAPI stain compared to the left panel with low level diffuse HIF-1α cellular staining. Together these suggest that HIF-1α is an acceptable readout of hypoxia in TG1-1 cells.
Estrogen induces HIF-1α in breast cancer cells in vitro
Recent work has focused on the oxygen independent activation of HIF-1α in hormone responsive tissues by estrogen. To verify whether estrogen was able to induce HIF-1α in breast cancer cells in vitro, we treated the estrogen receptor positive TG1-1 cells with E2 and observed an induction of HIF-1α in nuclear lysates at approximately 24 hours (Figure2A). Further, treatment of cells for 24 hours with E2 and the pure anti-estrogen Fulvestrant abrogated E2 induced accumulation of HIF-1α comparable to cells treated with the HIF-1α inhibitor YC1 (Figure2B) validating the E2 stimulation of HIF-1α.
Estrogen induces VEGF similar to hypoxia in TG1-1 cells in a HIF-1α dependent manner
Stimulation of HIF-1α leads to dimerization with HIF-1β and nuclear translocation, where the heterodimer acts as a transcription factor leading to production of pro-angiogenic proteins. To test whether HIF-1α induction was functional, cytoplasmic cell lysates were isolated from TG1-1 cells treated with CoCl2 and E2 and western blots performed and probed for vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Consistent with previous literature, hypoxia signaling leads to the expression of the pro-angiogenic protein VEGF in breast cancer cells in vitro (Figure3A). We also observed an increase in VEGF in cells treated with E2 for 24 hours, an effect abrogated by Fulvestrant and more profoundly byYC1 (Figure3B). To measure functional secretion of VEGF, we performed and ELISA and observed a marked increase in VEGF secretion when cells were treated with E2 or grown under hypoxic conditions (1% O2). Similar to western blot observation, treatment of cells with YC-1 abrogated VEGF secretion, thus demonstrating the importance on HIF-1 in estrogen induced VEGF secretion (Figure3C). Thus, the pro-angiogenic effect of E2 on breast cancer cells is not solely dependent on the nuclear translocation of estrogen receptor (ER) but rather on HIF-1α translocation as well.
Estrogen signals via the PI3K pathway leading to induction of VEGF in a HIF-1α dependent manner
We present evidence that E2 stimulation of HIF-1α and VEGF is PI3K dependent. TG1-1 cells treated with E2 for 24 hours show an increase in PI3K levels, an effect abrogated by Fulvestrant, further indicating functional ER signaling (Figure4A). Treatment of TG1-1 cells with E2 for 24 hours in conjunction with the PI3K inhibitor Wortmannin prevented E2 up regulation of HIF-1α (Figure4B). We observed the inhibition of PI3K also diminished E2 stimulation of VEGF in cells treated for 24 hours (Figure4C). Thus, E2 signals via the PI3K pathway to stimulate HIF-1α, and inhibition of this prosurvival pathway abrogates E2 induction of angiogenic proteins.
Secretion of estrogen responsive proteins via HIF-1α up regulation by breast cancer cells leads to an increase in endothelial cell migration and tubulogenesis in vitro
Lastly, we sought to determine the cellular mechanism of estrogen induced neovasculogenesis in breast cancer progression. The process of neovasculogenesis is indispensible for tumor proliferation and metastasis and occurs largely in hypoxic tissues in which rapid tumor development quickly outgrows existing vasculature. Previously data from our laboratory demonstrated that E2 enhanced breast tumor neovasculogenesis in vivo, however the mechanism remains unclear. To address this question, culture media from TG1-1 cells treated with E2 with and without the anti-estrogen Fulvestrant or the HIF-1α inhibitor YC1 was used in an in vitro migration assay of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs), culture media from untreated TG1-1 cells served as a control. We observed a significant increase in HUVEC migration toward the media of E2 treated cells, which was abrogated by Fulvestrant as well as YC1 (Figure5A). Thus, E2 stimulation of HIF-1α and consequent up regulation of VEGF leads to endothelial cell migration toward breast tumor cell secreted proteins. HUVEC migration experiments in which TG1-1 cells cultured under hypoxic conditions (1% O2) with and without E2 and Fulvestrant also demonstrated only a modest synergistic effect of hypoxia and estrogen on endothelial cell migration which was not abrogated by the anti-estrogen (Figure5B). To further characterize the role of estrogen we focused on another phenotypic characteristic of vasculogenesis in vitro, namely the formation of tube shaped structures by endothelial cells utilizing the tubulogenesis assay. Briefly, HUVEC cells were plated over a bed of matrigel to simulate extracellular matrix and were exposed to either control basal media