- Open Access
Selective anticancer activity of a hexapeptide with sequence homology to a non-kinase domain of Cyclin Dependent Kinase 4
© Warenius et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
- Received: 9 February 2011
- Accepted: 13 June 2011
- Published: 13 June 2011
Cyclin-dependent kinases 2, 4 and 6 (Cdk2, Cdk4, Cdk6) are closely structurally homologous proteins which are classically understood to control the transition from the G1 to the S-phases of the cell cycle by combining with their appropriate cyclin D or cyclin E partners to form kinase-active holoenzymes. Deregulation of Cdk4 is widespread in human cancer, CDK4 gene knockout is highly protective against chemical and oncogene-mediated epithelial carcinogenesis, despite the continued presence of CDK2 and CDK6; and o verexpresssion of Cdk4 promotes skin carcinogenesis. Surprisingly, however, Cdk4 kinase inhibitors have not yet fulfilled their expectation as 'blockbuster' anticancer agents. Resistance to inhibition of Cdk4 kinase in some cases could potentially be due to a non-kinase activity, as recently reported with epidermal growth factor receptor.
A search for a potential functional site of non-kinase activity present in Cdk4 but not Cdk2 or Cdk6 revealed a previously-unidentified loop on the outside of the C'-terminal non-kinase domain of Cdk4, containing a central amino-acid sequence, Pro-Arg-Gly-Pro-Arg-Pro (PRGPRP). An isolated hexapeptide with this sequence and its cyclic amphiphilic congeners are selectively lethal at high doses to a wide range of human cancer cell lines whilst sparing normal diploid keratinocytes and fibroblasts. Treated cancer cells do not exhibit the wide variability of dose response typically seen with other anticancer agents. Cancer cell killing by PRGPRP, in a cyclic amphiphilic cassette, requires cells to be in cycle but does not perturb cell cycle distribution and is accompanied by altered relative Cdk4/Cdk1 expression and selective decrease in ATP levels. Morphological features of apoptosis are absent and cancer cell death does not appear to involve autophagy.
These findings suggest a potential new paradigm for the development of broad-spectrum cancer specific therapeutics with a companion diagnostic biomarker and a putative functional site for kinase-unrelated activities of Cdk4.
- programmed cell death
- selective anticancer
- broad spectrum
Cdk4 has been actively pursued, over the last two decades, as a promising anticancer drug target [1, 2] based on its role in cell cycle control  and its widespread deregulation in a multiplicity of different tumours . Single agent activity of cyclin dependent kinase inhibitors in general has, however, been disappointing, with low percentages of objective responses , and no Cdk inhibitor has yet been approved as an anticancer drug  In particular, the specific Cdk4 inhibitor, flavopiridol, yielded no objective responses in phase II studies of metastatic melanoma, endometrial adenocarcinoma and multiple myeloma  when used as a single agent. Following encouraging animal studies , newer Cdk4 kinase inhibitors such as PD 0332991, are now entering clinical trials in combination with agents of already proven activity such as bortezomib rather than as single agents. Nonetheless, CDK4 gene knockout in mice completely abrogates chemically induced epidermal carcinogenesis , without effect on normal skin keratinocyte proliferation, despite the continuing presence of Cdk2 and Cdk6. Conversely low levels or absence of Cdk6 do not prevent the in-vitro growth of human breast cancer cell lines . Additionally, ablation of CDK4 but not of CDK2 inhibits myc-mediated oral tumorigenesis. Furthermore, overexpression of Cdk4 but not cyclin D1 promotes mouse skin carcinogenesis , whilst elevated Cdk2 activity, despite inducing keratinocyte proliferation, is not tumorogenic . Cdk4 would therefore appear to be the key cyclin-dependent kinase for both chemical and oncogene promoted epithelial carcinogenesis. The poor activity of drugs directed against Cdk4 kinase is thus surprising.
The paradigm relating cell cycle control, cyclin-dependent kinases and cancer has changed from our classical understanding, however, with reappraisal of the mandatory requirement of Cdk2, Cdk4 or Cdk6 for normal cell division . Moreover, Cdk4 and Cdk6 have been shown to differ functionally from one another in several respects [16–19] and Cdk4 has been reported to be closely co-expressed with Cdk1 in a wide range of human cancers in-vitro and in malignant melanoma in the clinic but not in normal diploid fibroblasts or keratinocytes . Evidence is also now accumulating that Cdk4 can exhibit kinase-unrelated activities. Direct interaction of Cdk4 with Myo-D to restrict myoblast differentiation in the absence of Cdk4 kinase activity has been reported  and mutant, kinase-dead, CDK4-N158D upregulation in TIG3 cells can induce p16INK4 expression equally as well as kinase-active, wild-type CDK4 . Recently, resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors, in PCMM2 prostate cancer cells, has been reported to be related to a kinase-independent function of EGFR which prevents autophagy by maintaining intracellular glucose levels . Possibly the apparent discordance between results from CDK4 knockout cancer models, and Cdk4 kinase inhibitor studies could stem from such critical kinase-independent activities of Cdk4.
Divergent roles for Cdk4 and Cdk6 and evidence of kinase-unrelated activities in cyclin-dependent and other kinases along with the differences between Cdk4 and Cdk2 or Cdk6 in promoting carcinogenesis, prompted a search for a functional site of kinase-independent activity specific to Cdk4 but not Cdk2 or Cdk6. Binding sites for proteins intrinsic to classical Cdk4 kinase activity all lie predominantly within the N'-terminal 2/3 of the Cdk4 protein. Structural studies of the whole Cdk4, Cdk6 and Cdk2 molecules were therefore carried out to search for a potential kinase-independent functional site within the C'-terminal domain of Cdk4, not shared by Cdk6 or Cdk2. These studies revealed a previously-undescribed, proline/arginine rich, 12 amino-acid site, FPPRGPRPVQSV, on the outside surface of Cdk4.
Proteomic expression levels of Cdk1 and Cdk4 are closely correlated in human cancers but not normal cells  and have been shown to spontaneously go up and down together from experiment to experiment in several human cancer cell lines . Cdk4 overexpression following transfection is accompanied by concomitant increase in Cdk1 expression in RAMA37 cells  and disruption of Cdk1/Cdk4 co-expression can be observed in human cancer cells undergoing spontaneous cell death . Possibly the FPPRGPRPVQSV region of Cdk4 might be involved in control of Cdk1 expression. Such a mechanism could be vulnerable to competitive inhibition, disrupting the Cdk1/Cdk4 co-relationship and potentially destabilising malignant cells. To test this possibility, human cancer cells were exposed to peptide fragments of varying length derived from the FPPRGPRPVQSV sequence and the effects on cell proliferation and relative Cdk1/Cdk4 levels monitored.
Proteomic co-expression of Cdk1/Cdk4 in human cancer cell lines is not seen with Cdk1/Cdk2 or Cdk1/Cdk6
Previous experiments have demonstrated a causal relationship between Cdk4 and Cdk1 expression in 10 positive clones from RAMA37 cells transfected with CDK4 cDNA . To confirm this relationship in a different system, an ecdysone-inducible CDK4 expression vector was introduced to 2780 human ovarian carcinoma cells and positive transfectants selected. Induction of exogenous Cdk4 expression by 1 μM muristerone (Figure 1B) in this system, was accompanied by contemporaneous increase in Cdk1 protein. In addition there was no change in the phosphorylation status of the retinoblastoma protein.
Prior to recent reports [4, 26] of a crystal structure for Cdk4, it was necessary to use the considerable sequence homology across the Cdk protein family to produce a comparative model. Related sequences and important regions within the Cdk4 molecule were identified, a model of Cdk4 based on experimentally determined structures of Cdk6 and Cdk2 was built and regions in the Cdk4 model that might provide support for a kinase-unrelated binding site were sought. Although the protein data bank contained a model structure for Cdk4 (1LD2), an independent model was built which might provide advantageous additional insights. Sequence alignment of Homo Sapiens Cdk4 with a range of Cdk4 sequences from mammalian and non-mammalian organisms was initially performed.
For the N'-terminal half of the non-mammalian sequences of Cdk4, corresponding to the first domain and responsible for the majority of its function, the sequence is well conserved. However, the C'-terminal third of the sequence showed considerable variability. In particular, our attention was drawn to the FPPRGPRPVQSV sequence in Homo Sapiens Cdk4 which showed little or no conservation beyond mammalian species.
Sequence alignment of Cdk4, 6, and 2, showed considerable conservation between all three proteins, as expected. The 12mer segment previously identified in the alignment of mammalian and non-mammalian Cdk4 sequences, however, exhibited very little homology with either Cdk6 or Cdk2 (also apparent in data from an independent Cdk modelling exercise ), again suggesting that it might have a unique functional role. In addition to Cdk4, a search of the protein database for similar sequences to "FPPRGPRPVQSV" only returned Ras GTPase-activating protein-binding protein 2 for which there is, at present, no structural data.
Quality and accuracy scores for the built models
Base template 1BLX, Variable regions differing by more than 2.0 Å rmsd modelled from 1G3N, 1BI8, 1BI7 and 1JOW (all CDK6)
Base template 1BLX, Variable regions differing by more than 2.0 Å rmsd. modelled from 1HCL (CDK2)
Base template 1BLX, Variable regions differing by more than 2.0 Å rmsd. modelled from 1GII (CDK2)
Molecular mechanics energy (kJ mol-1)
RMS deviation from 1BLX (in Å)
Structure Z-scores, positive is better than average
2nd generation packing quality
Ramachandran plot appearance
χ-1/χ-2 rotamer quality
RMS Z-scores,should be close to 1
Omega angle restraints
Side chain planarity
Improper dihedral distribution
An isolated hexapeptide, homologous with the central sequence of the FPPRGPRPVQ external Cdk4 loop, kills human RT112 bladder cancer cells but not normal diploid human fibroblasts
In-vitro Survival of RT112 Human Bladder Cancer and Normal Diploid Human Fibroblasts
Human Bladder Cancer
Normal Diploid Fibroblasts
- - -
+ + + + +
- - -
+ + +
+ + +
+ + +
+ + +
+ + +
+ + +
+ + +
+ + +
+ + +
+ + +
+ + +
+ + +
PRGPRP cell killing is specific for cancer cells and is amino-acid sequence dependent
Cyclic amphiphilic constructs containing the PRGPRP amino-acid sequence show specific activity at micromolar concentrations and a shorter time to cell death
In-vitro Survival of H460 Human Non-small Cell Lung Cancer and Normal Diploid Human Fibroblasts Following Exposure to Cyclic Non-Amphiphilic or Linear Amphiphilic Analogues of PRGPRP.