or conditioned media harvested from TG1-1 cultured cells as previously mentioned. We observed an increase in tube number and length when endothelial cells were treated with tumor cell condition media from E2 stimulated cells (Figure6B). Estrogen induced tubulogenesis was abrogated in the presence of the anti-estrogen Fulvestrant (ICI), the HIF-1 inhibitor YC1, and cycloheximide. Analysis of lysates from tumor cells revealed that cycloheximide treatment prevents estrogen upregulation of HIF-1α, highlighting the importance of de novo protein synthesis in estrogen induced vasculogenesis in vitro (Figure6A). Media from TG1-1 cells grown under hypoxic conditions and concurrently treated with estrogen and inhibitors was also investigated for the impact on endothelial cell tube formation. When comparing conditioned media from tumor cells simultaneously grown under hypoxic conditions (1% O2) with those also treated with E2, we observed an increase in tubule formation which was abrogated by the HIF-1 inhibitor (Figure6C). This further highlights the importance of both hypoxia and estrogen as determinants of tumor induced neovasculogenesis.
During tissue and tumor hypoxia, existing vasculature is exhausted and resident cells secrete factors including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and stromal derived factor 1 (SDF-1) with the migration of bone marrow derived endothelial progenitor cells as a significant event. Endothelial cell migration, however, is reliant on expression of cell surface receptors such as VEGFR1 and 2, and CXCR-4, which bind VEGF and SDF-1 respectively. During rapid tumor development tumor and stromal cells create an angiogenic milieu conducive to rapid expansion of the vasculature. We had earlier demonstrated that vasculogenesis is an estrogen mediated phenomenon. A decrease in oxygen tension is a significant determinant of tumor progression and tumors rapidly adapt to their changed metabolic intracellular milieu however as evidenced by this study systemically they continue to mimic physiological processes such as estrogen mediated activity. The molecular mechanisms by which estrogen and hypoxia (low oxygen tension) impact tumor development are only recently being uncovered.
Numerous studies have implicated hormones in the activation of hypoxia inducible factor 1 (HIF-1). HIF-1 is a heterodimeric transcription factor composed of the oxygen sensitive alpha subunit and the constitutively present beta subunit. We have demonstrated a functional HIF-1 protein in our mouse mammary tumor cell line TG1-1. TG1-1 cells are responsive to both the known HIF-1 stabilizer cobalt chloride as well as hypoxic culture conditions, specifically 1% O2, in which we observed stabilization of the HIF-1α subunit and its subsequent translocation into the nucleus. However a decrease in oxygen concentration is not the only activator of HIF-1 stabilization and translocation as demonstrated by us in this study and elsewhere. He et al. found that in obesity models, insulin was able to up regulate both HIF-1 mRNA and protein levels in a PI3K/mTOR dependent manner. The interdependence of estrogen mediated cellular activity and hypoxia have been observed in various other cellular models. Kazi and Koos showed that in a rat uterine model, estrogen treatment lead to up regulation of VEGF, and found that both ERα and HIF-1α were recruited to the VEGF promoter. Further, they identified that the PI3K pathway was essential for this phenomenon. Hua et al. further demonstrated that E2 treatment leads to up regulation of HIF-1α in the ovarian cancer cell lines ES-2 and SKOV3 in a time dependent manner, peaking around 24 hours. In agreement with this finding, we also observed in increase in HIF-1α levels in our breast cancer cells at 24 hours treatment. This was interesting as the hypoxia mimetic, cobalt chloride, induced a much more rapid HIF-1α response. This finding may highlight an indirect role of estrogen in HIF-1α up regulation in which estrogen regulated proteins may lead to HIF-1α increases in an autocrine fashion. This secretory autocrine loop was demonstrated in androgen induced prostate cancer cell lines and thus may be functionally equivalent in many different hormone responsive tissues. These studies establish a link between estrogen mediated signal transduction and hypoxia in co-operating to regulate angiogenic factors. Earlier we had established that breast cancer induced tumorigenesis required the presence of endothelial progenitor cells and that the process of vasculogenesis was both tumor induced factor modulated and at the systemic level regulated by estrogens. Since hypoxia is the most common metabolic adaptation of rapidly proliferating breast cancer we attempted in this study to define the molecular link of hypoxia and estrogen.