Human Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Normal Diploid Fibroblasts
+ + +
+ + +
+ + +
+ + +
+ + +
+ + +
+ + +
+ + +
+ + +
+ + +
+ + +
+ + +
In-vitro Survival of H460 Human Non-small Cell Lung Cancer and Normal Diploid Human Fibroblasts Following Exposure to Cyclic Amphiphilic Analogues of PRGPRP.
Human Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Normal Diploid Fibroblasts
_ _ _
+ + +
+ + +
+ + +
_ _ _
+ + +
_ _ _
+ + +
+ + +
Importance of arginines in the cancerocidal activity of PRGPRP-containing cyclin amphiphilic peptides
The previously observed, arginine-related, structure/function relationship to PRGPRP at 5 mM (Table 2,II vs. 2,VII & Figure 3C) was retained in the cyclic amphiphilic compounds (Compare survival of H460 cells exposed to THR53 or THR53C Figures 3D, 4C). Additionally N-mono-methylation within the guanidium moiety of the arginines (Table 4,XX-XXII) removed the cytotoxic activity of THR54 against H460 cells.
THR53 kills a wide range of human cancer cells but not MRC5-hTERT immortalised fibroblasts or human diploid keratinocytes
Human in-vitro cancer cell lines showing a complete response to 200 μM THR53
ICR Sutton, Surrey
Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma
Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma
Time course and morphological changes of MRC5-hTERT and cancer cells exposed to 200 μM THR53
Additional file 4:Time Lapse Photomicrographic Video of Control MRC5-hTERT immortalised normal human fibroblasts growing in the absence of THR53.THR53. Control MRC5-hTERT immortalised normal human fibroblasts were grown in the absence of THR53. Photomicrographic video frames at ×40 magnification were taken at 20 minute intervals and are shown at 7 frames per second. MRC5-hTERT immortalised normal human fibroblasts went through a series of repeated cell divisions without evidence of cell death. (MOV 273 KB)
THR53 anticancer activity is dependent on cells being in cycle
The Cdk1/Cdk4 ratio changes following exposure to PRGPRP and THR53
Cdk1 and Cdk4 have been shown to have closely correlated expression across a wide range of human cancer cell lines . This co-expression is unaffected by cytocidal doses of cisdiamminedichloroplatinum  but can accompany spontaneous cancer cell death . Whether or not Cdk1/Cdk4 co-expression remained constant in cancer cells dying as a result of exposure to PRGPRP was thus examined by Western blotting. After exposure to PRGPRP, but not PRRPGP, RT112 cells showed a progressive rise over 10 days in Cdk1 expression compared to Cdk4 (Figure 6C). Similar results were obtained after exposure to 200 μM THR53 (Figure 6D), with complete disappearance of Cdk4 at 24 hours. These results suggest a potential role for PRGPRP in modulating Cdk4/Cdk1 co-expression in parallel with cancer cell killing and point to the possibility of the Cdk1/Cdk4 ratio as being a potential companion theranostic biomarker for PRGPRP anticancer activity.
100 μM THR53 causes depletion of ATP in dying H460 cells but does not induce autophagy
Trypan blue assay for necrosis in H460 and H1299 human non-small cell lung cancer cells and MCF-7 human breast cancer cells
The absence of autophagy in H460 cells indicates that this mode of cell death is unlikely to provide a general explanation for the selective lethality of PRGPRP compounds against human cancer cells. Necrosis is characterised by loss of cell membrane integrity. Viable cells do not incorporate trypan blue. Failure to exclude this dye reflects a loss of plasma membrane integrity associated with necrosis .
Figure 4A shows THR53 induces necrosis, as detected by trypan blue uptake, in all 3 human cancer cell lines but not in MRC5-h-TERT immortalised fibroblasts. The time courses of appearance of necrotic cells are closely similar for all three human cancer cell lines, being initially detectable at day 3 and progressively increasing over the following 4 days at comparable rates. In each case there is a parallel diminution in the percentage of viable cells. The ability to induce necrosis as identified by failure of trypan blue exclusion is dependent on the hexapeptide amino-acid sequence; being present with the amphiphilic cyclised polymer THR53 which carries PRGPRP but not with THR53C which carries PRRPGP (Figure 4C).
Small peptides containing the PRGPRP amino-acid sequence are selectively toxic to a wide range of cancer cells whilst sparing normal cells
The amino-acid sequence Pro-Arg-Gly-Pro-Arg-Pro (PRGPRP) within small peptides is selectively cancerocidal towards a wide range of human in-vitro cancer cell lines but not normal diploid human keratinocytes, fibroblasts or immortalised MRC5-hTERT cells. The ubiquitous, selective anticancer activity is highly dependent on the arginines within the hexapeptide sequence, because alteration of the amino acid sequence to Pro-Arg-Arg-Pro-Gly-Pro removes the cancerocidal capacity as does substitution of the arginines for glutamic acid or L-NG-monomethyl-arginine. The lack of toxicity of PRGPRP compounds for non-cancerous cells and the removal of anticancer activity by modulation of the arginines in PRGPRP indicate that, although used here in high concentration, these compounds do have a truly selective cancerocidal activity. The relatively low specific activity of these peptides, at present, precludes their immediate progress to in-vivo studies as lead agents. Preliminary pharmacokinetic experiments with a maximum tolerated dose of THR53 (Institute of Cancer Therapeutics, University of Bradford, UK) have shown low plasma levels which were not persistent, indicating that there is a need for new PRGPRP congeners of higher specific activity. Having identified a novel therapeutic strategy and demonstrated proof of principle with the first and second generation compounds, medicinal chemistry studies to produce a further generation of compounds with improved PK are being undertaken.
The findings presented here of broad anticancer activity without toxicity to normal cells accompanied by a putative companion theranostic of altered Cdk1/Cdk4 ratios, however, merit continued investigation with the potential for development of a new range of anticancer therapeutics.
PRGPRP-containing peptides could be causing cancer cell death by necrosis
Therapeutic stresses are generally understood to result in three possible types of programmed cell death (PCD); namely apoptosis (PCD I), autophagy (PCD II) or necrosis (PCD III) . Following exposure to 200 μM THR53, the morphological appearances of two histologically distinct cancer cell lines, H460 and RT112 (Figures 5B, C) are not dissimilar to phase contrast images of Caco-2, human colon adenocarcinoma cells undergoing autophagic cell death 3 days after exposure to imiquimod . There was, however, no evidence of autophagy in the Cyto-ID Green assay of H460 human lung cancer cells treated with a 100 μM dose of THR53 which causes 50% death in this cell line (Figure 7C). Moreover, morphological or DNA histogram manifestations of apoptosis were not seen after exposure to THR53. Apoptosis is an energy-requiring, cellular, autodestructive process dependent on ATP; in contrast to necrosis which is not ATP-dependent [36, 38]. Depletion of ATP as seen in H460 cells treated with 100 μM THR53 would be expected to direct cell death towards necrosis rather than apoptosis. Moreover, H460 and two other cancer cell lines (H1299 and MCF-7) exhibited similar time courses for necrosis as assayed by trypan blue exclusion.
Disruption of Cdk1/Cdk4 co-expression following exposure to 200 μM THR53
An extensive literature search has failed to provide an explanation for the relative elevation of Cdk1 in dying cancer cells following drug exposure and whether or not this might be related to necrotic cell death. Cdk1 elevation does, however, indicate that PRGPRP and its analogues are not apparently causing any defect in the classical Cdk4 downstream pathway. If proved consistent, however, such a change in Cdk1/Cdk4 co-expression could potentially provide a theranostic biomarker for PRGPRP analogue therapeutic efficacy.
Potential protein-protein interactions involving PRGPRP
In keeping with its congruence to the PxxP motif described in binding to SH3 domains , PRGPRP is likely involved in protein-protein interactions. Singularly, however, the charged arginines of PRGPRP lie within, rather than flanking, the proline-rich core.
Despite the discovery route described here, however, and the intriguing location of PRGPRP within an externalised loop of Cdk4 not present in the homologous regions of Cdk2, Cdk6 or Cdk1, there is no direct evidence that this amino-acid sequence is functional within the whole normal Cdk4 protein. Resolving this will be the subject of future investigations. In addition, although it appears that the distance of the external loop containing the PRGPRP amino-acid sequence from the site of Cyclin D1 binding in the Cdk4 protein (Figure 1C) and the failure of conditional expression of the whole Cdk4 molecule to induce pRb phosphorylation (Figure 1B) or alter cell cycle phase distribution (Figure 6B), make it unlikely that PRGPRP itself and its congeners affect cyclin D1 binding and subsequent pRb phosphorylation, we have not directly confirmed this.
Putative mechanism of PRGPRP cytotoxicity
The lack of efficacy of THR53 killing in quiescent MCF-7 breast cancer cells maintained in complete medium plus 0.1% FCS (Figure 6A), suggests that human cancer cells may need to have entered the cell cycle to become vulnerable to THR53. Nonetheless no perturbation of cell cycle phase distribution was seen. Based on all our currently available data, therefore, we hypothesise that, to supplement its classical cyclin-dependent kinase activity when bound to cyclin D, Cdk4 might also embody a kinase-independent signalling mechanism to release sufficient energy to enable cell division. Thus a putative function of the FPPRGPRPVQSV domain may be to promote the increase in ATP that is required to carry out cell division. A requirement for the FPPRGPRPVQSV region of Cdk4 to provide energy for cancer cell division could also provide an explanation for the fact that Cdk4 rather than Cdk2 or Cdk6 appears to be the mandatory cyclin-dependent kinase for carcinogenic malignant transformation.