Our studies clearly indicate that hypoxia mimics estrogen mediated function as determined by estrogen’s ability to regulate HIF-1α and VEGF, both of which are molecular mediators of hypoxic condition. The release of angiogenic factor VEGF had functional significance as evidenced by the ability of E2 treated TG1-1 conditioned media to enhance both migration and tubulogenesis which was responsive to antiestrogens and anti-hypoxia agents. We also provide evidence that inhibition of the E2-dependent PI3K up regulation inhibited HIF-1α translocation. This molecular interdependence was translatable at the cellular phenotypic level as both migration and tubulogenesis of endothelial cells were responsive to antiestrogens and anti-hypoxia agents.
Paracrine/autocrine protein secretion is important for both tumor cell and endothelial cell migration during tumor progression and metastasis. Voss et al. highlighted the importance of hypoxia mediated protein secretion in migration of breast cancer cells lines MCF-7, MDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-435S, and MDA-MB-468 using conditioned media and found that media of hypoxic cells increased migration of normoxic cells. Also, media harvested from hypoxic cells lead to an increase in neutrophil granulocyte migration. Similarly, Fujiwara et al. found hypoxia increased migration and invasiveness of glioma cell lines via up regulation of MMP-2 and a corresponding down regulation of TIMP-2. Further, HIF-1 induction also leads to expansion of glioma stem cells, which is dependent on Akt/ERK signaling. Perhaps the most documented role of hypoxia pertains to its importance in directing endothelial cell migration. Meininger, Shelling, and Granger noted that bovine aortic and coronary endothelial cells proliferated when exposed to 2% O2 and that this proliferation was most likely due to hypoxia mediated adenosine secretion. As early as 1992, Shweiki et al. observed a hypoxia dependent increase in VEGF in glioblastoma multiforme In situ in which cells spatially closer to necrotic centers produced more VEGF and that correspondingly more capillaries clustered near these VEGF producing cells. Other studies have observed the same phenomenon in other tumors including breast in which an increase in VEGF mRNA levels and small blood vessels were located in close proximity to ductal carcinoma in situ, infiltrating ductal carcinoma, and metastatic ductal carcinoma tumors when compared to normal or non-malignant breast tissue. In this and our previously published study we provide experimental evidence that estrogen and tumor derived angiogenic factors not only recruit endothelial progenitor cells and induce neovasculogenesis but that also established (as evidenced by the use of HUVEC cells) endothelial cell migration and tubulogenesis can be modulated by estrogen and hypoxic conditions. The observation that inhibition of the signal transduction pathway of estrogen can affect hypoxia and that anti-hypoxic agents can be interchangeably used with antiestrogenic agents in modulating both angiogenic processes and tumor phenotype opens up a novel intervention avenue that is molecular target based modulation of tumor microenvironment that is directed toward cell-cell interactions.
The complexity of the tumor microenvironment and the redundancy of the signaling pathways involved cannot be underestimated. Our data provides evidence that estrogen can molecularly mimic hypoxia by activating HIF-1α and that estrogen mediated HIF-1α induction requires a functional PI3K signaling pathway. This active interdependence presumably co-operates to produce an angiogenic environment conducive to endothelial cell migration and vasculogenesis. The continued hypoxic conditions in the tumor may lead to eventual ‘estrogen-independent’ cell type that at the signal transduction level produced estrogen inducible elements constitutively. These studies clearly suggest the need to test a combination of anti-estrogenic and anti-hypoxic agents as an intervention strategy for breast cancer prevention and therapy.
Materials and methods
The carcinoma cell line used for this study was TG1-1, a mouse mammary epithelial cell line, and the primary human endothelial cells HUVECs (human umbilical vein endothelial cells). TG1-1 was cultures in DMEM (Mediatech, Herndon, VA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Atlanta Biologicals, Atlanta, GA), penicillin 10,000 IU/mL, streptomycin 10,000 μg/mL (Mediatech) and 2mM L-glutamine (Mediatech). HUVEC (human umbilical vein endothelial cell) cells were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) (Manassas, VA) and grown in F12K (Mediatech) supplemented with 10% FBS, 0.1mg/mL Heparin, 0.03mg/mL endothelial cell growth supplement (Sigma Aldrich). Cells were grown at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2 unless otherwise noted. For the cellular factors studied in this manuscript, the estrogen dependent, hypoxia induced change TG1-1 cells respond to, specifically producing VEGF, were similar to human breast cancer cells and hence the interdependent interaction of TG1-1 and HUVEC was rationalized.
For experiments, TG1-1 cells were grown to 75-80% confluence and serum-starved overnight in phenol red-free DMEM (Mediatech) supplemented with penicillin and streptomycin. For hypoxia experiments cells were grown in 1% O2 in a modular incubator chamber (Billups-Rothenberg Inc.). Addition of E2 to breast cancer cells was always on serum starved cells so as to define the estrogenic mediated increase in protein expression.
Western blot analysis
Cells were harvested using 0.25% trypsin (Mediatech), washed with PBS, and lysed (1X106/100μL of lysis buffer) using the radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer [50mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, 0.2% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, 0.5% NP40, 1mM Pefabloc] and incubated on ice for 30 minutes with vortexing every 5 minutes. Samples were centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 30 minutes at 4°C then supernatants collected for whole cell lysates. For nuclear/cytoplasmic isolation we used the NE-PER Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Extraction Kit from Thermo Scientific and followed manufacturer’s directions. Cell lysates (10-20μg) were subjected to 10% SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions (presence of β-mercaptoethanol) as previously described. Proteins were transferred to Immobilon-P membranes at 220 mA for 2 h and membranes were blocked in 5% dried milk in TBST [200mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.4, 150mM NaCl, and 0.01% Tween-20 added fresh/liter of 1X TBS (TBST)] for 2 h at room temperature on a shaker. After blocking, membranes were incubated overnight at 4°C with either HIF-1α (Abcam, Cambridge, MA), TBP (Abcam), VEGF (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA), Actin (Santa Cruz), or PI3K (Cell Signaling Technology) antibody in TBST. Membranes were subsequently washed three times in TBST and incubated with the respective horseradish peroxidase (HRP) conjugated secondary antibody (Pierce, Rockford, IL), for 2 h at room temperature in TBST containing 2% dried milk. Membranes were then washed three times with TBST and developed using ECL substrate (Pierce) and detected on Denville autoradiography film.
VEGF Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)
The RayBio Mouse VEGF Quantikine ELISA Kit (RayBiotech, Inc.,) was used to quantitate the levels of VEGF in conditioned media obtained from TG1-1 cells according to manufacturer’s instructions. ELISA was performed on each sample in duplicate. Protein content of cell pellets was determined in duplicate by using the Bradford protein assay (Bio-Rad).
Transwell migration assay
BD Biocoat Control inserts (BD Biosciences, Bedford, MA) with 8-μm pore membrane filters were used for migration experiments as previously described. Briefly, TG1-1 cells were serum starved overnight for 16 h; the media was then replaced with serum free, phenol red-free DMEM (Mediatech) supplemented with ± 10-8 M Estradiol (Sigma Aldrich), ± 10-6 M Fulvestrant (Sigma), ± 10-5 M YC-1 and culture media was subsequently harvested 24 h later. Conversely, TG1-1 cells were incubated under hypoxic conditions and media collected after 24 h. HUVEC cells were then harvested by trypsinization and 2.5 x 104 cells were seeded in the upper chamber in 500 μl of serum-free, phenol red-free DMEM. The lower chamber contained 750 μl of the harvested TG1-1 media. After 18 h of incubation non-adherent cells were removed from the upper chamber using a cotton swab. Migrant cells on the lower surface were then fixed with 100% methanol and stained using 1% toluidine blue, 1% borax stain and then washed twice in distilled water. Inserts were allowed to dry and then visualized under 10x magnification. Experiments were performed in duplicate and data represents number of migrating cells per 10x field and normalized to cell counts of control treatment groups.