Cancer cells in a metabolically active state of relentless cell division are highly energy dependent, deriving this energy from anaerobic metabolism as opposed to the aerobic metabolism of normal cells [40, 41]. PRGPRP at high concentration may cause selective cancer cell necrosis by inhibition of anaerobic ATP provision, either as an isolated activity of presently unknown mechanism, or by competitive inhibition of the FPPRGPRPVQSV region of Cdk4. Disruption of energy provision, in this manner, might be expected to show the uniform selective cancer cell killing effect reported here. The detailed molecular interactions involved in these results require considerable further investigation. Nonetheless, ubiquitous, cancer-selective, killing by PRGPRP compounds may potentially herald new forms of anticancer therapy at the proteomic level.
Cell culture, clonogenic assays and Western blotting have previously been described [20, 20]. All cell lines were from certified sources [24, 30]. In addition to experiments in The Cancer Sciences Division of The University of Southampton some cell biology assays were carried out by Horizon Discovery Services (260 Cambridge Science Park, Milton Road, Cambridge, CB4 0WE). THR53, THR54 and THR79 (Synthesised by Polypeptide Laboratories Inc. 365 Maple Avenue Torrance CA 90503 USA) were prepared by dissolving in 10 μL of DMSO followed by introduction into 10 ml of tissue culture medium with rapid mixing, diluted to the required dose in tissue culture medium, introduced to the appropriate cells and left in situ for the duration of the experiment. Primary antibodies for Western blotting were: Cdk1 - mouse monoclonal sc-54 at 1/250, Cdk2 sc-748 at 1/250, Cdk4 - rabbit polyclonal sc-260 at 1/250, Cdk6 - rabbit polyclonal sc-260 at 1/250, pRb 105 rabbit polyclonal sc-50 at 1/1000, pRb 110 (hyperphosphorylated) rabbit polyclonal sc-32824 at 1/500 (All from Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc, Bergheime Str 89-2, 69115 Heidelberg, Germany). The ecdysone-inducible CDK4 expression system in 2780 human ovarian carcinoma cells was constructed by cloning CDK4 cDNA from a previously described pcDNA3 vector  into a pIND vector (Invitrogen). Linearised constructs of this vector were transfected into 2780 cells with FuGENE™ reagent (Roche). Resistant colonies were selected by 2 weeks exposure to G418, expanded, and tested for increased Cdk4 expression following exposure to 1 μM muristerone.
Mitochondrial function (alamar blue) NCI-H460 cells were grown in Ham's F12 media supplemented with 10% FCS. Cells were harvested and added to 96-well plates at densities of 250-1000. Compounds were made up from stock solutions and added directly to cells at the concentrations indicated. Cells were grown with compound for the indicated time at 37°C, 5% CO2, in a humidified atmosphere. Alamar Blue 10% (v/v) was then added and incubated for a further 4 h, and fluorescent product detected using the BMG FLUOstar plate reader. The media only background was subtracted and the data analysed as appropriate.
Total cellular protein (sulphorhodamine B assay) was carried out on alamar Blue treated cells once this assay had been completed. Control medium/alamar blue were removed and 200 μl PBS was added. Cells were fixed by layering 25% (v/v) of a 50% TCA solution on top and incubating for 1 h at 4°C. Wells were rinsed with water and allowed to air dry. Cells were then stained in 0.4% SRB solution, before rinsing with 1% acetic acid and air drying. Incorporated dye was solubilised in 10 mM Tris and absorbance measured at 565 nm and 690 nm. Absorbance measurements at 690 nm were subtracted from the 565 nm readings to correct for multi-well plate absorbance.
Cellular ATP levels (CellTiter-Glo assay) Cells were grown, seeded and compound-treated as for the alamar Blue assay. A volume of the CellTiter-Glo reagent equal to the volume of cell culture media was added to the cells. Plates were mixed for 2 min on an orbital shaker to induce cell lysis before the plate was incubated at room temperature for 10 min to stabilize the signal. The luminescent signal was measured and the media only background was subtracted.
Autophagy Assay was performed as recommended by the manufacturers' instructions (Enzo ENZ-51031-K200). Briefly, H460 cells were seeded into 6 well plates at 2.5 × 105 and 1 × 105 cells/well. Immediately after cell plating, chloroquine or THR53 were added at the concentrations indicated. Following compound treatment, cells were washed once in PBS and resuspended in x1 Cyto-ID Green autophagy detection reagent and incubated at room temperature for 30 min. Immediately prior to analysis, propidium iodide (PI) solution was added to the cell suspension at a final concentration of 2.5 μg/ml, to assess cell death. Analysis was carried out using FACSCalibur (BD Biosciences). Cyto-ID Green autophagy reagent was measured in the FL-1 channel (530/30 nm bandpass filters with excitation at 488 nm) and PI measured in the FL-3 channel (670 nm longpass filters with excitation at 488 nm).
Necrosis Assay Cells were plated in triplicate in 96 well plates at concentrations of 500 cells per well (HT1299, MCF-7) or 1000 cells per well (H460, MRC5-hTERT) in the presence or absence of the relevant compound and assessed by Trypan Blue exclusion At 2,3,4 and 7 days after plating. To assay, cells were trypsinised off, stained with trypan blue in isotonic medium and live and dead cells separately counted visually by haemocytomter. Each data point is the mean of results from triplicate wells (Solid lines - Live cells, Broken lines - Dead Cells; Blue - Control, Red - THR53 200 μM).
The amino acid sequences used in this work were obtained from the Swiss-Prot and TrEMBL databases, maintained at the Expasy molecular biology server (http://ca.expasy.org/). The sequence similarity searches were performed using BLAST  maintained by the Swiss Institute for Biology (SIB), using default parameters unless otherwise stated. The sequences for potential templates were obtained from the PDB via a Blast search. Global multiple sequence alignments were performed using the program ClustalX . Secondary structure alignments were performed using Swiss PDB-viewer v3.7 .
Using the global multiple alignment, corrected for secondary structure, the program mutates non-conserved residues while retaining the original backbone conformation. The mutated residues were subjected to energy minimisation to remove atom clashes. The minimisation was performed in torsion angle space, using the fast torsion angle minimiser implemented in JACKAL. The energy function uses the CHARMM22 all atom force field . Insertions and deletions are then performed, with the bonds closed using a random tweak method. The results are again minimised.
The secondary structure was assigned using a DSSP-like routine .
Prediction of the identified loop regions was performed as follows: a) First, the original backbone segment was deleted and replaced by a new segment that was made by generating a large number of random backbone conformations, which were then closed using a random tweak method, b) the closed conformers were subjected to energy minimisation using the fast torsion angle minimiser, c) the side chains were then modelled using a large rotamer library of 3222 rotamers in 10° bins and subjected to further minimisation, d) the best candidate, the conformer with the lowest energy, was retained, and a further round of conformation sampling was performed about the new conformation, e) the final structure was subjected once again to energy minimisation.
The secondary structure elements were then refined by again sampling through a backbone rotamer library, but with the original rotamer retained in the sampling. To retain the hydrogen-bonding network of the existing secondary structure, a large energy penalty was incurred by any conformation that broke an existing hydrogen bond (hydrogen bonds are defined as in DSSP). The lowest energy conformation was retained. The side chains were then built in a similar way.
The final model was minimised using the torsion angle minimiser.
After the construction of the model, it was subjected to 500 steps of steepest descent full energy minimisation using AMBER, with the parm96 force field . The polar hydrogen atoms were added by WHATIF  after optimising the hydrogen-bond network.
Steps 1-6 were repeated until no further improvement in the model was obtained.
At points it was also necessary to manually tweak the structures. This was performed through the Swiss PDB-viewer. The final models were assessed for accuracy and quality by the programs WHAT-CHECK and Swiss PDB-viewer. The threading energy given by Swiss PDB-viewer is based on the potential of mean force developed by Sippl et al. . The molecular mechanics energy was calculated using the GROMACS96 force field  and was also implemented in Swiss PDB-viewer.
We are grateful to Mikhail Lomosonov for Western blotting of Cdk1/Cdk4 in RT112 cells, Bill Primrose (Theryte Ltd) for designing THR79, Kyla Grimshaw (Horizon Discovery Services, 260 Cambridge Science Park, Milton Road, Cambridge, CB4 0WE) for some of the clonogenic assays and photomicrography, Kyla Grimshaw and John Goodall for carrying out sulphorhodamine, Alamar Blue, Cell Titre-Glo and autophagy assays and Amanda Howarth for data analysis and preparation of figures.
This work was supported by the Cancer and Polio Research Fund, Hoylake, Wirral, UK and Theryte Ltd., William Russell House, The Square, Lightwater, Surrey, GU18 5SS, UK.