Endothelial tube formation assay
96 well plates were coated with 100 μl of growth factor reduced, phenol red-free Matrigel (BD Biosciences). HUVEC cells were harvested by trypsinization then added at a concentration of 10,000 cells/well in serum-free, phenol red-free DMEM or TG1-1 cell conditioned culture media as previously described. Plates were then incubated at 37°C for 4-6 h and visualized using 5x magnification, images were obtained using Axiovert 4.0.
TG1-1 cells were harvested as described and seeded at a density of 1 x 104 into 8 well chamber slides (Becton Dickson) in complete DMEM and were allowed to adhere 24 h. Media was then removed and replaced with serum-free, phenol red-free DMEM and cells were serum starved overnight. Starvation media was removed and replaced with DMEM supplemented with ± 10-8 M E2 ± 10-6 Fulvestrant ± 10-5 YC1 or grown under hypoxic conditions. Media was then removed and cells washed three times with phosphate buffered saline (PBS). Cells were then fixed with 4% para-formaldehyde at room temperature for 15 minutes then washed again three times with PBS. Cells were then permeabilized with 0.5% Triton-X for 5 min at room temperature and again washed three times with PBS. Cells were then blocked in 0.2% Triton-X, 10% goat serum (Sigma) and 3% bovine serum albumin (BSA) for 30 min at room temperature. Cells were then incubated overnight at 4°C with either HIF-1α or VEGF antibody in 1% BSA. Wells were then washed three times with PBS and incubated with the respective secondary antibody conjugated to either Alexa-fluor 488 or 595. Images were gathered using the Axiovision Rel 4.8 program under 40x magnification on the Axiovert 200M microscope (Carl Zeiss MicroImaging Inc., Thornwood, NY).
The data presented here represent three replicates. Statistical analysis was performed using the Student’s t-test. Differences were considered statistically significant at P<0.05. *=P<.001.
Bone marrow derived endothelial progenitor cell
Vascular endothelial growth factor
Hypoxia inducible factor 1
Human umbilical vein endothelial cell
Phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase
Estrogen receptor alpha/beta
Estrogen responsive element
Tumor necrosis factor alpha
Aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator
Stromal derived factor 1
Mitogen-activated protein kinase
Tata binding protein
Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1/2.
Key TJ, Verkasalo PK, Banks E: Epidemiology of breast cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2001, 2: 133-140. 10.1016/S1470-2045(00)00254-0
Kelsey JL, Horn-Ross PL: Breast cancer: magnitude of the problem and descriptive epidemiology. Epidemiol Rev. 1993, 15 (1): 7-16.
Kelsey JL, Bernstein L: Epidemiology and prevention of breast cancer. Annu Rev Public Health. 1996, 17: 47-67. 10.1146/annurev.pu.17.050196.000403
Lilienfeld AM: The epidemiology of breast cancer. Cancer Res. 1963, 23 (9): 1503-1513.
Habel LA, Stanford JL: Hormone receptors and breast cancer. Epidemiol Rev. 1993, 15: 209-219.
Li CI, Daling JR, Malone KE: Incidence of invasive breast cancer by hormone receptor status from 1992 to 1998. J Clin Oncol. 2003, 21 (1): 28-34. 10.1200/JCO.2003.03.088
Castoria G, Migliaccio A, Giovannelli P, Auricchio F: Cell proliferation regulated by estradiol receptor: Therapeutic implications. Steroids. 2010, 75: 524-527. 10.1016/j.steroids.2009.10.007
Björnström L, Sjöberg M: Mechanisms of estrogen receptor signaling: convergence of genomic and nongenomic actions on target genes. Mol Endocrinol. 2005, 19 (4): 833-842. 10.1210/me.2004-0486
Fox EM, Andrade J, Shupnik MA: Novel action of estrogen to promote proliferation: Integration of cytoplasmic and nuclear pathways. Steroids. 2009, 74: 622-627. 10.1016/j.steroids.2008.10.014
Levin ER: Plasma membrane estrogen receptors. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2009, 20 (10): 477-482. 10.1016/j.tem.2009.06.009
Manavathi B, Kumar R: Steering estrogen signals from the plasma membrane to the nucleus: two sides of the coin. J Cell Physiol. 2006, 207 (3): 594-604. 10.1002/jcp.20551
Sun M, Paciga JE, Feldman RI, Yuan Z, Coppola D, Lu YY, Shelley SA, Nicosia SV, Cheng JQ: Phosphatidylinositol-3-OH kinase (PI3K)/AKT2, activated in breast cancer, regulates and is induced by estrogen receptor α (ERα) via interaction between ERα and PI3K. Cancer Res. 2001, 61: 5985-5991.