- Sridhar J, Akula N, Pattabiraman N: Selectivity and potency of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors. AAPS J. 2006, 8: 204-221. 10.1208/aapsj080125.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Graf F, Koehler L, Kniess T, Wuest F, Mosch B, Pietzsch J: Cell cycle regulating Cdk4 as a potential target for tumor cell treatment and tumor imaging. J Oncol Hindawi. 2009, 12-Article ID 106378Google Scholar
- Grana X, Reddy E: Cell cycle control in mammalian cells: role of cyclins, cyclin dependent kinases (CDKs), growth suppressor genes and cyclin dependent kinase inhibitors (CKIs). Oncogene. 1995, 11: 211-219.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Day P, Cleasby A, Tickle I, O'Reilly M, Coyle J, Holding F, McMenamin R, Yon J, Chopra R, Lengauer C, Jhoti H: Crystal structure of human CDK4 in complex with a D-type cyclin. PNAS. 2009, 106: 4166-4170. 10.1073/pnas.0809645106PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kelland L: Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors and combination chemotherapy: Experimental and clinical status. Inhibitors of Cyclin-Dependent Kinases as Antitumour Agents. Edited by: Paul J Smith, Eddy W Yue. 2007, 371-388. CRC Enzyme Inhibitor Series. Taylor and Francis. Boca Raton London New YorkGoogle Scholar
- van Montfort R, Workman P: Structure-based design of molecular cancer therapeutics. Cell. 2009, 27: 315-328.Google Scholar
- Dickson M, Schwartz G: Development of cell-cycle inhibitors for cancer therapy. Current Oncology. 2009, 16: 36-43.8.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Menu E, Garcia J, Huang X, Di Liberto M, Toogood P, Chen I, Vanderkerken K, Chen-Kiang S: A novel therapeutic combination using PD 0332991 and bortezomib: study in the 5T33MM myeloma model. Cancer Res. 2008, 68: 5519-5523. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-6404View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rodriguez-Puebla M, Miliani de Marval P, LaCava M, Moons S, Kiyokawa H, Conti C: Cdk4 deficiency inhibits skin tumour development but does not affect normal keratinocyte proliferation. Am J Pathol. 2002, 161: 405-411. 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64196-XPubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lucas J, Domenico J, Gelfand E: Cyclin-dependent kinase 6 inhibits proliferation of human mammary epithelial cells. Mol Cancer Res. 2004, 2: 105-114.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Miliani de Marval P, Macias E, Roundbehler R, Sicinski P, Kiyokawa H, Johnson D, Conti C, Rodriguez-Puebla M: Lack of cyclin-dependent kinase 4 inhibits c-myc tumorogenic actgivities in epithelial tissues. Mol Cell Biol. 2004, 24: 7538-7547. 10.1128/MCB.24.17.7538-7547.2004PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Macias E, Kim Y, Miliani de Marval P, Klein-Szanto A, Rodriguez-Puebla M: Cdk2 deficiency decreases ras/CDK4-dependent malignant progression but not myc-induced tumorogenesis. Cancer Res. 2007, 67: 9713-9720. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-2119PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rodriguez-Puebla M, La Cava M, Conti C: Cyclin D1 overexpression in mouse epidermis increases cyclin-dependent kinase activity and cell proliferation in-vivo but does not affect skin development. Cell Growth Differ. 1999, 10: 467-472.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Macias E, Miliani de Marval P, De Siervi A, Conti C, Senderowicz A, Rodriguez-Puebla M: CDK2 activation in mouse epidermis induces keratinocyte proliferation but does not affect skin tumour development. Am J Pathol. 2008, 173: 526-535. 10.2353/ajpath.2008.071124PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Malumbres M, Barbacid M: Cell cycle, CDKs and cancer: a changing paradigm. Nat Rev Cancer. 2009, 9: 153-166. 10.1038/nrc2602View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Takaki T, Fukasawa K, Suzuki-Takahashi I, Semba K, Kitagawa M, Taya Y, Hirai H: Preferences for phosphorylation sites in the retinoblastoma protein of D-type cyclin-dependent kinases, Cdk4 and Cdk6 in vitro. J Biochem. 2005, 137: 381-386. 10.1093/jb/mvi050View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Laman H, Funes J, Ye H, Henderson S, Galinanes-Garcia L, Hara E, Knowles P, McDonald N, Boshoff C: Transforming activity of Fbxo7 is mediated specifically through regulation of cyclin D/Cdk6. EMBO J. 2005, 24: 3104-3116. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600775PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Grossel M, Hinds P: From cell cycle to differentiation. Cell cycle. 2006, 5: 266-270. 10.4161/cc.5.3.2385View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ericson K, Krull D, Slomiany P, Grossel M: Expression of cyclin-dependent kinase 6, but not cyclin-dependent kinase 4, alters morphology of cultured mouse astrocytes. Mol Cancer Res. 2003, 1: 654-664.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Seabra L, Warenius H: Proteomic co-expression of cyclin-dependent kinases 1 and 4 in human cancer cells. Eur J Cancer. 2007, 43: 1483-1492. 10.1016/j.ejca.2007.03.014View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhang JM, Wei Q, Zhao X, Paterson B: Coupling of the cell cycle and myogenesis through the cyclin D1-dependent interaction of MyoD with cdk4. EMBO J. 1999, 18: 926-933. 10.1093/emboj/18.4.926PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ruas M, Gregory F, Jones R, Poolman R, Starborg M, Rowe J, Brookes S, Peters G: CDK4 and CDK6 delay senescence by kinase-dependent and p16INK4a -independent mechanisms. Mol Cell Biol. 2007, 12: 4273-4282.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Weihua Z, Tsan R, Whang W, Wu Q, Chiu CH, Fidler I, Hung MC: Survival of cancer cells is maintained by EGFR independent of its kinase activity. Cancer Cell. 2008, 13: 385-393. 10.1016/j.ccr.2008.03.015PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Warenius H, Howarth A, Seabra L, Kyritsi L, Dormer R, Anandappa S, Thomas C: Dynamic heterogeneity of proteomic expression in human cancer cells does not affect Cdk1/Cdk4 co-expression. J Exp Ther Oncol. 2008, 7: 237-254.