Bratton MR, Duong BN, Elliott S, Weldon CB, Beckman BS, McLachlan JA, Burow ME: Regulation of ERalpha-mediated transcription of Bcl-2 by PI3K-AKT crosstalk: implications for breast cancer cell survival. Int J Oncol. 2010, 37 (3): 541-550.
Lee YR, Park J, Yu HN, Kim JS, Youn HJ, Jung SH: Up-regulation of PI3K/Akt signaling by 17β-estradiol through activation of estrogen receptor-α, but not estrogen receptor-β, and stimulates cell growth in breast cancer cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005, 336: 1221-1226. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.08.256
Kimbro KS, Simons JW: Hypoxia-inducible factor-1 in human breast and prostate cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2006, 13: 739-749. 10.1677/erc.1.00728
Weidemann A, Johnson RS: Biology of HIF-1α. Cell Death Differ. 2008, 15: 621-627. 10.1038/cdd.2008.12
Du R, Lu KV, Petritsch C, Liu P, Ganss R, Passegué E, Song H, VandenBerg S, Johnson RS, Werb Z, Bergers G: HIF1α induces the recruitment of bone marrow-derived vascular modulatory cells to regulate tumor angiogenesis and invasion. Cancer Cell. 2008, 13: 206-220. 10.1016/j.ccr.2008.01.034
Hoenig MR, Bianchi C, Sellke FW: Hypoxia inducible factor-1α, endothelial progenitor cells, monocytes, cardiovascular risk, wound healing, cobalt and hydralazine: a unifying hypothesis. Curr Drug Targets. 2008, 9: 422-435. 10.2174/138945008784221215
Russo TM, Di Vito M, Sale P, Pellegrini L, Schito L, Gentileschi S, Bracaglia R, Marandino F, Garaci E, Russo MA: Up-regulation of pro-inflammatory genes as adaptation to hypoxia in MCF-7 cells and in human mammary invasive carcinoma microenvironment. Cancer Sci. 2010, 101 (4): 1014-1023. 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2010.01493.x
Kazi AA, Koos RD: Estrogen-induced activation of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α, vascular endothelial growth factor expression, and edema in the uterus are mediated by the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt pathway. Endocrinology. 2007, 148 (5): 2363-2374. 10.1210/en.2006-1394
Kazi AA, Molitoris KH, Koos RD: Estrogen rapidly activates the PI3K/AKT pathway and hypoxia-inducible factor 1 and induces vascular endothelial growth factor A expression in luminal epithelial cells of the rat uterus. Biol Reprod. 2009, 81: 378-387. 10.1095/biolreprod.109.076117
Kazi AA, Jones JM, Koos RD: Chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis of gene expression in the rat uterus in vivo: estrogen-induced recruitment of both estrogen receptor alpha and hypoxia-inducible factor 1 to the vascular endothelial growth factor promoter. J Mol Endocrinol. 2005, 19: 2006-2019. 10.1210/me.2004-0388.
Hua K, Din J, Cao Q, Feng W, Zhang Y, Yao L, Huang Y, Zhao Y, Feng Y: Estrogen and progestin regulate HIF-1α expression in ovarian cancer cell lines via the activation of Akt signaling transduction pathway. Oncol Rep. 2009, 21: 893-898.
Gao N, Nester RA, Sarkar MA: 4-hydroxy estradiol but not 2-hydroxy estradiol induces expression of hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha and vascular endothelial growth factor A through phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt/FRAP pathway in OVCAR-3 and A2780-CP70 human ovarian carcinoma cells. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2004, 196: 124-135. 10.1016/j.taap.2003.12.002
Zhong H, De Marzo AM, Laughner E, Lim M, Hilton DA, Zagzag D, Buechler P, Isaacs WB, Semenza GL, Simons JW: Overexpression of hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha in common human cancers and their metastasis. Cancer Res. 1999, 59: 5830-5835.
Bos R, Zhong H, Hanrahan CF, Mommers EC, Semenza GL, Pinedo HM, Abeloff MD, Simons JW, van Diest PJ, van der Wall E: Levels of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α during breast carcinogenesis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001, 93 (4): 309-314. 10.1093/jnci/93.4.309
Gupta PB, Kuperwasser C: Contributions of estrogen to ER-negative breast tumor growth. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2006, 102: 71-78. 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2006.09.025
Bendrik C, Dabrosin C: Estradiol increases IL-8 secretion of normal human breast tissue and breast cancer in vivo. J Immunol. 2009, 182 (1): 371-378.
Nilsson UW, Abrahamsson A, Dabrosin C: Angiogenin regulation by estradiol in breast tissue: tamoxifen inhibits angiogenin nuclear translocation and antiangiogenin therapy reduces breast cancer growth In vivo. Clin Cancer Res. 2010, 16 (14): 3659-3669. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-0501
Suriano R, Chaudhuri D, Johnson RS, Lambers E, Ashok BT, Kishore R, Tiwari RK: 17β-estradiol mobilizes bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells to tumors. Cancer Res. 2008, 68: 6038-6042. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-1009
George AL, Bangalore-Prakash P, Rajoria S, Suriano R, Shanmugam A, Mittelman A, Tiwari RK: Endothelial progenitor cell biology in disease and tissue regeneration. J Hematol Oncol. 2011, 4: 24-32. 10.1186/1756-8722-4-24
He Q, Gao Z, Yin J, Zhang J, Yun Z, Ye J: Regulation of HIF-1α activity in adipose tissue by obesity-associated factors: adipogenesis, insulin, and hypoxia. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2011, 300 (5): 877-885. 10.1152/ajpendo.00626.2010.
Mabjeesh NJ, Willard MT, Frederickson CE, Zhong H, Simons JW: Androgens stimulate hypoxia-inducible factor 1 activation via autocrine loop of tyrosine kinase receptor/phoshatidylinositol 3-kinase/protein kinase B in prostate cancer cells. Clin Cancer Res. 2003, 9 (7): 2416-2425.
Voss MJ, Möller MF, Powe DG, Niggemann B, Zänker KS, Entschladen F: Luminal and basal-like breast cancer cells show increased migration induced by hypoxia, mediated by an autocrine mechanism. BMC Cancer. 2011, 11: 158-170. 10.1186/1471-2407-11-158
Fujiwara S, Nakagawa K, Harada H, Nagato S, Furukawa K, Teraoka M, Seno T, Oka K, Iwata S, Ohnishi T: Silencing hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha inhibits cell migration and invasion under hypoxic environment in malignant gliomas. Int J Oncol. 2007, 30 (4): 793-802.
Soeda A, Park M, Lee D, Mintz A, Androutsellis-Theotokis A, McKay RD, Engh J, Iwama T, Kunisada T, Kassam AB, Pollack IF, Park DM: Hypoxia promotes expansion of the CD133-positive glioma stem cells through activation of HIF-1α. Oncogene. 2009, 28: 3949-3959. 10.1038/onc.2009.252
Meininger CJ, Schelling ME, Granger HJ: Adenosine and hypoxia stimulate proliferation and migration of endothelial cells. Am J Physiol. 1988, 255: 554-562.
Shweiki D, Ahuva I, Soffer D, Keshet E: Vascular endothelial growth factor induced by hypoxia may mediate hypoxia-initiated angiogenesis. Nature. 1992, 359: 843-845. 10.1038/359843a0
Brown LF, Berse B, Jackman RW, Tognazzi K, Guidi AJ, Dvorak HF, Senger DR, Connolly JL, Schnitt SJ: Expression of vascular permeability factor (vascular endothelial growth factor) and its receptors in breast cancer. Hum Pathol. 1995, 26 (1): 86-91. 10.1016/0046-8177(95)90119-1
This work was supported by grant 1R01CA13194-01A2 from the National Cancer Institute.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
ALG contributed to conception and design of the study, carried out western blot, immunoflourescent, migration, and tubulogenesis studies, and contributed to drafting of the manuscript. SR participated in acquisition of data and drafting of the manuscript, RS participated in analysis and interpretation of the data and revising of the manuscript/contributing to intellectual content, AM provided reagents/analysis tools and contributed to intellectual content of the manuscript, RKT helped conceive the study, participated in design and coordination of the study and drafting the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.