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Warenius H, Kyritsi L, Grierson I, Howarth A, Seabra L, Jones M, Thomas C, Browning P, White R: Spontaneous regression of human cancer cells in-vitro: Potential role of disruption of Cdk1/Cdk4 co-expression. Anticancer Res. 2009, 29: 1933-1942.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Takaki T, Echalier A, Brown N, Hunt T, Endicott J, Noble M: The structure of CDK4/cyclin D3 has implications for models of CDK activation. PNAS. 2009, 106: 4171-4176. 10.1073/pnas.0809674106PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mascarenhas N, Ghoshal N: Combined ligand and structure based approaches for narrowing the essential physicochemical characteristics for CDK4 inhibition. J Chem Inf Model. 2008, 48: 1325-1336. 10.1021/ci8000343View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K: VMD - Visual Molecular Dynamics. J Molec Graphics. 1996, 14: 33-38. 10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Oelke J, Wallucat G, Wolf Y, Ehrlich A, Wiesner B, Berger H, Bienert M: Enhancement of intracellular concentration and biological activity of PNA after conjugation with a cell-penetrating synthetic model peptide. Eur J Biochem. 2004, 271: 3043-3049. 10.1111/j.1432-1033.2004.04236.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Warenius H, Seabra L, Kyritsi L, White R, Dormer R, Anandappa S, Thomas C, Howarth A: Theranostic proteomic profiling of cyclins, cyclin dependent kinases and Ras in human cancer cell lines is dependent on p53 mutational status. Int J Oncol. 2008, 32: 895-907.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Voigt W: Sulforhodamine B assay and chemosensitivity. Methods Mol Med. 2005, 110: 39-48.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nakayama GR, Caton MC, Nova MP, Parandoosh Z: Assessment of the Alamar Blue assay for cellular growth and viability in vitro. J Immunol Methods. 1997, 204: 205-208. 10.1016/S0022-1759(97)00043-4View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Turman MA, Mathews A: A simple luciferase assay to measure ATP levels in small numbers of cells using a fluorescent plate reader. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Animal. 1996, 32: 1-4. 10.1007/BF02722985View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mizushima N, Yoshimorim T, Levine B: Methods in mammalian autophagy research. Cell. 2010, 140: 313-326. 10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.028PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bonfoco E, Krainc D, Ankarcrona M, Nicotera P, Lipton S: Apoptosis and necrosis: Two distinct events induced, respectively, by mild and intense insults with N-methyl-D-aspartate or nitric oxide/superoxide in cortical cell cultures. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995, 92: 7162-7166. 10.1073/pnas.92.16.7162PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Amaravadi R, Thompson C: The roles of therapy-induced autophagy and necrosis in cancer treatment. Clin cancer Res. 2007, 13: 271-7279.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yi J, Jung YJ, Choi S, Hwang J, Chung E: Autophagy-mediated anti-tumoral activity of imuiquinod in Caco-2 cells. Biochem Biophys Res Comm. 2009, 386: 455-458. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.06.046View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tsujimoto Y: Apoptosis and necrosis: Intracellular ATP level as a determinant for cell death modes. Cell death and differentiation. 2007, 4: 429-434.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ball LJ, Kuhne R, Schneider-Mergener J, Oschkinat H: Recognition of Proline-Rich Motifs by Protein-Protein Interation Domains. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2005, 44: 2852-2869. 10.1002/anie.200400618.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Warburg O: The Prime Cause and Prevention of cancer. 1967, Triltsch., Wurzburg, GermanyGoogle Scholar
- Kaelin W, Thompson C: Clues from cell metabolism. Nature. 2010, 465: 562-64. 10.1038/465562aView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Altschul S, Madden T, Schaffer A, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman D: Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25: 3389-3402. 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jeanmougin F, Thompson J, Gouy M, Higgins D, Gibson J: Multiple sequence alignment with Clustal X. Trends Biochem Sci. 1998, 23: 403-5. 10.1016/S0968-0004(98)01285-7View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Guex N, Peitsch M: SWISS-MODEL and the Swiss-PdbViewer: An environment for comparative protein modeling. Electrophoresis. 1997, 18: 2714-2723. The program can be obtained from, http://www.expasy.org/spdbv 10.1002/elps.1150181505View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hooft R, Vriend G, Sander C, Abola E: Errors in protein structures. Nature. 1996, 38: 272-272.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- JACKAL 1.5. 2010, http://bhapp.c2b2.columbia.edu/software/Jackal
- Xiang Z, Honig B: Extending the accuracy limits of prediction for side-chain conformations. J Mol Biol. 2001, 311: 421-30. 10.1006/jmbi.2001.4865View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Xiang Z, Soto C, Honig B: Evaluating configurational free energies: the colony energy concept and its application to the problem of protein loop prediction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002, 99: 7432-7437. 10.1073/pnas.102179699PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Case D: AMBER 7 Users Manual. 2002, University of California San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
- Friend G: WHAT IF: a molecular modelling and drug design program. J Mol Graph. 1990, 8: 52-56. 10.1016/0263-7855(90)80070-VView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sippl J: Calculation of Conformational Ensembles from Potentials of Mean Force: an approach to the knowledge based prediction of local structures in globular proteins. J Mol Bio. 1990, 213: 859-883. 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80269-4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- van Gunsteren W, Daura X, Mark A: Biomolecular Simulations: The GROMOS96 Manual and User Guide. 1968, Zürich, VdF Hochschulverlag ETHZGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.